Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

We continue to follow the intriguing case that involves The Estate of Marie Stewart. It is worth repeating that the blogmaster’s interest in this matter is where it overlaps with a dysfunctional legal system.

One of the questions that keeps recurring in the mind of the blogmaster is when was the communication to show the Estate notified/requested Glenda Harewood to come forward?

What a BU source advises is that Harewood was provided with a copy of the Will at the death and thereafter elected to engage a lawyer to pursue her claim. Payne is confirmed as having advised Ermine in writing of her fiduciary duties as Executrix- only Ermine and Ursuline were appointed as co-executrix of the Estate. Where it gets murky is what steps Harewood took to stake her claim to the Estate when advised. There is the unsubstantiated view that Harewood delayed coming forward until her divorce was completed to avoid the inheritance becoming community property.

BU cannot advise if or when the activities listed on the invoice embedded below were discharged but it sure makes for an interesting discussion if…Again the blogmaster urges the aggrieved parties to convene a meeting and make a serious attempt to resolve the matter, it is not too late!

 


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

398 responses to “The Estate of Marie Stewart – A Time to Settle!”


  1. Piece…ya know Lorenzo seems to be mad upset with you right??? lol

    Both him and Enuff thought all this mess would have faded into the background by now, but it keeps building steam…UK got around 67 million people…everyone of them will find out about the PAIN and TEETS estate theft…

    Social media is making sure other countries are notified..I don’t know what makes them think this is going anywhere, it is not supposed to go away and has enough teeth and steam to last all of 5 years…just as long as their term of office, imagine what it will be like by 2023 if this matter is not addressed..

    There is something Carmichael’s name was recently linked to…they only need one something and if they find any criminality..that is it..


  2. @ WARU
    so of course the young lady would have been ADVISED FROM UK to write a letter of complaint to the aforementioned about the criminal acts perpetrated against her mother and her estate by the two named lawyers…
    +++++++++++++++++++
    Well then – is it not time to up the ante?
    You seem a bit slow of late…. and just happy to remain at first base,
    preaching to the converted … talking shiite about crooked lawyers…
    duh….

    Obviously if a complaint went to higher authorities – and no positive response has been received the next step (and the REAL problem?) is with these higher authorities.

    The next phase of the offensive is therefore not just about two questionable lawyers (among another 1000 equally shady characters) but about a questionable SYSTEM that facilitates, protects … and even breeds such characters.

    What is the point of pissing on the feet of the problem when the criminal is much larger …and when the feet are being provided with protection by the hands, eyes and ears?

    Time to piss on the head woman…and in the eyes of the beast. ….
    Wunna will be shocked at the difference in response….


  3. Thanks Bushie.


  4. David King & Co. may have been incorporated by someone whose name appears in either the Panama Papers or the Paradise Papers … hence the link!!

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    Another way that is possible is that one of the proprietors of David King & Co. sat on a board with someone who appears at Mossack-Fonseca or Appleby.

    .. even if the board was of a voluntary organization!!


  5. Getting there Bushman..getting there..

    We can count the amount of people who will actually take a stand against this level of evil and criminality directed by leaders at the population….on one hand, even less, the amount of people who are willing to do anything to put an end to it, don’t expect the UK to get involved..it is not their jurisdiction, but they can sure as hell revoke those sir Crooks and QC Thieves titles….that is why I pointed it out..

    Definitely don’t hold your breath on Mia as PM addressing this matter…they will all wish it to go away, not address it.

    The Stewarts have been pointed in a certain direction and they are pissed enough and driven enough , as is their right as victims of estate thefts, to see it through to it’s logical conclusion.


  6. Have these people ever heard of the fine art of picketing? Just appear at the offices (or public appearances) of the individuals and the PM with the appropriate signage and it could get vey interesting.


  7. WARU aka Abigail

    I just don’t understand why you continue to link me with everything to do with the BLP. Support of a party does not mean you are involved with or even know the players. Clearly you have no other line of attack. In terms of this matter, I will not be joining your mob of Salemites, promoting all manner of what appear to be specious claims, innuendo and plain igrunce. No I will not. And yes, the antagonist’ (or prtagonist) vidoes are hilarious. She cussed the dead aunt and called her mother a fool. I dead wid laff every time she says “my mother land”.


  8. The blogmaster’s read is that the land was part of the estate was it not?


  9. Enuff..you have no conscience, trying to discredit an upset person will not get you far, but her exposing this everywhere will get the desired results and there is nothing any of you can do about it, particularly if all the other victims who have gone before and are still with us…surface..hope ya name don’t get called internationally in any of it as one of the many culprits, of course I will not expect you to tell us if it is……it is all too shameful.

    At the end of the day, regardless to the nothing you are saying..the Stewarts have been directed along the right path…ya should ask THEM what that right path is, cause no one else will tell ya.

    I saw first hand the damage lawyers do to vulnerable people using a now totally useless Supreme Court …has it occurred to you that is the reason the court system is now useless..I bet not..

    Keep trying to defend the indefensible…right up until ya get another Donville..lol…

    ..remember DLP and yardfowls also used to defend the indefensible.


  10. WARU

    What is the indefensibe that I am defending?


  11. @WARU September 2, 2018 2:58 AM “Simple…except for the above comment..these days ah wonder what ya growing and smoking…cause ya projecting ya are one of these Bajans whom, when you hear the elderly being robbed or even murdered by politicians/lawyers.”

    You mean besides marijuana?

    I don’t like murder, especially i don’t like the murder of defenseless children or elders.

    I knew some of these politicians when they were nice little boys and nice little girls, but truly I don’t know them now that they are adults. Believe me I know NO politicians. I know NO lawyers. I’ve only ever been into a lawyer’s office twice in my life. I do not eat at the tables of lawyers or politicians. I never have. I never will. The thought disgusts me.

    My parents always taught me to choose my friends very, very carefully.

    I CHOOSE not to be friends with lawyers or politicians, and especially I don’t wish to be friends with lawyer/politicians.


  12. Yuh got to be an igrunt fool to be laughing at the victims of a bold face crime
    These woman are frustrated and plainly fighting for a cause that is within their own right
    Jac.a.ss enuff instead of laughing u ought to be asking Mottley to find it in her heart to adress this issue before the international media takes to hearing of the Stewart plight and drags barbados judicial system through the mud and it would not be pretty
    I know a few international lawyers and media associates who i have contacted in order to give this issue a bigger spotlight
    Then and only then the laughter would disappear off your fat ugly face


  13. David

    Yes part of the estate, and not assigned to one particular beneficiary but to ALL. Like you I think this should and could be settled, what I have witnessed so far though seems deeper and it is not what the Salemites discussing around the bonfire. The Salemites are too busy trying to prove that GP’s not being registered with the SRA in the UK means he is unqualified.


  14. @Lawson September 2, 2018 7:46 AM “I have never found bajans to be stupid somebody voted for these characters.”

    Man lawson, they fool we. You have no idea how liard and greedy Bajan men are.

    Trust me I know. Now.


  15. Whatever u say what cannot be overlooked and part of the driving force as the end all and be all is what legally gave George Payne the right to sell or place any of the estate on the real estate market without informing the surviving sister who is mentioned as a beneficiary
    Enuff when u can answer that question then i would listen to u until then i would listen to the victims of this horrible criminal act


  16. Ya missed. the whole point, I certainly don’t care if Payne is. registered to practice in England and Wales or not…from what the letter from the regulatory body implies …if he tries to practice law in England and Wales…he will be arrested for fraud, in their jurisdiction, because he is not on their solicitor’s rolls as he boldly put on his website…that’s fraud…we know that, if he got to practice law through some back door technicality in Barbados, his problem..and YALL problem…he should be blacklisted IN Barbados anD around the world as a questionable attorney..that is what happens in the real world..

    PAYNE DOES NOT HAVE A GOOD REPUTATION IN BARBADOS..so keep sticking ya head in the sand.

    What you are not seeing is that every lawyer in the island can be exposed to such a degree that they will not get any more business from the population…definitely none from international business and all of you will have to scatter , there are not that many of you..piece of cake to MAKE you move on….and see if ya can continue ya dirty tricks elsewhere without going to prison.

    As I said, I know some smart ones, even a couple considered dirty, who have already moved on…because the Court has become useless and they cannot wait for it to be fixed in their lifetime..


  17. @lawson September 2, 2018 11:16 AM “…some children can just appear…”

    But they told me that it takes 9 months to make a baby, and that it is hard to conceal a pregnancy, and even harder to conceal a birth.

    Or is it that you have some outside children here and there that you madam and lawful children know nothing about?

    Otherwise I don’t understand how “children can just appear.”


  18. Enuff
    After we lost Amused, Bushie held out hope that you would come to represent that rare enigma called the ‘not-too-dishonest’ lawyer..
    When the DLP were doing dixie, you sounded so committed to uprightness and transparency that you actually had Bushie thinking that there MAY indeed be such a thing as an honest lawyer after all…

    But alas… the BLP won 30-0
    You got your Board chairmanship…
    Now you are in the ‘ling’ and pitching marbles with the demons…
    while reinforcing the status quo…
    ….and sounding SO much different…

    Shiite man….What do YOU intend to do about the scourge of legal skullduggery that is currently destroying Bim…?
    Where is your loyalty….
    With the traitors, scribes and Pharisees …?
    Or is it with the saints (even through the local saints are mostly brass bowls… 🙂 ) ?

    What do you suggest the Stewarts do now…to get justice…?


  19. @ac

    Who were the co-executrix? Did the lawyers act on their instructions? Do we know?


  20. Enuff is a. fraud..there were 3 beneficiaries..all sisters, one passed away before all of this…the executrix was a beneficiary, in another jurisdiction, an investigation would have been prompted to see how and why she was made to suffer and conveniently die by PAIN and TEETS..when they were her personal representatives.

    ….Hal Gollop wanted the surviving beneficiary to meet alone with Payne and Marshall.. no real lawyer allows that for his clients…the daughter is right to keep her vulnerable mother away from those 3 lowlifes.

    The surviving beneficiary is entitled to every inch of that estate..so I should be asking Enuff..what was your cut??


  21. It seems all our politicians launder their bribe money in offshore accounts. I hope Donville Inniss sing like a parrot. Did Mia not say in 2013 she worth $1M..


  22. If only one of them had the intelligence which they were supposed to be born with, they would see where this is going..but not one of them, particularly Enuff, Marshall, Payne and Mia does…so there we have it, live, free entertainment for the world to watch… people are crying shame.


  23. @PoPo September 2, 2018 3:20 PM “It seems all our politicians launder their bribe money in offshore accounts. I hope Donville Inniss sing like a parrot. ”

    I hear that American lawyers charge $800 USD per hour.


  24. “The thought disgusts me.”

    Simple..trust me I feel the same way and I actually attended law school…they are frightening and good to stay very far away from, particularly in small island jurisdictions, especially where they are not regulated or punished for their many crimes against their own clients AND other people.


  25. They are so very nasty that Enuff is trying to project that the last surviving beneficiary has NO RIGHT to her own estate…despite everyone else, including any other executors and other beneficiaries already having passed away…..as the beneficiary’s daughter has been saying continuously…but so focused are they on stealing this lady’s property..none of them are listening, their intent is to deprive her of the property come what may…but guess what, Jackie is the best one for yall thieves…

    The executrix was the one before the last standing in PAIN and TEETS way and she was dispensed with by whatever means available to them…they could not do the same with the last surviving beneficiary because she lives in UK..


  26. I stood and watched another nasty lawyer in Barbados attend a meeting without his client, the client repeatedly asked him if they should not be at the meeting as well with the lawyers for the defense and he LIED and said no, he had absolutely no right attending that meeting without his client…this one met with the defence and made his own plans with them and never told the client what they spoke about……well the client made sure they had a recording device available the next time the lawyer called for an appointment and got back their file….no lawyer has any right trying to force his client to meet with the other parties without his or her presence as representing attorney..

    That unethical attorney lived to regret that lie..that is what lawyers in Barbados do..lie to their clients..

    All of these dirty things the lawyers on the island deserve to be exposed for worldwide so that people know and be very aware.


  27. WARU/Abigail

    Really? Your account is not what I have gathered from the videos. The death of beneficiaries named in a will does not give the surviving beneficiary sole ownership of the estate. I always thought the beneficiary’s share then becomes part of their personal Estate. You’re in your element, bumping gums. Waste of time commenting on this matter.


  28. Enuff…so what is the difference..the beneficiary has issue…namely her children…it is still HER ESTATE to ATTACH to HER personal estate and not the personal property of Payne, Marshall or Gollop to put ayy proceeds from their illegal sale of the BENEFICIARY’S estate to some white Canadian….in THEIR personal bank accounts..

    when will you learn that the estate is the beneficiary’s and had they done the ASSENT as required by law and not play slick with their thieving selves…none of yall would not be exposed and at risk of being removed from the population ever wanting to use any of you ever again…in any legal matters..

    it is elementary..but yall are too thieving to see…the beneficiary’s personal estate is STILL her personal estate…it does not belong to the thieving lawyers of Barbados..


  29. WARU/Abigail

    You clearly haven’t a clue of what you speak, so i am done. Let me go back to my hole and let the Salemites pissparade.


  30. you deserve to be in a hole, because ya are just as crooked as PAIN and TEETS and intent on stealing this woman’s property…

    las ratas pertenecen a los agujeros.

    your children and grandchildren will lose much, much more, just time.


  31. Enuff but how does your comment answer the question of the steps taken by George Payne to by pass the last sister a surviving beneficiary in having any kind of input In reference to the sale of the estate
    How is that step legal and who can such a process be undertaken


  32. They got some nerve, the beneficiary obviously has her estate in UK..which the lowlife fraud lawyers in Barbados think is too much for her…if she wants to attach her estate in Barbados to what she has in UK for HER BENEFICIARIES …neither you nor Marshall nor Payne have any right selling her property IN BARBADOS and taking away that right from her…it is none of your business..how dare you..scum.

    ..ah wish any one of you would try that crap with me…ya don’t know. HOW I WISH ONE OF YOU WOULD GET THAT CRAZY.


  33. They are all so damn crooked they still cannot get their stories straight as it concerns the last living beneficiary’s estate…worst still Marshall got in a national public forum and LIED about what transpired regarding the estate, both him, Gollop, Payne and the Judge involved in that fraud against the woman should be arrested…but the Mia government obviously has an integrity problem themselves.


  34. Y’all need to stop making wunna selves look igrunt. I gone, keep talking nonsense.


  35. We are not the ones being blacklisted..you and ya fraudulent, tiefing sidekick lawyers are…as someone said although I dont totally agree…all the lawyers on the island should be blacklisted…because you can’t convince me a fraud did not take place, and because you want to cover for frauds like yaself .. it does not mean it did not take place and you are only making things bad for lawyers who kept quiet about the ongoing fraud, but never participated themselves or tried to cover it up as you are so desperately trying to do..

    if I did not recognize this as fraud, I would not say a word….

    …from Payne lied on his website that he was qualified in England and Wales..that is when his fraud against Bajans …got cemented .

    That one lie followed all the other lies and fraud he has committed against his clients and the elderly for decades, there is nothing any of. you can do to erase that, it is documented in the UK and online.

    So you getting here thinking you can flip the script and change the narrative…no one is listening..it is already an international matter..why don’t you go online and try to change the narrative being played out on this matter….I dare you.

    That is yall problem to allow those two to bring each and every one of you down..they can’t bring me down, I would throw their asses to the wolves first before they also rob me and my beneficiaries.


  36. “lied on his website that he was qualified in England and Wales”

    According to gwp website:

    Mr. George W. Payne studied with the College of Law, England and qualified as a Solicitor in December 1974, having passed the Law Society’s Solicitors Final Examination with distinctions in Revenue Law and Commercial Law, to add to the earlier distinctions in Contract Law and Land Law, during the Intermediate Examinations.

    Where is the College of Law, in Mars? What is the difference between the Law Society/College of Law (now university of law) and the SRA? I repeat, stop making yourself look foolish. Then again, you argued vehemently that Roleric Hinds was the MP for St.Thomas.


  37. Lying Enuff the regulatory body said Payne DID NOT Qualify as any solicitor..not in UK and not anywhere else…Wales or anywhere else…if I had to believe the regulatory body in UK who says Payne is NOT on their solicitor’s roll and YOU…I sure as hell would not believe you because you are not the UK regulatory body..aint it..

    you are trying to convince me that FRAUD IS NOT FRAUD…right now Rolerick Hinds, MP is in a better position than Payne..think on that..

    The last person..Caroline Herbert who tried to convince a paralegal that forging a dead woman’s Will is not a crime in Barbados, when the paralegal was done with her…the stress took her to her grave..think on that…ya do not want anything with me…trust me..


  38. September 2, 2018 2:56 PM

    David

    Yes part of the estate, and not assigned to one particular beneficiary but to ALL. Like you I think this should and could be settled, what I have witnessed so far though seems deeper and it is not what the Salemites discussing around the bonfire. The Salemites are too busy trying to prove that GP’s not being registered with the SRA in the UK means he is unqualified.

    Enuff,
    The Land fraud victim has already proven that George Payne is not on the SRA’s register BECAUSE HE DID NOT QUALIFY!!
    THEREFORE HE HAS MISREPRESENTED HIMSELF TO THE TAX PAYERS OF Barbados otherwise known as FRAUD. It is egregious that yuh have a MONGOOSE WATCHING A HEN HOUSE and you are so nonchalant about this fact. Wha part you doan understand dat what he did is illegal. See the correspondence from the SRA, stop evading the issue………..maybe the relevant people will sit up and take notice….remember the recent Windrush Scandal in the UK… BARBADOS TAKE NOTE AND STOP THE TONE DEAFNESS, It will be interesting to see what happens WHEN the international media gets involved and Bajan Lawyers can’t nuh wuk and the families cahn eat jus like de poor people who they rip off…. this is not a great look for Barbados, very disheartening and even if the flames die out, this matter is not going away anytime soon (BACKDRAFT),…. these ladies are determined and have captured worldwide attention and the support of people everywhere, I salute them wholeheartedly………it is clear to see that these victims got stitched up even by their own LEGAL REPREHENSIBLE …………Greedy bastards deh want tarring & feathering wid some big rocks pelting at dem anyhow….day does run til night ketch it.


  39. And anyway…usually when attorneys qualify in UK, they also qualify in Wales, from what I have seen, the same laws apply to Wales…..same regulatory body..so if Payne said he qualified in UK..who said he did not…he should have added Wales…if he was not so hellbent on fraud..


  40. kindly post my previous response to Enuff


  41. “There are a number of routes to qualify to practise as a solicitor in England and Wales. The most common is the ‘graduate route’, which means taking either a law degree or other degree followed by a Graduate Diploma in Law course, followed by the Legal Practice Course and a period of recognised training.”

    Yall backwardness and thievery and fraud will bring you down..just as I suspected..yall are frauds only focused on stealing land..I knew if you qualify in UK it is usually to practice in England AND WALES..YA IGNORAMUS. AND YOU CALLING YASELF AN ATTORNEY..in Barbados..how the hell did you get a law degree..assuming ya really have one.


  42. A big freaking fraud don’t know that if he claims to have been qualified in UK as a solicitor, his practicing certificate would read that he is qualified to practice in England AND Wales….gone and put up fraudulently on a website on the internet no less that he is qualified to practice in England and completely left out Wales…FRAUD.

    If he had really qualified in UK he would have known that..I knew it..and I studied in US..not UK.


  43. Enuff,

    Just because yuh attend university doan mean yuh have cwaleefications, yuh have to pass de test so yuh cahn have de sirtificate….If yuh doan pass de final xzam yuh cahn get pon de SRA register and dayfore you ain;t a Lawyer. The SRA investigated de matter and confurm dat Mr Pain not pon de regista and nevah was. Dat means he’s a Frawd ….Nuff Said,


  44. Yeah Enuff…tell us why Payne did not have that he is qualified to practice in England and Wales…when it says so right on the practicing certificate…explain that..


  45. Payne probably took a lowly apprenticeship in UK..did not attend university and anointed himself a solicitor without checking to see where solicitors in UK qualify to practice…and ended up getting the information wrong and got the parrot Enuff repeating his error..lol


  46. Where is the $2.4 million ?

    How was the $2.4 million ” distributed ” ?


  47. To restore confidence and show transparency can someone ask George Payne to show his Certificate from the Solicitors Regulation Authority in the United Kingdom confirming he is a bona fide lawyer? ,,,,such a prestigious achievement no doubt would be framed and displayed in his office for clients to see his credentials.


  48. They probably spent the 2.4 million from the proceeds of the land theft..living large..did someone not mention one of them bought a yacht..ah hope the frauds spent it and end up in prison…they are all being exposed anyway…

    ..that is why they got their yardfowl Enuff on here trying to convince us that Fraud is Not Fraud..and land theft is not land theft and they did not rob the beneficiary her estate..but yall should have me to deal with ya would end up worse than Caroline Herbert.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending