Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur
Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur

To standing room only former Prime Minister Owen Arthur delivered a speech to an appreciative audience at the Errol Barrow Centre for Creative Imagination last evening. Since demitting office Arthur has said very little regarding the current state of the economy and related matters. Thanks to the economic society at UWI, Cave Hill which is comprised of campus students, Barbadians got to hear Arthur’s views on the most topical issue of the day; the economy.

For nearly two hours former Prime Minister Arthur systematically attacked the government’s policies. He labelled the economic strategy of the government as one prescribed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and suggested there is no precedent in world history for austerity measures leading to prosperity. He was very uncharitable towards Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance by suggesting the government has resorted to managing the economy based on indices and ratios.

Of concern to Arthur was what he discerned to be a lack of government policies which are transformational. He reminded the audience that under WTO rules several incentives currently used to attract business to Barbados will be dismantled. Also the double taxation treaty with Canada which has seen the exclusivity it gave to Barbados becoming the country with the third largest concentration of Canadian assets will become fair game when the economic partnership agreement with Canada in the pipeline is rolled out. Lastly the 50% exports which Barbados currently enjoys with the region will come under threat in 2015 when under the economic partnership rules the common external tariffs currently in position will have to be removed.

As a way forward he identified the need to leverage the uniqueness of the Bajan Brand to lead Barbados from the economic morasses it now finds itself.  He called for proud Barbadians to rise up and show the entrepreneurial drive which is required to build a home grown solution to our problem. He disagreed with the suggestion of a wage freeze and instead called for an incomes policy which is designed to reward effort. Of interest was his support to continue our tertiary level education and to resist cuts, a contrast to the call from Professor Avinash Persaud’s recent call to cut tertiary spending. He was highly critical of the government’s guarantee of the Four Season’s debt which he said adds negatively to Barbados’ debt profile.

Arthur after a two and a half year lay-off delivered his speech with confidence, during the Q&As he was at his most ruthless when responding to a question from Nation journalist Wade Gibbons. It was interesting to observe the lukewarm interplay between Arthur and Mottley when the night’s event was concluded. If one is to judge from the standing ovations by the BLPites in attendance, it is obvious Arthur still commands support within the party.

BU has received Arthur’s speech with the compliments of Sylvan Greenidge.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

179 responses to “Owen Arthur Says Current Policies Of Government Will Lead To Domestic Recession”


  1. He is not blameless for theposition as it exist now had he not played a part in the calculated and determined approach to filter away millions of Bds dollars to personal accounts we would have had a lot more in reserve.

    His corruption was nothing short of being absolutely bold faced, nearly a billion dollars in cost overruns, the wastage of $ 24 Million to rent a cruise liner for CWC and his demand to be paid by a West Coast developer $ 1 million dollars payable to the bagman for his Town and Country Planning permission to build a property to raise revenue for this island.

    Owing has openly said that he is going to take down Mottley and so he continues his trek to do so tonight.

    He has some gumption to give the gov’t instructions on anything even lesser so on finance as he oversaw the worst run govt in the history of Barbados complete with massive( starting at him ) corruption and mismanagement of public funds you will ever be asked to endure.


  2. Hello WIV, Are you in disagreement with any of these six points.

    1: He labeled the economic strategy of the government as one prescribed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

    2: WTO rules several incentives currently used to attract business to Barbados will be dismantled.

    3: The double taxation treaty with Canada which has seen the exclusivity it gave to Barbados becoming the country with the third largest concentration of Canadian assets will become fair game when the economic partnership agreement with Canada in the pipeline is rolled out.

    4: The 50% exports which Barbados currently enjoys with the region will come under threat in 2015 when under the economic partnership rules the common external tariffs currently in position will have to be removed.

    5: As a way forward he identified the need to leverage the uniqueness of the Bajan Brand to lead Barbados from the economic morasses it now finds itself.

    6: He was highly critical of the government’s guarantee of the Four Season’s debt which he said adds negatively to Barbados’ debt profile.


  3. The pure economic genius Owing After resurrected.

    Wanna Bajans tell bare lies pun de man.

    Veco,Dodds,Kensington Oval,3S Danos,
    Cost overruns, $75,000 cheque. Almost a Billion dollars in debt? Neva happen.

    Wanna tell bare lies pun Owing.
    Now he coming back to show dat he is de true massta of de BLP.

    Oh Wen be going ah gen?


  4. Owing is simply trying to redeem himself, the Four Seasons project has value to Barbados and it is sensible and right to make sure it progresses well and if the gov’t has to support it to that position all power to them after all your former gov’t refurbished the Oval at a price tag of in excess of $ 350 million built a Hilton at a runaway cost so if the gov’t invest in a project that creates work for Barbadians it will come no where near or as costly as you escapades in corrupt acts.


  5. We have grown accustomed to the dire predictions of Muttley and company this is typical doom and gloom styled politics of the most corrupt bunch to lead this island, remember I wrote on here about the trickle down effect of Owing’s and Muttley’s type of corruption and I wrote before elections that one Leo Brewster and his girlfriend were responsible for in excess of $ 1,5 million in fraud and we are now seeing it come to past the feeling within the former administration was if Owing can steal so can I, so the cycle has been finally broken and the likes of Owing and Muttley can’t handle it.


  6. Has anyone else noticed a clear case of desperation with WIV?


  7. Greenidge not flustered not desperate about about a ting just amused by Owing pretending to be the only person with an answer, sad really it is sad.


  8. Shut em Down
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    What I use in the battle for the mind
    I hit it hard
    Like it supposed
    Pullin’ no blows to the nose
    Like uncle L said I’m rippin’ up shows

  9. mash up & buy back Avatar
    mash up & buy back

    KIKI

    Please stop taking over the blog with these nonsense posts.

    It would be nice if you can speak directly to the top at hand.

    I am getting tired having to scroll past your numerous posts which says very little if anything at all on point.


  10. Arthur like many continue to ask the big question. How does the government plan to address the budget deficit. The easy answer answer is to cut public sector spending or increase taxes.

    The downside is if government reduces spending it has the effect of soaking money out of the economy because Barbados is a public sector led economy.
    The downside if the government increases taxes it holds the danger of narrowing the tax base.

    How does Prime Minister Thompson plan to manage the deficit. According to Arthur the debt as a % of GDP now stands at 8+% well over the less than 2% when the BLP demitted office.


  11. I really should wait for the full text of the speech…..
    But I am a happy man. Not ecstatic, just happy; two for one is not bad.
    I am a Barbadian, and I am aware of the issues facing our country. I wanted to hear Owen more so for what he would do or what needs to be done to put Barbados back on the right path. Only the fifth point listed by Marlhole gives us an idea of his solutions. chupse.
    It was more of a political speech, which I am not against, because equal to my wanting Barbados to prosper, I do not want to see a PM Mia Mottley, anybody but she. lol!


  12. @David:
    The IMF opinions on what the Barbados government policy should be is seen throughout the Arthur reign. Only on selected issues did Arthur tell the IMF no, same with Thompson.

    That once great political scoring point (IMF running Bimshire) is useless in today’s information world. It is easy from me to read succesive IMF consultations and look and Government policy with an eye to were they coalesce and differ.

  13. Trained Economist Avatar
    Trained Economist

    Questions for Arthur:

    1. Why would a counter cylical program not lead to significant foreign exchange leakage given that 78 cents of every dollar spent in BIm is on imported goods? Why would this policy prescription not put the fixed exchange rate at risk?

    2. Is it not correct that if the fiscal deficit was being measured properly his claim of a 2% deficit is wildly inaccurate. Has arthur looked at the latest IMF article 4 consultation? document http://imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2009/cr09291.pdf.

    If you look at page 16 of this document is it not fair to say that the Arthur administration engaged in practices similar to Greece in hiding the true level of government debt and the fiscal deficit. The IMF reports the nonfinancial fiscal deficit as -6.9% in 2005, -5.3% in 2006, -8% in 2007, -7.6% in 2008 and -8.4% in 2009. Where is arthur’s 2%? It is 2% if counted the way he chose to.

    3. Would a counter cyclical policy at this time not mean significantly more borrowing? How much more debt does he feel we can handle given that independent international assessors put our debt at 123% of gdp?

    4. Would a counter cyclical approach not mean abandoning the investment grade credit rating? is arthur recommending this?


  14. @Trained Economist

    Question for you.

    How do you respond to Arthur’s scoff directed at Thompson when he expressed that the 200 million loan payment due this year will place Barbados reserves under pressure. Arthur was adamant his administration created a sinking fund to match the loan maturity.


  15. @David:
    It is unfortunate that this blog has been started without access to Arthurs exact words.

    @ Trained Economist:
    Your questions 3 and 4 needs to be answered by Arthur .

    The Nationnews reported him to have said …

    The former Prime Minister and Minister of Finance noted that policies intended to correct fiscal problems could easily, and inadvertently lead to more vulnerabilities like a deeper recession and rising unemployment. “The trade-offs, therefore, have to be carefully measured and calibrated to ensure they lead to the harmonisation,” Arthur said.

    Sorry so far this seems to be more politics than serious discussion about the Barbados economy.


  16. Off topic
    Mash Up & Buy Back did you attend the immigration meeting last night in St Philip?If not from very reliable reports Gilbert Greaves ,Arni Walters & the chief immigration officer finally indicated by their responses that this government is not serious about implementing any meaningful immigration policy.

    I was made to understand that criminologist Yolande Forde and many more at that meeting asked some very potent questions that went practically unanswered.I heard those questions showed up the incompetency,lack of commitment and lack of foresight by the immigration department.The meeting was a letdown based on the responses coming from the head table

    At that meeting in St Philip statements were made about the upsurge in the construction of so many condominiums and the response from our minister of immigration Arni Walters left those in attendance in total shock.He responded by suggesting that those condominiums would need maids,gardeners & general workers and hence would provide employment for Barbadians.That is the development this government has for Barbadians.After we have invested millions of dollars into educating our children & grand children,the only jobs that will be available to them are subservient jobs to the rich & famous who will be using Barbados as their play ground.It is so sad we have those sort of asses as our leaders.
    Another point was raised about a construction site in St James or St Peter where there is a sign stating Barbadians, please do not apply for jobs available.The response from the head table indicated that it would look into that situation.In general many searching questions were asked and the jack asses we have as minister of Immigration,chief immigration officer & permanent secretary in Defence & security were unable to respond in a sensible manner.

    My source indicated that the Barbadians who attended that meeting in St Philip left in a state of depression & bewilderment as a result of the response or lack of response from those responsible for managing our immigration matters.

    I was made aware that the construction company Homex recently laid off a number of Barbadian workers including a middle age gentleman from Carrington Village St Michael whose nickname is “Hobbes”who worked for that company for over thirty (30).years and all the non-nationals especially the Indo-Guyanese are still employed.
    I observed that the hotel owned by Chris McHale in Worthing opposite Worthing Police Station has almost all Indo-Guyanese employed.

    Barbadians this illegal immigration issue is out of control and we cannot depend on the likes of a Gilbert Greaves,Arni Walters or the lady who is the new chief immigration officer or indeed our Prime Minister David Thompson to rectify this issue.Those persons do not have the skills,the foresight or the courage to bring about the change that is require.It is up to us the people of Barbados who must force our leaders to take the necessarily action.The time has come to make this country ungovernable.


  17. Following reports of Mr. Arthur’s presentation at the Errol Barrow Centre for Creative Imagination last evening, there can be no doubt in the minds of the members of the PDC that the efforts of the hype-Doctors in some sections of the mass media – the traditional and non-traditonal – and in some sections of the so-called economic society at the UWI Cave Hill ( according to BU above ) and in the BLP in particular, to politically resuscitate a political has been like Arthur, and by extension a dying Barbados Labour Party, have failed and have failed abmyssally, miserably and massively.

    These hype-Doctors must probably be licking their wounds, and wondering what went wrong – for surely last evening must have been a public relations disaster too.

    Former Senator BLP Clyde Griffith is right: Mr. Arthur is a spent force and must truly ride off into the political sunset!! The other Griffith must clearly be disappointed, if NOT dismayed, at Arthur’s brackish, sub-keyed, incoherent and convoluted performance last evening.

    Furthermore, we have and will continue to say it that there exists in Barbados a serious and fundamental political intellectual leadership crisis, which if not correctly resolved within the next seven or so years, will invariably help lead to such outright political and social instability, degradation and ruin in much of this country in the next 30 to 40 years – that vast amounts of what many Barbadians have come to know over the yeears as quintessentially Barbados or Barbadian – and which would have been primarily achieved under the Adamses and Barrow eras, will be essentially wiped out by some very destructive local and international political forces.

    Thus, what we in the PDC have also deduced from these reports and from what has been written in the above BU lead thread – is that Mr. Arthur, the absentee parliamentarian – and who must by now be given the title of honorary life researcher at UWI – has given ostensible validity to, and confirmation of, those fears in last evening’s address.

    For, it is clear that he demonstrated ABSOLUTELY no kind of political intellectual vision or leadership at all and that he would have brought NOTHING of substance, politically and otherwise, at an event at which he was supposed to have starred; NOTHING SUBSTANTIAL what soever, NOTHING inspirational uplifting rivetting philosophically; NO new scientific methodologies and theories for helping our country to combat these kinds of political economic crises; NO statistical research data to support some of his contentions ( like there is no precedent in world history where austerity measures have lead to prosperity ) – NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE AT ALL AT ALL AT ALL. Just the same ole Arthur!! Arthur seems to think that this is still the 80s and 90s in Barbados.

    Moreover, what is obvious to the PDC is that Mr. Arthur is fairly bent on continuing a brand of politics of his that is old, tired, dingy and musty and that is based on his preoccupations with the IMF, his overstating the possible/impact of some global trade rules and policies on Barbados, bursts of raw emotions and political exactness and that is based on his amplification of petty distinctions. etc.

    And what is so contemptible from these reports and information provided in the thread above is that Mr. Arthur seems now to be playing unsavoury games with the psychologies of the Barbadian people – by talking about “proud Barbadians” the “uniqueness of the Bajan brand”, after helping to destroy many things Barbados and Barbadian with his CSME foolishness and unchecked immigration schemes when he was prime minister. Surely, Mr. Arthur must know that many Barbadians have NOT forgiven him for such ignorancies.

    Finally , however, while he is right say – according to the above thread – that “there is a lack of transformational government policies”, and to lend his support for continued mass access to tertiary education, he is absolutely NOT right to be treating the people of St. Peter and by extension the people of Barbados with his own silly puerile on and off political commentaries and eruptions on the way how the so-called economy would be performing or on any other matters of national interest at given times. Certainly, he must remember that many Barbadians resent many political people who often break their loyalties, who often grasshop and hop and skip, and who regularly blow hot and cold in regard of many things political, and how they penalize politically for such.

    PDC


  18. Efficiencies and effectiveness in capital spending are the keys.

    What percentage of capital expenditure is misspent by politicians and public servants?

    My own conservative estimate is that it is more than 30 %.

    For those who like numbers, check the capital expenditure for last year and work out 30 % of it and you will see that there would be enough savings to pay public servants a small increase and still reduce the deficit.

    Revenue could also be had by keeping a better track of what happens with customs.

    I am certain there is a lot of leakage at customs.


  19. NM whoever informed you did a good job! It was saddddd my girlfriend and I left before it concluded and were depressed!

    The only positive is that Barbadians are very intelligent people, who will not be manipulated or intimidated by any one!

    That was the only POSITIVE for the meeting!!!!


  20. David @ BU I could see from the comments being made that you would need a copy of Mr. Arthur’s speech. I will have it forwarded to you as soon as possible.


  21. @Adrian

    Please appreciate the lecture finished at 10.30PM.

    Please appreciate the BLP commenters on BU operate around Mottley and not Arthur therefore access to Arthur’s speech is a challenge so far, maybe JC can contact Arthurs office at Cave Hill or the president of the Cave Hill economic society to request a copy of the speech.

    Please appreciate BU took a decision to create this space for comment until we can post the speech. You would have noticed we insert such a request in the blog.


  22. See what I can do!!!!!


  23. Try the Office of Public Information 417-4076


  24. Ijust called the number I posted. Unfortunately they do not have it as yet since it was under the Young Economist Association however, the young lady took my name and number and will call me back ASAP!

    Those who are interested can call the department as well but … if I get it, I will post the lecture!!!!!


  25. @All…

    I tuned into CBC last night (it was painful), expecting to see the immediate past Prime Minster’s speech.

    To the best of my knowledge, it was not there.

    Please correct me if I’m wrong.

    I join with the question: are transcripts available?

  26. Bad Man Saying Nuttin Avatar
    Bad Man Saying Nuttin

    I wish people who don’t understand the basics of economics and government financing would
    1. take some time to educate themselves
    2. Read the IMF consultations and evaluations for themselves
    3. Stop coming on the blogs to comment on these matters til they do
    4. make informed comments

    Trained economist is so right. Arthur talks in circles. We have avoided taking the medicine for far too long. We have relied on borrowing to prop up the economy and the deficit for far too long with out ever attempting to trim it. This borrowing has financed a lot of excessive consumption and has left the Barbadian public at a loss as to the true cost or value of a lot of the services that they received. To incur more debt now to try to spend our way out of this crisis is more of the same and would be disastrous given the debt to GDP ratio.

  27. Trained Economist Avatar

    As far as I am aware, the funds in the sinking fund are counted as part of our foreign exchange reserves. Therefore payment of the loan will reduce our foreign exchange reserves by that amount. My understanding is that the current administration was speaking about the foreign exchange impact of paying that loan.

    By basic comment is whether Arthur is willing to admit to cooking the books.


  28. Try the following to get a copy of the transcript. A prepared speech for public consumption should not be this difficult to get.

    http://www.youngeconomist.org/upcoming-events/transforming-the-economy-in-the-age-of-liberlisation

    Chris Kinch 246-231-7976
    246-417-0250

    yeacavehill@yahoo.com


  29. @Adrian Hinds…

    Please note that the prepared speech is quite different than a transcript.

    The former is what was intended to be said by the presenter.

    The latter is what was *actually* said by /everyone/.

    Please note: transcripts are usually informed by audio and video recordings made during the event.

    Does anyone know about any audio or video recordings conducted during this event?

    Might they be shared?

  30. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    Pretty good overview of Mr Arthur’s speech, and each will take away different things.

    ‘Trained economist’ raises some good point and Mr. Arthur, as an economist-politician, argued both ways. He criticised the size of the deficit now, but later said that if GDP were measured correctly (estimated to be 30% greater than is), then the deficit would not be so high.

    The govt. guarantee of Four Seasons should raise the debt profile (and no one is arguing that the project would not be beneficial), as contingent liabilibities count as real liabilities.

    Past practices in having certain debt financing off balance sheet are now being recognized and have an effect on debt profile and debt service, which now appear worse than before. BUT, the government should always have acknowledged its debt obligations irrespective of how it was presented.

    Paying from the sinking fund is not the issue, but more that international reserves are lower than expected, so need more replenishing, a point highlighted just yesterday by Harold Coddrington.

    I think you have Prof. Persaud’s position on tertiary education wrong: my understanding is that he argued that UWI lose its unique position for govt. funding, not that the funding be cut. But he can correct that himself, as I have only read reported comments.

    Other points to make but maybe later.


  31. Tell them Bad man. The consultations are not that difficult to grasp.

    Since 2000 the IMF has been concerned about financial reporting by the GoB.

    Since 2000 the IMF has been calling for wage restraint. To my mind “restraint” “freeze” or “moratorium” leads to the same set of questions, and folks should remember that in 2005 while Politicians and others got a raise of pay the GoB was still calling for wage retraint.

    Since 2000 the IMF has been concern about our debt.

    All of this is easily gathered from a simple perousal of succesive IMF consultation since 2000.

  32. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    One of Mr Arthur’s defences about debt levels was the his government had left assets that people could see as pillars for the country’s development. Some may take issue with that, but his basic point was that borrowing for development is alright, while borrowing for consumption (as he labels the activities of the current administration) is not.

    On corruption, laws exist and like crying wolf, good governance means nothing if it is not put in place. If there are grounds for prosecution then the cases should be brought. It’s pretty disingenuous to keep railing about malfeasance without coming up with some evidence. Cost overruns are in the nature of many public projects and part of the blame is with government wanting to show lower costs and contractors bidding under cost and then stumping the public with the bill. Barbados is no different from the US or many countries in that regard. Where it may differ is in who foots the bill and/or how contracts are structured to deal with cost overruns.


  33. I think economic models should factorise-in the following financial
    variables
    (1) No Money
    (2) No Spending
    (3) No Borrowing
    (4) No Investment
    (5) No Growth
    (6) No Truth or Honesty

  34. Trained Economist Avatar
    Trained Economist

    Is the traditional media going to call Arthur on his book cooking? Or will the issue only be ventilated on BU?

    In his last budget statement (2009) Arthur made the point that the average 2.5% of gdp deficit run by his administration was carefully chosen and met the standards required by the European Union for member of the Euro.

    If the fiscal deficit calculated including off budget spending then there was a deficit of 10.1% in 2002, a deficit of 5% in 2003, a surplus of 1.3% in 2004, a deficit of 6.9% in 2005, deficit of 5.3% in 2006, deficit of 8% in 2008, deficit of 7.6% in 2008 and a deficit of 8.4% in 2009.

    Was Arthur using a measure comparable to the EU measure, were the deficits run by his administration not carefully chosen ones, or was he cooking the books?

    Has his decade long policy of massive spending, large fiscal deficts and large borrowing not left the country vulnerable to the prolonged and deep global recession we are now experiencing?

    In the 2002 recession he was able to be counter cyclical and run a fiscal deficit of 10% of GDP, and he seems to be recommending the same now. He could do so and get it away with it in 2002 because our debt to gdp was low enough that the rating agencies were not breathing down our necks, the recession was short-lived and growth returned to restore government revenues and he also understated the deficit with funny accounting.

    The new guys are far from perfect but at least they do not appear to be doing funny accounting as yet, so we are aware of the depth of the fiscal problem, we already have so much debt the ratings agencies are on our case and the end to the global recession seems elusive.

    In light of this I dismiss arthur’s counter cyclical proposal as political speak and economic madness. He seems to be a one trick pony, who does not seem to realize that the trick is unlikely to work in the current circumstances.

  35. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @Trained economist, one of Mr. Arthur’s other arguments, citing the very high debt levels of certain OECS countries, is that high debt burdens are a price for developing independent countries–and there’s lots of work on this that is supportive of that view, though the question is always there whether states such as in the OECS are viable, which is why their attempts to converge make sense.

    If counter cyclical is madness then what term would one use for procyclical in a recession?

  36. mash up & buy back Avatar
    mash up & buy back

    Negroman

    I got a report from someone close to me who attended that townhall meeting and the report I received was similar to yours.

    People are not happy at all with the immigration persons there.


  37. then one has to wonder how about his views on the Four Seasons project.

    What else is there to build, to both support kenesian style “government initiated worksprojects” to stimulate the economy, and at the same time can be herald as a potential money earner or can at least pay for itself in the future? We can point to these “pillars” development” Owen had built, that is if we can raise our heads from the depression some say we are in. What good are they to us now? what good could the money spent on them be to us right now?

    Barbados can be different, than the US regarding cost overruns. We cannot print money as freely as they do. We do not have the room to absorb overruns as they do. We must make every effort to make our limited resourses work for us. A little effort in accountability where little exist can make a big difference.


  38. @all

    A downloadable version of Arthur’s speech is in the BU Library(top of page).

  39. Bad Man Saying Nuttin Avatar
    Bad Man Saying Nuttin

    tell me the “developmental assets that we borrowed to finance?

    A Jail
    Kensington
    Gems

    I contend that if you run deficits while financing things like transport board, BWA, CBC and gas prices you are essentially financing consumption no matter what you say.


  40. @David,

    I don’t see the speech in the library – what number is it at?


  41. It seems Arthur is of the position that running a deficit is fine because part of todays development is for the benefit of future generations so why shouldn’t they have to pay.


  42. PDC
    For the first time I am agreeing with you.
    Mr. Arthur is being promoted as this economic genius and Barbadians were saying before the last election that this was a good election for any party to lose. The economy was in bad shape then. He was the Prime minister for fourteen years. Why did he not reposition the Barbados economy?

  43. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @PDC,

    How do you explain a leader who has contributed so much “NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE” staying in power for 14 years?


  44. Thanks Brutus, will have a look.

    The examples he gave on assets left by the BLP are the Coast Guard which responded to a security issue and the Judicial Centre because it justice represented 15% of GDP.

  45. """ FIRE """ Avatar
    “”” FIRE “””

    ……..AND THAT IS WHY OWEN SHOULD BE STILL RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT; if you all are claiming that he is responsible for the mess, why vote in the DLP to clean up Owen ;s mess?? huh ? huh ?

    The electorate therefore made a mistake.
    Lets go back to the polls and let Owen clean up the mess.
    Wunna cant have wunna cake and eat um too

  46. """ FIRE """ Avatar
    “”” FIRE “””

    None o wunna never run a government yet so wunna just talking and talking and talking and –thats all !

  47. notesfromthemargin Avatar
    notesfromthemargin

    having read Mr. Arthur’s speech, perhaps the one feature that I found remarkable, was that in between the expected politcal cut and thrust of the speech was the presence of an overall strategic world view. Something that I have found to be missing of late.

    Yes management of the deficit is vitally important, as is our level of debt. However I found that Arthur always placed his actions within a larger context, something that has been profoundly missing in the last two years.

    I am deeply concerned that we have a head of Government who could make the statement that the goal of one graduate per household has led to a situation of “clerks with degrees” and hence should be “reconsidered”. Such a view betrays a lack of vision beyond what is immediately apparent.

    Similarly, discussion of such things as the WTO, EPA’s, and their impacts on Barbados seem to have disappeared from public discussion of late. In short, we appear to be in reaction mode dealing with the current crisis and sparing no thought to future crises which can clearly be seen approaching.

    Mr. Arthur’s stewarship was far from perfect, and some aspects of his administration lacked transparency, however I do find the current administration’s lack of an enunciated strategic vision deeply concerning.

  48. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    Helpful, though the format makes the document run to 260+ pages!

  49. Trained Economist Avatar
    Trained Economist

    Thanks for the full length article. I am really annoyed at Arthur speaking at length about his 2% deficits in front of the Young Economists Association.

    He knows that the 2% deficit is a fraudulent number yet he insisted on repeating it in from of the young people.

  50. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @Trained economist, you can write to the Young Economists Association and/or call them and express that displeasure, even offer to give a presentation on the matter. Hopefully, if there are any good students in the body, they will already have come to a similar conclusion as you and will be ready for academic honesty battling on Monday, if not as we speak.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading