← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Ministerial Statement On Revitalisation Of National Insurance Scheme
BY GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS | JUL 28, 2023 |

Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector, Colin Jordan. (FP)

Ministerial Statement on the revitalisation of the National Insurance Scheme by Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector, Colin Jordan, in the House of Assembly on Friday, July 28, 2023.

Mr. Speaker, the 17th Actuarial Review of the National Insurance Fund, the Unemployment Fund and Severance Fund as of December 31, 2020 was laid in this Honourable House on August 9, 2022. I should remind Members that the National Insurance Scheme manages these three funds along with the Catastrophe Fund and the Sugar Workers’ Provident Fund.

During the three years under review, the number of contributors decreased each year while the number of pensioners and the total pension payouts increased each year.

The Review’s assessment suggests that current contribution and benefit provisions generally provide a very good level of benefit adequacy and income protection to most workers and pensioners.  The legislated annual adjustments of the earnings limit and pensions have been effective in replacing most of the price inflation felt by pensioners and maintaining adequate coverage for higher paid workers. In other words, pensioners have generally been able to use the cost of living allowance increases to adjust to temporary price rises.

For the Review, four sets of 60-year projections of Barbados’ population and National Insurance Fund finances were performed so that a range of reasonable prospects for the Fund could be assessed.  These projections were based on there being no changes to the current contribution rate and legislated benefit rules.

Except for under the most optimistic scenario, projections indicated that between 2022 to 2025, total expenditure will exceed total income each year.  As a result, the Fund will need to rely more heavily on investment income to help meet expenditure each year. Of critical importance, eventually investments will have to be liquidated to meet the deficit and, as a result, depletion of the Fund was projected for between the years 2034 and 2041.

Mr. Speaker, it is important to note that a number of factors have contributed to where we are today.

There are the demographic factors: Our population is aging and has begun to decline. Allow me to share some statistics:
In 2015 there were 2,874 live births, 2,538 deaths, and 3,481 taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination;
In 2020 there were 2,349 live births, 2.713 deaths, and 3,381 taking the Barbados
Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination;
In 2021 there were 2,207 live births, 2,895 deaths, and 3,336 taking the Barbados
Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination; and
In 2022 there were 2,274 live births, 3,349 deaths, and 3,091 taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination.
Our total deaths per year now exceed total births. In ten years the number of children taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination will be 33% less that the current amount. These statistics make very clear the serious challenge we face. There will be fewer and fewer workers to contribute and support persons who are living longer and longer. We used to say that our population was over 280,000 and that we were heading to 300,000. The numbers now say that our population has started to decline.

Another contributing factor is the reality that when the NIS was originally designed in 1967 the average life expectancy was 68 years. In 2004 when the last adjustments were made to the NIS, life expectancy was 75 years. Today it is 78 years and expected to continue increasing.

These two trends mean that we are simultaneously suffering a reduction in the contributor base – the number of people who are paying National Insurance  – whilst paying out more in benefits to the increasing number of pensioners.

There are factors around employment status: The informal sector is growing. A higher percentage of persons are not tied to an employer and many do not participate in the social security system. Statistics suggest that less than 15% of self-employed persons contribute to NIS.

Governance factors: The structure of the NIS splits responsibilities between the Public Service and the National Insurance Board. This, as you can imagine, causes challenges in management, allocation of resources, and accountability.

This Government acted as a responsible Government should and, like it has since being elected to office in 2018, we took the people into our confidence and starting in July 2022, undertook an extensive series of consultations.

The National Insurance Fund is strong with assets of approximately $4bn with average yields on investments of 4.3%. Even though the Fund is not in crisis now, we know that we have a date with destiny between 2034 and 2041. We refused to kick the can down the road and instead took the decision to ensure that the people of Barbados will have a social security system that is sustainable and will be able to provide benefits for all, particularly the most vulnerable.

This administration has made it clear that for every major decision we will consult with the public. In order to make the eventual reforms to revitalize the NIS a reality, we met and consulted with a wide range of stakeholders including: the Social Partnership; leaders of faith-based organisations; the Democratic Labour Party; the Alliance Party for Progress; independent Senators; the Executive Committee of the National Union of Public Workers; the Executive Council of the Barbados Workers’ Union; Unity Workers Union; Barbados Association of Retired Persons; the staff of the National Insurance Department; former Ministers, chairpersons and members of the National Insurance Board; members of the private sector; and managers of media houses.

Three well-attended town hall meetings were held at Combermere School, Alexandra School and Princess Margaret Secondary School. Another town hall meeting was organized by the Democratic Labour Party at its headquarters. Additionally, suggestion boxes were placed at locations across the island, and the option to make submissions via email was facilitated. Two public surveys were also conducted which together received over 2,500 responses.

The stakeholder and town hall meetings, and the other avenues provided, allowed for scores of suggestions on how the National Insurance Scheme could and should be revitalized and placed on a sustainable footing. There was consensus that we all had a responsibility to ensure those who contributed were able to benefit when the time came for them to receive benefits.

Suggestions and proposals received addressed retirement age, contribution rates, the basis of pension calculations, participation by the self-employed, population trends in the country, investment policies, enforcing compliance, timely action to address any challenges, the need for audited financial statements, the composition and governance of the National Insurance Board, and the ability of the organisation to be nimble and responsive, among others.

A core group was established comprising Rawdon Adams, Wismar Greaves, Sir Roy Trotman, Marsha Caddle, M.P., Prof. Justin Robinson, Senator Crystal Drakes, and Actuary Derek Osbourne. This group reviewed all of the submissions and survey results and crafted a suite of suggestions based on achieving the best possible balance between benefit adequacy, contribution affordability and fund sustainability for revitalizing the NIS.

The suggestions were shared with a Working Group that included persons from the private sector, a regional development finance institution, and senior management of the National Insurance Department, and further with a larger Advisory Group of stakeholders from trade unions, academia, civil society and the public service for further discussion and comment.

The National Insurance Board was then tasked with proposing a final suite of measures for submission to The Cabinet.

Mr. Speaker, the National Insurance Board has made its submission to The Cabinet and the Cabinet has agreed proposals that I will share today with this Honourable Chamber in the Annex to this Statement, and which will be a Document of the House and therefore a public document.

These measures are designed to ensure the stability of the scheme and to make good on the assertion that “National Insurance is more than a contribution; it’s our lifeline.” The recommendations will first stabilize the National Insurance Fund and then maintain the size of its projected reserves at a level equal to or greater than two to three times the value of annual benefit expenditures.

Allow me now, Mr. Speaker, to share some of the main proposals that Cabinet has agreed.

There will be no increase in the contribution rates for employers or employees. The percentages deducted and paid to the NIS will remain as they are now.
Mr. Speaker, I mentioned earlier that when the NIS was created in 1967, life expectancy was 68 and the pensionable age then was 60, based on the idea that 8 years is an appropriate differential between life expectancy and retirement age. As of 2020, life expectancy had improved to 78 and is expected to continue improving. The pensionable age is now 67, making the current difference between average years lived and retirement age 11 years. The measure therefore recommended here is a one-year rise of the pensionable age in two steps:-In 2028 the pensionable age will become sixty-seven and a half (67.5) years
In 2034 the pensionable age becomes sixty-eight (68) years
Mr. Speaker, the public was clear that, while changes would have to be made, there was no desire to have 70 years as the pensionable age, and we have done our utmost to honour that desire.

3. Today, the first age to qualify for a reduced pension  is 60 years. There will be a change to this age in three steps:-

61 in 2025
62 in 2028
63 in 2031
4. There will be an increase in the number of contributions required to become eligible for pension from five hundred (500) weeks (approximately 10 years) to seven hundred and fifty (750) weeks (approximately 15 years) with no effect on those sixty (60) years or older on January 1, 2024.  For comparison, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago and St. Lucia also saw it necessary to fix their number of contributions required at 750, and others in the region who are currently at 500 are moving in a similar direction. For persons less than sixty (60) years old on January 1, 2024, the number of contributions required increases by thirty (30) weeks per year until 2030 and becomes seven hundred and fifty (750) weeks in 2031.

It is understood that, with most persons starting to work by their early to midtwenties, the requirement for contributing to the National Insurance Scheme for at least fifteen (15) years is entirely reasonable and brings us into line with international benchmarks.

In this transition, however, we are making sure that persons who are already sixty years old, or will be sixty years or older by January 1, 2024 will not be affected.

5. The National Insurance and Social Security Act will be amended to indicate that the National Insurance Board will develop a Funding Policy, and any adjustment being proposed to the policy by the Board must be laid in Parliament.  The Minister responsible for Social Security must respond to the Board’s proposal within six (6) weeks of the document being laid in Parliament.

Mr. Speaker, the fact that we are where we are today reforming and revitalising the NIS so significantly is due in large measure to past inaction. As far back as 2014 was when benefit expenditure first outstripped contribution income. Yet no corrective action was taken, despite the flashing warning. To stop this damaging delay happening ever again a Funding Policy and a Compulsory Adjustment Mechanism will be incorporated into the National Insurance and Social Security Act. These amendments will ensure timely intervention to keep the Fund on track to meet its revitalisation goals.

6. There will be a change where the wages used to calculate the pension benefit will be the “Best 10 years” rather than the ‘Best 5 years”.

Many persons were opposed to what is considered an abuse of the system, where some persons contribute at the maximum for five years then stop, and are still able to enjoy the maximum pension. Going forward the basis for calculating pension will be the best ten years.

There will be an aggressive approach to encouraging and enforcing compliance with the legislation governing the National Insurance Scheme. Officers from the Compliance Unit will be in the field, and the Office will use all measures at its disposal to ensure the law is adhered to, including using garnishments or the Law Courts.

A critical aspect of the revitalization of the National Insurance Scheme will be the implementation of a new regime that is more flexible, and simplifies the process for self-employed persons to participate in the NIS by way of making contributions and receiving benefits. We expect that this will result in higher enrolment by selfemployed persons in the National Insurance Scheme.

Before I go on, Mr. Speaker, please allow me to reiterate that the classification of a person as self-employed is not determined by any construction or other company’s management making a unilateral decision that a carpenter or labourer or steel bender is to be treated as self-employed just so that the responsibility and cost of social security is evaded. There are set criteria based on case law that are used by both the Labour Department and the National Insurance Department to make the determination. Good employers know what those criteria are and abide by them.

The new regime for persons registered as self-employed will provide an innovative approach and formula for converting contributions to weeks and wages and a corresponding mechanism to determine short-term benefit eligibility.

I will use an example from an industry that I am familiar with to make the point. A taxi driver will ordinarily generate decent cash flow during the November to April period. They may make some money again in July/August. Currently if the taxi driver does not pay contributions in May and June, or September to November, the system will say that she or he is delinquent and owes contributions – and levies penalties, not taking into account the seasonal nature of the business. The same goes for entertainers who may earn most of their money during Carnival or Crop Over, or artisans who may work on a house for three months and then may be out of work for a month before the next job begins. And in a third-decade-of-the-twenty-firstcentury world, Gig entrepreneurs have a similar challenge.

In the first phase, we expect that:

Self-employed persons will be able to pay their contributions without having to complete schedules or specify a period;
They will be able to make their payments via Bank Bill Pay, credit card, cheque or cash;
Confirmation of receipt of payment will be sent via email;
There will be an online interface which allows the self-employed to view submitted contribution payments; and
There will be the ability to pay at any time during the year.
Thereafter, we expect that:

Self-employed persons will be able to make payments using the NIS portal or using EZPay.
The contribution payments of all self-employed persons will be converted to earnings.
Self-employed persons will be notified of their short-term benefit status for each year.
Short-term and long-term benefits will be computed using the new payment regime; and
Self-employed persons will be able to apply for and receive Clearance Certificates.
Mr. Speaker, allow me to share with the Chamber and with the people of Barbados that a Cabinet Paper on the introduction of paternity leave benefit to allow the granting of paid paternity leave has been prepared and will soon be sent to The Cabinet.

Additionally, the NIS Regulations will be amended to allow persons who have not made the requisite contributions to qualify for a pension to be able to catch up or become current with the understanding that a premium will have to be paid for the privilege.

Mr. Speaker, when we came to office we found out that NIS contributions for public officers had not been paid since 2015. This Government has paid up the $250m that was owing. At the same time we have been staying current with payments. Because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic this Government has recapitalized the Unemployment Benefit Fund to the tune of $143m. Prior to this this administration coming to office in 2018 Government owed the NIS $83.5m for non-contributory pensions. This outstanding debt has been cleared. $66m has also been paid toward the Training Levy.

Some of the matters raised by persons related to the governance of the Scheme. During our consultations, we shared the hybrid nature of the current structure where some functions related to the Ministry of the Public Service and others related to the Board. It is not fully a Government Department and it is not fully a state-owned enterprise. We are in the final stages of transitioning the current structure into a commercial state-owned enterprise.

Mr. Speaker, a country’s social security system is intended to be a safety net for persons in their time of need – whether for maternity, or in cases of illness or employment injury, or, importantly, for old-age pension. The sustainability of the system is critical to the well-being of citizens.

The Government of Barbados will continue to do right by the people of Barbados. We today share measures that were designed through extensive consultation, careful modelling and deliberate assessment, are human-centred, and take into account our realities.

We are confident that they will serve to revitalize the National Insurance Scheme and protect our people for many years to come.

Mr. Speaker, I am obliged to you.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

110 responses to “SOS Ministerial Statement on the NIS”


  1. This fund is dying as a consequence of a number of factors including the demands of neoliberal capitalism over decades.

    This was a deliberate act by Mottley’s curators in Washington. As they are doing with their own social security scheme. Kill it, if it cant be privatized.

    Whether the “borrowings” by several political administrations secured by useless paper or the eugenicists work of Clyde Gollop, all metrics point to eventual collapse.

    And the Mottley regime should face this fact. The reality that regime after regime has been playing games with the people, with the funds.

    They should come out and say what a blind man could see. That this thing is unviable and should stop this constant imposition of useless management on an already lost cause.

  2. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    This is known as “putting lipstick on a pig”.
    When lesser occured in
    France the people rioted for weeks.
    Permit a quote from 17th Actuarial Audit…”at current contribution rates and pension provisions the NIS is unsustainable”
    The contribution rates remain the same, which means they changed provisions. You will be older and need to contribute for longer, before receiving benefit.
    That’s ok, as other neighbouring nations have done the same 😆😆
    Be forewarned. This is Phase 1, others will follow.
    Any self employed person would do well to deduct monies for their retirement but invest it elsewhere.


  3. A quote from the press (Nation).

    Jordan noted that Barbados had an ageing population and pointed to a trend of deaths per year exceeding births and life expectancy increasing.
    “These statistics make very clear the serious challenge we face. There will be fewer and fewer workers to contribute and support persons who are living longer and longer. We used to say that our population was over 280 000 and that we were heading to 300 000. The numbers now say that our population has started to decline.
    “Another contributing factor is the reality that when the NIS was originally designed in 1967, the average life expectancy was 68 years . . . . Today it is 78 years and expected to continue increasing.”
    He added: “These two trends mean that we are simultaneously suffering a reduction in the contributor base – the number of people who are paying National Insurance – whilst paying out more in benefits to the increasing number of pensioners.”


  4. Franklyn decries pension age hike

    Government’s latest tinkering with the retirement age is putting more stress on the most vulnerable, charges former senator and head of the Unity Workers Union, Caswell Franklyn.
    He said there were people hanging on waiting for their pensions but some would now have a further wait.
    “This Government is . . . hurting the poorest of the poor but this is what they voted for.
    They saw the road the Government was headed down and they gave them 30 seats again,” he said.
    Yesterday, in a Ministerial Statement in the House of Assembly, Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector Colin Jordan announced that over a six-year period, the pension age for Barbadians would move to 68 years, up by one year.
    Debate followed on the National Insurance And Social Security (Amendment) Bill, 2023 which is to change the pensionable age in 2028 to 67.5 years and in 2034 to 68 years.
    Contributions required to become eligible for pensions will move from 500 weeks (ten years) to 750 weeks (15 years), with no effect on those who are 60 years or older on January 1, 2024.
    Franklyn questioned why in all the shifting of the pension age for ordinary Barbadians to 68, the move did not touch the Members of Parliament (MPs) who qualified for their pension at age 50.
    Burden
    “Imagine you are telling me that most people in Barbados only have one source for pension and that is the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) and you cutting back on the NIS, but what about the MPs? I haven’t heard anything about raising the age for the MPs to
    collect their pensions.
    . . . The MPs get their pensions 18 years before everybody else and I ain’t heard anybody crying out about that.
    They qualify for pension at 50.
    “These same people would look at you and tell you, you have to wait until 67 or 68. They must share the burden.
    They can’t every time put the burden on the poorest of poor. I don’t understand why the people in this country tolerate this nonsense!” he declared.
    Franklyn accused the Government of bringing the matter before the House of Assembly at a time when the public was distracted by the weekend and two upcoming bank holidays. “There’s no reason why the House had to meet today (yesterday).
    This is nothing urgent.
    This is to give the people a long weekend to forget about it,” he claimed.
    When contacted, president of the Barbados Association of Retired Persons, Marilyn Rice-Bowen, told the Saturday Sun they would study the ministerial statement and make a comment next week.
    (AC)

    Source: Nation


  5. Govt submits bill to up retirement age

    ST GEORGE’S – The government has successfully tabled legislation amending the National Insurance Act allowing for an increase in the retirement age, as well as a redefined meaning of the word, child.
    In addition, the amendment also allows for the increased penalties for violation of the measures contained in the Grenada legislation that was first passed in 1983.
    According to the amendment, as of January 2024, the age of retirement will increase incrementally by one year until 2028, when the retirement age will be 65.
    Leader of Government Business in the Upper House, Adrian Thomas said the amendments are intended “to preempt and bolster pending amendments to the national insurance benefit regulations and national employment injury benefits regulations to improve the benefits available to children of insured persons.”
    One of the significant changes is that of the definition of the word “child” in the act.
    The act, prior to the proposed amendment said “child”, in relation to an insured person, includes “a step-child, an adopted child and any other child whether born in or out of wedlock under the age of sixteen living at the home of an insured person and wholly or partly maintained by him or her.”
    Rescue mission
    The approved amendments to the definition will allow for the age of the child to be increased to 18 years and that child, whether or not maintained by the insured prior to the insured’s death, will be eligible for benefits under the scheme.
    “Our intention is to put this bill into effect from the first of August 2023 and also the related regulations will come into effect on that particular date,” Thomas said.
    Social Development and Gender Affairs Minister, Gloria Thomas said the bill was “timely and relevant” adding that “if we are to save the NIS, the decision to extend the retirement age is one where crucial measures must be taken to assist in this rescue mission.
    “Great leaders take hard decisions in the interest of people and this decision to move the retirement age to 61 in January 2024 is indeed a hard one.
    “The record shows that since 2002 recommendations were made to start increasing the pensionable age to keep the scheme viable, but the recommendations were ignored . . . 21 years later, it took this administration to come forward to amend the legislation to make this possible,” the Social Development Minister said.
    (CMC)


  6. When all is said and done the tired economic model is starting to do the job again.

    LOOKING UP

    Economy records growth for ninth straight quarter Barbados’ economy has grown for the ninth consecutive quarter, expanding by 3.9 per cent in the first six months of the year.
    However, Central Bank Governor Dr Kevin Greenidge stressed that in order for the country’s economic fortunes to continue improving, there is need for a major injection of investment, especially from the private sector.
    He also said the economy is expected to grow by between four and five per cent overall this year, with a boost expected in the coming months from the return of a full Crop Over Festival itinerary and the anticipated opening of the Wyndham Sam Lord’s Hotel.
    The Governor was speaking at the Courtney Blackman Grande Salle yesterday while delivering the bank’s latest economic review.
    “Higher output of goods and services in the first six months of 2023 permeated the economy, bolstering other related economic fundamentals. Economic activity expanded by 3.9 per cent, representing the ninth consecutive quarter of economic expansion.
    “This growth resulted in fiscal surpluses, improved employment, reduced debt-to-GDP (gross domestic product) ratio, narrowing gap between the value of exports and imports and record foreign reserve levels. The increased economic activity also fed into the financial services sector, improving credit quality, as well as boosting assets and profits,” Greenidge reported.
    Strong tourist season
    He said a strong winter tourist season and broad-based increases in the non-traded economic sectors fuelled the economic growth between January and June.
    “The spillovers from tourism and robust construction activity enabled the non-traded sectors to contribute two-thirds of overall real GDP growth,” he said.
    Explaining the strong tourism performance, the
    economist added: “Long-stay tourist arrivals outpaced 2022’s performance. A number of factors drove tourism growth, including persistent demand for travel especially from the island’s main source markets, improvements in airlift and increased cruise activity. The United Kingdom market has recovered beyond pre-pandemic levels, while the other markets are close to pre-pandemic levels and continue to exhibit strong growth.”
    At $3.1 billion at the end of the review period, Barbados’ gross international reserves “remained high mainly due to the tourism rebound”, Greenidge added.
    He said in the economic outlook that “real GDP is on track to grow by about four to five per cent in 2023 contingent on a continued recovery in tourism activity and increased private sector investments”.
    “With respect to tourism, forward bookings for the remainder of the year are encouraging. The return of a full Crop Over Festival itinerary and the anticipated opening of the Wyndham Sam Lord’s Hotel are expected to boost demand for the destination in the coming months,” he stated.
    “The other sectors of the economy should continue to benefit from the strong tourism performance and construction activity. A projected expansion in construction in the second half of 2023 is also expected to aid output growth in the non-traded sectors and assist with employment growth.”
    He also flagged the importance of increasing investment to drive economic growth.
    “We are expecting strong growth into the medium term. Now, to achieve that growth, we need to invest, the only way that we are going to get the growth we are targeting under the BERT programme of five per cent,” he said.
    “Why do you need five per cent? In order to get that five per cent growth at that level will mean further economic development . . . meaning that all citizens benefit from it. It’s trickling down to all sectors; you need that sustainability,” Greenidge added. (SC)


    Source: Nation


  7. The flaw in Caswell’s argument about Barbadians voting 30-0 for the BLP is that the state of NIS straddles both BLP and DLP.

  8. Yolande Grant - African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved. Avatar
    Yolande Grant – African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    Steal the people’s money by the billions for decades, run bs talk on them..write off the thefts and destroy all the records……leave them pauperized unable to rise…tell them go wukkup as a distraction and adore all the criminal thieves whike they at it..

    .now telling them there is a population decline and to be as hypocrital as they can, take it upon their stinking selves to “redefine the word child” like someone other than ignorant slaves listen to these thieving, lying criminals..


  9. The flaw in Caswell’s argument about Barbadians voting 30-0 for the BLP is that the state of NIS straddles both BLP and DLP.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The flaw in your critique of Caswell is that he was not talking about any DLP, but about the idiotic decision to remove the ONLY two sensible voices in the house and senate last elections.

    You seem to be overly willing to forgive BLP idiocy by comparing it with known (and punished) DLP stupidity.

    The DLP should do Barbados a favor and dissolve itself….
    All those idiots did was to create a bar SO LOW, that even a snake appears to be on higher moral ground…


  10. @Bush Tea

    Is that what you read into the statement? Forgive a lowly blogmaster.


  11. This Ministerial Statement is a long roll of bull shit.
    Such nonsense could ONLY fly in a cuntry of brass bowls so dumb, that they actually believe that bringing foreigners from completely different cultures and languages to run their ONLY airport, is some kind of ‘master stroke’.
    Such thinking REQUIRES a special kind of idiot.

    No wonder then that Jordan can, with a straight face, slap sanctions on vulnerable Bajan brass bowls ..while blaming them for the failure of a national insurance Fund that

    – has not been audited for decades…

    – has GIVEN away millions of dollars to KNOWN political funders on questionable projects such as Apes Hill, Sandals, Four Seasons…. etc etc

    – has unilaterally written off BILLIONS in debts owed to the NIS fund

    – has maintained the most incompetent and unproductive management possible – with failed information systems, lost cheques, poor customer service and generally piss poor performance.

    – Has had a set of clowns installed as Board members over the years whose main qualifications seem to be the ability to parrot the administrations story line…

    Bushie concludes that ONLY a people who has been specially CURSED spiritually can be subjected to such stark humiliation…

    ….and WHY would there be such a curse?

    Whenever God’s people turn their face AWAY from their creator, and turn their minds to REVELRY …or Kadooment, or partying they have suffered such…


  12. Is that what you read into the statement?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Did you think that the blogmaster was the ONLY ‘gallows bait’ on the blog?


  13. …. Barbados was once, long ago, known as the “Cradle of Truth” because it was from here that Quakers spread the “Truth” to the New World.

    True True fact!!

    https://academic.oup.com/illinois-scholarship-online/book/13756/chapter-abstract/167384937?redirectedFrom=fulltext

    What is “Truth”?

    John 14:6
    King James Version
    6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

    It is sad that in a secular world, academia will not tell you what is “Truth”!!

  14. Yolande Grant - African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved. Avatar
    Yolande Grant – African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    “From our older ladies, permission (or not, the state will decide in our unconstitutional parliament) for the NIS (state) to use of their wombs into which the fertilized eggs may be implanted.”

    Bushman…stop trying to get yaself killed.

  15. Yolande Grant - African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved. Avatar
    Yolande Grant – African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    Bushman…check 789 whatsapp group…the ugly is even UGLIER than we thought…the last few posts ..photo of a dude modeling his new vajayjay.


  16. On second thoughts, neoliberal capitalism could become an integral part of the whole scheme as the state can make money from the production of babies.

    The society which will raise the child could be charged a fee for each child so delivered through some additional NIS contribution.

    This scheme would also apply the transgender craze now sweeping the world as not only women but also men can be employed to make these babies … once technology advances to this stage.


  17. The great contradiction given the decision to push back NIS requirements and the segment of the population it will impact.

    Give older people a chance, says Minister Humphrey

    Article by Barbados Today
    Published on
    July 29, 2023

    https://barbadostoday.bb/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/HUMPHREY1-760×475.png

    Minister of People Empowerment and Elder Affairs Kirk Humphrey says ageism is holding back older people in Barbados from making contributions and earning money, as he made a case for greater opportunities to be provided to seniors.

    “The problem with Barbados in many cases is our mindset. People judge people for all kinds of reasons,” Humphrey said while giving his support to the National Insurance and Social Security (Amendment) Bill, 2023 in the House of Assembly on Friday evening.

    “We bring our limitations to people’s existence. So, you see a person now who is 60 and you say, ‘I want a job for so and so’ and they tell you that [person] is 60, they can’t do the work. But I have just said to you that the vast majority of Barbadians, at the rate that we are going, will soon be 60. Barbados is an aged society, so it means we have to find things for older people to be able to do and stop blocking them from having access to the resources that we make available to everybody else.”

    Minister Humphrey used Japan as an example as he spoke about that nation’s efforts to take advantage of its “silver economy” – an economy which includes all those economic activities, products and services designed to meet the needs of people over the age of 50.

    “As our society ages, we have to find ways to involve older people doing different things. It is not enough for us to accept that our society is ageing, and our systems have not advanced in a way that is commensurate with the rate at which our society is ageing . . . . In Japan, they have found a way to make the silver economy really mean something,” he said.

    “They tell me that in Japan, they have hundreds of universities for older people . . . so people could learn new things. The Barbados Association of Retired Persons (BARP) is doing everything in their power to help retool older people. We have to open new spaces for them [and] as our population ages, I know these are conversations that we are going to have to have.”
    Courtesy Garage_Nissan Leaf 2023_300x300 July 7- 20

    Humphrey said re-tooling the elderly would be beneficial not only because it keeps them active but it can assist them to earn a supplementary income.

    He noted that some 500 people over the age of 65 currently depend on grants from the Welfare Department and he expressed concern that as Barbados’ population continues to age, those numbers will increase, putting greater pressure on the system.

    “If we get to a point where people are over 65, 67, or 68, where do you think they are going to end up? At some point, either we manage this social problem by applying smart, commonsense deeply rooted in economics and planning actuarial sciences solutions or we find ourselves dealing with a mass of people going before the Welfare Department at 67, 68 years old asking for financial support,” Humphrey advised. (KC)

    Source: BT


  18. Then where was that god-forsaken god when the minds of his socalled people were being imposed with systems of thinking foreign to them. Implicit is the thinking that such ways of being known before were of no consequence. Are we not seeing that imposed thinking reaching its nadir? And that socalled god as well?

  19. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Population is a smoke screen. At 267k, 283k or 275k, that’s a 5% max differential. Yes it is relevant. And easily addressed. The contribution years are increasing 50%, not 5%. Along with other cost saving changes, age increases etc it’s a whammy (but expected)
    As a side issue, between myself and siblings, we have 19 years of NIS contributions with zero benefit. One dead, and the other 3 have lived elsewhere for 40+ years.

    A CRIME DESERVES TIME

    “Mr. Speaker, when we came to office we found out that NIS contributions for public officers had not been paid since 2015. This Government has paid up the $250m that was owing. At the same time we have been staying current with payments”

    Somebody(?) decided to take the cash from public employees NIS deductions, and instead of remitting it to the NIS, sent it elsewhere, to fund the GoB operations. No public officer, nor elected person has the authority to do this, without changes to legislation. It was a CRIME, it DESERVES TIME.

    Translation. “paid up” means the GoB sent the NIS $250M worth of Bonds. “staying current” means to date, all the requirements of those Bonds have been met.

    “Suggestions and proposals received addressed….. “investment policies, enforcing compliance, timely action to address any challenges, the need for audited financial statements”,

    So wait you addressed all the others without touching these?

    Changes is structure (TBA) is another smoke screen. What it really does is bury the past, without ever making it public as required by law.
    If you continually break the laws, it doesn’t matter what structure you have.

    OK, I appreciate how the self-employed, especially in the modern context of sub-contracting vs employing, is a challenge. A big one given the amount of content dedicated to it.
    BUT, to go on about laws, when the NIS itself has been allowed to break the laws for years is RICH. Do as I say not as I do?

    Something had to be done. And it has. Yet, little or nothing has addressed the multiple abuses and illegal actions which created the problems. Not a soul will be accountable.


  20. We must work longer!!

    Plan on working till you drop!!

    There isn’t anything fundamentally wrong with that notion.

  21. That's not rain you are dancing in Avatar
    That’s not rain you are dancing in

    NO’s contribution though sensible and well said shows that he has bought into the BS hook, line and sinker.

    It’s all a scam.

  22. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    If you explain the scam, I would be happy to admit/deny my buy in


  23. De guvnah speaketh optimistically ?

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2023/07/29/full-covid-recovery/


  24. I think I missed the part where government explained how it was planning to inject $80M a year into the fund for the next 12 years, therby replacing the $1billion of “all we money” that was written off in the restructuring.

    Of course the DEMS and Sinkyuh in his Xerox years got to hold some blows too. Sweet nuh one party printed the paper and the other party wrote it off. Now we got to work to 68 and have 700 odd installments, while the same politicians that brek up the fund will get a full pension in 2 terms. Unless I fall sleep when that change was made.


  25. Sweet nuh one party printed the paper and the other party wrote it off….ya talking bout Clearwater Bay or is it deja Vu all over again


  26. “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise, learned, and the widely read (such as Pacha) …and revealed them to little children, willing brass bowls and stinking bushmen..”
    ~~~~~~~~~~

    Unfortunately Pacha,
    You will continue to remain clueless about this, the ONLY REALLY important concept – as a result of your intellectual pride.

    You are however smart enough to understand that the great battle being waged spiritually is a BATTLE of MINDS.
    The whole POINT of the fight, is for God’s people to CHOOSE to reorientate their MINDS from the brassbowlery of albino-centric hate, greed and materialism…. and TOWARDS the path of LOVE, LIFE, God and community-centric focus.

    It must be obvious to even the most dense on the blog, that in the circumstances, God CANNOT IMPOSE such minds into brass bowls, and FORCE them to make wise choices. But can only provide a level playing field and HOPE that a few brass bowls will see the light…

    You are right about us approaching the nadir of albino-centric influence – characterized by the lotta BULLING and effeminate characterizations of modern life.

    You probably ALSO know that there are ample historical examples of how such societal tendencies end….


  27. These politicians!

    Wasn’t Sealy a member of the administration that refused to pay the NIS public sector contributions to the fund?

    Sealy: Consider other models for NIS

    By Colville Mounsey colvillemounsey@nationnews.com
    Government’s announcement on Friday that the age of retirement will be increasing is being slammed as “unconscionable” by one stalwart of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP).
    Richard Sealy, who is currently vying for leadership of the DLP, is accusing Government of pushing through the National Insurance and Social Security (Amendment) Bill, 2023, at a time when the country’s gaze is focused on Crop Over festivities.
    The Sunday Sun also reached out for comment from president of the DLP, Dr Ronnie Yearwood, but he declined. Calls were also placed to DLP candidates running for the post of president, Ryan Walters and Dr David Estwick. Walters declined to comment at this time while Estwick could not be reached.
    The amendment, which was piloted in Parliament by Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector Colin Jordan, states that in 2028 the pensionable age will become 67.5 years and 68 in 2034. Contributions required to become eligible for pensions will move from 500 weeks (ten years) to 750 weeks (15 years), with no effect on those who are 60 years or older on January 1, 2024.
    “At this stage, with all that is happening, it does come over as a little unconscionable and slipping it in at this particular time, when everybody is distracted with Crop Over, is far from acceptable. This issue of the viability of the scheme has been discussed for some time but this move is going to result in hardship. It is going to be a burden on not only pensioners of the future but employers as well,” Sealy said.
    Investors
    He said the development also had implications for employers and could have an impact on the country’s attractiveness to investors.
    “It is going to affect our ability to attract and sustain investors. The impacts are far-ranging and I am not sure that this Government has fully contemplated them all. So I can say that this is unfortunate and it is not doing anything at all to improve the quality of life for the average Barbadian. It is also not doing anything at
    all to improve our attractiveness to either domestic or foreign investment in terms of the cost of employing people,” he said.
    Sealy warned that the increase in retirement age was not likely to provide a long-lasting solution to this country’s NIS woes, sparked by a declining and aging population. He called for a more innovative approach to addressing the challenges with the scheme, one that calls for a consideration of other models.
    “At some point in time we are going to have to bite the bullet and come up with more creative ways of financing our social security system. It can’t just come down to increasing the age and increasing the rate of contribution, we are going to have to become a little more creative than that.
    “This is something that this panel of brilliant economists that we keep hearing about should wrap their minds around because we can’t just continue like this. One suggestion is to take examples from the private sector, who have interesting pension plans,” he said.
    He added: “I could see this as a challenge for sure because you are going to have to work longer and it’s going to be harder for young people to get an opportunity to get a job. Young people are already saying that Barbados is extremely difficult when it comes to finding jobs and are migrating at a tremendous rate and nobody is talking about it.”
    “This is not good news for them at all. Quite a few of them are saying that there is nothing for them in terms of opportunity and now when they do get an opportunity you are now telling them that they have to wait forever to get to retirement age,” Sealy lamented.


  28. RESERVES FLOURISHING

    Of a total of $4b, $1.1b in commercial banks
    Foreign currency deposits at commercial banks have surged to more than $1 billion nearly four years after individuals and institutions were granted permission to open such accounts.
    Central Bank Governor Dr Kevin Greenidge and his Deputy Alwyn Jordan see it as a sign that the country’s foreign reserves are in a much better position than people might think.
    At this second-quarter press conference on Friday, Greenidge said the foreign reserves were $3.1 billion at the end of June.
    He attributed the $338.5 million increase in foreign reserves mainly to strong tourism inflows, substantial disbursements from multilateral institutions to the public sector and a decrease in the value of imports.
    However, the Governor explained that when the $1.1 billion in foreign currency accounts were factored in, Barbados’ foreign reserves were essentially in excess of $4 billion.
    “I think our foreign exchange earnings capacity performance is perhaps even better than it was [during] part of COVID and coming out [of the pandemic],” Greenidge said in response to a question at the Courtney Blackman Grande Salle.
    “Foreign currency holdings at commercial banks are going through the roof, escalating. Remember, we would have allowed Barbadians to hold a foreign currency account, which means if you are producing goods and you get paid in foreign currency, you can put it in your bank account and you don’t have to bring it to the Central Bank.
    Bigger picture
    “What we have seen is a ballooning of those [foreign currency accounts]. Usually, they would have come to the Central Bank. So yes, we have to now look at the bigger picture. We have got to get away from thinking just the [foreign] reserves held at the Central Bank, but there’s also a tremendous
    amount of reserves now being held at the commercial banks that belong to individuals, corporations, etc that they don’t have to surrender.”
    His views were shared by Jordan, who told the press conference: “The total amount in foreign currency deposits was about $1.1 billion and the major component of that was for the real estate professional services of about $223 million, tourism was about $172 million and distribution about $95 million.
    “So not only are we looking at our reserves, but also we are looking at the foreign currency that’s in those accounts held by the commercial banks, and the extent to which those entities have those accounts that should almost be like their first call when it comes to their requirements, as it relates to their demands for foreign currency to meet their operational needs.”
    When access to foreign currency accounts were announced in the 2019 Budgetary Proposals, Government said it was the strategy to boost the country’s international competitiveness, support economic growth by channeling savings to productive enterprises, bolster investor confidence in Barbados and remove some of the bureaucracy and impediments that stymie business.
    Outside of foreign currency, the Central Bank data showed that domestic currency deposits reached $13.6 billion at the end of the review period.
    Greenidge reported overall that “deposits continued to grow, but at a slower pace than in the first half of 2022”. (SC)

    Source: Nation

  29. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @David
    You could do the DLP a favour and not repeat anything Sealy says.
    And given this comment in loop
    “The DLP will assess the two Bills tabled in Parliament line by line and will address the nation in the fullness of time.”
    They are probably best to say nothing at this time. The Bill on pensions (contributory) for public officers was laid weeks ago.
    Sounds like they got Crop Over fever.


  30. @NO

    Sealy is hoping to ride on public sentiment on the NIS issue given his run for president of the DLP next month.


  31. David, I don’t have any concerns with the retirement age prgressively increasing to 68 years, because people currently have the option of ‘late retirement’ at 70 years. However, I believe people should be encouraged more to plan for their retirement.


  32. @Artax

    We have many issues at play.

    -Planning outside of NIS for retirement.
    -Financial management of the fund by government.
    -The role of the Accounting House
    -An aging population

    Etc

  33. Yolande Grant - African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved Avatar
    Yolande Grant – African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved

  34. David, what should be public knowledge is how many businesses are indebted to NIS, total outstanding receivables and how they plan to enforcement payments. Or, will they ‘take the easy way out,’ by writing off the debt. I believe ‘government’ should’ve also emphasised that withholding payments of NIS and PAYE deductions from employees’ earnings is a serious offence. NIS Compliance Officers should be more active in identifying delinquent employees.


  35. @Artax

    That would be good to know, part of a holding accountable process. How active are the NIS inspectors?

  36. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Don’t have enough info to touch that

  37. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    We keep repeating the issues which are smoke screens.
    The issue is accountability.
    This PM has recently made public mention of hard, or h-a-r-d or hard-hard decisions, while contorting herself and wincing. Esp as related to the Debt restructuring.
    She has faced several difficult decisions. But the HARD decisions is when you must call out friends, colleagues, persons with your social circles, to answer for their actions.
    I put it to you…she has not made a HARD decision yet. She has avoided every HARD decision.


  38. We know what calling out ‘friends, colleagues, persons with your social circles, to answer for their actions’ will mean in a Barbados landscape. A precipitous decline in popularity the stuff that defines politician.


  39. @David
    DLP clears its hand of NIS reform suggestions tabled
    +++++++++
    I was surprised at the notion of the Government treating the DLP as an ”official” Opposition, We dun know that the BLP is not going to give the DLP any ammunition to kick start its fight against it, so I will surmise that the Minister is economical with the truth, Yuh could tell an acquaintance that you are having a party but that don’t mean that you inform them of the date and time. So, the DLP was probably advised that changes were being proposed for the pension plan but that doesn’t mean they were privy to any discussions.

    BTW “David” why did you associate the DLP statement with Sealy?


  40. Perhaps scam was too strong a word.

    This problem has been known for quite some time. The difference now is that we can no longer kick the can down the road. It is obvious to every Bajan that we need to do something and to do it quickly.

    There is nothing amazing about the solution. The key part of the solution was also known..
    get people to contribute more (750 vs 500) and
    delay paying out (move the retirement age).
    Some important bits and pieces were added on to form the bulk of the strategy.

    Nothing surprising or amazing here.


  41. @Sargeant

    It had to do with an earlier report that members running for the presidency could not be reached for comment. The association with Sealy was a slip of the fingers on the keyboard.


  42. What are the odds of an ex Black president losing two (2) Black chefs by drowning.

    Two …… Not one!

    Maybe statisticians from the NIS could calculate these odds.

    On his premises with bruises on the body.

    Wonder if any bulling was involved. For he’s the one who sanctified that business.


  43. @ David

    I believe if the NIS Inspectors or Compliance Officers were as active as they are supposed to be, there wouldn’t be so many delinquent employers.

    Many business owners often use PAYE & NIS deductions for cash flow purposes.
    Then they are unable to pay their NIS expenses and the accrued interest and penalties.
    But, employees can check with NI Office to determine whether or not their employers are paying the contributions, and take the appropriate action to rectify the issue.

    However, didn’t Sealy also made a comment that the new policies are ‘unconscionable?’


  44. The other chef who died left the White House in 2005. I looked it up. He was never Obama’s chef.

    I fear that pet peeves affect more than just Grenville’s brain on this blog.


  45. @ David

    Another thing I disagree with, is the payment of non-contributory pensions to persons who have not contributed to the fund.

    Although the criteria for payment of such pensions has changed, thereby disqualifying those persons who would’ve previously received payments, provisions are still in place for certain individuals to receive the pension, as long as they meet the prescribed requirements.

    I think the minimum amount is $230 per week.

    Both employers and employees contribute 2% each, to finance payments to persons who, for one reason or another, do not contribute thereto.

  46. DLP: The Missing Tag Team member Avatar
    DLP: The Missing Tag Team member

    Indeed, one would think that DLP has more than 0 elected members and is actively participating in parliamentary debates and writing new laws.

    And then they are some here who will blame every new ill of government on the lack of an opposition.

    The people remove refused to tag in the DLP in the last election, but some here tag them in whenever the BLP makes a major misstep.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading