← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Yardbroom

BLPThe opposition party should naturally take a principled position on some issues, when they are part of their core beliefs or what makes them the Party they are. Consideration should also be given to tactics, pragmatism, strategy and most importantly what is in the country’s best interest…in the short and long term.  In recent months have the aforementioned positions been adopted by The Barbados Labour Party? I am not sure they have.  This submission is not a “critique” it is a personal observation and I am sure others will have a different perception of events.  However, since I have raised the subject, the onus is on me to justify my position.

The DLP Government introduced free travel for school children.  In the present economic climate it is difficult to see how such a policy could be disadvantageous to those for whom it was intended.  A spin off from this initiative was the “perceived” influence travelling on ZR’s was having on young minds and the behaviour that ensued.  There are those who will argue this supposed ZR culture is part of today’s society and school children not travelling on ZR’s will have no or a negligible impact on their behaviour…I will not contest that view now.

The opposition’s position…as I understood it was that the money could be better spent in other areas, and was a waste of the Government’s resources.  Money can always be otherwise disposed of, you have to identify a specific area and then balance the benefits from that disposal against the free travel for school children, to make a reasonable case to the electorate.  If you fail to do that or cannot because of the evident benefits of the initiative…it is best not to oppose.

Now I come to the most contentious policy of all, which can have long term ramifications for The Barbados Labour Party: illegal immigration.  That a country should seek to document and account for all citizens within its borders is not only common sense, it is a necessity, a failure to do so would be a dereliction of duty.  How can forward planning be properly conducted? That a previous administration failed to do so is no reason for the present one to do the same.

The Barbados Labour Party made a number of cardinal blunders on this issue.  In the first instance they gave the impression there was no problem, but there obviously was and it was forced into the nation’s consciousness by the people.  Who in some instances had been denied an outlet in certain major media outlets…to be frank they were being thwarted.

There have been only a few instances where a blog – Barbados Underground – has been able to force such an issue into the body politic of a nation…it was the people against the odds and a Government that was listening.

The Government in a stroke of genius and common sense took the bold decision to set up a committee – some thought David Thompson was prevaricating – whose proposals now to be implemented wrong footed the opposition.

The Barbados Labour Party was left in a solitary position of castigating its electorate, or appeared to be and seeking support from the utterances of Barat Jagdeo of Guyana, a Prime Minister whose competence is still open to question by most Barbadians.  Some commentators on BU who have identified themselves as BLP supporters, and to be fair I have no knowledge if they are officials of the Party or delegated to represent it.  However, they constantly make the point that Professor x or Professor y has said this or that, so we should follow.

We always respect scholarship and education in Barbados, more so from eminent scholars in various fields of endeavour, but if “education” is to mean anything we should be able to analyse and think for ourselves and to know “why” we have arrived at a decision after studying “all” the evidence available.  That is what real education is about, to constantly harp on about certain Professors in an effort to stifle debate or undermine free thinking people, shows a lack of human understanding and how to positively interact with others.

I believe The Barbados Labour Party has chosen to oppose when it was not necessary to do so, thus giving the impression “erroneously” that Barbadians have a second place in their thoughts.

A balanced position would have been: we understand what the Government is doing and why they are doing it, we do not object in principle but there are certain issues relating to the overall policy we would have handled differently.  It is quite obvious some will say if they do not believe the above, why should they say it?

I say time will be the final “arbiter” in this issue and I contend it is not  wise for the opposition Party to “always” oppose.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Rumplestilskin // June 22, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Many of the millionaires who frequented here previously, are much less rich, some no longer millionaires.

    ++++++++++++++++++

    Let me help you son:

    “The United States has a mean wealth of $144,000 per person, the highest in the world, while India has a mean wealth of only $6,500 (the poorest of those for which data was available).

    However, in the US, wealth concentration is among the highest of those countries with sufficient data to make these calculations.

    According to the report, the top one percent of the population in the US owns 32.7 percent of the wealth, trailing only Switzerland, where the top one percent owns 34.8 percent. However, the US figure excludes the very richest families that are included in the list of Forbes billionaires. If these were included, the share owned by the top one percent would rise to 34.7 percent.

    The report has data only on the share owned by the top one percent for 12 countries. Other countries with a particularly high share of wealth owned by the top one percent include Denmark (25 percent), Indonesia (28.7 percent) and the UK (23 percent).

    The UN figures indicate that 45.5 percent of the US adult population (or about 92 million people) is in the top 10 percent of the world’s population by wealth.

    However, to qualify for the top 10 percent requires total assets of only $61,041.

    For the bulk of American workers who reach this level, the majority of these assets are tied up in their homes and vehicles.

    A US census report based on 2000 data found that 67 percent of the population reported ownership of a home, and that the median net worth of this house (that is, the value of the house minus mortgages) amounted to $59,000.”

    Ten per cent of the American population is reaaly 10% of 306 million or 30 million, six hundred thousand.

    Seems like all the BTA has to do is target 0.00005% of the American population.

  2. Rumplestilskin Avatar
    Rumplestilskin

    I have gone and scared Scout. ”Are you then telling me to accomodate these migrat regionalist, you would “tek up” 2 1/2 acres of my land? You got to be MADDDDD. Over my dead body anbd a lot more too.”

    +++++++

    No Scout Sir. No one would take your property.

    But, if it is on a property currently classified as agricultural, a new land use policy would prohibit this every being converted.

    A new land use policy, would ensure, that if you ever sold it for development, there would be a maximum per lot size, to ensure adequate housing availability from such an area.

    Maybe a half acre, maybe x square feet.

    Such a policy needs legislation to give it teeth.

    One can put it off, or complain that we should own however much we want, but in the greater good, such a policy is necessary.

    As for the reference above by another, to socialist policies, that is neither relevant nor accurate.

    This is about usage of a limited resource, nothing more nor less.

    Peace


  3. But why should Scout have 3 acres and I can only have 4000 sq ft (regardless of the amount of money I am willing to spend?)

    Contrary to popular opinion, there is no shortage of land for housing. What is the problem is the price people are asking for land. Let’s say that by law, house lots must be no larger than 5000 sq ft. What’s to stop a purchaser from buying more than one adjacent lot so as to acquire a larger portion of land?

    However as I stated before, the majority of the subdivision of agricultural land for housing and some other purposes (racetrack at Vaucluse, or a church at Staple Grove) has been by and for Bajans; hardly “blood-sucking vampiric creatures”.


  4. This guy Hog Squeal is either a decoy or a total idiot. I think the DLP is planting him/her to write bare nonsense on this blog site which then discredit Mia Mottley who he advises.

    Does he/she really work in the Leader of the Opposition’s office? As what? The driver? Obviously not as a researcher or serious office-holder.

    It is clear what is hurting the Bees: they have been on the wrong side of several critical issues – Clico, Immigration are two issues of note. Where is the party going on these except to the eternal discredit of its leader? They play so easily into the hands of David Thompson.

    I have heard even strong BLP supporters saying that they support David Thompson 100 on this immigration thing.

    One thing about Owen Arthur is that he did not suffer fools gladly – I would know because he taught me twenty years ago (whenever he was sober)! Is that the reason for his silence?

    Either Hog Squeal is a decoy or and idiot or the Opposition Leader is worse off than I thought.


  5. What is exactly that the DLP is doing that the BLP has been opposing for opposing sake?

    Certainly not in Parlaiment. On the few occasions it meets, what little that comes there that make sense, is BLP policy.

    Here is what Parliament discussed since January 2009:

    The National Assistance (amendment) Act, 2009

    The Supplementary Appropriation Act, 2009

    Value Added Tax (amendment) Act, 2009

    Income Tax (amendment) Act, 2009

    Property Transfer Tax, Act

    Appropriations Act, 2009

    Land Tax (amendment) Act, 2009

    Constituency Councils Act

    Vesting of the Old Fish Market at Bay Street

    Caribbean Court of Justice Act

    Constitution (amendment) 79G

    Anti-money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (Prevention and Control) Act, 2009

    Criminal Appeals Act

    Liquor Licenses Act

    University of the West Indies Guarantee of Loans, Act

    Port Authority Guarantee Resolution

    The only two which the BLP opposed was the Constituency Coucil Bill, where Sinckler will hand-pick 250 persons to serve.

    The NAB Act was amended just so the DLP could move the number of people on the Board from 7 to 9.

    What is the DLP really doing at Parliament?

    There is nothing happening there for the BLP to oppose or even comment on, as the Sitting could take five minutes each time the House meets – with the majority of that time taken up with prayers.

    I will tell you about 2008 later. But it is more of the same!!!!


  6. What is “IT” exactly that the DLP is doing that the BLP has been opposing for opposing sake?


  7. Since when was parliament relevant to the Bees? Most of the decisions that hurt us between 1994 and 2008 never saw parliament.


  8. Who said that colonialism is dead? Massa still leading us.

    There is more in common between a Guyanese and a Bajan than there is between a Bajan and a Englishman, but yet the Englishman has managed to set Bajans and Guyanese at war with each other.

    On the plantation, massa (Englishman) was able set the house slaves against the field slaves by making the house slaves feel that they were more important than the field slaves. Once the house slaves bought and accepted the big lie they started mistreating their brothers and sisters in the field. They spied on them and inform massa of everything the field slaves said and did.

    This is the same tactic being used today to set Guyanese against Bajans. A small vocal group of Bajans have bought the big white lie that Barbadians are more important than the others in the rest of the region and that they need us but we done need them. This is the ploy being used by this “throw back” of colonialism, David Thompson, who has managed to get not only Bajans against Guyanese but has also succeeded in triggering an atmosphere of suspicion amongst other nationals in Caribbean.

    Today, the union we started to build, with much success is in jeopardy and the survival and livelihood of our peoples in the region are at stake. Europe has build a union that today serves the social and economic mobility of its people, but here in the Caribbean we have fallen once again for the oldest political trick in the book. We have allowed this Englishman “New Age Massa” David Thompson to single handedly destroyed our union.

    Barbados’ new immigration policy has nothing to do with protecting our borders or defending the interest of Barbadians. In fact, it is more about protecting the wicket and immoral deeds of Thompson and hiding the truth from Barbadians. We would be shock but far more enlightened if we knew the real reason behind Thompson’s policy, which is directed specifically and deliberately at Guyanese.

    Mr. Fario and Mr. Jagdeo would want to do some investigations surrounding the departure of a young Guyanese lady from Barbados and the abuse she experienced while here. If this young lady is willing to confirm the abuse and mistreatment she received at the hands of Mr. Thompson, then every effort should made, on the part of the Guyanese Officials to bring the matter before the Human Rights tribunal at the United Nations. In addition, every woman and women’s group in Barbados that value their dignity should condemn the abuse suffered by this young lady.

    On January 6, 2008, nine days before the general election a young Guyanese lady by the name of Patina Agustine was sent back to Guyana by Mr. Thompson with the understanding that she would be allowed to return following the completion of the election.

    Ms. Agustine’s sojourn in Barbados was in search of a better life that ended up in total disaster. Her search was for nothing more than what Bajans searched for when they journeyed to England, USA, Panama, Guyana, Canada and other places in the 50s, 60s, 70s, and even today. What this young lady found has now become a depressed story that included regular sexual escapades with Mr. Thompson, the exponent of the Family First. The acts indulged in during these escapades ranged from cocaine use to sadism, where the ends of burning cigarettes were placed on her buttocks to heighten the sexual pleasure of pain.

    It is the vehicle, registration number G7096, belonging to one Mr. Herbert Crichlow of 2nd Avenue, Lower Newbury, St George that was used by Mr. Thompson to transport Ms. Agustine. Ms. Agustine now feels used and abused by Thompson and feels that his refusal to let her back into the country is an act of bad faith.

    I hold no sympathy for Ms. Agustine. In fact, the disrespect she showed herself and women in general is not the issue here. My concern is at the level of the man with whom she was involved and the kind of moral values he holds not only for himself and his family but also the women folk of this country and the example he sets for our children.

    Ms. Agustine is willing to share her disappointment with the media and I wish her well. Sadly, it is for her willingness to share her sad story with the media that she and many of her countrymen will not be permitted to enter this country again.

    Barbadians have a much bigger problem to solve. That our Nation is now in verbal combat with the rest of the region for policies that bear no relevance to our advancement as a people is most unfortunate. That a Prime Minister would engage state apparatus to protect his personal immoral acts is frightening. What can we expect next Thompson?

  9. Wishing in Vain Avatar
    Wishing in Vain

    This story has more to do with Mottley’s style of sex than anything else.

    Sadly you are corrupt of thought and mind go get a life you scum bag.

    Seems not even your Senators have any respect or regard for your leaders as I was told by those that should know that yet another day has passed and neither of them saw it necessary to be present for their sitting today.

    At least owing had the sense to at least put in an appearance and then leave the zone but these two are so confused that neither of them care to so.

    Then again with the number of headaches Mr Kerrie has on his hands for his laying in waiting to see when his former wife got home and then launching into an unmercyful beating of her to a pulp ( seems like these BLP love to beat and bite up ) leading to criminal charges having to be laid, also to his head must be hot with the number that he tried to pull on a Dr Boolani where he received money for services he never delivered.

    Or Liz maybe trying to tidy up some of her mess with some contracts she awarded to hubby while in office, I understand that COW now better understands why she avoided him at all cost, he also now better understands her dishonesty while serving as a Minister.


  10. Camper // June 24, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Since when was parliament relevant to the Bees? Most of the decisions that hurt us between 1994 and 2008 never saw parliament.
    +++++++++++++++++++++

    What?

    Unemployment at 6.7 per lower than even when Barrow was PM;

    Over $2.7 billion in foreign exchange, the most ever.

    Are you talking about progressive legislation that had a transforming effect on the Barbadians society, such as the Public Service Act, the Scotland District Authority Act; logical amendements to the Income Tax Act such as would provide for the first $25,000 tax free?

    You could not be talking about the 8% cut, that was the DLP.


  11. Camper // June 24, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Since when was parliament relevant to the Bees?

    Most of the decisions that hurt us between 1994 and 2008 never saw parliament.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    “Hurt us who?

    You mean that kept the DLP in Opposition for 14 years, before Clico’ millions came along?

    LIST ONE BAD DECISION MADE BY THE BLP BETWEEN 1994 – 2008?

  12. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Camper trust me it was no Clico millions it was the average persons in the street that was ready to bid the corruption so long and farewell, ordinary people like you and I helped remove these crooks of the BLP from the corridors of Parliament..

    Trust me if money won elections Owing and Mascot would be sitting pretty because Owing would be Leader and Mascot CoLeader, remember they money that they tried to giveaway in the Farm until they were stopped by ordinary citizens???

  13. Straight talk Avatar

    WIV:

    Remember the evidence brandished at public meetings, remember the forensic audits?

    Shut your mouth until you can face the electorate and say “we have broken the mould” as promised, but not delivered.

  14. Rumplestilskin Avatar
    Rumplestilskin

    Per Bloomberg:

    June 21 (Bloomberg) — Banks in North Carolina, Georgia and Kansas with combined assets of $1.5 billion were seized by regulators last week, costing the U.S. insurance fund $363 million and pushing this year’s tally of failures to 40.

    Southern Community Bank of Fayetteville, Georgia, and 111- year-old Cooperative Bank in Wilmington, North Carolina, were closed June 19 by state officials, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency shut First National Bank of Anthony, Kansas. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was named receiver.

    Southern Community’s $307 million in deposits were bought by United Community Bank of Blairsville, Georgia, and most of Cooperative’s $774 million in deposits went to First Bank in Troy, North Carolina, the FDIC said. Bank of Kansas in South Hutchinson acquired First National’s $142.5 million in deposits. The acquiring banks are assuming a combined $1.47 billion in assets, mostly loans, and signed agreements with the FDIC to share more than 80 percent losses with the government.

    “The loss-sharing arrangement is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector,” the FDIC said in each statement. “The agreement also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.”

    Regulators this year have closed the most banks since 1993 as a loss of 6 million jobs since the recession began contributes to mounting home foreclosures and loan delinquencies. The U.S. economy contracted at a 5.7 percent annual pace in the first quarter. More than a quarter of all states have unemployment rates higher than 10 percent, the Labor Department said last week.

    Assessment Fee

    The regulator estimates the seizures will cost the deposit insurance fund $363 million, led by $217 million for Cooperative Bank. The reserve in the first quarter fell 25 percent from the previous year, to $13 billion — the lowest since September 1993. The FDIC in May imposed an emergency fee to raise $5.6 billion to rebuild the fund, with more assessments possible.

    Cooperative Bank, the biggest of the three to fail June 19, was considered undercapitalized after an FDIC review last year and had entered agreements with federal and state regulators, including an April 24 accord with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, on capital and management.

    The bank halted or slowed writing loans held for investment in the fourth quarter to comply with orders to improve capital ratios, according to a May 20 statement from the company.

    Southern Community in October said it overhauled operations and raised capital in an attempt to survive, after receiving an order from the FDIC, according to a regulatory filing in November. The bank replaced Chief Executive Officer Gary McGaha with Dave Coxon and raised $2 million to weather additional loan losses, the statement said.

    ‘Substantial Dissipation’

    First National Bank had “substantial dissipation” of assets, earnings and losses depleted most capital, and “no reasonable prospect” of becoming adequately capitalized without federal assistance, the OCC said in a statement.

    Southern Community’s five offices opened yesterday as branches of United Community, and Cooperative’s 24 branches will open tomorrow as part of First Bank. Six offices of First National will open under normal business hours as branches of Bank of Kansas, the FDIC said.

    As many as 1,000 U.S. banks could fail in the next three to five years on losses related to commercial real estate loans, RBC Capital Markets analysts said in February. The FDIC estimates U.S. bank failures through 2013 may cost $70 billion.

    The FDIC classified 305 banks as “problem” institutions in the first quarter, a 21 percent jump from the fourth quarter and the highest since 1993, the agency said May 27. The agency doesn’t identify problem lenders.

    The FDIC insures deposits at more than 8,220 institutions with $13.5 trillion in assets.

    To contact the reporters on this story: Margaret Chadbourn in Washington at mchadbourn@bloomberg.net; Ari Levy in San Francisco at alevy5@bloomberg.net.

    Last Updated: June 22, 2009 10:52 EDT

    +++++++++++

    So, 2009 has seen the most banks shut since 1993, up to 1000 could fail in the next three to five years, but Hogsqueal thinks that the US economy is coming out of recession.

    Maybe Hogsqueal can cantact the US Treasury and offer his/ her services, as he/she must be tremendously clever to have much better understanding than us all.

    Peace

  15. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Fear not, relax, set your soul free, who needs to be proven crooks will be proven crooks, fear not.

    Democracy is a wonderful blessing is it not??

  16. Straight talk Avatar

    Fear?

    I’m only afraid that you, once in the vanguard of exposing wrongdoing, are now the pathetic apologist for the establishment cover-up.

    Remember when you had credibility, you told us over a year ago prosecutions are coming.

    Same old, same old.

  17. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    I would not be so pompous as to try to tell the PM how or when he should release information regarding the findings of any of the forensic audits that he has ordered and I would also suggest that neither should you believe that you are capable to do so either, what I do know is that the PM is not foolish to the fact people want to know and hear the results but neither me nor you can dictate to him what he needs to do with the release of this information.

    As for your comment Same old, same old.
    That is indeed baseless when one considers the swift action this gov’t has taken to tidy up the mess of DANOS 3 S. Housing, Rural and Urban, SSA and Water Authority.


  18. In his column in today’s Barbados Advocate, hartley henry, a.k.a, ($155,000 highly paid principle political adviser ) Wishinh In Vain, wrote:

    “Mr. Swine Flu, we are going to do everything in our power to remove and eradicate you from this country. But we are not going to blame you for what others overlooked and sidestepped and what now has to be done in the national interest. There is more to politics than politricks!:

    ++++++++++++++++++

    Is it not true that David Thompson and the DLP pose an even greater threat to Barbados and CARICOM that Swine Flu?

    Then why rid Barbados of Swine Flu and not the DLP?

    There are those who would rather a small dose of Swine Flu than five years of the DLP.

    Ask those thousands who have lost their jobs or teachers, nurses and policemen who did not get those duty free cars or increase pay.

    “Everbody” in Barbados is enduring economic pain as a result of the DLP’ dangerous mismanagement but only five have had Swine Flu.


  19. Wishing In Vain // June 24, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    Camper trust me it was no Clico millions it was the average persons in the street

    +++++++++++++++

    “Lawrence Duprey’s CL Financial Group provided scarcely imaginable largesse to the ruling People’s National Movement (PNM) party in the last general election at a time when it was already on the ropes-short on cash and highly leveraged.

    The by-then cash-poor conglomerate bankrolled the 2007 election campaign of the Patrick Manning-led PNM party to the tune of some TT$20 million, according to sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    And while much of CL’s money went through a somewhat circuitous route to sundry suppliers of goods and services: from the printing of fliers and tee shirts to tent and maxi-taxi rentals, the bulk of it was applied to direct billings from advertising agencies for media activity, said sources.

    Some of it however, was paid directly into the party’s coffers. One such payment was made directly to the People’s National Movement from the group’s insurance subsidiary, Clico, on June 28, 2007, for the generous sum of TT$5 million.

    The TT$5 million cheque, drawn from a Republic Bank-held account at Independence Square in Port of Spain, was endorsed less than a month before the November 5, 2007, vote by Rose Janierre, assistant party secretary and Linus Rogers, PNM elections officer.

    The TT$5 million Clico payout to the PNM’s war chest was made at a time when the country’s No1 insurance company had already been red-flagged with solvency issues, a statutory fund deficit of close to a billion dollars and what financial observers warned were dangerously excessive levels of inter-party transactions within the group.”

    http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/news/local/06/22/clico-tt20m-pnm-gift/

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    How much did the DLP get? Is this why Clico has not been placed under Judicial Management as the Insurance Act provides?

    What has happened to Freedom of Information and Integrity?

    Why not a forensic audit on Clico Barbados?

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    What are the facts? Here is the result of the 2008 election:

    BLP = 69,720 (46.9%

    DLP = 78,698 (53%)

    Difference or the impact of Clico millions = a mere 8,978 votes.

    Technical differenc = a mere 1,610 votes


  20. YB. I would not say that the opposition is opposing for opposing sake. The only striking objection were the Clico issue and partially, the Immigration debate. The biggest area of opposing which the opposition failed to deal with is the “HELP” housing issue with its massive spending.

    During any recession, especially this period where foreclosure is eminent. Any Government will be stupid to build hundreds of houses and preaching that John Public will be able to buy one of them, knowing that people are loosing jobs and the others are fearing their jobs. Notwithstanding that the salaries being made by these so-called potential homeowners are in no way within the peripheral to obtain a mortgage. So here we are see lots of houses being built and questionably, sold to who?

    David, Scout, WIV et al; please enlightened the BU family regarding the following:-

    How many lower to middle income people purchased those homes?

    How many of the 63,000 being mooted, purchased other homes, unable to get a mortgage, died, not interested in a home that would give a better updated figure of potential home ownership?

    How many foreigners purchased those homes?

    How many third party wealthy investors purchased those homes?

    We can distinctly remember, the CEO of the NHC stated that the corporation realised over 30 percent of potential owners could not meet the mortgage requirement. What say you?

    My feelings are; the NHC should have concentrated on building terrace units for rental to assist those disadvantage people in having a roof over their heads. Not beating ‘ones chest’ about how many homes being built and not a bajan poor can buy.

    This is one that should have been debated.

    I’m off to work in order to pay my mortgage.


  21. Thompson: Stop the Pork Barrel Politics
    I hear that the Barbados Labour Party is extremely concerned that people who have been working for years, for free as Camp Directors – have been discarded and taken off the list, in order to accommodate DLP members who will now be paid.

    As I understand it, in one instance – even a person, who received glowing praise from a Department of Government for good work as a Camp Director, has been taken off the list.

    Based on such vandalism, the Barbados Labour Party is right to be fearful that Members of Parliament on the DLP side – have been directed to cherry-pick persons to operate as Camp Directors.

    I remember that at an after Cabinet Meeting on January 30, 2008 – Prime Minister assured Barbadians that as his new Government moved to carry out its manifesto promises, there would not be any victimisation or “any night of long knives”.

    People – to whom values and decency mean something – accept that the DLP must not play politics with people’s reputation.

    One minute a reputable Community Based Organization like the Israel Lovell Foundation is selected, then de-selected then re-reselected and now de-selected.

    I too accept that such bad behaviour on the part of the DLP – is totally acceptable.

    Given the casual way in which persons who have served with distinction as Camp Directors for free, for many years – have been discarded to make way for paid DLP operatives – re-enforces my belief that the Camp programme, which was a good idea – has been vulgarised by the DLP and has now been D’ valued into nothing more than “a pork barrel situation,” where the s0-called “squeaky clean” DLP – is of using State resources for partisan purposes.

    What has become of the DLP’s promised of “transparency” and “good governance?” “This is taxpayers’ money! I mean, it is really an appalling scenario that is being presented to the people of this country.

    During the 2009 Budget, Prime Minister Thompson spoke about: “A Team Barbados Approach.”

    However, what is now being presented to the people of this country is a glaring example of: “the DLP fatted calf doctrine.”

    How can it be fair, or just – for the DLP to de-select people who have given of their time for years but now find themselves being replaced them with DLP operatives, who will be paid with taxpayer’s money?

    But it gets much worst! I have every reason to believe that the spending associated with this – “DLP vulgarised camp Programme” – borders on corruption.

    Barbadians must not loose their sense of outrage.

    This is precisely the type of pork barrel politics the BLP cautioned Barbadians will happen, when the DLP pork barrel Constituency Councils, get going.

    This is such a grave situation, which goes against the grain of “good governance,” and every thing that is decent and acceptable, that there should be an urgent forensic audit into the mis-spending and “squandamania” of taxpayer’s money on this DLP “outreach” Camp Programme.

    Also, in light of statements from persons that they have not been paid, will the DLP, which promised: “freedom of information” – say whether the Parliament of Barbados will be called upon to approve funds to pay those persons, as well as DLP operatives, who are now being engaged to execute – what has deteriorated into: “a DLP “slush fund” Camp Programme?

    Why have people not been paid for camps held earlier? Where has the money gone?

    This is a clear example that the DLP has taken the Youth Development Programme and “downgraded” it into a “slush fund” to facilitate its: “pork barrel, fatted calf doctrine.”

    If this Camp Programme was a fair system, I am sure that the BLP would support it.

    But the manner in which it is being administered shows that it is being executed from George Street, as: “an outreach programme of the DLP.”

    It is shameful that people who were not prepared to work for free are now being hand-picked because millions of taxpayer’s money is involved.

    Persons who worked for many years as Camp Directors for free were so organized, that they formed an organization in 2007.

    The BU Family should call on the DLP to immediately stop using this Camp Programme as a slush fund.

    I feel that having promise “good governance” the Prime Minister has a responsibility to all Barbadians to make sure that this happens and that our tax dollars are hereafter spent in a prudent manner.

    ++++++++++++++++

    What Team Barbados Approach? Stop the Pork!!!!!

  22. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    WORD HAS REACHED Cou Cou that a dual complaint has been dropped.

    He beat her; she beat him. He complained; she did likewise.

    But before the sordid details hit the fan, both have been advised that there is no need to add further bruising to the ones they endured. It could especially hurt his political aspirations.

    They no longer share the same roof and expectations are that after the formalities are completed, the two others waiting in the shadows can come into the light.

    Even Flying Fish and Cou Cou is aware of the Kerrie Simmonds and the beating that he gave his wife, reports also reaching me state that part of the cause of the unrest is that Kerrie has being responsible for getting his secretary pregnant and this is a major reason for the break down with his marriage coupled with the fact that he has this stain against his name with his collection and holding of the money to obtain a work permit and a sworn document form a Dr Boolani confirming this to be the case, is a haunting factor.

  23. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    I also heard bites were inflicted seems to be a BLP leadership thing to indulge in acts like this????????????

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading