Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

It is generally accepted that there are many benefits to allowing immigrants into a small country reportedly struggling with the financial and social pressures caused by an ageing population.

One of the principal benefits, in theory, is that immigrants entering the Barbadian space can infuse the labour force with new skills, entrepreneurial energy, and investment capital. This can help generate new businesses and economic activity. More importantly, an increase in the working age population can strengthen contributions to the National Insurance and Social Security Service (NISSS), which faces demographic pressures as the population ages we have been repeated informed.

However, there are also significant downsides and challenges. Increased immigration can place additional pressure on Barbados’ already fragile infrastructure. Housing is an obvious example, with rising rents being attributed, in part, to demand from Welcome Stampers and Ross University students. There are also concerns about pothole ridden roads, an overburdened electricity grid, water supply systems, and public transportation, among other services.

It is therefore important for Barbados to implement a rigorous screening process to ensure that immigrants undergo rigorous background checks and that their qualifications and skills are verified before being granted entry. While it may border on xenophobia to single out any particular country, public concerns about fraud and other forms of criminal activity from certain countries should not be dismissed outright. Policymakers must strike a balance between avoiding unfair stereotypes and addressing legitimate security concerns.

The Blogmaster had expressed a similar perspective regarding previous debates about unbridled immigration from Guyana. The central issue is not whether Barbados should welcome African brothers and sisters, or immigrants generally. Rather, the question is how many people can be accommodated, under what rules, and with what level of preparation.

A small island like Barbados requires immigration policies that are aligned with housing availability, infrastructure capacity, environmental considerations, specific labour market needs, and the country’s ability to successfully integrate newcomers into society.

It is noteworthy that, in a relatively short period, Barbadians have been confronted with reports concerning “Chidi Uzomba, a Nigerian national who is wanted for questioning in connection with a serious criminal matter.” The Blogmaster joins the Barbados Police Service (BPS) in urging anyone with relevant information to assist without delay.

Barbados is already grappling with serious crime and a growing sense of lawlessness. The focus should therefore remain on ensuring that criminal elements, regardless of their nationality, are identified and removed from society before they can further undermine public safety.

Let us be vigilant. Let us act.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

12 responses to “Barbados on alert as Chidi Uzomba, a Nigerian national is hunted by the police”


  1. Generally agreed!

    However, this whole project was approached with hastiness and beligerance by Mia Mottley.

    We would have thought that the dearth in real production in Barbados could not have extended to human reproduction as a national project, as the preferred choice.

    But Mottley, like a gravedigger thought it best to find a readymade solution instead of first trying to solve the root causes of the problem in a way which would have engendered a productivist consciousness within the Bajan population.

    Instead, Barbados under the misleadership of Mia Mottley has made a number of choices, including mass immigration, which singularly or collectively will forever chance the character of the country in ways that can never be repaired. And nobody should have such a right!

    In doing so, she’s made a prophet of her uncle Errol who warned us that one day this very thing will happen. And she will fail spectacularly. For very few places in the world ever manage to attract the best of other countries citizens, in numbers.

    Mottley’s best friends are in the leadership of the European Union. Maybe she should have studied their experiences with mass immigration as a perceived corrective to population decline. Inevitably, all kinds of new or more intractable problems come to the fore as the downward spiral takes over.


  2. Change


  3. The US Secretary of War wants to livestream the execition of Nidal Hasan said to have gun down 13 people on a military base.

    Recently, there was a Tennesee woman who was sentenced to death by lethal injection and the execution was botched, twice. No doubt they will try again.

    Drumpf, has bragged about killing innocent fishermen, thousands of Iranians. But not a word in objection from certain quarters.

    We’ve seen in Saudi Arabia beheadings are conducted routinely but these are not offensive to those seeing themselves as respectable.*

    It’s all well and good for White and their friends to impose all manner of cruelty but if Pacha had to even feign the same in their direction to some here that would not be like the MLK everybody else must pretend to be.


  4. “The Blogmaster had expressed a similar perspective regarding previous debates about unbridled immigration from Guyana.”

    @ David

    Perhaps a similar perspective SHOULD also be expressed regarding unbridled immigration from Jamaica as well.


  5. @Artax

    Since the Myrie issue when Barbados government was rapped by the CCJ, there seems to be a reluctance to address the labour supple to the red light areas from Jamaica especially.


  6. @ David

    I’ll be blunt. There are TOO MANY Jamaicans in Barbados.

    The usual ‘go to response’ is that there are Barbadians living in other countries, with references often made to USA, UK, Canada and the other ‘big countries.’
    However, those persons should be reminded that Barbados is 166 square miles, with a limited job market and an already strained social services.

    Smaller islands such as Antigua & Barbuda, Bermuda, Cayman Islands and St. Vincent, for example, manage immigration, while Barbados allows ‘every Tom, Dick and Harry’ to enter, reside and work in this island, while their children attend government schools.

    We’re essentially attracting low skilled individuals who cannot make any significant contribution to the development of Barbados, or financial investment therein.
    Yet they’re benefitting from health care, primary to tertiary level education and social services.

    Antigua & Barbuda decided to opt out of the full freedom of movement and to maintain instead, the current CARICOM Skills Certificate policy.
    According to that island’s Ambassador to CARICOM, Dr. Clarence Henry, A&B attracts thousands of people from the region, many of whom fall outside of the list of professions from which people are allowed to immigrate to the island.
    To go the full route of freedom of movement would open up the floodgates for more people to travel to A&B and this would place unbearable stains on the island’s social services.
    Dr. Henry explained, “We cannot afford to adopt a regime of free movement for all persons. The carrying capacity would be overburdened; our social services will be overrun, and at the same time it is also contemplated that we would have to build new hospital facilities and educational facilities which would cost the government millions of dollars; expenditures the country cannot afford at this time.”


  7. @Artax

    Barring an uprising Mottley like her predecessor has anchored her legacy to freedom of movement. In her case, unbridled.

    It was limited to the Caricom region, of lately, Africa.


  8. Based on this report we have some bigger fish to fry. What has undergirded a stable Barbados society in the past, has been a trustworthy justice system.

    Pilgrim points out ‘flaw’ in judicial system

    Senior counsel Andrew Pilgrim is considering legal action should a glaring discrepancy in the court system continue to go unaddressed.

    The veteran attorney is crying foul over the practice of magistrates being promoted and leaving all their cases open, with the only recourse being to start them over.

    “It is understood that once a magistrate starts a trial, no other magistrate or judge can come in and say, ‘all right, I can finish this off’. It has to be restarted,” he told the media during a briefing at his Whitepark Road, St Michael office yesterday.

    In this case, he is speaking about the elevation of former Chief Magistrate Douglas Frederick to a judge of the newly established gun court.

    This, he said, has left him holding the proverbial bag, adding he was likely not the only attorney in the same predicament.

    “The problem that we have is that whenever there’s this need to transfer or promote someone, it seems to me, and I speak subject to correction, that often when people are transferred, they’re transferred leaving behind a number of cases which need to be addressed.

    “So for example, I have a case in which I’m working for the victim of a crime, and this case has spent seven years before Mr Frederick and in that seven-year period, that case has reached a stage where the accused has been found guilty. Now, Mr Frederick is promoted; he is no longer a magistrate, and he cannot now sentence that person who has been found guilty. This case will have to go back to the beginning, and my client will face a waiting period presumably of another seven years to get justice in this matter. That cannot be fair,” he said.

    The Senior Counsel said this was not the only similar matter he had pending and suggested a solution should be found within the Constitution.

    “Instinctively I feel like my reference point would be the Constitution. In other words, I would approach it from that point of view, if I have to approach it, because I think that the powers that be ought to see this situation and say, ‘all right, let’s just make sure that we get all these cases finished’. I think

    that’s just the right thing to do.

    “I don’t want to sue anybody for this to be made right, but if I do, I would be approaching it from the perspective of the Constitution where I have a right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. Where I’ve reached the doorstep of having my matter completed, only to be told my magistrate was so good he’s now being promoted, and I have to start fresh from zero,” he said.

    Pilgrim said his next steps would be to see if any remedy was found in the court system or, failing that, pursue one himself.

    “I think that a remedy would have to be sought through the courts that asks the question, ‘How do you deliver justice to me in this situation?’ If, for example, the client who is the complainant is saying a court has found this person guilty after this period of time, I was due for perhaps compensation; government compensate me then, if you don’t want to send back the magistrate to do the work, compensate me, you pay me for the damage that I have suffered that a court found this person was guilty and responsible for, you provide me that damage.

    “That’s what needs to happen, so then I would say yes, that is what I will pursue,” he said.

    When contacted, Minister of Legal Affairs and Criminal Justice Michael Lashley yesterday referred the media to the office of the Chief Justice.

    However, speaking on Starcom Network News Lashley said he was moving swiftly to examine reforms to address the jurisdictional issues raised. ( CA)

    Source: Nation


  9. @ David
    The WHOLE court system is a SHAM.
    Justice is the VERY LAST item in their list of priorities,
    and that list is HEADED by an item called …’POLITICAL Interests’.

    Did you note an article in last Sunday Sun that was flying a kite about a ‘new rate case’ being lodged by De Lectrick company?
    Seems that this move will NULIFY the ongoing case , which has been ongoing now for YEARS… and is stuck in court.

    Dat sounds right to you?

    Did the FTC not grant interim rate increases?
    Did the Lectrick company not appeal the decisions of the FTC?
    Is the matter not stuck (as expected) before some judge?
    Is there not some issue of $99+ MILLION dollars that Emera tek up, that the FTC says have to be put back…?

    Don’t you smell a rat?

    The only REAL questions are:
    1 – When will the funeral service for ‘Justice’ be held?
    2 – Will a State Funeral be granted? …and
    3 – Where exactly will the carcass be interred (Bushie is guessing at the Garrison – under the pitchfork planted there by Froon…

    What a place!
    Good catch by Pilgrim.


  10. @Bush Tea

    Yes. It is all coordinated to support the establishment.

  11. A Discussion but not Dissing or Cussing Avatar
    A Discussion but not Dissing or Cussing

    <Blockquote>

    While it may border on xenophobia to single out any particular country, public concerns about fraud and other forms of criminal activity from certain countries should not be dismissed outright. Policymakers must strike a balance between avoiding unfair stereotypes and addressing legitimate security concerns.

    The Blogmaster had expressed a similar perspective regarding previous debates about unbridled immigration from Guyana.

    @ David

    Perhaps a similar perspective SHOULD also be expressed regarding unbridled immigration from Jamaica as well.

    </Blockquote>

    The general stereotype trope in the West is

    “Blacks are criminals”

    This taught thinkin’ has become a truism in peoples minds along with “Blacks are lazy” “Blacks are rapists” and other some such.

    In USA Police think they can stop and check any black male (and female) and if they claim they haven’t got a police record then they must be lying.

    <Blockquote>

    Barbados immigration statistics for 2024 was 35,187, a 0.91% increase from 2020.

    Barbados immigration statistics for 2010 was 32,825, a 7.19% increase from 2005.

    Barbados immigration statistics for 2020 was 34,869, a 1.14% increase from 2015.

    Barbados immigration statistics for 2015 was 34,475, a 5.03% increase from 2010.

    </Blockquote>

    I think these numbers are total immigrants not new immigrants

    it seems that they are steady not increasing exponentially

    so don’t believe the hype

    <blockquote>

    Smaller islands such as Antigua & Barbuda, Bermuda, Cayman Islands and St. Vincent, for example, manage immigration, while Barbados allows ‘every Tom, Dick and Harry’ to enter, reside and work in this island, while their children attend government schools.

    We’re essentially attracting low skilled individuals who cannot make any significant contribution to the development of Barbados, or financial investment therein.
    Yet they’re benefitting from health care, primary to tertiary level education and social services.

    </blockquote>

    The children of today are the men and women of tomorrow.

    Immigrants can often come in at the bottom level but each generation rises to another level.

    Ist generation immigrants may be toilet cleaners, manual labourers,

    2nd generation can be teachers, doctors, nurses, politicians

    3rd generation can be CEO’s, professors, leaders of nations

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending