← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Politicians are the same all over the world; The difference is they are accountable and answer to the law and the people in some but answer to no one in others.”

― Peter-Cole C. Onele

The blogmaster, like many, was taken aback by the recent Notice to Develop Land at Graeme Hall, Christ Church. There was an immediate recall of the 2006 proposal to construct a Water Park nearby, which was protested against, and ultimately blocked by the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) government led by the late Owen Arthur.

Barbados has already lost much of its pristine look, and with talk of flyovers, today’s leaders seem hellbent on reshaping Barbados to compete with Monaco. The notion of approving commercial development and a car park in the area of the Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary, designated a Ramsar Wetland, is nothing short of repulsive.

The document Collaboration and Enforcement: The Missing Pieces of the Puzzle in Managing the Graeme Hall Swamp in Barbados confirms that of the 91 acres Wetland and Sanctuary, more than 50 acres are owned by the government.

There is a trend so obvious that, as the saying goes, a blind man on a trotting horse could see it: the Holetown Police Station and the Old Hospital on Bay Street, both handed out to friends feeding at the trough.

Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

40 responses to “Barbados’ Sanctuary sold for concrete”


  1. On the Old Hispital, even at the risk of being again denounced by Bushie for being, as he has said, not his exact words, a minion of Afreximbank, the one at Graeme Hall.seems much more dubious.

    For a regime led by a woe-unto-man who has never tire of mouthing the globalist mantras about the environment, climate change and all the other clichés given her by those in Europe who once pretended to care about such issues, until the Ukraine War, that is, would sell off any and all to balance budgets.

    As a product of the área. A writer, who has spent many a day in Graeme Hall Swamp. It must be said that the área was never been best treated, over decades. This same Mottley regime, and maybe its predecessor as well, has dumped sewage there for years.

    And that’s not the all of it.

    Maybe we all must be made to wait on the divine judgement of The Great Mother when hearts are weighed and found heavier than a feather. For example, our collective invitations to category five, and maybe higher, hurricanes are the direct responses of Pachamama!


  2. This government promised so much in terms of governance with a difference. However it seem public opinion or concerns do not matter and to offer an alternative you are labeled as a troublemaker or anti government. We have become a country where you are handsomely rewarded with an honor, business deals, social invites for blind loyalty.

    I had breakfast some years ago with a former head of a law enforcement of a US agency and what he expressed for Caribbean countries and Barbados was not surprising. All I will say is politicians are the root cause of most of the social decay. Many are not brave to set foot in any US territory for the US knows every financial transaction made, emails sent, WhatsApp/Signal and Telegram message sent. Washington patience is a long game never hasty.

    Sadly, nothing will change politically unless independent candidates become part of parliament. Sending subliminal messages seem not to be working in influencing behavioral change all it seems to do is increase data storage, disgust and cussing.


  3. So reading this the concern is that a commitment is needed from government that the land in the swamp they own will never be developed or sold, or in anyway differ from what is now there. Unless this is FORMALLY done then from our experience with how other state land was sold and even given away, anything sadly could happen here.

    Is there such a method of protecting this land even available to us? I mean based on the pass one could argue that we are asking the state here to protect us from the state. After the Bay Street issue where a large track was given away without the consent of us its owners, one gets the impression that anything is possible and nothing is safe from ” the need for for future investment.”


  4. @John A

    Is it unreasonable to think that this is an area that could be used for ecotourism since we are totally committed to a one sector economy? What are we doing!


  5. @ David

    There was a time when I would say ‘ noway this would ever happen” but the past has taught me anything can happen nowadays. The Holetown event was my eye opener, followed then by the Bay Street giveaway. There really is nothing left that would surprise me now.

    The piece of Holetown land was a place used by many Bajans and a area where one could launch a boat or jetski from. There were cars that came there from many parishes to acces this west coast beach. Let’s not even discuss the historic importance of the area. Point is that was one of the last public access to a swimming area that one could drive up to on the west coast.


  6. Everyone of them wants to be like Trump… !
    Is it the same underlying motivation…?

    -Always looking for a ‘deal’, and are principally driven by the benefits to themselves and to their families.
    -ZERO consideration to the impact on future generations – as long as THEIR grandchildren are rich enuff to get through…
    -No concern for the environment …not when there is money to be made…
    -No bother about repayment, once there is money available NOW to spend
    -No PLANNING for the future – just selfish NOW gratification
    -Little acknowledgement of past patriots – self-aggrandizement is the focus
    -No interest on the poor. In fact these are their VERY best loyal supporters.
    -No moral compass… NONE at all!!

    What a state!
    What a place!


  7. In the 60s Discovery Bay hotel was built on the Holetown Swamp.

    Now this.

    ” The west coast is also seeing significant activity. Blue Diamond Resorts is advancing its adults-only, all-inclusive concept, Royalton Royalty Investments, described by Griffith as “the one and only,” with an opening date set for July 1. Featuring 222 suites and multiple restaurants and bars, it is expected to bolster Barbados’ position in the premium all-inclusive market.”


  8. @Hants

    Have we arrested the flooding in that area?


  9. @Kammie

    Nature has a way of hitting back.


  10. @ David,

    I hope that the maguffees in the relevant Government departments have a plan.


  11. What I am noticing here and on other blogs, is a fear by our people that nothing is untouchable. They seem to be just waiting to hear what will be the next national piece of our silver that will be developed. Does everything on Bim now have a price tag on it in other words?

    I understand the need for development, but it can not be a case of “all is for sale.” If we want the young people to feel part of Barbados, what can we guarantee that will be there for them in years to come? I am not making excuses for many of the wayward young people, so don’t get me wrong. What I am saying however is are we creating a sense of exclusion in them where they ask themselves ” what really is guaranteed for us?” Are we creating a sense of despair in them that confirms their claims of ” dem ain’t nothing here for we?”

    It may well be time that the remaining state owned natural lands, inclusive of beach front lands and historic areas, be ALL designated state park lands excluded from any form of development.


  12. There is hope for young people.

    “With Government’s vision firmly set on making Barbados the number one education system in the world within the next seven years, Minister of Educational Transformation Chad Blackman says the proposed infrastructural, curricula, and technological advancements are paramount.”

    https://nationnews.com/2025/12/11/plan-to-give-children-best-global-chance-at-success/


  13. she ranks No. 99 among the globe’s most influential political, business, and philanthropic leaders.

  14. Christopher Worme Avatar
    Christopher Worme

    What is the issue here David? Have any of the usual commentary clowns taken the opportunity to visit the site and read the actual sign?

    It appears to me that Graeme Hall Nature Park is just building a new car park. Has anyone been in Graeme Hall Nature Park since it reopened? I have, and on Independence bank holiday Monday it is said they had over 1,800 visitors. The park is so busy that on many weekends their car park is full to capacity and also the one across the road on the beach.

    It seems simple to me; they need more car park space. The clowns don’t read; just type and talk shite all the time.


  15. “…she ranks No. 99 among the globe’s most influential political, business, and philanthropic leaders.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Is this a good thing in a world where Trump is ranked no. 1 and people like Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Tony Blair are high flyers?

    Shiite!
    Wuh this is like being a top dog in Hell.

    No wonder Bushie is a little stinking shiite hound in the rankings…
    LOL
    ha ha ha


  16. @Christipher Worme

    Is it that simple? The blogmaster and many here have a problem with how this wetland and surrounding area is being developed. As we do for wider Barbados.


  17. @Chris Worme

    What the non party faithfuls are saying here if you bothered to read the comments, is their concern about the 58% of the area owned by the state that DOES NOT FORM part of the wetland owned at this time by Mr. Dasilva. In other words the 58% that is owned by the state, similar to how the Holetown Police Station and Old District Hospital was once state owned.

    Is this 58% State owned wetlands going to be declared a National Park, or will it remain open game for developers? It really is not a difficult concern to have, based on the flippant way we dispose of scarce state assets.


  18. Wait! Wunnuh very polite. Polite as shite! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


  19. @ Donna

    You too bad! LOL


  20. John A,

    I know.


  21. The folks here are not interested in facts. They thrive on misinformation, disinformation and innuendo.

    Hear this gem by the blogmaster “The notion of approving commercial development and a car park in the area of the Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary, designated a Ramsar Wetland, is nothing short of repulsive.” He can’t say on the wetlands so resorts to “in the area”.🤣

    The joke is that apart from the eastern side, Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary is currently surrounded by commercial development– 6 Mix, Republic Bank, Little Caesars etc and housing up in Rendezvous. In fact one of the lots in the notice is and has been occupied by a WHOLE house facing Worthing Main Road for decades. The other one i think is already used for parking and ancillary support for the operation of GHS. It seems combining the two is to facilitate more parking.

    The notice is quite clear, the sanctuary will remain as is and the two other lots joined. But BUI loves commess and its members driven by egos larger than the whole swamp.


  22. Christ Church South


  23. We are well on the way with our Monaco styled economy. Well done!

    Barbados on brink of ‘room boom’

    Barbados is on the brink of one of its most significant expansions in hotel accommodation in decades, with hundreds of new rooms set to come on stream and more than US$1 billion in luxury developments progressing across the island.

    Senior Minister in charge of Infrastructure Projects and Town Planning Matters, Dr William Duguid, said the outlook for Barbados’ hotel plant was bright as several major projects continued to move steadily through construction.

    “These projects are progressing well and we monitor them regularly to see if any issues crop up. We try to facilitate, both with respect to utilities and of course, the planning permissions, building starts and all of the regulatory agencies, so that we can get the projects moving as quickly as possible without any hindrance to them coming to a conclusion.

    Bright future

    “I think the future is bright. There’s tremendous confidence in Barbados and it continues to grow. We look forward to even more properties coming on stream,” he said.

    His optimism was shared by Barbados Hotel and Tourism Association (BHTA) chairman Javon Griffith, who told members during the association’s fourth quarterly general meeting last Wednesday that the island was entering an unprecedented period of tourism investment.

    He said the numerous new hotel and related real estate developments represented “well over” US$1 billion, bringing with them hundreds of rooms, thousands of jobs and “tremendous” economic stimulus.

    “Across the length and breadth of our island, major projects are taking shape. Projects which will redefine our accommodation landscape and strengthen our competitiveness over the next three years.

    “This development cycle is an extraordinary opportunity for Barbados. It signals confidence; it signals momentum; and it challenges us as an industry and as a nation to rise to meet the moment,” he said.

    Both Duguid and Griffith highlighted several flagship investments.

    Duguid said the $300 million Pendry Barbados Hotels & Resorts and Pendry Residences under construction at Six Men’s, St Peter, were at “an advanced stage”, with no issues reported to his ministry. He said he could not specify the exact completion date, only that it was expected to be next year.

    Griffith said that Pendry, along with the boutique Blue Monkey Hotel, formed part of a cluster of high-end projects set to open between 2026 and 2027, helping to cement Barbados’ status as a destination for discerning global travellers.

    On the South Coast, the more than $100 million Hotel Indigo in Hastings, Christ Church, is nearing completion and expected to open next month.

    Duguid confirmed the project was “essentially complete” and that operators were now focused on ramping up for opening.

    Griffith described Hotel Indigo as marking the return of the InterContinental Hotels Group to Barbados, which added a level of diversity and brought renewed energy to “an already bustling tourism corridor”.

    Adults-only

    In Holetown, St James, Duguid said preparations were under way for the opening of the $300 million adults-only Royalton Vessence Barbados.

    “We’ve had a meeting with them recently and they’re in preparation now to meet all their regulatory commitments in terms of the various compliance and health requirements to then get their certificates in place.

    “They have one or two issues that I wouldn’t want to speak about right now, but they are making very good progress. They’ve already started putting furniture in one of the four blocks and they’re progressing well,” he said.

    Griffith said the resort, scheduled to open July 1, would strengthen Barbados’ position in the premium all-inclusive market.

    A transformative mega-project is also advancing in Heywoods, St Peter, where the $800 million Sandals Beaches is set to rise on the former Almond Beach Resort site.

    “They’ve cleared their land and they’ve done some geo-technical work and they’re looking to start the foundation and then the verticals after that. It will be a tremendous investment, and we are very anxious to see it start and then come to fruition,” Duguid said.

    Griffith said Beaches “would support yearround airlift, create substantial employment and deepen our appeal to multigenerational travellers”.

    Another multimilliondollar project, the $186 million Hyatt Ziva on Lower Bay Street, St Michael, remains in the pipeline.

    Duguid declined to comment, saying he “could not say anything” about the development.

    Griffith, however, said Hyatt would bring renewed vitality to Carlisle Bay and contribute significantly to the ongoing revitalisation of Bridgetown.

    International brands

    Griffith added that international brands already operating in Barbados were also reinvesting heavily.

    Marriott International is undertaking widescale refurbishments, with phased reopenings continuing into mid-2026.

    Renovations are also under way at Crystal Cove (88 rooms) and Turtle Beach (162 rooms) with both to tentatively reopen in 2026. Colony Club just reopened, offering 96 freshly renovated guest rooms and suites.

    Source: Nation


  24. A closer look at country’s debt

    This article was written and submitted by Anthony P. Wood a former minister in the Owen Arthur administration.

    An article entitled $407M To Resolve Insurance Matters,

    in the Midweek Nation of December 10, 2025, reported that Minister in the Ministry of Finance Ryan Straughn revealed the current Government borrowed $7.341 billion and repaid $9.643 billion since taking office seven and a half years ago.

    Such a revelation aroused my interest since I have been closely monitoring and commenting on the borrowing and debt management policies of the Government.

    An important observation is that the borrowing amount is understated. During the presentation of the 2025 Budgetary Proposals and Financial Statement, Minister Straughn provided a schedule

    (Page 21) which indicated that between June 2018 and March 2025, the Government borrowed $7.264 billion and repaid $7.370 billion.

    When the actual repayment of $2.205 billion replaces the provisional figure of $1.836 billion for the 2024-2025 financial year, the repayment amount increases to $7.735 billion over the period.

    It is unfortunate that whereas total repayments include debt service (principal repayments and interest payments) for the current financial year beginning April 1, 2025, the corresponding amount for borrowing during the period is excluded. That is, unlike the repayments, the borrowing figure has not been updated beyond the Budget presentation.

    Available evidence indicates that the Government has borrowed close to $1.9 billion for the financial year and is on course to reach a record level of $2 billion for the 12 months ending March 31, 2026.

    It is important to explain an aspect of debt analysis for the public’s benefit. The level of Government debt is a stock variable and is defined as the total outstanding principal owed by the Government at a specific point in time. The principal is the amount of money borrowed or the outstanding balance of the loan.

    Two instances

    The debt stock typically does not include interest payments associated with the debt. Interest cost is included in the debt stock in two instances.

    First, when interest payments are in arrears and, second, when capitalised interest arises with a renegotiated/ reorganised debt agreement.

    Conversely, debt service is the amount of money paid over a specified period, usually a year, which includes principal repayments (amortisation) and interest payments.

    Based on the above key definitions, it is easy to understand and appreciate that the Government’s debt repayments exceeding borrowing over a specific period does not necessarily translate into a declining debt stock.

    This results from the inclusion of interest payments in debt repayments. This situation applies to the Barbadian experience. At the conclusion of the debt restructuring/ default exercise in late 2018, the debt level declined precipitously from $15.84 billion to around $11.7 billion. However, despite repayments of $9.643 billion over the past seven and a half years, the Government’s voracious appetite for borrowing resulted in the debt level increasing to approximately $15 billion at September 30, 2025.

    This means that net borrowing (gross borrowing minus principal repayments or amortisation) was $3.3 billion over the period.

    The Government’s voracious appetite for borrowing resulted in the debt level increasing to approximately $15 billion at September 30, 2025

    Source: Nation


  25. @ Enuff
    “…The folks here are not interested in facts.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Facts:
    – $60 million gone with a HOPELESS housing scam… NO reports, NO accountability; blatant LIES from the PM about an ‘investigation’. …and yet, the KNOWN perps continue with EVEN BIGGER projects.

    – A STEAL housing mess-up costing tens of millions, and then going $50 million OVER BUDGET – with piss poor results. Yet…NOTHING to report!!

    – An INTERNATIONAL scandal with a failed, radical, vaccine scam – that conspired to RIP OFF Bajans for millions of dollars – NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!

    – $7,500 bribes labeled as ‘political contribution’ is business as usual -just like Dumbville’s insurance escapade was ‘normal’ in Brassbados.

    KEY FACTS:
    Not a shiite works satisfactorily !!!
    -Agriculture
    -Education
    -Transportation / potholes / traffic mess
    -Health / QEH / Polyclinics
    -Law courts
    -Crime
    -Sewage / garbage
    -BWA
    -Electricity /energy

    Cuh Shiite Enuff
    GIVE US SOME ANSWERS on these OUTSTANDING FACTS, and perhaps we would care about your excuses for seeking to sell off the last wetlands to your mafia buddies.

    Perhaps if the PM did not so blatantly lie about
    -providing answers to the HOPE mess,
    -having the TINT rules EXCLUDING HER and other big-ups,
    -coming up with a Housing plan that makes sense (and appointing a LARGE committee)… then doing NOTHING!!!

    …We may even believe her current ‘commitment’ to account for every cent of the SLUSH FUND that is currently being legislated just in time for the upcoming election.

    What a damned place!
    …and what GALL …for Enuff to accuse Bajans of avoiding ‘facts’….

    Steupsss
    Looka …Piss in the blogmaster’s pocket do… (Not in stinking Bushie’s…)


  26. @Bush Tea

    Enuff needs to attack the other commentators published in the traditional media as well. Could it be they do not have the facts? Also there is today’s SUN editorial, all points reportedly and repetitively posted here.

    Free education

    By Professor Sir Errol Walrond The recent news about the Minister of Educational Transformation sending letters to parents about the cost of their child’s education with a zero balance is as innocent as a tiger appearing in your yard with a sign hung around its neck saying “CAT”.

    Barbados was once described by a secretary general of the United Nations as punching above its weight and recently a five-term prime minister in the Caribbean commented on the “Idea of Barbados”.

    Let me respectfully suggest that both comments derive from the performance of the people in the milieu of three generations of “free” education and health services.

    Nevertheless, we are swimming in an ocean of debt where our “bankers” do not feel that we should be able to afford the “luxury” of human development for all. After all, the economic philosophy of a banker is one based on there must be a profit, and that is based in all human history on maintaining an undereducated underclass.

    Over the years we have had Ministers of Education and leaders in education who have voted for the system with their feet by sending their children to private schools rather than to the “free” public schools over which they preside.

    We have seen the beneficiaries of our “free” system move onto universities in other countries and voluntarily contribute to the funding of those institutions as past students while lending little or no support to the “free” institutions responsible for their educational foundation.

    In other words, they demonstrate that the “free” system is taken for granted by many of its beneficiaries because they have never known its worth. However, putting a zero at the bottom of a balance sheet only states that no “dividend” will be paid. It does not state what the board of directors intends to do next year, when there may be a loss declared on the balance sheet but the directors will not be paid less. In fact, some – like in the great financial crisis of 2007 – may even pay themselves more.

    Age-appropriate figures There is a good case to be made that the cost of our “free” education and health services is not appreciated by many of its consumers and that there is a need for the beneficiaries [parents as well as children] to be educated on the matter.

    This should be done first and foremost by educating the students in class using age-appropriate figures which show the costs and where the money actually goes.

    I am not aware what figures were used or are to be used in the ministry’s letter to parents, but I would be surprised if the minister and ministry’s cost were included.

    Such a balance sheet should also include where the revenue is collected from and should show how each household contributes to our so-called “free” education.

    Now is not the time to roll the wicket and break it up to make it fertile ground for the spin bowlers from the International Monetary Fund or elsewhere.

    What we need is a readable balance sheet that shows the good, the bad and the ugly of financing our essential, free-at-the-point-ofdelivery education service – a service which, in the opinion of the country, for over three generations has also included “free” health services.

    Such a balance sheet should show how the dollar earned and spent by the least fortunate among us contributes to the services enjoyed by the more fortunate among us.

    Source: Nation


  27. @ David
    “Enuff needs to attack the other commentators published in the traditional media as well.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Enuff is a boss!
    Unable to counter the likes of Tricia Watson, Prof Howard, Anthony Wood, and other CLEARLY QUALIFIED, intelligent, articulate, and patriotic commentators, the BLP apologists prefer to react emotionally to anonymous BU bloggers like little stinking Bushie…

    It makes no sense..
    – cause Enuff was recently making the point that ‘no one take the BUI seriously’ and hence we could talk chalk….

    On the OTHER hand, Tricia, Howard and Wood are taken VERY SERIOUSLY by thousands of Bajans – and yet we cannot hear any coherent responses to THEIR accusations …

    Ent dat passing strange..??!!

    Owen once suggested to the now PM that she WRITE DOWN her speeches and have someone review them BEFORE she goes on parade…
    He had a reason…
    This emotional appeal to patriotism about giving MILLIONS to foreigners in exchange for ‘jobs for Bajans’ rings HOLLOW in the face of all the other shiite we are seeing from her – with:
    -free movement to take away local job opportunities
    -secret electricity deals
    -PUBLIC lands in Holetown handed to Canadian money men
    -PUBLIC lands in Bay Street GIFTED to African money men

    Whoever is ACTUALLY running Barbados CLEARLY do NOT have the best interest of LOCALS at heart…
    Nothing shows this up better than the Sugar deal mess with cooperatives and sugar industry workers… That was a no-brainer.

    What a Cartel!
    What a place!


  28. Maybe I was born yesterday. However, I always believed that once a nation becomes a republic that It prioritises the ownership of land as being number one on its agenda. Who would have believed that this republic under Mia’s rule would be handing out land to Mr Tom, Mr Dick and Mr Harry like we were blessed with surplus land in abundance.

    Someone needs to interrogate Mia and ask her some frank questions. She needs to spell out clearly her meaning of the word republic. I don’t think she has a bloody clue what the word means.

    This prime minister is taking her population back to the fuedal era.


  29. @Bush Tea

    Are is another academic.

    “I read the response by the PM of Tricia Watson’s concerns as carried in the popular press.

    Respectfully, I am not responding on the basis of impressions or assertions but as someone whose career and vocation align with germane aspects of what is under discussion.

    A Parliamentary Bill seeking to address economic diversification through the inventivisation of foreign investment is normally anchored by an industrial policy. This Bill that neither makes mention of inventions, value-added intentions, innovation-mediated emphases nor delineates those sectors targeted for capital deepening or related initiatives – is not addressing the task for which the Bill is so named.

    It seems based on the PM’s response that the Bill is about rightsizing rates of tax for foreign companies seeking to invest in the Barbados economy. The governance and accountability of the intended expenditures are of relevance, and the PM reminds of the key oversight roles of the Auditor-General and the like. My concerns are along a different but similarly important tack.

    The major inflows of inward investment in Barbados over the past 30 or so years have not led to economic diversification. Rather, it has reinforced the commercial dealing character of our economy. The bulk of foreign direct investment has been in real estate prospecting and along import distribution lines. To be sure, there are some foreign exchange and employment benefits as we bear witness to an increase in hotel room capacity, and with construction, there are spikes in employment. Ultimately, the hospitality and construction sectors also hit our foreign reserves hard as we import all the components to complete the respective projects and for maintenance. So, the urgent task has long been to push past the limited diversification that our economy reflects.

    Monies drawn from the Consolidated Fund, once targeted at economic development, are deployed in various ways but without reference to any class of investor, local or foreign. We have been investing in the modernizing of infrastructure to woo or attract investment along the Harbour Road, Newton, Six Roads, and so on. These industrial parks have for some time have been operating under the aegis of the BIDC amd local and foreign businesses take up rents at various rates depending on the nature and scale of the enterprise and whether the business redounds to design, manufacture or commercial benefit of the country.

    I would think, therefore, that the adjustment in rates of tax can be accommodated in a Bill or in amendments of existing legislation addressing how we engage with international business companies. We have already completed the heavy lifting with respect to ending the differential tax rate between the local corporate tax rate and what we levied on international business companies in our international financial sector.

    It is an unnecessary conflation of the two issues – tax rate adjustment for international business – and inventivising economic diversification in Barbados. The latter will not turn on the issue of tax rates but on state posture. That is, the relationships and bargains struck with foreign and local investors, the capacity of the various line Ministries, popular buy-in across civil society, and the capacity of the Government to steer investment in the required sectors. More can be said.

    Don D. Marshall”


  30. Surely Dr Marshall is astute enuff to recognize the PM’s economic limitations.

    Combine this obvious shortcoming with a dictatorial leadership style, and it is not difficult to see how someone could be influenced by the wealthy albino-centrics whom she admires.
    Trying to teach her Economics 101 is a waste of time now…

    It is really for persons such as himself to join their voices with that of Ms Watson who has blazed a trail in regulatory matters – and especially in representing the PUBLIC interests… by PUBLICLY setting out a SENSIBLE ECONOMIC PLAN for Barbados and putting the political clowns on the back foot…

    It is about time that Cave Hill does something useful to counteract the serious damage inflicted by Sir Cave Hilary last 30 years…

    What a place!


  31. David – Sir I debunk falsehoods, I don’t attack individuals or opinions even if known opponents of the government. Dr.Marshall should share his industrial policy from his time as Chairman of BIDC under the last DLP government. I await the condos on the Graeme Hall Sanctuary as announced by the BUI.

    Bushie – You’re shameless eh! All of a sudden Marshall from de hill is astute. Talk about being a hypocrite and convenient. All if a sudden you’re easily impressed by those on de hill. But then again fixing the roads and bridges for Bajans in the Scotland District is a waste of money according to you. MAM come through with the quasi-SWF do.


  32. @Enuff

    How many initiatives the government rolled back that you supported in original form?


  33. LOL @ Enuff
    Bushie said ‘ASTUTE ENUFF…’
    Don’t be simple …like with your childish references to having to beg Chinese to come and fix potholes in St Joseph…in 2025?… Have we NO BB SHAME…?

    How astute does ANYONE need to be, to recognize endemic economic FAILURE?
    Your emotional responses betray your otherwise focused (if flawed) contributions.

    Even Cuhdear Bajan, who produces valuable gems from time to time – especially of the conkie variety, is astute enuff… so why not Dr Marshall

    As to the ‘quazi-SWF’,
    We ALL know how important this will be to BLP electioneering in 2026.
    A lotta bribes will be needed in order to keep the brass bowls bewitched, cause after 8 years of giving wunna de vote and watching MAM, the poor BBs only seeing Hell…and growing DEBTS…

    You sure that $75 million will be Enuff for 2026?
    LOL
    ha ha ha
    What a place!!!

    BTW
    While you ‘await the condos on the Graeme Hall Sanctuary as announced by the BUI’, Bushie awaits the PROMISED reports on the NISSS, HOPE, STEAL Housing and BWA…
    Transport Board can wait until the system crashes into total gridlock…


  34. David
    All, because I am not seeking votes or attention. How many have you opposed whether rolled back or not? Don’t blame me if you only hear of RAMSAR but don’t understand how development around urban wetlands can co-exist. Or don’t know of the plenty agrivoltaics projects all bout Bim or the electrification of industry or BPI etc.


  35. Bushie
    Lol @”astute enuff”. Counsel rests.


  36. I still waiting for Enuf to announce that the 58% of the Wetlands owned by the state will be placed in eternal safety as a national park, thereby guaranteeing it will be as Barclays Park and others are.

    Don’t let us dwell on the application that is within the 42% forming the sanctuary, it is the future of the 58% currently owned by the state that is not protected by sanctuary status that we want to secure a future for. A future that does not included concrete stone and cement blocks.


  37. @enuff, very well.


  38. John A,

    Indeed., yuh “clown that does not read”!

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading