Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Parliament recently passed a Bill that makes almost all Barbadians guilty of domestic terrorism and liable to life imprisonment. This could have been avoided by narrowly defining domestic terrorism to catch those who fund, plan and/or commit mass-murderous terror activities.

The Domestic Terrorism Bill includes in its definition of domestic terrorist, someone who: (i) violates any law of Barbados where the penalty is at least 5 years in prison, (ii) does the act in a public place and (iii) is motivated by bias against race, nationality, ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender or religion.

HURDLE 1 – 5 YEARS IN PRISON.

Since 2018, many bills have been passed where the penalties for relatively minor offences are a prison term of 5 years or more. Some scenarios follow.

If you do not give a document about your business to the Beneficial Ownership Unit, which is a new unit that every small, medium and big business must register, you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Beneficial Ownership Transparency and Register Bill, 2026, Section 29.2).

If you remove or cause to remove any tissue from the body of a dead person, you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Human Tissue Transplant Bill, 2026, Section 33.3).

If you: (i) operate a drone without approval (Section 123) or (ii) allow a tied sheep to graze on airport land (Section 131), you are liable to a fine of $50,000 and 5 years in prison. If you use a cell phone on-board an airplane contrary to the notice in the seat’s pamphlet, which few read (Section 134), you are liable to a fine of $250,000 and 7 years in prison (Civil Aviation Bill, 2026).

If you fish in Barbados’ waters without approval, you are liable to a fine of $10 million and 15 years in prison (Section 20). Any visitor to or employee of the Maritime Authority who tells someone without approval what they read, heard or learnt while there, is liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Section 90) (Maritime Areas Bill, 2026).

If you: (i) associate with a gang (Section 5), (ii) pretend to be a gang member to intimidate someone to leave you alone (Section 5) or (iii) conceal gang-related activity (Section 14), you are liable to a prison term of not less than 10 years and not more than 20 years. If you do not tell the police where a gang member (including a relative) lives (Section 12) you are liable to a prison term of not less than 10 years and not more than 25 years (Criminal Gangs Bill, 2026).

If you cause an older person to feel distressed or use threatening words to them (Section 2), you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Older Persons Bill, 2026, Section 10).

If you, without approval: (i) remove sand from the beach (Section 152), (ii) remove coral from the sea (Section 153), (iii) sell coral, (iv) include coral in the manufacture of an item (Section 153), (v) leave garbage on the beach (Section 154) or (vi) enter a restricted area without paying the entrance fee (Section 151), you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 10 years in prison. If you do any research in Barbados’ waters without permission (Section 164), you are liable to a fine of $500,000 and 10 years in prison (Integrated Coastal and Marine Management Bill, 2025).

If you know that a book, song or movie is copyrighted and allow it to be read, performed or watched in public, you are liable to a fine of $200,000 and 5 years in prison. If you watch a copyrighted movie or listen to copyrighted music for free, you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Copyright Bill, 2025, Section 166).

If you intercept another person’s e-mail, text or voice message, you are liable to a fine of $500,000 and 7 years in prison (Interception of Communications Bill, Section 5).

If you: (i) threaten to sell or give away any household item of a person with a disability or (ii) repeatedly insult a person with a disability, you are liable to a fine of $50,000 and 5 years in prison (Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill, 2025, Section 24).

If you: (i) copy data from a computer (Section 6), (ii) turn off a computer (Section 7), (iii) disclose a password (Section 11) or (iv) receive or are given access to any data (Section 13) without permission, you are liable to a fine of $70,000 and 7 years in prison (Cybercrime Bill, 2024, Section 6).

If you use a computer to send information that: (i) intimidates someone (Section 19) or causes someone ridicule or embarrassment (Section 19) or annoys or insults another person (Section 20), you are liable to a fine of $70,000 and 7 years in prison (Cybercrime Bill, 2024).

If you are operating a small boat and it is too loud (Section 213) you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 7 years in prison (Shipping (Domestic Vessels) Bill, 2024).

If you: (i) do any research or collect any data or information from a coastal or fishing community or the surrounding area (Section 42), (ii) inform the public about traditional cultural expressions associated with the sea (Section 48), (iii) export part of a fish or any sea organism (Section 66), (iv) search for any underwater treasure (Section 81) or (v) take minerals from seawater (Section 176) without Government approval, you are liable to a fine of $100,000 and 5 years in prison (Maritime and Underwater Heritage Bill, 2024).

If you do not provide information to a Barbados Water Authority inspector or their consultant, you are liable to a fine of $50,000 and 5 years in prison (Water Reuse Bill, 2023, Section 11).

If you collect and treat water flowing on your property and share it with your neighbour to irrigate their plants, flush their toilets or use in any other non-drinking use without Government approval, you are liable to a fine of $200,000 and 10 years in prison (Water Reuse Bill, 2023, Section 12).

If you harvest a large bag of mangoes from your tree and do not have a delivery note with you when transporting them, you are liable to a fine of $10,000 and 5 years in prison (Protection of Agricultural Products Bill, 2022, Section 4).

Why do we want to lock-up so many Barbadians for 5 years for relatively minor offences? Where is the sober second thinking that the Senate is supposed to exercise rather than carelessly rubber stamping legislation passed in the House of Assembly? However, that is a separate difficult conversation for another day.

HURDLE 2 – PUBLIC PLACE.

Once the 5-year imprisonment threshold has been met, the second step for most Barbadians to be charged as domestic terrorists is that the act must be done in a public place.

The Bill defines a public place as a highway or road and any other place where the public are allowed free or paid access at specific times. This would include any: store, restaurant, church, school, public building, hospital, clinic, stadium, airport, park, cemetery, beach or sea in Barbados.

All of the offences listed above may be done in a public place. However, some may require explanation.

If you remove human tissue at a cemetery, that is a public place. If you tell someone to remove the tissue while you are driving on a public road, that is a public place. If you watch a copyrighted movie or listen to a copyrighted song for free on your phone while in a bus, that is a public place. If you tell a disabled person that you plan to sell the clutter in their house while on the road with them, that is a public place.

If you copied information from a lap-top computer at a restaurant, that is a public place. If you have to cross the road to give your neighbour some treated water to flush their toilets, that is a public place. Roots of fruit trees may extend beyond your boundary into a public place. If you water them, that is a public place.

HURDLE 3 – MOTIVATION.

The final hurdle to be charged as a domestic terrorist is that the act must be motivated by bias against: race, nationality, ethnic origin, sex or sexual orientation, gender or religion. (Domestic Terrorism Bill, 2026, Section 2).

In this digital age, evidence for bias is abundant on people’s social media: friends, posts, comments, likes and shares. Information is multifaceted. Every day, most information posted on social media can be justified, through one facet, as being against someone’s: race, nationality, ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender or religion. We have boxed ourselves in a corner when using social media to evidence bias.

If the person requesting information about your business is a male, female, Christian, Muslim, white, Indian, homosexual etc and you liked an innocent joke that included a disparaging comment about an aspect of the person requesting the information you did not provide, then you just won the mother of all lotteries – that you wished you lost.

If you tie your sheep on Airport land, and the person in charge of airport security is a woman, and you liked a comment on your friend’s social media page, and your friend frequently posts comments disparaging women, then you also win the lottery of losers.

If you sell coral at the beach at inflated prices to white female tourists because you think they will pay more without complaining, and you do not sell to black women, because they may complain loudly and disrupt your business by accusing you of overcharging, then that is a bias against race and gender.

If you listened to copyrighted gangster rap on a public bus, and that rap music disparages women, then that may be evidence of a bias that motivated you to listen to it.

If you preach against homosexuality in a Church and that message, which is certain to annoy homosexuals, is broadcast over the Internet, then that is bias against sexual orientation and the lottery is automatically won.  Prosecutors normally use an accused’s social media activity to evidence an accused person’s bias, motive and intent in the USA, Canada, the UK and Europe.

THE PENALTY.

The liability for winning the lottery of losers is life in prison. To ensure you remain locked away for a very long time, you must first serve out your sentence of breaking the first law with a liability of at least 5 years in prison. Once that sentence is served, the life in prison liability is then added consecutively.

We could have passed a Bill targeting actual terrorists. We did it before in the Civil Aviation Bill, 2026, Section 104, where anyone who endangers the safety of an aircraft or the persons onboard, including taking hostages, is liable to life in prison. So, why set the domestic terrorism threshold at 5 years for any law of Barbados? Why not set it at 25 years?

Our Senators were given the option to raise this ridiculously low threshold that can trap almost everyone as a domestic terrorist. They chose not to take it. They should explain why.

Grenville Phillips II is a Doctor of Engineering and Chartered Arbitrator. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

16 responses to “A Nation of Terrorists”

  1. William H Harriss Avatar
    William H Harriss

    Some of the charges listed are outrageous and perhaps even inhumane and a crime against humanity.


  2. “Our Senators were given the option to raise this ridiculously low threshold that can trap almost everyone as a domestic terrorist. They chose not to take it. They should explain why.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Our senators know, even better than the rest of us, that the whole senate shiite is just a waste of time and resources…
    Everything about our legislature is a joke…
    From the outdated concept
    to the partisan selection processes
    to the “blatant lackie” characteristic that seems a mandatory requirement…

    That last comedy, when parliamentarians all voted to support the no-floor-crossing-bill,
    that essentially neutered themselves – was the last nail in the shiite coffin.
    …along with when the young girl was summarily dismissed for simply being honest – and not another senate boy DARED to raised their voice….

    Steupsss!!
    Having said all that, we ALWAYS get exactly what we deserve as a people – via representation that REFLECTS our general character.
    Thus the USA got Trump…

    No doubt the typical Bajan brass bowl in the street will tell us that these references from Grenville are nowhere as bad as back in the old plantation days…
    …and that perhaps we should thus be thankful…

    Brass bowls adapt easily to being convenient ’topsies’.


  3. Nothing wrong with implementing laws but they should be relevant and be enforced. The relevance should come from rigorous socialization with stakeholders by government and fueling a culture of accountability which makes enforcement routine.


  4. ‘Terrorism’ has special meaning for Government, Executive Branches (Defence, Police, Courts etc) giving them extra-legal powers to circumvent checks and balances in law without burden of proof required.
    The ‘War(s) on Terror’ priorities were to implement sweeping powers to monitor tax paying civilians and the mission creep over the last 25+ years has resulted in terrorism being applied to petty crimes such as political protests groups activism and vandalism which are against Government and Business and illegal wars with a surveillance state in full effect.
    Barbados may be following US diktat but the explicit writing of what terrorism will be applied to is an implicit warning of the latest scam by the New World Order Warmongers.


  5. Surprise, surprise

    Infant now in state custody

    By Maria Bradshaw mariabradshaw@nationnews.com

    A 28-year-old Nigerian woman has become the first person charged with child trafficking in Barbados after authorities intercepted an alleged smuggling operation involving a newborn baby girl.

    Hope Chioma Patrick, appeared before Magistrate Keitha Ellis at the District “D” Magistrates’ Court yesterday. She was not allowed to plead to charges that on June 1 she trafficked in children and wilfully gave an untrue answer to an Immigration Officer. Patrick was remanded to Dodds Prison and is scheduled to return to court on September 24.

    The infant at the centre of the case has been taken into state protective custody. Authorities suspect the child was destined to be sold on the black market in the United Kingdom (UK).

    According to Saturday Sun investigations, Patrick arrived in Barbados on June 1 aboard an Air Peace flight from Nigeria, carrying the newborn. She told immigration officers she was in transit to the UK. She was questioned and subsequently cleared to enter the country.

    However, days later, Patrick went to the Registration Department at the Supreme Court Complex and attempted to register the infant as a Barbadian citizen. When she failed to produce documentation proving the child was born on the island, a registration officer contacted the Immigration Department and she was subsequently taken into police custody.

    Patrick was also unable to prove she was the child’s mother and the baby was seized.

    The woman was in police custody for the past two months, awaiting the results of DNA testing. Those tests confirmed she was not the biological mother of the infant.

    The investigation took a new turn when a second Nigerian woman recently contacted Government offices inquiring about Patrick and the baby, stating she was the child’s mother. Authorities said any woman wishing to claim the infant must travel to Barbados and submit to DNA testing.

    Sources said Barbados has now contacted UK officials and Interpol regarding the case. In response, immigration officers have been placed on high alert and ordered to strictly scrutinise women travelling with babies.

    This case highlights the illegal network known as the “Nigerian baby racket” or “baby factories”. These are unauthorised facilities operating across Nigeria where traffickers target vulnerable, unmarried, or financially desperate young women. In these operations, infants are conceived and birthed to be sold on the black market. Women involved are either coerced by poverty into selling their babies, or abducted and forced into sexual slavery to produce children for the trade.

    When contacted yesterday morning, hours before Patrick’s court appearance, Minister of Home Affairs Gregory Nicholls told the Saturday Sun: “I can confirm that there is a matter under investigation. The Immigration Department has reported the matter and it is under investigation.”

    Nicholls said: “The laying of charges in this matter represents the robust efforts of our Immigration Department who proffered the information for the charges and the relentless efforts of the Barbados Police Service in securing the prosecution of the alleged child trafficker. This demonstrates that our border security system works and that Barbados will not relax in our efforts to maintain the integrity of our borders or in our efforts to dampen the scourge of international human trafficking. The matter is now before the courts and I am confident that the thorough investigation of this particular matter sends a strong signal that Barbados’ border security is strong and efficient.”

    Nicholls said Government just recently took the Advanced Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record Bill to Parliament which was passed in both Houses to further secure this country’s borders and enhance its immigration enforcement capabilities.

    He added: “The new Immigration Bill which will come up in Parliament next month will also provide the basis to broaden the measures designed to counteract the effects of the evolving landscape of international criminal activity and give our immigration officers further scope to enforce our laws and protect our borders.”

    Source: Nation


  6. Take a break.


  7. GOOD MORNING, DR PHILLIPS!!! YOU’VE LEVELLED US WITH ANOTHER ASSIGNMENT THAT WILL HAVE LASTING CONSEQUENCES FOR EVERY BAJAN CITIZEN ON THAT LIL ROCK. THIS IS A DRAGNET – NOT A TARGETED DEVICE FOR GANGSTAZ, GANGBANGERS & SOCIAL VERMIN – BUT LIKE A FISHING NET, INTENDS TO DRAG IN THE GOOD, BAD & UGLY REGARDLESS OF THE REPURCUSSIONS! BAJANS MUST REVOLT AGAINST THIS POWER GRAB OF AUTHORITARIAN PROPORTIONS THAT WILL CEMENT FASCISM* ON WHAT WAS ONCE A PARADISE ISLAND

    Heaven help OUR* people…

    Let us begin without the preamble

    This is a characteristically forensic and alarming piece.

    My dear brother, always perform a crucial public service role by meticulously dissecting pieces of legislation.

    This “Domestic Terrorism Bill”, exposes what he sees as a profound and dangerous overreach of state power (when in my estimation, the real “TERRORISTS” are those through whom their truncheoned use of “pseudo-FALSEHOODS” of “LAWFARE) is being used to silence “DISSENT” – believing they wield power – when nothing could be further from the truth.

    Dr. Phillips’ core argument is that the Bill’s definition of “Domestic Terrorism” is so broad that it could be applied to almost any Barbadian, turning routine, minor infractions into potential life sentences.

    THAT IS TYRANNY – NOT RIGHTEOUS JUDGMENT OR JUST LAWS

    This must be “FLAGGED” in the international media space!

    He systematically breaks down the three “hurdles” that, in his analysis, make this possible.

    As an “social engineer” also, Dr Phillips will appreciate that the mechanics of a “Nation of Terrorists” is an egregious marketisation of a people that number just about 270,000.

    Let us examine his argument

    He argues that the Bill creates a 3-step path to being labelled a terrorist

    (a) Hurdle 1

    A 5-year prison sentence.

    The Bill’s definition of a terrorist act includes violating “ANY” Barbados law where the penalty is at least 5 years in prison.

    As Dr. Phillips meticulously documents, a staggering number of recent bills have set precisely this threshold for offences that many would consider minor – from not registering a business, to allowing sheep to graze on airport land, to sharing treated water with a neighbor.

    CAN THE MOTTLEY CREW JUSTIFY THIS MADNESS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE COLD WAR ERA OF COMMUNIST DOCTRINES ARISING FROM CHINA, CAMBODIA, CUBA, LAOS, NORTH KOREA, VIETNAM TO RUSSIA

    (b) Hurdle 2

    A “Public Place” is where the act must occur and/or “public place.”

    The Bill defines this broadly to include almost anywhere the public has access, even temporarily, such as stores, buses, beaches, and the sea.

    THIS IS STUFF FROM THE MYTHICAL LAND OF LILLIPUTIAN

    (c) Hurdle 3

    A bias motivation is the citation.

    Finally, the act must be motivated by “BIAS” against “RACE”, “NATIONALITY”, “SEX”, “SEXUAL ORIENTATION”, “GENDER”, or “RELIEGION” (correct spelling).

    As Dr Phillips points out, in the age of social media, evidence of such bias is “abundant” and open to wide interpretation.

    His conclusion is devastatingly simple!

    Any citizen who commits a relatively minor offence in a public place and has a social media footprint that can be construed as biased could, in theory, be charged with domestic terrorism and face life imprisonment.

    HORSE MANURE! IT STINKS AND ITS SMELL IS WAFTING

    He contrasts this with the Civil Aviation Bill, which specifically targets acts that endanger aircraft – a clear, narrow definition of actual terrorism.

    DR PHILLIPS, GOOD LUCK TO THE FOLKS WITHAL THAT PIG EFFLUENT

    Let me explain the “COMMON LAW” regarding “BIAS”!

    The common law of bias is currently facing significant criticism regarding its ability to hold serious traction, primarily because it relies on heavily context-sensitive principles that make outcomes difficult to predict and generalize.

    Law-lords in Britain critically argue that the current framework, which often requires the impugned judge or their collegiate panel to decide on their own recusal, given the defective and ill-equipped nature to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.

    Here are the “KEY” challenges to the robustness of common law bias rules which include –

    (1) Unpredictability, as the law is described as a “corner of the law” where particular circumstances are of supreme importance, leading to inevitable differences in judicial assessment and making it hazardous to form general rules.

    (2) The structural “Flaws” in collegiate courts suggest that in multi-judge panels, allowing the biased judge or the remaining panel to decide on recusal is seen as problematic – for scholars suggest this issue requires legislative intervention (and that in of itself is a landmine issue), rather than incremental common law development.

    (3) Public Perception v. Actual Unfairness also suggest that there is an ongoing debate between the “Orthodox View” that bias law protects public perception and the view that it should focus on actual unfairness, with some arguing that relying on public perception creates uncertainty and distorts the judicial role.

    (4) Finally, the “High Burden 4 Proof” contends that while actual bias is rarely found due to the difficulty of proving a person’s or a judge’s state of mind, the test for apparent bias (whether a fair-minded observer would perceive a real danger of bias) remains strict, placing a heavy burden on litigants to rebut the presumption of judicial impartiality.

    From the learned UK legal perspective, given a profound reading of the facts before us, ultimately, while the rule remains a fundamental principle of natural justice, its fragmented, case-by-case development in “adversarial proceedings” is increasingly viewed as insufficient to address modern complexities in judicial and administrative decision-making.

    HERE ARE THE NUTS & BOLTS

    The rule against “BIAS” is not an “OFFENSE” (criminal or civil), and actuality, it cannot be “LEGISLATED” anywhere or in any place (AS IT WILL BE STRUCK DOWN), and the “FOOLS” who are pushing this – hopes to get away with “MURDER”!

    “BIAS” CANNOT* be brought against an individual!

    It is a procedural principle governing “DECISION-MAKERS”, and the consequence of a breach is that the affected decision is quashed or set aside, not that the person is prosecuted or sued.

    HOW THIS MADNESS AFFECTS EVERYDAY BAJAN CITIZENS

    As a beneficiary, if a public body, tribunal, council, or regulatory authority makes a decision that affects your rights (e.g., a planning application, benefits claim, or employment tribunal), you can apply for judicial review on grounds that the decision-maker was “biased” or “appeared to be biased”.

    I HAVE JUST LODGED ONE SUCH CASE IN THE LAST FEW DAYZ

    The decision would be quashed – not the person punished!

    As a “JUROR”, (of which I am), you can be challenged for actual or apparent bias under the (Juries Act 1974), but the consequence is simply that you are excused from service – not charged with anything!

    In a quasi-judicial private role, if you act as an arbitrator, adjudicator, or member of a private tribunal – the bias rule “CAN” apply to you!

    Again, the consequence is that your decision is voidable – not that you face a charge!

    The short answer without being long-winded is simply that “BIAS” in the “STRICT” legal sense is a “DEFECT” in the process – not a “FAULT” in the person!

    It “protects citizens” by ensuring decisions affecting them are made impartially – it doesn’t create a new category of “WRONGDOING” that can be prosecuted.

    LET’S HOPE THE IMBECILES IN BARBADOS IS READING THIS & THEY ARE FREE TO ARGUE THIS BEFORE ANY LEGAL TRIBUNAL IN & OUT OF BRITAIN (#FullStop)

    Finally, thus far, while the Bill is the direct subject, Dr Phillips article is also a broader critique of Barbados’ governance model – which at best is a “HODGE-PODGE” of legalistic narcissism, and at worst, an “OLYMPIC TRIATHLON IN VAUNTED TYRANNY”!

    The abject failure of the Senate, is called out by Dr. Phillips who explicitly opined that their failure to exercise “sober second thinking” and instead “carelessly rubber stamping” spurious legislation is a damnable exercise in communistic tyranny – in a supposed democracy that “PREACHES” on the world stage by a “JOKER” for a Prime Minister!

    He demands they explain why they didn’t raise the threshold from 5 to 25 years to limit the Bill’s reach.

    A pattern of overreach suggest that the Bill is presented as part of a concerning trend.

    It sits alongside the rapid passage of the Immigration Bill and the Beneficial Ownership Transparency and Register Bill, which together create a picture of a government systematically expanding its power without commensurate oversight.

    THIS IS NOT JUST TRUMPIAN POlieTICS IN SPIRIT ONLY – BUT IN THE LETTER AND METHODOLOGY OF THE LAW

    #Queen Elizabeth was “REMOVED” – so Barbados could have another kind of “DISNEYESQUE GAME OF THRONES QUEEN” as sovereign – a possible “BLOODY MARY” who would rule with a “SWORD” made of WHYTE” sand!!!

    On that cold, cold war note

    Semper Fidelis

  8. Terence Blackett Avatar

    DR PHILLIPS, TO YOUR DEEPER TARGET OF THE SENATE OF BARBADOS AND THE GOVERNACE MODEL IN 2026, IS A CHARADE & A LAUGHING STOCK OF TRUMPIAN APOLOGETICS WHERE THE HORSES & RIDERS GALLOP ALONG @ A PACE SET BY THE WICKED WITCH OF ENDOR LEAVING NO WIGGLE ROOM FOR ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN THE MASSIVE STORM THAT IS COMING

    #PoLIEtics in Barbados is like a Saturday meet @ Garrison Savannah!!!

    Only you alone know what “MADNESS” will occur on the day in question!!!

    The craziness Dr Phillips outlines is the most pungent & necessary “ALARM” for “Civil Liberties” in a generation or more!!!

    AGAIN, let us begin

    Dr. Phillips’ essay is a powerful and necessary intervention for several reasons…

    (1) HE* does his homework (like all great 1st Class Honours students)!

    He has taken the time to read multiple pieces of legislation and connect the dots, creating a comprehensive list of offences that could now be interpreted as stepping stones to a terrorism charge.

    This is a vital act of public scholarship and I commend him for it!

    (2) It exposes systemic weakness by highlighting the rubber-stamping role of the Senate, for he points to a fundamental failure in the system of checks and balances.

    The lack of “sober second thinking” he describes is a governance crisis!

    IS HE THE “ONLY” ONE SEEING THIS

    (3) It sounds an serious “ALARM” on the issue of “CIVIL LIBERTIES”!

    The Bill, as he interprets it, poses a direct threat to the principle of proportionality in law and given that “THE LAW” is a “JACKASS” in my country and elsewhere – no wonder, the church bells are tolling.

    When a minor regulatory breach can theoretically lead to a life sentence – the law ceases to be just and becomes an instrument of potential tyranny and oppression.

    The “Nation of Terrorists” Dr. Phillips describes is not one actively harboring “VIOLENT EXTREMISTS”, but one where the legal definition of terrorism has been stretched so “THIN” that it could, in theory and/or in principle, be classified as “CHINESE NOODLE ENTRAPMENT”, where almost any citizen can be hauled in by the dragnet!

    GUESS I AM BIAS* AGAINST OR FOR THE CHINESE – TAKE YOUR PICK

    His article is a stark warning about legislative overreach and the erosion of civil liberties in Barbados.

    This piece reinforces the consistent thread in his work – detailing like a “good mechanic” (NO FREEMASON ANOTATIONS IMPLIED), a forensic, systems-level diagnosis of governance failures.

    By meticulously connecting the dots between scattered pieces of legislation, he exposes a systemic vulnerability that might otherwise go unnoticed.

    He is challenging not just a specific bill, but the health of Barbados’ entire legislative and oversight process.

    With a GOV* and judicial system that is so dysfunctional @ best of times, and “CORRUPT” lawyers out of control, @ WORST OF TIMES – (SWINDLING INNOCENT BAJANS WITH STRATOSPHERIC FEES LIKE $750 FOR JUST TURNING UP – NOT HAVING TO SAY A SINGLE WORD IN COURT); notwithstanding, the “LEGAL BROTHERHOOD OF FREEMASONIC CHARLATANS” who “ROB BLIND” the people because they somehow believe they are worth it, (WHEN IN ACTUALITY THEY ARE BUNCH OF WHORES & SLAPPERS), hardly “WUKKING-UP” for their pay!

    MAYBE THE LAWLORDS IN BRITAIN ET AL CAN CHARGE ME FOR BIAS HATE SPEECH OR STRETCH THE PACK OF NODDLES TO INCLUDE “DEFAMATION” TO SEE IF THEY CAN MAKE SENSE (#cents) OUT OF NONSENSE

    Notwithstanding “JUDGES” & “MAGISTRATES”, of the decrepit (#MagnusOpus), taking “MONTHS” (if not, “YEARS”) to rule on simple cases, with (KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW AS OFTEN CITED BY THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE #CCJ) – [Yearwood v Yearwood], but choosing recalcitrance and posturing rather than appropriate justice – they behave as a law unto themselves!

    This is “LAWFARE”, which is the first pillar of “Legal & #PoLIEetical Tyranny”!

    Dr Phillips’ frustration cuts to the very heart of what the Blogmaster et al have been documenting for years.

    The “Lawfare” describes, the weaponisation and dysfunction of the legal system in Barbados!

    This is not a conspiracy theory but a lived reality for many, supported by a growing body of public evidence from fair judges, hard-working lawyers, and balanced academics.

    The judiciary is not operating as an independent check – IT IS, in many ways, paralyzed and complicit in its own inefficiency!

    These “SUPPOSEDLY” learned, legal “MINDZ” are the “ONES” who run the “MOTTLEY CREW GOV*” and are responsible for the “MESS” they are making – given somewhere down the road, someone will have to come with truckloads of toilet paper & fire hoses to clean the abominable “MESS” they “DUMPED” upon the nation!

    On that scurrilous note

    IMDUN

    #ForTheMoment


  9. THE ENTIRE WORLD WAS SCREWED OVER BY NEANDERTHAL PALESKIN SLAVERS, DEVILISH EUROPEAN COLONIZERS & CATHOLIC RELIEGIOUS SATANISTS – LIKE HUMPTY-DUMPTY BROKEN 2 PIECES & WILL NEVER BE PUT TOGTHER AGAIN

    What we are witnessing is the “STUDENT” doing exactly as the “NASTY STINKING MASTER” before him did!!!

    Black so-called “LEADERS” are the effusive “STINKING ODOUR” left like a miasmic cloud hanging over us after 400+ years of “PILING UP A DEATH-DEFYING MOUNTAIN OF HUMAN FILTH”!!!

    Show me someone who could “FIX” this “MOUNT STINKEROO”??? #ButGod

    MOTTLEY-CREW & THAT INSIDIOUS GROUP OF HOUSE NIGGAZ CAN SAY WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT – AINT NUTTIN’ CHANGIN’

    I am not the “ONLY ONE” who believe that!!!

    WORLD WAR THREE WILL REMOVE 3.3 BILLION FROM EARTH – “maybe” THEN, THERE WILL BE “parity” & A SEMBLANCE OF TRUTH & RIGHTEOUSNESS WHEN THESE GOVs ARE NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE AS THE WORLD REVERTS BACK TO THE WORLD OF THOMAS HOBBES

    When my next installment is ready, I will continue my exegesis on this diabolical model called postmodern democracy & the “WICKED” conditions of the “PLAYERS” who believe they can “CONTROL” human existence without “SCRIPTURAL” love & “MORAL” honesty!!!

    IT’S ALL DOOM 2 FAILURE – SPECTACULARLY


  10. Hi Terence:

    While Bias may be challenged in court, it may take a charged persons a decade to get there while they are remanded for a decade on such a serious charge of Domestic Terrorism. Bail may not be given for such an offence.

    If the aim is to remove persons from the public space in Barbados for 10 years, then the end may be achieved without a conviction.


  11. DR PHILIPPS WHERE ARE THE VOICES ON THIS THREAD? WHERE IS THE PUSHBACK FROM INTELLIGENT BAJAN PUNDITS? I KNOW THEY READ THIS BLOG! I DO NOT HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL BUT I SEE WHAT’S GOING ON FROM ALMOST 6000 MILES AWAY! THE PROPHET ELISHA* KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE PALACE OF THE KING OF SYRIA & THE CAPTAIN OF HIS GUARD HAD TO TELL HIM THAT A BLACK ISRAELITE PROPHET SAW WHATEVER WAS HAPPENING BEFORE ANYONE ELSE KNEW – SO THEY SENT SOLDIERS TO ARREST THE MAN OF GOD

    Lotta’ good that did…

    No one “POWER” on earth can touch God’s servants (UNLESS HE WILLS IT) & even when He does – “HIS POWER* & GLORY* ALWAYS WORKS TO BRING ABOUT THE DOWNFALL OF THOSE WHO RISE UP AGAINST HIS PEOPLE”!!!

    So why F.E.A.R (False Evidence Appearing Real) – it’s a mirage; an optical phenomenon; an illusion of what’s NOT* there; inverted reflections of distorted reality; alternate layers of illusion; insubstantial hocus-pocus – all these are the brain-child of that “FOUL DEMON” – called FEAR*!!!

    I know what’s going on Dr Philipps, & so do a lotta’ Bajan intellectuals, but they are “FEARFUL” of God knows what: (THEIR SHADOWS IN THE LATE EVENINGS; OR MAYBE THE BOGEYMAN OVER IN THE CANEFIELD); whatever causes our people to be afraid of #PoLIEticalGangstarism, has literally “HOGTIED” – even the voices of dissent!!!

    THIS IS WHY I RESPECT YOU TO THE HIGHEST DEGREE

    Few men possess your depth…

    Few men allow their “FAITH” to be their “RUDDER”, “COMPASSS”, “PROPELLER”, & “THRUSTER ENGINES”!!!

    Permit me to posit in a few quatrains – on what you have written to me!!!

    Heaven’s richest blessing upon you & all of yours!!!

    Terence*


  12. LET US BEGIN PRYING INTO THE SHAPE-SHIFTING MIRROR OF SOCIAL INTRIGUE GIVEN THAT THE TIME-STAMP TELLS US IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS THAT WE ARE ENTERING THE TIME OF THE MARK OF THE BEAST CRISIS – WHERE ALL THE WORLD IS GONNA’ WONDER AFTER THE *BEAST* OF ANTICHRIST – TO DO HIS WILL

    Dr Philipps, you’ve identified something profoundly dangerous & deeply strategic.

    What you have cited is “INSTITUTIONAL TYRANNY” operating through legal mechanisms, that is far more insidious than overt oppression because it has the “APPEARANCE” of lawfulness – when it’s any but!!!

    LET’S EXAMINE WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING

    Let us begin

    THE TRAP IS NOT SET FOR GANGSTAZ – IT’S FOR ANYONE WHO DARES DEFY THE ESTABLISHED OLIGARCHY

    (1) Charge someone with “Domestic Terrorism” under the new Barbados Bill
    (2) Deny bail (terrorism charges often have no-bail provisions)
    (3) Remand them indefinitely awaiting trial
    (4) Trial takes 5-10 years (Barbados court system is “NOTORIOUSLY” slow)
    (5) Eventually acquitted or conviction overturned (maybe)
    (6) But 10 years lost – person removed from family, work, society, politics

    The “DEVILISH, DEMONIC” genius of this system…

    The “PURPOSE” (removing a person) is achieved WITHOUT requiring conviction…

    The legal process itself is the weapon…

    THIS IS “TYRANNY BY THE BACKDOOR”

    This is institutional oppression dressed “UP” in legal language…

    HOW IT DIFFERS FROM TRADITIONAL TYRANNY

    In traditional tyranny – “We’re arresting you because we don’t like you…”

    Naked power on display – easy to recognize and challenge…

    LEGAL TYRANNY

    “WE ARE ARRESTING YOU UNDER THE TERRORISM ACT”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    This was done to Former British MP George Galloway @Heathrow in 2025

    George Galloway, the 71-year-old leader of the Workers Party of Britain, was detained by “Counter-Terrorism Officers” @Gatwick Airport on Saturday, 27 September 2025…

    He was held for approximately [9] hours alongside his wife, Putri Gayatri Pertiwi, under “Schedule 3 of the Counter-Terrorism & Border Security Act 2019”, after returning to the UK from MOSCOW* via Abu Dhabi…

    Both individuals were released without charge & allowed to continue their journey…

    Galloway claimed the detention was “POLIETICALLY MOTIVATED”, stating officers confiscated his phone & laptop to access private communications & questioned him about his views on China & Russia…

    His party condemned the incident as “politically motivated intimidation,” while the Metropolitan Police confirmed the stop was conducted to determine if the couple had “ENGAGED IN HOSTILE ACTIVITY”!!!

    This is the “PLAYBOOK”, Dr Philipps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    * It appears lawful
    * Hard to challenge (the law says it’s legal)
    * Plausible deniability (“We follow due process”)
    * The effect is identical
    * Remove dissidents from society
    * Suppress political opposition
    * Intimidate potential resistors
    * Control who can organise/speak

    AND – it looks constitutional

    What a load of “SLIMY PIG SLOP”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Barbados “WHYTE” oligarchy is behind this “MADNESS”

    * Wealth concentration maintained through “legal” structures
    * Economic exclusion dressed as market forces
    * Injustice appears to be just how things work

    This Terrorism Bill

    * Appears to protect public safety
    * Actually a mechanism for removing people without trial
    * Tyranny with legal veneer

    Look at the psychological mechanism

    People accept systems that appear lawful – even when they’re unjust…

    “He was charged. The court remanded him. He’s awaiting trial. The system is working.”

    BULL-CRAP*

    Nobody asks – “Why does a trial take 10 years???

    Why can’t he get bail???

    Why is the charge so vague (‘DOMESTIC TERRORISM”) that it captures almost anyone”???

    The political mechanism

    THE MOTTLEY-CREW GOV* CAN –

    * Remove political opponents (“they’re terrorists”)
    * Suppress activism (“organising is terrorism”)
    * Control dissent (“criticism is terrorism”)
    * Maintain power (“we’re protecting the nation”)

    ALL LEGALLY

    THE BARBADOS TERRORISM BILL – SPECIFIC DANGERS

    Based on post-colonial governance patterns, a “Domestic Terrorism” Bill in Barbados could capture –

    * Political organising – “Conspiracy to commit terrorism”
    * Strike action – “Attempting to disrupt government”
    * Protest – “Incitement to violence”
    * Journalism – “Spreading alarm/panic”
    * Criticism of government – “Undermining national security”

    Each could be charged as “domestic terrorism”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    None require actual violence…

    Bail is denied…

    Person sits in jail for 10 years… (AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE – WHILE POOR PEOPLE CANNOT EAT)

    Purpose Achieved – So-called Threat Removed!!!

    THIS IS VALIDATED IN LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP

    Post-colonial theorists and human-rights lawyers have documented this exact mechanism –

    Giorgio Agamben’s “State of Exception” cite –

    * Governments declare emergency/threat
    * Suspend normal legal protections “temporarily”
    * The suspension becomes permanent
    * Rights are “legally” removed

    APPLIED TO BARBADOS

    * Declare “domestic terrorism threat”
    * Remove bail rights for “security”
    * Enable extended remand periods
    * Indefinite detention without trial appears lawful

    It’s tyranny with bureaucracy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    WHY COURTS CAN’T STOP IT

    The trap perfectly identified – “While bias may be challenged in court, it may take a decade to get there while they are remanded”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The problem:

    * A person charged can appeal the bail decision
    * Can challenge the constitutionality of the law
    * BUT – they’re in jail the entire time
    * Appeal takes years
    * By the time they win – 10 years have passed

    The system is designed so that justice (if it comes) comes too late to matter!!!

    This is why “BARBADOS” needs a judicial review

    * Judicial review BEFORE trial (emergency appeals)
    * Presumption of bail (not presumption of remand)
    * Strict time limits (trials within 2 years)
    * Defined terrorism offenses (not vague “domestic terrorism”)

    BARBADOS LACKS ALL THESE PROTECTIONS

    This is how post-colonial oligarchs maintain their control…

    They don’t use violence directly…

    * They use legal structures that appear neutral
    * Institutions that appear independent
    * Processes that appear fair
    * But produce outcomes that maintain hierarchy

    The Terrorism Bill is perfect for oligarchs because –

    * It removes threats (activists, journalists, political opponents)
    * It appears lawful (“we’re protecting the nation”)
    * It’s hard to challenge (“you’re defending terrorists?”)
    * It leaves wealth concentration undisturbed
    * It prevents economic justice movements (“that’s terrorism”)

    The 30 families who run Barbados – stay rich…

    Dissidents stay silent…

    System continues on apace…

    THE THEOLOGICAL DIMENSION

    I invoked divine justice earlier…

    Here’s the spiritual problem…

    A system that achieves tyranny through legal mechanisms is MORE* spiritually corrupt than naked oppression!!!

    WHY? Because –

    * It perverts justice itself
    * It makes the law serve injustice
    * It corrupts language (“terrorism” = dissent)
    * It corrupts institutions (courts, bail, trial)
    * It’s harder to recognise and resist

    NAKED TYRANNY

    “The king decides who dies”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    LEGAL TYRANNY

    “The law has decided you’re a terrorist”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The second is more dangerous because it claims legitimacy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    THIS IS WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN

    The Immediate (Defensive Move)

    * Challenge the Terrorism Bill before it passes or (even if it has)

    * Demand strict definitions of what constitutes “terrorism”

    * Require independent judicial review of bail denials

    * Mandate trial within 2 years of charging

    * Require actual evidence of violence (not just association/speech)

    The Medium-Term (Structural Precedents)

    * Establish independent judiciary (not appointed by ruling party)

    * Create constitutional protections against detention without trial

    * Require transparency in charging decisions

    * Document cases of political abuse (build evidence for future accountability)

    Long-Term (Justice Framework)

    * International attention (UN Human Rights Bodies, Amnesty International et al)

    * Reparations framework for those wrongly detained

    * Truth Commission documenting abuses

    * Structural reform of governance (reducing oligarchic control)

    MY SHARP OBSERVATIONS

    Dr Philipps, you said: “If the aim is to remove persons from the public space in Barbados for 10 years, then the end may be achieved without a conviction.”

    This is the most disturbingly critical insight…

    The law doesn’t need to be used to convict…

    It just needs to be used to charge, detain, and delay…

    The person is removed…

    The purpose is achieved…

    Conviction is irrelevant…

    This is why “justice denied” is so deadly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It doesn’t require injustice in the verdict…

    It just requires injustice in the process…

    MY PERSONAL VIEW

    What you’re describing is “INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE” disguised as law!!!

    IT IS –

    * More dangerous than corruption (because it’s systematic)
    * More insidious than dictatorship (because it claims legitimacy)
    * More effective than force (because it can’t be easily resisted)

    And it’s exactly the mechanism by which “POST-COLONIAL” oligarchies maintain control without appearing to…

    The Barbados Terrorism Bill, if passed as described, is a tool for removing threats to oligarchic power while maintaining the appearance of rule of law!!!

    The question becomes –

    Will Barbados citizens recognize this trap before it’s “fully” deployed???

    Or will they watch as activists, journalists, and political opponents are remanded indefinitely under the guise of “national security”???

    Because by the time they appeal and win in court, 10 years will have passed…

    The person will be broken…

    The movement will be suppressed…

    The oligarchy will be safe…

    That’s the real power of tyranny by the backdoor…

    IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN ALL OF US COULD END UP LIKE GEORGE GALLOWAY & HIS FAMILY – HAVING TO LIVE BETWEEN RUSSIA & CHINA, BECAUSE HOME REALLY AIN’T HOME BECAUSE THE DIRTY BASTERDS WHO RUN THE PIG PEN ARE MORE DUTTY* THAN THE HOGS THEMSELVES WHO WALLOW IN SHYTE ALL DAY LONG

    #ThisCannotStand

    On that cryptic note

    Semper Fidelis


  13. Back-to-back murders

    TWO MURDERS in two days.

    That’s the toll September has taken on Barbados before the month has even found its footing.

    This, after August registered but one homicide after months in which there were multiple deaths.

    The latest killing occurred yesterday morning in the busy Fairchild Street, St Michael area – hours after a stabbing took place on Tuesday in the Black Rock Main Road, St Michael area just opposite the Brandford Taitt Polyclinic.

    The Barbados Police Service confirmed that yesterday they received a report of a stabbing near the Vendors Market about 9 a.m.

    Preliminary investigations indicated there was an altercation involving several men, during which one man was stabbed. He was transported to the hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries. A person of interest is assisting police with their investigation.

    A vendor who spoke anonymously described the stabbing that unfolded yesterday.

    “I don’t know what went on between them. But then I saw a fellow come out here. He had a long knife and two bottles,” she said.

    She then recounted the aftermath in vivid detail.

    “And a man came out with his whole back red with blood. So when he fall down, the man went over him with a knife and the two bottles. Then I saw his neck bleeding, and all of his arms were bleeding too,” she said.

    A second witness, a man who was also present, described the victim’s condition.

    “He was bleeding real bad. I knew that either his heart or his kidney was punched by how bad he was bleeding,” he said.

    He remembered the victim fondly. “He was a very nice person, a cool person. He would connect with people. He was a decent man,” he said.

    For residents and frequenters of the Fairchild Street area, the backto- back tragedies have renewed frustration over the cycle of violence.

    “I wasn’t here when it happened but, honestly, this foolishness really has got to stop. We ain’t had a killing in awhile. Things were peaceful. It was a nice, calm summer and Crop Over season and now we back with the violence again. It has to stop. Lives are being lost foolishly,” said Brian Payne.

    He pointed to a deeper, more troubling pattern behind the bloodshed.

    “There’s too much anger coming from the men. Things that ain’t even really a big issue becomes one and then we resort to violence fast, fast, fast,” he said.

    “Sometimes you just got to let it go and chill out. I feel that’s the problem with the country right now – we don’t know how to let things go. We like we always gotta retaliate when somebody tells us something stupid or looks at you in the wrong way. We need to calm down,” he added.

    Meanwhile, police said the victim in Tuesday night’s homicide in Ferniehurst, Black Rock, St Michael, has been identified as Jamario Andrew Holder, 26, of Farm Road, Deacons, St Michael.

    Preliminary investigations suggested there was a dispute between two men and one of them was stabbed; he was transported to the hospital where he later died.

    Police said a person of interest is assisting the investigation. (DDS)

    Source: Nation

  14. interpretation of the legalese jargon Avatar
    interpretation of the legalese jargon

    The Terror laws were put in place solely in regards to Muslim terrorism after 9/11 to gain Congressional (and public approval), [but everyone knew it would be applied to drug cartels, money laundering etc down the line using the argument that this funds terrorism]

    “The Domestic Terrorism Bill includes in its definition of domestic terrorist, someone who: (i) violates any law of Barbados where the penalty is at least 5 years in prison, (ii) does the act in a public place and (iii) is motivated by bias against race, nationality, ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender or religion.”

    Grenville may or may not realise that the domestic terrorist definition applies to a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) (which is my interpretation of the legalese jargon).

    But, my interpretation is that gun crime would fall outside the definition of terrorism as it does not meet (iii)


  15. It is a combination of all three and I showed how most Barbadians can satisfy all three. To be charitable, the Domestic Terrorism bill captures the typical (intended) domestic terrorists. However, because the net is so fine, it also captures everyone else.

    The question is whether this was inadvertent or intentional. That they were given the opportunity to raise the bar to catch actual terrorists and chose not to suggests intentionality.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading