← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by By Dr. Kumar Mahabir

It sits innocently in the Undergraduate Humanities Programmes list, alphabetically bookended by Theatre Arts and Visual Arts. Yet the University of the West Indies (UWI) Bachelor of Arts BA Theology degree is a jarring testament to the religious and ethnic discrimination that still exists in the highest institution of education in our nation, paying lip service to diversity, equity and inclusion as core values.

Taught every year at the St Augustine (Trinidad) campus by members of the Seminary of St John Vianney and the Ugandan Martyrs since 1970, UWI’s Theology degree is unapologetically Christian and Catholic in content. The syllabus comprises courses in Biblical and Pastoral Studies, History of the Christian Church in the Caribbean, Perspectives in Christology, and Principles of Christian Ethics.

But Trinidad and Tobago is an ethnically diverse society. While the largest segment of the population is Christian, a significant portion – almost 20% – is Hindu, 5.7% is Spiritual Baptist /Shouter, 5% is Muslim, and a small proportion is Rastafarian, Orishan and other denominations. Moreover, a growing percentage considers itself non-religious (2.2%) or does not choose to state its religion (11.1%). Ideally, the theology programme at the nation’s prime tertiary institution should reflect this diversity. But this is not the case, despite it not even being the first time that this concern has been raised.

Almost 20 years ago, Parshuram Maharaj, an executive member of the Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha, wrote a well-reasoned letter, published in the Newsday on October 7, 2003. He pointed out that while the meaning of theology has traditionally been restricted to a narrow understanding due to its Greek and Christian origin, in the broadest sense, it is widely accepted as meaning “the science of God or of religion; the science which teaches of the existence, character and attributes of God, his laws and government, the doctrines we are to believe, and the duties we are to practice; divinity”. He called on UWI to offer a Theology degree that reflected and represented the entire religious spectrum, as many of the leading universities of the world now do.

The University of Oxford, for example, which has a long history of preparing young men for the church, now offers Sanskrit, Pali and Qur’anic Arabic with New Testament Greek, Biblical Hebrew and Church Latin, and includes courses on Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism. Harvard University provides courses in African and Afro-Atlantic Religions, Ancient Near Eastern / Israelite religions, Buddhism, Christianity, East Asian religions, Greek-Hellenistic-Roman religions, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Religion in the Modern West / Religions of the Americas, and South Asian religions.

While no one is expecting UWI to provide so many alternatives, what it offers now fails the needs of this nation’s diverse population. There are private universities in Trinidad and Tobago that offer exclusively Christian theology programmes, as is their right to do so. But UWI is a not a private university. It is a public institution funded by taxpayers – Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Spiritual Baptist /Shouter, Orishan, Rastafarian, atheist, etc. – all taxpayers.

Since Maharaj’s impassioned plea 20 years ago, nothing has changed. Is it any wonder, though, for according to UWI’s most recent prospectus, the Theology Department comprises 2 bishops, 2 monseigneurs, 5 nuns and 16 reverends among its 27 academic staff? Not a lot of religious diversity there. In UWI’s Theology degree, Hinduism, Islam and “Afro-Caribbean Expressions” are mentioned in just one course – Comparative Religion – out of a total of 38.

But this must change, even it has to be taken to the Privy Council by my eminent attorney, Anand Ramlogan, SC.

In her induction speech on January 22, 2023, the new Principal of the St Augustine Campus of UWI, Professor Rose-Marie Belle Antoine, spoke compellingly of the need for UWI to be more inclusive and to play a key role in healing wounds in our society. An excellent starting point for this, if such encouraging words are to be taken seriously. The new Principal should now remove religious bias from the Theology Department and provide complementary Hindu and Islamic programmes, while a certificate or diploma programme can be introduced for smaller religious groups.

Why not allow non-Christian religious denominations to design and deliver their own programmes with university funding, support, cooperation and supervision, as the Catholic seminary has been doing since 1970? There could at least be a Centre for Hindu Studies similar to the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies. Muslims and others could also create their own syllabi. The sooner this happens the better. In 2019, UWI registered only 11 new admissions to, and 4 graduates from, the Theology Department, suggesting that a serious overhaul is needed in order to create dynamic programmes relevant to our whole society. This will be a vital step on the path to making Trinidad and Tobago a nation where “every creed and race” can truly “find an equal place”.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

103 responses to “UWI Discrimination: Why no Hindu or Islamic BA Theology degree?”

  1. You Gotta Believe (2020 Acapella DJ Tool) Avatar
    You Gotta Believe (2020 Acapella DJ Tool)

    Here is a good DJ Tool to mix with your favourite instrumental beats

    You gotta believe in something

    Why not believe in me?

    believe

    believe in me

    you gotta believe


  2. The history & theology department at UWI & other academic institutions in Barbados/ Region are run by crack head professors & ventriloquist dummies who regurgitate all the lies created by albino Europeans since their rise to power.


  3. Albinos take control of religion in Europe & Asia.

    Historically camouflaged as Civil Wars in Britain, and the supposedly Religious “Thirty Years Wars” on the continent.

    Thirty Years War” on the continent and the British “Civil Wars” of the 1600s. These were of course actually “Race Wars” with religion as the focal point. These wars pitted Europe’s ancient Black and Catholic Rulers against the rebellious Albinos who had “In-mass” been chased out of their Homelands in Asia by the Mongols and into the Black lands of Europe.
    Black Europe was never “Densely Populated”, so this massive influx of millions upon millions of Asian Albinos was sure to cause a “Seed Change” in Europe: and of course it did, it just took over two thousand years for it to happen.
    The original Black Europeans (Catholics) went to war with the Central Asian Albinos (Germanics & Slav’s) under the banner of their newly created “PROTEST” “Protestant” Religions. i.e. Anglican, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Amish, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Quakers, Seventh-Day Adventism, et al.
    After the conquest, the Catholic Church was also usurped, but the Slav’s in the East like the (Russians), chose not to completely overhaul the Eastern Orthodox branch that they took from the Byzantines. As a result, their Holy icons still have “Dark” Skin.
    Sometime after the Protestant Reformation, the Catholic Church also fell under the control of Europe’s Albinos. For the western Catholic church, new statues and paintings of the Madonna and the Saints were created – they now depicted Albinos. The Albinos developed cottage industries devoted to creating new statues and paintings which looked like ancient artifacts. However for the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Black Madonna’s and Saints were mostly kept, though now with mostly Albino features.
    The Truth Hidden in Plain Sight: A Black Freising King is depicted on the Pope’s “Coat of Arms”.The Freising King (probably Otto I) is shown with a ring in his ear.
    Black Moors/ Black King/Queens/Generals/ Knights/Saints/ Bishops,etc are depicted on coats of arms/ manuscripts/ churches/ castles ,etc all over Europe.

    The later arriving Turks took over the Black Arabs newly created religion of Islam.
    After their conquest of Europe, the Albinos went on to conquer the entire WORLD, and each place they settled brought them the SAME problems: SUNBURN and SKIN CANCER. Because they don’t belong in those places, their one and ONLY home is Central Asia!

    Arabs & ISlAM:
    THE ARABIAN PENINSULA IS MAINLY A HOT, HOT, DESERT.
    MECCA’S UV (ultra violet) INDEX IS THE MAX. OF (11) FOR MOST OF THE YEAR.
    WHITE OR “ALMOST” WHITE PEOPLE COULD NOT SURVIVE IN ARABIA WITHOUT BEING COVERED FROM “HEAD-TO-TOE” WITH CLOTHING!
    THE NOTION THAT THESE PEOPLE COULD BE NATIVE TO ARABIA IS A SILLY JOKE TO MOST, AND A CRUEL HOAX TO THOSE “PALE” PEOPLE SO TAUGHT.
    The Thawb (Arab Robes) Emblematic of Arab culture, is not Arab at all. The original Arabs, like the Egyptians, Berbers, Mesopotamian’s, Elamites/Persians: had Black skin, they did not need the Head to Toe protection from the Sun that the Thawb affords. It is not known who invented the Thawb.
    The original Turks were a very pale skinned Albino people who needed protection from the Sun, it is likely that they invented the Thawb.
    “The inhabitants of this part of Arabia nearly all belong to the race of Himyar. Their complexion is almost as black as the Abyssinians,”– Baron von Maltzan, ‘Geography of Southern Arabia’ (1872).
    “In Arabia the first inhabitants were probably a dark-skinned, shortish population intermediate, between the African Hamites and the Dravidians of India and forming a single African Asiatic belt with these.”– Handbook of the Territories which form the Theater of Operations of the Iraq Petroleum Company Limited and its Associated Companies.

    Who in the hell could possibly believe that Pale people could be native to a Hot land with burning Sunshine and a UV index guaranteed to fry all but the darkest people. It’s delusional, just delusional!
    THE TURKS TAKE CONTROL OF ARABIA:
    The Turks first started usurping the Arabs in 1038.
    Turk chief Toghril entered Baghdad in December 1055.
    The Turks took direct control of Arabia under Turkic Albanian Muhammad Ali, who send an expedition to Arabia: which between 1811 and 1813 expelled the Arab Wahhabis from the Hejaz. In a further campaign (1816-18), Ibrahim Pasha, the viceroy’s eldest son, defeated the Wahhabis Arabs in their homeland of Najd, and brought central Arabia under Albanian control.
    In 1820-21 Muhammad Ali sent an expedition up the Nile and conquered much of what is now the northern Sudan.
    Blacks in the Turkish ruled lands, have their identities stolen by the Turks, and their Mulattoes, after the break-up of the Ottoman Empire.
    As with the Berbers, Egyptians, etc. After the breakup of the Ottoman Empire after WWI, and the granting of independence to those countries after WWII, The Arabs saw their identity stolen by Whites (mainly Turks and their mulattoes) and other mixed race people.
    From early on, after Black Arabs were introduced to Albino Turks sometime in the early centuries of the modern era, the Arabs showed a distinct liking for Albino Turk Women. We do not know exactly when the two groups came to know each other, but Turkish Slave Soldiers (Mamluks) were an ever present presence in Arab Armies, and Albino Turkish Women; according to Orientalist paintings, were the mainstays of Arab harems.This of course explains the very high incidence
    of Mulattoes in North Africa and the Middle East.
    The Turks were the last of Asia’s Albinos to be chased out of Asia by the Mongols, but the impact of their Empires and politics has been great and enduring. Over the centuries they gradually took over greater parts of the Arab World, until they had all of it, and had made the Arabs their Vassals and irrelevant. Even today, those non-Black people calling themselves “ARABS” are really Turks who migrated to the far reaches of the Turkic Ottoman Empire in search of better prospects. After the breakup of the Empire, these Turks became the inheritors of power, continuing the disenfranchisement of local Blacks.
    The Turks & their Mulattos overthrew the Black Arabs and took over their religion in 1055 AD.
    Black Arabs lost control of their look land in 1055 AD when the Arab caliph al-Qa’im was removed by the Turkic Seljug chieftain Toghril Beg.

    JEWS:
    There is absolutely no real confusion or ambiguity about the race of the ancient Hebrews. That which does exist is the result of Albino lies and misinformation. Many Assyrian and other artifacts depict Hebrews as Black.
    In addition to the artifacts, there are written descriptions of the Black Hebrews.
    The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) had these thoughts on the origins and customs of the Hebrews.
    “Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place…”
    Khazar Background:
    Like other White Europeans, White Jews are of course Asian Albinos who were chased into the West by Mongols. The first Albinos (of unknown tribe) arrived in Europe circa 1,200 B.C. Their presence precipitated the European “Dark Ages” because of their disruption of the Black Greek and Etrurian civilizations. More of them came at the beginning of the Modern era, when the Mongols chased ALL remaining non-Mongol Albinos (Whites) out of Asia: except those in present-day Xinjiang, China.
    These Asian Albino tribes are known today as the Germanic’s, who settled in Western Europe. The Slavs who settled in Eastern Europe, and the Turks who were chased into Western Asia and Asia Minor, eventually taking and renaming Anatolia as their namesake “Turkey”.

    Khazar, a member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia. The Khazars
    adopt/ convert to the religion of Judaism in about 740 AD.
    After the destruction of their new kingdom in the West called Khazaria, the Turkic Khazars immersed themselves in their new religion of Judaism and their new identity as Jews. Thereby facilitating trade and commerce with both the Catholics/Christians and Islamist’s/Muslims who because of War, refused to trade with each other. This also allowed them to maintain themselves as a distinct people, as they scattered across Europe in search of commerce.
    In 2000, Israel records second highest skin cancer rate in the world.
    ” Israel’s Skin Cancer Rate Second Highest in the World
    The skin cancer rate in Israel is among the highest in the world, the Israel Cancer Association reported yesterday.
    Dr. Micha Barhana, director of the Health Ministry’s cancer registration unit, says the high rate of skin cancer in Israel is because of the large number of people from Europe and North America, whose fair skin is vulnerable to the desert climate here. Risk is increased by the dress fashions that allow more of the body and skin to be exposed to the sun .”- Haaretz.

    Supporting evidence:
    https://pin.it/246f2Bz
    https://pin.it/4rWyFch
    https://pin.it/3vGsd7M
    https://pin.it/4Y8a09P
    https://pin.it/1GBXPhn
    https://pin.it/6QC7IMa
    https://pin.it/a3V3uub
    https://pin.it/7e0oT6D
    https://pin.it/2aywSO1
    https://pin.it/2Mi8Az4
    https://pin.it/AnwilvB
    https://pin.it/12u0mto
    https://pin.it/5EDXW0a

    https://pin.it/5qB3Ncc
    https://pin.it/kJ5Q2x0

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading