Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Observing
There was the story of the boiling frog.

The story goes that a frog placed suddenly into boiling water would jump out. But place it in cool water and raise the heat slowly, and it may not recognise the danger until it is too late. It adjusts to the change. It becomes comfortable with the discomfort. It tells itself that things are not so bad, especially compared to what could happen.

Sometimes I wonder whether that is what has been happening to Barbados.

Murder rates went up. Not overnight, but gradually enough that we have had time to get used to it. We hear of another shooting, another stabbing, another young man killed, another family grieving, and for a few days we are shocked. Then the next story comes along. People now speak of crime as though it is simply part of modern Barbados, as though we have no choice but to accept it.

The roads take longer and longer to repair. Potholes stay where they are until people learn how to drive around them. Vehicles get damaged, tyres burst, suspensions suffer, and people make the same complaints year after year. The cost of living keeps rising too. Groceries cost more, rent costs more, electricity costs more, insurance costs more, school supplies cost more. Yet somehow we are expected to keep adjusting, to make the same money stretch further and further, and to pretend that this is just how life is now.

Accountability in goverment seems to have disappeared along the way. Questions are asked, statements are made, committees are formed, reports are promised, and then very often nothing further is heard. We have grown used to explanations without consequences. We have grown used to hearing that matters are being addressed, while the same matters return again and again.

And what has happened to the education system that Barbados was once so proud of? Education was supposed to be the great equaliser. It was what gave the child from a struggling home a real chance to rise, to qualify, to work and to build a life. Now teachers are stretched, parents are frustrated, schools are under pressure, and too many children seem to be passing through the system without the support, discipline and basic skills they need. We still talk about education as though it remains our greatest strength, but are we really looking closely enough at what is happening?

Community life has changed as well. There was a time when people knew their neighbours, children could be corrected by a responsible adult, and the village helped to raise the child. Now there is more fear, more criminal activity, more isolation and less trust. We close our gates earlier. We watch one another more carefully. Too many young people are finding belonging in the wrong places, and too many communities are losing the sense of togetherness that once protected them.

Social services are under strain. Families need more help. The elderly need more support. Children need intervention. Housing is becoming more difficult. Mental-health concerns are more visible than ever. Yet the very services that are supposed to help people seem to be carrying more and more weight with less and less capacity, and the cracks are beginning to show.

We have also had an influx of thousands of Caribbean neighbours seeking work, opportunity and a better life. There is nothing wrong with that. Barbadians have travelled across the region and the world seeking the same things. But a country has to plan for growth. It has to have the housing, school spaces, health services, transport, jobs and social infrastructure to manage it. When planning falls behind reality, the pressure is felt by everyone, both Barbadians and those who have come here hoping to make an honest life.

Then there are the sky-high monstrosities going up along the coastline. Buildings that seem out of place, blocking views, changing communities and in some cases making beach access more difficult for ordinary people. We call it development, but development should improve the life of the country as a whole. It should not leave people feeling like strangers in the communities where they were born and raised.

The middle class is disappearing quietly. People who work hard, pay taxes, raise children properly and try to live decent lives are finding that a decent job does not always produce a decent life anymore. Buying a home, helping children through school, saving for retirement and having even a small amount of peace of mind are becoming harder to achieve. We are slowly becoming a country of people who are either doing very well, or barely holding things together.

And then there is our flirtation with democracy. Three straight 30-0 victories may look impressive on paper, but a Parliament without an elected opposition is not a healthy place for a country to remain for too long. Opposition is not supposed to be an enemy of government. It is supposed to ask questions, challenge decisions, expose weaknesses and make those in power explain themselves. Now we have gone further, with a constitutional change that can leave a Member of Parliament without a seat if he or she resigns from, is expelled by, or crosses the floor from the political party that brought them there. Whatever the intention, it is difficult not to wonder what space remains for independence, conscience and dissent when party loyalty becomes so closely tied to parliamentary survival.

And through all of this, we fete. We have fun. We frolic. There is nothing wrong with joy, culture, music, lime and celebration. Barbados should enjoy itself. But somewhere along the way, fete, fun and frolic began to overcome family, responsibility and serious conversation. Sometimes it feels as though the music has become loud enough to drown out the things we do not want to face.

The danger is not that Barbados will collapse overnight.

The danger is that we will keep adjusting.

We will adjust to another murder. Another broken road. Another increase at the supermarket. Another child slipping through the cracks. Another scandal with no consequence. Another beach becoming harder to access. Another family who cannot manage. Another promise that disappears after the microphones are turned off.

And then one day, we may look around and ask ourselves when the Barbados we knew began to disappear.

Perhaps the water has been getting hotter for much longer than we are prepared to admit.

Perhaps the real question is whether we are finally ready to notice. Or are we willing to continue boiling slowly.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

46 responses to “Barbadians and the Boiling Frog”


  1. What a tmely post, as unread as it is currently.

    We hope it covers some general ideas currently occupying this writer’s mind.

    That an American lawyer could be arrested in the UK for saying in the USA that genocide is happening in Gaza is emblematic of the boiling frog metaphor or reality or syndrome.

    Where are all those free speech, human rights, progressive advocates now. At this rate Pacha might best be advised to stay away from the UK and Western capitals, more generally.

    This is not the first neither would it be the last. There is long list of people being detained, imprisoned, harrassed, being made to be in self-imposed exile and more for just saying what is generally known to be true.

    As this Western frog boils it’s certain that only fascism could be the endpoint. Indeed, our goose might have already been over-cooked, for a boiling frog feels no pain, until!


  2. Celebration Coins

    Drumpf made 1.4 billion as it issued around his inauguration.

    Since then this con man’s trick has lost 95 percent of its value.

    Drumpf is not the frog. The foolish people who gave away their good money for this Ponzi Scheme are.

    Boil baby boil!


  3. @Observing

    There is nothing anyone can add, your piece captures the many challenges at play in modern day Barbados.


  4. That is never true.

    Indeed, impossible!

    For it is impossible for even the most astute Observer, no pun intended, to have a third eye to see the seeing of all third eyes with a single set of Observations.

    Even with a magnum opus, and this cannot be. Far less an opus minus which it must be.


  5. Questions over visitor data

    by SHAWN CUMBERBATCH

    shawncumberbatch@nationnews.com

    QUESTIONS ARE BEING RAISED about the accuracy of official data used to measure Barbados’ tourism industry performance, following the disclosure that some of the island’s visitor arrival numbers were over-estimated.

    The Barbados Statistical Service (BSS) has published a Visitor Arrivals Revision Note to announce that 28 073 fewer long-stay visitors than originally reported entered the country between December 2024 and March 2025.

    Economist Dr Ankie Scott-Joseph said the news that visitor arrivals were overcounted during the peak of last year’s winter tourist season had left the major question of what other key industry metrics, including foreign exchange earnings, were impacted by the error.

    Technical issues

    In addition, economist Jeremy Stephen sees it as a reminder why it is important not to place too much emphasis on arrivals numbers, and he queried what value the revision had at this time.

    “During the period December 2024 to March 2025, technical issues affecting the primary source data from the Barbados Immigration Department necessitated the use of an alternative data source in an effort to provide the most accurate possible estimates of arrival numbers while the [information technology] issues were being resolved,” the BSS explained in the note.

    “Subsequent monitoring and evaluation indicated that limitations in the alternative source, particularly the absence of sufficiently granular information on traveller intent, such as length of stay and purpose of visit and variations within specific traveller subcomponents, resulted in an over-estimation of long-stay visitor arrivals during the period under review.

    “Consequently, the BSS has revised its visitor arrival numbers for the aforementioned period,” the state agency added.

    It was originally estimated that Barbados welcomed 321 423 stay visitors in that December 2024 to March 2025 period, but those numbers have been revised down to 293 350, an 8.73 per cent change. The BSS did not specify from which countries the visitors arrived.

    The biggest overestimation was for February. The original estimate was 79 406 but the revised figure is 67 469 – which is 11 937 visitors fewer or a 15.03 per cent decline. The other revisions were December 2024 – 79 303 (originally 87 112), January 2025 – 71 268 (originally 77 967), and March 2025 – 75 310 (originally 76 938).

    Scott-Joseph, who is an economics lecturer at the University of the West Indies (UWI) Cave Hill Campus, said: “Tourism receipts are the island’s main source of United States dollars, so an over-stated arrival count means the published estimate of how much foreign exchange was coming in was overstated too.

    “If the count was off for four months, the fair question is: what else built on the same source, visitor spending and average length of stay among them, was carrying the same error?”

    She added: “One quarter of an overstatement does not threaten the reserves, which are real and remain where they are. The revision note corrects the visitor table and goes no further.

    “It does not say whether tourism receipts, the balance of payments and the quarterly output figures for December to March have been brought into line with the lower count.

    Working estimates

    “The wise course is to treat monthly arrival figures as working estimates and to wait for the agencies to reconcile the full picture before drawing firm conclusions about the season.”

    Stephen, a former lecturer in banking and finance at UWI, said it was “unfortunate that an alternative could not present the level of granularity that is necessary to run a good analysis”.

    “But we all know some of the issues that economists tend to have with arrival numbers in general, and how it is meant to show that an industry is performing well, where it misses out stuff such as spend,” he noted.

    His view was that with the system the BSS usually relied on unavailable at the time, “it is a case of pulling data from the wrong place in the interim, hoping that it aligned with what your nonaggregated sources would have stated”.

    Scott-Joseph recalled that “this is not the first time the official visitor count has been wrong”.

    “At the end of 2019, when the old paper embarkation and disembarkation cards were scrapped in favour of automated border tracking, the new system could not always record how long visitors stayed or why they came, resulting in years of silent undercounting,” she said.

    “When the agencies finally reconciled the figures in 2023, the revision was big enough to add around $148 million to the 2022 real economy and to restate that year’s tourism growth from 180 per cent to 238 per cent.

    “The 2023 correction ran in the country’s favour. It made the recovery look stronger and lifted the growth rate, so there was every reason to carry it through the accounts quickly. This time, the correction runs the other way,” she observed.

    Source: Nation


  6. Reading is essential

    IF THERE IS ONE THING HUMANS and, by extension, communities and societies, love is rituals. Rituals, or traditions come about in several ways and for several reasons. There is usually a very good reason for them to exist in the first place, a reason that often disappears over time, where upon the ritual just evolves into a “this is just a thing that we do” situation.

    Here in Barbados, we of course have several traditions and the one we have at this time of year is the ritualistic celebration of the high achievers in the soon to be defunct Common Entrance Examination, combined with the hand-wringing and general angst over the significance of overall results of the assessment in mathematics and English.

    The trend continued this year with the customary lamentations about girls outperforming boys overall (top student being male, notwithstanding), with apologists offering reasons why that would be so. Again there was talk about the outstanding performances of students from private primary schools in contrast to their peers from public ones, and how the availability of differing resources, classroom sizes, quality of teachers or parental support facilitated different outcomes between the two groups, with the former being more dominant results-wise than the latter.

    Perhaps most striking, to me at least, was the revelation of yet a further decline in the national mean in English. It has reached a new low of 64.2. This downward trend has been happening the last few years (with last year’s result which was 72.5 perhaps an outlier), seemingly in defiance of stated efforts by the authorities to reverse this trajectory, via the National Literacy Programme, among other initiatives.

    Comments ascribed to literacy specialist Shantelle Morgan in another section of the press are very telling. Apparently she believes the results show that “young learners’ grammar and comprehension are not at an acceptable level”. She acknowledged “concerns about students’ competency in grammar, vocabulary [and] comprehension”.

    To me, none of this is surprising. We have these challenges because there is simply not enough reading going on in homes across this country. We have long been talking about deficits in reading and writing presenting in children and young adults right up to tertiary level. The weaknesses also show up in our creative expression, particularly in songwriting, as well as in public speaking where formal expression is required.

    Reading must be promoted

    The Government can put on as many literacy programmes as it likes: if reading is not promoted as a practice, as something a young person can and should do recreationally and not as a chore, for school or as punishment, then those programmes’ effectiveness would be limited.

    These are, of course, different times where, despite the easier access to reading material via the various digital tools that pervade our lives, many people, including our children, elect to use them to scroll social media feeds and/or play video games, or watch TikTok videos. Many adults are not “readers” so they would not model that for their charges.

    When I was a boy, now many moons ago, we did not have access to much in the way of electronically provided entertainment, so that when we were not outside doing things (usually of the clean variety), a lot of us defaulted to finding something to read. People around me read, whether it was the newspapers (including the “big able” Advocate when it was a broadsheet), Mills and Boons and Harlequin romance series (not me!), the Mack Bolan series, Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew, the William books, Archie comics (where, thanks to Dilton Doiley, I first learned the word equilibrium), Marvel and DC comics, Asterix and Tintin comics (yes, lots of comics!), and the books by the problematic Enid Blyton, among others.

    When you wanted to read about places or things, you perhaps had to grab an encyclopedia, and look up words in dictionaries and thesauruses.

    So, that kind of exposure to and engagement with literary works of all kinds improved the reading ability of many of us and enabled a heightened appreciation for the written word and for the standard form of the English language in general. The ability to read well underpins all the skills which the authorities are suggesting are increasingly lacking in students these days. It does not help that we may not be insisting on high standards of reading and writing in our children, as may have been the case in years gone by.

    The life journey which brought me to this space in the newspaper has its genesis in a love for reading that took root and was nurtured in my youth. Sadly, because everything is captured neatly and conveniently in a video, or in a movie adaptation of a comic or book, less people are prepared to go through the cognitive exercise that is reading, and one can argue they are the poorer for it. Let us make reading truly essential again.

    Randy Batson is a researcher, social commentator and social advocate. Email ranric1@hotmail.com

    Source: Nation


  7. Stuart bemoans state of politics

    DEMOCRACY IN BARBADOS is in peril and it is up to the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) to save it, declared former Prime Minister Freundel Stuart.

    He was the featured speaker at a DLP St Philip South branch meeting at Princess Margaret Secondary School in Six Roads Sunday night. His topic was The State Of Politics In Barbados.

    “There is something fundamentally wrong in this country that has to be fixed. We cannot continue to accept these things as though we don’t know any better. The Democratic Labour Party, this party, has work to do . . . and there is nobody else who is going to fix it but the Democratic Labour Party,” he told those gathered.

    Stuart said the main things which worried him the most, causing him to feel “sick to [my] stomach” after witnessing them come to pass, included what he deemed to be an attack on the independence of the judiciary, the amendment to the Constitution to bar crossing the floor by Members of Parliament (MPs) and judge-only trials.

    The former St Michael South MP said the change made, where a sitting judge could be removed if he or she had not made a decision in six months, was worrisome as it was moved from being an aspirational eight-month period to something punitive.

    “There are cases where judges just can’t meet that eight-month deadline. But if you can’t meet it, just indicate to the Chief Justice that you are having some problems, explain the circumstances – no problem, no sanctions, anything.

    “[However], they amended the Constitution of Barbados in 2019. They obviously came to the conclusion that giving a judge eight months to write reserve decisions was giving the judge too much time, and that judges needed to have more pressure put on them, and therefore, they reduced that from eight months to six months.

    “In addition to that, they moved that provision from being aspirational and ethical to being legal, and they put it in the Constitution. I know of no other country in the world, certainly in the Commonwealth, that has done that,” he said, adding defendants had the right to appear in court without the concern that the judge was under pressure.

    Stuart said members of the current administration were throwing away their own rights by passing the anti-defection amendment, as this worked counter to the freedoms granted to an MP. He said the Head of State should be the only one able to ask MPs to vacate their position, but the amendment left out the Head of State altogether and made the process partisan, thereby referencing political parties in the Constitution for the first time.

    “We now have a law where a person who wants to cross the floor has to vacate their seat. What madness is this? No tradition is now considered sacred; you can behave like a political iconoclast and nobody says anything,” he stressed.

    As for judge-only trials, the veteran attorney argued that this “subtracted” from democracy. He said there was a similar situation in the United Kingdom, but attorneys there called it madness and dismissed it.

    “The theory is, so they say, that if an accused elects to be tried by a judge alone, that will help reduce the backlog. The lawyers in England say that’s madness, they don’t have any time for that foolishness, but the laws have been passed here already . . . .

    “This backlog talk has overtaken the public discourse. Jury trials were an affirmation of democracy . . . but getting back to one-man trials is a subtraction from democracy. But that has passed as well – no debate, everybody happy and we go happily along,” he said.

    “Democracy dies behind closed doors, in the dark. So as citizens of this country, we have to make sure to keep an eagle eye out for these occurrences and try to stop them when we see them happening. Because once you get into a rhythm of accepting these things, the situation will get worse and worse and worse,” he warned. (CA)

    Source: Nation


  8. Substantively

    And now that we’ve properly read. We must agree to some extent with the view that this represents a better than average offering.

    Truly!

    However, and readers might have Observed that there can never be the absence of an however.

    As well recited are the social ills well adumbrated by the writer. He or she fails to connect them together in a meaningful way.

    What do these Observations mean when considers all together?

    Certainly, one by itself or a few combined, even if others which might have been missed, could have been seen as anomolies, deviations from social norms, blamed on externalities, the presumed political attitudes of the Observer, etc.

    But when all of this social disorder as Observed by the writer is present there is also an obligation to locate causation. If people are being killed, whose finger is on the trigger, who made the gun, what are the forces driving this result.

    For these forces cannot exist unless something or somethings are fundamentally wrong, not only within Barbados, but within the master narratives which have long guided this society.

    The claim that the country has an endless ability to adjust to increasing levels of social degeneration is not supported by either facts or history. Observer should not have to appear to be trying to moderate the natural consequences of his Observations. Let the chio fall where they might.

    Indeed, neither do countries or empires or societies have an inherent right to always exist. Or means to persist regardless to the forces encountered or imposed, as purported.

    Next time, Observer must have grown the balls, the intestinal fortitude, to tell his readers where causation is fundamentally located, square the circle, don’t just draw lines to nowhere.

    There has never been nor will ever be a perfect article, a perfect book, though Bushie would disagree, a perfect world. So for any editor to so presume represents a clear falsehood.

    In total, Observer is best encouraged to continue writing, of honing his craft as a weapon directed at the sources causing him/her worry.


  9. “In total, Observer is best encouraged to continue writing, of honing his craft as a weapon directed at the sources causing him/her worry.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    …at Pacha…!!!???

    LOL
    ha ha ha
    murduh!!

    BTW @ Pacha
    ‘Perfection’ is a brilliant concept, represented by the CREATORS themselves, and it sets a target standard – towards which brass bowls are meant to aim.

    Therefore perfection DOES exist! …in a spiritual realism that is well beyond our imagination.
    It ALSO exists as a GOAL to be strived for, during our temporary sojourn in this messed up cauldron called ‘Project Life on Earth’.

    Indeed, the SINGLE most important priority in this short existence has been listed (in a place that is taboo to you) as the pursuit of EXACTLY this perfection.

    Seek ye FIRST the PERFECTION of the CREATOR…
    …and the lotta other distracting jobby will OVERFLOW on your table…

    Here is the BIG JOKE…
    That ‘perfection’ is about things such as…
    LOVE
    SELFLESSNESS (the opposite of albino centricity)
    PATIENCE
    LONG SUFFERING for brassbowlery (Bushie’s key weakness lol)
    TRUTH, RIGHTEOUSNESS, PEACE
    …and critically, it is about “the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” (so Pacha’s donkey is sadly unarmed against Observing’s weapons – LOL)

    What a CREATION!!
    What a plan!


  10. @ David

    Personally I have never paid attention to the arrival figures. My sole concern is the the spend figures recorded in the central bank report.

    It does not matter how many people enter a store only what is left in the cash register at the end of the day.


  11. It was clearly Fruendel Staurt and his misleadership party which fecklessly gave the death knel to the Bajan society.

    Them, by themselves did not cause it but were the ones at the wheel when decadence threatened and that coward, as defined by Barrow himself, was ineffectual while at the wheel.

    Again we have an arsonist pretending to be a firefighter. Neither Stuart nor Sandiford, not even Bree St.John, should have ever been leaders of any country.


  12. @John A

    When Adrian Loveridge was active, he and others repeatedly made the point that we need a more relevant metric to measure performance in the tourism industry.

    Recently popular social commentator on economics Marla Duckoran has been reemphasizing the point. Through it all our leaders continue to wave arrival numbers, including cruise ship arrivals, which only serve to distort and mislead.

    In God we trust!


  13. @ David

    The arrival figures are for good politics. A politician can get on a microphone and hail we had so many tourist over such a period. When you ask them about spend you will hear the figures are not yet finalised.

    What we are miles away from is establish what the NET gain was by toursim for a particular year. In other words what did we net in tourism after deducting all the cost of supporting a tourist industry. This would mean accounting for advertising, staffing and all other input costs deducted from toursim revenue. Then we have the unofficial tourism sector like hair braiders etc, whose input does not form part of the central bank toursim revenue report.

    One would think that in 2026 we would be way further in collecting such data, but that sadly is not the case.


  14. So for example some simple data that would help in the Central bank report on tourism would be.

    Revenue from room stock. For example if we had more rooms one would expect earnings to increase, BUT would it increase percentage wise in relation to room stock? for example if we had 1000 rooms netting a million dollars would an increase to 1500 rooms net 1.5 million, or would we net 1.2 million hence watering down our return per room?

    There needs to be more information by category given so we can see where the gains and losses come from. This would help investors to see where the investment opportunities are in the industry as well.


  15. Bushie

    Like de old people would say “if weeee see your guts on the bay, weee know it”.

    The only pity is that you, “like the great multitude” would too bring this incarnation to an end having failed to see the unavoidable truths, believing foolishness.


  16. @John A

    Let us say we are able to identify revenue leakage to efficiently manage KPIs in the sector. How would that change anything? A foolish question?


  17. @ David

    Actually a good question. So first thing is it will help us recognise a safe investment and manageable level of room stock. So lets say you move from an average of $80 a night in a year to $90 A night after increasing room stock by 30%, then you would know the return per room does not support a further growth in room stock. Now if you increased room stock by 30% and average room return a year increased by 28%, one could argue there is slightly more room for an increase in room stock.

    Likewise let say if the restaurant sector increased by 20% and average meal return increased by 30%, one would see another restaurant having a chance to make a dollar.

    It’s like if everyone invest in onions but not enough grow tomatoes, then there may well be an opportunity in tomatoes. In tourism investors need to see what sector and sub sector has potential in order to make informed decisions. To simply state one gross figure and say that is what tourism returned in 2026 is not good enough.


  18. @John A

    If it is ever discovered that trapping revenue in the tourism industry is not dissimilar to when Henry had to Dear Lisa to fix the bucket.

    What would an action plan look like to address?

  19. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    A solid offering.
    Albeit, the observations of nuanced changes within the balance are true everywhere.
    The unknown is what, if anything, will be enough for the minions of any ruled entity to rebel. The tipping point.
    As far as the release of inaccurate public numbers, this writer has so claimed for many years. When last March, over $1.5B in expenses from prior years suddenly emerged, what more do others need to know? You cannot accidentally miss those amounts? It was intentional. The same way any formal report from the NIS has been intentionally withheld.
    But we like it so. Causin’ it’s WE lying to WE, not some stinking ferner (even if WE pay them millions in consulting fees). And the peeple obviously don’t care how much they get jerked around. Tek it, and keep on partying. A home grown situation. Don’t sweat, all these anomalies are being addressed. Better take care Bajans don’t get known as Frogs 😁


  20. David So you may start with just a few categories.

    ACCOMODATION
    RESTAURANTS
    ACTIVITES

    These would get us started and break the total spend into basic sub categories. Yes these can be expanded on but I think these would cover at least 90% of spend. You could break out activites in things like shopping, island tours etc but for this initial purpose grouping them under activites is a start.


  21. @John A

    Having accomplished what you are suggesting, what would be the next steps to improve current practices?


  22. Working estimates

    “The wise course is to treat monthly arrival figures as working estimates and to wait for the agencies to reconcile the full picture before drawing firm conclusions about the season.”

    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    CB written reports indicates the the figures were estimates and which agency provided them.

    Additionally, in the appendix theyalso indicate that most figures are estimated ( ex. Tourist spend , gdp, etc )


  23. What the article in today’s Nation pointed out is that an ERROR was made in the compilation of the tourist numbers.


  24. @ David

    I believe if this information was available people wanting to invest in the toursim sector would be more aware of where the opportunity for a return lies. In other words if restaurants were flat year to year, but activities were showing good growth a person wanting to invest, would have a better chance of return investing in activities.

    So if we bring it down to a store for example, it is not good enough to say the store sells a million dollars a month and not know what areas are growing the quickest and which are flat. We need to look at the tourism earning figures the same way. This would make investment a safer experience for those wanting to get involved.


  25. The quote before my comment was taken from the nation new article as posted here on BU


  26. I suspect there are many more things to be “shocked” about.

    Just Observing
    ——————————————————
    Shock on work site
    Govt probing living state of migrants

    by MARIA BRADSHAW mariabradshaw@nationnews.com

    A HIGH-LEVEL GOVERNMENT TEAM led by Prime Minister Mia Amor Mottley descended on a construction site yesterday, discovering 68 migrant workers living in deplorable, inhumane conditions – and promptly gave the company just hours to clear them out.

    The DAILY NATION understands the dramatic intervention came after the Barbados Workers’ Union (BWU) blew the whistle on the unlicensed barracks during a Social Partnership meeting at Ilaro Court involving the construction sector, trade unions and officials from the Ministry of Labour and Ministry of Home Affairs.

    The meeting was abruptly paused.

    Mottley, Minister of Labour Colin Jordan, BWU general secretary Toni Moore and public health officials visited two sites associated with the construction firm. What they found sparked immediate outrage.

    Without a barrack licence to legally house the 68 Colombian and Indian labourers, the company was issued an ultimatum to relocate the men by last night.

    Confirmed

    Jordan confirmed the situation to the DAILY NATION yesterday evening. While not revealing the name of the construction company, he issued a detailed statement on the matter, pointing out that investigations were ongoing.

    “The Ministry of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector confirms that concerns relating to the welfare and accommodation of migrant workers engaged by a construction firm were brought to the attention of Government and social partners by the general secretary of the Barbados Workers’ Union during a tripartite construction sector meeting chaired earlier today by [the] Prime Minister.”

    Following the on-site shock, ministry officials, union representatives and the construction firm’s management were hauled into a meeting chaired by Jordan.

    He said it was to “establish the facts, record the matters requiring attention and set out immediate next steps”.

    “That meeting . . . lasted close to three hours and reviewed a number of issues, including accommodation arrangements, bathroom and sanitary facilities, access to running water, transportation to and from work, and deductions appearing on pay slips.”

    The Government has now demanded a full manifest of every migrant worker engaged by the company – including names, identification numbers and employment particulars.

    Jordan also issued a stern warning to the company.

    “Immediate improvements are required,” he said. “Immediate action means action without delay . . . . Whatever arrangements are necessary to remedy any condition below acceptable standards must be made now, including alternative arrangements for workers where required.”

    The minister made it clear that Barbados will not be a safe haven for corporate exploitation.

    “We will not accept any less with respect to the health, safety or welfare of workers in this country, and that includes migrant workers in this country,” he stated.

    While framing the current probe as a fact-finding mission, Jordan warned that the Chief Labour Officer and Chief Medical Officer were standing by to levy any statutory penalties.

    “Breaches of the law must be addressed, and they will be,” he warned. “That legal addressing of breaches, however, is no substitute for ensuring that there is immediate addressing of flagrant breaches of good industrial relations practice and decent working and living conditions.”

    When reached last night, management of the construction company confirmed the action but said it was not aware of what was taking place inside the quarters.

    It claimed the unsanitary state of the living quarters was not due to negligence, but rather the “cultural habits” of some of the workers. Management insisted the quarters were properly built and outfitted, pointing out that a team from the Ministry of Labour had inspected the site just last December.

    Management also stated it was not aware it had to seek a “barrack licence” in order to house the workers.

    The ministry has vowed to monitor the company’s undertakings closely, stressing the need to protect the dignity and privacy of the displaced workers as the investigation continues.

    Copyright (c) 2026 Nation Publishing Co. Limited, Edition 7/2/2026


  27. Well, weee would have imagined that worse things are happening, even if unknown.

    And are these not the natural consequences of a race to the bottom within the brand of capitalism the country is intent on?

    Certainly, all other metrics of human needs like medical attention for workers would not be available in the circumstances above.

    From a reading those conditions seem to be similar to concentration camps, like during war time.

    And the regime should not be able to hide from these. For these are the handiwork of Mia Mottley, the general secretary of the BWU and this administration more generally.

    We should not be minded that those responsible will ever find religion. Expect worse!


  28. One problems with importing labour as the primary national response!

    One of the many affects of the genocidal work of Clyde Gollop and the Barbados Family Plaaning Association since the 1960s.

    The failures of successive governments, especially this one, to reverse the genocide as constructed by the Eugenesis Movement.

    Of course, when a Brassbowl population decides that a wicker must lead forever. Well, Barrow would have been prophetic much to his chagrin we fear, even though he wasn’t much unlike what we have now.


  29. Hi David 

    We thought you might be interested in our latest report analysing tourism performance and policy developments across 53 OECD and partner countries.  

    International tourist arrivals in OECD countries rose by an estimated 3.4% in 2025 to reach a record 847 million, building on strong growth of 8.1% in 2024.  

    However, as geopolitical tensions, shifting traveller behaviour, and extreme weather-related events continue to shape the tourism landscape, destinations will need to strengthen their ability to anticipate and adapt to uncertainty, according to a new OECD report. 

    OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2026 shows that the conflict in the Middle East has disrupted global travel flows and increased costs, which is weighing on traveller confidence. Countries in the region are most impacted, along with destinations reliant on the Gulf for air connectivity. These effects are likely to persist in the near term. 

    “Tourism continues to grow, generating business opportunities, jobs and tax revenues across the OECD,” OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann said. “Governments and businesses need to work together to sustain this growth and build resilience. This means applying the lessons of the pandemic and the conflict in the Middle East to strengthen crisis preparedness, and managing tourism and visitor flows to ensure the sector delivers lasting benefits.” 

    Concerns about safety, affordability and cancellations may influence travel decisions, leading travelers to favour more familiar and affordable destinations, shorter stays and lower-cost options. As airlines, tour operators and other tourism providers adjust their programmes for 2027 and beyond, destinations will need to anticipate changing travel patterns and adapt their strategies to evolving geopolitical, economic and weather-related risks. 

    In a recent OECD survey, one third of OECD countries expect tourism performance to exceed 2025 levels by the end of this year, with many breaking new records.  But the picture varies significantly across OECD countries.  

    Four countries recorded double-digit growth in 2025 to reach record levels of inbound arrivals, led by Finland (up 16.5%), Japan (up 15.8%), Korea (up 15.7%) and Norway (up 12.5%). This builds on a strong recovery in 2024 in Korea and Japan (up 48.4% and 47.1% respectively), aided by expanded connectivity and a weak yen. 

    Meanwhile, international tourist arrivals fell in four countries in 2025 and have yet to recover to pre-pandemic levels: Canada (down 0.6%); Germany (down 0.8%); Ireland (down 2.8%); and the United States (down 5.5%). Inbound tourism in Israel has also been significantly impacted by conflicts in the Middle East, and arrivals remain significantly below pre-pandemic levels (down 70.8%). For more information, please contact Shayne Maclachlan  

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2 rue André Pascal, Paris, 75116 France

    For all inquiries, please contact us at: shayne.maclachlan@oecd.org
    If you would like to opt out of future emails, please unsubscribe


  30. @ Observing
    One thing that is NOT shocking – is the fact that the PM saw the need to be involved up front in the matter.

    It is common knowledge that many of these mogul construction gods LAUGH in the faces of ALL of the various enforcement agencies in the place. Their powers appear to originate at the highest levels.
    The PM’s direct intervention would suggest that she also seems to be aware of the level at which these Money Moguls operate.

    Normal circumstances would have warranted GROUND-LEVEL health / environmental / immigration agencies to investigate, adjudicate and apply the laws and rules as appropriate.
    Of course such a process would inevitable have been ‘guided’ by a phone call that usually makes the agencies look like ‘yard boys and girls’… and being laughed at..

    To avoid this situation being leaked all over social media, it would appear that the issue was bounced directly to the ‘appeals board’…

    What a place!
    A model mafia arrangement.


  31. This is an opportunity for the BWU, lead by Toni Moore – an insider- to accrue goodwill for the BWU.


  32. So let me ask the question that the politicians will not touch.

    Based on what you saw and how these workers are working, how the hell wunna expect Bajan workers with a home to run and light bill to pay, to compete with them for employment?

    Did wunna ask the big maguffie what these men were being paid by any chance and if so, why not share it with the public. After all if these men get hurt will they not end up at the QEH where our taxes support?


  33. This is a VERY SIMPLE case of 21st Century slavery, executed by the identical mentality that fueled the Trans Atlantic version.
    These Money Moguls set up their mega construction deals with compliant authorities, … for hundreds of millions – often of taxpayers’ funds…

    Honest competitors are disadvantaged by red tape, regulations, delays, and harassment. While the Money Moguls (MMs) have their paths greased via such fancy mechanisms as ‘Public/Private sector ventures’, ’trickle down’ arrangements, and ministerial appointments.

    The MMs then seek to maximize profits by:
    – ignoring building standards
    – using the cheapest possible materials
    – sourcing cheap labor – and ignoring local needs and priorities wherever possible
    – moving to mass production technologies that depress local talents and tradition
    – and by bribing anyone who is traitorous enuff to compromise local interests.

    It is not interesting how such ridiculous ‘work permits’ are ROUTINELY granted in HUGE numbers to these slave masters?

    Is it not interesting how our authorities have prevented the legal requirement for building STANDARDS to be implemented, as this would likely require that the imported ‘slaves’ be properly qualified and trained. They would then cost the same – or more, than local workers.
    One wonders how the moguls are able to maintain this scam for so long…

    There is nothing more disgraceful than a country which itself suffered the scourge of slavery for hundreds of years, … then facilitating the exploitation of other hapless souls from less fortunate countries, to line the pockets of albino-centric demons.

    Karma never sleeps, and time is much longer than twine.

    What a place!


  34. […] Source link […]


  35. We did the same to the Guyanese before Guyana struck oil and they returned home. How long has the blogmaster been calling for a structured immigration program? Instead we engaged in political and xenophobic rhetoric.


  36. Minister Gregory Nicholls has been quoted as saying a lot but still said nothing. What would would like to know if how many work permits were issued and in which job categories. The fact that he references a need to strengthen and reform the current process is a warning Sogn that the current system is being taken advantage of.

    No need to amend Constitution

    Minister of Home Affairs and Information Gregory Nicholls has stated that a comprehensive review of the work permit system is under way that includes longer advertising periods, mandatory targeting of young job seekers and more stringent requirements for employers to prove they cannot find suitable Barbadian workers.

    He made the announcement during yesterday’s sitting of the Joint Select Committee on Economic and Productive Sectors on the Immigration Bill, 2026, while insisting that Government did not need to amend the Constitution to reform immigration laws.

    He was responding to a question from representatives of the Barbados Bar Association questioning a business applying for an automotive window tinter work permit.

    Nicholls, in his response, made it clear that public advertisement of a work permit application did not guarantee approval.

    “The placement of an advertisement in the press or in the public domain by any employer is not indicative of the decision given by the Immigration Department on the application. Every application that is publicised is not granted,” he said.

    The minister explained that policy guidance was issued by the ministry based on labour market supply data provided by the Ministry of Labour.

    Discussion

    “We are reviewing how that policy has been working and how it can be streamlined. Only a couple months ago, the Minister of Labour and myself had a discussion and we shared information pertaining to how our regional counterparts and countries within the Commonwealth have been dealing with the work permit situations.”

    Nicholls said the ministry was closely monitoring international developments, particularly recent changes in Canada and the United Kingdom, both of which have introduced significant restrictions on immigration this year, including on work permits and student visas.

    “I’m going to ask the Immigration Department to compile that information so that we can have a look at how the work permit situations are being dealt with in other countries so we can see whether there’s a trend or whether there are changes that are emerging,” he said.

    The minister signalled that Barbados intended to be strategic in adopting international best practices “and the bad things that they have that don’t really work, if we have those bad things, we will also try to amend them in our laws”.

    The minister took direct aim at the phrase “no suitably qualified person found”, which employers routinely use to justify hiring foreign workers.

    Coded language

    “Having found no suitably qualified person, the number of Barbadians who feel that [that is] coded language, that is coded language for something that we all know too well that we really want, that we would remove as a scourge from our nation,” Nicholls said. “But that is the complaint in some sectors in Barbados that when that is used, that is meant to exclude the vast majority of us but we are going to require employers to give a more detailed response to those questions and indeed, I will give the country the assurance that the current system is going to be strengthened. “Some countries have gone the way of targeting recruitment within a specific age cohort, particularly the youth because youth unemployment tends to be higher all over the world than in ordinary unemployment among other working peoples,” Nicholls explained.

    He assured the committee that the overarching goal was to protect Barbadian workers while maintaining a fair and transparent system.

    The most legally significant exchange of the morning centred on the Bar Association’s contention that certain provisions of the Immigration Bill could not be enacted without amending the Constitution. Nicholls was unequivocal in rejecting that argument.

    “It is not the view of the Government that you can only amend immigration laws if the Constitution is changed. We say that from the point of view that the highest law of the land is the Constitution of Barbados. The Constitution of Barbados does not put that prescription in the Constitution that the immigration policy can only be changed in law by way of amendment of the Constitution,” he said.

    While acknowledging the Bar Association’s position as “an honourable sentiment”, Nicholls made it clear it would not derail the legislative process.

    The Bar Association also argued that provisions in the bill concerning the mechanism for granting citizenship were at variance with the Constitution. Nicholls did not dispute that the provisions differed from what was currently in the Constitution, but insisted the variance did not render them void.

    “The Government also understands that a law cannot be at variance with the Constitution but when you say A and say B, you must also look at the thing in its whole. We understand that you can’t be at variance with the Constitution, but while the provisions vary, the variance is not such that would make those provisions void,” he argued,” as he referenced Section (9) of the Constitution.

    “The actual Constitution at Section 9 sets out that Parliament can pass laws to grant citizenship to persons who are not entitled to citizenship under the Constitution. So the very Constitution permits Parliament to do exactly what not only these two bills are doing, but what the existing legislation does,” he said. ( MB)

    Source: Nation


  37. Why the secrecy? Give us the name

    Cou Cou is puzzled by the silence of the tall man when it came to naming and shaming the people behind the big scandal this week.

    Instead, a supposed big expose is expected today in the heart of The City even though by now almost every one is aware of who it is.

    But Cou Cou wants to know why all these people and organisations are now crawling out of the woodwork since the country’s leading media house broke wide open all that was happening to workers and the subhuman conditions under which they were living in this tropical paradise.

    What is puzzling is that nobody seemed to have been checking on these non-nationals once they entered the country, no doubt on work permits.

    The unearthing of their plight seemed to be purely accidental, stumbled upon while checks were being carried out for something else.

    It means someone was not minding the store and what has been happening since the discovery is a shifting of responsibility from one agency to the next.

    As usual, it meant the big boss had to step in and give orders to her people on what must be done and when. The when was immediately. We still do not know why no one had been making these checks and now, in true reactionary style, those in charge are running helter skelter to check on others supposedly in the country under the same contractual terms. However, this scandal has given some of them time to clean up their act, even if temporary.

    It has also given one of the main archrivals of the company at the centre of the scandal much reason to gloat. And we heard gloating, he is.

    It is a hollow gloating about not having such poor conditions for his people.

    However, while that may be so now, what will happen when the examination turns to mentioning of the below liveable wages?

    That is where the smile may be wiped from this rival’s face, mark our words.

    Time longer than twine. But back to our original issue of the refusal to call the name of the offending company.

    Why was the State so reluctant to say who had been committing these atrocious acts against humanity.

    If they could come out with strong words on the matter, they should have the testicular fortitude to name names. If anybody should have been brave enough to call names, it should have been the person who did the calling out.

    Is it a case of showing some sort of favour? We will soon see.

    Source: Nation


  38. “Why was the State so reluctant to say who had been committing these atrocious acts against humanity.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Did Judas EVER say who gave him the 20 pieces of silver…?


  39. The question to be asked in light of the joint statements from the two leaders in the article. Why were the numbers presented by all and sundry without an acknowledgement that there was a workaround in the data collection?

    Technical issues behind arrivals data error

    By Shawn Cumberbatch shawncumberbatch@nationnews.com

    Senior officials involved in the compilation and publication of visitor arrivals data are assuring Barbadians that there is no reason to question the accuracy of the information.

    Chief Immigration Officer Margaret Inniss, and Barbados Statistical Service (BSS) senior statistician Nadia Skeete made that clear yesterday after the BSS recently announced that December 2024 to March 2025 long-stay visitor arrivals were over-estimated by 28 073.

    They were speaking in an exclusive interview at the BSS office in Baobab Tower, Warrens, St Michael.

    “We had technical challenges between the period December 2024 up to March 2025. We’re accustomed giving the Barbados Statistical Service complete data, as such, because of the technical issues it resulted in incomplete data,” Inniss shared.

    “Since then, we’ve corrected those issues, and we’ve been able to supply the Barbados Statistical Service with the correct data from April last year.”

    Skeete added: “Our official source for the data is the Barbados Immigration Department. They break down the information how we want it. We had to use an alternate source, which is used by others to estimate, but not by the Statistical Service, because we have to follow the fundamental principles of official statistics, which means we stick to our official source.

    Length of stay

    “And our official source is the Barbados Immigration Department, but because they had incompleteness in the data, we had to use the alternate source to estimate.”

    Skeete explained that the alternative source “just gives us the number of people who come into the country through the airport”.

    “When we get information from the Barbados Immigration Department, we get purpose of visit, the intended length of stay, the country of residence which also has important implications for lots of things that we do [including] the market shares,” she noted.

    “We get where they’re going to stay, what the type of accommodation is. What we were using to estimate was one flat number.

    “But, of course, with estimates you expect revisions, so when Immigration [Department] provided a bit more complete data, we expected that we were going to revise because . . . they are our official source. So, when they did provide us with better data, we revised, which then gave us the number that we found.”

    Explaining that the BSS usually reviewed all data it received, and made revisions when warranted, Skeete said that having noticed that something was amiss with the December 2024 information, the agency “went on and checked the first quarter of the year”.

    Questions have been raised about why it took the BSS four months to notice an error in the visitor arrivals data.

    Skeete said: “Right now, because we are using our official source [the Immigration Department], this is as accurate and as reliable as we can possibly get. So, I wouldn’t say that there was a delay, it was just [that] we were reviewing.”

    Technical difficulties

    She was also confident that it was accurate because the information which prompted the revised long-stay figures for December 2024 to March 2035 came from the Immigration Department.

    “Please remember that revision is over four months, that’s about 7 000 [visitors] every month,” she said.

    “So, given that we got more information and we’re using Immigration’s data, which is the data we’re accustomed using to corroborate and basically supplement what we would have been using from the alternative source, at this present moment that is the most reliable and most accurate estimate that we can have. So we are confident and comfortable with the number.”

    Skeete and Inniss said cruise arrival numbers were not affected by the technical difficulties.

    They also said efforts would continue between their departments, the Central Bank and Barbados Tourism Market Inc. to ensure the continued accuracy of visitor arrivals data.

    “Over the years we’ve always sat down as a team, sometimes once a week, twice a week, to make sure that in the Immigration Department we are giving them what they want,” Inniss said.

    “We also meet with Central Bank and, as such, we’re doing it as team Barbados to make sure that you can get what you want and that we can collect what you need so that we can be holistic and accurate in supplying complete data.”

    Skeete said, “Of course, should something arise, we would have to make sure that we again note that it might be an estimate, note that a revision will be coming, and try to explain as best [as possible] why it would happen.”

    “And they [Immigration] are modernising their system, so that could only augur well for us with regards to data. They know what our data needs are, and they ensure that we get the data that we want, and once that is happening, everybody’s happy.”

    Source: Nation

  40. I_Love_Barbados Avatar
    I_Love_Barbados

    Anyone with eyes can see Barbados is declining and there are no real corrective actions being done to stop her decline. Many are still only seeing the red flags and not yet discovered the root of Barbados’ problem. But to get to the root will be painful because the corrupt will need to be held accountable… Perhaps Barbadian citizens need to do what Columbia’s leadership has done to those who operate outside law, in Barbados this is not just the street gangsters… in my opinion

    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/colombia-s-president-elect-de-la-espriella-issues-1-month-ultimatum-to-armed-groups/3978289

  41. check your facts and revert back Avatar
    check your facts and revert back

    Did Judas EVER say who gave him the 20 pieces of silver…?

    Please check your facts and revert back*

    (*) Prompts x hints =

    devaluation

    Joseph ben Caiaphas was a Chief High Priest in Jesus’ time


  42. Barbados’ missing bond market

    by RAWDON ADAMS

    and OLIVER JORDAN IN BARBADOS’ financial system, one clear absence stands out: there is no active domestic corporate bond market on the local exchange. Savers earn almost nothing on deposits while companies borrow at five per cent and more.

    Between them lies a market gap – and narrowing it would let more of the nation’s savings finance Barbadian enterprise directly, keeping the capital and its returns at home.

    The gap is visible in the numbers. Central Bank data show the weighted average deposit rate at 0.17 per cent and lending to the private sector at 5.15 per cent – a gap of roughly five points that years of falling rates have not closed. That spread reflects credit risk, operating costs, capital requirements and market structure.

    But the cost hits hardest where there is no listed alternative, leaving the country’s mid-tier firms with fewer options for raising long-term finance. International Monetary Fund analysis of Barbados Revenue Authority’s value added tax data points to 140 firms with annual turnover above $20 million, of which 79 exceed $40 million.

    Although no meaningful listed corporate bond market exists today, a private one does – bonds arranged for a small circle of institutional buyers. Yet evidence of a greater demand exists: the recent Roberts Manufacturing offering showed that ordinary investors will buy a broader range of investment instruments when given the chance.

    A listed market is no cure-all but, over time, could expand savings and funding options – and put some downward pressure on borrowing costs.

    This matters because that gap between what savers earn and what borrowers pay shapes what the next generation inherits.

    The wider it is, the less savers receive and the more enterprise pays to invest, so wealth builds slowly and growth is harder to sustain.

    Concentration is the deeper risk. Most of what Barbadians see as safe to hold is Government paper, and BOSS+, useful as it is, does not change that. The 2018 debt restructuring hit pension assets broadly because institutional portfolios had few domestic alternatives.

    Diversification therefore runs two ways: across the region, and beyond Government debt.

    A broader pool of corporate issuers would not have prevented that shock but would have spread the risk more widely.

    Building that market, and easing those risks, is best begun with a bond the public already knows: the BOSS+. Listing it would not, on its own, create a corporate bond market, but it would give the Barbados Stock Exchange real trading activity and the benchmark that corporate bonds need and could be priced against.

    What stands in the way is not a lack of buyers. A Caribbean Strategic Advisors survey in May, covering pension funds, family offices and wealth managers, found every group to be a net buyer of bonds. The appetite is there but the market is used to the habit of private placement even as it is frustrated by the dearth of non-Government bond opportunities.

    Why, then, has the private bond channel sufficed? Because it is discreet, cheap, familiar and relatively quick to arrange – usually without ratings or extensive disclosure.

    Listing is costlier and more demanding – stronger reporting, clearer governance, legal preparation – and the obstacle, for issuers, is felt mainly as cost and the readiness a public listing requires.

    Yet the gains of a listed corporate bond market – for the company, the saver and the Central Bank – are substantial.

    For the company, a listed bond opens access to a wider investor pool and open pricing. A strong repeat borrower now paying a high bank rate could, in time, raise money more cheaply as its record becomes visible.

    Conversely, a public market may expose risks that were underpriced – but accurate pricing is a virtue.

    For the saver, the advantage is a visible price and the regulatory protection a listed exchange creates.

    Private paper is sold, if at all, by private negotiation; a listed bond can be priced and sold openly, even if liquidity begins modestly. On a small exchange, liquidity will depend on trading participation and dealer support; listing alone will not create it. But without listing, it cannot develop at all.

    For the Central Bank, listing BOSS+ would build on work it has already begun. The bank created BOSS+ and sells it straight to the public, yet the bond itself does not trade openly. Listing it would let savers buy, sell and price it transparently, while giving the bank a market-set reference rate for its own borrowing, and the benchmark a future corporate market would, ideally, price against. Over time, it would also deepen the Exchange and broaden how Government debt is funded.

    Government will remain the dominant borrower, however, and no local corporate market will, on its own, match its supply of debt. So where is a small market to find depth and diversification? The answer is regionally: shared standards across Caribbean exchanges would let Barbadian companies reach wider savings, and local investors deploy their money across the region. Early on, such a market would matter more for transparency and choice than for busy and liquid trading – but that is still worth having. Barbados is too small a market to trade heavily, but regular issues, a regional approach and committed dealers could still create a functioning market.

    The aim should not be to replicate a London or a New York. Rather, it is to build a market sized to its own needs – one that broadens savings options, reduces dependence on bank lending and gives sound companies a public route to capital. Listing the next BOSS+ tranche would be a practical place to begin.

    An economy’s prosperity depends not only on its capacity to consume, but on its ability to convert savings into enterprise.

    This is the financial architecture Barbados has yet to build.

    Rawdon Adams and Oliver Jordan are co-founders and managing directors of Caribbean Strategic Advisors, Inc. which advised Roberts Manufacturing on its recent public offering.

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading