Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Barbados is fortunate to have Ross University relocating here, and our Prime Minister deserves credit for facilitating the move. This was a win for everyone: the University, which would have a wonderful location in the true land-of-the-free; the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre (LESC), which would be able to pay its bills and not be a drain on tax payers; but most importantly, ordinary households.

The severe austerity is impacting those with home mortgages, and to have the reported 1,000 students plus 300 staff paying perhaps $1,000 per month for a room in someone’s house, may save the house from foreclosure. If the mortgage has already been paid, then the money can be used to invest in the education of their children.

The immediate beneficiaries would likely have been those in close proximity to the LESC, who would have likely benefitted slimily as those near the University of the West Indies. However, given the LESC’s favourable location and Barbados’ radial road network, anyone living near Highways 4, 5 and 6 would have an advantage since it would be one bus ride to and from LESC.

Many homes are already prepared to host the students and staff, having upgraded their houses to accommodate visitors for the Cricket World Cup. The level of interaction should be beneficial to the families since these are post-graduate students, and the exchange of ideas can only benefit both parties. Well done Barbados!

Yesterday, to my dismay, I read that all Barbadian households were disqualified from offering their houses as accommodation to the students and staff. I learnt that only those small houses in the Coverley residential development, which are located far away from LESC, were approved for Ross University students and staff. I felt sick reading that even if students wanted to have accommodation at a Barbadian household, that they could not.

Something did not seem right. Certainly Ross University would correct this offensive news report, but it remained unchallenged. Hence, this article.

Why is this offensive behaviour being tolerated in Barbados? Everyone in a free country has the right to seek accommodation that they can afford. Even in countries that limit personal freedoms, like Cuba, Russia, China and North Korea, people can still choose to select affordable accommodations.

In Barbados, the only persons who do not have the choice of accommodations are inmates detained at Her Majesty’s Prisons (HMP) Dodds, the Psychiatric Hospital, and those who choose a military type regimen like the Youth Service and the Defence Force. Everyone else has a constitutional right to personal liberty where they can seek affordable accommodations.

Is there no lawyer in Barbados who can request a judicial review of this offensive contract? Is there no person at the Fair Trading Commission who can make a determination of the fairness of this contract? Why are we tolerating having Barbados’ reputation being damaged in this manner?

It actually gets worse, as if that were even possible. These approximately 1,000 sq ft area houses are reportedly being rented to accommodate 4 persons, who must each pay approximately US$1,000 per month in rent. What???

This rent is so ridiculously high that those 4 students can pool their rent money for 3 years and easily purchase the house that they are renting. They can then sell it, share it as a vacation home, or rent it to other students after they graduate? Clearly they would not even need to consider something so extreme if the rent was reasonable, but to not consider this investment opportunity would be financially irresponsible of them.

It is a well-known maxim that to understand what is really going on, one should follow the money. It has been reported that the houses at Coverley were not selling as expected. It seems that only a few favoured people are supposed to benefit from the relocation of Ross University.

While homeowners and others may mourn the loss of this economic opportunity, the real victims are the unsuspecting students – who are to be incarcerated at HMP Coverly.

Grenville Phillips II is a Chartered Structural Engineer and President of Solutions Barbados. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

237 responses to “The Grenville Phillips Column – Ross University – Hip Hip Hooray”


  1. Hi David:

    It seems that whenever Jeff and I are in discussion, you prematurely reach a conclusion and give me advice based on that premature conclusion. Please note the following.

    An honest discussion normally results in convergence to a point where a confident conclusion can be made.

    So far, we have converged to the idea that a private contract that violates a constitutional right that does not have an “Except with his consent” provision, is not legally enforceable in Barbados.

    It takes a while to reach convergence with Jeff because he consistently throws up straw men, knocks them down, and makes condescending remarks. Since I value discussion, I tolerate the games.

    The next stage in oure discussion is to see whether the constitutional right to personal liberty, which states: “No person shall be deprived of his personal liberty”, can be applicable to the Ross situation. Unfortunately, Jeff has already reached a conclusion without hearing another opinion. Once he has done that, then our previous interactions suggest that he is unlikely to examine any contrary evidence. So this discussion must regrettably end.

    For completion, the constitution lists 10 different reasons how a person can lose his constitutional right to personal liberty without his consent. Attending a school which mandates where the student shall live is not one of them, neither do any of these reasons appear to support Ross’ mandatory requirement.

    David. Please note that Jeff is a man. You seem bent on wanting me to bow before him, but he is not God. It would be wise for everyone to attach a high value to Jeff’s legal opinions. However, he is not infallible. That is why discussion is necessary, and should not be stifled.

    I do not accept that something is true simply because someone says that it is so – regardless of how learned he/she is. Any person making a claim of truth should be willing to discuss it so that others, and the one who made the claim, can converge (not be bullied) to the actual truth.


  2. Ross U is NOT AN IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITY…one expects to pay high costs in ivy league schools WHERE YA GET bang for your buck, Ross is not in that category…the rent is too HIGH and the young adults should have freedom to decide where they want to live, after the first year…this is a rip off..


  3. I never even heard of Ross University before the Dominica hurricane so it is obvious they are a fly by night operation that managed to slither into the Caribbean and settled for decades on the CHEAP, if they had used the name Devry, everyone would have known who and what they are….but Ivy League and top university they DEFINITELY are not..

    Bet ya will not find them listed in the usual books of top 100 universities in the world..


  4. @Grenville

    You need to read with understanding. The point being made is that the lead of a political party should be seized with how an agreement is applied under our laws/constitution to obviate this iterative engagement. The advice offered was to assist you in building credibility with a suspicious public. You are free to disregard the advice.

    Thanks for the reminder that Jeff is not God.


  5. Grenville IS consulting with a legal person, how well versed is in question…BUT..in Barbados again, the problem as ALWAYS..is INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW…12 lawyers will give you 25 different interpretations and then CONTRADICT THEMSELVES …just for good measure …so ya still will not get anywhere…with understanding the constitution or anything else legal…


  6. Mr. Phillips II

    You wrote: “Should we discourage undergraduate students from attending UWI if they cannot live on-campus because of the higher crime rates in Black Rock……..”

    Because I’m very familiar with the Black Rock area, I asked you to present your evidence or police stats to substantiate your claim.

    YOU REFUSED…….and in doing such, you’re essentially suggesting I “should take your word for it.”

    Then, “lo and behold,” you subsequently wrote: “

    “I DO NOT ACCEPT that something is TRUE simply because someone says that it is so – regardless of how learned he/she is. Any person MAKING a CLAIM of TRUTH should be WILLING to DISCUSS it so that others, and the one who made the claim, can converge (not be bullied) to the actual truth.”

    Why should I accept your claim of “higher crime rates in Black Rock” is true, “simply because you say that it is so,”………. and you’re unwilling to present any evidence to substantiate your claim or even discuss the issue?

    Is this not HYPOCRISY?

    Your hypocrisy is also exposed when you post articles to BU and contributors disagree with or are critical of you, you refuse to engage them in any further discussion.

    Is it not reasonable for us then to conclude you’re suggesting we should accept what you write is truth……… without challenging or questioning you?

    For an aspiring politician you are too “thin skinned” and arrogant, which does not make you any different from the present lot we have in parliament and the lot that was kicked out on May 24, 2018…….that are now restructuring to return to “feed from the trough.”

    People are desirous of a change………and should you continue with your attitude, you won’t get far in politics.


  7. More of the sane from the Salemite Abigail aka WARU. Ivy League universities’ medical school tuition fees are around $60,000 per year. Looks like Ross U clocks in at between $34,000 and $50,000. Monthly room rates: Harvard $1,680; UPenn $1,400 to $1,600; Yale $1,847 (board included; and Dartmouth $850 to $1,050. According to this article, Ross U is $1,000 per month. All fees quoted are in US. #butiamayardfowl


  8. The students would have completed registration where there was full disclosure. For a study to be complaining now what does it suggest? Grenville quotes a Barbados Today story we assume is accurate?


  9. But that is my point…Ross U’s fees are too high…they are not even within jumping distance of Ivy League status or qualifications, they were not even heard of before the hurricane…..and these same ivy leagues…allow students the FREEDOM of living OFF CAMPUS…after the FIRST.. YEAR..

    it is an insult..but ah leave yall to the parents…time is longer than twine..


  10. The students said over and over..that the school CHANGED INITIAL THE ARRANGEMENTS..


  11. The initial arrangements…that it is not what they initially agreed to…but it was too late to do anything about it…students make their plans sometimes a whole year in advance…loans already secured etc…..it was the typical bate and switch..

  12. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Mr Blogmaster, any sober review of Mr Phillips writings above would simply reflect on one cliched mantra that he believes that any public relations exposure – whatever the circumstances – is beneficial to him and his party.

    Your 4:37 AM is well noted and thus a reminder that the gentleman is just bluntly stubborn and so confirmed of his own correct operational path that he will forge ahead dismissing the carefully worded advice.

    It is nonsensical to debate with a very experienced law professor on fundamental points of law, just as it would be absurd to debate with an very experienced engineer on fundamental aspects of load, stress or building standards…yet the engineer does that here with the lawyer and uses a bold faced fallacious argument to hide – as @Artax said in a different context above – his hypocrisy.

    The subject matter expert (SME) on law said that “…the LIBERTY referred to here is freedom from incarceration, not the license to do whatever one wouldst. You must read the entire section, not merely the first few lines…”

    That is as simple and crystal clear as can be…Yet Mr Phillips still offers the retort that:

    “It takes a while to reach convergence with Jeff because he consistently throws up straw men, knocks them down, and makes condescending remarks. Since I value discussion, I tolerate the games…The next stage in [our] discussion is to see whether the constitutional right to personal liberty, which states: “No person shall be deprived of his personal liberty”, can be applicable to the Ross situation.”**

    Can you really perceive that a gentleman with his lengthy years of study CANNOT read with UNDERSTANDING and not grasp that THIS reference to personal liberty refers ONLY to incarceration in the CONTEXT of section 13 of the Constitution of Barbados. …There can be no next stage here…this clause (despite the legalese) appears to have absolutely no bearing WHATEVER on the Ross situation.

    Clearly, this debating ploy of deliberately accusing @Jeff of creating ‘straw” arguments and establishing a gross fallacy about reaching convergence cannot deflect from his confounding ability to continually take words out of context and argue absurdities!

    He is simply playing PR games in this public space and has your family member Mr BT defending such nonsense with rather impressive circuitous, ‘tautological’ gymnastics.


  13. That is why engineers should stick to engineering and not wander around in the mine field that is Barbados’ legislations and laws…Jeff TUTORS LAW..if I remember…it is constitutional law..not even I liked reading constitutional law.


  14. As a matter of fact, hated reading corporate law too, in my mind they are one and the same.


  15. Came across a link for Ross vetting process for students living on campus in St. Kitts
    Maybe it can give insight to procedure and process for Ross students in the carribbean

    veterinary.rossu.edu/life-in-st-kitts


  16. To explainthe sewage mess, a few would search for a similar occurrence elsewhere and mention it.

    The arguments the we are just doing what the D’s did when they were in power is a silly one.

    To quote Ivy League fees to support fees levied in Barbados is also silly. Is Ross U delivering an Ivy League education?


  17. Typical Bajan lackies … kowtowing to piss poor lawyers
    …because they happen to control the arrangement of writing and mismanaging a bunch of shiite laws
    THAT DO NOT WORK.
    Is it any wonder we are in such a mess?

    Jeff is particularly OUTSTANDING and different ….in that he actually explains the conundrum that we face…
    …where EVERYTHING about our legal system is completely SUBJECTIVE, open to interpretation… even arbitrary…
    AND makes a snail look like Bolt – the pace at which it works.

    Yet we have dribblers ..and even the boss David, asking us to kowtow and bow down… and get MORE ‘legal’ involvement in justice.

    Now if the shiite system was WORKING in any way….
    then OK…. IT ISN’T !!

    Grenville raises a question about JUSTICE and FAIRNESS ….
    …and unfortunately (as is his wont) he mentions some shiite about our ‘laws’… to sound impressive…

    and suddenly the whole discussion is about how lawyers (whatever the hell THAT means in Barbados) interpret some ridiculously written piece of nonsense….
    Why can we not discuss the substantive issue on its MERIT.
    The ‘Law’ should then reflect THAT consensus – IN SIMPLE English.
    No damn lawyers are needed for that exercise … just plain common sense….

    @ Artax
    Give the Black Rock thing a rest…
    Clearly the man was just trying to make a general point.
    He probably forgot that you come from there …
    (or perhaps that is why he used that reference…???)
    LOL
    ha ha ha


  18. @Bush Tea

    If the thesis of Grenville’s submission is to highlight justice and fairness why ensnare himself in the legalese to confuse his message?


  19. @ TheO
    To quote Ivy League fees to support fees levied in Barbados is also silly. Is Ross U delivering an Ivy League education?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Enuff is laying the foundational arguments to support their legal fees that we will soon be reading about…
    His references all come from New York, London and Singapore – and note he quotes in US currency….

    You think Enuff is ‘one smart’…?
    NO…
    He is THREE-smart…..
    …well past ‘too smart.’


  20. @ David
    If the thesis of Grenville’s submission is to highlight justice and fairness why ensnare himself in the legalese to confuse his message?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Answered BEFORE you asked…

    “” unfortunately (as is his wont) he mentions some shiite about our ‘laws’… to sound impressive…””


  21. @ David

    …part Jeff’s column…???!!

    Bushie in one of those moods today….
    LOL
    ha ha ha

    …and where the hell is GP….?
    Trump catch up with him at last…?


  22. @Bushie

    Then he has to accept the consequences reflected in exchanges from the BU family. As you know weak arguments – doesn’t matter where they come – are not suffered gladly here.


  23. WARU
    But there are still less and the average private medical school annual tuition in the US is US$55,000. Therefore too high based on what: your feels, the market, your membership of the intelligentsia, what? Many universities require 1st and 2nd year students to live on campus and some even require 3 and the full 4 years. The bloggers hear need to start posting more evidence-based submissions and less of the hearsay, emotive and flat out lies. #butiamayardfowl


  24. Expect the blp mobsters to cling at every straw a clear sign of a drowning man
    The questions beng address in the article are legitimate absence of not knowning all details but only relying on the sorry a.ss cow tongued media for information
    I tried to publish a link in a previuos comment which would give a better insight to Ross Housing standard pricedure for Students
    In my humble opinion the students have a right to protest and seek legal recourse if they were nit clearly informed
    Would not be surprised if some fine print clause was overlooked by parents when they signed the contract which leaves them legally binding to price and accommodation


  25. @Bush Tea

    Lexicon had no issue posting to Jeff’s column this morning 😐


  26. Is there video evidence of the students protesting other than the BT article?

  27. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    *If the word ‘LIBERTY” means ‘freedom from incarceration’….then why the hell could they not just say..
    .. No person shall be INCARCERATED save as may be….+

    @ Bush Tea, And you perceive a difference, in plain English as you call it, between INCARCERATION and deprivation of liberty? I use to hear an old Barbarianism about “tekking up fire rage”. Is this an example of such? Have you read the provision? May you provide me with an explanation as to how it could possibly mean the ability to do whatever you want?

  28. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    All we really need to do, is get Simple Simon (now with a brand new shiitehood) to translate all the stupid ‘Laws’ into standard English *…then even Maripoka will know where she stands – and what is right and wrong.
    Best of all, the damn Judges will be able to determine cases quite easily, when the Law actually SAYS what is INTENDED – instead of the lotta coded shiite. that currently exists…*
    In fact, very few cases would even GET to court – since any idiot (Lexicon included) could then see whether or not they broke the law….

    @ Bush Tea, she may start with this one-

    In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and in supercession of notification number 13/2012-Service Tax, dated 17th March 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number GSR. 211 (E), dated 17th March, 2012, the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts the taxable service of the description specified in column (2) of the Table below, from so much of the service tax leviable thereon under Section 66B of the said Act, as is in excess of the service tax calculated on a value which is equivalent to a percentage specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, of the amount charged by such service provider for providing the said taxable service, unless specified otherwise, subject to the relevant conditions specified in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said table…

    Good Luck!


  29. @ Jeff
    We can give THAT one to Donna…

    Her response….
    Flush.
    LOL
    ha ha ha

  30. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    It takes a while to reach convergence with Jeff because he consistently throws up straw men, knocks them down, and makes condescending remarks. Since I value discussion, I tolerate the games.

    @ Mr Phillips, I am sorry that you think that way. I do not intend to be condescending in matters of law, after all, I have to teach raw young minds fresh out of secondary school and some old enough to be my parents (at least years ago) in the intricacies of the subject. How is it condescending to ask you to read the entirety of a provision rather than the few lines or words that corroborate your unalterable supposition? Be advised that you will not have to “tolerate” the games, as you call it, any more on this blog. I shall not respond to any of your postings in future.


  31. @ Jeff
    Bush Tea, And you perceive a difference, in plain English as you call it, between INCARCERATION and deprivation of liberty?
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Liberty
    the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views.

    Incarceration
    the state of being confined in prison; imprisonment.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    YOU ..tell us what you perceive Jeff

  32. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    Thanks for the reminder that Jeff is not God.

    @ David, At least, I make no duchy claim!

  33. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    *YOU ..tell us what you perceive Jeff(

    Bush Tea, Words in English are not used in a vacuum. The word “liberty” when used in a sentence takes its meaning from the context in which it is used. Please read the entirety of section 13 and tell me what you honestly thin the word refers to. Incidentally you have not answered the question, If you are incarcerated, are you free from “oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life”?

  34. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    @ 9:25 am- no SUCH claim. I am hopeless at typing quickly, for one!


  35. Jeff
    Bushie will leave the law to you… you kindly leave the logic to Bushe… 🙂

    1 – If you are incarcerated, are you free from “oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life”?… NO!!
    BUT..
    You can be “NOT incarcerated”, and STILL be deprived ….via oppressive restrictions imposed by Authorities
    – such as being FORCED to live in inordinately expensive housing – when cheaper, better, and more convenient options exist.
    One is a subset of the other, but they are NOT equal.

    2 – If you are going to make BASIC English words into variables that take on different meanings – depending on circumstances that are dictated by arbitrary factors, then you may as well FLUSH the whole subjective shiite…

    Is this not at the ROOT of our current legal quagmire…?

    If you cannot call a spade a damn spade, then what can you call a whacker?


  36. “Many universities require 1st and 2nd year students to live on campus and some even require 3 and the full 4 years. ”

    For CLARITY…..name those universities.

  37. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Dean Jeff, woe to us here to miss your wondrous “straw” arguments of law. Do you want to have the responsibility (well indirectly) of possibly foisting a legally unschooled PM on this nation!

    All here with any schooling who are not drunk on bushtea recognize who “… throws up straw men, knocks them down, and makes [incomprehensible] remarks”…. thus since I too value discussion please tolerate [his] games… do beat his paltry, fallacious and often unintelligible (he will not have a lawyer in his field of candidates or such sentiment) arguments to the boundary rather than step away from his Trumpian style ad hominems…its an old, worn tactic….and has ALWAYS said more about the attacker and nada about the one attacked.

    Mr. Phillips should be well beyond that but obviously his time in the political spotlight has tweaked his supposed moral sensibilities.

    You obviously don’t have to indulge but a good game is always invigorating!

    @BushT, you love to word-duel and frankly there is none here (even wordsmith Jeff) better at argumentation than you…years ago I scribbled that you were as absolutely persuasive with ANY argument as any of the famed talents…then I likened you one top propagandist Dr. Gobbles …you have just gotten more impressively whackier (one who uses a whacker) with the years.

    Thus I dare not engage you to clarify what is legalese or difficult to comprehend between lack of liberty and incarceration when (as the Dean so painstakingly – Job like patience and deterrence really) said that EVERY English word MUST be understood in CONTEXT of its sentence or clause. YOU the avowed mathematician where theorems must ALSO be derived/defined in context would actually seek to argue that basic fact…..you go Dr. Gobbeles aka BushTea.

    BTW, to the Dean…the duchy conjured that old sound (which I never understood, actually): pass the duchy/dutchie on the left hand side ..and too of course Royal Dukes and Duchesses….so all good … all invigorating for a Sunday morn in early 2019.

  38. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    .Correction: …deterrence..should be DEFERENCE,


  39. @Dee Word

    The lyrics are not that difficult to understand.

    https://www.songfacts.com/facts/musical-youth/pass-the-dutchie


  40. @ Dribbles
    You are talking bare shiite.

    But since Jeff has convinced you that words can take on different meanings in different contexts,
    let Bushie hasten to explain that ‘shiite’ here is a good thing ….something that that you should aspire to…. OK?

    On THAT note, do you think that you can refrain from using the BU toilet for a while …?
    – or at least until you are finished ablutions…and have something constructive to say…?
    LOL
    ha ha ha

    Jeff is just too bright for his own good….
    Can’t you see that he is telling us in his gentlemanly way ..that we are f$#%<d ( In a bit of a tizzy …if we use his language)

    Why you ALWAYS want to take SIMPLE things and make them complicated?

    God gave Moses ALL his laws in TEN simple commandments …and a bunch of brass bowl shiite-hounds want to write voluminous scrolls of meaningless gobbledygook ….that takes on different meanings in different circumstances….

    Do you realize that Jesus then even SIMPLIFIED those TEN commandments into TWO basic ones….?
    What is your problem boss…?

    …and wunna surprised that our ass is grass…??!!


  41. It seems that whenever Jeff and I are in discussion, you prematurely reach a conclusion and give me advice based on that premature conclusion(Quote)

    The Bajan disease. It is cultural. Just read the contributions of the keyboard warriors and you will see most of their posts are ‘correcting’ people or trying to ‘prove’ others wrong. It says more about them than it says about the person they are trying to correct.
    I had it recently when some regular village idiot claimed that the Barbados government spent 20 per cent of public revenue on education. I asked for the evidence and David BU jumped in and published a link to the Estimates. It was very nice of him.
    The trouble is if he published this nonsense under a pseudonym no one would bat an eyelid, but as chairman of BU Inc he is abusing his position.


  42. “The questions being address in the article are legitimate absence of not knowning all details but only relying on the sorry a.ss cow tongued media for information…..”

    Hmmmmm……….

    Are you referring to the same “sorry a.ss cow tongued media” that has not….. to this day….. given us more information on the following “fiasco?”

    What morals and ethics does Jones possess, who, mere weeks after being defeated at the polls, ACCEPTS a job as Vice Chancellor of Bridgetown International University……..

    ………..an institution he would have FACILITATED and APPROVED its entry into Barbados, when he was Minister of Education, Science, Technology and Innovation?

    Don’t you agree the “optics look bad” in this situation as well? Could he have not respectfully declined BIU offer?

    Or is it safe to assume he entered in some type of agreement that he would have approved BIU “setting up shop” in Barbados, in exchange for the Vice Chancellor pick……..if by chance the DLP lost the elections?

    And look at his title as displayed in the video: Hon. Ronald D. Jones. Was Jones and BIU not aware that for him, the title “Honourable” went through the window, when he lost his seat…… and more so, when he accepted the job?

    But Jones becomes more interesting.

    On Saturday, August 25, 2018, while addressing students at the Washington University of Barbados, Jones ASSURED students the university was APPROVED by the government, BUT ITS ACCREDITATION WILL TAKE TIME.

    However, he stated that the ACCREDITATION WAS NOT THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ASPECT OF THEIR STUDIES.

    Instead, he urged the students to focus on becoming excellent health practitioners to assist with the worldwide shortage of doctors.

  43. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    👍🏿@David. I never knew what a dutchie was and over my many years and various travels to Jam et al never encountered it and actually never even thought of it again until today…I followed ur link and corrected my ignorance on that item!

    And it brought home the point about words and context…

    From your link I read that…“Pass The Kutchie,” [is] Jamaican slang for a pot that holds marijuana.” Whereas a “Dutchie” is a Jamaican cooking pot”

    Two things. 1.If any Bajan tells you “pass da kutchie,do” would you not clear out quickly for fear of sexual assault. I certainly dont know kutchie which can also be pronouced as *couchee/couchie” as having ANYTHING to do with marijuna!

    2.There was an original song called “Pass The Kutchie” but the producers of the new song thought “Pass the dutchie [was]…an acceptable substitute for the original lyric”.

    I would hazard a guess that whereas most Jamaicans may have known the tampi link that most others would have perceived the other interpretation and NEITHER would have been approved by the local radio communications boards.

    CONTEXT and MEANING!


  44. Gosh Ha, Ha…what did that white dude at the newspaper do to you??

    we heard he was a nasty piece of work..but you are totally traumatized and that would be many years after you left his cave.


  45. @Jeff
    Even though the use of one or two legal words seem to scramble my brain, I have always enjoyed your participation on the blog and your responses to questions posed by other bloggers.. I believe that you bring light, logic and common sense to our discussion. I can appreciate how you feel when others characterize your words and action in a negative way.

    Not that it matters, but I fully support your decision to ignore any questions posed to you (by the man himself). It is one thing to be ‘invited to a party’ and always finding yourself in an exchange with the host.

    At the same time be careful of those who use phrases like “Already Jeff is shredding the legal/constitutional elements of the writer’s thesis.”. They are not your friends and will twist your words to discredit any other ‘political party’ . The day you make a mistake that is not in their favor, they will jump on you even faster and harder than they jump on GP.

    Is it too late to say “Happy New Year”? Don’t reply or say yes, because I might just try to sneak in “Belated Merry Xmas.’

    Have a great day.

    TheoG

  46. The Truth Shall Set You Free Avatar
    The Truth Shall Set You Free

    @ Hal Austin

    The Bajan disease. It is cultural. Just read the contributions of the keyboard warriors and you will see most of their posts are ‘correcting’ people or trying to ‘prove’ others wrong. It says more about them than it says about the person they are trying to correct. {Quote}

    You are truly an amazing character.

    Cultural traits are inherited. No matter how long your were living in the UK, you are a Barbadian, and being Barbadian, you would have inherited this cultural Bajan disease from your parents. Which means your ancestors, parents, siblings, relatives and you, would have also displayed symptoms of this disease during your life time.

    Despite you wanting to come off as the most intelligent man to post on BU, I have noticed that you often try to correct other posters and try to prove them wrong as well. Only difference is, you do so by also saying they are silly, semi-literate, appallingly ignorant or they learn by rote, which makes you a keyboard warrior too.

    What does this say about you?

  47. The Truth Shall Set You Free Avatar
    The Truth Shall Set You Free

    @ Hal Austin

    I had it recently when some regular village idiot claimed that the Barbados government spent 20 per cent of public revenue on education. I asked for the evidence and David BU jumped in and published a link to the Estimates. {Quote}

    Proves your point, exactly.

  48. Sir Simple Simon, P.C. Avatar
    Sir Simple Simon, P.C.

    @Bush Tea January 5, 2019 11:20 PM “All we really need to do, is get Simple Simon (now with a brand new shiitehood) to translate all the stupid ‘Laws’ into standard English.”

    Willing to do it as long as wunnna willing to pay me.

    Sir Simple Simon, P.C. (People’s Counsel)


  49. @GP
    I am still on board the SB train.

    Each post should teach you something.

    Notice how the fair and balanced Artax seized on a “Black Rock” phrase and made it his signature issue for this post,

    Be careful when you give praise to the party in power for they will use it in their 2023 campaign.

    Be careful how you speak of different villages/parishes/seats in the island of Barbados. In 2023, we will have the archivist trying to hang you with what you said about any section of Barbados.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading