← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Mia MottleyThe BU household was engaged in an animated conversation at the dinner table last night. We will not bother the BU family with all the details, but we felt there was a point made which provoked some passionate responses which we would share.

Many of us have observed that most leaders of countries are preoccupied with managing their public image. A big part of managing that public image is to project a ‘one big happy family’ picture. We have seen the First Family of the United States going one step further by adding a dog to the mix.

The meat of the dinner table discussion centred on how important is it for a leader of a country to have an immediate family which is percieved as ‘one big happy family’.

The BU household was reminded that the former Prime Minister Owen Arthur opted to patch his struggling marriage when he became Prime Minister. His estranged wife at the time was based in New York. When Arthur’s marriage to Beverly collapsed, he may have made the decision to marry his Executive Secretary Julie Price which based on subsequent events he had a long standing relationship before he became officially divorced. The marriage to Julie, the sudden appearance of his twenty one year old daughter, and there was the tragic event which we will courteously not mention, supports the argument that former Prime Minister Arthur was mindful of how important a ‘one big happy family’ approach was to sustaining his successful political career.

His counterpart at the time and current Prime Minister David Thompson has always projected family as being very important. We know that Prime Minister Thompson has for a long time adopted a program dubbed Family First which is established “in his beloved St. John, is a pioneering initiative that aims to re-establish and re-assert the family unit as the paramount and core constituent in the overall development of communities.”

The consensus around the dinner table was a family is important to project an image of security, stability etcetera. The public not only in Barbados but worldwide seems to value these qualities in a leader. Former President Bill Clinton of the United States sullied his family image by engaging in a sexual act in the White House. At the time Hillary Clinton, his wife, obviously had her eye on running for public office because because she willingly endured the embarrassment caused by her philandering husband.

The discussion reached its climax when the prospect of the next election in Barbados was tabled. If all the ‘actors’ remain the same , it will mean that Leader of the Opposition Mia Mottley will have the opportunity to disprove the BU theory. It is public knowledge that Mia is of single status. Can Mia Mottley overcome that expectation which the public has that a leader should posses that ‘one big happy family’ image? It seems that she is trying to partially compensate for not having her own family because she has been seen in public with a dog! We are not sure if former Prime Minister Owen Arthur would be willing to give her a crash course in backyard gardening.

Unfortunately the BU family dinner had to come to an end at this point. No doubt we will get a chance soon to continue to discuss the importance of a family if a political leader wants to reach the pinacle. Can Mia secure the number one job in Barbados with single status?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

57 responses to “Mia Mottley Swimming Against Historical Tide”


  1. I trust that many of you loyal blp supporters are finally awaking to the fact that this same party that you use to worship is being unravelled as the crooks we know them to be.

    Today the house was hushed when the PM revealed that part one of the Forensic Audit is in hand and it clearly suggest that legal proceedings needs to be begun, they have also suggested that it would be correct to begin a part two of this same Forensic Audit to delve deeper into the going ons at this dirty mess HARDWOOD HOUSING that Mascot and arthur were part of.

    It is high time that these scamps are dealt with firmly and from the report of the Forensic Audit it has removed any doubt that fraud existed or that those involved should be sent to the DPP.

    I must praise the new Gov’t under the leadership of the Prime Minister The Hon David Thompson for bringing this matter before the people in the time frame that it has and in as a quick a time as it was done.

    While this investigation is on going we are also hearing of other Forensic Audits being agreed to in other Gov’t Depts, but right around the corner is the correction of the madness that went on at Coastal and Leo Brewster and his companion, I have no sympathy for those that steal and MAKE THE TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THEIR GOOD TIMES.

  2. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    me and me too

    I note that you are very vitriolic in your criticism of WIV

    Could he be telling the truth?

    I personally know how badly I was treated by the BLP. And I am just one person.


  3. The sooner the likes of me and me too comes to grips with the reality that the BLP proved to be a MORALESS, CORRUPT,. DISHONEST bunch of SPINELESS CROOKS the better for them.

    Did you listen to stage one today in Parliament, HARDWOOD HOUSING that arthur tried to shield Mascot and himself from is following him at a rate and it is only a matter of time that the likes of them will face the court system, and then to the VECO prison that HALLAM NICHOLLS, OWING ARTHUR and GLYNE BANNISTER ought to reside in for many years to come.


  4. Sorry, she’s just not my cup of tea! And never will be.


  5. FORMER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) of Hardwood Housing Factory Inc. (HHFI), Anthony Murrell, and others may face legal action over the recovery of company funds, tools and equipment.

    That is the recommendation of forensic auditors who have also suggested Government seek legal advice regarding possible breaches of the customs laws and violation of the Money Laundering Prevention and Control Act.

    A ministerial statement on the preliminary findings of the financial audit was made in the House of Assembly yesterday by Prime Minister David Thompson, who first called for an investigation into the operations of the company when he was Opposition Leader last September.

    The report, dated May 2, 2008, highlighted the following issues:

    * the unlawful removal of equipment and materials from HHFI;

    * rental by HHFI of equipment from a company controlled by the CEO and an employee of Hardwood Housing Factory Inc;

    * the questionable use of HHFI in off-book projects;

    * the purchase of materials using HHFI funds for projects which cannot be identified;

    * the use of HHFI materials and labour on projects where the proceeds have allegedly been paid to a company linked to the CEO; and

    * consistently high salaries and wages with little or no correlation in earned revenue or completed projects.

    Furthermore, the preliminary report recommended that a corporate search be undertaken to determine the link, if any, between two separate companies and HHFI or any of its related parties.

    Against this background, the unnamed private and “reputable accounting firm” that conducted the preliminary audit said that there were “sufficient and serious grounds” to warrant further investigation into the company.

    As such, Thompson said a recent request by the Barbados National Bank seeking a letter of comfort from Government to support an overdraft facility which had been extended to the company prior to January 2008 for $700 000, would not be honoured – at least not until a full investigation was completed.

    “I am most reluctant, Mr Speaker, to give any specific details relating to names, events and supporting documentation upon which the forensic auditor relied on at this point in the interest of justice,” Thompson told the House during the post-luncheon session.

    He however added: “But it is vital that I keep this Honourable House and the people informed of the Government’s efforts to pursue this matter to its legitimate end.”

    He expressed extreme concern about the financial decisions taken by the previous administration as they related to Hardwood Inc. as well as the alleged involvement of senior members of the former Government in the operations of the board of the company.

    According to Thompson, this brought into question the integrity of the previous Government’s financial systems and raised issues of transparency and accountability.

    “I have therefore accepted the advice of the forensic auditors that Phase 2 of the review be undertaken with a view of ensuring that those guilty of any criminality are brought to justice,” he concluded.


  6. Is this the same David Thompson that is yet to answer the questions about his use of private jets owned by corporate citizens with whom the Government does business? The same David Thompson who gambles on slot machines. Gimme a break with the morality argument WIV. You assume that because people are objective that they support the BLP. Remember my friend that the same way we put you in we can throw you out.

    And no I am not saying that the BLP was perfect or that there were no cases of corruption. I applaud any investigation into suspected wrongdoing, particularly if people are called to account for their actions. What I find distasteful is baseless allegations, innuendo and slander. It actually pushes me away from the DLP. But keep it up WIV if you think it works. It does not impress me, but hey what do I know. I just get to vote every five years or so.


  7. Back off with that talk bout slot machines. DLP only came to power yesterday.

    I am not so knowledgeable, however, I know that I was hearing about this slot machine issues eons ago.

    So PPPLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading