@ GP
Hi Doc, good to see you still around for de New Year. Buh looka muh crosses doe, yuh see ah gettin invite tuh de “cross-over” club, what ever dat be? DEM fellas musse mad fuh virgins in DEM club but ah tinks ah is a bit too ol’ to be joining any club so dese days. DEM bess tek ah drive down by Pinfold Street and see wuh DEM could find down dey so. Wuh yuh say ,Doc?
Btw, he ain’t only ded but he well planted long time ago. But I onderstannin’ DEM planning a “resurrection” come de 20th. Doan let DEM in on the “secret” that DEM is got a likkle longer tuh wait fuh dat tuh tek place. As you would say. . . .. . .MURRDAHH!!

So its official. Hartley Henry practically said so. David Thompson himself started the process going for the development of the Thompson Dynasty. Anyone still questions the report of the deathbed wish? Anyone still questions his fixation on the prime ministership and his probable desire to bring it back to the family eventually?

As for the people of St John tipping the scales. That could have been easily orchestrated once the word was put out that it was the final wish of the maximum leader.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Bajans-against-the-return-of-Owen-Arthur/169948913020250

on the other hand OSA LOOKING LIKE A WALKING CADAVER

Georgie Porgie;

You wrote above “You have asked some good questions.
May I ask you for fun ……why should OSA gingerly distance himself from the BLP’s candidate, when FUMBLE has apparently endorsed all the nonsense that happened recently at the QEH RE DEXTER DOLORES DONVILLE & THE DIOTROPHETIC DUNCE?”

They are two quite different personalities. Owen Arthur acts while Freundel Stuart does’nt appear to do so until he absolutely can’t avoid doing something, and then it is often too late.

That Owen seems not to have reacted so far in regard to the “revelations” or allegations about the BLP candidate’s passport, and purported propensity for credit card irregularities, suggests to me that there is another side to the story and no strategic withdrawal might be necessary.

There are “rumours” of serious infelicities being carried out by several DLP ministers and top operatives. Freundel Stuart knows about most if not all of them yet nothing has been done so far and will probably never be done. Owen Arthur, on the other hand, moved a number of Ministers of his government for far less. David Thompson, similarly, summarily moved a couple of ministers for cause. He was also action oriented.

Re. the three D’s you mention above. Minister D should be warned that he should be careful to leave his door closed, and choose his words carefully, when bawling out operatives for indulging in certain actions that he himself ordered. Such incidents lend some verity to your take on the minister in the QEH debacle.

Thanks Check it out for your thoughts.

@GP

Not saying PM Stuart is not entitled to making a decision as he saw fit but the reason he gave is highly suspect. In fact it means the Opposition can predict his actions.

Barbados Today reports Michael Lashley’s speech that suggests that Mr. Griffith is really charged with assault on Shurland Moore and his travel documents were confiscated by Magistrate Birch in 2007.He has to report to the police station every Monday and Friday by 9.30 am.
I know it is only a charge and no trial has been carried out yet but why would you bring a man who is liable to be charged with assault to represent people.
Do not bring any comparisons with persons who are already in the parliament, he is now starting and therefore should be of impeccable character.
I think that in the process of ousting Mia they forgot to do a full check on his background.

We really need to use some commonsense here. Who would nominate a person to run in an election if that person has a court matter pending? If we assume that the BLP knew about the matter why would they not proactively deal with it to obviate the political fodder that would be made of it?

Everybody knows about this manifesto? It is authored by Freundel …… and he talking bout he was taught Latin and Classics etc. at Foundation , but never TREACHERY?

He displayed complete inertia when he was left in charge by Thompson, with full devolved authority. He DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for ALL those months Thompy was away on his sick bed. Things went wild bout here, and the ministers did as they liked …. EVEN DRAW GUN IN PARLIAMENT !

And Freundel using foolish analogy that as a guest in the house which the host left in his care, he couldn’t move around the furniture as soon as the man turn the corner! THAT WOULD BE TREACHERY HE SAYS!

Well Freundel, this following MANIFESTO of YOURS ON THOMPSON, is either TREACHERY OR THE TRUTH OR BOTH!

MAKE UP YOUR MIND FOR ONCE? DON’T KEEP “LEADING FROM THE STERN,” as Hartley says!

Freundel’s Manifesto against David Thompson and circulated by Freundel for the Presidency of The DLP in their landmark 50th Annual General Conference:

QUOTE
David Thompson for President of DLP in 2005

Delegates

The Decision is Yours

50th Annual Conference of The DLP

(1) From 1994 to 2001, David Thompson led the DLP; with a free hand to do as he saw fit. Did we not end up with the unusual act of the people of Barbados voting against the opposition in 1999?

(2) Where is the 1994 IMF Letter supposedly signed by Owen Arthur which was to be produced in Queen’s Park?

(3) Where is The St. John Development Plan?

(4) Why was there a mass exodus of several of the candidates who ran in both the 1994 and 1999 General Elections under the leadership of David Thompson?

(5) Why would a number of former candidates (who are still members) never want to take part in an election again under the leadership of David Thompson?

(6) Why was a BLP member Delisle Bradshaw (908 votes) presented to the DLP as a candidate instead of Undine Whittaker in St.Michael South East in 1999?

(7) Why was Patrick Todd not permitted to run in the City in 1999 as the preferred candidate?

(8) With all the supposed financial attraction in 1994 and 1999 why is the Party so highly indebted after these two general elections?

(9) By whom and why were the seats already lost by the DLP in the 1999 election later declared vacant?

(10) Why was our manifesto of 1999 distributed 48 hours before Polling Day of January 20th?

(11) Can anyone explain why the supposed most popular national figure as DLP leader save only two seats in the 99 General Election?

(12) What has transpired since the resignation of David Thompson; 6 weeks after the 2001 Annual Conference to encourage me or you to want the member for St. John to lead us anywhere at this time?

(13) What level of commitment has the member for St.John given to the Administration of The Party or support offered to the Parliamentary Group to justify support to become the President and Chairman of the Party at this time?

(14) Do we want to return to the days of INTERNAL HATE, INFIGHTING, BLOODLETTING, CURSING and RULING BY DIVISION?

(15) Can we expect a sudden resignation again from the post of President, if the member for St. John is not soon made the Leader of The Opposition by the other six sitting members in Parliament?

(16) Can we expect to ask for the support of the voters of Barbados, if we present to them a leader which they so clearly rejected in 1999?

THINK!!! Would you want the 17 candidates already selected replaced?

VOTE For Stability and Continuity
VOTE Freundel First on August 21st
Keep Freundel Stuart President of The DLP

Published By Those Dedicated To
The Legacy of Barrow and The Future of The DLP
and Barbados.

Mr. F. Stuart
Please let the People of Barbados, and especially the people of St.John know whether or not you received an answer from David Thompson in respect of question three (3) above before he died.

Did he ever produce for you, the dubious and elusive document called the St. John Development Plan? Did you ever get to see it and was anything in it ever implemented for the poor people of St.John? Or was it similarly imaginary like that IMF document also in your MANIFESTO at question No. 2 above?

Mara lied when she said that the BLP NEVER did anything for St.John, but tell us about this Development Plan that you yourself knew nothing about either, and you were so eager to know about when you published the manifesto above.

Fifty two years of representation by DLP parliamentarians, and nothing of significance to show for it! Wuh legacy wunnah talking bout?

I was shocked to hear the Minister of Education Mr R Jones acknowledge that he is involved in the practice of the occult. He gleefully revealed that he “travels at night” and that he speaks to David Thompson. I know the nominations were done at the Lodge school but is the by-election (and the Government) being run by the lodge as well?

This EMERA scam must be a St. John election and a Barbados issue.

@CCC you said ”I say do not listen to whatever the lying Barbados Light and Power Company management say unless they say not to sell the shares”

——–

What you are saying is that unless the BL&P Management say what you want them to say and not what they think best and that they should say, then you will not listen or agree with what they say, as you view is that everyone should agree with what you and you alone say.

Hilarious.

Then, @CCC ‘Emera scam’. What? Can the rest of us have some of what you appear to be imbibing?

Now, if you had said ‘maybe the Clico debacle should be a major part of the St.John election’, then I could see a point.

@General, why cant the parties not present a ‘home-grown’ St.John candidate, do they not think that St.John people have the intellectual capacity to represent in Parliament?

@ Crusoe
LOL, I was thinking the same : What is going on here today. Is CCC drunk, or is somebody else using his name? And what about Ronald Jones and talking to the dead???
On another note, Rawdon Adams and his emergence last year is VERY interesting. From that time I heard certain rumblings…….
Now even some DLP members seem to be in agreement with him.

CRUSOE
“What you are saying is that unless the BL&P Management say what you want them to say and not what they think best”

What they think is “best” will be best for them personally but not for the country.

When they agree with me then the whole country will benefit.

Does the Managing Director of Barbados Light and Power company own shares in the company?
And does the other members of Management own shares as well?

The country would like to know.

David you would probably forgive Mara if a she were to commit murder.

Carson, I intend to sell my shares, don’t sell yours.

You missed my point. I am saying that you would forgive her again and again… for anything!

@spratt

Ok, did not know you were blessed with clairvoyance.

@Kissmya

Is Dr. Byer-Suckoo a politician?

What makes a person a politician anyway?

@Kissmya

You are about to cross a line, leave the children out of the conversation.

I dont know David !
She said it —–
not me
She said that she is not a politician .

This cult worship thing is disturbing though !
This Dy–nasty building is not good.
Man appoints !!——————finish it,

David Thompson ?????

Everything happens for a reason.
DLP synchophants might want certain things but they might not get what they want.
They said they wanted to lower the cost of living too——–duh !!!!!

It would be very unfortunate if the recommendation of the Board of Directors of Light & Power Holdings is to sell the shares at the current offer price of $25.70 to Emera. Having paid that amount for its initial, non-controlling interest, the share price, for additional shares to enable Emera to gain control, should really include a premium. The directors should seek an alternative offer, possibly from a consortium of Barbadian entities (NIS, Sagicor, Credit Unions, Sir Charles, Sir David, Sir Kyffin).

Is there any truth that the person who Minister Lashley referred as having been charged in 2006 is a person of the same with the same name as the BLP candidate?

TRUTHMAN BURTON !!!!!

You deserve a reward, a medal , national recognition.

Go to the top of the class for reproducing the ‘Manifesto.’

you made my year !!!!!!