← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Prime Minister Mia Mottley continues to be committed to an aggressive international agenda which requires significant air travel to attend meetings and engage in meet and greets. Her latest stop Nassau in the Bahamas to attend the Annual Meeting and the AfriCaribbean Trade and Investment Forum in Nassau.

While the Prime Minister is busy growing her international image, and we offer congratulations, her promise to intercede in the Savvy on the Bay matter remains one for fools.

Minister of Finance
The Honourable Prime Minister Mia Mottley

But what I will say to you now is that I have said to the two gentlemen, ‘you have a timeline on these negotiations, and if these negotiations don’t finish within the next few weeks, there must be a ministerial statement to the Parliament and all of the facts laid bare, including how this matter started under the last government; why there was a need to go to court under the last government; how, therefore, the sale was proceeded with as a result of an act of specific performance; and why we would not have been able to act before when we said from the very beginning, those two lots in the middle were always car parks’,” the Prime Minister [Mia Mottley] explained.

Barbados Today (26 August 2023)

Today the traditional media has reported on a flare up between the management of Savvy on the Bay and the adjoining business Copacabana which required Minister of Transport and Works and Acting Prime Minister Santia Bradshaw to intervene. The tension between Savvy on the Bay and Copacabana has been reported many times in the BU space. What is obvious is that the Savvy on the Bay matter needs to be brought to a resolution – Prime Mottley agrees given her public pronouncement on the matter in August 2023 – however, there appears to be an effort to keep the matter in abeyance.

At the root of the dispute yesterday is a pipe running across Savvy land which was allegedly tampered with to divert water from Copacabana the adjacent property.

How long will Prime Minister Mia Mottley allow this matter to bubble? Instead scarce resources must be wasted with the Acting Prime Minister and minister in an already large Cabinet having to waste taxpayers dollars negotiating with an operator of a government excavator, not to mention the many other government officials present at the dispute. What are we doing?


See today’s Nation newspaper article.

Santia steps in at Savvy stand-off

By Carlos Atwell

carlosatwell@nationnews.com

Tempers flared at Savvy on the Bay yesterday as action by the Ministry of Transport and Works (MTW) agitated longstanding issues between management at the business and next-door neighbour Copacabana.

The matter lasted for several hours at the Bay Street, St Michael location until Minister of Transport and Works Santia Bradshaw arrived and presided over a compromise.

When the Weekend Nation arrived, an irate Sarah Taylor, the spokesman for Savvy, was upset personnel from the MTW’s Drainage Division were on their property to clear a blocked water pipe which was supposed to take water from areas such as Wellington Street and Nelson Street to the sea.

“Having MTW here digging on our property without just cause is crazy. Do we not have any rights? If there is a problem, meet with people first. It is so heart-breaking to try and do your best for your country by investing and how are you treated? Like your property is worth nothing. How is that fair?” she asked.

Taylor said she saw the excavator digging when she arrived on the property and after not receiving an answer to what they were doing, she stood in front of the excavator, blocking their progress. She said she then called for Bradshaw and Member of Parliament for The City, Corey Lane, as well as the police.

Members of the Town Planning Department and Kinch himself soon arrived on the scene. Kinch said the pipe was originally running through Lewis Gap but charged that it was diverted.

“I have no objection to Government building a drain across my boundary but no one should be able to dump water on another’s land so I blocked it up,” he said.

Blocked drain

Bradshaw arrived and spoke to the parties involved after which she told the media: “The Drainage Unit of the MTW responded to a report of a blocked drainage area which is responsible for bringing water from a lot of City districts to the sea. They responded to that [blocked] area which happens to be on the property of Savvy on the Bay, right next to Copacabana.

“It is clear from examination of the area with the drainage team that there is work which has to be carried out on the site in order for water to flow freely into the ocean. The team is going to do a further assessment to make a determination as to the best way to proceed and then we will meet again with the various parties and come up with a solution,” she said, adding she was grateful to Kinch and Taylor for agreeing to the terms.

Copacabana owner/ managing director Raj Chatrani said: “We understand that a public drain located in the property next to Copacabana has been blocked with concrete.

I can say that neither Copacabana nor myself, Raj Chatrani, have ever obstructed the public drain in question. We support any measures deemed necessary by the drainage unit to help resolve the problem that is causing flooding and overflow throughout the lower Bay Street area,” he said. (CA)

Source: Nation Newspaper


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 responses to “Savvy Copacabana dispute ignored by Mottley”


  1. Apologies it should have read Sandra Husbands.

  2. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ TLSN
    The problem is that we want to couch everything in some fascinating intellectual/ academic exercise. That is more suitable for nurturing those who are essentially uninformed or not aufait with “rigorous” debate. Anyone faintly familiar with Naom Chomsky for the past twenty five years , would know exactly what the globalists are saying today about neo-liberalism and so on.
    However, history is the greatest teacher, and when one has been exposed, to some of the most genuine progressive Caribbean minds, of the last six decades, their perspective tends to look inward because nothing that is happening now on the global scene would hold any deep fascination . Most of it was predicted by progressive thinkers at least one hundred or even more years ago.
    Many of the academics today are still grounded in irrelevant eurocentric thinking and we find ourselves promoting and reading so-called scholars , who are very cleverly regurgitating what was written long before they graduated from university.
    When stripped of all the fancy talk , the truth remains that those who condemn the emerging Caribbean civilzation are still, intellectually speaking, slaves. Unfortunately they have abandon Marley for eurocentricity.
    So, we will seriously continue to deal with the systematic socio economic destruction of the Caribbean, by a visionless group of leaders, who have abandoned their historical legacy, to enfranchise their people, and complete the Independence experiment.
    It may not sound as romantic and be inundated with cliches but we certainly will not contribute to the enslavement of our people twice because the new slavemaster looks a bit different or pretends that he is the enemy of our enemy. They are all friends and they will not abandon theirs to defend ours. Simple as that. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.


  3. You need to hold a mirror up to yourself. Who here has mentioned anything about you lot over the past few days? Here we were discussing an issue, not even studying you.

    It is YOU, YOU, YOU keeping the war going!


  4. William Skinner

    What a simpleminded rendering. The use of the same words of the academicians to make a man in the street point.

    Has China, Russia or Iran ever enslaved anybody in the Caribbean?

    When will you come to know that a master/slave dynamic is not the only one there is or has been?

    How come your imprecisions are never informed by a history beyond Whiteness?

    For you, are there to be any circumstances at all in this world or the ones to come which are possible without the centrality of this ill-defined Caribbean civilisational project, never well spelt out beyond the mouthings of the same academicians, public intellectuals, and so on?

    What is the history of a Caribbean civilization?

    And if it never happened before, given internalities, is it not plausible that the Caribbean has no potential to embarked on any any such thing?

    Should this Caribbean be a real project, could it pretend that 1492 must be the point of departure?

    Has anybody, even amongst the same academicians decried, measured in real terms what this means, after the tired sense of the feel good?

    Should the example in development be merely internally bound, all other lessons dismised because the developed ideas from elsewhere are immediately disqualified?

    What role would Afrika place in this adventure. And how come Afrika is never a point of reference for you?

    Are you unaware that the notions of a Caribbean have long been absent the cultures of Afrika by a collective mind?

    We can question you all day.

    BTW, Chomsky has been forced to retire. He’s nearly 100 and we know how that goes. Weeee know that this writer has been previously accused, by some, of having been too influenced by him.

    However, in the last decade this great linguist, public intellectual, has not been the person, on a number of positions, who this writer was once happy to influence thinking on a number of subjects.

    In short, the Caribbean civilizational project, as described, will never be more profound than what we’ve seen, we’re afraid!

  5. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    We will not be swayed by intellectual fantasy. If you don’t know what the emerging Caribbean civilization is and if you believe that the new global order would be kinder to our people , that is your position.
    You are a passionate globalist and we are unrepentant regionalists. A strong united Caribbean will have more global influence than a fragmented one. We will not abandon common sense and pretend that the Caribbean and its progressive thinkers are some inferior intellectual breed who don’t understand world affairs.
    The philosophical divide will have to stand.
    Long live the Caribbean !


  6. Hants, You beat me to it. I was looking for most recent Kinch’s post to comment on and I find you sitting here comfortably.
    Seems as if the hotel boom left a few players behind.
    Kinch still getting pinched.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading