← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Ministerial Statement On Revitalisation Of National Insurance Scheme
BY GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS | JUL 28, 2023 |

Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector, Colin Jordan. (FP)

Ministerial Statement on the revitalisation of the National Insurance Scheme by Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector, Colin Jordan, in the House of Assembly on Friday, July 28, 2023.

Mr. Speaker, the 17th Actuarial Review of the National Insurance Fund, the Unemployment Fund and Severance Fund as of December 31, 2020 was laid in this Honourable House on August 9, 2022. I should remind Members that the National Insurance Scheme manages these three funds along with the Catastrophe Fund and the Sugar Workers’ Provident Fund.

During the three years under review, the number of contributors decreased each year while the number of pensioners and the total pension payouts increased each year.

The Review’s assessment suggests that current contribution and benefit provisions generally provide a very good level of benefit adequacy and income protection to most workers and pensioners.  The legislated annual adjustments of the earnings limit and pensions have been effective in replacing most of the price inflation felt by pensioners and maintaining adequate coverage for higher paid workers. In other words, pensioners have generally been able to use the cost of living allowance increases to adjust to temporary price rises.

For the Review, four sets of 60-year projections of Barbados’ population and National Insurance Fund finances were performed so that a range of reasonable prospects for the Fund could be assessed.  These projections were based on there being no changes to the current contribution rate and legislated benefit rules.

Except for under the most optimistic scenario, projections indicated that between 2022 to 2025, total expenditure will exceed total income each year.  As a result, the Fund will need to rely more heavily on investment income to help meet expenditure each year. Of critical importance, eventually investments will have to be liquidated to meet the deficit and, as a result, depletion of the Fund was projected for between the years 2034 and 2041.

Mr. Speaker, it is important to note that a number of factors have contributed to where we are today.

There are the demographic factors: Our population is aging and has begun to decline. Allow me to share some statistics:
In 2015 there were 2,874 live births, 2,538 deaths, and 3,481 taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination;
In 2020 there were 2,349 live births, 2.713 deaths, and 3,381 taking the Barbados
Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination;
In 2021 there were 2,207 live births, 2,895 deaths, and 3,336 taking the Barbados
Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination; and
In 2022 there were 2,274 live births, 3,349 deaths, and 3,091 taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination.
Our total deaths per year now exceed total births. In ten years the number of children taking the Barbados Secondary Schools’ Entrance Examination will be 33% less that the current amount. These statistics make very clear the serious challenge we face. There will be fewer and fewer workers to contribute and support persons who are living longer and longer. We used to say that our population was over 280,000 and that we were heading to 300,000. The numbers now say that our population has started to decline.

Another contributing factor is the reality that when the NIS was originally designed in 1967 the average life expectancy was 68 years. In 2004 when the last adjustments were made to the NIS, life expectancy was 75 years. Today it is 78 years and expected to continue increasing.

These two trends mean that we are simultaneously suffering a reduction in the contributor base – the number of people who are paying National Insurance  – whilst paying out more in benefits to the increasing number of pensioners.

There are factors around employment status: The informal sector is growing. A higher percentage of persons are not tied to an employer and many do not participate in the social security system. Statistics suggest that less than 15% of self-employed persons contribute to NIS.

Governance factors: The structure of the NIS splits responsibilities between the Public Service and the National Insurance Board. This, as you can imagine, causes challenges in management, allocation of resources, and accountability.

This Government acted as a responsible Government should and, like it has since being elected to office in 2018, we took the people into our confidence and starting in July 2022, undertook an extensive series of consultations.

The National Insurance Fund is strong with assets of approximately $4bn with average yields on investments of 4.3%. Even though the Fund is not in crisis now, we know that we have a date with destiny between 2034 and 2041. We refused to kick the can down the road and instead took the decision to ensure that the people of Barbados will have a social security system that is sustainable and will be able to provide benefits for all, particularly the most vulnerable.

This administration has made it clear that for every major decision we will consult with the public. In order to make the eventual reforms to revitalize the NIS a reality, we met and consulted with a wide range of stakeholders including: the Social Partnership; leaders of faith-based organisations; the Democratic Labour Party; the Alliance Party for Progress; independent Senators; the Executive Committee of the National Union of Public Workers; the Executive Council of the Barbados Workers’ Union; Unity Workers Union; Barbados Association of Retired Persons; the staff of the National Insurance Department; former Ministers, chairpersons and members of the National Insurance Board; members of the private sector; and managers of media houses.

Three well-attended town hall meetings were held at Combermere School, Alexandra School and Princess Margaret Secondary School. Another town hall meeting was organized by the Democratic Labour Party at its headquarters. Additionally, suggestion boxes were placed at locations across the island, and the option to make submissions via email was facilitated. Two public surveys were also conducted which together received over 2,500 responses.

The stakeholder and town hall meetings, and the other avenues provided, allowed for scores of suggestions on how the National Insurance Scheme could and should be revitalized and placed on a sustainable footing. There was consensus that we all had a responsibility to ensure those who contributed were able to benefit when the time came for them to receive benefits.

Suggestions and proposals received addressed retirement age, contribution rates, the basis of pension calculations, participation by the self-employed, population trends in the country, investment policies, enforcing compliance, timely action to address any challenges, the need for audited financial statements, the composition and governance of the National Insurance Board, and the ability of the organisation to be nimble and responsive, among others.

A core group was established comprising Rawdon Adams, Wismar Greaves, Sir Roy Trotman, Marsha Caddle, M.P., Prof. Justin Robinson, Senator Crystal Drakes, and Actuary Derek Osbourne. This group reviewed all of the submissions and survey results and crafted a suite of suggestions based on achieving the best possible balance between benefit adequacy, contribution affordability and fund sustainability for revitalizing the NIS.

The suggestions were shared with a Working Group that included persons from the private sector, a regional development finance institution, and senior management of the National Insurance Department, and further with a larger Advisory Group of stakeholders from trade unions, academia, civil society and the public service for further discussion and comment.

The National Insurance Board was then tasked with proposing a final suite of measures for submission to The Cabinet.

Mr. Speaker, the National Insurance Board has made its submission to The Cabinet and the Cabinet has agreed proposals that I will share today with this Honourable Chamber in the Annex to this Statement, and which will be a Document of the House and therefore a public document.

These measures are designed to ensure the stability of the scheme and to make good on the assertion that “National Insurance is more than a contribution; it’s our lifeline.” The recommendations will first stabilize the National Insurance Fund and then maintain the size of its projected reserves at a level equal to or greater than two to three times the value of annual benefit expenditures.

Allow me now, Mr. Speaker, to share some of the main proposals that Cabinet has agreed.

There will be no increase in the contribution rates for employers or employees. The percentages deducted and paid to the NIS will remain as they are now.
Mr. Speaker, I mentioned earlier that when the NIS was created in 1967, life expectancy was 68 and the pensionable age then was 60, based on the idea that 8 years is an appropriate differential between life expectancy and retirement age. As of 2020, life expectancy had improved to 78 and is expected to continue improving. The pensionable age is now 67, making the current difference between average years lived and retirement age 11 years. The measure therefore recommended here is a one-year rise of the pensionable age in two steps:-In 2028 the pensionable age will become sixty-seven and a half (67.5) years
In 2034 the pensionable age becomes sixty-eight (68) years
Mr. Speaker, the public was clear that, while changes would have to be made, there was no desire to have 70 years as the pensionable age, and we have done our utmost to honour that desire.

3. Today, the first age to qualify for a reduced pension  is 60 years. There will be a change to this age in three steps:-

61 in 2025
62 in 2028
63 in 2031
4. There will be an increase in the number of contributions required to become eligible for pension from five hundred (500) weeks (approximately 10 years) to seven hundred and fifty (750) weeks (approximately 15 years) with no effect on those sixty (60) years or older on January 1, 2024.  For comparison, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago and St. Lucia also saw it necessary to fix their number of contributions required at 750, and others in the region who are currently at 500 are moving in a similar direction. For persons less than sixty (60) years old on January 1, 2024, the number of contributions required increases by thirty (30) weeks per year until 2030 and becomes seven hundred and fifty (750) weeks in 2031.

It is understood that, with most persons starting to work by their early to midtwenties, the requirement for contributing to the National Insurance Scheme for at least fifteen (15) years is entirely reasonable and brings us into line with international benchmarks.

In this transition, however, we are making sure that persons who are already sixty years old, or will be sixty years or older by January 1, 2024 will not be affected.

5. The National Insurance and Social Security Act will be amended to indicate that the National Insurance Board will develop a Funding Policy, and any adjustment being proposed to the policy by the Board must be laid in Parliament.  The Minister responsible for Social Security must respond to the Board’s proposal within six (6) weeks of the document being laid in Parliament.

Mr. Speaker, the fact that we are where we are today reforming and revitalising the NIS so significantly is due in large measure to past inaction. As far back as 2014 was when benefit expenditure first outstripped contribution income. Yet no corrective action was taken, despite the flashing warning. To stop this damaging delay happening ever again a Funding Policy and a Compulsory Adjustment Mechanism will be incorporated into the National Insurance and Social Security Act. These amendments will ensure timely intervention to keep the Fund on track to meet its revitalisation goals.

6. There will be a change where the wages used to calculate the pension benefit will be the “Best 10 years” rather than the ‘Best 5 years”.

Many persons were opposed to what is considered an abuse of the system, where some persons contribute at the maximum for five years then stop, and are still able to enjoy the maximum pension. Going forward the basis for calculating pension will be the best ten years.

There will be an aggressive approach to encouraging and enforcing compliance with the legislation governing the National Insurance Scheme. Officers from the Compliance Unit will be in the field, and the Office will use all measures at its disposal to ensure the law is adhered to, including using garnishments or the Law Courts.

A critical aspect of the revitalization of the National Insurance Scheme will be the implementation of a new regime that is more flexible, and simplifies the process for self-employed persons to participate in the NIS by way of making contributions and receiving benefits. We expect that this will result in higher enrolment by selfemployed persons in the National Insurance Scheme.

Before I go on, Mr. Speaker, please allow me to reiterate that the classification of a person as self-employed is not determined by any construction or other company’s management making a unilateral decision that a carpenter or labourer or steel bender is to be treated as self-employed just so that the responsibility and cost of social security is evaded. There are set criteria based on case law that are used by both the Labour Department and the National Insurance Department to make the determination. Good employers know what those criteria are and abide by them.

The new regime for persons registered as self-employed will provide an innovative approach and formula for converting contributions to weeks and wages and a corresponding mechanism to determine short-term benefit eligibility.

I will use an example from an industry that I am familiar with to make the point. A taxi driver will ordinarily generate decent cash flow during the November to April period. They may make some money again in July/August. Currently if the taxi driver does not pay contributions in May and June, or September to November, the system will say that she or he is delinquent and owes contributions – and levies penalties, not taking into account the seasonal nature of the business. The same goes for entertainers who may earn most of their money during Carnival or Crop Over, or artisans who may work on a house for three months and then may be out of work for a month before the next job begins. And in a third-decade-of-the-twenty-firstcentury world, Gig entrepreneurs have a similar challenge.

In the first phase, we expect that:

Self-employed persons will be able to pay their contributions without having to complete schedules or specify a period;
They will be able to make their payments via Bank Bill Pay, credit card, cheque or cash;
Confirmation of receipt of payment will be sent via email;
There will be an online interface which allows the self-employed to view submitted contribution payments; and
There will be the ability to pay at any time during the year.
Thereafter, we expect that:

Self-employed persons will be able to make payments using the NIS portal or using EZPay.
The contribution payments of all self-employed persons will be converted to earnings.
Self-employed persons will be notified of their short-term benefit status for each year.
Short-term and long-term benefits will be computed using the new payment regime; and
Self-employed persons will be able to apply for and receive Clearance Certificates.
Mr. Speaker, allow me to share with the Chamber and with the people of Barbados that a Cabinet Paper on the introduction of paternity leave benefit to allow the granting of paid paternity leave has been prepared and will soon be sent to The Cabinet.

Additionally, the NIS Regulations will be amended to allow persons who have not made the requisite contributions to qualify for a pension to be able to catch up or become current with the understanding that a premium will have to be paid for the privilege.

Mr. Speaker, when we came to office we found out that NIS contributions for public officers had not been paid since 2015. This Government has paid up the $250m that was owing. At the same time we have been staying current with payments. Because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic this Government has recapitalized the Unemployment Benefit Fund to the tune of $143m. Prior to this this administration coming to office in 2018 Government owed the NIS $83.5m for non-contributory pensions. This outstanding debt has been cleared. $66m has also been paid toward the Training Levy.

Some of the matters raised by persons related to the governance of the Scheme. During our consultations, we shared the hybrid nature of the current structure where some functions related to the Ministry of the Public Service and others related to the Board. It is not fully a Government Department and it is not fully a state-owned enterprise. We are in the final stages of transitioning the current structure into a commercial state-owned enterprise.

Mr. Speaker, a country’s social security system is intended to be a safety net for persons in their time of need – whether for maternity, or in cases of illness or employment injury, or, importantly, for old-age pension. The sustainability of the system is critical to the well-being of citizens.

The Government of Barbados will continue to do right by the people of Barbados. We today share measures that were designed through extensive consultation, careful modelling and deliberate assessment, are human-centred, and take into account our realities.

We are confident that they will serve to revitalize the National Insurance Scheme and protect our people for many years to come.

Mr. Speaker, I am obliged to you.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

110 responses to “SOS Ministerial Statement on the NIS”


  1. @Donna
    I provided the following earlier, but it looks as if I have to throw it against the wall a few times to get it to stick.

    Barack Obama’s chef is 2nd White House chef to die by drowning
    short by Ankush Verma / 01:23 pm on 25 Jul 2023,Tuesday
    Former US President Barack Obama’s personal chef Tafari Campbell whose body was found in a lake on Martha’s Vineyard is the second White House chef to have died by drowning. Walter Scheib, a former executive chef during the administrations o
    f Presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush,
    drowned accidentally in 2015 after going on a hike in Taos, New Mexico.

  2. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    At least you know then why all are spinning top in the mud.
    Bajans got nuff money or they would be pushing back.


  3. @Artax

    Are those payments to non contributory paid from NIS or from MoF?


  4. TheO,

    Didn’t see it, but I knew there is just no way I would have missed it if two of Obama’s chefs had died by drowning.

    From the looks of the first one, he wasn’t even black.

    No better than a right-wing looney!


  5. Do you think a country that jumps for joy when receiving US $30M from the IMF can truly afford to write off/forgive
    US $ 0.5 – 1 Billion
    (BDS $ 1-2B)

    The maths does not add up.


  6. https://www.youtube.com/live/iDJwEB_D_K8?feature=share

    It all over the British press. Maybe because they have more gutter jounalism.

    Maybe because the wokeist in America, operating as a banana republic, to shield the useful idiots from any derogatory information about the woke leaders Obama and Biden. Two much beloved criminals.

    George Galloway is a former MP for 30 years. Has been previously invited to Barbados at tax payers’ expense and is the leader of a political party.

    Check the British tabloids!

    Weeeeeeeereeee still haven’t said anything, anything, here which cannot be proven are otherwise justify.

    And those who would so presume should become aquainted with the rigour of academic standards.


  7. Obama is not my son. I don’t care about him that way. What I care about is grown men and women spreading silly lies for no reason.

    Tabloids indeed!

    They make shit up to catch fools.

    Your currency that is going to topple the US dollar isn’t going to happen as you predicted either. I’ve been reading up on BRICS.

    Apparently, if and when it does happen, it will be a “chipping away” rather than a “decapitation”.

    “Chipping away”! Now, who’s always advocating for a “chipping away” and who for a “decapitation”?

    I nearly died when I read those descriptions!

    Murdaaaaaaaaaah!


  8. Well, a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.

    For general information. Trading by Brics in national currencies is the real deal. This is galloping!

    The resources backed Brics currency which will displace the USD was never said by anybody
    to happen overnight. Countries are storing gold. Russia and China are the largest holders.

    Just the mere thought of that is staggering. That this would happen overnight. Even as sentiment within financial markets is already effecting how players behave.

    However, the mere use of national currencies for Trading is enough to dethrone the USD. As trade transactions in USD have dropped to about 50 percent from a recent high of 70 or 80 percent.

    This is a highly complex matter and a number of other things are happening.

    The mere agreement by Brics in SA to have their reserve currency was always only the first step. Just like the NDB is a first step against the IMF and World Bank. But the growing boycott of the USD is inflicting massive damage to the wokeist empire. Watch it!

    Read some more!


  9. Artax on July 30, 2023 at 5:30 PM said:
    Rate This

    @ David

    Another thing I disagree with, is the payment of non-contributory pensions to persons who have not contributed to the fund.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    When NIS first started many years ago in the 60’s, no one had made any contributions whatsoever but clearly many were on the verge of retirement if not retired.

    Employers who had employees close to or past retirement age were faced with the added cost of NIS contributions for all.

    For example, many plantations in the sugar industry, the major employer at the time, chose to let the older folk go home rather than incur the cost of contributing to the NIS fund.

    The cost of the non-contributory pensions fell on the NIS as it should have done.

    Paid employment is a problem and has always been a problem in Barbados. Many women for example in that era stayed home and while they may have found a way of generating income it was small even though it provided a measure of self- respect even if for many women it meant being subservient to men.

    In addition, people looked out for each other …. breadfruit was free. Now even that has to be bought from Massy.

    If the socialist model is to provide for all and Government has sold the idea to everybody, that it is socialist and socialism is a good thing, it would seem that non-contributory old age pensions are a must, a cost of doing business and necessary to maintain a peaceful society.

    … but as always, nothing in this life is free, somebody has to pay for socialism, and it is always the socialists!!

    I’ve always made the point that in slavery the plantation fed, clothed, housed and provided medical care from cradle to grave and was effectively a socialist utopia.

    Non-contributory old age pensions were borne by the plantation.

    The plantation has been replaced today by the socialist Government.

    Everybody has to give some of their labour every month in the form of NIS contributions to the Government for free, a cost of working for wages.

    Likewise, every business which employs persons must give the Government a berry when the month comes.

    Noone has a choice.

    It’s called socialism and all socialists are by definition miserable!!


  10. “Are those payments to non contributory paid from NIS or from MoF?”

    @ David

    To qualify for non-contributory old-age pension, one must be:
    Sixty-seven (67) years of age or in the case of a blind person or a deaf mute, the age of 18 years; and

    A). a citizen of Barbados; or

    B). a permanent resident of Barbados within the meaning of the Immigration Act, with residence in Barbados for a period of:

    in the case of a citizen of Barbados, 12 years since attaining the age of 40 years or an aggregate of 20 years since attaining the age of 18 years; or
    in the case of a permanent resident or Barbados, 15 years since attaining the age of 40 years or an aggregate of 20 years since attaining the age of 18 years. [Source: NIS website]


  11. I’ve always made the point that in slavery the plantation fed, clothed, housed and provided medical care from cradle to grave and was effectively a socialist utopia.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    And, I’ve always made the point that slavery was a degradation of Africans who were not treated as HUMAN BEINGS, but CLASSIFIED as CHATTEL……

    …… LEGAL PROPERTY of their owners, to be BOUGHT, OWNED or SOLD similarly to LIVESTOCK.

    So, plantation owners did not care for slaves “from cradle to the grave” because they LOVED them.

    They were essentially PROTECTING their ‘investment.’

    Similarly, for example, to how they ‘fed, housed and provided medical attention’ for their HORSES or COWS.

    Or, nowadays, how a plantation owner would ensure his tractor is always full of fuel, parked in a garage to ‘protect it from the elements,’ and have an in house mechanic in the event it ‘broke down’ or developed a mechanical fault….

    …… ‘until the end of its useful life.’


  12. Artax on July 31, 2023 at 8:22 PM said:
    Rate This

    I’ve always made the point that in slavery the plantation fed, clothed, housed and provided medical care from cradle to grave and was effectively a socialist utopia.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    And, I’ve always made the point that slavery was a degradation of Africans who were not treated as HUMAN BEINGS, but CLASSIFIED as CHATTEL……

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    So, you are agreeing with me but adding the obvious observation that socialism like slavery degrades all who are slaves to it.

    It took a dose of evangelical Christianity from some of the first evangelical Christians, the Quakers, to end slavery.

    What will it take to end socialism?


  13. This is a good one too.

  14. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    John are you really that fucked in the head, or do you just figure what you learned at the family gatherings will suffice to piss others off?


  15. NorthernObserver
    on July 31, 2023 at 10:14 PM said:
    Rate This

    John are you really that fucked in the head, or do you just figure what you learned at the family gatherings will suffice to piss others off?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Here’s the really funny thing.

    I learnt about the Great Awakenings in third form with Captain Hut but never understood their significance until 54 years later.

    I’m not making this up, it is all a matter of history, facts that can be checked.

    This is some beautiful stuff I need to share.

    The Moravians and then the Methodists arrived in Barbados about a century after the Quakers, check the History.

    All were Evangelical Christians.


  16. Unions’ pension pitch

    UWU plans sick-out; NUPW to meet; BWU no part of protest
    by ANTOINETTE CONNELL antoinetteconnell@nationnews.com
    ONE UNION IS plotting a sick-out while another will huddle in discussion this week over Government’s attempt to move the retirement age from 67 to 68 years and adjust the length of contributions.
    However, while the Unity Workers’ Union (UWU) is calling for others to join in the protest action tomorrow and the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) says its top brass has to meet urgently on the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) issue, the Barbados Workers’ Union (BWU) says it has no connection to the protest.
    General secretary of UWU, Caswell Franklyn said the action came out of an online meeting with more than 500 union members and consumer advocates on Sunday night upset by Government’s move to have Barbadians working longer before they received their pensions.
    He charged that there was no need to have legislation at this time with two holidays and the festive Crop Over season in the air. The matter was debated in the House of Assembly last week and is scheduled to be debated in the Senate and given approval before becoming law.
    “We suggested that the workers should protest then because it is going to hurt each and every one in Barbados. We decided we would let the people be aware that the workers are not pleased,” Franklyn said.
    Minster of Labour and Social Security Colin Jordan, in reaction, said he had a certain faith in Barbadians being reasonable people, stating that in the end everyone wants the National Insurance Scheme to be around for others to use it.
    “I just hope that good sense will prevail and that all of us realise that we have to rally around the scheme and make sure it survives and that it is better to act early than to act late. I would appeal to Barbadians rally with us,” he said.
    Jordan said that once they had the actuarial report there was extensive consultation on how Barbadians felt about the measures to be taken and it decided to act now because the sustainable measures for the NIS would not be as tough.
    “If not the measures would have to be much tougher because then we would have to bring the situation back from a pretty serious situation.”
    Meantime, the NUPW said it was not part of the planned protest as any action to be undertaken must be sanctioned by its national council.
    “There has been a move for the executive committee and the national council to meet to discuss NUPW position on the proposed changes to reform the National Insurance pension. They will meet this week in response to some of the concerns of our members in furtherance to previous discussions we had,” said general secretary Richard Green.
    Attention
    The matter, he said, had engaged the attention of the national council prior to this latest episode. The BWU said in its statement: “We want to be unequivocal, forceful, and absolutely clear on this matter: The Barbados Workers’ Union has no connection, knowledge, or involvement in any planned sick-out, nor has our executive council endorsed or promoted such action.”
    The union stated that
    it had been drawn to its attention that messages were circulating regarding the islandwide sick-out tomorrow and alongside the messages, a video produced by the BWU, celebrating two significant holidays for its workers.
    Celebratory piece
    “The video that has been circulated, while authentic and produced by the BWU, is strictly a celebratory piece for the holidays and must not be misinterpreted or linked with the rumours regarding industrial action. The two are in no way connected.
    “We strongly condemn any attempt to associate the BWU with actions that we have not sanctioned, and we urge all concerned parties to dismiss these erroneous and misleading associations,” the statement read.
    (AC)

    Source: Nation


  17. Dems eyeing two pension bills

    THE DEMOCRATIC LABOUR PARTY (DLP) says it is closely watching the two pieces of “important legislation” relating to National Insurance Scheme (NIS), pensions, and retirement.
    The Pensions (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill and the National Insurance and Social Security (Amendment) Bill, were tabled in Parliament on Friday and has caused a stir among members of the public.
    Under the change over a ten-year period the retirement age will move from 67 to 68 years. There will also be adjustments to the length of contributions to qualify for pensions.
    “Contrary to the statement by Minister Colin Jordan in Parliament, the DLP was not part of the consultation for the Advisory Group on the NIS as the government abruptly removed the party from discussions without explanation after the DLP inquired about details, since the DLP holds a firm view that consultation has to be meaningful and not merely window dressing.
    “Therefore, the decisions the government arrived at were its decisions and whomever it engaged,” the DLP said in statement over the weekend.
    Will assess in due time
    The DLP will assess the two bills tabled in Parliament line by line and will address the nation in the fullness of time, the party said.
    “Given that the legislation will touch the lives of all Barbadians and its impact will be far-reaching, the DLP believes it is important to review the legislation in detail,” the statement added.
    Minister of Labour and Social Security Colin Jordan had delivered a ministerial statement on the issue on Friday in the House of Assembly. The bills are set to go before the Senate tomorrow for debate and approval.
    Jordan said those who are 60 years now and nearing retirement have been shielded from the changes.
    He said there were certain things which the town hall meetings and consultations with others revealed and the administration had tailored the measures accordingly.
    “A couple of things people had said they did not want to hear. One was a 70-year pensionable age. That was very clear. The second, they did not want the feeling that people were scamming the system, contributing for a little bit and still drawing the benefit.
    “The other thing that quite a few people did not want at the time – I suspect because people could feel the inflationary pressure – and that was not to touch the contribution rate because that could have been an option. We could have changed the contribution rate but we decided not to do that because persons were concerned about their takehome pay and their ability to survive when they have more [money] being taken out,” the Minister told the DAILY NATION yesterday.
    He stated that the matter of revitalising the NIS was one of the deciding factors in choosing the options available to take Barbados and the fund to safety and sustainability.
    “We thought we would take a gradualist approach,” he said.
    The next six months, he said, would be dedicated to an education programme for communities on the proposed changes and importance of the fund.
    (AC)

    Source: Nation


  18. Let us see if many Barbadians march or sickout over the new NIS changes. We know they have no interest marching or staging a sick out because of delayed audited NIS financials, therein lies the problem.


  19. Mia, recently, implored Barbadians to stop playing the fool.

    The breaking news’s story that the GOB did not pay NIS contributions for those emergency workers during the covid-19 period should not surprise anyone. The oversight, and ‘width and breadth of incompetence from this government is standard practice. This is unacceptable.

    We also know that a sizeable minority of private companies simply do not pay NIS contributions for their workers. What a sad indictment of our country.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2023/07/31/govt-clears-air-on-nis-payments-for-short-term-contract-workers/

  20. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Why march over changes? They back off on one of many and someone declares victory?
    Then next year they increase benefits by 2% but contributions by 10% and annul the back off change.
    You have to march over the criminal acts which led to the changes. Unless there is a consequence, the actions will repeat themselves.
    You already read the problem in the Ministers address, it is structure. The entity needs restructuring.
    Doesn’t change one shite as long as the rules and laws are abused without consequence.
    But @David already told me it cannot be done, due to political fallout lol So keep on tekking it up the bazonga, dey laffin at we?


  21. @NO

    You have to understand the thinking of the average Barbadian, no criminal or even a moral act was committed.


  22. We have become too immersed in the political quagmire. Every issue must be pars through a political lens.

  23. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    “He made clear the matter had been resolved.

    “Government recognised an issue in terms of some of the short-term hirings. Government has moved to correct those issues.”

    Bajan journalists? If it had been resolved the Government would say the issues have been corrected, not moved to correct.

    And they go on again

    “Now, initially, some of those persons were not included in the National Insurance Scheme. Government has recognised its error and all of those persons have been included now in the national insurance roll and the contributions are paid jointly by the employees and the employer in this case being Government. So that matter has been rectified,” he said.

    What is rectified? Including them on a roll, or paying to NIS.

  24. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Well then the average Barbadian deserves to be screwed.
    Let’s jump on the gravy train and keep on screwing them!!!


  25. “Well then the average Barbadian deserves to be screwed.
    Let’s jump on the gravy train and keep on screwing them!!!”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Northern O gets the unfortunate reality…

    But it is a bit worse…
    The average Barbadian is a brass bowl …who enjoys being used as a topsy…
    The politicians and lawyers have chosen to oblige them….
    The journalists are trained to convince them that they are being blessed…
    The Blogmaster hates the smell, but fails to see any alternative than changing the politician’s diet to vegan.


  26. @Bush Tea

    The analogy is not correct, the blogmaster prefers to use Vaseline to help.


  27. The analogy is not correct, the blogmaster prefers to use Vaseline to help.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    LOL
    Murduh!!!!
    Lord come fuh yuh wurl !!!!

    David …..yuh gallows bait boss!!!!


  28. The big big irony is that whatever happens to the NIS fund it will have to be funded directly or indirectly by taxpayers.


  29. @Sargeant

    Your man Walter is on the air NOW discussing NIS matters among others.



  30. Just remember, we have not had a constitutional Parliament since 2018. Everything Ms. Mockley and her “ministers” have done is null, void and of no effect.

    Just needs some smart Alec to take a Constitutional Motion to Court!!

    Should have been done ever since, doing nothing has only empowered the 20 members of the House of Assembly who are yet to form a constitutional Parliament.


  31. @David

    Thanks, I saw this late as I was otherwise occupied. Hope his contribution was well received.


  32. “In 2028, the pensionable age will become 67.5 years and in 2034, the age will rise to 68 years.”

    This is what the internet says.

    Good chance we will get some unrest.

    We really need to hold these pretenders’ feet to the fire, should have done so since 2018.



  33. Help muh. Does the PM speak of a loan (repayable), a grant (gift) or a groan(confusion)?


  34. She seems desperate for attention!!

    Tomorrow may be interesting as people don’t sound happy with the NIS which goes to the unconstitutional Senate!


  35. Too far east is west some say.

    Former administration was labeled the government of silence.

    What we need is to find a way to hold public officials accountable.

    This is the crux of the matter.


  36. “Help muh. Does the PM speak of a loan (repayable), a grant (gift) or a groan(confusion)?”

    Grain. You heard grain.


  37. The problem is that “the software don’t talk to each other”?????

    What a roll of shiite!!
    They spend MILLIONS of dollars and countless hours on medical software systems – not to mention license fees, upgrades and training, only to now ‘discover’ that these don’t “talk to each other”????

    …so some smart aleck now tells us with a straight face that we must scrap the millions ALREADY SPENT, and borrow millions MORE for a new system that ‘speaks the same language’…. what nonsense!!

    Next five years (and 50 million later), we will hear that this new system speaks a common language ok, but needs to be scrapped because it is not “compatible with brass bowls”, or some joker don’t like it…and that we need a new brassbolic system costing $100million.

    Only brass bowl Bajans can sit and watch their money being frittered away with such nonsense …over and over and over… and just jump at Kadooment.

    Who are being disciplined for the failures of the current useless systems?
    Who were fired?
    What went wrong, and how has it been fixed?
    Who is going to take responsibility for this new system’s success?

    This emotional grandstanding on TV about getting ‘cheap loans’ is becoming TIRESOME….even for Bajan brass bowls.
    lotta shiite!!


  38. If you truly believe Parliament is unconstitutional, why not use some of the funds you inherited from your ancestors, off the backs of plantation labourers, to test such unconstitutionality in Court, rather than talk shiite?

  39. Yolande Grant - African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved. Avatar
    Yolande Grant – African Online Publishing Copyright (c) 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    Dont understand how the mental programming is geared toward dependency only…in 2023…so then how will it be in 2030 – 2040 – 2050….since it is glaring i see others planning for those eventualities, but not the talking machine…they remain on one trajectory only…beg, borrow..

    Looks like there is a mismatch between fantasy and reality…a total disconnect…..and for some inexplicable and despicable reason they refuse to do what comes naturally like those connected to the real world…

  40. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    “Who are being disciplined for the failures of the current useless systems?”
    I enjoy your comedic efforts.
    The parliamentarian in charge was fired by the voters.
    The two senior public employees associated are no longer employed by the GoB.
    The contractor who “bid” and “installed” the system is no longer in business.

    But…even when we know the body, nothing will happen.

    The 17th Actuarial Audit noted that the NIS’s Investment Policy Statement had not been followed for many years. This is not a Board matter. An operational execution. The grand fromage, of the NIS after multi years in that role,was promoted, as the Dir of Finance. It was HIS job. You ever seen a public inquiry where he was questioned as to the execution of HIS responsibility as Mg Dir? But he got an additional high honour.

    You cannot make this shit up 😁😁


  41. #themosthonourable


  42. Sickout called for seems to have failed from all reports.

  43. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Lol, then he will have to accost someone and get arrested. He could be on remand for years?
    Peculiar how this PM protects the former minister who is assoc with CBL, NIS, debt overload, illegal direction of NIS contributions and yet don’t have the time of day for others?


  44. #peers

    #politicalclass


  45. Off topic, the proposed sit 8n demonstration planned by the in my view attention seeking Mr Franklyn from all accounts turned out to be a dismal failure.Who is surprised? Without the support of the BWU and NUPW it was bound to fail.When contacted Mr Franklyn instead of conceeding it was a failure went on some talk about representing some lady.Really?You organize a sit in and do not attend or know of it, s outcome.Give me a break.There is a group of you would like to see this government fall with your antics.On the call in programme they are about 10 of them all dems that confuse brasstacks everyday.Persons like Ms decided, Mr P, Alvin, Rawle, Mr Bascmbe,Ms P, Straker,s, Blessed day, Mr Bascombe and Velma who wanted Barbados cleaned up for the return of Mr Inniss who she claimed is her relative.These persons are accomadated without challenge by in my view poor rakey moderatos like Dr Hinds , Mr Wilkinson and Ms JemmottIn my view most people can see right through their agendas.Starcom needs to do a lot better as that programme has gone to the dogs and turned off a lot of listeners and it is not helping the DLP.I gone.


  46. An interesting change. It makes one wonder why it was necessary. The last minute decision has added to concerns about the changes to the two Bills.

    Senate debate on pension age postponed

    WHILE BARBADIANS WAITED with interest for the outcome of yesterday’s Senate debate on proposed changes to the island’s National Insurance Scheme, the scheduled sitting was adjourned less than ten minutes after it started.
    As a result, individuals eager to know whether the National Insurance And Social Security (Amendment) Bill 2023 passed in the House of Assembly last week, will get the green light in the Senate, will have to wait until next Wednesday, when the Senate meets again.
    The amendments to the legislation propose drastic changes to Barbados’ National Insurance Scheme and have been the subject of much contention and discussion over the past few days.
    Government’s intended changes to the National Insurance Scheme were announced by Minister of Labour, Social Security and the Third Sector Colin Jordan during last week’s sitting of the House of Assembly where he introduced the Bill.
    According to the amendment, in 2028 the pensionable age will become 67.5 years and 68 in 2034.
    Laid two papers
    At the beginning of yesterday’s Senate sitting, Leader of Government Business Senator Lisa Cummins first laid two papers – the National Insurance Board’s Principal Recommendations for the Revitalisation of the National Insurance Scheme and The Barbados Arms Trade Treaty Initial Report. Following
    this, she moved the first reading of the National Insurance And Social Security (Amendment) Bill 2023. However, minutes after the President of the Senate Reginald Farley announced Government business was the Order of the Day, clearing the way for Cummins to open debate on the Bill, she rose and announced: “Mr President, due to a number of considerations today, the business of the Senate has now concluded.
    “We will have a separate internal meeting of the Senate to be able to deal with a matter before us that is preparatory for some of the Bills that are on the agenda and so, with these very few words today, I beg to move that this sitting be adjourned until Wednesday August 9, at 11 a.m.” (GC)

    Source: Nation


  47. Unless I missed it none of the major unions in the country have commented publicly about these changes. Caswell as the spokesperson for his fledging Union has declared his opposition to the amendments but from the others the silence has been deafening. In my book silence means assent thus the Unions representing most of the workers in the island are perfectly happy with the changes.

    In my neck of the woods when a previous provincial Gov’t enacted changes to deal with the recession the Premier of the day sang “we are in the same boat”. Politicians and workers are likely in boats but they are hardly the same “boat”, while politicians are in luxury yachts with all the trappings, workers are in essentially dinghies at the mercy of the most moderate of swells. These most recent changes are an example of how politicians take their constituents for granted ( I could use stronger language) but they didn’t even try to throw a sop to the masses by pretending that “we are in the same boat” and we will amend the qualification to receive a pension by a year or two to show solidarity with the public.

    This Government doesn’t miss a beat when it comes to financially rewarding its members or supporters, from the largest Cabinet in Barbados history, to piggybacking on public workers increases, to “we have a crime problem, time for a new Minister”. How about the parliamentarian who made a fuss about his salary and was the retired to a diplomatic post with pension and salary for his new role intact; or the individual who was relegated to the backbench and complained so loudly that he was made a “poverty czar” with the requisite salary adjustment. This is a government that was elected to repair the ills of the previous one, but it is déjà vu all over again.

    All together now “We are in the same boat”.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading