Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Adrian Loveridge - Hotelier
Adrian Loveridge

Even if the repeatedly broken promises confirming that all registered hotels will qualify for the same concessions given to Sandals last year came into practical effect this week, it is now far too late for the vast majority of properties to make any meaningful use of them this year, at least in terms of major upgrading. Whether it was Government’s honest intention or not, Sandals look like they will re-open with an enhanced quality product advantage in late January 2015 that virtually every other hotel cannot hope to compete with.

Again, it’s important to repeat that like most other tourism businesses we welcome the group’s arrival and in the long term hope that it will drive additional investment and upgrading on a level playing field. Despite the continued speculation about added airlift, it simply will not happen until the Beaches property is hopefully completed in a yet indeterminate number of years from now. The short term reality is that we have lost a potential 25,000 airline seats in the interim reconstruction period. That would not have happened if the former Casuarina/Couples hotel had remained open. Only time will tell if punishing around 5,000 rooms, while rewarding just 280 will prove to be a sustainable long term solution to the overall industry challenges.

In hindsight it’s perhaps easy to see how this situation developed. The trappings of a private corporate jet, a luxury yacht, well oiled and orchestrated publicity machine with seemingly impressive amounts of money running into tens of millions being mentioned almost every day. It was a tantalising and perhaps almost impossible option to resist in the current economic climate. When you look across the state of our entire tourism industry perhaps the closest comparison can be made with Rome burning while Nero played the fiddle in A.D. 64. 70 percent of the ‘eternal’ city was destroyed, but it enabled the Emperor to re-build the capital in a style that he preferred. Of course someone had to be blamed and Nero chose the Christians who were ruthlessly rounded up, tortured and killed. Perhaps in a modern day context those victims should be more fairly compared with the disadvantaged ‘other hoteliers’.

I wonder how many other industry observers cracked a wry smile when the Minister of Finance was reported as saying ‘we (seem to) live in an instant coffee society: everybody wants everything done now’.  Using the same analogy clearly the ‘espresso’ concessions extracted by Mr. Stewart escaped the beverage scenario. So without, what could amount to additional reinvestment in the entire remaining accommodation sector, we are yet another year away from upgrading existing plant. Personally I cannot understand why our policymakers while recognising they cannot provide ‘instant’ solutions but seriously expect us to.

The danger lurks that yet further tour operators will withdraw more programmes from Barbados, while transferring them to lower cost destinations to meet the more realistic expectations of their clients. It’s a perfectly natural progression. You go where your source of business can obtain the best value-for-money with the least possible financial risk.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

141 responses to “Sandals Concessions Too Late to Make a Difference to Tourism Industry!”


  1. David | August 27, 2014 at 6:16 PM |

    We always veer from the point. Adrian is suggesting in this blog that the concessions promised by government will not help the hospitality sector so late in the game. Remember the government agreed to give the concession and Butch Stewart agreed there should be a level playing field. Before the coming of Sandals the conversation was about transparency with the transaction.

    and that was already fully vetted agreed by some and disagreed by others pursuant to govt decision…..now what more do you want to be said,,it is your blog you can say a million times over whatever u want to say, on any issue, the point is that the article has submitted other areas for engagement,,,,meanwhile the attacks on the butch product has been relentless and not a peek from u,,however when a different point of view is given,,yu pull out your bully pulpit on the call for ORDER,,,,,,repugnant…,,,,,


  2. No transparency – No vote – No Power.


  3. @Caribbean Lover

    Sandals has promised local farmers to buy much of their produce and more when they launch. What has been the St.Lucia experience?


  4. ac | August 27, 2014 at 5:52 PM |
    “the Sandals ‘Barbados website is breathtaking,,so far deserving of every concession butch got,,”

    Ok, I visited the “Sandals Barbados breath-taking web-site” and I must agree with AC……. it is absolutely breath-taking.
    It takes my breath away to see that Butch will have a number of restaurants where “guests can explore an impressive array of cuisine with 11 unique dining concepts such as Caribbean seafood, regional Italian, French-style patisserie Café de Paris, ‘Soy’ Japanese, Butch’s Chophouse (a New York-style steakhouse), Bombay Club (Sandals’ first ever Indian restaurant)”.
    With all the concessions, not one restaurant offering local cuisine… breath-taking isn’t it?

    However AC, perhaps you should visit the Trip Advisor web-site to see the “breath-taking” reviews of Sandals Barbados Resort in St. Lawrence, Christ Church.

    AC, we all know your role on this blog is to defend this DLP administration at all costs, even if in doing so, you make yourself appear as being stupid. The upside of this is that you are anonymous and this will take some shame away from you.
    I don’t think Barbadians are opposed to the idea of Sandals operating in Barbados, but they have a right to express concerns about the way Stewart conducts business; whether his business practices are ethical; if the concession given will have long term benefits for Barbados, or short term benefits for him; if most of his food will be locally supplied or imported; or what benefits will the concessions given have for other players in the tourism industry.


  5. Fact- Despite the existing linkages among the sectors and the potential of the agrotourism sector as an earner of foreign exchange, several constraints have been identified. These include the absence of information, technical assistance and funding for investment, poor rural infrastructure, uncoordinated systems for certification of products and service providers that are relevant to the Caribbean reality and consistent with basic international requirements and standards; and an apparent weakness among community-based organizations and producer associations to work in organized professional groups to develop and manage projects, access markets or take advantage of available assistance and financial resources.
    David always answers a question with a question.
    Perhaps you can see, from above,no one is geared up for this in Barbados. Only a “smart” middle man can be contracted to supply from both import and local. Bet he’s already got the contracts.


  6. @Artax

    It is unfair to judge Sandals before the closure for renovation.


  7. Sandals should encourage their guests to explore Barbados restaurants. It would reduce the Sandals food and liquor expense.


  8. The BU isn’t a secret society – it’s a society with secrets – like the Masons.
    David – simply controls the main spin, by colouring the dialog. Oh and he does the Herculean task for free. Check out his Mo. a. A question disguised as a statement ( Nearly every day )
    b. Making a personal statement and pretending it is someone else’s ( by anonymous blogger )
    c. Guilt trips ( extra blogging )
    d. Confrontational statements ( every day )
    e. The “silent treatment” ( during intense blogging )
    f. The “no way out” question ( usually daily blog )
    g. Lie ( content of his Blog )
    h. Intimidate ( a buddy will always appear ) David did you get my confidential message.

    Spin and spin, till we get in..

    Arrogant underling.


  9. Perhaps you don’t need a degree in political science, you already have a masters in, wait……., looks like it….. smells like…..it – tastes like….. must be BULLSHITE Dave buddy. I notice the thick brown rings round your ankles where you’ve been stuck up someone’s arse..


  10. @ David
    We take exception to anybody telling a sovereign government that it is too late to despense corporate largesse. That fcuking mindset presumes that this government really belongs to the likes of that writer. It is so presumptuous and ungrateful that even when this government misguidedly ‘spends’ taxpayers’ money where it should not have the fcukers are really saying, we’ll take the money anyhow but you will not get anything in return, not even gratitude. What a pack of louts.

    These recent expenditures of corporate welfare come after the fours seasons projects and so on. When will these corporate beggars, like real capitalists, tranform ‘their’ industry to make it profitable? So we have a government captured by an industry and unable to break out of its stranglehold. Like a leach the industry will continue to suck the blood from the dying corpse of the Bajan mass until no longer possible.


  11. and yes sandals and several Caribbean hotels have made it part of their goal to buy local

    here is a list of hotels despite the many challenges that they have to faced in buying local has made such a practice and on going effort on their part,

    Bahamas – Goodfellows Farm
    Jamaica – Sandals Montego Bay and Mafoota Farmers; SuperClubs, Breezes
    Nevis – Nevis Growers Assn. & Four Seasons Resort (FSR)
    St. Lucia – Santoy, Black Bay and Mafoota Farmers (Sandals Chain – Jamaica & St. Lucia);

    you can read the article in its entirety..

    http://www.agricarib.org/primary-dropdown/agriculture-and-tourism


  12. These recent expenditures of corporate welfare come after the fours seasons projects and so on. When will these corporate beggars, like real capitalists, tranform ‘their’ industry to make it profitable? So we have a government captured by an industry and unable to break out of its stranglehold. Like a leach the industry will continue to suck the blood from the dying corpse of the Bajan mass until no longer possible.

    they won’t they have mastered the art of the master over the slave ,,…a psychological restraint that have impeded the mentality resulting in the need for dependency and to make matters worst,those that call themselves intelligent have allowed themselves to be hoodwinked,,


  13. To clarify: the Paradise NOT Four Seasons was a private sector project that went South. The government in its wisdom decided to bail the project. It was a government decision. They could have left the property to rot.


  14. @David
    The tenor of your post seemed to question the basic fact that government money had to be spent. Presumeably based on advice from the same community of interest. So what is your point? Does it matter whose decision it was to spend the money, its motivation? Is the money not spent/invested anyhow?The point is that all roads always lead to government for ‘big’ business in Barbados.


  15. Do the concessions to hotels involve Government grants or loans?


  16. David | August 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM |
    “It is unfair to judge Sandals before the closure for renovation.”

    I’m not judging Sandals. However, you should check most of the 250 reviews on Trip Advisor. Guest don’t care about care about pre-renovation service, they expect GOOD service each and every time.


  17. @Artax

    Adrian can confirm but before the renovation the hotel really had not sandalize. Chanes visitors visited the hotel with certain expectations that the hotel was not in a position to deliver.

    @Pacha

    The response was to an earlier comment that stated government doled out handouts on request for the Paradise project. It was a case of government taking a decision to bail the project. The issue here is that you want to kill the driver of the economy that is responsible directly and indirectly for 60% of GDP.


  18. David, my personal stay at Sandals Barbados in December last year was so far from luxury that it would take a dramatically reduced room rate to EVER stay at one of their properties in the future. Mediocre food at best, no choice of red wines, no Barbadian rum. I have stated literally in thousands of hotels in my 50 years involved in toursim and I would have rated the property 3 star at best.
    When it re-opens I am sure it will be better, but all this nonsense about increased airlift ignores the fact that it had 280 rooms prior to closure and will still have 280 rooms when it is refurbished.


  19. @ David
    No! The reverse is true. We want to, after 50 years of subsidies and so on, establish a competitive industry. Not the continuation of an uncompetitive one. In the current business culture failure can always to insured against by a childlike dependence on government. Your moral standards must be slipping to suggest that in the worst of times corporate welfare is to be at its height.


  20. @ David
    What driver of the economy. It is a false economy. As you will soon see. You subsidize travel to Barbados. You sussidize the hotels, You subsidize operations. You subsidize construction with national sayings. You subsidize marketing. When you the the cost – benefit analysis you may find the reverse is true.


  21. @Adrian

    To restate the argumemt, the Sandals brand is expected to have a knock effect for the market by spending marketing dollars.

    @Pacha

    BU listing of the rationale for decisions should not be confused for our views. Let us agree there is a need to pull our hand from the mouth of the tourism lion.


  22. @ David
    How can you take your hand from this lion’s mouth when you are being demanded to do more and more, year after year? There can be no end to this kind dependence, except ‘cold turkey’. This is an addiction! How are we to develop new industries, like nanotechnology for instance, if tourism continues to increase its demands on the the purse of central government?


  23. We haven’t read it but there is an article above about ‘child begging’. Maybe lessons were learnt from the hotel industries and those who run it. Indeed, begging maybe be the real industry, not tourism.


  24. @Pacha

    Which of the current sectors there is not a bucket of concessions, preferential treatment, tariffs etc?


  25. the problem is that govt over the years have relied on the one shoe fits all policy in giving concession out of fear from the mcguffies in the hotel industry and the negative articles which would give the govt a black eye and most likely cause them to lose elections,,neva mind the that the lowly taxpayer monies was being used by some of the hoteliers to undertake projects some of which were not for the sole purpose of achieving the goals for which they were determined,,,as long as the hoteliers are being given free reign without transparency and accountability the process would remain flawed,,


  26. Both governments have given concessions because like Bust Tea et al have stated we lack the leadership to float and support alternative positions.


  27. ac,
    just think that figure you quote of $16.9 million could have been US$28.9 million if Sandals had not paid US$12 million to the TCI Government ‘to resolve an investigation into bribery and money laundering’ according to the FCPA.

  28. Caribbean Lover Avatar

    “If your comments are true, then what does Barbados have to gain by having a Sandals here with its all inclusive model?”


    Well, there’ll be a weekly paycheck to each of the 300 to 400 employees; and the government will collect the usual set of taxes it normally collects from visitors to the island. Plus, the name Barbados might appear, a couple of times a year, in some of their commercials (When was the last time you saw Grenada or St.Lucia in a Sandals television commercial?). Other than that, there isn’t much more to gain from having a Sandals.
    Oh! if they decide to use the local beer (banks) instead of Red Stripe, that will be a plus. But then again, the menu of concessions given to Sandals by the Barbados government might render that null and void.


  29. @ David
    Indeed, so the real economy is seeking government support, not tourism, not off-shore, not knowledge creation, not agriculture, not local goods and services. Everything is based on corporate welfarism. That tourism is to have most of the welfare we say this dragon should have been slain. Look at all your captains of the economy, they all make their money based on government action. Something has to be wrong with this social Darwinism.


  30. Some of this dependency is can be traced back to many of Adrien,s article under the disguise of Govts not doing enough articles which play into the hands of yardfowlism and tribalism with pretentious applause masquerading as neither B or D but having the full effect and force of delivering a message of dependancy for those in the hotel industry some of whom are not deserving..Adrien,s continual fight with Butch and sandals brand is a deep seated resentment of butch,s competitive spirit which Adrien belives might erode the profitabilty margin with some in the hotel industry in.Barbados .i based my comment on previous articles where Adrien was fully in support of the Sandals brand entering other carribbean markets..now his drive to be crtical can be derived by selfishness and and a one man crusade making sure that the status quo in the hotel industry remain the same…hence his demonisng of the sandals brand as necessary to keep all pieces in place.


  31. ”To restate the argumemt, the Sandals brand is expected to have a knock effect for the market by spending marketing dollars.”

    @ David
    We’ll bet you it will not happen because it can’t. What will happen will be a new normalization to the sameness from before. And the false expectations will soon become accustomed to. The only change will be for Sandals aquisition of property risk free, but their other behaviours will be the same as the other players. How many times have we heard this promise before? How many times have these false expectations be our guide?


  32. The unconscious awareness of the captioned matter again leaves this matter of Adrian’s and now The Bu’s oxymoron. No transparancy – No vote – No power…


  33. @Pacha

    You maybe correct, we need to breath new life into the system by reordering the economic fundamentals and revamping our governance system.


  34. Yes David, if the people are going to take the risks, why have unaccountable people make all the profits. We are not calling for central government control but at least the people working in these enterprises should own them, not government. Something like a credit union if public money is to support them. You know we like the Mondragon model.

    A former colleague had suggested that the whole industry (tourism) should be revamped along radical line. His was to have the whole country as a unique destination. For example, even the colour of every house would be planned and everybody having a real stake in its success, directly, it is a plan for Barbados to be a truly unique destination, not just a copy of things happening elsewhere.


  35. @Pacha

    Such an approach may spoil the unspoilt experience but Bus Tea will possibly interject ‘unspoilt what!’. Such an approach would not be disimilar to what obtains in Bermuda, in other words, old school.


  36. DLP… “boys” on your own DLP media site..

    The conundrum for you is how an ancient people were able to build such massive structures without the benefit of today’s knowledge and technology shows your inadequacy. The implied conscious awareness of your oxymoronic ” Blog Master” repeats daily Confrontational – no way out statements with no conclusion and this appears the norm with this “boys club.” While everyone continues to do what they have to- to survive with less. You people literally get paid to argue in a secret upper class society with its Impunity. You don’t answer any direct questions about your Mandate just imply you are working to resolve matters amongst “yourselves.”

    Lucky, some can see your Plight.
    Take Sandy Lane, a community within a community. No dead dogs on the side walk..etc.
    Royal Westmorland the same.

    Perhaps you can site me to a DLP program that works…

    No transparency
    – No vote – No powers

    Let everyone see what’s really been going on as to why the DLP is Dragging its feet and dragging the Island down.


  37. ​Sources close to the project have attributed the delay to difficulties in acquiring certain permissions to import duty-free materials as promised by Government.

    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/jobs-on-hold/


  38. The head of the BHTA Sunnil Chatrani warned about this occuring.


  39. Hants

    Thanks for the links

    Kudos to Gordon Seale for his plans to spend $4 million to refurbish the former Amaryllis Hotel.

    Shame on Government for delaying the project by dragging its feet on granting concessions on imports of materials (a la Sandals) as promised by Government.

    Good luck to the O’Hara and Capaldi families in their plans to transform the Settlers Beach Hotel to high-end condos and renovations to The Sandpiper and Coral Reef Club.

    Shame on Government for its delays to grant Town & Country Development Planning Office approvals for the Settlers project.

    Good luck to Government to pay its bills without the import duties and other taxes waived for Sandals/Beaches and other projects, if it ever gets around to honouring its promises.

    Shame on the Nation for continuing to rehash the “good-news” $130 million Sandals story and the $400 million Sam Lords story.


  40. Hants and David

    See the comments from Cal Harper and Tony Webster at http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/jobs-on-hold/#156524

    Sounds like BU

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading