The WILL has been the source of fierce discussion regarding the Estate of Marie Stewart. Here it is for review and to inform discussion about a matter the blogmaster takes the opportunity to reiterate needs to be resolved away from the glare of the public. However, precedent has shown oft-times that this will not be the case.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
PAIN, TEETS and their co-conspirators are the WRETCHED of the EARTH and they are NOT getting away with it..
“Were the monies borrowed by Marie Stewart prior to her death which should be in the Affidavit of Value of such an extent that they would cause the estate to bleed?..”
Olivia Skunk is lying, Marie Stewart fired Payne for stealing her land and selling it…she did not borrow money from him…that is what land thieves do, accuse the Testator of borrowing money from them, when they never did, it is a pattern of nastiness that has played out in that stink hole of a Supreme Court for decades…they would bring forged documents…just to lie..
That is why this has to play out in the international arena..that is why they are desperate, they did not think their crimes against deceased Estate owners and their beneficiaries would ever play out on an international stage….this one has them totally unbalanced..lol
Wait..Piece…after giving us NUFF lip yesterday..ya buddy ENUFF is missing in action today..haha
No. The monies borrowed by Marie Stewart were after her death. I told her not to borrow money after she had died.
When did this termination of services take place? I can produce at least 6 family members who can attest that she did not and they are above reproach.
@ WARU
And so is Mr Olivia Wellington aka Teets due to the fact that he is with the Prime Minister at this substantive job heheheheheheh
One ting bout dem so called big guts menses.
When dem with Chairman Mia Mao dem does got dem tails between dem legs heheheheheh
And when Mia does stare dem down dem does avert their eyes.
Watch she de next time that she is talking how dem does shift nervously heheheheheh
@ John, from 1975 to 2016, there was no income to support this Estate.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The estate did not exist up to 2008.
You are saying that up to 2008, Marie Stewart borrowed to pay taxes and keep the land in order.
The land produced no income.
No one has disputed the claim that Glenda paid towards some of its upkeep.
Why not get the titles to the two sisters from 2008 after the decease of Marie Stewart?
Let each one decide how to deal with their separate titles.
The Stewarts sound more than capable of taking care of both themselves and their kith and kin.
@ Olivia Wellington Con Artist
@ John, from 1975 to 2016, there was no income to support this Estate. I am sure that you would understand how much it costs to maintain 10 acres of land for 33 year s plus another 8 years. Various attempts have been made to establish legal ownership over the years but hence what may appear to be the tremendous debts. but actually works out to under $7000/year plus interest. Ermine in retirement
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You have conjured up FURTHER FALSE PROOF OF numbers to justify BOTH PAST AND ONGOING FLEECING of the Estate and Bank Account.
@ Olivia Wellington Fraudster
When did this termination of services take place? I can produce at least 6 family members who can attest that she did not and they are above reproach.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are these 6 family members part of the make believe 2 Jewish Lawyer Husbands of you and your sister?
YOU WANT LOSTING WAY IN DODDS PRISON.
“Why not get the titles to the two sisters from 2008 after the decease of Marie Stewart?”
That is the crux of the whole matter..right there..
Payne refused to title the Estate despite being hired by Marie Stewart to do so , instead he proceeded to steal the land and selll it out like if he owned it..and she fired him, he then waited fo her to die and titled the land the very next day, by ASSENT..totally illegal..it should have been done when she was alive and waiting for him to do it…
Then..after Marie died…and he slithered his way back into deceiving Ermine….he again refused to Title the Estate for Ermine and Glenda through ASSENT..for the last 10 years…..repeating the same nasty criminal acts he did to Marie..selling the land without title….holding on to the Estate like if it belonged to him and Marshall..
Let me see them going into any court in the world and telling it differently…ya done know the CCJ will never entertain any of them with those crimes they committed against the Testatrix and then her beneficiaries..
Her first step was to sell the land at Weston and in turn use part of the proceeds to cover the debts on the larger property. She grew up at Col Villa and she did not want to cut it up and sell it to strangers. In her opinion Weston was more disposable and I agree with her. This was not an easy decision on her part.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here is what my half lawyer brain tells me.
Was the decision to cut up Col-Villa hers to make?
It was !!!!
In fact, it was her duty!!
Cut it in two and give the title of one half to her sister and keep the title of the other half for herself.
Same logic with Weston.
Cut it in two and give one half to Glenda and keep the other half.
But, such decisions need finances!!!
Surveying, applications etc etc.
Where to get the funds?
Why not go to her sister and state her case in 2008 once the will became available … or did it?
Why not upfront say to her sister that she has no money to probate the Estate (GWP charged $11,000.00) what should the two of them do?
Once she went down the track of making the Estate borrow she was going to get her self in trouble.
I am not sure if she even could but I am only half a lawyer.
Ermine Atwell as Ermine Atwell borrowed money for which Ermine Atwell is responsible to do a job that was assigned to her by her mother.
Like any other job, the possibility of quitting exists … she could have renounced.
The debts incurred after 2008 must belong to the Estate of Ermine Atwell, not the Estate of Marie Stewart.
Marie Stewart did not incur them … and I don’t need even a half a brain to tell me that.
All she had to do was speak with her sister and renounce.
She was not equipped to do the job.
If she did not have the money ($10,000.00) to bury her mother and it fell to Glenda, why on earth did she just say she was unable to do the job as executrix?
Ermine Atwell borrowed monies secured against her share of the property for which she and now her estate is responsible.
@ John, The land once produced income but as Marie aged and got sick she was not able to keep up with workers, etc. Ermine had by then returned from Scotland and was sporadically employed until she married Melvin and stopped working.
As I have said before, Ms. Harewood is free to produce evidence of support to her mother to maintain the Estate.
Circa 1986 there was a large fire and documents were destroyed including the deeds.
Post the death of Marie Stewart, Ms. Harewood was told to come to settle the Estate and she opted not to do so because she wanted to first divorce her husband so that her inheritance would not be community property. It was not a quick divorce.
Ermine was left alone to deal with the Estate and she stated as much in her affidavit when they brought legal action.
I am not fooled in the least by Jackie. Her plan is simple–show nice devoted daughter face to the world. Isolate Mother from her other children, have her make a Will cutting her other children and grandchildren out of Glenda’s Estate and she inherits all.
The most the estate of Marie Stewart owes the Estate of Ermine Atwell is the probate expenses.
@ John, in a perfect environment, what you say makes total sense, however this property’s deeds had to be restored from the 1930’s forward. The proper notices had to be posted . The land at Weston was a tiny strip that could not be divided. If you owned an adjacent property, you could purchase it to expand . Even Marie knew this.
The 8 acres at Col Villa had to be titled. When Ermine died she had just gotten the land surveyed and in order.
Glenda Harewood was given a copy of her mother’s Will directly after her mothers funeral. She chose to sever from Mr. Payne as was her right and hire her own attorney. Only she or Jackie can tell you the outcome of that. I am not aware of any lawsuits filed by her counsel.
Glenda Harewood chose to bury her mother. Ermine had a very good relationship with St. John’s and he would have buried Ms. Stewart and be paid in installments.
Ermine Atwell’s Estate settled her debts out of her share of the proceeds from the sale. Ms. Harewood’s money remains for her to claim. She was duly notified and I can tell you the date and time.
@ Olivia Wellington
Circa 1986 there was a large fire and documents were destroyed including the deeds.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
KEEP TALKING CRIMINAL
Spotlight, you are an Idiot, because Jackie admits in her videos that the deeds were lost in a fire so you are disputing her claim in your zeal to be contrary.
lol…the tangled web, the tangled web..
Monkey pox outbreak in uk
@ Olivia Wellington aka George Walton Payne & Co
She was duly notified and I can tell you the date and time.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You have ALL THE INFORMATION & DOCUMENTS AN INSIDER PARTICIPATING IN THIS FRAUD would know.
SO OLIVIA SKUNK NOW YOUR SAYING GLENDA SHOULD NOT OF TRUST HER SAVVY SISTER AND SHOULD OF FLOWN IN FROM ENGLAND EVERY SIX MONTHS .BY THE WAY DID ERMINE NOT HAVE FAMILY IN BABADOS TO CHECK IN ON HER.AND AS THAT SHITE WILL DOES NOT EVEN SHOW SHE HAD LAND OLIVIA SKUNK YOU ARE LEAVING A LONG STINKING TRAIL OF PISS.
I believe the phrase “real property” covers land. Actually it is better than delineating in come cases, Idiot.
Olivia, please stop. You are wasting your time.
Idiot Winter– I said Glenda should have checked on her affairs. I know that I would be checking on any property in which I had an interest. No Ermine did not have family to check on her? Cousins from overseas were the ones who discovered the living conditions
Not when ya have an untitled Estate and a back door sale of land that does not belong to you though….as the attorney who should have had an ASSENT processed and delivered to the BENEFICIARIES…AFTER Marie’s death…
Oh what a tangled web..
Enuff yardfowl..you are going to jail too, ya think these are so desperate to give this elaborate story from the elaborate fraud from PAIN and TEETS…and plan to go down alone..ha!!
@Enuff–Gotcha
Yall know ya are not getting away with any of this right????
@ Enuff
Olivia, please stop. You are wasting your time.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I STRONGLY disagree with your comment Olivia Wellington aka George Walton Payne & Co., wasted their time.
They foolishly have explained how this Fraud of the Family Estate and thievery was planned and conducted with Supporting Documents to the Whole World on Social Media.
THIS IS UNPRECEDENTED IN BARBADOS SHOWING HOW THIS FRAUD AND THEFT WORKS ON THE ISLAND BY LAWYERS ENGAGED IN FRAUDLENT PRACTICES/ACTIVITIES AGAINST THEIR CLIENTS TO STEAL.
I SINCERELY thank them for OPENING my own eyes.
“O WHAT A TANGLE WEB WE WEAVE WHEN WE GO ALL OUT TO DECEIVE”
@Olivia
Remind the blog the square footage of the strip of land sold and how it adjoins other lands?
David i miss the firemen blog. Can u post it again
@ Talking Loud Saying Nothing
Take a look at this story.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That is how it is done in developed Countries WITH DISHONEST POLITICIANS: this needs to happen in Barbados as we have gone over a Cliff.
Glenda Harewood chose to bury her mother. Ermine had a very good relationship with St. John’s and he would have buried Ms. Stewart and be paid in installments.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why does a part of Ursuline’s funeral expenses appear in Marie Stewart’s business?
Is this because she was a beneficiary and the executors of her estate submitted a claim against the estate of Marie Stewart?
Were the executors of the Estate of Ursuline informed of the intention to sell Weston and did they consent?
If it was done, how was it done and when was it done?
… and, again, …. what is the date on the Letters Testamentary of Marie Stewart?
@ David –land at Weston was 1034 Square Metres and abounds and abuts other properties.
OLIVIA SKUNK YOU SURE BET SPRAYING PISS AS MELVIN ATWELL SOLD ORANGE HILL AS STATED IN THE VIDEO THATS $60.000 THAT STILL NOT BEEN GIVEN TO THE ESTATE AND THAT SALE STARTED 2000 .NO EXCUSE SKUNK FOR THIS PISS TRAIL
Was/is GWP the attorney at law for the estate of Ursuline Stewart?
@ John, no, Ursuline lived in NY for most of her adult life. Her will was done by a fancy law firm.
Alan you are truly a moron. Melvin Atwell was a well known Attorney and the son-in-law of Marie Stewart. Marie Stewart was alive in 2000, What does that sale have to do with anything. Perhaps you should ask Mr. Atwell what he did with the money?
@ Olivia Wellington
Circa 1986 there was a large fire and documents were destroyed including the deeds.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
KEEP TALKING CRIMINAL
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spotlight, you are an Idiot, because Jackie admits in her videos that the deeds were lost in a fire so you are disputing her claim in your zeal to be contrary.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When you are deceitful you will try to put words in other peoples mouths.
i NEVER DISPUTED ANY CLAIM.
ALL I SAID WAS KEEP TALKING CRIMINAL.
WHICH YOU ARE.
Atwell, wonder if he was anynrelation to an Atwell who had a supermarket in Roebuck Street, late 60s early 70s….but he obviously did not do anything that PAIN and TEETS have not done to the same Stewart Estate for the last 12 years..and continuing..
@ Olivia Wellington
There is also no Zeal from me.
Based on your hundreds of comments on BU on this corrupted Legal matter the finger is pointed directly back at you again.
You want to call people on BU idiots, poor reading comprehension and derogatory names because they don’t buy into your lies and ongoing criminal Fraud and deception.
Not going to work even if you keep posting comments for the next 10 years.
The Executrix of Ursuline’s Estate paid half of Ursuline’s funeral expenses. She did not submit a claim to anyone. Ursuline had liabilities and no assets. Please read “The Doctrine of Survivorship.” It applies to Ursuline but it is tricky and I want to hear how you understand it especially when it pertains to tenants in common.
Spot Light–I repeat , you are an idiot!!
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 7:03 PM
@ John, no, Ursuline lived in NY for most of her adult life. Her will was done by a fancy law firm.
+++++++++++++++++
Assuming that the will of Ursuline Stewart was proved in the US, did the executor reseal in Barbados?
Did the estate of Ursuline Stewart have a personal representative here in Barbados?
Was GWP the attorney at law for that personal representative?
From the contribution by Clarke Gittens and Farmer:
“Resealing of a foreign grant Where an Executor or Administrator has been formally appointed by the court of another country, that foreign court’s appointment does not give the Executor or Administrator authority to deal with property in Barbados. In order to deal with property in Barbados the Executor or Administrator must apply to the Supreme Court of Barbados to have the grant of the foreign court appointing them as Executor or Administrator recognised by the Supreme Court of Barbados. When this is done, the seal of the Supreme Court of Barbados is affixed to a copy of the foreign grant and the Registrar issues a certificate confirming that the foreign grant was ‘resealed’.”
So Atwell, the attorney for the Stewart Estate and more than likely BLP in yardfowl category…husband to Ermine, the executrix and a beneficiary to the Stewart Estate….what was his role and how did Ermine sit back and allow her mother’s estate to fall into the hands of crooks from the Bar Association, the judiciary and parliament….
What a stench..
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 7:36 PM
The Executrix of Ursuline’s Estate paid half of Ursuline’s funeral expenses. She did not submit a claim to anyone. Ursuline had liabilities and no assets. Please read “The Doctrine of Survivorship.” It applies to Ursuline but it is tricky and I want to hear how you understand it especially when it pertains to tenants in common.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
That’s the puzzle!!!
You say Ursuline had no assets so I presume you are saying that her estate had no interest in Weston.
You are thus saying that nothing left her by her mother who she predeceased could pass to her estate and then to her beneficiaries.
She did not submit a claim to anyone.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Obviously, she was deceased.
I am asking about her estate and executors.
@ John, “She” was referring to the Executrix, Your understanding of the Doctrine is on point. Ursuline does not inherit. In a properly written Will, clauses would be included to say, In the event that Jane Doe predeceases me, her share of the Estate would go to her children or become part of her Estate. In my own Will, my eldest son and eldest daughter are co-executors and along with my three daughters they are beneficiaries. If Johnaton or Abigail predeceases me then their portion goes to their children. If any of my beneficiaries do not have issue and they predecease me, their portion reverts to the residuary.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.