Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Slyvan Greenidge, Press Secretary to former Prime Minister Owen Arthur

BLPOn January 18, 2008 Barbadians elected the Democratic Labour Party to manage the affairs of this great Nation. The DLP’s victory in that election could not be deemed a watershed by the stretch of anyone’s imagination. Indeed when one closely examines the number of extremely close margins of victory for quite a number of the DLP candidates, one can hardly call their victory a vote of confidence.

It is against that background that the DLP would want to pull back from the kind of arrogance and roundhead behaviour for which it has publicly been displaying since coming to office. The number of verbal attacks by Ministers on individuals and groups within the private and public sector has helped little in enhancing their ability to improve on their votes in the next general election, constitutionally due within a short three and a half years.

The fear of public servants to speak out on matters that effect them as they did under the previous BLP administration and the general lack of interest by the private sector to offer constructive criticism on critical matters effecting the country is evident that this Government has been left on its own to manage this country in the very difficult economic times. If the saying that “no man is an island” is true and I believe that it is, then this country stands on the threshold of the greatest socioeconomic and political challenge it will face since the 1930s.

The DLP won the 2008 election on the promise to change what existed then for what was expected to come. Their support was based on a number promises made verbally at public meetings in addition to what was inscribed in their manifesto. Barbadians, as was their right, opted for the two birds in the bush rather than the one in hand. Today when one listens to the call-in programs and the comments around the street the refrain is the same – what has changed?

Clearly Barbadians are not impressed with what has been delivered by the DLP thus far or put another way Barbadians are yet to see the change as was promised. Yet everyday vocal DLP supporters who now share in the fatted calf are incensing the ears of Barbadians about their great achievements. They now frolic in the fact that the people have given them power to rule and rule they will, even if the people who gave them that power are now suffering.

The level of failure of this DLP is pellucid and real and spreads across every sector. At the QEH patients care will plunged further into the mire as the last batch of the almost 40 Nigerian nurses take their leave. Their verbal abuse and mistreatment at the hands of this Government has forced their departure and yet to date no effort made to replace them.

The sensitive position for which the QEH now finds itself can ill afford to loss 40 nurses without having a serious impact on its ability to deliver efficient nursing care. Over 5,300 persons and the numbers are climbing have lost their jobs since Thompson became Prime Minister. Every revenue earner for government is now in decline and our foreign reserves are in serious decline. Ratings agencies now point to two dominant factors that have kept this economy afloat. Those two factors are the strong position of the NIS funds and the $2.6 billion in foreign reserves. Both of these fine examples of good governance are the products of the former BLP Government.

Tourism arrivals are down and investor confidence in our country has fled. Every sector now bears the mark of the DLP’s inefficiency and mismanagement. The attempt to convey the message that Barbados’ economic downturn is due mainly to the global recession is misguided.

The global recession has been brought on by a collapse of the banking system in the USA and some European countries. In Barbados the banking system is fully intact and has not been affected by the kinds of problem associated elsewhere. Although we accept that the financial crisis being experienced globally may have some effect on Barbados it is untrue place our problems squarely on the global crisis. The global crisis has not affected Australia and the question is why. One thing is certain, not every country must be affected by global financial problems.

Self Inflicted Crisis

In an attempt to respond to the external shock brought on by the failure of the private sector in the global market the Thompson administration executed a number public sector initiatives that has induced our own crisis and inflicted unwanted and unnecessary hardship on Barbadians.

The misjudgement on the part of the DLP that government was in a financial bind and needed fiscal stimulus lead to their inflationary budget of 2008. That budget, rather than providing financial relief to the private sector, which stood to be affected the worse as a result of the global crisis, extracted over $110,000.000.00 from individuals and companies alike. Government moved to boost its own revenue although it was not prudent thing to do at the time. To compound the problem the government borrowed heavily on the domestic market – crowding out the private sector from much needed investment capital.

This double whammy on the private sector has led to a contraction in the sector with the possibility that the cash flow problem that most of them now experience will deepen hampering their chances of rebuilding quickly following the end of the global recession.

None of the problems being experienced in Barbados to date has appeared on the DLP’s political radar. The only thing that consumes their attention is the fact that the electorate of Barbados has voted them to power. Every effort is being ceased to use that power to carry out their political vendetta. So for the moment the DLP has taken that one moment in time in January 2008 for eternity. One day soon they will learn that you should never take a moment in time for eternity.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

  1. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    My advice to the Parro is to understand that the people have voted and in so doing they kicked you out of the door because of your arrogance and your corruption and now clearly to see a lack of talent or ability.

    You seem not to have come to grips with your reason for your demise or have you come to grips with the fact that you have no title or position that dictates that your party is the only one that is entitled to run the affairs of this country.

    The sooner you put it in your pipe and smoke it that BARBADIANS ELECTED THE DLP WHILE AT THE SAME TIME EVICTING THE BLP and are happy to have removed you and also forget that feeling of entitlement that is so much a part of yours and Mottley’s belief, she HAS NO ENTITLEMENT she has to earn that position and based on her present performance she has a long way to go gain that status, her moral standing alone discredits her.


  2. I am appalled that a former Prime Minister’s Press Secretary would have such a poor grasp of English. Could anyone see him holding such a position with the late PM Errol Barrow?


  3. The truth is a lot of the current ministers would hardly have been in a cabinet with the late E.W. Barrow.


  4. The fear of public servants to speak out on matters that effect them as they did under the previous BLP administration

    ——————————————–
    That line alone renders this contribution null and void. The average public servant knows of the horrors, victimization and forced silence that we faced under the previous administration. I wish the government well and give them my support as they try to take us through these trying times.

  5. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    critical matters effecting the country

    Every effort is being ceased to use??

    Willie I think this is but two of the gems!!!

    He would not have been around PM Barrow to start with.


  6. It is not because of his poor English that he could not be around the Dipper, but because he is clearly intellectually challenged…..
    …What public servants speak out under what BLP what?!?

    How could the BLP not have learned from the will of Bajans as expressed in January 2008? What arrogance!! …as though they ACTUALLY think that they are masters and the people who vote are fools who should suffer for not having voted for them….

    Bush Tea does not really know how much better the DLP will be at governance, but based on the apparent BLP position on immigration alone, I can honestly say that- even if under the DLP, the bushman finds himself back as poor as he was in the days of the Dipper- I will NEVER vote for any BLP that contains any of the present lot, or that continues with the present attitude.

    Any sensible loosing party would reassess its position, take new guard, and seek to rebuild the trust of the people. What is this tactic of sending forward clear morons in attack mode? Is this intended to destroy the party that has been responsible for 50% of the development of this country?…. if so, it is working.

    Can someone in authority PLEASE shut up these jokers and let some of the wise heads who have been silent in the BLP come forward with a reasoned, logical position…. PLEASE!!!???

  7. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Bush Tea, with the exodus away from Mottley as is being seen, the question is do they have anything of substance left behind??

    It is most amazing that this group of vile crooks still feed off the notion that Barbadians made an error and that they are eagerly awaitng the blp to regain control, based purely on their own performance and dishonesty while given the opportunity to lead, that the electorate will have a very difficult time to find faith or to be able to trust any of what is left come any future election to vote for them.

    They need a major overhaul starting with the head whom ever that actually maybe.


  8. Come on fellows all I have read so far are the personal attacks. Who will deal with the issues raised in Mr. Greenidge’s post?

    The DLP cannot curse their way through their first term in office. Barbadians are growing tied of those kinds of political detractions as shown in the results of the poll conducted recently.

    Mr. Greenidge is perfectly right; the election of 2008 was won on a promise to change the circumstances of Barbadians. Today we are worse off than under the BLP administration.

    It is one thing to run around shouting about your victory but when Barbadians don’t see the benefits promised from that victory then the ballot will speak again.

  9. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Greenidge AKA Royalidiot, AKA Royal mumble, it is exactly for this same reason you and your lot were evicted you totally underestimating the brains of the electorate as you are doing here on this site once again you idiot.

    Once again you are engaging with a conversation with yourself , come on you idiot you are the only person that does not know that Greenidge and Royalmumble are one and the same.

    Your problem is that you can very clearly see that you and your failed group of crooks have no respect or regard among sensible law abiding citizens and now have to resort to conversations with yourself, what a poor fool you are, Lord forbid that you ever get close to writing press releases for stray dogs ever again.

    Lord save us from that sadness.

  10. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    And the IDIOT has the Balls to address himself as Mr. Greenidge, you are simply unreal and sick in the head as well.


  11. @WIV

    Please note that redundancy, incomplete/incoherent ‘sentences’ and the lack of punctuation are also signs of inept english language skills.


  12. WTF !


  13. When “reality” is spun on its head and its feet does the talking.

    Quote:” The DLP’s victory in that election could not be deemed a watershed by the stretch of anyone’s imagination. Indeed when one clearly examines the number of extremely close margins of victory for quite a number of DLP candidates, one can hardly call their victory a vote of confidence.”

    Dare I say the obvious: ” a vote of confidence” was not for the DLP to have they were the opposition Party. The vote of confidence would have been for the Government to achieve, which they did not do.

    What were the previous – 21, May 2003 General Election results – Barbados Labour Party (Government) 23; DLP 7.

    This glaring exposure of the obvious would have me labeled a DLP supporter.

    My dear friend it is no such thing, it is just the obvious unadorned laid bare.


  14. The question to Greenidge must me what is the relevance in pushing this line? Most Barbadians understand from following the global news that these are hard times for all governments. To push the argument that the DLP is responsible for all bad in the economy is not resonating at all.

    It is accepted that a strong opposition translates to a strong democracy, that we accept. The question fo the BU family, how can the BLP be an effective opposition in these times?

  15. Sir Bentwood Dick Avatar
    Sir Bentwood Dick

    Wuh loss, Yardbroom clap the ball through the covers, for four!


  16. This is a joke right?

    Welllll…. it aint funny

    Sylvan behave yourself!


  17. Mr. Greenidge, how are Barbadians being served at this time by you and your Party’s attempts to undermine the efforts of the present Government? What is needed now is for everyone to pull together to see the country through these difficult times.

    I am not suggesting that there is no place for criticism where necessary, but your ranting and posturing do nothing to help the situation. What would a BLP administration have done differently?

    You give Australia as an example of a country which the “global crisis has not affected” to bolster your argument that “not every country must be affected by global financial problems.” You also state that the banking system in Barbados “is fully intact and has not been affected by the kinds of problem associated elsewhere.”

    It is true that Australia appears to be faring better than most other countries, but there are already signs of future decline in the economy. The Canadian banking system, acknowledged to be among the strongest in the world, has not sheltered the country from the impact of global financial difficulties.

    What do you propose for Barbados?

  18. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    The article below puts The Parro’s argument to bed very quickly.

    Govt gets thumbs up for good job

    Barbados is a world leader when it comes to Government’s ability to get the job done.
    That, in essence, was the message sent to the international financial community about Barbados by Moody’s Investor’s Service, one of the leading international credit rating firms on Wall Street.
    In an analysis of Barbados’ economy, Moody’s cited the World Bank’s assessment of the effectiveness of successive governments in Bridgetown to support its decision to give the country a “high” rating on “institutional strength”.
    Not only was Barbados’ “Government effectiveness indicator” rated among the highest in the Caribbean and Latin America, but around the world, including some of the richest countries, according to the Wall Street firm.
    What made Barbados stand out was its “high quality institutions and social development”, Moody’s went on.
    Just as important, was its ranking in the United Nations Human Development Index, which measures such factors as per capita income, gross domestic product, adult literacy and income distribution.
    “Aside from these traditional indicators of institutional strength, in Moody’s view, Barbados-broad-based consensus on economic policies assure continuity,” the Wall Street credit rating agency added.
    “Labour unions and employers regularly consult and cooperate with government in the formulation and conduct of economic policies, including the setting of wages,” the report explained.
    Moody’s suggested that anyone searching for answers to explain Barbados’ political stability and relative prosperity could find them in the country’s history dating back to the 17th century.
    It told the international financial community that Barbados “has the longest tradition of parliamentary practices” in the Caribbean with “local representatives” very much involved in the running of the country through the House of Assembly.
    “This tradition laid the foundation for political stability and the building of national consensus on economic and social policies after Independence in 1966,” it stated.


  19. Dear Mr. Greenidge

    It is citizens like me who you have to convince that the DLP is doing this hatchet job on the economy. You are doing a poor job at it. As David said your position on immigration would not allow me or my friends to vote for the BLP.

    You are being intellectually dishonest when you blame the present government for the current economic crisis.

    For fourteen years your party squandered a lot of money. An example would be the $785 000 paid to a contractor for a road not done. There is no way a civil servant could pay that money without a politician knowing about it.

    The Prime Minister must get to the bottom of this corruption and exposed it. Somebody must be held responsible. Do not wait until the next election to do it; the public may see it as a gimmick.

  20. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Here we have a report from Moody and then we have a report from The Parro In A Suit Greenidge and honestly I must state that one I can give credit to the Moody report while the other is not worth the paper that it is written on.

    Poor fellow the guard was changed but he has not yet realised that change, the BLP are OUT and the DLP are doing a good job of being in, people have freed up and now feel able to speak.

    You just look at the stories Wade Gibbons has been writing for the Nation something that would never have seen the light of day under Owing and the 1000 lbs of Blubber Mottley.

    Free at last we are free of your corruption and control, we are indeed free at last to speak honestly and truthfully.


  21. […] Never Take A Moment In Time For Eternity « Barbados UndergroundIn Barbados the banking system is fully intact and has not been affected by the kinds of problem associated elsewhere. Although we accept that the financial crisis being experienced globally may have some effect on Barbados it is untrue … […]


  22. The number of verbal attacks by Ministers on individuals and groups within the private and public sector has helped little in enhancing their ability to improve on their votes in the next general election, constitutionally due within a short three and a half years.
    ____________

    Owen Arthur cursed and fired the three QEH managers, PM of Grenada, PM of Jamaica, Liz Thompson, George Payne, David Thompson, Irene Sandifiord-Garner, Clyde Mascoll, Henderson “waitress” Bovell, more than a dozen people in Budget debates, Mr. Grenville Phillips junior, Al Barrack … a long, long list of citizens who couldn’t reply.

    Oh, and I forgot that he once reserved his choicest description for Sylvan Greenidge as “a man whose aspirations are so high that he wants to be like Delisle Bradshaw!”

    And he lasted 14 years!

    You might want it to be short Sylvan (just as you did in 1994-1999 when the BLP won and you were a Dem) but the summer will be long and hot!


  23. By the way, read Tony Best today!


  24. the BLP and its yard fowls are like the conservatives in the USA.The party of no.With no plans,just oppose.In the USA Owen would have gone to jail for that money he stole from the party and put in his bank account.let them address that,theh and only then i would listen to that bunch of crooks.


  25. @ WIV

    Now you are struggling with comprehension.

    That Moody’s article is, in essence, a reflection of governance in Barbados through the years, not the performance of the government from January 2008!!

    No wonder the illiterate in our society continue to be fooled by the politicians and their spin doctors.

    Common sense would dictate that given the indicators highlighted, there is little the current government could have done in a year to dramatically change such an opinion of Barbados.

    As a matter of fact, if one READS and COMPREHENDS the article, it is clear that the former government with its 14-year tenure must have done a hell of a job maintaining and or improving the key indicators identified by Moody, and should be complimented.

    I also do recall the same Moody agency being pilloried by government apologists on the blogs for their recent credit ratings report. Why the vacillation?

    You still have not answered the issues being raised by your nemeses over and over again. If they claims/concerns are baseless show us, instead of spouting bile.

    Good debate triumphs over emotive, myopic, ‘yardfowl-esque’ drivel.


  26. I find it amazing how many of the comments on this post equate to “We won the election so the BLP should shut up and go away”

    Criticism from the opposition is not “undermining the government” it is part of democracy in action. In fact the view that the opposition is undermining the government sets a dangerous tone because it says that the supporters of the DLP equate their party with the country. This is a dangerous mindset indeed.

    WIV said….
    “My advice to the Parro is to understand that the people have voted and in so doing they kicked you out of the door because of your arrogance and your corruption and now clearly to see a lack of talent or ability.

    You seem not to have come to grips with your reason for your demise or have you come to grips with the fact that you have no title or position that dictates that your party is the only one that is entitled to run the affairs of this country.”

    This train of though CLEARLY shows that he feels this current government is above criticism and that the opposition has no standing to criticise them.

    It could easily be paraphrased “we run tings now, shut up and go away”

    However Mr. Greenidge as a member of a political party or as a private citizen has a RIGHT (some would even go so far as to say an obligation) to criticise or voice his opinion about the performance of those in office.

    WIV yes the people spoke in January 2008, do not presume that means a license for your party to silence all opposition.

    Neither should you presume that the January ’08 result means anything about future elections. The DLP will have to contest those on it’s own performance, not the failures of the BLP five years or ten years earlier.

    You sir, have to come to grips with the limits of your mandate.


  27. @ Veritas

    The man said: ‘……has helped little in enhancing their ability to improve on their votes….’

    The operative word being enhancing, which suggests that the writer is aware that there are other variables (the state of the economy for example) that play a part in a party’s ability to be re-elected.

    He is therefore not saying that verbal attacks alone will lead to a defeat, but could make victory more difficult.

    Clearly the other factors outweighed the former PM’s knack for cussing based on your lists of names.

    The aspirations quote killed me though…..tres funny.


  28. Anonymous said:

    I find it amazing how many of the comments on this post equate to “We won the election so the BLP should shut up and go away”

    Criticism from the opposition is not “undermining the government” it is part of democracy in action. In fact the view that the opposition is undermining the government sets a dangerous tone because it says that the supporters of the DLP equate their party with the country. This is a dangerous mindset indeed.
    ____________

    I assume that you are referring to my post. If so, I am no DLP supporter but just someone calling for balance, particularly in these challenging times. In fact, I am not presently living in Barbados. Criticism for the sake of criticism does nothing to advance democracy. And those who criticize should be prepared to offer alternative solutions. Otherwise they risk undermining not only the government but society as a whole.


  29. I wasn’t referring to just your post, but I would expect Mr. Greenidge to be about as balanced as WIV was before the election.

    My issue is with persons who apparently would deny Mr. Greenidge the right to say what his opinion is. He is under no obligation to bring an alternative solution while pointing out flaws in the Governments custodianship.

    Criticism of the government can only serve to improve the government’s performance, (once the government cares about the public’s opinion)

    Further, there has been precious little discussion about the issues raised by Mr. Greenidge in his contribution rather an overwhelming dismissal of his concerns as somehow being illegitimate which I find troubling.


  30. The current debate is one which we need to have and it is why we have been encouraging the BLP people to submit their views for discussion. It seems to us that any average debater can present any issue along partisan lines. Where we need to go without reneging on party affinity is to raise the bar where positions on both sides are substantiated most of the time in a dispassionate way. The insularity which follows political debate in Barbados runs counter to the boast that we are products of a good educational system.


  31. David,

    how ironic that you have never made a similar call of WIV


  32. BU is populated with comments from BU household and BU family requesting WIV to tone it down. Many comments from WIV have been edited or deleted. As always we understand that labels will be applied.

    Despite the labels we will continue to call on the BLP side to submit views for discussion.


  33. You still have not answered the issues being raised by your nemeses over and over again. If they claims/concerns are baseless show us, instead of spouting bile.
    ______

    Enuff,

    Put your great intellect to work now. Which of the above by Sylvan Greenidge and his ghost-writer do you agree with?

    Is there a world recession now? Or only a DLP recession?

    Are jobs being lost in the USA? Or only in DLP Barbados?

    Are investments crumbling all over the world – including Dubai – or only in Barbados under David Thompson?

    Is the NIS employment stabilisation scheme – hailed by the private sectors throughout the region – a good thing? Or is it bad because David Thompson thought of it?

    Tell, us, Enuff.


  34. Is there a world recession now? Or only a DLP recession?

    Certainly there is a world recession, this has been plain since 2007 where it could be seen coming by any who cared to look. The question is how has the DLP handled the recession? Removing subsidies on deisel prompting a 70% rise in fuel costs to the manufacturing sector overnight (check Bico’s annual report if you doubt me) having an inflationary budget which extracted 110million dollars in taxes (some of which they still not figured out how to implement) having a budget this year that led Ersnt & Young to conclude “in the absence of significant measures in this year’s budgetary proposal, are those previously presented sufficient to weather the global economic storm?”” People are concerned about the DLP’s handling of the economy.

    Are jobs being lost in the USA? Or only in DLP Barbados?

    Yes jobs are being lost in the US as well, but the Obama administration has set out a clear policy on how it is dealing with the crisis, we still wait for a coherent statement or policy position from the DLP. (See E&Y’s quote above)

    Are investments crumbling all over the world – including Dubai – or only in Barbados under David Thompson?

    Yes investments are falling, however the Barbados property market seems to have retained it’s value in spite of the international market. However anti investor rhetoric coming from the administration certainly hasn’t helped.

    Is the NIS employment stabilisation scheme – hailed by the private sectors throughout the region – a good thing? Or is it bad because David Thompson thought of it?

    Funny EY’s response was….

    While this source of additional loan funding is welcome and job levels would be maintained, one must question if it would be sufficient to meet employers’ cash flow requirements in the long-term, as the current level of employment must be maintained and the duration of the economic recession is unknown.”

    Hardly seems like a blanket endorsement to me.

    The fact that there is an economic recession elsewhere does not relieve the DLP of it’s responsibility for the economic conditions of Barbados.

    The lack of coherent policy positions and contradictory actions by different government agencies are legitimate causes for concern.


  35. Talk about a lover scorned!

    (Can’t believe that the author of this piece was a press secretary to a former PM.)

    The BLP has been the beneficiary of the ‘good times’ economically, whereas this present governnment has taken the reins after the horse has been out of the stable. So count your blessings! To say that Australia has not been affected and then compare Barbados with it, is unreasonable when you take into account that Aussie has a vibrant export industry whereas Barbados’ main income earner is tourism- mainly fr Europe & N.Amerika – those who have been battered by this global fraud. One can turn your analogy of the vote hardly being one of confidence in favour of the DLP, into one of confidence enough, to remove you from the helm by opting for the TWO birds in the bush simply because that ONE in the hand was flying along the COASTLINE in the wrong direction ….away from the centre i.e.the electorate, and hereby giving the TWO that’s fluttering in the bush enough THRUST and LIFT. And should they too fly along the coastline away from the center, then their wings should also be clipped never to fly again.

    FYI… the global recession was not caused by a collapse of the banking systems in the USA & Europe. It was caused by the withdrawal of money both visible and invisible from the circulation by a few gangsters bent on enslaving every last one of us.

    If those in opposition are truly interested in Barbados as a whole and not just having their turn to feed at the public trough, they would stop the nit picking. Its un- becoming of ‘future leadership.’ It does not put you in a good light.

    If you are truly BIG MEN, stop the bitching. That’s for little girls!


  36. Hartley Henry aka Wishing in vain and the rest, you all really want to flog Mr. Greenidge on grammar though it is clear to see that there are just typos? You all are just scraping the barrel truly. I cannot believe that you all listen to the House of Assembly debates on Tuesday and hear the green verbs that fall from the lips of our Minister of Education, the Minister of Tourism and the Deputy Speaker of the House, star boy Kenny Best. You all are not serious so let me move on to the point at issue.

    I am yet to read a single comment that deals with the points raised in the post relating to the damage being done to the economy by the Thompson. Quite frankly the economy is on autopilot with no direction. Mr. Greenidge was perfectly correct when he recommended to the DLP that they should pull back from their arrogance and round-headed behaviour. This foolishness about cursing ordinary Barbadians about their intellectual abilities is an attack on the vision of the Right Excellent Errol Barrow.

    Only recently Freundel Stuart and Chris Sinckler viciously attacked our UWI students and said that they could hardly read or write. This says something about the way provisions for the so-called “free education” was structured. If this new DLP’s constant attack on the intellectual capacity of Barbadians can be justified then clearly their political mantra of liberating Barbadians through free education is in serious doubt.

    Our students intellectual capacity is a reflection of our educational system therefore any intellectual defects that this new DLP now sees in our students must have its genesis in the structure of the system they claimed to have instituted. So much for that.

    Mr. Greenidge dealt with problems in Tourism, Health, the economy and others, but not a word from his critics. The only thing that keeps recurring is the DLP’s hook line “we got power now”. Not a word of explanation or consolation for the more than 5,300 persons now unemployed, the rising number of small businesses closures, the sharp fall in demand for goods and services across every sector and the concomitant fall in profits and taxes resulting in further of job loses.

    It is amazing that Hartley could interpret the Moody’s report in today’s Nation Newspaper to be referring to the current DLP’s administration. Only a fool would believe such. Moody was referring to Barbados’ overall economic management for over more than a decade and not the past thirteen months. Check the language being used Hartley. When it speaks about the country’s political stability and relative prosperity, take note of the words it uses to describe them. It used words like tradition, country’s history, it even speaks of the policies post 1966.

    In this new comprehensive assessment on Barbados, Moody makes reference to our ranking in the United Nations Human Development Index, a point the BLP boasted of when it was in office, but the DLP played in down. Moody now confirms and attributes the high standard of living of our people to our good governance.

    Another achievement the BLP constantly boasted about when it was in office was the level of prosperity amongst our people. Again the DLP played this down and sought to give the impression that corruption was the order of the day in Barbados. Today Moody not only speaks to that high level of prosperity but also to the high quality of our institutions and social development. There is no country in the world that could have sustained 14 years of social and economic development, as evident under the last BLP administration and at the same time indulged in the level of corruption for which the DLP has accused the BLP of. It is simply not possible.

    The region is replete with examples of what happens to counties and companies in which corruption is rampant – Clico being our most recent. The many lies and dirty underhand deeds of Gordon Brown in England to get the rid of Blair have not produced the political goods he anticipated. Today he and his party sit in the political mire as their fortunes disappear before their very eyes. Thompson and the DLP are not far away from their dose of political retribution.

    Barbadians know only to well what the international agencies had to say about our economy in the early 1990s, so there is no need to revisit that. What we should take note of now and what I would invite Hartley to give his opinion on, is Standard & Poor’s outlook for Barbados since the Thompson administration took the range of government.

    On Friday, May 1, 2009 S&P lowered its economic outlook on Barbados from stable to negative, citing growing debt and dismal revenue growth as the reasons for their reassessment. It said GDP would contract by more than 2% vs growth of 0.5% for 2008. It further projects that the deficit will rise to almost 6% of GDP by the end of 2009. This DLP Government’s attitude of simply doing nothing because there is a global recession is absolutely frightening.

    Had the BLP been in office today Barbados would still be enjoying a high standard of living, record levels of employment, growing investor confidence and prospects of continuing prosperity.


  37. Yes Hopi, life would be so much easier if these opposition supporters would just allow the government to be mediocre without having to face critics.

    What you call “nit picking” is democracy at work!

    The opposition WILL NOT shut up and go away!


  38. Anonymous……..Nit-picking is NOT democracy. This nit-picking is the loss of opportunity to bloat at the public’s trough! Hence the whining and restlessness. Removing a party from power because of policies that were contrary to the majority’s wishes is ‘democracy.’

    Seems like it was the BLP who ‘took a moment in time for eternity’ and were caught off guard when routed from their comfort zone.


  39. Criticism of the DLP’s myriad failings is not “whining and restlessness”it’s pointing out where the government has fallen short either by sins of omission or commission.

    The DLP supporters here would do well to realise that trying to shut up critics will eventually backfire on them

    The Opposition WILL NOT shut up and go away.

  40. A Rastaman Just Wondering Avatar
    A Rastaman Just Wondering

    Look wha politics duz mek big men do doah…………………..shame

  41. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    Bravo for encouraging politicos to put forward their party arguments. But, so as not to make smoke and mirrors, if the author can use his name for the post surely he can use it for his posts.


  42. These political debates are important for a flourishing democracy we have in Barbados.However,I find it amazing that we have so-called mature responsible men who aspire and in some cases are leaders in their communities bitching like little children..

    The Democratic Labour Party is the government of Barbados today and that is a fact that cannot be deny.I consider the job the Democratic Labour Party is doing to be reasonable at this time.There are some issues that I have expressed my disappointment with in no uncertain terms.The apathy in bringing into effect a comprehensive immigration policy.That has now been rectified to a certain extent.It has reneged on many of its election promises.That is understandable.It is trying to uplift the social care services in the island by restructuring some of the agencies that offer those services.Social care services such as National Assistance Board,Urban & Rural Development Commissions have undergone restructuring and are in a better position to offer the help to those among us who are in need of such help.The abuse of those services by the previous administration for political benefits are no more.Genuine cases are getting the attention those cases deserve regardless of the person political affiliation.A concerted effort is being made to solve the chronic housing shortage in Barbados.Minister Michael Lashley is one of the hardest working cabinet minister in Barbados today.In general the Democratic Labour Party administration is performing reasonable well up to this point.However,there is a down side.

    This government has not stop the raping of the treasury of Barbados.It paraded at the beginning of its tenure about the wastage of money on unnecessarily consultants.Many consultants in many departments were sent packing and for very good reasons that many Barbadians supported.However,one set of consultants were dismissed and another set took those places.The Mighty Gabby was dismissed as Cultural Ambassador in the Ministry of Culture and a retired public officer quickly replaced him as a consultant in the culture ministry.Many consultancy posts in the Prime Minister’s Office were abolished and similar occurrence happened to that in the Ministry of Culture.That is many poltical lackeys such as Hartley Henry,Cranston Browne & other were offered contract jobs in the Prime minister Office.

    Misappropriation of government funds and in some cases downright stealing were occurring in some government departments under the last administration.Hardwood Housing Inc.was a prime example of misappropriation of tax payers money.The award of the contract for the extension to the ABC Highway was another project that had the hallmark of stealing.We were promised a full investigation into the dishonest deeds on Hardwood Housing Project with the understanding that those responsible will feel the full weight of the law.A year & a half in this administration and nothing has been done on that issue.It seems that is a dead issue.A little resolution was reached in the ABC Highway issue with the firing of some contractors & companies in that project.

    This government has not given us the people of Barbados the hope that some of the lands in this country will be available for us.No new legislation to protect the vital land mass of Barbados.Our lands are still for the highest bidder and those bidders are not the vast majority of us Black Barbadians.No policies are in place to bring about an effective distribution of the resources of this island.There is no provisions in place for powerful big Black business to emerge.Black Barbadians after nearly 60 years of so-called Black rule are still basically landless.

    The Democratic Labour Party nor the Barbados Labour Party are in any position to castigate and criticize each other.Both parties are from the same cloth.Both parties have outlived their usefulness and must be replace.
    .

  43. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Sylvan Greenidge
    The British-style electoral system is first past the post, so it is not worth making a point about how many votes got you past the post. The winner takes the spoils. That said, if you feel a true mandate based on proportional representation is better, then make that proposition.

    The verbs affect and effect confuse many in English, but I would suggest not mixing them up.

    Australia is not a good example to use. It has suffered from the world recession but in very different ways to the US/Europe, not least because it is a commodity-economy and geared very much to Asia, especially China, and that region was less involved in subprime lending/banking sector crises (see IMF report, http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2008/pn08123.htm). But Australia has had to deal with the destabilization caused by wild swings in commodity prices (especially gold and oil, but also coal, bauxite and alumina). It also had a different start point, having run fiscal surpluses for years to reduce its debt, but also having a flexible exchange rate to offset certain economic headwinds.

    The better comparison would have been between Barbados and other Caribbean island economies who were ‘good performers’, like The Bahamas, and then the story is not so hunky dory.

    If Barbados is not greatly affected by the global economic crisis, then I must be sleeping. The effects are mainly indirect through the loss of spending power of its main markets (UK, Canada, USA, Europe). Those effects come mainly through lower tourist arrivals, lower tourism spending, lower foreign interest in real estate transactions. The impact of that which will be direct comes from lower income for Barbados, while national spending needs have not fallen as much as they should (even with the fall in oil prices), and a large part of that is because the country imports too much food from abroad. The drain on reserves is one clear consequence, and the widening fiscal deficit is another.

    The other impact on Barbados is coming from/will continue to come from lower transfers from abroad (call them remittances), especially by those nationals who are directly affected by the recession in the UK and US.

    So, as you said (or really John Donne said), no man is an island, and no island is an island either. But as Donne also wrote in that Mediatation, “And therefore never send to know for whom
    the bell tolls; it tolls for thee,” which I’m sure your DLP counterparts will happily use as a reminder.

  44. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    In terms of how the island is not an island unto itself. The breaking news is that Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services cut Barbados’ credit ratings closer to junk territory, reflecting economic woes and rising debt.

    The reads as follows on the Wall Street Journal (see http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090610-712312.html):

    “The one-step downgrade to BBB comes two months after S&P took a more pessimistic view on Barbados, changing its outlook to negative from stable.

    Tourism is critical to the Caribbean, making up 16% of its overall economic activity, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council. But the global economic downturn has reduced business and leisure travel.

    Credit analyst Olga Kalinina noted in April that growing fiscal deficits and increases in the government debt burden could hurt Barbados’ long-standing commitment to maintain its currency peg.

    S&P said Wednesday it expects Barbados’ economy to contract by 2.5% this year, followed by a flat performance in 2010, before gradually recovering to 2.5% growth in 2011.

    The nation’s fiscal policy is seen resulting in debt rising to 86% of gross domestic product.

    “Interest payments are expected to rise to 12% of revenues this year from 9% in 2007 – the highest level among the rating peers,” S&P said.

    The outlook is stable, meaning further downgrades are unlikely for now, reflecting S&P’s expectation that the Barbadian government will tighten its fiscal accounts from 2010 onward.”


  45. When, in the early ’90’s election that the BLP won, the % between the two parties was not that big, plus that is the norm in most elections. Even when either party only got 2 or3 seats the difference wasn’t anything alarming. It’s funny the little things the BLP are catching at. They raised a fanfare when they won and is now criticising the other party for doing the same. They are spitting up in the air and it is falling back on to their faces.


  46. Living in Barbados your observation of the First Past The Post system is accurate however the percentage of votes cast provides a valuable analytical insight as to how vulnerable the government might be to a swing against it. I believe that this was Mr. Greenidge’s point. Interestingly the difference is never more than about 40/60 split even in our most extreme election results.

    The slimness of the margin in terms of votes suggests that this government may be vulnerable in 2013 if there is a small swing againgst them.

    The S&P downgrade and the accompanying concerns about debt management can be laid squarely at the DLP government, as the debt burden was actually declining in the last few years of the BLP administration. Further the structure of Barbados’ debt has been predominantly denominated in local currency so negating a foreign exchange risk. According to PM Thompson this debt structure profile will change in the coming year as Barbados goes to the Trinidad Capital Markets to raise a multimillion US dollar loan.

    Hence our debt profile and debt level are both increasing under the DLP administration.

    Yes we can talk about the peformance of other islands in the Caribbean, Trinidad fared better than other economies in part due to their oil revenue. This administration bungled the oil bid so catastrophically that it scared off many potential bidders. They now find themselves in a position where the stated policy is that they will “negotiate directly with the oil companies” as opposed to a competitive bid situation. This was an opportunity to add a “third leg” to the Barbados economy besides financial services and tourism that was basically still born. The maladministration is amazing.

    In closing in my response I noted with concern the recent comments by the Governor of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago made in the Newsday newspaper on June 4th that

    “Barbados is trying to raise between US$100 million and US$150 million on this country’s stock markets to avoid going to the IMF.”

    These are not small things……but they are also not things easily translated to the man in the street, so for now we have political theatre with Guyanese illegal immigrants.

    I think we SHOULD ask for whom the bell tolls, it may well be for us.

  47. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Anonymous
    The argument seemed to be about validity of the government’s mandate, based on narrowness of electoral wins. The swing issue is complicated because change in turnout can deal blows (good and bad).

    On debt, I disagree. Public debt (central government and government guaranteed), as reported by the IMF Barbados’ 2008 article IV consultation showed total public debt to GDP rising from 87.1% in 2004 to 94.6% in 2007.

    On debt structure, having a large proportion that is local currency does not remove the debt service burden, just changes how it can be financed. Local debt opens up the route to inflating it away.

    On oil, I’m claiming no expertise, but understood the drillable seams to be far offshore and deep, making them expensive propositions. Whether they were good in an era of US$100/barrel oil but not or less so in a world of US$50-85/barrel I cannot say.

    With due respect to the Governor of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago, he cannot speak for another country. He can of course postulate. The IMF options are still there, if needed.


  48. here is a pitiful tommy tucker singing for his supper. how much is big mamma mia paying you for your services, sylvan? have some pride in yourself and stop being a public nuisance. if thompson were to offer a little pick, you know that you would come running back to the DLP because your commitment is to opportunism. get a life, sylvan.


  49. LivinginBarbados….

    According to the Prime Minister’s budget speech (page 42) Barbdos’ Debt to GDP ratio peaked under the BLP at 79.4% in 2005,

    in 2006 it DROPPED to 78.9%

    in 2007 it DROPPED AGAIN to 77.0%

    in the first year under the DLP it skyrocketed to 84.5% dropping to 82.8% this year and projected to go up again in the coming year as the Thompson government shops for their US loan on the Trinidad capital market.

    As far as your response vis a vis the Central Bank Governor’s observation, clearly it is not an official position, but it is an observation made by a man who has the knowlege and position to understand the situation in the Barbados economy.

  50. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Anoymous (is it so hard to have a handle? :-))

    I specifically cited TOTAL PUBLIC DEBT. The figures cited by Fin. Min. Thompson cover only central government debt, and omit the government guaranteed debt, which soared from B$387 million (about 75 of GDP) in 2004 to B$729 million (12% of GDP) in 2005 and on to B$920 million (13.5% of GDP) in 2007 (see Central Bank of Barbados Economic and Financial Statistics, April 2009, Table G8). That was debt increasing under the previous BLP administration (and that is a statement not a political point). The country is on the hook for the whole lot, and the international financial world knows that.

    Notwithstanding Ewart’s knowledge and position, his remarks are but an ‘observation’.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading