Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The dust has settled on the St. James North by election. As predicted by all and sundry including Barbados UndergroundA redundant St. James North by election – Chad Blackman of the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) destroyed the main challenger Felicia Dujon of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) by capturing 2 723 votes to 468.

The St. James North is supported by the numbers as a BLP stronghold and running Dujon, who has been one of the more visible members of the DLP, must be seen as an error in political strategy. Surely Ralph Thorne and his minions were aware Dujon would be nothing more than a sacrificial lamb by naming her a candidate?

Of interest to political pundits is the opportunity to observe the national swing indicator. It is normal to expect a movement away from government after two or three terms. However, we are not operating in normal times are we.

Truth is, there is still the pall of the Ronnie Yearwood vs Ralph Thorne clash hanging over the DLP. The BLP winning St. James North seat must be assessed against the public perception of a beleaguered DLP trying to find its way. The blogmaster is of the view voters preferred to go with the status quo rather than risk the uncertainty of the ‘unknown’. It does not mean DLP would NOT have won had all things been equal but the by election would have generated traditional stats for analysis.

All post election commentary is centred on the need for the DLP to get its house in order. Hopefully the ‘poor’ performance in the St. James North by election will encourage sober reflection in George Street. One thing the result has confirmed is that the DLP is not seen as a credible alternative – although Barbadians maybe fearful of a one party state. This week was an opportunity to signal to the ruling BLP its discomfort with the lack of opposition representation in the Lower House. Unfortunately the DLP and the other candidates did not engender the confidence of the electorate. This should be a deep concern for Barbadians..

One suspects were a general election to be held tomorrow, the result will be the same give or take a seat or two. The BLP would inflict another shellacking on the opposition. This would be more to do with an inadequate political opposition rather than voters being happy with the performance of the incumbent BLP government. Barbados maybe headed to a crisis of governance in the not too distant future.

One cannot directly blame Prime Minister Mottley or the late Owen Arthur for aggressively practicing the politics of inclusion. However, it should not be ignored any fallout from the strategy which weakened opposition ‘talent’. What it exposes is the lack of a differentiating philosophy between the two main political parties exemplified in the political leader of the DLP. First a DLPite, then a BLPite now a DLPite. There is no law against crossing the floor in Barbados but there is a good case that it challenges the perception of politicians by an apathetic electorate.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

119 responses to “DLP rejected, again”


  1. “First a DLPite, then a BLPite now a DLPite.”

    D to B to D Pattern = Lose to Win … to Lose?

    7 X 7
    7 times to rise
    7 times to fall

    You got to be in it
    If you want to win it, win it
    You cannot be a sinner
    You gotta be a winner, winner

    You gotta know the bitter
    To enjoy the sweeter, sweeter
    You know you cannot fake it
    You just gotta make it, make it

    So if you’re mediocre
    Then you are a joker, joker
    So take in to the zenith
    Cause you got no limit, limit

    So leap up, you’re the runner
    You gotta be a planner
    Living more than lies
    The upful lifetime

    When you get up on
    Worst fall you’ll be rising

    Seven, seven time, seven
    Seven, seven, seven time, seven
    So hear the words of the angels
    Let us come down to the ages
    Take them and live
    Use them, digest them, respect them
    For us they were good yesterday
    They are still good today
    And forever


  2. WHO CARES??? WHO GIVES A TOSS??? THE COUNTRY IS ALREADY DOOMED & THE MASSES* CONSIGNED TO THE TRASH-HEAP OF A SLAVISH NARRATIVE

    #PointlessExercisesInFutility

    #SadCommentary

    HERE IS WHAT TRUE POWERFUL INTERVENTION LOOKS LIKE


  3. Gasoline price bbd $3.95 = $2.69 cad.

    In Toronto average 136.9 cad.


  4. @Hants

    The people can use the $300.00 solidarity allowance to offset cost.


  5. STOP WORSHIPPING ALBINO-CENTRIC MESSIAHS* & THEIR MACHIAVELLIAN DEMOCRACTIC MIRAGE CLOTHES IN SKULLDUGGERY, SCAM* & SOPHISTRY


  6. The bigger picture is having a unanimous 30-0 government large and fully in charge when barely 3 out of 10 eligible persons in the country / constituency voted for them.

    Just observing


  7. @Observing

    The two main political parties agree the voters list needs some work and the PM referenced the need for an enumeration exercise to be done.


  8. Why did Ralph Thorne select Felicia Dujon to be shared? No available viables among the flock?
    DLP must calibrate from the top. Ralph, Mia and her BLP act in full accordance with the wishes of her people.


  9. RAT NEED TO GO !
    Backward progress since RAT got on board. RAT ON THE PARTY is similar or worse than Sinclair economics / Stuart leadership.

    TRON was right

  10. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    @Tony May 23, 2025 at 2:35 pm “Why did Ralph Thorne select Felicia Dujon to be shared?”

    Maybe it is easier to sacrifice a l’l woman?

    Maybe none of these previously named MEN relished the idea of having their political balls chopped off by the Big Man Chad Blackman:

    Nathaniel Boyce
    Andrew Cave
    Simon Clarke
    David Estwick
    Paul Gibson
    Ensley Grainger
    Roleric Hinds
    Shaquani Hunte
    Neil Marshall
    Jason Phillips
    Randall Rouse
    Dale Rowe
    Richard Sealy
    Pedro Shepherd
    Alvin Toppin
    David Waldron
    Ryan Walters
    Andre Worrell

  11. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    John2 May 23, 2025 at 6:25 pm “Backward progress.”

    Going backwards is REGRESS not backward progress.

  12. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    Maybe none of these named female candidates women relished being thrown into the RED political furnace either:

    Malissa Howard
    Amoy Gilding Bourne
    Dawn Marie Armstrong


  13. The DLP announced 15 candidates in Jan 2015.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2025/01/21/dlp-vows-strong-alternative-to-govt-names-first-15-candidates/

    Let us try to be serious with the comments.

  14. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    The past is past.

    Moving forward, the DLP should have started canvassing in St. Thomas yesterday. The good Ms. Forde is 74, has given yeo[wo]man service to the BLP. What if she doesn’t want to stay on much longer? Is the DLP going to wait until a few days before, before canvassing the people of St. Thomas?

  15. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    The DLP may well rise again, but in my opinion that is unlikely to happen while Thorne is leader, but don’t mind me, I know nothing about serious politics.

    Cuhdear Bajan, neither B nor D.


  16. “Thorne: We will have good days again”

    DLP’s most feasible opportunity would be if multiple crises hit the nation
    and they offered themselves to be the Disaster Recovery option


  17. St. Thomas is another BLP stronghold.

  18. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    All the more reason to start courting the citizens of St. Thomas early. Because if the DLP does not, then the BLP will.


  19. Why would ANY candidate OF VALUE –
    Who do NOT NEED a ‘guvament’ salary…
    Who will obviously have attractive alternative options…
    Who ACTUALLY have a positive contribution to make…
    Who is not looking for self aggrandizement…

    …be interested in presenting themselves to be abused by hapless brass bowls who are BROKE, IN DEBTED To THE WORLD, and at the mercy of foreign owners of their assets

    Obviously some shiite is SERIOUSLY wrong with our political system – that DISCOURAGES high quality candidates, and encourages riff-raff – whose only objective is to join the gravy train of BB exploiters….

    What a place…
    Steupsss…
    Let us vote for Cuhdear, so that she can get rid of all the damn cars and make us all use ZRs.
    As it is now, a simple simon cannot do much worse that the lotta hands that can’t make one shiite work…

  20. Cuhdear Bajan Avatar

    I like politics, but I have never been interested in party membership, not political office.

    Getting rid of some of the cars and increasing the number of electric buses would both reduce pollution and improve the health of the nation. When I was a child maybe one child in a school of 500 had asthma, the number is much higher now. What if we could BOTH improve our children’s health and improve the quality of public transportation?

    I would replace many of the ZR’ with electric buses.


  21. Cuhdear Bajan

    Same difference


  22. The DLP has to depend on a significant national swing vote % as all winners of the past received. What is obvious is that Barbadians are prepared at this time to hold their noses and vote BLP or stay away from the polls.


  23. “The DLP has to depend on a significant national swing vote % as all winners of the past received. What is obvious is that Barbadians are prepared at this time to hold their noses and vote BLP or stay away from the polls.”

    Instead of blaming people / public
    blame the politicians
    DLP lost credibility
    which is irreversible

    BLP are the peoples choice

    FYI
    Cracking peoples heads and curfews as suggested ‘solutions’ for crime fighting are not vote winners

    Prophecy
    Fabian / Sir Coxsone Sound
    Garvey prophesied
    If there is a stand to be taken
    Let not my people be forsaken
    If there is a man to be blamed
    Let the politician be named

    People, heed the call
    Our backs are now against the wall
    There is no redemption in sight
    Until we people have our rights
    Curfew people burn through the night
    Babylon won’t sleep tonight

    People, heed the call
    Our backs are now against the wall


  24. @ John2
    “Same difference”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    EXACTLY
    However, it tickles Cuhdear’s simple-minded fancies, so she would borrow from the Devil himself – to bring in nuff Chinese electric busses….
    …only to find out in a few years that it is the SAME DIFFERENCE (actually much worse – but that is a complex set of issues)

    This has been the IDENTICAL thinking of our leaders of recent vintage.

    -Arthur wasted vital resources on the lotta CARICOM shiite
    -Freundel got taken with CAHILL on an ill-conceived whim and put a fellow who did not understand fractions to be MoF…
    -Thompson choked on CLICO – and wanted too much to be boss
    …and now we are on steroids in chasing ill-conceived nonsense like:
    — climate change and the attendant money-focused idiocy involved
    — mill and pave nonsense – rather than building lasting QUALITY infrastructure
    — FOOLISH housing schemes like HOPE, STEAL, and a MIRIAD of private sector indiscretions that are DESTROYING the paradise we inherited.

    Steupsss…
    Name any country that became successful WITHOUT an outstandingly impressive and WISE leader – who often took up that role reluctantly, or when all of the usual idiotic suspects had given up in failure.

    The only persons who would fight TOOTH AND NAIL for leadership are those who are looking for (what David Ellis calls) the ’spoils of victory’.
    Would Bushie get into a big fight with you – so that the Bushman can HELP you to enjoy a better life…??? wuh he foolish???
    HOWEVER, if he wanted to tek way the little that you have (via taxes and levies)… BIG fight!!

    Even in the Bible, Israel became great only when a clearly talented shiite shepherd took up the reigns, and it peaked when his WISE son took the country to spectacular heights.
    LOL – of course they were BOTH ultimately destroyed by the greatest weapon in Satan’s arsenal…
    …which is why Bushie DOES not argue with such weapons of mass destruction… LOL
    ha ha ha


  25. “The DLP has to depend on a significant national swing vote % as all winners of the past received. What is obvious is that Barbadians are prepared at this time to hold their noses and vote BLP or stay away from the polls.”

    @ David BU

    How are you?

    Returned to the island a few days ago…… and in time for the St. James North by-election.

    Decided to visit the forum and read the ‘BU intelligentsia’s’ thoughts about the elections and its results.

    However, I agree with your above comments. The registered electors were 8,538 and voter turn-out of 37.85%. Blackman received 3,154 votes (84.27%), with a swing of +3.54, while Dujon received 468 (14.68%), -4.82.

    Some people will argue SJN is a ‘BLP stronghold,’ which may be proven true, especially when a positive swing of +3.54 to the BLP is taken into consideration.
    Unfortunately, however, it seems as though Ralph Thorne has so far been unable to motivate DLP supporters, evidenced by the negative swing of -4.82 against the DLP.

    Ironically, Verla DePeiza began her presidency with a by-election loss in St. George North and a subsequent 30-0 drubbing during the January 19, 2022 general elections.
    There was a 48% voter turn-out in that constituency, and BLP’s Toni Moore received 3,154 votes, while the DLP’s Floyd Reifer, 1,327.

    Alex Mitchell, who ran as a member of the BFP, received only 10 votes. He must have a record for the candidate losing the most deposits.


  26. Good to see you Artax. All the best.

  27. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    “The blogmaster is of the view voters preferred to go with the status quo rather than risk the uncertainty of the ‘unknown’.”
    It seems there was zero risk in voting anything but B? They had a 28-1 majority on election morning. 28-1, 28-2, 29-1, same thing?
    Stronghold or not, a ringing endorsement of the BLP.
    It is riskless by-elections like this, where voters are free to vote whatever, without much consequence.
    Other than the PM having to anoint a new Senator to fill the split Eddykashun ministry opening.
    My view based on the votes cast, Barbados has waaaay too many seats. The cost of paying persons, what has become a Ministerial salary minimum for most, and the associated costs, is beyond a $5B economy.


  28. @NO @Artax

    The challenge should the people chose to accept it is how to hold these bloodsuckers on the public purse accountable. It seems the criminal element is showing their preferred way.


  29. Lorenzo
    David Bu,and they the dems will be rejected again in the general elections pending if they do not rid themselves of the current leader.His in my view arrogance will spell certain defeat for them and himself..Imagine,sidelining Mr Michael Lashley one of their biggest hopes of winning g seat and selecting Ms Dujon,Ms Armstrong,Mr Yearwood and a few others.In my view makes no sense.This is my opinion.


  30. “Three strikes and you are out”

    Parties often die, usually small parties, but some big ones too.

    DLP are deemed not fit to lead and not fit to be opposition.

    To avoid extinction they should concentrate on the latter to be an effective opposition and win circa 5 – 10* seats in the next GE.

    This could be a good opportunity for new parties with visions for positive change.

    (*) as a side note: AI translates 5 – 10 as 5 minus 10.

    Rasta Break Free, Master Of I-Self, Karmic Cycle, Fullness Dub


  31. @Lorenzo

    The discussion for some here has moved past who will win. It is about quality of governance, how do we improve civil engagement and responsibility, is the current electoral and parliamentary system fit for purpose etc.


  32. Lorenzo
    David Bu who will win is of great importance.Do not try to trivialize it.Bajans cannot forget where we were in 2018 at junk bond status with 20 plus downgrades.We cannot afford that level of incompetence ever again.Enough said.


  33. @Lorenzo

    We equally cannot afford to have the level of stasis prevailing. There is the saying that in the land of the blind the one eye man is king.


  34. Is it too late to enshrine a one-party state into the constitution?
    Thorne the magician: He made Dems disappear😊


  35. The decline of the DLP started before Thorne. The next will be a gap general election.


  36. Barbados has been a One Party State since the BLP 30 to 0 win.


  37. What is evident is that quality citizens prefer to avoid offering themselves up for politics, certainly in Barbados. Why do quality citizens avoid public service these days? Do these citizens deserve to be labeled ‘quality’ if they take a back seat, especially in light of the decadence seen all around us?


  38. @ BUSHIE

    I think you may have misunderstood my “ same difference “ comment


  39. After Thompson the Ds went into and to this day continue to decline

  40. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Bloodsuckers is harsh.
    Politics is a chosen Career.
    This is no longer about persons who have been successful in their field, seeking to be of service. Or advancing a particular ideology. This is about personal advancement. Several occupy dual roles, like the MP who continues to be on the BWU payroll. The benefits, not only current, but future (pensions and director fees, and public appointments) significant.
    Moons ago, Directors of companies were poorly remunerated. Today, such positions can earn $100k BDD annually. Plus benefits.
    The fallacy is believing the politically elected are to serve you, because you elected them. They will do as they deem fit. If you don’t like it, vote them out. That is the accountability offered.


  41. @NO

    Eventually the nonaligned expectations i.e. by the public with public servants (politicians) will lead to disharmony and social unrest. It is a zero sum affair.


  42. Which only proves what I posted yesterday. The swibbly balls and stick possessed by men are a liability, not an asset in decision-making. Their absence in women therefore, should not be seen as a reason for lack of leadership capacity.

    Those of us who have read and studied the Bible know that in David’s case, the weapons of mass destruction were, as I opined only yesterday, between his legs. Nowhere is it written that Bathsheba entered David’s abode and threw herself on him. KING David made the bad decision with his little head, had her brought to him, and had HIS WAY with her. Moreover, nowhere is it written that Bathsheba had any input into David’s even worse decision to send her husband to the frontlines of battle and arrange for his death, to make way for his hostile takeover and to cover his sin.

    Does a man bear no responsibility for the workings of his little head? Should not a good leader, by definition, be capable of thinking with his big head?

    As I said only yesterday, many a man has risen to great heights, only to be taken down by his little head. His heads, his faults, HIS FAULT!

    So now, Solomon of the many wives – some of these unions were said to have been made in order to forge alliances and bring the peace, stability and prosperity to the kingdom and the region for which he is known. They were made with his big head and not his little head. The fact that the religions of these many, many wives would come with them should have been known and considered. The effects should have been foreseen. Not so wise after all! Nothing to do with the women that King Solomon’s wisdom had its limits. We should blame that on God, whom Solomon is said to have asked for the wisdom to lead. Apparently, God was running low on stock and gave him what he had. So again we see poor decision-making and poor leadership!

    Of course, these are just historically challenged stories written by men, and Biblical scholars have various opinions on what can be extracted from the accounts and what were the agendas of the writers and editors. Because ALL of the writers and editors of the Bible had agendas, hence the different versions of the gospels, for example.

    What I found puzzling as a thinking teenager was, that an all-seeing God should have said to the wonderfully made Adam, “It is not good for man to be alone.” And then fashion the seemingly inherent “weapon of mass destruction” creature for his helpmeet.

    Eventually, I came to the logical conclusion that these are stories written by men with an agenda, some of it in an effort to understand and explain the meaning of life, and the rest to excuse why they were so awful at living it.

    And so it continues to this day that egotistical man can never take responsibility for his failures, as a wise man and leader should if he wishes to correct his mistakes and be better. But instead of looking inward for the cause of his failures, he looks for the nearest scapegoat.

    Like Donald Trump it is, “I am in charge, but the buck stops down there!”

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    Pathetic and weak!

    P.S. The only thing this woman destroys is your stupid non-arguments. And that is why you no longer argue with her but will entertain Simple Simon. (No offence, Simple Simon, but you never go deep or long.)


  43. Well said, blogmaster! The discussion for almost all of us has long gone past who will win an election. The DLP was soundly rejected and have only looked more ridiculous since then. We can see who will win for the foreseeable future.

    Unfortunately, a win for them does not necessarily translate into a win for Barbados. And that is our concern.

    How do we make it so?

    .


  44. Hardwood houses again.


  45. @555dubstreet

    “DLP’s most feasible opportunity would be if multiple crises hit the nation
    and they offered themselves to be the Disaster Recovery option”
    – – – –
    The wishes of probable disaster for your political party’s success. You’re dispirited. Patriotism isn’t part of your romance.


  46. Tone
    That is the role of shadow Governments to act as back up replacements when the Government machine breaks down. On the Bu we hear the same repeated complaints from the usual suspects for years like a nagging woman bending your ear.


  47. The blogmaster is not surprised. Being a politicians is all she knows and add being a ‘revered’ PM.

    Mia back for third term

    Prime Minister Mia Amor Mottley last night announced she will lead the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) into the next General Election, reversing her previously stated intention to step away after two terms in office.

    Speaking with the Sunday Sun moments before taking the stage at St Alban’s Corner, at a rally to celebrate the victory of Chad Blackman in the St James North by-election last Wednesday, as well as the seventh anniversary of the 2018 vctory at the polls, Mottley cited the immense and ongoing global and local challenges as the driving force behind her decision.

    She pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic, its lingering aftermath, global conflicts and economic instability as key disruptions that significantly affected the administration’s progress since her second term began in January 2022.

    “I’m announcing this because I will stay going into the next campaign,” Mottley stated.

    “When I said I was leaving, I really intended to, but the truth is COVID took away, since January 2022, a further 18 to 19 months. That left us with only about 20 months without COVID since then. When you add to that the storms and the war overseas disrupting global supply chains and economies, you realise we’ve had continuous challenges,” she said.

    ‘Choppy waters’ Describing the current geopolitical environment as “choppy waters”, the Prime Minister said stable leadership was needed to navigate the uncertainties ahead and to meet the mounting pressures from climate change, artificial intelligence, and regional instability.

    “In choppy waters, you need stability,” Mottley said.

    “The country needs, more than ever, stability and continued growth. We must become more competitive. We must become more innovative because nobody owes us anything and the world is too challenging.”

    Mottley said her decision was not taken lightly, adding she was also influenced by numerous appeals from the public over the past year, including a wave of encouragement during the St James North byelection campaign.

    “I have had many calls from people for the last year,” she revealed. “People have written to me. Over the course of the last three weeks, especially during the byelection, it became more intense. After sleeping on it, I determined that I have a duty to stay, to lead the party into the next campaign and continue the work of transformation we’ve started.”

    No comfirmation

    She declined to say whether this would be her final term if successful at the polls, only that she was“dealing with the immediacy” of the current national and global situation.

    The Prime Minister outlined a slate of priorities that would form the backbone of her continued leadership, including the transformation of the education system, tackling crime, improving traffic management, expanding access to health care, and enhancing national competitiveness through innovation.

    “I will stay with you,” Mottley affirmed. “I will lead the Barbados Labour Party into the next term because we have work still to do”.

    Mottley said Barbados needed dependable leadership to sustain momentum in national development.

    At the end of her speech she was joined by a number of MPs and ministers on stage singing and swaying to John Legends’ Stay With You.

    Mottley, 59, led the BLP to historic landslide victories in 2018 and 2022, securing all 30 seats in Parliament on both occasions.

    (CLM)

    Source: Nation


  48. @Bush Tea

    Peter Wickham, talking head, probably wrote this piece for your benefit.

    Understanding voter apathy

    This article was written and submitted by Peter W Wickham, a political consultant and a director of Caribbean Development Research Services (CADRES). In the wake of the St James North byelection on May 21, there has been a national reflection on the issue of voter apathy which is a healthy discussion in a young democracy.

    Although well intentioned, several reflections demonstrate a lack of understanding regarding the concept and worse, a politically skewed expression of this phenomenon.

    There is a need to unpack the outcome of this by-election and if we choose to locate our analysis in the context of voter apathy, we need first to understand the concept before we can consider how it impacted.

    Apathy of any variety relates to a lack of enthusiasm or interest in an activity; hence voter apathy implies a lack of interest in voting and we can agree that this is, to some extent, an emerging global phenomenon. This discussion here, however, appears based on two misleading and dangerous assumptions, the first of which is the assumption that a lack of interest in voting is inherently bad.

    Secondly, there is a misleading assumption that the Mia Amor Mottley administration is to some extent responsible for this apathy which stains the Barbados Labour Party’s (BLP) impressive victory in St James North.

    The suggestion that “the BLP might still need to examine why, in spite of its obvious incumbent advantages and popularity of its leader, voter apathy remains strong” reflects a tragic misunderstanding of the concept and infers that apathy is a BLP problem.

    If we were to unpack the concept of apathy using an academic lens it would become immediately apparent that too little serious investigation has been conducted on this issue and perhaps some investigative research should be commissioned.

    To my understanding, people are often not interested in voting for several reasons, some of which are reasonable. At the same time, however, the majority opinion is coloured by a generational appreciation of hard-fought battles to vote and civic responsibility. Those among us who witnessed the battle of the South African majority to vote in free and fair elections and take an interest in the evolution of the US Voting Rights Act of 1965, see the act of voting as sacrosanct and struggle with the idea that thousands who can vote, chose not to. I do share this struggle. However I also appreciate the extent to which there are other relevant views which carry equal weight and should be respected.

    Albeit limited, research conducted by CADRES demonstrates that the vast majority of us do vote and the minority that does not vote is motivated by reasons that range from religious justifications to a genuine disinterest in the political process, born of either satisfaction or displeasure. In the case of St James North, our research suggests that of the 8 538 people on the EBC list in that constituency, 2 068 were unavailable to vote for reasons ranging from death to migration, either out of Barbados or the constituency. This information can be easily obtained based on the postal circular returns which both parties would have access to (if they are diligent enough to do the calculations).

    This is not an insignificant number, which means that at the outset about 25 per cent or one quarter of the people who are listed to vote, cannot and this has nothing to do with apathy.

    In terms of the remaining 6 470 people, 3 231 or roughly half did vote and the remainder presented assorted reasons for not doing so. CADRES efforts to interrogate these reasons in the run-up to the election presented evidence suggesting a lack of motivation was the primary justification and the demographic group more exposed was young men.

    This is consistent with our historic understanding of voter nonparticipation, especially in a by-election as reflected in the appended table. Historically, there have only been three comparable by-elections which could be described as optional (the living Member of Parliament resigned) and in two of these, significantly less people voted than was the case with the most proximate General Election. Conversely, the 2002 St Thomas by-election was one in which the Democratic Labour Party’s (DLP) historic performance resulted in record numbers for them which clearly balanced the turnout scales.

    If we were to explore further the rationale behind motivation, it becomes clear that people are less motivated when they believe their participation is either not needed or won’t make a difference. In this regard, I have frequently quoted the British Election Study (BES) seminal research into the historic low turnout in the UK (2001).

    This study noted a decline in participation in UK elections that is similar to that being discussed. It suggested that the single largest factor contributing to the 2001 low turnout was an expectation that Tony Blair would win a second term, combined with a profound lack of opposition to his re-election. Simply put, the British wanted Blair to win, expected he would win and therefore were not motivated to participate as their vote wasn’t needed for the desired outcome. In the case of St James North, CADRES’ research supported a similar perception that was buttressed by the unanimity of analysts regarding the likely outcome.

    There are, of course, ranges of motivation and the moderately motivated would perhaps have been willing to participate in the election if it were easier, hence the call in some quarters for alternative options to vote. Here also, young people appear more inclined to desire an online voting facility as this is a norm to which they have become accustomed. While I would not recommend such a facility as it comes with significant challenges, we might, however, want to consider the mail-in option as it becomes clearer that millennials are not particularly keen on standing in line in the way that our foreparents have become accustomed to.

    Another data set which highlights an inaccuracy that apathy reflects poorly on the Government is presented in the second table. In this instance, the actual number of votes received by each party is tabulated and averages generated, along with an average of the increases/decreases.

    This reveals that the BLP has brought out more voters consistently since 1981, while the DLP has brought out less. The BLP has consistently delivered a vote count within proximity of the average and fell significantly below this only in 1986 and 2008 which were DLP swing years.

    Conversely, the DLP has fallen significantly short of its cohort in 2018, 2022 and 2025 with this most recent performance being a historic low and less than half of the DLP’s average.

    In the face of this evidence, it becomes clear that the DLP has contributed more to voter apathy here and this challenges the basis of this assumption that apathy reflects more poorly in the Government.

    Source: Nation


  49. @ David
    Kindly refrain from associating Bushie with Petra…. thanks!!
    Jealousy is a serious thing..
    LOL…
    Those Frenchmen are known to have exercised extreme agression against black brass bowls in the past, …and Bushie would not want to be the one to teach him which God the bushman is serving…

    ALL politicians and the lotta shiite ‘political analysts’ who revere them, are responsible for voter apathy. Enuff is Enuff!!

    Only a ‘Lorenzo’ type, a political lackie analyst, or a mendicant parro-type – looking for a $300 handout and a promise of a Hardwood house….would be minded to waste the time and effort taken, to vote between twiddle Bum and twiddle Dee…

    WAIT!!
    Is Mascoll helping Sutherland with this new Hardwood housing scam?

    Mascoll has some experience in this area – ent it? …and is now government’s top economic advisor – so whatever the Hell he did back then must have resonated with the Empress…

    No wonder Enuff was silent – when Bushie asked what the next scam would look like – after the SJN ‘endorsement’ – where 70% of voters said to ‘piss off’…

    NO ONE could make this brown stuff up….
    What a place!!

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading