โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The election of a President of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) will be held this weekend at the annual general conference to run from August 18th to 20th. On the ballot are David Estwick, Ryan Walters, Richard Sealy and incumbent, Ronnie Yearwood.

The election of a President of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) will be held this weekend at the annual general conference to run from August 18th to 20th. The interest of the country is piqued because with no other credible alternatives available the DLP represents the government in waiting.

What has spiced interest for many is the fact the DLP has had to accept two significant defeats in the last two general elections. So significant it was the party did not win a single seat. Although many prefer in the wake of the shellacking a credible third party movement would have emerged, it has not. Although disappointed, we have to console ourselves that the duopoly will be with us for the foreseeable future.

The blogmaster does not have a dog in the fight BUT being a keen observer of local politics, a few observations of a light nature on the current state of political affairs in the DLP camp are merited.

There are three challengers to the incumbent Dr. Ronnie Yearwood. First up, former minister of tourism Richard Sealy who also served as deputy prime minister under Freundel Stuart, he built his reputation on good tourism results straddling late David Thompson and Freundel Stuart administrations. The blogmaster will remember him as well for his effort to demonstrate the cleanliness of the South Coast waters at the height of the sewerage problem.

Second, Dr. David Estwick served in several ministries under Thompson and Stuart but in the opinion of the blogmaster his tenure was characterized by frequent conflict with Cabinet members, often times he breached the collective responsibility of Cabinet. He will also be remembered by some for allegedly brandishing a gun within the precincts of the hallowed halls of the Lower House and joining the Eager 11 faction. Always a fiery speaker on the political platform his antics are remembered more than his substantive arguments. If he were to become leader of the DLP lampooners will choke on the opportunities that abound.

Third, Ryan Walters is described as a businessman. His last assignment was that of General Manager with the local Burger King franchise. He is relatively young to the political scene and currently building his brand and network. Does the DLP need a relative unknown to lead at this time, does he have the political nous to jostle with hardliners in the DLP and at the same time execute a rebuild? Then there is the gargantuan task of preparing the party for 2027.

Last, the president in the chair Dr. Ronnie Yearwood, an academic and UWI lecturer who switched from the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) post 2013 after Sandra Husbands M.P. was given the nod in St. James South. The truth is, a year is a relatively short time for the newcomer to understand his new party – one with an entrenched culture – and then go about initiating the deep structural changes required to make the party relevant and competitive. Especially after 30-0 defeats in the last two general elections. DLP members will have to make the call.

The job of the winner to lead the DLP next week will not be easy. It is a political party still labouring under the weight of Errol Barrow’s legacy – made more difficult by the growing brand of Prime Minister Mia Mottley who is obviously positioning the BLP to make it three on the trot. The success of the DLP in future polls may not be on readiness post two significant defeats but whether Mottley retires from the job. There is also the fact growing dissatisfaction with a BLP controlling all the seats in the Lower House and possible compromise to our governance system.

May the best man win.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

97 responses to “DLP Rumble”


  1. @ Enuff

    I guess the below newspaper article’s headlines appropriately answers your question.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    “Dr Ronnie Yearwood reelected DLP President.”

    Article by Shamar Blunt
    Published on
    August 20, 2023

    “Dr Ronnie Yearwood has retained the presidency of the Democratic Labour Party.”


  2. @ David

    The ‘old guard’ has been REJECTED once again.

    Ironically, this is what Verla reportedly said after being reelected DLP president in 2020:

    “I know that we have had our tussles over the last few weeks and that makes you more quietly confident than anything else.”

    โ€œSo, the thanks goes out to the membership of the party for the confidence that has been reposed in me. Clearly the party has understood that we do need to make changes, they have embraced the changes that have been made and I hope that is a good sign that the other changes that have to come that they will also be onboard for them,โ€ she added….”

    “De Peiza described the party as โ€œone DLP pulling going forwardโ€, now that the internal elections are over.”

    Three (3) years later, Yearwood is, in Bajan parlance, ‘singing the same song’ as his predecessor.


  3. If a lowly blogmaster can give some advice to Dr. Yearwood. It is not enough to react to missteps of government, although there are enough of them to consume opposition commentary. He must assemble a group of sensible energetic representatives, to crawl the Barbados space in a sensible way. Many of the DLP deadbeats who call the talk shows and post bs on a daily basis he must find a way to combat. The do nothing g to assist the party although they believe they do. Last but not it is more than a year, the public needs to see the emergence of a credible dissenting voice and brand to fill the vacant political opposition voice which is there by default. Where is the plan?


  4. Congrats to Ronnie โ€œOโ€


  5. Ronnieโ€™s minimal tasks
    DR RONNIE YEARWOODโ€™S re-election as president of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has been met with the expected โ€œletโ€™s move forward togetherโ€ rallying cry from his supporters. Attentive listeners would, however, certainly have not missed the deep sigh of relief, barely muffled under the shouts of jubilation.
    For the DLP faithful, Yearwoodโ€™s re-election was celebrated more as an indicator of stability rather than a positive affirmation of the consolidation of the ideal leader who would achieve electoral victory. The re-election of Yearwood carries the same significance as that of Verla De Peiza over Guy Hewitt in 2021.
    Coming out of the 2018 General Election, a high priority was placed on โ€œsettling the leadershipโ€ and โ€œpresenting a united frontโ€ as key ingredients in the rebuilding process. Today, in 2023, following a second experience of a 30-0 defeat in the 2022 election, these concerns have been reinforced multi-fold.
    Given the objectively low point in which the DLP now finds itself, โ€œrebuildingโ€ is thought of strictly in electoral terms. It is for this reason that there is such hostility towards the โ€œold guardโ€, since their main โ€œweaknessโ€ is their past association with recent electoral defeats.
    Rebuilding
    The Yearwood camp sees restructuring as merely the inclusion of new faces that had little association with the DLPโ€™s recent past. Had there been a genuine commitment to rebuilding, perhaps a higher value would have been placed on โ€œexperienceโ€ in Government, and a proper mix of youth, technical competence, and popular appeal would have been pursued.
    There is a strong likelihood that Yearwoodโ€™s advisors will interpret his re-election as licence to decapitate the old guard. Many will see it as the last word on the leadership question. However, the vote count provides no such comfort. Yearwoodโ€™s 422 voters were fewer than the combined total of the three challengers. This suggests that more than half of the party membership remains unconvinced
    about Yearwood as the โ€œfinalโ€ pre-election answer. He remains a spot-holder until an unchallenged leader emerges or until the โ€œnever Ronnieโ€ group can coalesce around a single leader.
    The key message from the vote therefore is that the pre-convention situation remains largely unchanged. Yearwood has been given a mandate to pursue minimal tasks only. He cannot alienate any of the reluctant wings of the party. He should tread carefully.
    Perhaps, those who focus on โ€œelectoralโ€ readiness, might be reading the cards correctly. The next unchallenged leader of the DLP will be the one who can win a seat in the parliament, preferably his or her own. The minimal task for Yearwood will be to hold the party together into the next election. Any unnecessary internal shakeups prior to an election will be to his detriment. That is the first hurdle. Then, he must win at least one seat. Failure to do so will mark the end of his leadership.
    Tennyson Joseph is an associate professor of Political Science at North Carolina Central University. Email tjoe2008@live.com

    Source: Nation


  6. David, I agree with Tennyson Joseph. He provided a more detailed explanation to my August 20, 2023 6:03 AM contribution. Interestingly, Michael Lashley, who may be considered a member of the ‘old guard,’ received 75 more votes for 1st vice president (497), than Yearwood received for president (422). Since all the constituencies ‘are up for grabs’ for the DLP, perhaps Yearwood should be ‘eying’ a ‘safe seat.’ But, then again, he may be popular at the DLP level, where the DEMS come together…… irrespective of constituencies, but a ‘weak candidate’ at the national general elections level.

  7. Please stick to chocolate Avatar
    Please stick to chocolate

    Those who drink hot chocolate should stay away from reading tea leaves.

    With three hostile opponents gnashing at his heels, Ronnie O showed his speed and strength by almost lapping his nearest rival.

    To emerge with almost half of the cake in a hotly contested battle involving four parties should be seen as a sign of acceptance and strength.


  8. @Artax

    Agree, his job on the inside will be a difficult journey. All political parties have hardliners and various factions. The DLP because of its post 2013 collapse has created additional problems. A good showing at a by election called before the next general election may assist him. He needs a win. Ideally if he is able to win that by election before 2027.


  9. @Artax

    To add you your observation did you note the number of bites Blackett received? It reinforces Joseph and your point.

  10. William Skinner Avatar

    The very sad truth is that the DLP in all its misery, is still seen as the only viable alternative party. This is why all third parties from Dr. Bell’s to Alleyne and McClean’s along with Atherleys’s and Commissiong’s, along with the NDP, have not been able to seriously threaten the hold the BLP and DLP have on the country.
    The most pronounced statement in the above article implies that even if the DLP wins one seat at the next election, it will be back .
    Perhaps it’s time for some serious independent candidates to enter the ring.

  11. Don't believe that rumor - Blackett was not bitten Avatar
    Don’t believe that rumor – Blackett was not bitten

    I rush here to kill a rumor in its infancy.

    Though, the police was called at one stage, the DLP election was a peaceful affair. There was no biting or eye-gouging.

    Blackett was not bitten.


  12. @Artax

    Forgot to post this link, Blackett acquired the most votes.

    https://www.nationnews.com/2023/08/19/yearwood-back-helm-dlp/

  13. 36 ไทฃMing Yi (Brightness Hiding) Avatar
    36 ไทฃMing Yi (Brightness Hiding)

    “Those who drink hot chocolate should stay away from reading tea leaves.”

    Wise Sages like myself consult the I Ching Book of Change (for fun)

    What will happen to Ronnie Yearwood in next election?
    The coins have been tossed…
    Yin (New)
    Yin (New)
    Yin (New)
    Yang (New)
    Yin (New)
    Yang (New)

    I Ching Hexagram 36
    Ming Yi (Brightness Hiding)

    Action: Reignite

    Hu Gua (hidden influence) 40 Liberation: Untangle

    Zong Gua (underlying cause) 6 Conflict: Let Go

    When the light goes down, it may be wise to become invisible. Imagine fresh darkness, the period just after sunset or after a fire has gone out.
    Rouse new growth by hiding your talents and accepting the difficult journey. Though you feel held back, have no fear.

    The present is embodied in Hexagram 36 – Ming I (Darkening of the Light): It will be advantageous to realize the difficulty of the position, and maintain firm correctness.
    There are no changing lines, and hence the situation is expected to remain the same in the immediate future.
    The things most apparent, those above and in front, are embodied by the upper trigram K’un (Earth), which represents docility and receptivity.
    The things least apparent, those below and behind, are embodied by the lower trigram Li (Fire), which represents brightness and warmth.

  14. Call yourself ELP, CL, FLP or anything except DLP Avatar
    Call yourself ELP, CL, FLP or anything except DLP

    I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations …”

    It appears as if some of the erroneous Bible teaching have strayed into our political thoughts. Some believe that if the DLP came with 30 new and fresh candidates they should be/would be rejected because of the DLP label. If these same candidates called themselves the ELP, the should be given a chance. Perhaps, the should use NLP – new labor party.

    This kind of logic has thrown my head in a spin. I will be back later

  15. Fighting spin with spin Avatar
    Fighting spin with spin

    With 510 votes to 290, Mr Blackett, just like our hero Ronnie O, almost lapped his opponents. We must commend both these two gentlemen for the commanding victory that they both won.

    I will not resort to the low level of political discussion and claim that ‘Blackett rode in Ronnie’s coattail’.


  16. Please excuse typos and bad grammar.
    Proof reading before posting appears to be not working


  17. If it is all about numbers perhaps Wickham and Joseph should do a deep dive on the BCA elections since Conde won by a landslide (3 votes) and more votes were cast against him than for him, also many of the candidates for other positions received more votes than he did but I am not a numbers man so what do I know.

    Anyway, cricket seems to be on the downslide in Bim so any number can win.


  18. @Sargeant

    The results are related, we see the trend in trade union, credit union and other elections – a small band of people are able to influence the national trajectory on important matters. We shouldnโ€™t be surprise to see the trend in national elections. There is a level of cynicism and apathy being demonstrated by residents in the island that has started to compromise our ability as a nation to soar.


  19. David, credit must be given to Blackett for not abandoning the DLP, after the 2018 general elections, as many of their candidates seemingly ‘went into hiding’ thereafter. As interim president, he tried to revitalise the party. Blackett’s tenure as general secretary has, so far, been exceptional, demonstrated by his ability to perhaps put personal differences or biases aside, to exhibit his support for former president DePeiza, current president, Yearwood, as well as being a ‘loyal, committed’ member of the Democratic Labour Party. Hence, his overwhelming victory. He reminds me of the late DLP stalwart, Astor B. Watts.


  20. @Artax

    Agree with you to a point. He seems to be the glue holding the factions together but at what price?


  21. Similar could be said about Verla defeating Guy Hewitt. After that election, she ‘insisted the DLP was now stronger than it ever was,’ and, “the 22nd August, 2021, signals the return of the Democratic Labour Party, energised.” According to the old saying, ‘rest is history.’ The mere fact THREE members challenged Yearwood for presidency, clearly indicates some people are not satisfied with his leadership, which, if we make an honest assessment, has so far not been impressive. He was unable to ‘energise’ the DEMS during his first presidential tunure. I wish him all the best ‘this time around.’


  22. David, Joseph suggested that failure to win at least one seat in the upcoming general elections, would essentially ‘mark the end of Yearwood’s leadership.’ Perhaps this maybe a reference to Verla’s tenure. Recall her leadership came under more scrutiny, when the DLP did not win the St. George North by-election, with ‘home town boy,’ Floyd Reifer, as their candidate. And, abruptly ended when the DEMS suffered their second 30 – 0 defeat at the polls.


  23. @Artax

    It would be interesting to observe which constituency Yearwood has his eye on or will he return to SJS.


  24. St. James South may be the ideal constituency for Yearwood, David. He has a ‘political familiarity’ with the area, from both BLP and DLP perspectives. And, Donville’s assistance is another fact to consider, as well as the BLP’s poularity, which has already peaked, and is steadily on the decline.


  25. @Artax

    It might turn out that way, there is also a possible 3rd term factor which may see Mottleyโ€™s coat tails appreciably shortened combined with % national swing against incumbent resulting in some candidates washed away.


  26. Politically Lashey is the victor keep eyes on him he is playing a smart positional game

    Bulldog got a very small increase in votes his votes can be considered hardline against Ronnie O. If the old blood had had dropped out then we would have a good fight between the young blood

    @david
    After over a year my man is the only one that presented a plan. Any plan Ronnie come with now better be totally original or he will be seen as a copier


  27. โ€œPutting the $1.3 billion debt the Government owes to the NIS back onto the books of government will not take the debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio to over 170 per cent as suggested by Mr Persaud. The addition of $1.3 billion will take the national debt to just over $16 billion from currently almost $15 billion. Given the Barbados economy is over $12 billion in size, including the NIS debt would put the debt-to-GDP ratio at just over 130 per cent,โ€ he said.โ€

    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Ronnie O

    These kind of mistakes is what going to kill u when u come up head to head against Mia.

    It is not the 1.3B that will return te debt ratio to 170%
    It is the reversing of the debt restructuring that will

    The 1.3B can be paid back but we have to come out of the debt restructuring agreement first before that can go on the book.

    U are starting off u second term live u finished the first

    Think before u speak !


  28. David Bu i believe Dr Yearwood being return as president of the dems will lead to certaim defeat for the dems whenever Ms Mottley calls the next election.As i have stated he is a political lightweight who like Ms Depeiza will struggle to win a seat.How can he as leader inspire anyone else?If he could not beat Ms Husbands how will he fare head to head with a political heavyweight like Ms Mottley?.I gone.


  29. @Lorenzo

    The talking heads are out!

    The DLP conundrum

    This article was written and submitted by Peter Wickham, who is a political consultant and a director of Caribbean Development Research Services (CADRES).
    Although the outcome of the Democratic Labour Partyโ€™s (DLP) election last Saturday was hailed as a resounding victory by the re-elected president and his supporting cast, a sober reflection on the facts suggests a very different reality.
    President Dr Ronnie Yearwood should be congratulated on having scored more votes than any of his adversaries, however, to suggest that this is all that matters reflects a shallow analysis.
    In reality, more people voted against Yearwood and this is indisputable evidence of a divide within the DLP, which cannot be โ€œwished awayโ€.
    The DLP, therefore, continues to navigate the most tempestuous political waters imaginable with a crew that is not settled on this captain.
    The complex situation is illuminated by the appended chart which presents data from 2022 and 2023 and superimposes the key characteristic of candidates based on their vintage. In the wake of the 2018 defeat, I contended that the DLP was best advised to move away from the old guard and these data demonstrate that this has generally been its inclination.
    If the leaders were to be classified based on vintage in both 2022 and 2023, the majority of party supporters were inclined towards a โ€œYoung Turkโ€ and the 2023 outcome consolidates that sentiment in excess of two-thirds of votes cast. In this regard, there were two โ€œYoung Turkโ€ options in 2023, which clearly generated more interest among DLP members and this helps to affirm the contention that the DLP had all but settled on the idea of a leader who is not from the old guard.

    https://barbadosunderground.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Wickham_DLP_graph.png
    Far less clear
    The issue, therefore, is which โ€œYoung Turkโ€ should take the party forward and here the outcome is far less clear. The 2022 result suggested that Yearwood might have been the person as he scored 57 per cent support against a single opponent (David Estwick). In 2023, however, Yearwood slipped into unpopular territory (49 per cent) demonstrating a significant loss of support among the DLP faithful.
    Yearwoodโ€™s supporters have argued that his showing this year is nonetheless impressive; however, there are a few critical factors that should be contemplated, starting with the fact that in 2022 Yearwood was selected based on appearance, while the 2023 selection was based on performance.
    Another critical factor is located in one of Yearwoodโ€™s โ€œachievementsโ€ which is the registration of 600 new members to the DLP. This is a good thing, however, this expansion in membership appears not to have been to his benefit since he only increased his number by 149. Moreover, close to half of these people appear not to have participated in the election since the total number of electors only increased by 388. Increases aside, these levels of participation raise questions regarding a party which secured 30 000 votes nationally, but is yet to attract 1 000 members to participate in an internal election.
    As a sidenote, the comparative performance of Estwick (227 versus 205) puts paid to rumours that he registered large numbers of new Dems who one adversary argued โ€œcould not find George Street on a mapโ€. Nonetheless, we hope that
    after this second attempt, Estwick will be convinced that the DLP is not interested in his leadership.
    The main question facing Yearwood as he goes forward, therefore, is whether he can consolidate the old and new segments of the DLP under his leadership and it should be clear by now that I am of the opinion that he cannot. Certainly, support for an old guard leader has fallen to less than a third in 2023. However, Yearwood has simultaneously become unpopular.
    This scenario is perhaps explained by a somewhat misguided approach to unity by Yearwood. In his re-election campaign, Yearwood noted that โ€œheโ€ was the candidate who could prevent the DLP from another 30-Love which is a serious indictment of his opponents who can now lay claim to more support than him.
    Certainly, leaders are entitled to believe in themselves, however, this level of arrogance in projecting himself as the DLPโ€™s messiah seems odd when one considers that Yearwood has not recorded a single national victory during his short sojourn in DLP politics.
    Unsurprisingly, Yearwood has further exacerbated the situation by using muscular language in respect of detractors who apparently โ€œleakedโ€ the list of members. The central issue is at any rate absurd since a membership list should never be a secret to members and far less candidates who seek to lead that organisation.
    The suggestion that they โ€œwill payโ€ was attributed to Yearwood in one section of the press and in the absence of a denial one assumes that this is how he proposes to deal with persons whom he needs to embrace going forward.
    Similarly, another analyst who is partial to Yearwood, suggested that the party will โ€œhaveโ€ to unite behind Yearwood in light of this result, which reflects either astounding naivety or a shocking ignorance of the traditions within the DLP.
    As time passes, the reality that history repeats itself will guide us towards a recollection of the experience of Dr Mascoll who shares much in common with Dr Yearwood. They are both intelligent and committed politicians and should have (had) bright futures. Mascoll ascended the DLPโ€™s leadership podium in the worst of times and, like Yearwood, led the DLP without a seat.
    Like Yearwood, Mascoll worked hard in support of the DLP, but like Yearwood, his efforts impacted little and his Achilles heel was that he was never able to unite the DLP behind him.
    Unsurprisingly, the DLP quickly jettisoned Mascoll when the true Messiah presented himself and Mascoll threw a tantrum and crossed the floor. Needless to say, Yearwood does not have the option of returning to the BLP, so it will be interesting to see what becomes of him if he is unable to reverse his fortunes during the next two years of his presidency.

    Source: Nation


  30. Ok! Bushie is flawed…

    But it is VERY difficult to read Petra Wickie without the constant reminder that he submits himself to his white Frenchman husband at nights.
    This is especially so, knowing how those white Frenchmen have ALWAYS (even now in Niger) treated Black people who look like Petra…

    Bushie congratulates Dr Yearwood on a resounding victory.
    The bushman FULLY expects that he will go on to piss Petra off – with his lack of interest in โ€˜uniting anyone BEHIND himโ€™, but rather, by building up the damn party (and indeed country) to the best of his ability – as Mascoll did himself – via which ever shiite Party they happened to use.

    What has Petra done for Barbados apart from being a poster boy for the bulling agenda…?


  31. “Walters received 188 votes, compared to Dr Ronnie Yearwoodโ€™s 422. Also contesting the presidency were Dr David Estwick, who received 227 votes, and Richard Sealy (29 votes).’

    Wickham’s treatise if not wrong is a little dishonest.
    1. To compare a head to head result directly with one that has four candidates is misleading. We do not know who the voters would have selected if it was the great ‘Ronnie O versus one other candidate. It is ridiculous to believe that in a 1-2 match some voters would not have voted for the ‘great Ronnie O’.

    2. I am somewhat surprised that PW acts like a statistician but depends only on basic arithmetic. It should be clear that a statistical hypothesis that half of the voters supported the great Ronnie O would not be rejected.

    3. This reinforces point 2 above.
    Half of 866 is 433. Ronnie O received 422 votes.

    Mr Wickham has a penchant for making mountains out of molehills.


  32. It is obvious Yearwood was unable to get votes from DLP members who voted for Lashley et al. It is a non point to debate otherwise. Why would that same DLP abstain from voting for Yearwood? The answer is obvious, Yearwood has a lot of work to do.


  33. I suspect that if there was a run-off off between he two leading candidates the ‘great Ronnie O would have collected more than 57%.

    Wickham appears to be a ‘Lorenzo’ type who has grown familiar with a pocket calculator. His reasoning is still at Lorenzo level


  34. The bigger issue is that a small Yearwood after a year at the helm has been unable to energize the base to come out to vote. Also a corollary is that the majority of new young members didnโ€™t come out. Why get caught up in discussing numbers that in the scheme of things is statistical insignificant.


  35. Calling a braniac.
    I cannot understand Wickham’s graphs. Can you explain them to me or I will force to believe that Wickham believes Adding (any) graph makes my shit looks credible.

    Rabbit, are you there.


  36. “It is obvious Yearwood was unable to get votes from DLP members who voted for Lashley et al. It is a non point to debate otherwise. Why would that same DLP abstain from voting for Yearwood?”

    Sounds good, but absolute rubbish.

    1. The ‘great Ronnie O’ would be an idiot if he expected every one who voted for Lasley previously to vote for him now. To expect a 100% conversion rate is folly.

    2. The above analysis is incredibly simplistic
    a. It suggest that everyone who voted in 2022 is voting again
    b. It also suggests that Ronnie O has the same supporters now, the raw numbers contradict this


  37. Why get caught up in discussing numbers that in the scheme of things is statistical insignificant.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    To be frank Boss… because YOU did us the disservice of posting Petraโ€™s drivel bright and early this morning.

    In any case,
    Bushie recalls that the now mighty Mia lost a party leadership vote, ..and even now, has to make every damn MP a Minister, LEAST her donkey be slain at the political alter.

    Petra is NOT particularly bright, (unlike both Drs. Mascoll and Yearwood) and seems to be constantly seeking to compensate for this reality.


  38. You may have the last word.


  39. @Bush Tea

    Unfortunately being bright on its own will not cut it when it comes to breathing live into the DLP. Yearwood will not benefit from what Mottley had.


  40. TheO

    600+ joined under Ronnie O
    List three things Ronnie done to advance the party in the last 1.25yrs

    Let me give u one. He name 3 spokespersons.
    Name the three and when last anyone of the spoke

  41. Leave the spin for cricket Avatar
    Leave the spin for cricket

    Numbers may be ok. Leave the spin for cricket


  42. @J2
    Please direct your questions to the ‘great Ronnie O’.

    I consider myself a neutral but I like to bat against bad spin.


  43. I consider myself a neutral. hahahahaha
    a newtroll?
    an old D wrapped in the stars and stripes.


  44. Gazzerts i know you like to defend the dems and Dr Yearwood but i will tell you this.Dr Yearwood will suffer the same fate as the previous nightwatchman Ms Depeiza.He will not win his seat unless he stps up his game and the dems will be lucky to win 5 seats.Dr Yearwood would do well to heed Mr Wickham, s advice and start doing some serious work.Attacking Ms Mottley without alternative solutions ain, t cutting it.The dems cussed Ms Mottley back in 2018 and lost badly.I gone.


  45. Not understanding this analysis by another talking head.

    Assessing the DLP election

    by DEVARON BRUCE

    AFTER SEVERAL WEEKS in the publicโ€™s eye, the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has concluded its annual conference and has re-elected Dr Ronnie Yearwood as president.
    Contrary to some early pronouncements in some quarters, Yearwoodโ€™s re-election should come as no surprise if one were properly analysing the DLP race. This was the case as those who challenged Yearwood did not have sufficient political openings to meaningfully contrast themselves to his presidency.
    However, with the election over, the results allow for a better assessment of what occurred and the implications for the future. In a recent article, one political analyst deemed Yearwoodโ€™s re-election as a โ€œconundrumโ€ for the DLP.
    This was largely premised on the fact that Yearwood received 49 per cent of the vote which meant a majority of the party voted against him. However, a closer look at the candidatesโ€™ performances and the unique situation of the race paints a different picture.
    Special conference
    At the special conference election in 2022, there was a straight matchup between Yearwood and Dr David Estwick. In this instance, Yearwood garnered 57 per cent of the vote, whereas Estwick received 43 per cent. Fast forward to 2023, Yearwood received 49 per cent of the vote while Estwick received 26 per cent. Therefore, Yearwoodโ€™s average performance as a candidate is 53 per cent which is a clear majority.
    Nevertheless, itโ€™s the inability of Yearwood to capture more than 50 per cent of the vote that remains a sticking point for another political analyst which I will explore. In 2023, although Yearwood saw an eight per cent decline in party support, it must be noted that in contrast, Estwick oversaw a 17 per cent decline. Therefore, Estwick lost party support at twice the rate of Yearwood and these declines are certainly worthy of investigation.
    Ultimately, it was the candidacy of Ryan Walters who received 21 per cent of the vote that was responsible for these declines. It is well understood that Estwick and Walters actively and forcefully campaigned for the presidency and were therefore rewarded with a sizeable share of the vote. This contrasts with Richard Sealy, who was far more indolent in his campaign, hence receiving only three per cent.
    Nevertheless, despite Estwickโ€™s and Waltersโ€™ vigorous pursuit for presidency, Yearwood amassed an impressive 49 per cent of the vote. Therefore, in the absence of Walters being a โ€œspoilerโ€, Yearwood would have produced an even more convincing performance. This assumption is premised on the fact that Estwick oversaw a decline in support at twice the rate of Yearwood
    which give a clear indication who the party preferred between the two.
    Therefore, in a head-to-head matchup between Yearwood and Estwick, Estwickโ€™s rate of decline in support would have been positively reflected in Yearwoodโ€™s performance. As such, the notion that Yearwood is unpopular since he received 49 per cent of the vote is overly simplistic as it ignores the โ€œspoilerโ€ effect of Walters, and Yearwoodโ€™s ability to better maintain support unlike Estwick.
    Beyond the numbers, references were made between the David Thompson and Dr Clyde Mascoll era, where Yearwood, like Mascoll, is presumably seen as a seat warmer until the emergence of the DLP โ€œmessiahโ€. However, the Thompson and Mascoll era is in stark contrast to what currently exists, as Thompson and Mascoll co-existed where there could only be one true political leader. Therefore, Mascoll governed the DLP at a time where a clear, natural, and capable alternative for leadership existed.
    However, this situation no longer obtains as there is no clear alternate to Yearwood. This is evidenced by the fact that 74 per cent of the party voted against Estwick and 79 per cent against Walters.
    Ultimately, a careful, fair, and balanced assessment of the DLP election would show that concerns regarding the unpopularity of Yearwood are exaggerated, given the unique situation of a vigorous three-person race for the presidency.

    Devaron Bruce is a political scientist.


  46. Why fear internal democracy?

    IN RECENT NATION articles I have felt compelled to offer suggestions for the deepening of internal democratisation within the main opposition Democratic Labour Party (DLP) of Barbados as a key ingredient in its renewal, especially in the context of the two consecutive 30-0 electoral defeats.
    I have argued persistently that the DLP must be open to the greatest levels of internal democratisation and public engagement as key to its electoral recovery.
    In an April 20, 2023 article entitled Yearwoodโ€™s DLP: Trials And Errors, I argued against the tendency of a small ruling clique being pre-occupied strictly with branding since this would result in โ€œstifling democracy among the wider membershipโ€.
    I argued instead that a โ€œpolitical party is a broad churchโ€ and โ€œan organic being that captures within itself all shades of the countryโ€. Thus, a struggling institution like the DLP should let โ€œ1 000 flowers bloomโ€.
    Unfortunately, the recent DLP executive disinvitation of the grassroots invitation to prominent trade unionist Caswell Franklyn to address the St Peter branch on the raging hot National Insurance Scheme pension issue shows clearly that tensions exist between expectations of autonomy by constituency branches on one hand, and tendencies for centralism by the party centre on the other.
    This can only lead to withdrawal, apathy and demotivation on the part of the party base who might feel themselves dis-appreciated and alienated by the overly bureaucratic leadership.
    The questions then arise: Why would a struggling opposition party be reluctant to embrace the participation of a prominent unionist who is leading a struggle against a controversial government policy which has galvanised public attention?
    Wouldnโ€™t a party with no seats in the House welcome the activity of its branch by tapping into the most significant anti-government moment since 2018?
    Moreover, didnโ€™t the tension between the branch and the executive over the invitation to Franklyn spill into the public domain, contributing to public perceptions of โ€œinfightingโ€, issues which, no doubt, would cause concern for the partyโ€™s upper leadership, eager to demonstrate stability?
    None of this, in the final analysis, is surprising.
    Decades ago, CLR James in Party Politics in the West Indies had insisted that given the history of plantation slavery, there was no deep instinctive culture of democracy at any level of society, far less in the political parties. James felt that despite all the palaver about Caribbean democracy, the instinct was towards authoritarianism and the control by central elites of those at the bottom.
    Readers may determine for themselves the accuracy of CLR Jamesโ€™s observations. However, the DLP, given its weakened state, is now in a prime position to embrace internal democracy as a necessary act of political resurrection. History, and recent events, however, do not leave room for optimism. It may take future electoral defeats and more sustained internal disputes to create the conditions for internal democracy to flourish.
    Tennyson Joseph is Associate Professor of Political Science at North Carolina Central University. Email tjoe2008@live.com

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading