Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by David Comissiong, Citizen of Barbados
SO  FAR as the Hyatt Hotel is concerned, I — David Andre Comissiong – – have no “olive branch” to offer to anyone!
I wish to state for the record that I have never said anything about offering the new Barbados Labour Party (BLP) government any so-called “olive branch” in relation to my case challenging the permission granted by former Prime Minister Freundel Stuart to Mr Mark Maloney’s company to construct a 15 story Hyatt Hotel on beachfront land at Bay Street.
The term “olive branch” — used in relation to the so-called Hyatt Hotel case — is entirely the concoction of the Barbados Today online newspaper: and I would appreciate it if that newspaper would adhere to basic journalistic ethics and refrain from putting words in my mouth.
Let me make my position very clear in relation to the so-called Hyatt Hotel case:-
In March 2017 I filed a Judicial Review application against the then Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Government, in which I requested a Judge of the Supreme Court to review the manner in which Mr Freundel Stuart, the Minister responsible for Town and Country Planning, had processed Mr Mark Maloney’s application for permission to construct a 15 story Hyatt Hotel on the Bay Street beachfront.
I maintained in my Judicial Review application that Mr Stuart had committed a breach of the Law of Barbados by failing to require Maloney’s company to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and that , as a result, the grant of permission to build the hotel should be squashed.
Mr Stuart responded by questioning my right — as a Citizen of Barbados — to bring such a Judicial Review application against  the Government of Barbados.
And when the presiding Judge — Madam Justice Dr. Sonia Richards — ruled in my favour, Mr Stuart appealed to the Court of Appeal against the Judge’s ruling.
This is where the matter stood at the time of the change of government on the 24th of May 2018.
Now that we have a new Government, I have been questioned by the news media as to the fate of the Court case, and I have made my position absolutely clear :-
 
If the new BLP Government wishes to see the back of this Court Case that they have inherited from the previous DLP administration, they would have to do the following things:-
(1) Firstly, they would have to DISCONTINUE the Appeal that was lodged against Dr Richards’ ruling! (This is important because the Judge’s ruling confirmed that we, the Citizens of Barbados, DO have the right to challenge in a Court of Law nationally important decisions and actions of our Government that affect us — not in our personal capacities– but that affect us in our capacities as Citizens of the country.)
(2) Secondly, they would have to CONCEDE that former Prime Minister Freundel Stuart was WRONG in Law when he granted permission to construct a 15 story beachfront hotel without having carried out an EIA ( inclusive of the holding of Town Hall meetings) in respect of the proposed construction project..
(3) Thirdly — and most importantly — they would have to CANCEL the permission that was wrongly granted to Maloney’s company, and would also have to give an undertaking to require the staging of an EIA in the event that Maloney’s company makes a new application to construct the said Hyatt Hotel.
If the new BLP Government is prepared to carry out these actions, then I would have no need to continue the litigation against the Government, and the way would be clear for both sides to negotiate a discontinuance of the litigation.
How any of this can be construed as “offering an olive branch” is really beyond me!
Permit me to also state for the record that I am convinced that once Maloney’s application is subjected to an objective EIA that the findings of the EIA  WILL confirm that the construction of any such 15 story hotel is NOT permissible because:-
(1) It will do tremendous damage to the physical and architectural landscape of Bridgetown;
(2) It will cause Barbados to be stripped of its UNESCO World Heritage Site designation;
(3) It will create massive problems for the Bridgetown and South Coast sewage systems; and
(4) It will impinge severely on the Barbadian people’s access to and enjoyment of one of their most prized and favoured beaches.
In other words, the staging of an objective EIA will disqualify the proposed 15 story Hyatt Hotel.

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

220 responses to “David Comissiong Has No Olive Branch to Offer on the Hyatt Case!”

  1. Freedom Crier Avatar

    I wrote this a few years ago when the Hyatt Matter was being Waged by Commie Sing Song…

    “IN The NUT SHELL, Try Seeing Pass the Rhetoric to the Ulterior Motive.
    Once you learn about Communist Tactics you can read and understand their Hidden Intentions.
    Once you know the Source you know Commie Sing Song is not about doing good, it is all Camouflage.
    A Bitter Fountain Does Not Bring Forth Sweet Water.

    He does Not Hide his Support of the Venezuelan Government who is Starving their people.

    There is No Communist Country that believes in Democracy but will use the same to gain POWER and then REMOVE it. All this talk about the people deciding is SUBTERFUGE. A Bitter Fountain Does NOT Bring Forth Sweet Water. My Spouse has a saying referring to leftist that “Even When They Tell the Truth They Lie Because They Seek to Deceive!”

    The Whole Issue here was Commie Sing Song Frustrating the Process of this Development so that the Hyatt Investors would pack up and leave the project LEAVING TE BAJAN ENTREPRENEUR WITH HIS LOSSES. He invested what was his not yours and not mine.”

    On this Date…David Comissiong
    Yesterday June 23, 2018 1:00 AM
    (See Commie Sing Song’s Motive & Objective Revealed here…He has Not Changed One Bit!!!)
    In his own words “And, of course, if the Court cancels the permission Maloney will lose all of the resources he would have put into commencing the project.”

    Commie Sing Song Sly Mongoose the Pied Piper. All out of his own Mouth and the Intents of his Heart.

    The Traitor within really Wants to See the Demise of the Society that it lives in. He Does Not Seek its Improvement, he Does Not Seek Corporation, he Does not Seek to Compromise. He may Engage in Shifts of Policy towards his Beliefs and Always Proclaim that he is for the Society he lives in. The Policy that he may Advocate will Bring Down the Society and Install Tyranny. All Under the Guise of Equality. But his Real Aim is, Always has Always Been and Forever will be POWER ABSOLUTE POWER, wither to himself or his Cabal.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2179855108695681&set=a.605439062803968.92120843.100000136403620&type=3&theater


  2. Wuhloss Comissiong laying down some conditions (or is it ultimatums) to the new Gov’t. In this layman’ eyes # 3 i( Cancellation) is a non stater unless the Gov’t is prepared to fight a legal battle against Maloney et al .


  3. The DLP propaganda machinery is hard at work trying to give credence to the story that now the BLP is in government they see nothing wrong with the Hyatt proposal and suggesting that the party is to sit with Maloney and ‘work things out’.Only fools as peopled in abundance and found among the damned lying party would accept this hogwash as truth.The crooked will be made straight by PM Mia Mottley or she and her party will suffer the icy hands of fate.No political party dare to take for granted the people and citizens of Barbados.It is expected that proper procedures will be followed.This is not a rake and scrape government of JA’s like the last rotten Dems.


  4. It should be noted that sitting MP for the City from all reports has no issue with the building of the Hyatt but …

    Bostic for Hyatt Hotel

    Sat, 08/20/2016 – 12:00am Barbados1
    But wants lingering questions answered

    While he is happy to see some development coming to the City of Bridgetown in the form of the Hyatt Hotel, Member of Parliament for The City, Jeffrey Bostic, has noted that there are still a number of lingering questions he wants answered.

    Whilst making his contribution to the Budget debate in the House of Assembly this week, Bostic lamented the fact that as the constituency representative for The City, he has not been included in any of the talks surrounding the construction of the Hyatt Hotel, and is not privy to key information about the project.

    “I try very hard not to be hypocritical and to be true to myself. I spent a lot of time in here during debates, asking for things to revitalise the City of Bridgetown. I have asked for a hotel to be located in the City of Bridgetown, because I think that it is a good thing and that it is necessary and that is the truth.

    “And I am not going to come at this point in time and say that we do not need the Hyatt or that we do not need a hotel. I, Jeffrey Bostic, Member of Parliament for the City of Bridgetown, I welcome and support the development within the City of Bridgetown,” the MP commented.

    “I also have to say that I know that development comes at a cost. I also know that development must not come at any and all costs.

    “There are several things associated with this project that I did not know. I was following the media… following one of the advocates against this project, and I personally like to have facts before I get involved in discussion,” he added.

    “My concern – and I reiterate I have nothing against the development – but there are some issues that we ought to be concerned about, and some discussions we ought to obtain.

    “I am not an engineer, but I don’t know, for example, what the impact of pile driving for a 15 storey hotel would be on the structures in the area, like the Bethel church, like the Olympic Theatre, like the London Bourne Towers, that I was advised was built on swampy ground, and really had some foundational issues when that was constructed.

    “I do not know, I am just asking and I am just urging the Honourable Chamber to consider these things,” he further stated.

    Bostic also queried what the impact will be on the sewerage system, in an already overload area.

    “Those are issues that I think we need to look at, and not only with an environmental assessment on the area, but a social impact assessment as well.

    “We also have to take into consideration the impact of climate change and sea level rise, in terms of doing any coastal developments going forward, because this is a serious thing,” the City MP concluded. (RSM)
    Section:
    News


  5. “Bostic for Hyatt Hotel Sat, 08/20/2016 – 12:00am Barbados1
    But wants lingering questions answered ”

    This is June 2018.


  6. David Commisiong instead of you cherry picking that one item which all knows was the bone of contention going forward .
    Why not lay out to the BU household all the other objections which you filed in the court against the building of the Hyatt


  7. In the major navies of the world like UK, USA etc a naval vessel at some point reaches it end of useful life. There are a host of reasons for reaching this milestone. The process is called “Decommissioning”. maybe ” David Commisiong” has reached the end of his useful public advocacy. i introduce the pun “D-Commisiong”, to be used in place of :Decommissioning”


  8. The Twisted “olive branch”was seen by those who have followed the case and the numerous objections that was filed in reference to the Hyatt as an easement or laying off of the pressure that you placed on the backs of the past govt while you played hard ball in getting your way.
    Yes your quick call also gave way and took some pressure from Mia to openly state she will meet with the developers after years of busing Mark Maloney
    The idea that you would frown on those who see your comments as an olive branch is amazing although in the world of politics such granting or easement would be called favourtism
    How is it that you never came forward with an easement which might have got the Hyatt started by last govt
    But somehow a magical softening of the heart by all things considered brought you to a different way of thinking and opening of the mouth
    It is hard not to forget your gladiator aporoach to the building of the Hyatt all filled with jubilant fanfare on the court house steps after winning and a placed where you prefer not to venture in reference to the Hyatt in the not too distant future


  9. History is a Wonderful Thing….Who Remembers these Words from 2016 on BU and said by Whom?

    Now the cat is out the bag a careful watch of these Neo Nazis should be a high priority. There language is dead give away of what they propose for the 166sqmiles.

    There idea of solutions are one of Total controlled under the of guise of nationalism. Buyer beware….

    Sir I grew up on browns beach when it was a 2×4 never heard any one interested in Brownes beach and its environment. As a matter of fact the fish market was one of the most disgusting sites laid along the shores of Brownes beach and everyone seem quite happy to bathe in the water which was polluted with oil and the odor from the stale and left over fish was a part of its decorum.

    How is it that back then with all the disgusting smells and oil streaks with children wading in the polluted water and sands of Brownes beach no one took notice or even cared about its environs.

    Now many years later like lost or never heard cousins all appear on the sciences as sole owners.
    Sir I took am an inheritor or part owner of Brownes beach I too must have my say about Brownes beach and those lost cousins who did not give a shit about the environs but pretends to know all and convince others that there input matters above all else.

    Yes I remember Brownes Beach

    [code lang=text]
    <br />Yes I remember Brownes beach fisherman plying their trade
    Casting their nets to catch for another haul or heading out to sea in the late of night in total darkness
    little boats or big boats it did not matter Brownes beach welcomed them all
    Yes I remember Brownes beach
    Ole rusted and abandoned boats graced the shoreline pushed against some old wooden ramshackle house
    Yes I remember Brownes Beach and its polluted environs on
    the left the gas stations with pipelines headed out to sea buried under neath where no one can see
    Yes I remember Brownes Beach poor children riding the rough waves on inner tube tires was all they knew making up for time and play all in a hot summers day
    Yes I remember Brownes Beach the sights and sounds of the crashing waves and a late afternoon sunset on a beautiful day
    Yes I remember Brownes beach not as a fair tale or a story like fantasy but a Brownes beach struggling to be in the mainstay
    Yes I remember Brownes when no one cared about Brownes beach just a small beach shut away behind a stench of foul air and old buildings

    But alas time has past and Brownes beach has change and new owners have arrived on its shores with issuance and warning to fight with vigilance and a declaration to be the rightful owners of a Beautiful and well developed Brownes Beach
    I too am Brownes Beach and I must have my say.

    [/code]

    No Mr Comissiog no one is trivializing any thing. What you seem not to understand that Brownes Beach does not live in an environment all by itself but is closely surrounded by an inhabitant of home owners, business people who not only see a beach but a decayed and derelict environment and wants to see a change that reflect beautification and prosperity

    A fantasy of Brownes Beach all isolated in present time and place is wishful thinking and one that does not answer the question of bay street: what has happened to Bay Street a place that at one time was robust and alive and indeed give the local business owner much financial support now all lost and abandoned One cannot keep burying their head in the sand in pretense as if Brownes beach alone would be the answer to those questions and that Brownes Beach alone can be the catalyst upon which Bay street can survive but must also take into full consideration that along the coastline of brownes beach there is an unhealthy environment that is old! Worn down and decayed that is in much needed help of repair the heart and the soul that was once a part of Brownes Beach.

    Mr Comissiong it is time you face reality that Brownes Beach would survive as it have through out the years but the Home owners and the business people that dwell along the highways ways and byways of Brownes beach and who have suffered the indignity of a once beautiful place gone to scorn are looking for answers to the dilapidated area call baystreet,The spotlight also should give relevance to their cause

    [code lang=text]
    Oh! Mr. Comissiong you asked for those of us to walk along the shoreline of Brownes Beach, to take a view of that beautiful landscape, in return I ask of you to walk along the area called Baystreet and tell if you like what you see.

    [/code]

    So lets talk environmental testing an all that good stuff related to Brownes beach, Now if I were jac.ass and born yesterday I would take wunna concerns seriously, As I pointed out in one of comments Brownes beach was the home for numerous oil slicks caused by cargo vessels as well as the fishing boats used for fishing added to the fact the were gas stations north and south accompanied by the natural gas company that had several pipes lines underground heading into the sea and such information could have been well known to Comissiong for years.

    Here we are in 2016 and now the issue of the environment inclusive of Brownes beach and its surrounding becomes an issue only after the news of the building o the Hyatt.

    My question therefore why was the environment not a burdening issue long before 2016 knowing and seeing business which had occupied the area had dealt with products which can lead to contamination of water in the sea and surrounding areas.

    Far from the environment being an issue the people casually took to Brownes beach unaware of any health hazard including myself,, where then was all this activism including activist David Comissiong who in his adults years would have known about potential and deadly environmental hazards in the areas of Brownes beach.

    Why now in the year 2016 after the damage has already been done does Comissiong care or does he? From where I sit I get this gnawing feeling that Comissiong voice is not a voice for the people but an attempt to latch on to another volatile issue which can give him an advantage to a full fledged political career
    Signed
    I too am brownes beach

    ~~~~~~~~~~~
    Sir I am in no disagreement with what is law my argument is with plain and bold hypocrisy being played out in broad daylight under a sinister disguise. Point being as I stated that when there should have been voices asking to see any environmental testing that was done or should have been done in the vicinity of Brownes beach and its surroundings none was asked. Again with clarity i state a public beach a place were all frequented and bathe and no one dare asked or speak out publicly to see such tested findings especially knowing of the hazardous dangers which might have unfolded over the years

    Yet now in the year of 2016 the drum majors of doom and gloom are all excited pounding their chest and beating there drums
    And the question is being asked why now?…


  10. It seems really quite simple to me. If any administration D, B, Q or X follows the correct procedures, then Mr Commisiong will have no case and will therefore withdraw his objections as he will have none.

    The DLP had absolutely no respect or interest in following any procedure which did not suit them. That is one of many reasons why they are no longer represented in Parliament.

    Should Madam PM instruct that the correct procedures be followed, and the necessary criteria are subsequently satisfied, I have little doubt some kind of hotel may well be built on that site. Whether its size or capacity will be of interest to an international brand remains to be seen.

    There is nothing remotely resembling an ‘olive branch’ here, simply a requirement to follow correct preocedures, something which was anathema to the previous administration.


  11. The Yardfowls should read and digest your comment using their best comprehension skill.


  12. Hell No not following the narrative David
    Commissiong not only insist on the EIA but filed a barrage of other objectives that past govt had to adhere
    Now he comes on BU playing the big pretense game as if what other objections he had filed did not exist and the only bone of contention was his right as a citizen to contest or be an advocate on behalf of the people along with the EIA
    Beg your pardon i will be dam


  13. @mitchlans June 24, 2018 10:17 PM “The DLP had absolutely no respect or interest in following any procedure which did not suit them. That is one of many reasons why they are no longer represented in Parliament.”

    Froon getting the taxpayer paid security staff to chase the media from attending a meeting on a public beach, under the guise that a meeting by a public official in a public place could be a private meeting. “Yes” that is one of the reasons I did not vote DLP in 2018.

  14. charles skeete Avatar
    charles skeete

    yes Barbados Today needs to be taken to task for their sewage ridden provocative headlines
    Typical of a moribund media with no investigative skills seeking to make a name of the misfortunes of others

  15. charles skeete Avatar
    charles skeete

    No one in his/her right mind would oppose development which might provide employment and enjoyment for others except the development was to the disadvantage of the majority so I hope Prime Minister Mottley holds all developers including the famous Mr Maloney to the high standards of integrity and fair play which she found eloquently espoused on the campaign trail.
    Her willingness to meet with Mr Maloney given her exposure on the political platform of Mr Maloney’s sins of omission and commission though magnanimous should be a stark reminder to politicians to take heed with their tongues when caught up in three euphoria of electioneering

  16. charles skeete Avatar
    charles skeete

    Ask no quarter Mr Commissiong and give none until the proper procedures for the construction of the Hyatt are followed
    and while you are at it
    check out the legality of that now sprawling project dubbed “The Pirates Cove” which has sprung up all of a sudden behind what used to be the Defreitas property opposite Laurie Dash on Lower Bay Street and which is slowly but surely taking over much of the beach front behind the property with artificial coconut trees almost down to the shoreline
    The speed with which this development has taken place makes me ponder as I walk along the beach on mornings if this project was blackowned that so many stumbling blocks would have been put in their way
    “These hills and fields beyond recall are now our very own”
    REALLY


  17. All politicians fight tooth and nail to win. However the messages now being sent by both Mottley and her cousin Commisiong is one of deceitfulness.
    Commisiong fight against having the Hyatt built was formulated on many objections many of which he is willing to forego expect the EIA standard
    And now Mottley willingness to meet with Maloney after her acid and jaundice attack .
    The question which is of interest would she demand that the Hyatt be built in height according to what Commissiong stated in his court records and which she also stated would have been sufficient not to have the Hyatt constructed
    In my opinion Mia knows that her proposals would not be sufficient to produce growth for Barbados
    She also knows and most likely understands that the upcoming meetings with the IMF would be of certain to be centered around questions pertaining to growth
    There is no question in my mind that all this sudden flurry by both Commisiong and Mia is mostly done to give Mia a chance of proving that Barbados has a card by way of rhe Hyatt which can contribute to barbados economic growth
    This is all a smoke and mirror game played to impress the IMF


  18. when I watch whats going on I think of Blanche dubious… i have always depended on the kindness of strangers… where does the money come to fund the trips to see maduro, where does the money come from to fund the legal challenges ..follow the money and you can get a real picture of what is going on good intentioned or not

  19. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    Ya right Lawson…from now on we even have to start following bajan tax dollars and pension money despues taxpayer funded contracts to racist Argentina to see how long the people’s money has been funneled to a racist country through the Williams gang of crooks, their business partner Bjerkham and their employees like Maloney and Tempro..

    Mia better stay on top that one especially since racists have always been evil enough to live off the backs of African descended people, particularly if they can do so from a great distance without having to look on any blackness while still hating blacks, it is one of their skills of survival.


  20. Can you really see it


  21. Because of Comissiong hatred for the PM Stuart he used the Hyatt as a political football to shamed the govt and in so doing stagnate economic growth along the bay street corridor. I know of a shopkeeper who had great hopes and was awaiting the construction of the Hyatt to breath fresh life into the baystreet corridor
    Unfortunately that person had to close the shop doors
    Yes motive and dadtardly intentions was the driving force to stop the construction of the Hyatt
    Now all of a sudden he speaks only to one area of concern
    Question Commissiong what happen to all the other objections you placed on the backs of the govt all at taxpayers expense
    It is so amazing how barbadians can be so easily brainwashed against their best interest
    The Unions also come to mind.
    All these clowns decided to way -a- lay their best interest for nothing.So far what is seen and not so pleasing to the eye are the white shadows of the underground who worked feverishly to defeat past govt getting their big rewards in the form of taxpayers money while the underlyings are told to pull the overloaded debt wagon
    I have absolutely no respect for Commissiong a man who like Maduro have his people suffering similar in vein as what Commissiong has done to the poor business owners of baystreet
    Yes Mia all would be watching as you now used the Hyatt as a bargaining chip to win favour with the IMF list of demands

  22. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    Between ac exyardfowl and new yardfowl Enuff…we really got our work cut out in the next 5 years..

    Yardfowls are inherently stupid because they are so inherently stupid.


  23. Both Mottley and Commissiong are so obvious. Both cut from the same cheap see through material
    It is truly amazing how Commissiong belives all bajans are stupid
    It is also amazing how the truth concerning the Hyatt is being manifested right out of Commisiong mouth as to whose interest the
    Wheel and come again not all bajans going to take to good having the wool pull over their eyes by wolves in sheep clothing like yourself


  24. Well,Well
    It galls to hear ill informed and unread majority Bajans speak of their support for a racist country like Argentina,a country which annihilated its blacks by a process of war and starvation.Buenos Aires the Paris of South America so called,haters of the ethnic african.If I had the power not one can of corned beef would enter Barbados if made in Argentina.Equally that swine Saurez of Uruguay who put up his hand to stop a certain goal by Ghana in 2014 and prevented that African country from progressing to the quarter finals in World Cup 2014.


  25. Mitchlans
    Exactly! But some people on BU know eveything. In fact, even an EIA is unlikely to be enough to result in a refusal, as they serve to provide measures for mitigation through conditions, which boggles the mind about why Maloney/DLP chose to fight Commisdiong. I maintain, however, that development on that site or any other site along that stretch must be conceptualised as part of the broader redevelopment of the entire pierhead. As such, a strategy for height, scale, beach access, public facilities/amenities, design, building materials, layout, preferred uses and their complementarity, jobs, training, improved pedestrian facilities, greening, RE, waste, water, sustainable and resilient design, wheelchair accessibility etc must be put in place before any grant of planning permission. One wrong decision, and the full potential of Lower Bay Street/Pierhead could be doomed.


  26. Oh and digital connectivity too.

  27. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    Gabriel…….it is very important we find out which other racist countries, outside the usual know lowlifes, who like Argentina could be very well feeding off the backs of African descended black people in Barbados and other majority black Caribbean islands….people they hate so much, but can find common ground with hatefilled minorities like Cow et al to help them steal from the same blacks they hate.

    Now is now the time to play dumb or diplomatic…this situation must be watched very carefully….the Mia government cannot pretend to be ignorant, lack of knowledge is no excuse….previous black governments were too stupid for their own good or the good of the majority population…this government has no such excuse, not in this era.

  28. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    Now is NOT the time to play dumb or diplomatic…

    Outside the usual KNOWN lowlifes..


  29. Enuff
    Agree with your point of view and I again call on the tourism development people to have another look at the concept of the Pierhead Development Project mooted and published in our daily press back in the early 90’s by the then Barbados Shipping & Trading.It included a marina,hotel,restaurants,shops,green spaces etc a development that embraced an area from the waterfront up to the Esplanade and all in between.


  30. @Gabriel

    Dame Billie Miller led the charge as far as the Bridgetown Development is concerned. She is an Ambassador for government and a former M.P. for the City. The ball is in the court of the government.


  31. I believe this would have all laid to rest if a proper EIA study was conducted in the first place, followed by a general public hearing. I would think in the best interest of Barbadians our commentators here would understand that! On one hand we had a PM trying to ram something down our throats as though a dictator would do, and on the other hand we call the opposition a communist for standing up and challenging the government on the citizens behalf. The Maloney’s, and Stewarts’ of the world don’t care about the island, only what they can line their pockets with.


  32. So if Maloney does not care about Barbados some of which was said by Mottley during the election campagain and regurgitated by the blp yardfowls here on BU
    Question. Then why all of a sudden is Mia willing to meet with Maloney
    why not let the project die a sudden death
    Why after all the damning remarks she made would she even entertain wanting to meet with Maloney
    As i said before the fly which hatched all kinds of eggs in the ointment tonspot thevHyatt project of becoming a reality now sees another opportunity to lay all the eggs in the open hoping no one would pay attention
    Commisiong..SMFH you are one piece of………


  33. The problem with you is that you are so stuck on a partisan position that you don’t ever surface for air. To repeat, based on media report, PM Mottley (get use to it) plans to meet with all of the significant developers of which Maloney is one. On the platform is position is a matter of record, she has no problem with Maloney, the issue is one developer receiving 80% of the projects.

  34. Freedom Crier Avatar

    The PM WOULD DO WELL For Barbados If She Stays Her Distance

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.

    But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.

    But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

    For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.

    He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.

    A murderer is less to be feared.”

    — Marcus Tullius Cicero 42 B.C.

    The Meaning of ‘Red Wash’ for Barbados According to Commie Sing Song

    http://moziru.com/images/drawn-flag-the-wind-drawing-5.jpg


  35. David
    There are none so blind as these catholic Dems who will not see reasoning when it is done.Stuart as far as they are concerned is the mostest and bestest PM Barbados ever had.PM Mottley is of a different orientation and recognizes that even if she complained of the one sidedness of Maloney being given over 2 billion dollars repeat,over 2 billion dollars in contracts compliments of the taxpayers hard earned dollars by a government that told the voters they were interested in the ‘small’ man.Which small,in stature? or size?,definitely not in monetary considerations ,otherwise Maloney nor Jerkman won’t qualify.Staurt and his lot of urine poor ministers will have their day in court one day coming soon.The people demand it.


  36. You know what they say, great minds discuss ideas, small minds go after people, events, inconsequential stuff.


  37. Mariposa epitomises the mentality of the last government–if you’re not one ah we, we don’t care bout yuh no matter what. She seems not to understand that the Hyatt matter is one of governance and government, in that Mark Maloney has a right for a decision to be made on his planning application. Yes–a right!! Their approach would have been to leave it and make him wait as punishment. Then she talks about accountability and transparency. PIMRP do.


  38. The question that should be asked is why does Maloney et al need taxpayers money, contracts, pension fund and everything else that does not belong to them worth billions of dollars and why did these dumbasses in both governments give them so much of what belongs to the majority population over the decades while ignoring the same population who elected them and those entrepreneurs and others who could have used those same opportunities and money to employ their own people and create a more diverse economy……but were sidelined and marginalized instead, for decades.

    we wait to see if the Mia government will continue the trend of enriching minorities only, or allow the 111,000 plus majority who elected her to be the recipients of contracts and opportunities to benefit their children and grandchildren into the future and determine their own economic fates devoid of the interference and attempts to create a poverty stricken island by minorities.


  39. @enuff

    Agreed!

  40. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Gabriel June 25, 2018 1:31 PM
    “There are none so blind as these catholic Dems who will not see reasoning when it is done.Stuart as far as they are concerned is the mostest and bestest PM Barbados ever had.PM Mottley is of a different orientation and recognizes that even if she complained of the one sidedness of Maloney being given over 2 billion dollars repeat,over 2 billion dollars in contracts compliments of the taxpayers hard earned dollars by a government that told the voters they were interested in the ‘small’ man.”

    The major “challenge” with the Hyatt hotel project is that it is finding great difficulty in meeting the criteria set for environmentally-sound principles (according to even the now fired DLP book of falsehood) and UNESCO’s guidelines for ole Bridgetown to follow in maintaining its World Heritage Site designation.

    But the overarching ‘problem’ with Hyatt is that it has not been able to admit that it has failed to attract investors with the foreign money to turn it from a dream of a scam into a reality to change the commercial fortunes of Bridgetown and to be a major contributor to the economic salvation of Barbados.

    Unless Madam PM Mottley can extract a clear and unequivocal confirmation from Maloney that the Hyatt project has financial backers loaded with forex to construct and outfit the hotel then she should dismiss him and his backers as just another vehicle concocted to bilk the Bajan taxpayers the same way they were financially duped by the ‘redesigned’ Pierhead marina project, the Sugar Point Cruise Ship terminal, the Andrews sugar factory upgrade and the Cahill WTE rip-off of which the now well-known qualified crook (QC) Michael Y was expected to cream off a cool $8.5 million in legal fees.

    What’s really is going on with the much touted refurbishment of the old Empire Cinema building? Is it going to be turned into a ho(s)tel for street vagrants and arsonists?

    Poor Little David Comissiong, if he wants to hit this Maloney of a Goliath giant in his Hyatt ‘temple’ he is going to need more than just a pebble in his lawyer’s slingshot.
    He is going to have to construct one big-able financial Bajan big rock of Sisyphean proportion from real rock hard imported cement.

  41. Freedom Crier Avatar

    David June 25, 2018 1:41 PM
    “You know what they say, great minds discuss ideas, small minds go after people, events, inconsequential stuff.”

    I Guess that is Why the Majority on BU Go After the Income Earners who Employ Thousands of Barbadians…
    Especially Activist Commie Sing Song who Envies Others that have more than he has and Seeks to Destroy them.

    Socialism/Communism is the Gospel of Envy…

    I Always Speak of Principles Unless the People involved are Trying to Perverse those Principles.

    Don’t You Understand that Communist are Anti Free Market Capitalism that is the Only Proven System that Brings Prosperity?

    Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff Barbados Communism is Really Irrelevant in the Scheme of Happenings…

    Venezuela Here We Come!!

    Just Saying… This is What Any Patriot Barbadian Wants To Avoid.

    https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1431/27/1431271238358.jpg


  42. @Miller

    If the project is not supported by a solid agreements on what basis did Hyatt sign an agreement with Vision Development to manage the hotel?


  43. We wait to see if the Mia government will continue the trend of enriching minorities only, or INSTEAD allow the 111,000 plus majority POPULATION who elected her GOVERNMENT to be the recipients of contracts and opportunities to benefit their children and grandchildren into the future and determine their own economic fates devoid of the interference and attempts, by minorities, to create a poverty stricken island of black majority people…


  44. Has any thought been given to the old hospital, recently burnt? That place has been lying idle for these past years and as usual with government property, has been left to deteriorate until it became a fire hazard waiting to happen.


  45. It is not beach front!


  46. al gore says wait a few years


  47. The problem with me is when i see deceitfulness on people the type that attracts Blp yatdfowls it irritates
    Btw Barbados needs Hyatt more than Hyatt needs barbados
    Think about that. Mottley has enough sense not to throw out the baby with the bathe tub despite her hooting and hollering about Maloney million dollar signed contracts with govt
    With the IMF looming at our doorsteps the gloves came off Mottley realizes that any measures that can bring economic growth in barbados is better than none and her abilty to present the Hyatt proposal to the IMF is one that is necessary


  48. Hyatt can be built if the Bridgetown sewage plant and South coast sewage problems are solved.


  49. Actually the problem with you is what caused the decimation of the DLP at the polls on the 24 May 2018. Don’t make the change in approach and see how it will retrieve the position in the eyes of an embarrassed electorate. The ask for the Hyatt plans to go through a process to establish if it is in balance with what is best for the area is not unreasonable.

  50. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David June 25, 2018 2:38 PM
    “If the project is not supported by a solid agreements on what basis did Hyatt sign an agreement with Vision Development to manage the hotel?”

    The operative word there is “manage”; and not ‘build and operate’.
    Hyatt would not have been putting up one US dollar in the construction of Hyatt.

    So where would that money be coming from?

    Who says that the agreement did not give the assurance that the hotel would have been built with funding from local sources with the backing of a sovereign guarantee including all approvals from the relevant State agencies?

    Didn’t Billiton sign an agreement to operate the offshore oil drilling programme?

    Now what’s going on with that programme other than there is no money to fund such a high risk venture?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading