← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

There is the valid argument that Barbados cannot afford the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) to win another 30–0 general election. It must be about ensuring our already cannibalized Westminster system functions at some efficient level. In our model of government, the dissenting voice of an opposition is an important constitutional check and balance. It is necessary to scrutinize legislation. It is also needed to demand transparency from the government side. If the BLP wins 30-0 again, we will be left with one sided debates. Select committees will operate without dissenting views. This outcome would not align with how the framers designed the system to function. Some commentators have expressed the view that there are other channels outside of parliament that support opposing views to be represented.

Already Prime Minister Mia Mottley has been labeled a de facto dictator. This is because of the BLP’s dominance at the polls in 2018 and 2022. The dilemma facing the citizenry is that we do not vote for an opposition. Generally political opposition parties promote issues affecting the country, and offer alternatives to win favour with the electorate. The party on the government side does the opposite. It promotes accomplishments with promises to continue the same. However, in Barbados, we have a nuanced situation. Confidence in the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) is low because of the two heavy defeats. And there have been subsequent unflattering events that occurred at George Street. The blogmaster is of the view the upcoming general election is about whether the public has sufficient confidence in the DLP to deserve to be returned to government.

There is good reason why cynicism and voter apathy is believed to have taken deep root in Barbados. When a significant number of voters feel their voice is like that of John De Baptist” crying in the wilderness, our type of democracy has become dysfunctional. If a democratic government, as explained by Abraham Lincoln, is to be “a government of the people, by the people, for the people” – another DLP shellacking at the polls will not be of value to facilitating a healthy democracy.

For Barbados to thrive, we have to find a path. We must ensure that a single political party does not monopolise the halls of parliament. It would not bode well for a healthy democracy. What a pickle Barbados now finds itself. A small, predominantly Black country that used to be the doyen of the region, held up as a model for others to follow.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

66 responses to “Can Barbados survive another 30 love?”


  1. Hinds obviously is a conservator of the petite bourgoise ‘democracy’, the status quo.

    For to deal with a matter of such import by relying on dated emotional triggers is generally unhelpful and does not make contact with the central failings of her socalled representative democracy.

    For a country which has serially tried to use voting to impact “governance”, and failing at every turn, it has surely long become a truism that voting changes nothing, and if it did it would have long been illegal. More fundamentally, that this system has long past it usefulness, if it ever has any.

    But instead of addressing structural problems, Hinds has opted to attempt extending the life of a dead or dying system.

    Pachamama
    President, None of the Above Party. The Party of Non-Voters. The Party for the Militarization of Government.


  2. Boss… Amazing..
    When do you get the time to find all these posts …
    …and still keep up with all the other shiite going on? 🙂

    Good video!
    Good to see a young person that seems to be thinking for herself…

    Everything she says is true…
    …Except that Bushie thinks that the BLP would make the better ‘opposition’
    – since they would know where all the skeletons are hidden,
    and be well placed to keep the new government in check…
    LOL

    LOL … What a place!
    Have you seen the current state of Sport?
    -No stadium
    -No Gymnasium (under major repair AGAIN)
    -No netball stadium
    -No Beach volleyball stadium – in abeyance…
    -School sports at the same level as the 1970’s
    -Is there a minister? …A Sports Council? …A BOA? …A sports lottery?
    Our POOR children!

    Did the PM call elections early to get rid of jokers..?


  3. Pacha says…
    “Bushie …Maybe your appeal for realism is best self-directed.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Answered LONG ago, …and repeated OVER and OVER!

    1 – Realism is SPIRITUAL.
    2 – Bushie is aligned with this realism through adoption… Not via ability, hard work, inheritance or intelligence.
    LOL – perhaps just being in the right place at the right time…!?

    This shiite called Project ‘Life-on-Earth’ is NOTHING more than a TEMPORARY pilot project, designed to REFINE certain SPIRITUAL qualities that will be needed for the REAL DEAL.

    THEREFORE, while it may be useful and even fun, to analyze, participate, and even to fret, …about our myriad of ‘cauldron’ problems, the REAL ISSUE (Realism) is NOT what you perceive it to be…
    It is about refining ’The whole Armor of God’ …
    (You won’t know what that is – cause you avoid certain types of research – so ask Terence. LOL)

    Essentially…
    What shall it profit a BB to be 100% successful in a pilot project – only to miss the fundamental INTENT of the REAL PERMANENT OBJECTIVE?

    … but that question has been put already by a previous bush man…
    LOL
    ha ha ha
    What an interesting point in the pilot project…!


  4. Bushman ”TEMPORARY pilot project, designed to REFINE certain SPIRITUAL qualities that will be needed for the REAL DEAL.”

    You know, I believe you are on to something.

    A colleague and I were discussing the ‘realities’ this morning and she said that when her brother was three, he went with his mother to a friends in another country.

    On entering a room, the little fellow said ‘that was not here before’, looking at something. The mother told him that he had never been there before, however, he insisted, convincingly, that he had and ‘that was not here before”.

    There is a lot more to this thing than I would deign to profess on.

    I will leave that to experts like yourself.

    Perhaps we need to ask for help from the ‘real real’ powers that be.


  5. Why was the DLP so on the backfoot? This should have been foreseen.

    The DLP didn’t even have the needed posters printed.


  6. Who the Hell prints ‘posters’ … in an age of TicToc and ON-LINE chats?
    This all just goes to show the LEVEL of thinking of our BB politicians … and of their mendicant BB minions.

    How about the damn candidates get their donkeys on BRASS TACKS …and discuss issues WITH THE PUBLIC, …that WE the public want to have discussed…?
    Instead of de lotta ugly posters holding on to Mia’s scarfs?

    ‘Posters shiite’
    …Sreupsss, get behind Bushie’s old donkey do!!

    @ Horsemeat
    Bushie has it on the GREATEST POSSIBLE authority that this experience we call “life on Earth” – is nothing but a pilot project that is akin to a macro spiritual “character refinement process”.

    All the lotta associated materialistic shiite only serves the purpose of providing the required training resources…. the fuel for the cauldron, so to speak….

    It will all become pellucidly clear to all, sundry, (and even to Pacha) shortly…

    What a time (and place) to be alive…!


  7. @Chris

    The DLP as you know had its issue with the Thorne vs Yearwood rumble. Also Thorne has been pushing the narrative that the update to the electoral list is incomplete, therefore holding an election is previous.


  8. @David et al.

    OK. I hear what you are saying.

    But, to share, I have been trying to bring up an issue of speeding vehicles in my neighbourhood. Some cars and trucks traveling at more than 60 km/h racing by my home.

    Minister Symmonds and a team of six showed up at my home unannounced a few weeks ago.

    They promised to fix things.

    So far, nothing has been fixed.


  9. @David et al.

    Just to add… I know some of the people at EBC. They are very serious people.

    They take their responsibily very seriously, and are undervalued.

    Want an audit? Bring it on.


  10. @Chris

    We have to appraise based on performance. Were voters incorrectly deleted? Were people seeking to get on the list via change forms not updated timely? Etc.


  11. @Bushy

    “Who the Hell prints ‘posters’ … in an age of TicToc and ON-LINE chats?

    Targeting old people. Or those smart enough to not engage with social media.


  12. I have been posting, but nothing is showing up.

    This is a test. Deal with it.


  13. @David: “We have to appraise based on performance.

    I completely agree.

    As a Bajan who was born in Canada, I can’t be more proud of those who stand up to bullies.


  14. […] (see Dr. Kristina Hinds’ article) obviously is a conservator of the petite bourgoise ‘democracy’, the status […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading