Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

COVID 19 Impact

One only has to drive pass the Grantley Adams International Airport (GAIA) any day of the week during the the 3PM to 6PM time slot to appreciate the debilitating effect the raging pandemic continues to wreck on the country’s main economic sector. The number of vehicles seen in the car park can be comfortably counted on a single hand.

Consistent with how Covid 19 has catspraddle business the recent posting of Goddards Enterprises 9 month unaudited financial statement paints the sorry tale.

The threat to a sustainable way of life is real!

The inability of key stakeholders – the Ministry of Education (MOE) and respective teacher’s unions to discuss Covid 19 protocols in a constructive environment in order to facilitate the commencement of the proposed September 21, 2020 term has come as no surprise. The relationship between successive governments, Barbados Secondary Teachers Union (BSTU) and Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT) has been unnecessarily acrimonious through the years. The same point made here about the failure to pass the Integrity in Public Life Bill is apt. All sides will never secure what they want, however, for the greater good there must be give and take.

Our leaders MUST find the solution to get the nation’s children back to school. All agree we have to find ways to coexist with Covid 19 because it will be with us for the foreseeable future even if a vaccine or therapeutic treatment is approved by end of year. This is not the time for the unions and MOE to engage in the usual pedantic offerings cloaked under the guise of industrial relations best practice. Children getting back to the classroom has wider implications for the country if we assess the relationship between home, school and work.

It was reported the 340 teachers and principals who turned up today for a general meeting called by the MOE had a constructive engagement. Let us hope attempts will be made to share findings with the executive of the BUT and BSTU to ensure there is consensus on the best way forward. Although the unions are important stakeholders the MOE has the responsibility to lead the process.

The issue of the reopening of schools is one high on the agenda for almost every country in the world. The risk benefit to decisions taken by the MOE must be data driven. There is the reality we have to accept that COVID 19 is active in the environment we have to exist, therefore there is an inherent risk to being infected. This means controls to mitigate must be well thought out, publicised, monitored and enforced. As adults – MOE, BSTU, BUT and others – we have a legal and moral duty to protect our children during one of the most frightening periods in the existence of humankind.

The feedback coming from some teachers that they are on vacation and should not have been asked to attend the meeting held today must be regarded as a minority view. If it is not then may God help us if this level of mentality exist. The government is on record declaring its committent to pay the large public sector wage bill until the economy improves. One thing the economists agree on is that it takes an economy longer to grow than it takes to contract. The time is coming soon when the government will have to start printing money and with it the implications for negative impact on the foreign reserves. The Freundel Stuart government found itself in a similar situation of printing money to pay public servants, a reread of archived central bank reports should remind us how that played out. Should we have the infants do a performance of ‘there’s a hole in my bucket dear Liza? This is not time for the usual political rhetoric.

We acknowledge the concerns of all sides.

We have to ensure the environment is safe for our students.

We have to ensure the method to deliver the curriculum ensures no child is left behind.

The use of the repetitive WE is not accidental.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 responses to “Back to School AND No Child Must Be Left Behind”


  1. I am sure most persons would love to know when school will re open since the children are eating them out of house and home. I figured at this time parents would like to hear what the need of the teachers are so the protocols put in place would not cause any problems with their child and the teacher,or the teacher and the parents, that will impact the delivery of education. When it was computer time some teachers did not even come on to offer work.what will happen if the protocols don t suit them,?
    This is one of the most important things that all parties should focus on. I am tired of party and politics. I am also tired of Mr Franklin jumping up at everything there are times when you observe,
    We as Barbadians love to complain , love to feel as though we have all the answers to the problems but still at square one. Thanks to covid 19 we should get a glimpse of who really want to work and to do a good job at it. If you are working please give it your best there are people out there who gave it their best but home and the worst are left.


  2. Santia, BUT hit back at Franklyn
    by CARLOS ATWELL
    carlosatwell@nationnews.com
    BOTH MINISTER OF EDUCATION Santia Bradshaw and Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT) general secretary Herbert Gittens have struck back at Opposition Senator Caswell Franklyn.
    The typically outspoken Franklyn, general secretary of Unity Workers Union, had blasted the teachers’ unions for being “feeble” in their response to what he said was Bradshaw overstepping her bounds by calling for a series of meetings with teachers.
    Franklyn said a minister is responsible for setting policy and an education minister was not supposed to be in direct communication with educators. He said, while the BUT and Barbados Secondary Teachers’ Union had voiced objections, they had been neutered and should have instructed their members to walk out if the minister spoke at the meeting.
    But yesterday, both Bradshaw and Gittens determined Franklyn was the one who was overstepping.
    After meeting with more than 400 primary school teachers in the Wildey Gymnasium, Bradshaw said it would never be her intention to keep herself apart from the people.
    Other jurisdictions
    “We cannot have a situation where, as Minister of Education trying to look at policies, that I am not in a position to speak to the widest set of stakeholders as possible and when you look at other jurisdictions, the practice is [that] Ministers of Education go directly to teachers, parents and ancillary staff,” she countered.
    Bradshaw said the meetings, which will continue tomorrow with nursery teachers in the morning and special needs teachers in the afternoon, was precisely the medium through which she could meet with stakeholders in a forum without fear of victimisation and with officials willing to listen.
    “We’ve gotten too accustomed to the previous administration not speaking through its leadership, which has frustrated Barbadians. I recognise people want to be heard and I cannot put myself in a position where I do not consult the wider [society] . . . and I will continue to engage with teachers in any forum of this nature.
    “[Senator Franklyn’s] comments are very archaic. I have been elected to speak to the people, he has been selected. I cannot be bound by traditions
    created by those who have long passed this life, I have to respond to what the people want and that is a genuine need for consultation,” she said.
    As for the union’s stance on their executives abstaining from attending the meetings, the Minister of Education said unions would “continue to be entertained” but she planned to continue to speak directly with teachers at every possible opportunity, at least once a term.
    She said it was “unfortunate” teachers were feeling “disillusioned” by their representatives but the teachers now better understood she was there to hear from them, adding she was looking forward to those teachers who did not attend the meeting to make their concerns known via email or whichever other forum they chose.
    Gittens, for his part, said Franklyn needed to direct his comments to the right places and it was disrespectful for a union leader to speak about his fellow unions in such a manner.
    “He could be more tempered. To make comments that the unions don’t know what they are doing is disrespectful. You do your thing, we’ll do ours, Mr Franklyn. Just because he knows a little law does not make the rest of us stupid,” he said.
    Gittens said the BUT had no issue with the meetings but the ministry had disrespected them by refusing to answer correspondence to meet with the unions prior.
    “The ministry knows the
    unions are the legal representatives of the teachers but they have said the meetings are not for the unions. It’s just interesting that when anything comes up, the minister gets broadcast while the unions get a little piece,” he said.
    As for the meeting, Bradshaw said they discussed sanitisation, time-tabling, the blended system, technology, special needs training and more. She said the issues were well ventilated and more consultations were to come.

    Source: Nation


  3. Redman: No fight with ministry
    PRESIDENT OF THE Barbados Secondary Teachers’ Union (BSTU), Mary Redman, has reiterated there is no impasse between the teachers’ body and the Ministry of Education.
    But, the long-time president said communication remained the key issue if the two parties were to forge ahead with finding the best way for a restart of classes for students.
    Redman made that clear while making a contribution on Starcom Network’s Down To Brass Tacks call-in programme yesterday after several callers weighed in on the back and forth between the union and the Ministry of Education.
    Minister of Education Santia Bradshaw met with hundreds of secondary school teachers at a special consultation on Tuesday at the Wildey Gymnasium, at a time when the BSTU and the Barbados Union of Teachers said they believed dialogue should be first held with unions instead.
    Redman said it was always the BSTU’s intention to find the best way forward for not only teachers, but for the thousands of students who could be affected. She noted that in June, the BSTU had even sent off a document to the Ministry of Education outlining suggestions that could positively effect change during a COVID-19 environment.
    “There is no impasse between the BSTU and the ministry,” Redman asserted. “We at the union are ready and willing to assist in all ways possible,” she added.
    However, she said it was important to know the BSTU did not issue any instruction or directive to its members not to attend the meeting held on Tuesday.
    “We held a Zoom meeting on Monday evening with our members, which was very well attended, and having heard the issues in detail, it was a general consensus taken that they would not attend unless the minister could make some provision for them to attend by Zoom,” she said.
    Redman said a letter containing that information was hastily despatched to Bradshaw that evening.
    Zoom element
    “We again expressed our reservations based on the structure of the proposed meetings that was laid out to us. We agreed to what the ministry told us last Wednesday. We tried to convince our members to turn up at the meeting. We also indicated at that meeting there was a need to have a Zoom element to that meeting,” she added.
    The BSTU boss said some members made it clear they would not have felt comfortable being in a meeting with 400 people.
    “We are very aware that many of our teachers have
    co-morbidities and they are fearful. We felt that any meeting that the minister wants to hear from the teacher body should not have a structure that is prejudicial towards those unable to attend. And so we asked for a Zoom element to the meeting.”
    The BSTU president said Acting Chief Education Officer Joy Adamson agreed to pass on that information to the Minister of Education. However, she said, the very next day an email arrived indicating the meetings would be held and condensed into two large sessions, one for primary schools and another for secondary schools.
    She said that change came “with no explanation, no prior notification, so we could not provide any satisfaction or reason to members, who were very distressed at the thought of having to go into a meeting with potentially almost 2 000 people”.
    Redman said members felt insulted that reasons for the changes were not communicated and felt further insulted at how the entire process was handled. (BA)

    Source: Nation News


  4. Teachers heard
    Meeting with minister pleasing to some
    DESPITE SOME early grumblings, many of the approximately 400 primary school teachers who attended yesterday’s meeting with the Ministry of Education gave it a passing grade.
    The meeting held at the Wildey Gymnasium began half an hour late at 10 a.m. and before the start, some teachers expressed dissatisfaction with the levels of communication, saying they were upset there had not been official notification concerning the beginning of the next school term.
    However, following the four-hour meeting, some said it had been fruitful.
    Ava Greenidge said much progress had been made. “Many people had the opportunity to have their questions answered and I got the impression that with this consultation the ministry wants what’s best going forward. We teachers have been labelled as lazy by the public for not wanting to return to school, but we just want to make sure the children are taken care of. Teachers are anxious, ready and committed and its time we were respected. I believe progress has been made today which augers well for the future,” she said.
    Teacher Charmine Ottley said they were listened to, adding she was ready for face-to-face teaching.
    “We voiced our concerns and they were readily addressed. It seems many teachers welcomed that opportunity to have a one-on-one with the minister and the ministry officials. I’m ready to return to the classroom. I’ve had enough of virtual teaching, it’s hurting my eyes,” she said.
    Ottley said she was unionised but decided to attend the meeting as the ministry had requested a roundtable where everyone would be heard, noting she believed this was important.
    Executives of the Barbados Union of Teachers, the Barbados Secondary Teachers’ Union and the Unity Trade Union were not in attendance at the meetings which started Tuesday when the ministry met with secondary school teachers, and recommended their members also stay away due to health and safety and other reasons. However, as the invitations were for individuals and not unions, it was up to each teacher whether they opted to go.
    Some other teachers yesterday only spoke on condition of anonymity. One said he was glad he attended the meeting.
    “I’m glad I came, it wasn’t a waste of time. The one thing that was not fully addressed though was what teachers who were parents would do with the blended system if they were scheduled to be at work and their children at home. Still, they said there would be further consultation.” The teacher praised the contribution of specially invited guest, Minister of People Empowerment Cynthia Forde, a former teacher who they said had a firm grasp of the issues.
    Another teacher said the ministry was “talking sense”.
    “They spoke about the need for solidarity between the unions, teachers and the ministry. They also spoke about greater parent involvement and greater respect for teachers, especially from the ministry and the public. There were a lot of insightful comments,” they said.
    Another teacher said she appreciated the collaboration as the ministry would be using the feedback from the teachers and combine everyone’s ideas to come up with a “concrete plan” on how schools would be operating now with COVID-19 and beyond.
    (CA)

  5. Critical Analyzer Avatar
    Critical Analyzer

    Caswell Franklyn is right.

    Government Ministers have been overstepping their bounds and being too hands-on with their ministries and doing their permanent secretary’s job. I don’t know if the ministers have not been told their role is akin to that of a chairman of a company board responsible for developing, approving and funding overall policies while the permanent secretaries’ (Chief Education Officer) job is akin to the president of a company where he/she manages staff, implements said policies and recommends changes based on their experience, training and feedback from their staff. If ministers keep stepping on the permanent secretary’s toes, let’s get rid of the PS job and save that money.

    At this stage of the consultation, the only persons meeting with teachers should be ministry officials. The most the minister should have been doing is giving a kick-off speech at the start of the meeting defining the goals and how the information gathered from the ministry-teacher consultation will be used. That kick-off speech should have been done online and placed on youtube with the consultation being private.


  6. You will note from the press that the PS confirmed she issued the invitation supported by communication from the minister. Who to blame. We live in extraordinary times.

    Are we there yet??


  7. @David
    “You will note from the press that the PS confirmed she issued the invitation supported by communication from the minister.”

    That should read the CEO not PS, but yes you are very correct. Extraordinary times!

    Didn’t this same minister “invite herself” without resistance to one Union’s Annual General Meeting and spoke with the members there and then???

    Just observing


  8. @Observing

    Thanks!

    Will the real leaders please stand up?

    >

  9. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David Bu
    Good post as usual. I think some commenters are unaware how policy is determined and who is responsible for policy in the Westminster form of Governance. The minister is responsible for policy,but the formulation of policy is an iterative process between the governed,the technocrats, and the government. Minister Santia Bradshaw is an exemplary practitioner of this model. She knows she does not have all the answers and she seeks feedback and inputs from other relevant stakeholders. I notice this very early in her political career. It blossomed in her handling of the COVID crisis ,when she acted as PM.

    We have a practical problem of getting our children back into schools,with expert teachers. A machine and parents stressed out and untrained in education is a recipe for disaster.


  10. @ Vincent

    Is implementation not the responsibility of the technocrats and the formulation of policy the responsibility of the elected ministers (government)? Afterall that is what they were elected for. Civil servants do not make policy. That IS the Westminster form of government.


  11. However, in yet another blistering response, Bradshaw vowed not to be constrained by “outdated” practices that have outlived their usefulness.

    “I can’t be a minister trying to shape policy without being able to engage with the people who will help me implement the policy, and therefore the approach taken and the comments made by Senator Franklyn are unfortunate, because I cannot be held to a position that was taken out of custom and practice over 30 of 40 years ago when the demands of our society today require that we consult,” she said on Wednesday.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2020/08/27/minister-promises-to-keep-engaging-teachers/

  12. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    @ Critical Analyser just like Caswell you are using “officialese” giving the impression that the Minister is bypassing the “chain of command” at the Ministry giving some indication that she has lost confidence in ministry officials!!!!!. This is not a typical “Ministry vs Teachers” confrontation in the direct sense..this is a govt via the MOE trying to facilitate teachers in a consultative process whereby the Govt is trying to find a way forward for the education system in a COVID-19 environment as it stands in Barbados!!!!!. The “dispute” is specifically how that process should happen. If anything the Minister MIGHT be forcing the issue in trying to make these meetings come to fruition. In THIS specific case…for the minister to have to communicate to teachers via ministry officials would just be a senseless use of bureaucracy that would unnecessarily slow down this process!!!!.

  13. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Hal Austin

    My intervention did not address the implementation of policy. It spoke to the formulation of policy : How to have a seamless reopening of schools . What you said about implementation is true but previous and certainly not in dispute by any of the commenters.

  14. Critical Analyzer Avatar
    Critical Analyzer

    @Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV
    Let me simplify my position in as few words as possible. The minister is too involved in the day to day running of her ministry.

    I see the meeting as the first consultation in the long Re-opening School Policy creation process which should ONLY have been amongst the Chief Education Officer and other ministry official and the teachers at this stage. I am not saying the minister cannot play a minor role in the meeting e.g. speaking about her expectations for the meeting BUT she cannot take a major part in the meeting itself. Teachers must be free to air their ideas and concerns without the added pressure of a minister being there.


  15. Barbados used to have a structured Civil service with mostly competent leaders.

    Each ministry had a Permanent secretary, Deputy permanent secretaries Senior civil servants.

    Wha happen ? Did the good ones all die out ?

  16. Critical Analyzer Avatar
    Critical Analyzer

    @Hants
    They put Acting before all their names for longer than 3-6 months so they must tow the line or we will send you back to your substantive position after spending x years doing the job with a big drop in salary. They tore that page from the DLP playbook.


  17. WE ARE LED TODAY BY INFERIOR SUPERIORS


  18. “[Senator Franklyn’s] comments are very archaic. I have been elected to speak to the people, he has been selected. I cannot be bound by traditions
    ++++++++++++++++
    In Bajan parlance “Know yuh place”

    Waiting for the rejoinder

    And the beat goes on


  19. @ Vincent

    If the minister if responsible for policy, but the civil servants are responsible for formulation of policy, are you saying the minister is handed policy and told to go and promote it by the civil servants?
    To formulate means to create and that is the role of the government; in any case that IS NOT the so-called Westminster/Whitehall model of governance.

  20. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Hal Austin at 10:01 AM

    I posit no such statement. I will therefore ignore it. Please reread my interventions on this matter.

  21. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Hants at 9:53 AM

    The structure is still in place . The post holders have to carry the skill, the know how, and the professional ethics to these positions. Some of them are more confused than the commenters on this blog as to their power,responsibilities and the “savoire faire”.


  22. NOT ONLY WE ARE LED TODAY BY INFERIOR SUPERIORS
    MOST WHO POST ON BU ARE OF INFERIOR INTELLECT TOO

  23. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    Thanks for the upload.


  24. @ Vincent

    Good post as usual. I think some commenters are unaware how policy is determined and who is responsible for policy in the Westminster form of Governance. The minister is responsible for policy,but the formulation of policy is an iterative process between the governed,the technocrats, and the government…..(Quote)

    The formulation of policy is nothing to do with any iterative process between the governed, the technocrats and the government, if by the governed you mean the electorate, the technocrats (civil servants) and government.
    Policy is absolutely, 100 per cent, the role of government. The only role the governed play is by electing the government; and the civil servants implement policy.

  25. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Hal Austin at 11:03 AM

    If that is your belief and your reality. So be it. In passing may I suggest that you ponder the word “Iterative”?


  26. @ Vincent

    I am familiar with the conventional linguistic definition, what is yours? I am saying simply that government makes policy, civil servants implement it and the governed vote for governments through their manifestos.
    By the way, at a time when the Barbados economy is in terrible trouble, and the dollar is plummeting, we are here talking about the Westminster/Whitehall model of policy-making.


  27. @Vincent

    Your simple point is understood. One cannot formulate good policy without a quality information gathering exercise whatever form it takes. In a covid 19 world this becomes an even more important tactic. Forget the past, forget officialese, we are here now.


  28. Hal Austin

    By the way, at a time when the Barbados economy is in terrible trouble, and the dollar is plummeting, we are here talking about the Westminster/Whitehall model of policy-making

    Xxxxx
    Rabbit hole politics on BU everday nothing more to be expected
    Nelson had a long run
    Moving forward on the agenda is Trump
    Soon to follow would be Quaker John and his usual historical waffle of religious groups and off springs
    The Ministry of education and its leader are out to sea without a life raft on Covid
    There is no set model on how schools must be opened also parents have a right to enter the dialogue with these called meetings
    Yesterday meeting shows no purpose of finding a balanced and fair solution
    But then again this is a govt who relies on political posturing to make a point


  29. @ Mariposa

    You are on the ball. We have a president, a former minister of education, a current minister, both talking about blending education, as if it is cheap whisky, and holistic education, as if it is a lesson from some Indian mystic.
    After 14 years of Arthur, ten years of Stuart/Thompson, and two years of Mottley, we still do not have a clear educational policy. We do not have t o go back to Barrow’s introduction of ‘free’ secondary education.
    A few years ago Dr Byer Suckoo raised the issue of the future of work and it went down like a damp squib. It is still a subject waiting to be debate.
    In the meantime, we still have an 11+ based on essays in English, Comprehension (English again) and maths. And the bright, clever clogs are asking for it to be banned.
    In the meantime, the wealthy and professional middle classes game the system by sending their little Johnnies and Joannas to private primary schools, which give t hem expert tuition to pass the 11+ and entry in to the top secondary schools.
    So privilege continues to go on and on and on without a single word in opposition by politicians and political activists. In the meantime, BU continues to play its role in misdirecting the people of Barbados.

    .


  30. @Vincent
    Your simple point is understood. One cannot formulate good policy without a quality information gathering exercise whatever form it takes. In a covid 19 world this becomes an even more important tactic. Forget the past, forget officialese, we are here now.
    +++++++++++

    What does this mean?

  31. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    @ Critical Analyser be that as it may, not withstanding prior cases where the Minister(s) or a Chairman of a board directly interfaces with “line workers”.There is a right way and a wrong way of doing such… If a minister does it and totally ignores the bureaucracy i.e. keeps middle and senior mgmt out of the loop then i would say the minister is out of line….if a Minister or Chair does it in a way that includes the bureaucracy i see it as less of a problem… A minister or chairman may adopt a direct style because their position carries “weight” The reality is that line workers FEELS that their concerns may be addressed more urgently if they talk to persons higher up the “chain of command” directly. On THIS specific issue, it is not a matter that govt is setting policy and forcing it on teachers. this is an instance where a government is trying to start a consultative process to include teachers (line workers) and having the rest of the MOE into the loop.
    We are dealing with the education system. An important system on which a country depends upon to function just as important as the economic system to which the COVID-19 situation has hit both the hardest. To stress to allow the consultative process be facilitated only through bureaucratic lines is at this point ridiculous.

  32. Critical Analyzer Avatar
    Critical Analyzer

    The minister is in charge and she can do what ever she pleases but she has avoid overriding other person’s roles and responsibilities and appear dictatorial. We put her there to speak on the people’s behalf not to talk to the people.

    Here is the definition taken from the Ministry’s own site ( https://www.mes.gov.bb/About/Organisation /)

    Organisation

    The Ministry is headed politically by the Minister of Education, Technological and Vocational Training, Hon. Santia Bradshaw.

    The Ministry of Education, Technological and Vocational Training is headed at the administrative level by a Permanent Secretary and at the technical level by the Chief Education Officer. These officers are assisted by a Deputy Permanent Secretary, two Deputy Chief Education Officers and a cadre of staff at Ministry Headquarters.

    After reading this definition and watching the video posted by David at August 27, 2020 10:25 AM, what do you think?

    I don’t know what process the powers that be intend to follow to craft the policy but I do know it should follow an “Iterative” process (to steal Vincent Codrington’s word) that respects and allows everyone to play their proper role and should go something like this.

    Round 1 – Get all ideas and concerns into the Ministry’s hands
    Consultation meetings of the teachers with the PS, Deputy PS, CEO and Deputy CEOs in small groups to keep it manageable. Allow email submissions from parents/guardians and teachers unable to attend the meetings.

    Round 2 – Form the Draft policy
    The Minister, PS, Deputy PS, CEO and Deputy CEOs use all the feedback to craft the policy.

    Round 3 – Presentation of Draft policy
    The Minister, PS, Deputy PS, CEO and Deputy CEOs can now circulate the draft policy and get any additional feedback.

    That is the general idea of how any policy making process should be done.

  33. William Skinner Avatar

    I guess we will now proceed to conveniently abandon legislation and so on on the grounds that it is as all “legalese.” Amazing , just two years ago we were talking about the need for transparency and good governance.
    Why don’t we just outlaw workers unions and professional bodies and give the ministers/parliamentarians free reign.
    Well , as the oldsters say:“Everybody helps you to buy a big belly cow but they don’t help yuh feed um.”
    These days are funny nights.
    “Things get curiouser and curiouser.”


  34. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT WE CAN GET MEN WHO FAILED AT THE POLLS TO RUN THE COUNTRY?


  35. @ Critical Analyzer. Maybe, Caswell is promoting his Union by criticising the other Unions hoping a mass exodus will come join him. Politics and Union don’t mix.
    @ GP. Next thing you will say is ” All those students who failed the Common Entrance should attend Harrison College, Combermere, Queen’s College etc. Whilst the “A” Students should attend Daryll Jordan etc.

    NOT ONLY WE ARE LED TODAY BY INFERIOR SUPERIORS
    MOST WHO POST ON BU ARE OF INFERIOR INTELLECT TOO
    You say that with tongue in cheek……..


  36. RE @ GP. Next thing you will say is ” All those students who failed the Common Entrance should attend Harrison College, Combermere, Queen’s College etc. Whilst the “A” Students should attend Daryll Jordan etc.
    IT WOULD NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE SIR

    RE NOT ONLY WE ARE LED TODAY BY INFERIOR SUPERIORS
    MOST WHO POST ON BU ARE OF INFERIOR INTELLECT TOO
    You say that with tongue in cheek……

    ACTUALLY I MEAN THAT……IT IS VERY OBVIOUS TO ME..
    I SAY WHAT I MEAN AND MEAN WHAT I SAY

  37. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    It is the children that make the school ;not the school making the child. Each child makes his/her contribution to the ethos of the school. Until we get a scientific understanding of this issue we will always have this futile debate.


  38. Coronavirus: ‘Reassuring’ study of children’s ‘tiny’ risk https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53932294


  39. I am concerned that the Government plans to resume school using the blended instruction approach. This will result in children being home between 50% to 75% of the time they would normally be at school. There is no evidence that the rate of infection in Barbados warrants this excessive approach. The educational disparities are only going to widen with disastrous consequences.

  40. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Ping Pong
    I hope your post is untrue. We need to get back to face to face delivery of education. A form room for 30 students should hold 15 or 10 students comfortably with social distancing. Open air classes for music and nature studies. We need to be more creative in our use of space and teacher’s aids.


  41. If most if not all other professions are back to work operating under appropriate protocols what is so special about teachers?

  42. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU at 4:31 PM
    I pondered over that mystery as well. That is why I support the decision of wider consultations with members of the teaching and administrative staff at public schools.


  43. One thing that we can be certain of is that no matter what plans the government advances, some will support and some will oppose.

    Difference of opinions should be encouraged as ideas are more fully ventilated, but when it becomes ‘I must support/oppose the BLP’ then there is little or no value in having a discussion.


  44. The Ministry of Health mandated social distancing requirements will make face to face delivery of education difficult. What evidence is there that the rate of infection in Barbados is so high that social distancing is required in schools?


  45. If the typical class size is 30 students and the classrooms can only hold 15 students in accordance with social distancing requirements then where are the other 15 students to go? Answer: home.


  46. Blending education????? Ora holistic education??? A government without a compass.

  47. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Ping Pong.
    Home for half a day. That is better than whole day and no eye contact with teacher…. the expert on education. But like you, I would like a continuous review of the protocol for reducing/ eliminating the spread of COVID -19..


  48. New school plan
    Article by
    Barbados Today Published on
    September 3, 2020
    When school resumes on September 21, students in Nursery up to Infants B are expected to attend classes half-day, while older pupils in primary and secondary school will have a mix of face-to-face and online classes.

    This was revealed yesterday by Chief Education Officer Joy Adamson who said that following meetings with stakeholders, including teachers and their unions, the Ministry of Education had settled on these two approaches, although changes could be made.

    “Nobody has any answer for what school should look like. This is uncharted waters for us and therefore we would want the cooperation of parents, the cooperation of the general public to make sure that when we go back into school that we have that full cooperation. We might have to tweak things as we move along but that is expected,” she said during the latest online discussions staged by the Holy Trinity Anglican Church in St Philip.

    “The ideal situation is to go back as we were before with everybody going to school and everybody being taught . . . in a classroom, Monday to Friday. But we know with the protocols that really cannot happen.”

    The education chief added: “The two ideas we are looking at now is the shift system and we are proposing for the Nursery to Infants B go a shift. That means that you go half-day, . . . one group in the morning and another in the afternoon.”

    Conceding that this might present some challenges for parents, in terms of transportation and sanitizing between classes, Adamson said the Ministry was seeking the cooperation of employers ,the public and private sectors, as well as the support of relatives to assist parents who will be impacted.

    In addition, she said, there may be increased allocations from the Ministry of Finance for ancillary staff required to maintain sanitary standards at schools.

    “The second proposal, and the one that most people are accustomed to and are expecting, is the blended approach where you have some classes face-to-face in school and some classes online,” Adamson noted.

    She told the online Zoom discussion with almost 100 participants, and others following on Facebook: “We believe that if we get the cooperation from the parents, teachers, and we are working with the principals to put the protocols in place, that the two systems – the shift system for the 3 ½ to 6 ½ year-olds and then the blended approach for those from Class One to Class Four at primary, and all secondary schools where you do some face-to-face and some online – [can work].”

    Adamson was on a panel that also included principal of the St Michael School Dr Yvette Mayers; Hilda Skeene Primary School principal Ivan Clarke; and Dennis Jones, a Jamaican economist who was previously stationed in Barbados.

    In her contribution, Dr Mayers said any discussion on how schools would reopen should include students, teachers, parents, and non-academic staff.

    “As we look towards September, we know that the best place for our students is actually in school. In terms of getting the academics covered, dealing with the psycho-social needs, mental health issues, we need to be back in school. But COVID-19 will determine how best that happens,” she said.

    “If COVID-19 behaves itself and we can control it and we can ensure there is no community spread, then thankfully we should have our students back in school. However, at this stage we are preparing our schools for a reduced number of students in class, and right now, as we look at our timetables, it is a mammoth task to organize our schools in such a way that we cater to the needs of our students. Each year group will have different needs and we need to address those needs that students have.

    “We also need to look at the other persons on the school premises. What about the other members of staff? What are their needs? What are their fears? What are the fears of parents? When we come up to these blended approaches to learning, will parents be able to fit in with our plans for their children?” the secondary school principal questioned. (IMC1)

    Source: Barbados Today

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading