Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

“The lost decade since the financial crisis is living up to that old adage that when you get economists in a room, you’ll get eleven opinions. The old guard is unable to explain to people just what on Earth is going on”Grace Blakeley

A pulse check of the level of debate concerning all matters affecting Barbadians in this space and elsewhere has fallen short of the mark, IF, we are to be regarded as an educated people. Of concern is the gimmickry we accept from our political and civil leaders instead of reasoned perspectives and efficient implementation of projects. Some say this is where education has failed us.

Many of us align to views based on political allegiance, school tie, built up neighbourhoods and the like. In recent days this blogmaster has retreated from the incessant stream of nonsense which abounds to read. On the bed stand is the book Stolen (How to Save the World from Financialisation) by Grace Blakeley. Although Blakeley’s focus is on the United Kingdom and USA her observations are relevant to Barbados given we are an island buffeting in the exhaust of global turbulence.

The relevance of what financialization to the Barbados space defined in the book as the

…increasing role of financial motives, financial markets, financial actors and financial institutions in the operation of the domestic and international economies. In other words, financialzation means more and bigger financial institutions – from banks, to hedge funds, to pension funds – wielding a much greater influence over other economic actors – from consumers, to businesses, to the state (blogmaster’s emphasis)…

should be of interest given the approach being undertaken by government to stabilize the economy. It seems we have wired our success to a financial model sector as a means to fuel growth. A good example is the ease we accept asset growth in the financial sector which translates to household and commercial debt and – wait for it – a widening current account deficit.

The blogmaster posits that a variant of financialization has exposed  itself in Barbados by the wholesale sell out of local companies fuelled by the expectation of shareholders to maintain profit margins. The government cannot dictate or influence credit or pricing policy given the close 100% ownership of the financial sector. Local players cannot influence the price of food because the major supermarkets and wholesalers are foreign owned. Even the entertainment space is controlled by foreign agents.

The author makes the point that households traditionally worried about wages and wage bargaining, these days they worry about debt. Businesses historically focussed on producing a quality product or service in a market space there had a competitive edge or advantage, these days it is about monitoring share price, dividend scheme,s borrowing and watching key performance metrics. For both individual and business it has become fashionable to borrow more than earn. Therein lies the problem – a conspicuous consumption model fuelled by greed.

To the blogmaster’s simple way of thinking we have a financial system that prey on the establishment by extracting interest earned from burgeoning debt. In such a model only the owner of capital will benefit from the riches.

The thesis position of the book is that we are living through the tail end of finance-led growth and that every capitalist model must end in crisis. It is up to Barbados to position itself to be able to rise like the proverbial phoenix from the ashes.

In recent years successive governments have borrowed and borrowed to respond to the lifestyle needs of consumers.

And so here we are.

 


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

153 responses to “Trapped by Financialzation”


  1. De ole man was not going comment on this matter of dog poop for 2 reasons.

    The first reason was that, like Mr. HAL AUSTIN I was going ask you, “which book you claiming that you reading?”

    Secondly, you have a poor understanding of materials that you claim go have read.

    Additionally you like to setup fallacies for your incorrectness

    In all of the fallacies you wrote, I chose one to comment on because its central to your theme about merchants.

    You said and I quote

    “…Local players cannot influence the price of food because the major supermarkets and wholesalers are foreign owned…”

    That is concentrated hog shit!!

    Vancourt Rouse and Bertram Hall have been AND CONTINUE TO BE INFLUENCING THE PRICE OF FOOD and they are not foreign owned as you have erroneously stated.

    If the main tenet of your argument is wrong THEN NOTHING ELSE CAN BE RIGHT!!

    YOU ARE MISLEADING YOUR READERS LIKE MARIPOSA seeks to do with hers


  2. What the hell is an economist anyway, it is the most mystery and fraudulent job description to date, Barbados is literally littered with economists and not one of them knew what to do about the declining economy. And despite knowing of the many on the island, foreign consultants had to be hired to the tune of millions of tax dollars to achieve the same results, an ailing economy and years to recover. So obviously government ministers don’t recognize economists as useful either.

    Economist as a career choice should indeed be eliminated.


  3. “For both individual and business it has become fashionable to borrow more than earn. Therein lies the problem – a conspicuous consumption model fuelled by greed.”

    And this is what brought the island to its knees..hand in hand with the WHOLESALE THEFT of PUBLIC FUNDS…by all involved..


  4. Good morning Piece where and when and how have i mislead anyone with my comments
    David for what it is worth the article speaks to truth i endorse every word
    This country was built on debt and Greed having the crumbs fall from the masters table to feed the many
    Yes foreign influence has taken a foot hold on this economy
    Govt is left in a position to tow the line or else
    Reason why present govt was so keen to reward these outside influential barons with tax cuts and waivers with an unsigned promised of urgency that these economic gift (given )would serve a purpose of helping to stimulate the economy while holding hands with govt to create a promising job market
    Almost a year later and what do we have are people backs being pressed against the wall
    These financial barons after getting first servings doing nothing to create jobs and govt continuing to serve koolaid behind smoked mirrors to the people
    When will all these shenanigans end only God knows
    Back to u Hal


  5. @ Piece
    You are right on target.
    @ David
    At least you have admitted that “successive” governments have borrowed the country into economic oblivion. Of course successive governments here could only mean the Duopoly.
    And BTW what is this author saying that Pacha has not been writing on BU for years ?
    Slowly but surely the cool aid drinkers are accepting the reality that the Duopoly’s only economic policy is to borrow, borrow.
    And we now here that prices can’t come down because the supermarkets are foreign owned. Stupid me , I actually thought it was the NSRL.
    Hollywood is being seriously challenged.

    The Duopoly Rules


  6. The author opines that “the old paradigm can offer only more of the same, and ongoing austerity and weak growth will only exacerbate the UK’s political and economic problems”.

    This followed her critique of the outcome of the Brexit vote and a finance sector that is flatlining, rising debt, asset price inflation, rise in inequality, living standards and an anger that pervades…

    Reads familiar?

    We need our educated class to provide some sharp critiques on how Barbados must adapt to an emerging global space. The neo-liberal construct appears to have exhausted its shelve-live.


  7. @William

    The article is not meant to deal with any duopoly. It is a bigger challenge we face – not Barbados – the region. Because Pacha has been writing about it it does not mean others should not or be cited.

    Popular is one retailer in Barbados. It does not import all that it sells neither does it command the majority of market share. Will leave this there for those who want to trivialize the essence of the post.. At the root of food prices is we import almost all of what we eat.

  8. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David Bu

    Like Piece .the Legend I was tempted to let this no ball alone. I will not hit it for six either. I think you want to get some free economic advice from this economist “for your friend”. He has been getting free advice but he is “hard ears”. He will have to stew in his “nastiness” as Tom Adams was wont to say.

    By the way,who the &$#@ is Grace Blakeley? Does she know what economists mean by Financialisation ? More importantly ,” What do you ,David, mean by Financialisation? Can you conceive of an economy without Financialisation? Please define what you mean. And tell the BU Household what it is you really want an opinion on.


  9. Yes we do import
    But where not the tax breaks and other financial goodies like waivers meant to offset any hardships felt to the busineess class which in return would have lower prices at the supermarket


  10. @Vincent

    The author is not knocking financialization, she is opining-as her right- the growth of it and negative impact on societies. Unlike many here this blogmaster is open to other views to provoke discussion, especially when we are discussing matters rooted on assumptions and forecasting. Bush Tea would be more harsh in his critique.


  11. @ David
    You and others need to spend a bit more time on the region and less on your former collective colonial masters’ problems.
    For about three months now , there has been a shift and once more the underutilized potential of vibrant intra regional trade is being seen as our greatest hope to combat the problems that have plagued the region for the entire post independence period.
    While some will continue to dismiss the idea of a Caribbean Nation they obviously miss the real meaning of economies of scale. We can cloud the argument in all kinds of intellectual mumbo jumbo and pretend there is some great mystery to be solved.
    Fast modern intra regional trade coupled with with increase good production and an increase of thirty per cent in exports , would eliminate at least seventy per cent of the economic problems we face.


  12. We need a new paradigm of life, David. What exactly is the “Good Life” supposed to be. One in which we are surrounded by consumer goods? Have the latest gadgets?

    Right now I think our “possessions” own us, not the other way around. Do these things make life easier, I wonder.

    I remember when one could clean one’s whole house through and through by midday and spend the afternoon visiting nearby relatives. Now one barely has time to catch up with them once in a while BY TELEPHONE. Houses too big, too much furniture, ornaments and gadgets and something always needs fixing.


  13. that should be increased “food “ production. Not good.


  14. @Vincent

    This post is hitting close to home, this we know.

    Exercising your usual judgement how do you forecast the decision by the Saudis to cut oil production yesterday will impact small island states like Barbados in the coming months?

    We can only hope and pray the authorities have forward purchased for the next 3 months. Then again we have a storage problem that limits the advantage forward purchasing in any significant way will save us. How do we win Vincent?


  15. @ Vincent,

    Grace Blakeley is a British economics commentator and a research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research. She was appointed economics commentator at The New Statesman in January 2019. She is a democratic socialist, a supporter of the Labour Party and sits on the party’s National Policy Forum. Wikipedia

    Born: June 26, 1993 (age 26 years)

    Education: St Peter’s College, Oxford, Sixth Form College, Farnborough, Lord Wandsworth College, St Antony’s College

    Books: Stolen: How to Save the World from Financialisation


  16. @ William

    Plse read: The author opines that “the old paradigm can offer only more of the same, and ongoing austerity and weak growth will only exacerbate the UK’s political and economic problems”.(Quote)

    Can you see the confusion? When contributors attack the nonsense of BERT (austerity) they have been condemned. Yet we are celebrating an author that says the same thing, only about the UK economy.
    When I said that Prof Alleyne was not bringing anything new to the debate I was condemned (I would not mention the names of those who did), yet here is an author saying with approval that the old paradigm cannot provide the solutions. When I condemn the childish way in which the local media go to the same people for comments on the same issues and expect to get new, fresh answers I am attacked by the usual key board warriors.
    Glad to see there is a new voice implicitly saying BERT won’t work..


  17. @William

    You have no idea what the blogmaster does or is privy to. Chances are this blogmaster is more is aware about things regional than you looking on across the pond.


  18. Who is CELEBRATING the author? The blogmaster is sharing a perspective for BU readers to opine as they see fit. Your retreat to obfuscation and hyperbole is getting old.


  19. @ David,

    Saudis did not cut oil production. Their biggest refinery was blown up.

    Drone attacks claimed by Yemen’s Houthi rebels struck two key oil installations inside Saudi Arabia on Saturday, damaging facilities that process the vast majority of the country’s crude output and raising the risk of a disruption in world oil supplies.

  20. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Mariposa

    @ David BU

    Small countries, and large countries as well,cannot produce everything necessary for the welfare of its citizens. Therefore they have to trade. It is a sine qua non. Countries cannot barter. It is uneconomic / inefficient /ineffective to do so. Money and its derivatives simply facilitates trade. The Financial System provides an intermediation function over space and over time. It is necessary for economic welfare and economic growth. So we can like it or lump it.

    It would be more useful to try to understand it and work with it rather than looking for some Holy Grail. Debt is like a Sou Sou / Meeting Turn. If you cannot understand a Sou Sou you will not understand finance.


  21. @Vincet

    Do not give us the trade 101 spiel. The issue here is that Barbados has never initiated a plan to address food security. We import almost all of our food. The issue being raised here is not the need to trade but …


  22. You can find a video on You Tube wunna self. lol

    “Drones hit 2 Saudi Aramco oil facilities, causes fires”

  23. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Hants at 9 :27 AM

    Thanks very much. Please note the colour of her political petticoat.There is a built in bias which may colour the objectivity of her economic analysis.

    @ David BU

    Nice try. I can assure you that my objectivity is not compromised. The scientific approach allows one to keep an open mind and to recognise that knowledge and theories have short shelf lives.

  24. SirFuzzy (Former Sheep) Avatar
    SirFuzzy (Former Sheep)

    @ David,

    This may be off-topic, but the BUers should give a read to Pat Hoyos column in the SundaySun. My question added to his list is “what is their plan for the Credit Union movement”

    Just asking for a friend?


  25. @Vincent

    The colour of her petticoat is known unlike many here and in traditional media.

    What is known is her perspective on the issues is open to review and critique. We all have a biase, even you?


  26. @ David

    You are absolutely brilliant. You can look “ across the pond “ and pontificate on Britain, Africa , USA and the Middle East. However a Barbadian citizen who comments on his country is told he is not as informed as you because his views are from across the pond. You are absolutely correct Boss. You rule tings, Sir.
    @ Hal
    Just let them climb. You know the old saying about what is exposed .

  27. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    You do need the economics “101 spiel”. If you do not take that as a given you will always be tilting at windmills. Barbados as far as I can recall always tried to be efficient producers of the food it can produce efficiently. Economics saves one from trying the impossible.
    You have a blind spot for reality.Time to remove the blinkers. Self sufficiency is another mantra that makes no sense.
    @ Hants

    . The disruption of oil supplies and the consequent temporary price rises are facts of life which we have to live with. We survived past disruptions and we will survive future disruptions unless we give up our Barbadian resilience.

  28. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ William Skinner

    I noticed you visited my calypso tent during CropOver. Let the Monkeys climb.


  29. @vincent

    A man of your ilk must be aware that addressing food security does not mean being self sufficient?

    Pursuing efficient food production where are we with hydroponics, aquaponics and other technology driven means a la Singapore to cite one example?

    The same line of argument can be made to address efficient water generation. It is about leadership and execution Vincent.


  30. @William

    No need to get your sliders in a bunch. You are the one to make the assumption about what the blogmaster knows. He responded with a dose of your medicine.


  31. @Vincent

    There are risk mitigation steps we can take i.e. weaning the country more aggressively from fossil based energy. Do not subscribe to your resigned approach. Never will.

  32. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    It is your blog but you have strayed from the issue of Financialisation and how it has negatively impacted Barbados. Will you please explain how this has come about and what alternatives you have in your bag of solutions other than BERT.


  33. @Vincent

    All the blogmaster has done is to respond to issues raised by you and others.

    The government took a position to enter an IMF program and as part of the arrangement a program (BERT) was crafted to convince/co-opt agreement from the IMF Board to be introduced in phases. Why did we have to go IMF? We have demonstrated an inability to manage our own affairs with discipline. See the several Auditor General report. We can debate all we want, to repeat – we have demonstrated an inability to efficiently manage our affairs. This is what the IMF brings along with the other tired prescriptions.

    Barbados’ new government has announced a three-phase five-year package of austerity and stimulus measures aimed at avoiding a devaluation of the Barbados Dollar. The measures follow a rapid post-election visit by an IMF team to establish the levels of support and actions necessary to address the dire economic state of island’s economy.

    Introducing the emergency package of measures, the Prime Minister, Mia Mottley, told Parliament that the new measures contained in a far-reaching ‘Barbados Economic Recovery and Transformation Plan’ will be introduced in three phases.

    Phase 1 will focus on a review of tax revenue, the imposition of new domestic and international user fees, the removal of three statutory corporations from the Consolidated Fund, greater tax compliance, and a broadening of the tax base on overseas visitors. The objective will be to reduce the fiscal deficit in the first year of the plan.

    Phase 2, starting later this year, will focus on expenditure reduction on Central Government and State-owned enterprises; review the framework within which the country’s International business sector will operate; and deliver a programme of measures intended to stimulate growth.

    Phase 3 will determine what expenditure is essential, what is highly desirable and what is optional. This in part will involve a national dialogue to determine how Government meets future social needs.

    The full extent of the wide-ranging changes to taxation and the way in which government will in future fund its domestic activities and what is proposed for VAT, income tax, corporation tax, VAT on goods and services ordered online, and offshore companies, can be read in the full in budget presentation. This can be found at https://www.caribbean-council.org/barbados-budget-presentation/


  34. @SirFuzzy

    Just read the column, it is riddled with gaps. A pity Hoyos couldn’t avail his contacts to stuff those gaps. He is close to the sector and must be aware of what is happening.


  35. Oh dear oh dear as the young people say ” wunna don’t get tie up.”

    We have an inefficient economy led by an inefficient governance system which has resulted in over taxation on the backs of bajans. We are asked by our leaders to carry this inefficiency as they are either unable or unwilling to do what they are paid for and address it.

    So as a small rock we must ask ourselves if we had an efficient economy led by a streamlined and productive civil service how much would the cost of living to the average Bajan drop by?

    We have no control over external forces so ” peoples” let us focus on what we can control and recognise how blasted inefficient we are and fix it!

    Stick to the basics here folks that we can control.

    For the record Hal and Vincent, we all said BERT had no plan in it for economic growth and hence would not help our island out of the pit as it is currently structured. Nearly 2 years in and after 4 quarters of negative or no growth hence a recession, what are we doing to change BERT?

    Yet another example of inefficiency at its best.


  36. @John A

    Yes and no.

    We have to execute efficiently.

    We have to manage our affairs efficiently.

    However, to ignore the global space and what it portends for us is a mistake.


  37. @John A

    Who owns the capital in Barbados?

    This is where transformational change must come IF government lays and polices the framework.


  38. @ David.

    You looking too deep. First remove the rocks locally and see what we can do for ourselves. They are many small independent economies that are doing well based on efficiency.

    Our biggest problem is we have very little that functions as it should, hence we are all paying the price both as an economy and as a people. The old system of governance has passed its expiry date.


  39. @John A

    Not disagreeing we have to fix our problems on the home front, however we have to do so with an eye what is happening afar. Bear in mind we have to adapt in a global system.


  40. Let us look locally at just one example to show my view, the transport board.

    We have an inefficient entity known as the transport board. It loses pissing money yearly. How did we address it? Well first we increased bus fares. So we put more money in the hands of an entity that couldn’t manage what they were getting before. We then refilled their overdraft as they maxed it out, but what have we changed at the entity? Not one RH!

    So in the meantime bajans carry the burden of higher cost, those that we have empowered fail to do their job and not only Is inefficiency left to grow, but we have rewarded it.

    Now we then proceed to use the same approach across the entire government sector and we then wonder why it costs so much to live in Barbados. I wonder to be honest how come it doesn’t cost more.

    Our problems are therefore 80 percent internal and 20 percent global.


  41. “The lost decade since the financial crisis is living up to that old adage that when you get economists in a room, you’ll get eleven opinions.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    Is there a difference between financial and economic?

    Is it possible to have a non-financial enterprise which makes economic sense?


  42. We must radically reduce the size of the state apparatus, in particular privatise or liquidate state enterprises. We must remove many prohibitions and regulations, such as social norms or norms for the protection of workers.

    Otherwise, the island will never emerge from recession. The only problem is that the government’s hands are tied. Surveys conducted among the conservative population have shown that everything should remain the traditional way of the plantation. The masses see no reason for a real change towards a modern civil society. Almost all folks want to become civil servants so that they can sleep there without worries.

    This diagnosis means two things: firstly, that it is not the government but the people who are responsible for zero growth. Secondly, that we should suspend democratic elections until a government of experts under Mia Mottley’s leadership has generated sustainable economic growth again.

    A society like Barbados, where everyone can do what they want without sanctions, is not necessarily a prosperous society. Sometimes an enlightened dictatorship is needed that serves the common good. I would like to draw your special attention to China: The government there is very tough on the people, monitoring is excellent and growth rates are correspondingly high. Compare where China and Barbados stood twenty years ago. China was a poverty-stricken country, now it is Barbados.


  43. @ Tron

    It boils down to the fact that we want change as long as nothing changes.


  44. @John A

    Brings Owen Arthur’s statement into play – we want to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.


  45. @John A, September 15, 2019 12:46 PM

    That’s the way it is.

    I’ll upload a trial here from time to time. Of course a bit exaggerated and coloured. The reaction is always the same. The members of the establishment on BU then scream that the plans are anti-social, they had always lived like that, their parents had not died of it either, my suggestions were like slavery etc.

    We even have a BU commentator who seriously claims that farming is inappropriate for Barbadians because it reminds them of the old plantations.


  46. “I would like to draw your special attention to China: The government there is very tough on the people, monitoring is excellent and growth rates are correspondingly high.”

    and they also put a well placed BULLET to the heads of each and every government minister, politician, lawyer and business people….for CORRUPTION and THEFT OF PUBLIC FUNDS..something each and every bajan not a yardfowl would welcome.


  47. The problem is the mentality of the population, they want a worry-free, effortless life without self-responsibility.

    One example: When 1000 state employees are dismissed, the trade unions and the socialist activists scream a lot, but when the economy dies because of the high gasoline prices and expats are driven out by the horrendously high land tax, this is not worth reporting.

    I would even like to exonerate Chris Sinckler a bit. He also knew that the population tolerates tax increases much more easily than social cuts. What should the poor man have done differently in the face of a population dependent on social benefits like the crack brothers on dope?

    Instead of always criticising the government, we needed an honest discussion about the social causes of the unprecedented decline of the island. Politicians represent only the people and their bad habits.

    But now back to my Sunday chopsticks.


  48. David

    Thanks for highlighting this central issue, still little understood.

    Also sorry. For this writer in currently in the motherland and can therefore offer little assistance


  49. @Pacha

    Understood, get on with it.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading