Barbados Today Online newspaper was today [30.10.2017] ordered by the Barbados Court to pay Leader of the Opposition an undisclosed settlement resulting from an article it posted that questioned her qualification to practice law in Barbados.
Barbados Today Online Newspaper Ordered to PAY Mia Mottley
Discover more from Barbados Underground
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
307 responses to “Barbados Today Online Newspaper Ordered to PAY Mia Mottley”
-
Simple Simon November 1, 2017 at 6:53 PM #
Even the essays and theses are matters of public record. They must be placed in the college library. Senior theses (MAs and PhDs) are available globally.
-
Bush Tea November 1, 2017 at 6:52 PM “Did they even HAVE transcripts back in your days…? Written on what…? stone?
Actually yes. Written on stone by the finger of your Big Boss Engineer (BBE)
-
Fractured Blp dunce,the game is up why don,t yousee reality your supposed ace in the hole gone up in flames.As they would say Next,you looking for the Canoaun Tapes bring them and come but remember Ms Nottley alone have issues they are plenty skeletons in the DLp closet just remember when you throw one stone two coming back at you.I really do hope that Ms Mottley finds out who you are and throws a lawsuit in you.As mara Thompson ad vised you really need to take yourself out of the gutter and come with policies to help Bajans struggling to pay bills and put food on their table.You shold be ashamed of yourself.to even show your face back on BU.
-
Now they done gone and lose poor old Gazer
I thought that LEC dog couldn’t hunt; that it was dead
But that damn dog still running around the place
Poor Gazer is confused…
Is the dog dead?
Do we have a rubber teeth ghost dog on the prowl? -
@Simple
You are somewhat older than I thought you were.
Here I was thinking sheepskin and you are telling me stone….. -
Dont know why it is even this Mia degree a topic anymore, no judge with integrity will give a defamation judgement unless she saw irrefutable proof of a law degree.
The lawyers I wont trust, especially that conflict of interest jackass Leslie Haynes, but I dont see Justice Richards not knowing what a law degree looks like or giving a judgement based on no evidence..
-
Well well
Your posting at 4:22 AM speaks volumes.
At least here again , you have demonstrated that you have a conscience
This MAM being ” legally qualified to practise Law ” still bothering you
You won’t have much longer to wait ……..to see the mystery of it all unravel
PM Stuart has promised to EXPLAIN……MAM
He will keep his word as the evidence to do it is already in hand & head
Be calm……I am a lawyer
It will prove to be the most telling campaign slogan…. ever !!!!
-
Concocted story full of lies and propaganda . Shame on you David BU.to put out false news. BU has once proven itself to be a bold faced propaganda tool of the blp
-
So………. you prefer BU “to be a bold faced propaganda tool of the DLP?”
If, in your opinion, “BU has proven itself to be a bold faced propaganda tool of the BLP,” why do you continue to:
………. log on to the site?
………. use the forum to defend the DLP and spread DLP propaganda?
……….respond to contributions?
And seeing that despite your political rhetoric over the years, you have been unable to convince contributors to drink “DLP kool-aid,” don’t you think it’s best for you to LEAVE this forum PERMANENTLY………..
…………… rather than making yourself appear silly (as you usually do) by continuing logging on to BU and complaining?
#yardfowljackasspoliticalpimp
-
Fractured and Pissed….yes I have a conscience and believe in looking at the facts as they present themselves and not other people’s fantasies.
Why dont yall focus more instead on what Mia, Leslie Haynes, her relatives the Mottleys and Simmons pulled off at the Supreme Court right befire yall eyes instead ……..with their fellow corrupt criminal partner Peter Kutappa-Harris….
…… why dont Fruendel enact and enforce the anti-corription legislation and lock them all up.
That would play wonderfully with the already pissed off electorate.
-
See how focusing on a damn LEC made yall miss the play….they pulled off a devious scam in the supreme court in front everyone’s eyes, but yall still focused on some stupid ass LEC and missed the whole thing…..
…..cause yall are the ones helped them pull it off when ya went on and on about an LEC for 2 years…
Blasted idiots….I could not stop laughing yesterday when I heard the whole story.
-
Maybe enough to convince the electorate to reject the blp propaganda in two elections
If the blp continue on a path distortion of frenzy to attract the voters there will be similar rejections at the voting booth by the electorate in 2018
Would be looking for more false news from the blp operatives in order to dumb down the voter intellect .
The voter would see through all the shenanigans.
This election would boil down to truthfulness and integrity and history has a way of sorting fact from fiction
The blp has now engaged in fiction to protect Mia character in what has become a war of words to find the truthfulness of the LEC story shrouded in doubt suspicion and even corruption.
This story is not going away not even by a long shot. -
Good luck…..yall lost already.
-
I am noticing a number of misleading and untrue comments on this site that want to suggest that it is not necessary or important for Mottley to hold a Practicing Certificate from the UK if she is not planning on living and working there. This rubbish and is incorrect.
This position is utter nonsense if one were to read and to understand what was written from the Bar Council in London you will see the messages very clearly says THAT SHE HAS NEVER HELD A PRACTICING CERTIFICATE AND SHE NEVER WAS A REGISTERED BARRISTER , let me clear up some of the untruths I have read in some of these post, Mottley needed to gain A PRACTICING CERTIFICATE in the UK having not done an LEC in the Caribbean the requirement of holding A PRACTICING CERTIFICATE from the UK is not a matter of if she wants to have a PRACTICING CERTIFICATE from the UK or not it has nothing to do with merely Practicing in the UK A PRACTICING CERTIFICATE from the UK is the only official means of proving that the Lawyer is indeed qualified and able to legally represent people and practice law as a profession it is not an optional as to if you want to have it or not have it it is the UK’s means of saying that the person is indeed properly qualified to practice law.
So please be clear that Mottley either needs to be the holder of a Practicing Certificate from the UK or and Legal Education Certificate from the University of the West Indies to be considered a truly qualified Lawyer and the Barbadian Public have been waiting over 2 years to have her put this matter to bed by producing the evidence that she did somehow qualify and to show she is within the law and legally can call herself an Attorney at Law. We continue to see her qualification letters. -
Even in Australia The distinction in Australia is generally between those who have successfully completed law degrees (an LLB) and those who have then gone on to do the necessary practical exams and work experience to be admitted as barristers or solicitors of the appropriate state Supreme Court. The latter are generically “lawyers”. The former merely have law degrees.
How do I become a solicitor in the UK?
To be a lawyer in the UK, you could become a general solicitor, who advises on legal issues, or a fully qualitfied barrister, who represents people in a courtroom. It is possible to become a solicitor without a law degree but most students qualify by the law graduate route:
Obtain a three-year undergraduate degree in law (LLB) in the UK or an undergraduate degree in any other subject followed by a legal conversion course.
Take the one-year Legal Practice Course (LPC)
Gain practice-based training (training contract) incorporating the Professional Skills Course – two years full-time
Admission to the roll of solicitors.How do I qualify as a barrister in the UK?
Unlike solicitors, barristers are able to provide specialist legal representation in a court, There are four main steps to becoming a barrister in the UK:
Obtain a three-year undergraduate degree in law (LLB) in the UK or an undergraduate degree in any other subject followed by a legal conversion course.
Take the one-year Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC).
Pupillage – spend one year as a pupil in barristers’ chambers or in another organisation approved by the Bar Standards Board as a Pupillage Training Organisation (PTO).
Obtain tenancy in a barristers’ chambers or go into practice as an employed barrister. -
Instead of getting rid of the real threats to the island, they allow those threats to grow…….
Fruendel don’t want to legislate real anti corruption laws and enforce them, they only want to talk about an LEC, they dont want to lock up their fellow corrupt politicians, lock up retired corrupt chief justice, lock up corrupt, dangerious criminal CGI Insurance owner……
……..all they want to talk about is an LEC…and believe the electorate is so stupid, they will actually take them seriously. …Ha!!!!
-
Likewise, “if the DLP continues on a path distortion of frenzy to attract the voters there will be similar rejections at the voting booth by the electorate in 2018.”
And since they cannot get over their lost on the LEC issue, I “would be looking for more false news from the DLP operatives in order to dumb down the voter intellect,” as demonstrated by their “Naked Departure” postings. “The voters will (definitely) see through all the shenanigans.”
But wunnuh en see dat de onliest people dat noticing wunnuh is wunnuh yard-fowls?
And that is why the members and yard-fowl operatives of the DLP prefer to speak in DLP dominated forums, where the “fake news” will be accepted…….. no questions asked…….. by gullible yard-fowls.
Remember George Pilgrim predicting that Mottley would have been ousted during the BLP’s 2016 annual conference……….
…………or his mentioning the BEES “renting a crowd” to participate in the March of Disgust,” and when pressed to substantiate the claim, Pilgrim responded: “The supermarkets were bursting on Friday.”
And how could you mention corruption but ignore the fact that Michael Lashley, as minister of transport, could out source bus repairs to Trans Tech Inc., and “lease” a X5 BMW SUV from that establishment, perhaps believing Barbadians are stupid enough not to “connect the dots” re conflict of interest?
“Fake news” is trying to convince us that corruption is synonymous with the BLP, when Barbadians know for sure that members of BOTH the BLP & DLP are corrupt.
-
@ Retired Attorney at Law Stay Calm I am a Lawyer November 2, 2017 at 7:56 AM
As a self-acclaimed legal eagle with a lifetime of experience under your practicing belt why not advise the ‘relevant’ authorities to revoke MAM’s licence until she is able to ‘unquestionably’ prove she is duly fit and qualified to practice law in Barbados?
That should put a stop to this tirade of ‘utter’ nonsense compounded by your ‘inane’ intervention.
Why don’t you ask the learned chief legal adviser to the State to honour his commitment of investigating the matter he made over two years?
Remember the maxim: “Justice delayed is justice denied”.
And we don’t want to have that done to the piggy-in-the-middle called the “Barbadian Public” aka the electorate, do we now, Bajan Lord Denning of Whitepark? -
It’s all about deceiving the electorate is the mission of yardfowls, nothing more, nothing less.
-
Retired Attorney at Law Stay Calm I am a Lawyer November 2, 2017 at 7:56 AM #
“This position is utter nonsense if one were to read and to understand what was written from the Bar Council in London you will see the messages very clearly says THAT SHE HAS NEVER HELD A PRACTICING CERTIFICATE AND SHE NEVER WAS A REGISTERED BARRISTER….”
@ Retired Attorney at Law Stay Calm I am a Lawyer
How do you know the above statement is true………… unless you’re the individual that posted the information to Naked Departure.
Are you suggesting that Mottley circumvented the admission process because the government, Registrar of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice and Attorney General, at the time, did not perform a process of due diligence?
-
Deception. The another piece of the LEC puzzle.
-
@ angela Skeete November 2, 2017 at 8:46 AM
Yes, another word for the “D” in DLP.
Maybe MAM ought to take the oath of DLP deception:
‘We shall lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those who do like Greenverbs.’ -
Imagine the blp running a false story through. different sources of media oultets. Now to tell the truth if such actions does not give an intention to be deliberate in actions of deception. Then the word deception should take on a whole new meaning when applied to political tricks
Just to show how credibity plays a big part in character one would have thought that Mam would have spoken out against should politricks especially after stating that her leadership would be founded on integrity
Would some one please explain ? -
Artax
Retire Lieyuh can’t even lie good. So if an LEC or Practising Certificate is needed, why must ALL lawyers in Barbados apply every year to the Registrar for a Practising Certificate?
-
@ Retired Attorney at Law Stay Calm I am a Lawyer
I am not amused with your questionable line of argument. Firstly, if Mia wasn’t qualified to be a lawyer, why would Errol Barrow and Henry Forde introduce her to the bar in England? Don’t you feel that for acceptance she would have presented her qualifications prior to her introduction?
Back in Barbados, she was presented to the Bar by two eminent QC’s and has been a successful lawyer in Barbados and other Caribbean countries who recognized her legal ability. I must ask….Is this LEC qualification so detrimental in making a person a better lawyer? If you feel Mia is not qualified, yet her legal attributes surpasses others……..then I feel it is a waste. Ask these successful businessmen if they attended University – Steve Jobs or Sir Richard Branson.
In Barbados. We had outstanding grassroot politicians who never attended University, but have been successful political speakers that destroyed all those who show off degrees. People like Eric Sealy, Hamilton Lashley, Mencea Cox
It is about time that this nonsense be put to rest.
BTW; should the word ‘Retired” remove from this moniker since we know who spoke those words, to whom and what occasion. -
Once again were you to have read and understood the post the same Mottley and the matter of her paperwork was never referred to the then AG if we’re to read and understand what you read you would have noted from Sir Henry remarks in the Nation that the paperwork was looked over by the Then Chief Justice and the Registrar of the wife of David Simmons at the time and he continued on to say that had either one of them found a problem it would have been referred to the AG it was never referred to the AG so once again you are lying to suggest the then AG opened it for her to commit fraud.
Your concocted version is simply another lie of the BLP -
Too much damn incestous nepotism practiced for the last 50 years, that is why this matter can never be put to rest…
……”then chief justice and the registrar, the wife of David Simmons” = Mia’s cousin and his wife Marie McCormack.
The nastiness will always retùrn to haunt whether genuine documentation or not.
Put the LEC to rest, focus on the corruption of both useless political parties and the criminals in the business community who owns and controls them instead, that is the root of all the island’s problems, stop trying to distract and deceive the electorate with nonsense about an irrelevant LEC..
-
In most places, the fact that one of the parties received a check would kill the old talk.
But in the land of just talk, they go on and on and on and on… -
LOL A Bowl of Concoction
-
Barbados with 20 downgrades and counting…..a government that’s spending what it’s not earning…now 45% above its earning capacity,…..a government that is borrowing the citizens’ pension funds to pay current account expenses,…..a government that’s lying to the its citizens every day……a government that’s the worse government since 1937,…a government in which no one has reposed an iota of confidence…..a government that includes a JA called Kellman whom David Ellis embarrassed and insulted with the truth on Brasstacks on Monday,…a government which head has been found short on truth in the Cahill scam…..and do much more that affects the citizens of this country…..and all George Pilgrim and the Dems can find as a talking point is a piece of paper called an LEC……call elections you scumbags…brassballs!
-
There could therefore have been no “winning” of any lawsuit as suggested in your article. There was no determination and/or adjudication upon any of the issues before the law court on that day or at all. There was no determination of any matter whether procedural or substantive. The parties themselves agreed on the manner of disposing of the court actions.
http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/letters_to_editor/101796/winners-losers
-
No Winners or Losers.
In relation to the article appearing at Page 5 of the DAILY NATION of October 31, 2017 [headlined Money For Mia After Lawsuit], I, together with Mr Brian Barrow, appeared in matters CV 1218 of 2017 and 1218A of 2017 wherein Ms Mia Mottley, being the claimant in each proceeding, claimed against the Barbados Today that she had been defamed.
We filed defences in each action on behalf of Barbados Today.
At the hearing, which occurred on October 30, there were no arguments before the court. A consent order was agreed between the parties and the court actions were both withdrawn.
There could therefore have been no “winning” of any lawsuit as suggested in your article. There was no determination and/or adjudication upon any of the issues before the law court on that day or at all. There was no determination of any matter whether procedural or substantive. The parties themselves agreed on the manner of disposing of the court actions.
The claim that there was a successful argument before the court completely misrepresents what occurred and is a disservice to the parties involved.
We are officers of the court and our first duty is to the court and its process. It is therefore appropriate and obligatory that we make a statement by way of clarification on behalf of the court and all counsel who appeared so that the public may not be misled.C. ANTHONY AUDAIN, attorney at law
-
http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/letters_to_editor/101796/winners-losers
Hants
Are you still willing to tout that Mia Mottley is eminently qualified to practise Law in Barbados 🇧🇧 without being:
• Registered to practise Law in England and Wales where she studied ?
• Without possesing a LEC to practise Law in Barbados 🇧🇧 and the Caribbean ?
• Why MAM and her legal team did not allow the Court case on October 30, 2017 to reach the Judge 👩⚖️ Madam Justice Richards ?
• Did you realise that Barbados Today Attorneys – filed a defense ?
• How much longer is MAM going to run away from this SCANDAL ?????
Hants….,,..,,,??????
-
Owen Arthur knew something when he uttered these immortal words……” The BLP under Mia Amor Mottley has LOST its SOUL! “
-
Fractured BLP October 31, 2017 at 9:19 AM #
Well I am very heartened by the glee of the BLP supporters on this blog for Mia Mottley in her ” victory over the Barbados Today ”
The best response on this thread so far is Jeff Cumberbatch comments on October 30, 2017 @ 8:30 PM
Well well comments at 8:32 PM on the said date & thread…….essentially shows that he smells a RAT with this issue.
The simple facts of this matter so far is that MAM in her guilt fell for the bait set by Barbados Today.
Here are the questions that must be answered still on this matter :
• Why does MAM – up today – remains unregistered to practice law in England and Wales after studying over there for her ” Law Degree ” ???
• It is well know now that she does not have a LEC to practise in the Caribbean either , isn’t this true ???
Therefore , did she complete her Law Degree in England ??
Does she possess a double major degree – that is Law with another subject matter ?
So this matter ain’t going away at ALL !!!MAM was the student in all of this – she has to declare what she studied and what success she reaped ???
So again I repeat it is going to be a ……..Long Exceptionally Cold (LEC) …….winter season.
Stay tuned !!!!!
Like
I , Fractured BLP , posted the above on October 31, 2017 long before Anthony Audain – Attorney at Law penned his now famous EXPOSE in the Weekend Nation of Friday 4 November, 2017.
My post of October 31, 2017 ………,was in response to a wild 😜 😜😜😜😜😜clamour from a ” Motley Crew ” of persons in the FORM of :
• Artax. • Miller •. Well well • Gabriel . • Enuff. • Prodigirl. ..,,,,,and the BEAT goes on !!!!!!
Just in case the abovementioned members of the Motley Crew ” FORGOT ” what I am talking bout ……please………refresh your memories on the link below :
http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/letters_to_editor/101796/winners-losers
-
http://m.sknvibes.com/news/newsdetails.cfm/10892
The above link is not only for the benefit of the ” Motley Crew ” including my Esteemed fellow blogger HANTS !!!
But an article for ALL …….,.rational thinking Barbadians
Questions:
• Does MAM performance this Court makes you proud of her legal skills ?????
• Does she exhibit sound knowledge of what constitutes an ” Expert Witness ” having……herself…… signed an Affadavit , to wit ?????
• Does she exhibit the legal skill of an Attorney at Law with a Legal Education Certificate (LEC)
???• And finally , why in the above referenced case , did she ” readily agree ” (WITHOUT QUESTION ???) with Lawyer Astaphan ……,that her client was NOT an Expert Witness ??
• Was MAM’s …… No Question ploy…….a direct TACTIC to evade any questions about her legal qualifications ???
Get to work on this ……,on going SAGA………you Motley Crew !!!!
Barbados 🇧🇧…,,,,,deserves better !!!!!!
Again , I repeat …..,,,it will be a ……,Long Exceptionally Cold (LEC) ……Winter 🌊 season !!!!!
-
It is tradition that an attorney involved in a case which came before the courts does not then speak out in public on the case and its outcomes. Is there a case for a formal complaint?
-
Fractured BLP November 2, 2017 at 5:39 AM #
It will prove to be the most telling campaign slogan…. ever !!!!Twit. We the electorate do not want slogans. We want Barbados’s reserves to be at decent levels. We want jobs. We want to not be taxed to the hilt. We want to know that corruption is not rife. We want alleged involvement of certain persons with people of dubious character investigated. We want the roads fixed properly, not patched which wash way with a lil rain.
Fool.
-
Retired…if this was an extortion using the supreme court as a prop…it is a crime, why is the “victim” not reporting the matter to the police, I was shocked to hear how it was engineered, not shocked at all though that it was Simmons accused of doing the engineering……..
I saw Karma playing her role that Harris is now crying “victim” of an extortion while still misusing and abusing the same supreme court to victimize and refuse to pay injured claimants of CGI Insurance and Transport Board.
-
When criminals and thieves who pretend to be respectable in the society fall out, it’s never pretty.
Ya can only pretend for so long.
-
Ha, Ha….when ya get to that part in ya law degree that states….
“We are officers of the court and our first duty is to the court and its process. It is therefore appropriate and obligatory that we make a statement by way of clarification on behalf of the court and all counsel who appeared so that the public may not be misled.”
Then ya can talk….dont know why you love to enable and condine corruption against bajans, have to talk to the Home Office about you.
So why should there be a formal complaint against Audain, who as an officer of the court is well within his rights to NOT mislead the public. …as is obviously being done at this time.
Trust you to pick on the petty and irrelevant.
The issue here is an ongoing accusation that the supreme court was abused by those same criminals who have been abusing it for decades, to perpetrate the alledged shakedown and exoirtion of a fellow criminal, who himself perpetrates shakedowns, blackmail, extortion and all types of serious crimes to have his own way in Barbados…..
………apparently this “extortion”……which was successful was to thief election campaign financing from the criminal fir the upcoming election…..and was engineeered by the former chief justice who taught and trained the criminal how to misuse and abuse the same supreme court in the first place.
If ya believe the ongoing saga to be playing out accurately in that form, the criminal is pissed that the other corrupt criminals who not only trained and enabled him, but got the better of him and he gotta pay….well if he don’t pay….that’s another story for another time.
As someone said couple days ago, when ya own dog bites ya….ya are well and truly bitten…lol
Bushman and Art….this is not going away….temperatures are rising…lol
-
More reasons for scorning David Simmons.
The revelations surrounding David Simmons’ involvement in the Mia Mottley / Barbados Today matter serves to revisit the reasons why David Thompson and Freundel Stuart did not sanction his extension in the post of Chief Justice. David Thompson flatly said no to his request for an extension, informing him that he never supported his appointment in the first place and so he could not support an extension of an appointment that was wrong.
It is now abundantly clear that the man remained at the heart of BLP Politics and was unfit for the post of Chief Justice. Arthur made a grave mistake in appointing this person.
In case Simmons does not know it is really low for a man of his standing to be involved in gutter type wheeling and dealing to try to make Mottley his cousin and the BLP look good. Thompson saw the real man who was nothing but a snake in the grass.
All that is left now for him to do is to return to the platform of the BLP. But because he would like to continue to fool unsuspecting Barbadians that he is Mr Integrity, that would hardly happen.
Simmons is nothing but an ordinary political lackey who must be condemned for his political dirt work.
We hope that the money he extorted for the Mottley / Barbados Today deal goes to a good use.
-
Fractured and Misled….ya still missing the point, as I have said from day 1….the “lawsuit”….is a sham, a scam,more abuse of the supreme court, now it is even being labeled an attempted extortion, by one group of criminals against another criminal……cause I doubt their fellow criminal intends to pay out any money if he cant control a BLP government…
Deal with the issues of corruption….the LEC is irrelevant….as long as the ATTORNEY GENERAL refuses to pursue an investigation as to whether a law degree in Mia’s name actually exists…so I refuse to get drawn in to ya LEC, law degree argument until the attorney general does his job.
Now re the corruption of all the criminals of that lawsuit scam….will Adriel AG direct the DPP (ag) to use Fruendel’s 90 year old corruption laws and investigate whether they should be applied to Mia et al, once barbadostoday wins a defense…….and makes a complaint to the police for extortion….
That is what I want to know….so ya can stop wuth the LEC crap…not interested.
-
cause I doubt their fellow criminal, and now self proclaimed “victim” intends to pay out any money if he cant control a BLP government…
Lol, lol, haha haha. ..lol
-
Hal Austin
Please take your time and re read CAREFULLY what Mr. Audain said !
MAM and her other legal bandits did not allow the matter to go before the Judge 👩⚖️ !
“At the hearing, which occurred on October 30, there were no arguments before the court. A consent order was agreed between the parties and the court actions were both withdrawn.
There could therefore have been no “winning” of any lawsuit as suggested in your article. There was no determination and/or adjudication upon any of the issues before the law court on that day or at all. There was no determination of any matter whether procedural or substantive. The parties themselves agreed on the manner of disposing of the court actions. ” An excerpt from Mr. C. Anthony Audain’s response in the Weekend Nation of November 3, 2017 -
Well well
The LEC is pivotal to this matter.
Get your hands on this document :
Statutory Instrument ( S. I ) 1985 No. 23. – The Legal Education Council – Act
It was signed by Mr. Louis Tull as Minister of Legal Affairs in December 1984
Then we can examine this matter further.
Get cracking on this case Well well …….a.k.a Perry Mason – a qualified lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂😂😎
-
Well well
While you are making your rounds to do your investigations
Check up on the following:
• The Judge responsible for the Maria Agard v BLP case , still sitting on the Bench ????
• Does own any residual allegiance to his former boss – former Chief Justice Sir David Simmons ??
• Don’t you agree that this Agard matter taking exceedingly long on the altar of Court ” backlogs ” ?????
-
Does he owe any residual allegiance……
-
Strange Enuff , Miller Prodigirl & Artax have not yet pounced on Mr. C. Anthony Audain’s ……..earth shattering… ??
Oops 🙊, I forgot there are all off to Canuoan to ‘ destroy ‘ tapes !!!!
That I must ADMIT……have already been taken and processed by Law enforcement along with the wire tapping ones !!
Oh what a tangled BLP mess !!!
No wonder George Payne was doing bad on the stage with Peter Ram at the BLP conference last weekend !!!!
-
Earth 🌏 shattering revelations….
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.