← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Slyvan Greenidge, Press Secretary to former Prime Minister Owen Arthur

BLPOn January 18, 2008 Barbadians elected the Democratic Labour Party to manage the affairs of this great Nation. The DLP’s victory in that election could not be deemed a watershed by the stretch of anyone’s imagination. Indeed when one closely examines the number of extremely close margins of victory for quite a number of the DLP candidates, one can hardly call their victory a vote of confidence.

It is against that background that the DLP would want to pull back from the kind of arrogance and roundhead behaviour for which it has publicly been displaying since coming to office. The number of verbal attacks by Ministers on individuals and groups within the private and public sector has helped little in enhancing their ability to improve on their votes in the next general election, constitutionally due within a short three and a half years.

The fear of public servants to speak out on matters that effect them as they did under the previous BLP administration and the general lack of interest by the private sector to offer constructive criticism on critical matters effecting the country is evident that this Government has been left on its own to manage this country in the very difficult economic times. If the saying that “no man is an island” is true and I believe that it is, then this country stands on the threshold of the greatest socioeconomic and political challenge it will face since the 1930s.

The DLP won the 2008 election on the promise to change what existed then for what was expected to come. Their support was based on a number promises made verbally at public meetings in addition to what was inscribed in their manifesto. Barbadians, as was their right, opted for the two birds in the bush rather than the one in hand. Today when one listens to the call-in programs and the comments around the street the refrain is the same – what has changed?

Clearly Barbadians are not impressed with what has been delivered by the DLP thus far or put another way Barbadians are yet to see the change as was promised. Yet everyday vocal DLP supporters who now share in the fatted calf are incensing the ears of Barbadians about their great achievements. They now frolic in the fact that the people have given them power to rule and rule they will, even if the people who gave them that power are now suffering.

The level of failure of this DLP is pellucid and real and spreads across every sector. At the QEH patients care will plunged further into the mire as the last batch of the almost 40 Nigerian nurses take their leave. Their verbal abuse and mistreatment at the hands of this Government has forced their departure and yet to date no effort made to replace them.

The sensitive position for which the QEH now finds itself can ill afford to loss 40 nurses without having a serious impact on its ability to deliver efficient nursing care. Over 5,300 persons and the numbers are climbing have lost their jobs since Thompson became Prime Minister. Every revenue earner for government is now in decline and our foreign reserves are in serious decline. Ratings agencies now point to two dominant factors that have kept this economy afloat. Those two factors are the strong position of the NIS funds and the $2.6 billion in foreign reserves. Both of these fine examples of good governance are the products of the former BLP Government.

Tourism arrivals are down and investor confidence in our country has fled. Every sector now bears the mark of the DLP’s inefficiency and mismanagement. The attempt to convey the message that Barbados’ economic downturn is due mainly to the global recession is misguided.

The global recession has been brought on by a collapse of the banking system in the USA and some European countries. In Barbados the banking system is fully intact and has not been affected by the kinds of problem associated elsewhere. Although we accept that the financial crisis being experienced globally may have some effect on Barbados it is untrue place our problems squarely on the global crisis. The global crisis has not affected Australia and the question is why. One thing is certain, not every country must be affected by global financial problems.

Self Inflicted Crisis

In an attempt to respond to the external shock brought on by the failure of the private sector in the global market the Thompson administration executed a number public sector initiatives that has induced our own crisis and inflicted unwanted and unnecessary hardship on Barbadians.

The misjudgement on the part of the DLP that government was in a financial bind and needed fiscal stimulus lead to their inflationary budget of 2008. That budget, rather than providing financial relief to the private sector, which stood to be affected the worse as a result of the global crisis, extracted over $110,000.000.00 from individuals and companies alike. Government moved to boost its own revenue although it was not prudent thing to do at the time. To compound the problem the government borrowed heavily on the domestic market – crowding out the private sector from much needed investment capital.

This double whammy on the private sector has led to a contraction in the sector with the possibility that the cash flow problem that most of them now experience will deepen hampering their chances of rebuilding quickly following the end of the global recession.

None of the problems being experienced in Barbados to date has appeared on the DLP’s political radar. The only thing that consumes their attention is the fact that the electorate of Barbados has voted them to power. Every effort is being ceased to use that power to carry out their political vendetta. So for the moment the DLP has taken that one moment in time in January 2008 for eternity. One day soon they will learn that you should never take a moment in time for eternity.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. @ Veritas

    I had asked WIV to answer, and you did, I therefore wonder if you are one in the same. That however is irrelevant.

    The fact still remains that supporters of the current government, including yourself, seem unable to answer their opponents’ questions. You resorted to answering by asking–an old trick that no longer will work.

    Your nemeses, based on Annonymous’ response, are not denying that the issues you raise exist. They contention is that the situation is being managed poorly, and that is the thesis of their argument not the non-existence of a global recession etc. You need to prove their position wrong.

    For instance, let us know how and why the NIS policy will work, a task even the government has had a hard time communicating.

    In the Budget Debate, this policy was broken down to simple arithmetic and deemed ineffective by the Opposition.

    Sadly not one single member on the government side (including Estwick) was able to refute that claim. As a matter of fact, the PM rose on a point of order while Dale Marshall was speaking, and further confused the issue.

  2. Sir Bentwood Dick Avatar
    Sir Bentwood Dick

    Rastaman, too true. Yet, some would single those who look ‘different’ as threatening to the country.

    When, the morons who run behind political skirts exhibit such imbecilic behaviour and are a real threat to our nation.


  3. Both B &D cut from the same cloth..both parties got ministers that are Millionaires while staying rich of of taxpayers backs,i ain’t forgetting that Thompson promise to lock up BLP thieves and up to this day not a boy in jail..if wunna feel that i am going to let these Lodge members that probably belong to the same fraternities keep me foolish and poor while arguing about who is best to govern and all that other shite wunna lie!!!!


  4. One bit of advice that we have for Prime Minister Thompson is if his government does not visibly hold someone accountable in the former government of malfeasance BU will be very liberal in highlighting it.

  5. mash up & buy back Avatar
    mash up & buy back

    Mash Up support you on that David.


  6. I am with you too David. At the end of his first term I will not be so lenient.

    @Living in Barbados:
    I actually read all your comments in this thread and found them to be very informative. Have you adopted a new writing style, or is it the cyclical nature of my ability to understand? ha ha ha ha


  7. Any comments on the Governor of Central Bank reaction to Barbados paper being downgraded to BBB?

  8. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @adrian
    I’m not aware of any major change in my writing style, though I try to keep things technical at an understandable level, and not get diverted by ranting and ‘noise’. If you understand better then perhaps I am succeeding. Thanks for the comments 🙂

  9. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    The Governor’s remarks are broadly as one would expect, and not off the mark in terms of what the downgrade means in technical terms. There is a wider investment community, so the impact of the downgrade can only be assessed as and when Barbados next goes to the international markets. BBB is still regarded as investment grade (though at the bottom of that category), and the WSJ report was overstepping by referring to ‘junk’, which is from BB down.


  10. I’d prefer eternity, instead!! 🙂


  11. Thanks LIB and we have agreement. We are a little concerned that the local media ran with junk status label pushed out by the WSJ. Maybe we should not be surprise at this outcome.

  12. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    I’m surprised at your surprise: common written press practice here is to just take press copy and do no analysis or thinking or checking or…much of added value.


  13. livinginbarbados // June 11, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    @David
    I’m surprised at your surprise: common written press practice here is to just take press copy and do no analysis or thinking or checking or…much of added value.

    ****************

    Sounds Barbadian to me!!


  14. For instance, let us know how and why the NIS policy will work, a task even the government has had a hard time communicating.
    ___________

    I don’t waste time with debating the unknown just for the sake of debating.

    Who knows, in this financial environment, what will work? The PM said he wanted to protect jobs and that initiative was creative and definitely focussed in that area.

    Other governments have just folded their arms and waited. I know of no other country in the world that has adopted such a policy. I give the Dems high marks for creativity.

    Secondly, the article by Royaljackass is clearly devoid of intellectual value. There is no point to answer.

  15. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Veritas
    “The PM said he wanted to protect jobs and that initiative was creative and definitely focussed in that area.

    Other governments have just folded their arms and waited. I know of no other country in the world that has adopted such a policy.”

    I suggest that you take a read of some international press reports. The International Labour Organization, amongst other agencies, is working with governments to design policies to help protect jobs and people during the recession.


  16. Just one thing I need the GOB’s reassurance upon.

    Has the NIS sufficient reserves to carry us through this recession, or has the whole fund been already lent to GOB as part of its often quoted internal borrowing.

    Just asking.

    Don’t expect any answer.


  17. ‘Who knows, in this financial environment, what will work? The PM said he wanted to protect jobs and that initiative was creative and definitely focussed in that area.’
    ______________________________

    Creativity is useless if it is ineffective.


  18. Creativity is useless if it is ineffective.

    *****************

    Nonsense!! LACK of creativity is useless!! It might well be made effective, at some point!!

    Way wunna does get dis foolishness, from!!


  19. How do we square what the Governor has said compared to opposition leader Mottley on the downgrade?


  20. I will wait for the unemployment figures for the second quarter 2009 before I comment on Thompson’s “job saving” technique. The current unemployment figure is now 12% and climbing.


  21. @ 199

    ‘Nonsense!! LACK of creativity is useless!! It might well be made effective, at some point!!”
    _____________________________

    Myopia breeds such interpretations; yet after all the posturing you still in the end conceded that effectiveness ‘at some point’ is essential.

    Furthermore, creativity is neither a prerequisite for usefulness, nor does it guarantee success.


  22. Enuff, wivout creativity there is NOTHING!! Now please stop talking foolishness!!


  23. The Concorde was creativity but failed.

  24. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Royal idiot, maybe you should ask some of the many that have filed and have received refunds from the $ 15 million hotel and tourism services relief fund.

    We know that there are bars and restaurant owners that have applied and received the assistance of this Gov’t and as a result of the sensible and timely actions of this DLP Gov’t many of those same operations will be staying open throught out the entire Summer because of these measures.

    This relief applies not only to Hotels big and small but to watersports operators, bars, restaurants, night clubs just about anyone associated with Tourism.

    Royal Idiot please realise that your time in office has expired (and you know why you were kicked out of office in disgrace) let the gov’t get its policies and programs working such was the case with this relief fund and let life settle down and eventually even the likes of you will benefit, remember those words of advice given to you by MP Mr Ronald Jones, pay your bills and stay on the straight and narrow path and stay out of the courts.


  25. Enuff, I’m certain Concorde would still be flying but for the meanness of BA!! As far as I’m aware, bids were made to buy it but BA refused to sell. First, there’s creativity and then anything else follows!!


  26. Well Hartley Henry aka WIV, if I could not pay my bills I would simply ask George Payne for help just like the sitting DLP member of Parliament Stephen Lashley did. Barbadians are only to well aware that just before the last election he was about to be place on the bus heading for the Prison at Dodds for stealing clients money.

    If I could not pay my bills I would not be the only one. Only in March this year, the bailiffs serve papers on Kenny Best for monies owed to a Bank in Bridgetown.

    As for “The First Lady of Parliament” Ms Ronald Jones, all I can say is that, “Hell hath no fury like a women scorn”. So before tendering such advice he should check through the DLP’s sitting members of Parliament.


  27. It is becoming increasingly clear from much of the garbage that is being spewed forth from out of the bellies of some commenters under this thread why the DLP and the BLP MUST GO INEVITABLY, OR BE SENT PACKING BY THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY.

    And the commenter who goes by the pseudonym – NEGROMAN – concluded his piece under this thread very brilliantly by saying that both DLP and BLP are from the cloth and that they have outlived their usefulnesss and must be replaced. Those comments are so very true, and are equal to those that our party and so many other Barbadians have been making for some while in this country.

    So, while the broad masses and middle classes of people in Barbados continue to enormously suffer from the effects of the backward and stupid policies of both DLP and BLP Government, esp in these times of severe political economic recession, many of us on here are subject to the inane senselessness of some commenters whose sole and singular purpose is to falsely make some persons in Barbados believe that the serious issues being presently debated in this country largely centre around DLP and BLP politics and therefore that national politics is really all about the DLP and the BLP. What stark madness, indeed!!

    But, believe it, believe it, more and more of the broad masses and middle classes in this country are seeing the light. They are of the knowledge and conviction that no amount of personal recriminating vitriolic ad hominem exchanges from on either the DLP or BLP side to the other side, and from on both of those faltering sides to those who are opposed to the DLP and BLP, will be enough to stop the vast majority of people in this country from seeing the real malevolence of the DLP and BLP – which is to promote the interests of their leaderships, the latter’s friends’ interests, their business interests and their families interests more than the public’s interests – and thus ultimately getting the rid of them once and for all for their massive failures to respect and honour the interests of the broad masses and middle classes. So, down with the damned DLP and BLP!!

    PDC


  28. Less Prose and more Problem Solving.

    Both the BLP and DLP have taken the wrong approach to the development of our nation. Propaganda and public relations have been more important than getting worthwhile things implemented. We must get to position where analysis and implementation are more important than mere formalities, talking and writing. Communications skills are necessary but are not sufficient to lead us to the level of development that we require as a nation.

    Barbados is a very good society, but it is very noticeable that major problems have plagued us for a very long time. At the national level we have known about problems in the healthcare sector, the lack of progress in the agricultural sector, the transportation problem and the list goes on. At the individual level there is a lack of entrepreneurship.

    Why have these problems persisted in spite of the enormous resources that have been expended? The answer lies in our approach to dealing with the problems. Too much emphasis is placed on formalities and little on analysis and problem solving.

    We continue to get a great deal of formality and old ideas wrapped up in good and sometimes not so good prose, delivered as speeches and presentations by ministers of government as part of various ceremonies. Many of the ideas they present have been around for a very long time and add nothing to our understanding of the various problems and how to solve them.
    Speech writing, speech making, note taking, conducting meetings, and public relations have taken over while analysis and problem solving have been given less focus. Many of the older generation are enthralled when speakers can quote from books like the Bible, and use a little Latin or Greek or refer to Shakespeare. Many of the younger ones like to hear the latest catch- words used by the management experts. It is this attitude that has given us many budgets that are touted as being so good but end up with many initiatives not being implemented. The emphasis was more on how things sound than on thinking through the ideas to see if they could be implemented.

    Our love affair with persons who can turn a good phrase, and deliver a good presentation or speech has blinded us to the reality that complex problems call for persons with skills to undertake analyses. It is from persons with training in areas such as mathematics, physics, and chemistry and engineering that we are likely to find answers to our pressing problems .Yes, ideally such persons should also have good communications and public relations skills but we seldom get everything we want in one package

    At the individual level, unless there is a conscious effort to change, our education system will continue to produce graduates who have no liking for the training that will allow them to develop skills for dealing with complex issues. The issue is not to increase the number of university graduates, but to increase the number of university graduates with the capacity solve complex problems and to engage in entrepreneurial pursuits whether it is in cultural industries or in manufacturing, tourism or agriculture.

    Entrepreneurship must mean more than wholesaling and retailing other peoples’ products. At the heart of entrepreneurship must be the development of new products and services. At the very least it must mean developing new ways of doing old things.

    What types of training is more likely to produce the types of persons we need? I think we are going to have to refocus our efforts and encourage more persons to see science and technology and to some degree the literary arts, as the way to go. For science and technology must provide the basis for the development of new products and services, and the literary arts, the basis for our cultural industries.

    The communications and public relation skills are important but we need to have products and services to promote and market.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading