Last week the four main opposition political parties announced they will combine forces to support one candidate in the by-election to be held on the 11 November 2020 in St. George North. Leading political commentator @budavid described the move has “shrewd”and one that finally demonstrated a level of political maturity not witnessed since universal suffrage in the Caribbean.

When asked to elaborate by international foreign affairs correspondent @Pachamama, @budavid indicated adversarial politics was the vestige of a colonial past and had demonstrably failed to optimally define the people of the island state of Barbados. He stated, “we are a homogenous society and a consensus type of politics should be the alternative to determine the future of our small predominantly Black nation- and to ensure the hopes of a proud small island developing state are realised and fears are assuaged“.

The entrenched incumbent political party has implemented and supported a raft of polices on winning office which have weakened the voice of the opposition and served to destabilize the system of governance as envisaged by the framers of the Westminster system which the country has parodied. Two polices continuing to attract scathing critique from the BU intelligentsia are the politics of co-option and the reluctance of the incumbent and entrenched government to relax the rule governing a subvention for opposition political parties.

And the politics of inclusion practised by the incumbent party reared its head again last week with the head of the largest trade union fast tracked for membership in a record setting one week to support her candidature in St. George North. The leader of the incumbent party admitted party rules had to be ‘abridged’ to accommodate the new member.

The incumbent political party has dismissed repeated calls to relax the rule that prevents a subvention to political parties who have not faced the electorate. @budavid recently reminded the prime minister from the #barbados_underground that she had a “duty of care” as primus inter pares and guardian of our democracy to be bipartisan when treating with certain matters. She was also reminded that there was no hesitation by the government she represents to amend the Constitution for less important matters as reflected in Hansard.

The shrew decision of the Opposition parties to coalesce behind the candidate with the best chance to win has resonated across Barbados and resulted in the needle on the Political Apathy Index (PAI) shifting +10 – the most significant movement in 40 years. A desirable outcome of the tectonic shift in political sentiment has resulted in the redundancy of political pollsters.

That the political system has mechanisms by which political parties can reach a compromise even though they disagree on policies. In Sweden, difficult issues are sent to a commission on which all the parties and key interest groups are represented in order to reach an agreement, and, in Austria, Government, business and the trade unions agree on the main economic policies and the left and right parties accept what has been agreed.

Britpolitics

@budavid throws his support behind the move by the main opposition parties to embrace a consensus style of politics and hopes that it will be the catalyst for a transformation event to a consensus style of democracy. For too long the hopes and aspirations of a proud people have been superseded by the paramountcy of the political party.

369 responses to “Opposition Parties Reach Compromise to Run One Candidate in St. George North By Election”


  1. What the so called opposition should do is refuse to take part in an election called by a the 30 zeroes.

    29-1 and 28-2 are still mock results.


  2. Caswell part should be played for all Barbadians to hear


  3. The unification of the opposition shows once again that they are seeking a dictatorship with a single party on a single list.

    We do not need democratic bickering in these difficult times.

    In view of the pandemic, it would be best to cancel the elections. Our leader Mia Mottley should appoint the new MP by emergency legislation on her own.

  4. Critical Analyzer Avatar
    Critical Analyzer

    @David
    The post also had me confused as I have not been interested in or following anything to do with the by election.

    As far as I am concerned it is an attempt by our PM to take Owen Arthur’s brain child known as the politics of inclusion to the next level.

    I am glad I am in South and not North because I would have great difficulty supporting Toni Moore after she supposedly just joined the party based on Mia’s recommendation and bypass other longstanding members that would have been vying to contest the seat. St. George is only a safe seat if you treat the St. George people with respect otherwise one known, good St. Georgian bred candidate from a serious party would gain support fast.

    Gline was elected as MP for a full term and I firmly believe no sitting MP should abdicate their seat unless it is on medical or personal grounds and not to take up another post.

    On the matter of the topic at hand. It would be the best thing of all the third parties to form a coalition now and try to seize the opportunity to gain some ground before the DLP rebuilds itself and seek to garner more support over the next 10-12 years to stand a chance at being a true third party and not somebody’s tax break for claiming political party contributions on their income tax.

    BLP has another term for sure and most likely will get a third term unless they something monumentally stupid which I don’t see happening so now is definitely the time for all third parties to come together.


  5. isnt UPP a collation?


  6. Reifer is a good candidate for the dlp. He should be able to increase the votes from last election. IF he dont then DEM in real dodo

  7. William Skinner Avatar

    The major problem with the third parties, as it was with the NDP, is a serious lack of hard work. They don’t believe in building constituency branches or having a sustained political ground game. What were they doing for the past two years- depending on occasional newspaper columns and face book?
    One thing I learned is that the BLPDLP can quickly mobilize; after all they have been at this thing for seventy years or so.
    Note that although the DLP is still or was almost in a coma how quickly its fortunes have changed: Depeiza is solidified and there is an apparently good candidate in SGN.
    Note how quickly Mottley bounced back after being kicked to the political curb by Arthur.
    Quite frankly the third parties have to prepare themselves for at least ten years of sustained political effort before they can land a seat or two.
    Unless they are prepared to do that, when opportunities like SGN come along , they will have no real presence at the constituency level.
    I would like to be proven wrong but it’s not likely. I wish them luck in SGN but they should have been better prepared. First order of business after SGN should be to set up constituency
    branches in St Andrew , St Thomas and St Michael East and by the middle of 2021 they should have branches and candidates in each constituency.
    Anything less than that will be almost futile.


  8. William, The major problem with the third parties, as it was with the NDP, is a serious lack of hard work. They don’t believe in building constituency branches or having a sustained political ground game
    ++++++++

    Bit naive there. All of that takes money. Where are they to get it? From the same sources as those who fuel the others?

    That is why I suggested to replace the constituency model for voting, it enables corruption, at both supply and demand.

    Sure, the new model will still require parties to spend nationally, but, it will make it harder to influence a group of voters by specific location.

    A national model of selection of representatives should be the aim.

    As David said, it will be resisted by the two traditional parties, because the current model allows them control and targeted spending.

    But this is the only way to achieve the necessary ‘open vote’.

    The NDP failed because they only had one viable candidate, Sir Richard Haynes, who won his seat. Plus, yes, money spent by the others.

    This can be overcome with viable candidates, but the national voting model will make such a possibility stronger.

  9. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Crusoe
    To say that the NDP had only one viable candidate is quite off the mark. Buyer, Bourne and Miller were all sitting MPs. You may not believe this but the BLP approached : Randall Worrel, Rommel Marshall, Vere Brathwaite and myself immediately after the 1991 elections to consider being candidates the next time around. Rommel Marshall accepted and won a seat. Young , at the time, Ian Gooding Edghill ,managed Marshall’s campaign , as a young national in 1991 and went over to the BLP with him. Today he represents that constituency.
    Quite frankly ,in 1991, the NDP had a good slate of candidates but a lot happened after that.
    That’s all I need to say for now.


  10. William SkinnerOctober 4, 2020 1:14 AM Point taken.

    Then, from what you say, the constituency model and its implications are even worse for the country than I thought. Because it creates an environment wherein no individual or party can win on the basis of principles and policy, only on money.

  11. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Crusoe
    Money is very important. However, in order to attract money, candidates and parties must have proper organization at the constituency level. Financiers back those who look like they can win. Even if they lose their money, they want to ensure it’s not wasted. Nobody can lecture me about what the lack of money can do to a candidate regardless of principles etc.
    An opposing candidate in 1991 told me that I really did not have the money to be competitive. He did not say so in any insulting manner but I appreciated his frankness. There are a lot of people who believed that the NDP had three or four money trees in the yard but I did not see them.
    A candidate embarking on contesting a constituency has therefore to be realistic. If you are short on funds and cannot finance a branch office and the out of pocket canvassing needs, your only hope for a good shot is trying to utilize schools, church halls and community centers for your constituency meetings. Sometimes you find a party supporter with a residence that can be used.
    I think the third parties are starved of funds and they believe they can wait a few months before a general election. If you doubt me , try having a talk with Hamilton Lashley. I often tell people he is by far the most successful politician in Barbados since independence. His entire political career was built on community work. Lashley was by no means a financially well off candidate and he would be the first to tell you that. The man is a political genius but when the so called political scientists and commentators are talking he is just Hammie La from the Pine. Snobbery at all levels is engrained in our society.
    Peace.


  12. “Caswell part should be played for all Barbadians to hear”

    Caswell at a POLITICAL meeting for a by-election? I thought the BU mob proclaimed him to be apolitical and therefore dissimilar to Toni Moore, as a workers’ union leader and politician?
    I may have missed it, but has the BU transparency warriors questioned Reifer’s selection like they did Moore’s–party membership, branch involvement etc? Just asking.🤣🤣


  13. @enuff

    Not following you.

    Senator Caswell is not a political candidate.

    Reifer was selected by the constituency and accepted by the executive compared to Moore who was handpicked by the prime minister.

    Moore in still an independent Senator notwithstanding Ezra Alleyne’s column doing damage control, people perception matter.

    Reifer is not the head of the largest trade union in Barbados and the entanglement that is attached.

    The concerns listed are not exhaustive.


  14. Blp showing signs of nervousness
    Reifer seems to be batting well in SGN

  15. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Blp showing signs of nervousness
    Reifer seems to be batting well in SGN

    Mariposa

    You just saying so, or you could back it up with some sort of proof?


  16. The PM is a bully and liar she cannot be trusted
    Her words have become shallow
    Her last salvo at Caswell will not help as social media has taken strong disgust against her lies and her various ways of seeking political opportunism


  17. Michael.Campbell all across social media the response towards Reifer has been positive
    So far what i have witnessed are luke warmed responses for Moore people eyes are wakening up to the reality of Moore looking out for herself


  18. Mariposa so you wish.The BLP getting nervous about what a rookie politician in Mr Reifer? While i agree he has national profile as a cricketer and is a household name in St George what has he done as a political figure?I agree he is a good choice perhaps the best decision the dems have made since the Barrow era snd i wish him the best.
    On another note i now see why Lest we forget wss asking me what was the problem with Greene being a Dem because he seems to be one too.I got your angle now.As for the monsense ppsted by Skinner about Mr Lashley being a political genius really? I think you mean he was a political grasshopper with no loyalty to any one but himself in my view.He difd help a lot of people edpecially in the pine but his actions politically were not of someone to be emulated in my opinion.Finally most people viewed the NDP as a one man party and the fact that only Dr Haynes won a seat justifies that view.


  19. Lorenzo
    Moore had two years in parliament to do something for the peoplev
    My question to u what has she done for the people in two years
    Bring me the proof
    Reifer might be a political novice but when trust is measured against Moore and himself
    Moore becomes the biggest loser
    Moore now finds herself caught smack into the middle of self serving politics an area which is detrimental in helping her to win the election


  20. Have a great day Barbados.
    Here is a simple song for you.
    https://youtu.be/vZKjjlZmR4Y

  21. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Mariposa, what you should be asking yourself is if the people you talking about that across social media, LIVE in or ELIGIBLE to VOTE in SGN.

    That is an important question.

    As long as those people can’t vote in SGN, don’t care how much positive response they give Refer get across social media, it is a waste of time.

  22. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Moore had two years in parliament to do something for the people

    Mariposa, you for real? What foolishness you talking?

    Moore in the Senate as an independent senator, not as a member of parliament representing a consistency.

    Since when senators have to do something for people?

    Or you want to tell me which constituency vote her in that she ain’t do nothing for them in two years?

    Mariposa, you does just talk bare ignorance when you ready.


  23. @Lorenzo,

    no need to agonise where my political sentiments lie. i have said it often enuff. where do yours lie? or are you another of the neutral posters?


  24. Michael Campbell u might not care
    But many loud voices combined can make a huge difference and sway in politics
    Right now. Mottley utterances are under attack
    Moore sitting as an Independent senator and a candidate for the blp is being delivered several blows in media columns
    If this trend continues Mia strength in her words would be diminished as influence to help Moore
    Moore cannot hold her own giving her last two years track record as Senator for the people


  25. Moore’s independence was a charade. this plan was wrought when she drank the red koolaid and swallowed the BLP pill, rejected the DLP 49 mil and concessions holding out for 23%, marched with MAM, the Private Sector and the gang and then accepted 5% after 2 minutes of negotiations with MAM.

    for its part the private sector got tax concessions etc and $300 mil, the workers got 5%, taxes and BOSS, and Moore got a so called safe seat. the senate gig which is granted to union representatives was to give her a feel of politics.

    the politics of collusion.

  26. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Mariposa, tell us what is Moore’s track record in the Senate.

    Do you know if she supported all the Bills the government to to the Senate?

    Or how many Bills she opposed that had to be returned to the lower house?


  27. Enuff
    You must admit that Caswell Franklyn is proving to be very uncomfortable to the BLP. If the PM offer him a Job as he says for $16000 a month and be over all of the Permanent Secretaries, that tells you all. She was trying to tie him down and keep him quiet. So the issue is why would she attack him for $400 knowing that she offered him a Job for that kind on money. His statement about Mrs. Moore and her voting for the NIS legislation to disadvantage workers should be discussed by the financial persons on this blog who can shed some light on the topic for persons like me to understand. To me that is what these blogs should be about and not petty name calling.


  28. Michael

    Listen for the made up excuses after the lost,


  29. Never mind Reifer being a novice
    Tbis bi-election hinges on trust
    Moore has a huge factor of mistrust which csn be effectively exploited and skilfully used against her
    Also her two year record of voting on govt sides fails to insure that she has the best interest of the people


  30. John2
    What is your position on Mrs Moore voting with the Government on the NIS legislation to the disadvantage of the workers she represents?


  31. On another topic which highlights the inadequacies of the BLP government and the previous incumbents, take a look at the short article from today’s Nation.
    https://www.nationnews.com/2020/09/30/humphrey-promises-flood-fix/

    Browne’s Avenue, Bayville, St Michael is supposedly an area that is “prone” to flooding. A 15 minute outbreak of rain which measured a MERE 20 – 40 mm was SUFFICIENT to flood this location. Apparently this so-called flood attracted our esteemed Prime Minister and her minister Wilfred Abrahams to pay the area a visit. They wanted to witness the “INCONVENIENCE” caused by this flooding to the local citizens.

    Mr Abrahams indicated that a contractor had been found and that the problem would be fixed. He stated that the perennial problem of flooding to the area would be terminated.

    When one reads such a story one can confer with Hal Austin’s jibe that Barbados is a failed state.

    What does this story reveal to us. Firstly, our infrastructure is inadequate and poorly serviced. Does this area have drainage; is it adequate; how often is it repaired? How long have these conditions been on the ground? And does it take a Prime Minister and a Minister to visit an area in order for work to be carried out.


  32. Michael Campbell Read Greene comment at 8. 30
    There is no way that Mia can explain away Moore’s record against the workers best interest in the past two years
    Moore’s name is now a house hold name but for the wrong reasons
    Lorenzo cannot defend her
    Nor can the PM
    She has boxed herself into the politics of self interest with no way out

  33. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Also her two year record of voting on govt sides fails to insure that she has the best interest of the people

    Mariposa, do you know that Franklyn and Drakes voted on government side? Do you know that independent senators Monique Taitt and Kevin Boyce are DEMS and they voted on government side? Do you know that all the other independent senators voted on government side?

    So, what you trying to tell us is that if senators believe something the government bring is for the benefit of the people and they vote for it, that means they don’t have people interest at heart?

    It looks like that in your world, voting against government means they are ensuring the best interest of the people.

    And I going a bit further. I bet if the DLP was in power and senators vote against government, you will say they are not ensuring the best interest of the people.

    Mariposa, you does come with some foolish arguments.


  34. LWF

    The only vote i am aware of that Moore made in the senate is the last one where she didnt vote..

    if the workers think she is voting again them then they have the power of the ballot.


  35. The fact she abstained means she did not agree with the integrity bill as presented. If she is elected will government include her concern in the amended Bill?

    >


  36. David

    i assume that there will be amendment/s made to the bill. However weather she is in the house or the senate the bill can be passed without her voting for it.


  37. It is not a matter of if the Bill will pass, it will be if she expresses herself on the backbench if her recommendation is not included. We know collective responsibility of cabinet will see her keeping her mouth shut if she is appointed to cabinet.

    >


  38. @TLSN

    Only a few days ago I wrote on BU that Barbados was due a once in a 100 years flood. It is not prophecy. The last major flood we had was in 1949, and before that back in the 19th century.
    It is clear that one will come sooner than later, especially given the degradation of the environment. When it comes we will see water rushing through the old gullies, and although I hope not, causing lives.
    And, no matter who is in power, there will be talk of a ‘shock’ when in reality it should have been planned for. It will take us back to the filling in of the Constitution river and the lack of clearing in the gullies.
    There is a lack of sound planning.


  39. Floyd at the crease
    Moore nowhere to be seen
    Gline Clarke record cant save Moore
    She got to bat on her own
    Her record shows a failure for the people interest in the past two years
    Cheers to Reifer a man of the soil

    https://www.facebook.com/106263061242805/posts/114356787100099/

  40. Carson C Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C Cadogan

    ARTAX

    The investigation was completed by the then AG.

    It showed the person is not possession of a any Legal Certificate which one needs to practice LAW IN Barbados but it was NEVER made a public document. There are I think about 5 others in a similar situation.

    Including a JUDGE WHO SITS ON THE BENCH. The DLP did not to pursue this case because some others would get hurt.


  41. Franklyn and Drakes has a record of openly being opposed to govt policies when it comes to the people of barbados
    Franklyn has more than on one occasion call govt for passing legislation that was not giving full transparency within parliament
    Has yet to hear Moores voicing such concerns since in Parliament Boss comes to mind and the NIS and severance pay
    Moore has become muted and a coward since becoming a Senator


  42. David
    Enlighten me.Is the integrity bill the same as the National Insurance change in terms of going to the tribunal?


  43. David

    i cannot tell if/ what will be included in the next bill i have not clue


  44. A few years ago an English actor was accused of rape in Barbados. He was represented by a Monserrat-born English lawyer who was educated and trained in the UK.
    Why was she allowed to practice in Barbados? A few years ago when UWI was thinking of opening a London campus, I was asked to speak to the Vice-Chancellor Dr Harris and agreed. Before we met, I sent him an email outlining my ideas , one of which was providing a LEC course.
    My thinking was that a number of UK lawyers, a relative of mine included, would do the course simply to give themselves another tool in their kit, but they would not travel to Mona or St Augustine to do so. I was not disinvited, but I was not told any more about meeting.
    There are a number of questions to ask: is an LEC necessary to practice in Barbados? If so, what is the legislation? What is the purpose of an LEC, is its use only to appear before a judge in open court, or are there other reasons for this? Does one need an LEC to give legal advice in private? Why is the UWI protecting lawyers when its job is wholly education and training?


  45. Two month of political activity = money turning over in the economy – MM too smart!

    it would have be politically wiser to have a shorter period but economic wiser to stretch it out. the economy need the help and the seat safe.


  46. Hope all the opposing Candidates boycott the debates
    How can Mia even entertain debates having a candidate wearing two hates
    What boldfaced deception


  47. To be a politician in a constituency like SGN you must follow trends of the constituency. The people are saying it is a parochial election about hometown people and a debate on TV is not necessary. GPII seems not to want votes in SGN because he was on CBC news last night thanking the PM for her political maturity in offering debates. I do not know if that is a good strategy for him at this time.Go out and knock on doors.

  48. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    Almost three years ago she promised to bring to Parliament her Qualification like Dr. Dennis Lowe who she challenged did.

    She never did.


  49. mari

    hahaaaaa if i had to read everything in a video to introduce myself i would stay away from debates too and espacially against miss moore

    good catch by you

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading