Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama

As the coalition of forces gather with their vested interests of displace the American fascist dictator, Donald Trump, on a civil warlike political battlefield, it is becoming quite clear that people who call themselves ‘progressives’ will only awake to the machinations, political tricks, being conjured and to the tectonic shifts under the battlefield when it is far too late. Such a re-imagining of American politics, as neoliberalism was the remixing of economic policies, must of necessity, leave ‘progressives’ out in the cold.

We are estimating that this Democratic-led coalition which is likely to emerge from a possible victory will lurch much further rightward than progressives are generally imagining. For Joe Biden is merely running as a Democrat but intends to rule as a Republican. This is all he has known all his life. Being a conservative Democrat means being a Republican. Same as Obama, there are few differences between factions within the duopoly. Biden has never been known to instinctively done anything progressive in his whole life. Above all, politics is about slicing and dicing as an acceptable method of gaining power, not being a fountain of virtue. Not interfering with the hideous structural infirmities on which the country has been built. This is representative of Joe Biden to the bone!

Therefore, it would be irrational to expect a man like Biden to approach, for example, the misanthropically inspired symbology represented by the ‘Star Spangle Banner’, the national anthem, which glorifies slavery in one of its verses. Or revisit the 13th Amendment of the constitution which still legalizes slavery for people in America’s dungeons, 80% of whom are of colour. Need we go on?

Then, the question which progressives will never get answered is – how could he ‘Build Back Better’ on such a flawed foundation? All Biden really wants to do is to get back to how things were before Donald J. Trump was thrown up by the political culture as if those represented halcyon days for Afrikan-Americans, supposedly his most dependable bloc. That’s all!

But, who are these people generally referred to as ‘progressives’? Well, they could be any motley bunch of political gradations from the far-right to the far-left and in-between. To the far-right they may include Republicans who support the logic of climate change and even never-Trumpers. To the far-left they may be communists, antifascists, socialists or even Trotskyists influenced by the lesser of two evils logic.

In this scenario, Joe Biden would, in effect, be the ‘unwitting’ savior of the Republican Party which is likely to be devastated by a massive defeat, if current polling holds true and in the event Trump is unable to complete that well-planned dastardly act currently underway. Should Biden be buoyed by the winds of a fierce national and overwhelming determination which forces Trump into having no other choice but to leave the White House, even to the point of duress if deemed necessary he saves the Republican Party. In so doing, he would be serving the hordes of Republicans seeking asylum within the Democratic Party as a way of making sure the indispensable other half of the American political duopoly survives Trumpism – the Republican Party.

When we look back at the presidency of Trump, in this scenario, it might appear as though a level of master planning, by hidden hands, paved the way for Biden. He could have the prefect landing to enable him to jettison feckless progressive operating under the assumption that this Democratic Party’s ‘donkey’ will take them somewhere. In addition, Biden could have a highly conservative Supreme Court; a Senate which could be Democratic led but more than willing to serve his less than obvious conservative agenda and a House of Representatives acting likewise with muted or sporadic objections from its progressive caucus.

In these circumstances, the LGBTQ identity politicos, who played such an enormous role during the Obama administration, would not be able to co-exist with the Republican elements within the Biden Coalition, absent the few Log Cabin Republicans. If Biden is faced with a choice between these political forces, there is little doubt that he will go with his new-found friends for the fear about defections of the Republicans may cause too much imbalance within his coalition. He will seek to equalize that action by resting on the logic that the LGBTQ forces generally have nowhere else to go.

The same thinking holds true for Afrikan-Americans, Hispanics, and other progressives who will have nowhere to go notwithstanding the presence of a fledgling Green Party with a presidential candidate, Howie Hawkins, and up to maybe a 100 other people seeking the presidency. Defections of progressives are likely to be deemed as merely a temporary setback. Afrikan-Americans should not expect this reformulation of political forces within neoliberal capitalism will deliver any of Biden’s promises about ‘Building Back Better’ and so on. Nothing will happen but talk, until after the election when the drift to the right becomes public. Observers however, can see what a Biden administration will look like right now by the examination of his teams of advisers. To us such expectations are the equivalent of asking a dead man to change his will and expecting it to happen.

One good thing about Biden is that he has dared to locate himself as it to remove the scab from the old festering wounds making America the fascist state it might have always been and/or to which it has now degenerated for all to see. Of course, he was well assisted by the ongoing demonstrations throughout the country and being a politician there was a need for a response that made sense in order to garner the votes of Afrikan-Americans, women, progressives, young people etc.

In some ways Biden has been sheltered by Whiteness and a hyper focus in the country on what is wrongly seen as a cultural anomaly, the Trump presidency. However, the deeper truth is that Biden will never fix, or even start to fix, in eight (8) years, what was consolidated over four centuries.

Guided by history, only the total and complete destruction of American empire can satisfactorily settle these deeply divisive issues, correct all the fundamental social problems that have been termed ‘original sins’. Some contend that this fatal option maybe better that Biden’s return to an abnormal normalcy. Progressives should have long recognized the existential forces at work and found ways to insert someone more able to deal the rebuilding that has to happen and therefore avoid this Biden misdirection.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

940 responses to “JOE BIDEN, SO-CALLED ‘PROGRESSIVES’ AND THE REARRANGEMENT OF THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE”


  1. … and that’s what Trump is all about.


  2. “Do you see why the electoral college does the business of electing a president?”
    not sure if you are ignorant and stupid or deliberately deceitful and duplicitous, the jury is still out, it’s in the balance
    FYI electoral college was to maintain slavery while denying slaves and descendants rights to vote


  3. What were Thomas Paine’s beliefs?
    Paine became notorious because of his pamphlets. In The Age of Reason he advocated deism, promoted reason and free thought and argued against institutionalized religion in general and Christian doctrine in particular.

    Does Thomas Paine believe in God?
    At the beginning of Part I of the Age of Reason, Paine lays out his personal belief: I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

    What were Thomas Paine’s last words?
    The last words of Thomas Paine were not: “I would give worlds if I had them, that the Age of Reason had never been published. O, Lord, help me!

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    That’s google.

    He sounds like he was a Quaker!!


  4. We had earlier proffered that the Democrats always conspire with the Republicans to maintain the duopolistic political structure.

    And here we have additional evidence.

    Chuck Schumer went on TV this morning to opine how the belligerant nomination of Barrett could not be effective opposed, subjected to beauracratic hurdles, for three weeks, until after the election

    That stinking fecker!

    While Rodgers Rules of Order provide all kinds of mechanisms by which hurdles could be erected by a minority having more than a third.

    Even when these Democrats were in the majority in the Senate, under Obama, they were still ineffective and were either bullied or bulled by a Republican minority. These rh Democrats are spineless.

    Schmer however then proceeded to assert that should there be a failure of the Republicans to submit to a Covid testing regime before the full Senate has to vote on Barrett he would make sure that there is not a quorum present. Senators could only vote in person it seems.

    Why the rh could this fecker not use his numbers in this way earlier to tie up Trump?

    This is another example of the insiduous games played by Democrats all the time.

    Democrats have long known that Republicans commit all kind of election fraud yet it has never been raised as the national security issue that it is. Why? Because these feckers will do anything to keep the status quo in place.

    We would be unsurprised if the Drmocrats won the election but under the rubric of country first allowed Trump to rule for four more years, at least.


  5. Ma

    They are finally figuring out what the half wit supporters of Trump knew all along!!

    The Democrats are terrified.

    They need to find God.


  6. @ Quaker John

    Thomas Paine flirted with Quakerism, so did Jefferson. In fact, it can be claimed that Quakerism founded the US, something I thought you would know. Paine left France and went to the US, after he was wanted in what was then England.
    Paine also flirted with Deism, along with Thomas Morgan, thus my question. Those were days when Deism and Quakerism ebbed and flowed in to each other.
    In short, at the root of the philosophy behind American Independence was a mixture of Quakerism and Deism. So, to talk of founding fathers, the writing of the constitution was a final act of a long rebellious process.
    By the way, I will add to the myth of Barrow as father of independence, the real source, the foundation of the break up of the British Empire was a little known American Jewish man, Harry Dexter White.
    It was his tough negotiations with John Maynard Keynes, after the end of the Second World War, that led to Britain liberating the colonies. Read the Battle of Bretton Woods, by Benn Steil.


  7. @555dubstreet/John

    You’re. being derailed by a famous BU tag team. They are perfecters at deviations.


  8. @ Tony
    not sure if you are implying I am being derailed or the derailer, but I am nothing to do with John Knox.. fuck that!

    Anyhow, here’s the KKK Black wall Street Tulsa race riots of 1921 from the watchmen series for your viewing pleasure

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF2XgS5GPAk


  9. Hal

    I’ll even give you some of the Barbadian Quaker families from which came the United States of America.

    So if you can accept the United States of America is the result of Quakerism, it should be easy to accept that Quakers also ended slavery.

    That’s why I keep saying that every square inch of Barbados is a World Heritage Site and can be used to make Barbados into a unique tourist attraction..


  10. God used the early Quakers to spread His Word.


  11. Pacha,

    Rome was not built in a day. Neither will its destruction be accomplished in a day.

    You want cataclysmic change such as that which wiped out the dinosaurs. I prefer a gradual evolution.

    And I do believe that mankind is evolving, albeit slowly, for the better. Each generation is becoming more enlightened to our common humanity and pretty soon there will be enough of the enlightened ones to keep the human dinosaurs in check.

    I don’t see that the destruction of America is necessary. They will have a reckoning and they will evolve.

    SLOWLY.

    P.S. Forgive my mixed metaphors.


  12. Quaker John

    For a mathematician I like how you jump logical steps. Quakers were a dominant force in the US; Quakers in Barbados interchanged with Quakers in the US; hey presto, Quakers abolished slavery.
    The answer again is that that flies in the face of historical evidence. It was the resistance from the slaves, from 1638-1837, that played a big part in making slavery economically untenable, and the Clapham Sect piled on the moral pressure on parliament and the plantation owners. Many Quakers (ie Penn) still owned slaves.
    There were slave revolts in the Caribbean, from the Bahamas and Bermuda (are they in the Caribbean?), to Jamaica, Barbados, Demerara, Trinidad and Tobago.


  13. If you want to understand what a proper slave revolt was like looked at the Zanj rebellion.

    It is the only one I have found of any significance.

    Yet, that did not stop slavery, it still lasted a millennia or more after.

    What minor uprisings happened in the West Indies were nothing.

    How long did the 1816 slave uprising last in Barbados?

    How many similar uprisings occurred in the 1700’s?

    Sugar was never profitable except in times of war.

    Trade is what built the economy of the English speaking New World.

    Trade is what precipitated war.


  14. Watching this crowd at a Trump rally in Florida. What a putz.


  15. John

    Harriet Tubman freed 70+ slaves
    Slaves were valuable property worth $500-$1000
    Runaway slaves forced owners into bankruptcy
    She also helped free 100’s during Civil war working for the Union Army

    Nat Turner’s rebellion 1831 killed 50+ whites

    Slavery was abolished in 1833 GB 1865 USA

    Jamaicans Maroon rebellion lasted 1728-1740 until peace treaty with colonial British


  16. David,

    These people are more stupid than a twelve year old Ellerslie boy who seems not to have spread his COVID infection outside of his household.

    Barbados has managed, it seems, to have contained the outbreak and killed that infectious thread yet again with masks, social distancing and good hand hygiene.

    What is so hard to understand about that?

    The whole world could have contained the pandemic and been reopened if these fools had done three simple things along with contact tracing and testing from the beginning with a lockdown for about two months.

    Politicising an apolitical virus!

    “Oh, what fools these mortals be!”

    Mostly white people and a few wannabe white Uncle Toms fighting for the right to get sick and possibly die, infect others and possibly kill them.

    This thing is not going anywhere in any hurry.


  17. Donna

    You are in danger of recieving a “like” from the Like Monster here. LOL

    Seriously though, we accept your gradualistic approach. However, things don’t necessarily happen in predictables ways all the time.

    In your own lifetime there was an empire called the Soviet Union and almost overnight it was no more. Not even the Western intelligence agencies didn’t see this coming, they say.

    Yes, it takes a constellation of forces to bring an empire down, historically established logic. However, in the case of the American hyperpower a single event could bring down the house of cards in a short time – an exodus from the US dollar.

    But beyond that, America is submitting to what is generally called “exhaustion”. And it is at an advanced stage as well. You should examine the state of public infrastructures from coast to coast.

    Whether it is the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal spheres we see clear signs of empire’s exhaustion.

    And when that point is reached any social scientist interested in these things will conclude that there is no turning back.


  18. @Donna

    Observing the stupidity being exhibited by the president of the USA and his staff, it beggars belief.


  19. David

    Donald Trump is a clear indication that empire is dying.

    You can’t be “the exceptional nation” and produce a Donal Trump.

    Donna, Rome had a series of madmen like Trump at its nadir.

    America is a carbon copy of Rome in its construction.


  20. Everybody knows everything there is to know about slavery except the very simplest facts.

    The underground railroad in the USA was run by Quakers!!


  21. Pacha,

    Maybe you are right. Mine is just an opinion. Could be the rot has set in.


  22. … and Hal, if slavery was so economically untenable why did it continue in several countries well after its aboiition in the British Empire?

    The answer is simple.

    It wasn’t economically untenable in in those countries where it continued.

    What were those countries?

    When you answer this and other simple questions you will appreciate what Quakers did!!


  23. David,

    Astounding, really. I never knew there were so many humans with intelligence levels as low as these people. I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Totally disoriented.


  24. Donna

    Maybe. But the evidence is pointing in that direction.


  25. “The underground railroad in the USA was run by Quakers!!”

    There were free blacks who also ran the underground


  26. The revolution that produced Haiti in 1804 took place in the absence of slaves.

    France had freed its slaves in 1794!!

    In 1801/2 Napoleon decided to reintroduce slavery.

    The ensuing revolutions in Haiti and Guadeloupe were undertaken by free men and women against armies under LeClerc (Haiti) and Richepanse (Guadeloupe) that were sent to enslave them.

    Why did Napoleon reintroduce slavery?

    Because in French possessions not only was it economically very tenable but sugar was also immensely profitable.

    Napoleon needed the profits to finance his upcoming war.

    Why was sugar immensely profitable in in French Possessions and not English possessions?

    Let’s see how sharp the tacks on BU are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  27. Hal AustinOctober 12, 2020 2:54 PM

    @ Quaker John

    Thomas Paine flirted with Quakerism

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    Thomas Paine was brought up in a household whose head was a Quaker.

    Thomas Paine was undoubtedly raised as a Quaker!!


  28. “Let’s see how sharp the tacks on BU are”

    Showing off and mental masturbation seems to be a Bajan trait

    Barbados was primarily a slave port to America, when USA got Independence after War 1765–1783, they wanted to get their own slaves instead of British Monopoly.

    Whenever Brits lose they change the rules, they stopped the slave trade and freed the slaves in their piddly little Caribbean countries in 1833 and compensated the slave owners.


  29. 555dubstreetOctober 13, 2020 1:46 AM

    “Let’s see how sharp the tacks on BU are”

    Showing off and mental masturbation seems to be a Bajan trait

    Barbados was primarily a slave port to America, when USA got Independence after War 1765–1783, they wanted to get their own slaves instead of British Monopoly.

    Whenever Brits lose they change the rules, they stopped the slave trade and freed the slaves in their piddly little Caribbean countries in 1833 and compensated the slave owners.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    That’s the best you can do?

    Napoleon acted in 1801/2.

    The abolition of the Slave Trade was 1807.

    Incidentally, the US abolished the slave trade in 1808!!

    Just having a little intercourse with you !!


  30. “Let’s see how sharp the tacks on BU are”
    Big fish in little ponds.
    Bajans love to boast about which school they went to especially the old men.

    No offence, but… as Brits say…
    when they come to UK, black Children are usually put in the bottom streams at school.


  31. They only abolished the slave trade in law on paper but was enacted much later, and then it was replaced with indentured slavery.

    Black males were given the right to vote in USA in 1870 15th amendment, women were given the right to vote in 1920 19th amendment

    but black men and women were still fighting for their right to vote up to 1965

    Old Jim Crow run them for another 100 years.

    Racial segregation was the order of the day like apartheid.


  32. Indeed after the right to vote was given, the US was creative in the ways they invented to disenfranchise blacks.

    http://www.umich.edu/~lawrace/disenfranchise1.htm?promocode=LIPP101AA?promocode

    Indeed, in the current election, we still see attempts at voter suppression as the administration attempts to wreck the postal service


  33. Not just a Bajan trait, 555. The Brits also boast of “the old school tie”.

    It is, in fact, a British trait that we have yet to purge from our psyche. I think it will live on in the old until they die. This administration has promised to treat to it but have yet to unveil a real treatment plan.

    As for mental masturbation – I think John is the worst case I have seen. I mostly scroll past these days as I am embarrassed for him and cannot bear to look.


  34. TheO,

    I trust you will not let them stop you.


  35. “Not just a Bajan trait, 555. The Brits also boast of “the old school tie”.”

    The “old school tie” network is simply a means to open doors for job opportunities for some but not all.
    White privileged rich people’s children are fast tracked to top managerial positions.
    White boys from Essex are recruited for biggest Global banks.

    When there were diversity drives for Blacks Asians LBGTs and Women,
    the Asians, LBGTs and Women were recruited more but not Blacks*
    Blacks who work are in the lowest jobs in Companies and move horizontally not vertically in their careers.
    Black women are recruited before Black men, Whites are still scared of Blacks.
    Usually they only have a story about a conversation they had with one a very long time ago,
    or they will make up a story that a black man said they were cool.

    (*) Token #BLM ting a ling in public discourse right now is supposed to address the black equality and opportunity gap but is probably just more dishonest self serving hot air to deflect blame


  36. People in old British Colonies are probably more British than the British, maintaining the old schools and sports club legacies without much change


  37. 555,

    And it is the same here. Just a tool to shut out some and open doors for others.

    Hopefully we will soon be rid of this blasted curse for the young generation. The old will die with it.


  38. By the way, 555, these prestigious schools were mostly populated by Bajan whites for many decades.


  39. @ Quaker John
    Paine was a Deist but became, or professed to be a Quaker because Deists were unpopular, even banned. So was Jefferson, thus the question about founding fathers. We have had the same in Barbados or similar. People who were Pentecostalists also attended the Methodist and Anglican churches to gain ‘respectability’. I know.


  40. https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


  41. 555dubstreetOctober 13, 2020 2:15 AM

    They only abolished the slave trade in law on paper but was enacted much later, and then it was replaced with indentured slavery.

    Black males were given the right to vote in USA in 1870 15th amendment, women were given the right to vote in 1920 19th amendment

    but black men and women were still fighting for their right to vote up to 1965

    Old Jim Crow run them for another 100 years.

    Racial segregation was the order of the day like apartheid.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Women sure got the short end of the stick.

    They were unable to vote period.

    Black men, because they were men, were, given the right to vote 2 to 3 generations before women of any colour.

    However it is even worse than that.

    Black men who were FREE, could vote the same as White men long before the Civil War ended slavery in the US in 1865.

    MEN OF ANY COLOUR COULD VOTE ONCE THEY POSSESSED THE QUALIFICATION TO DO SO LONG BEFORE THE CIVIL WAR BEGUN.

    So, Hal,

    Slavery was not economically untenable in America in 1833 when it was ended through Quaker efforts in Britain.

    In fact the economy slavery supported in the US was exceptionally profitable besides being economically tenable.

    Slavery did not end in the US because it was uneconomic or unprofitable.

    500,000 WHITE men and women died to end it.

    SOME, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WERE QUAKERS.

    THERE WERE ALSO SEVERAL SLAVE UPRISINGS IN AMERICA AND THESE DID NOT END SLAVERY.


  42. Hal

    Uprisings, did not end slavery in the US.

    The economy it supported was perfectly economically tenable and profitable financially.

    So what ended it in America?

    When did it end in French possessions?

    When did it end in Spanish and Portuguese possessions?

    In Dutch possessions?

    In Danish possessions?

    Why did it end in British possessions so long before any others?

    Quakers!!!

    It is the thought processes of those in power that ended slavery, and in the case of America, their personal sacrifice.


  43. Thomas Paine was raised a Quaker and perhaps became a Deist.

    What is the difference between a Quaker and a Deist?

    Are Quakers Christian?


  44. Intellectuals are often wrong!!

    Don’t always believe what they write or say if it does not make sense.


  45. Fuckwit said
    “Black men who were FREE, could vote the same as White men long before the Civil War ended slavery in the US in 1865.”

    As said previously by a wise man
    “Black males were given the right to vote in USA in 1870 15th amendment”
    To clarify the same point again the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted African American men the right to vote

    do you need your eyes tested
    or are you suffering from dementia or confusion
    should you go to bed again


  46. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_States#African_Americans_and_poor_whites

    Of this there can be no doubt. At the time of the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, all free native-born inhabitants of the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, though descended from African slaves, were not only citizens of those States, but such of them as had the other necessary qualifications possessed the franchise of electors, on equal terms with other citizens.[40]

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Read and learn.

    Same in Barbados.

    Free MEN of COLOUR could vote during slavery once they possessed the necessary qualifications.

    WHITE MEN who did not possess the qualification, like BLACK MEN, could not vote.

    Simple fact of history.


  47. WOMEN, even though they may have possessed the qualification could not vote, … because they were women.

    The SUFFRAGETTE movement changed that.

    If you look at the earliest SUFFRAGETTES, you will find they were QUAKERESSES!!


  48. @Quaker John

    October 13, 2020 7:14 AM

    Hal

    Uprisings, did not end slavery in the US….(Quote)

    I am sure you think it is clever, but you must stop and take seriously who you are talking to. You have a dirty habit of not discussing what is said to you, but manufacturing your own issues and posting answers to them.
    It is silly and boring, not clever and says a lot about you. Plse remind me where I said ‘Uprisings ended slavery’.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading