Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Freundel Stuart was the prime minister of Barbados in the period 2010 to 2018 after assuming the caretaker role from David Thompson who became sick on the job soon after the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) was voted to office in 2008. The legacy of Stuart’s stewardship is still being written although some pundits at this early stage are happy to label it worse than the Sandiford administration. The tactic engineered by the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) – the other member of the duopoly – has enjoyed success with branding of the Glorious Years as The Lost Decade.

The failure of a third party movement to gain traction in Barbados means the health of our democracy is nexus to well managed DLP and BLP political parties. A strident dissenting voice is a feature of the Westminster system we try to model – the lacuna created by the recent general election and ensuing legal challenge regarding how the Senate is constituted is a case in point. A good argument can therefore be made that the business of political parties is the public’s business although classified private entities. In fact the unwillingness of quality citizens to offer themselves to join political parties who aspire to selflessly serve the public is at the heart of the type of governments we are saddled.

Some of us who comment on political matters are not surprised at the dysfunctional state of the DLP. It was not difficult to forecast. Barbadians except for the rabidly partisan are turned off by the quality of politics and governments we have been getting since the Tom Adams era which ended in the mid 80s. The blogmaster opines both DLP and BLP political parties have been rotated to govern the country based on the level of voter apathy and lack of credible alternatives and little to do with substance. The unprecedented 30-0 victories at the polls by the BLP in 2018 and 2022 should give Barbadians reason to pause. The BLP despite making several mistakes in a brief tenure of just over three years the political opposition was unable to gain the public’s trust.   The quality of our system of government whether we like it or not is tied to the quality of individuals attracted to serve in political parties. There is that symbiotic relationship only a fool would deny.

Today makes 32 days since the last general election and except for a public position in response to a contentious offer from Prime Minister Mottley to participate in a discussion about accepting two Senate seats, the DLP has been silent and irrelevant in the public space. Sensible observers appreciate it will take the DLP time to assess, reorganize and mobilize BUT there is a reality to be considered by the DLP and onlookers. The silence coming out of George Street is consistent with the ‘glorious years’ of the Stuart administration and the longer it persists, the more difficult it will be for that party to be perceived as a credible alternative. The blogmaster is aware the DLP has skin in the game based on the matter that is before the court brought by AG Brathwaite – who we know is acting de facto for the DLP. Some of us are not so stupid to believe otherwise.

This is a cry for a different type of citizen with a passion and body of work for serving the public to join the two main political parties. An organization assumes the character of its members. If we want our governments to change how business is done, it must begin with the quality of personnel attracted to political parties. Today it is the DLP in crisis, it is not inconceivable the BLP may find itself in a similar position when Mia Mottley demits office whether for a forced or unforced reason. If that happens all of us will be adversely impacted.

The type of government we get starts with YOU!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

366 responses to “Sound of Silence”


  1. Fringe party candidates lose deposits
    By Bryan Walker bryanwalker@nationnewscom
    Each of the 37 candidates from the five minor parties in the January 19 General Election, along with three from the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and 11 Independents, have lost their $250 deposit.
    Heading that list is former Opposition Leader Bishop Joseph Atherley, leader of the newly formed Alliance Party for Progress (APP), and his deputy Lynette Eastmond, who both failed to amass more than the required one-sixth (16.67 per cent) of the legal votes cast to get their money back.
    Of the $27 000 paid into the Treasury by the 108 candidates, $12 750 will remain in the Government’s coffers.
    The Electoral & Boundaries Commission (EBC) has finally released the official results from the poll which saw the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) securing a second consecutive 30-0 sweep of the seats in the House of Assembly.
    The overall voter turnout was lower than in previous elections as thousands of Barbadians were denied the opportunity to cast their ballot due to health protocols barring those in COVID-19 isolation from visiting polling centres.
    When contacted yesterday, EBC chairman, Queen’s Counsel Leslie Haynes, said they were still conducting a post-mortem on the poll, but he did confirm that any candidate falling below the one-sixth threshold would have to forfeit their $250 deposit.
    Atherley, who was part of the BLP “redwash” in May 2018 when he comfortably won the St Michael West constituency by securing 3 214 votes, before crossing the floor and becoming a one-man Opposition, switched to St Michael Central soon after this year’s election bell was rung.
    After forming the People’s Party for Democracy and Progress a year after his flip, he joined forces with the United Progressive Party (UPP) this year to create the APP, which had 20 candidates in the January 19 race.
    He was soundly beaten by the incumbent, Speaker of the House Arthur Holder, who polled 2 014 votes, with Atherley only managing 267 (less than ten per cent of the overall tally).
    Eastmond, second in command in the APP and a former UPP leader, fared no better in St Philip West, getting only 328 votes, a mere six per cent of the votes cast in that constituency.
    For the DLP, then leader Verla De Peiza, though beaten by incumbent Peter Phillips in St Lucy by just over 1 000 votes, secured more than enough to recover her five “Errol Barrow” notes ($50 bills), which candidates traditionally display when paying in their deposit on Nomination Day.
    However, three of her colleagues were not so fortunate, as Damien Griffith in St Michael North East (13 per cent), Ricardo Williams in St Michael West (14 per cent) and St Thomas candidate Dr Rolerick Hinds (16.5 per cent) all lost their money. This is the second straight election in which Hinds has had to forfeit his funds.
    In the City of Bridgetown, Kemar Stuart of the Dems was barely able to secure enough support to retrieve his deposit, tallying 17 per cent with his 459 votes.
    None of the candidates from Solutions Barbados, Barbados Free Party, New Barbados Kingdom Alliance and Barbados Sovereignty Party got anywhere near the marker for a return of their $250.
    From the overall results, the toughest battle was fought in St Philip North, where incumbent Dr Sonia Browne again defeated attorney Michael Lashley. While her winning margin was more than 1 500 votes in 2018, this time she crossed the line by 235 votes.

    Source: Nation


  2. DLP must change to stay relevant
    THE DEMOCRATIC LABOUR PARTY (DLP) has suffered two consecutive devastating defeats at the General Election in 2018 and 2022. This has relegated the party into the shadows of the political arena and has put tremendous strain on its organisational resources.
    The organisational structure that lies behind each political party is extremely important. After all, once elected to govern, it will become the foundation that manages the entire country. Both of our major political parties have complex structures that range from the national committee that oversees everything to an army of volunteers that make up the boots on the ground.
    In the world of business, a company that loses its appeal to customers will either be reorganised, or it will go under. The same applies to a political party, except that the consequences of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) going under will have a huge impact on democracy in Barbados. The complex structure required to create and maintain a political party makes it prohibitive for new parties to be established.
    This is borne out by the lack of success from numerous new parties that have been created over the years. It is therefore unlikely that a new party would be developed very easily to replace the void created from the loss of the DLP. “Change is difficult but not changing is fatal.” The DLP executive team should be conscious of the need for change. It will need the courage to make the changes necessary to disrupt the status quo that underlies the predicament of the party.
    It is highly unlikely that all the existing members of the executive team will be relevant for the future.
    Ironically, they are the ones that control the decisions that must now be made. Their legacy will be the creation of a new DLP that makes a difference to Barbadians in the future. In this case, access to external advice is essential to create a new approach and avoid being stuck in the past.
    There appears to be strong support for the DLP across the island.
    This, no doubt, reflects acknowledgement of the party’s major contribution to our national development over the years. It may also reflect the desire to retain an important “other half” to our twoparty political system.
    The end result is that the DLP is an important institution and we will all benefit from its resurgence.
    Long live the King.
    – CHRIS DE CAIRES

    Source: Nation


  3. An Opposition silence
    And this is why I sojourn here, Alone and palely loitering, Though the sedge is withered from the lake, And no birds sing.
    – JOHN KEATS, La belle dame sans merci
    WE ARE IN a period of which the Ancient Mariner was thinking. “Water water everywhere and not a drop to drink.” On the other hand our leaders might be compared to Sir Ralph the Rover as he paced the deck wondering where the blasted bell was situated.
    As the situations in the world change from day to day, to us major problems go through swings that impact on the living arrangements of citizens buttressed by COVID-19 and its demands – social and economic.
    As Parliament discusses our future economic direction there is no one to challenge the narrow direction that we must tread, imposed by our inability to borrow on a wide market. This is not an ideal situation. Even the most salubrious situation needs a questioning voice.
    One of the major problems that we have to solve is what to do about an Opposition. A young lady wrote to me and asked if I would like to take the job. I told her that my time had passed and that I was in an armchair watching the world go by and the planes come in. However, I would chance to say that the situation is like all are waiting for something to happen. The scenario that faced us in 2018 was easily solved by the Bishop crossing the floor. Now who will bell the cat situation? We take note now of the political future of the Bishop in the 2022 elections and nobody wants to chance the future of losing their political alliance. There is much at stake at not being politically elected – pension and prestige. The Bishop’s time was shortlived and now he is the leader of a party without votes and without a salary. None of the 30 want to be like that.
    But the absence of Opposition in Parliament is not the only and most important aspect of going forward. In order to legitimate proceedings there needs to be a solution to the impasse. This is a challenge to the plethora of legal talent with which the government is ostensibly blessed. The Leader of the Opposition is to be the chair of the Public Accounts Committee, a surveillance job of major importance. Sadly it seems not to have benefitted from this surveillance during the short past administration.
    Right now the one person
    that the public can count on to expose wrong or suspicious doings is the Auditor General, but his reports generally arrive after the “deed” is done. Previously no one seems to have paid attention to his reports and the fact that they would now be provided after the deed is done gives us even less confidence.
    So while we in our elation may be euphoric about the repeated 30-0, it has presented us with a conundrum that seems as difficult or as easy as Vladimir Putin taking over the Ukraine as the Ukraine government bemoans the insufficiency of help although provided with artillery of all sorts.
    Not satisfied with the uncertainty of the situation, our society has been set thinking with a declaration coming from a prominent source that what has been accepted by thousands of preachers throughout the ages is nothing but a fairy story that they had accepted imposed upon us. This intervention is profound. Like the 30-0, it hits at the foundation of ourexistence especially men having to sweat.
    Most of Genesis in the Bible is fiction he says. We were not made from a handful of sand; there was no snake misleading the woman – women would feel relieved; Adam was not naked in the Garden of Eden; neither was Eve. Maybe there was no Adam and Eve. This is another piece of earth-shattering news that threatens to change our way of life as we face a different future and a one-sided parliament.
    If we have no Opposition in Parliament, then there is need for those with voices to scrutinise what is set before us and be the alternate watchdog of citizens.
    Now, more than any other time some balance needs to be given to the direction, both politically and economically, in which our country is heading.
    Harry Russell is a banker. Email quijote70@gmail.com


    Source: Nation


  4. Govt did not have a moral mindset when calling the elections during a pandemic
    This is a result of all combined Mia said during her winning speech that govt can be a govt unto itself
    Noted govt seemingly having reached a comfort zone of having a Parliament without an opposition
    At this point the tea leaves being read and decisions and conclusions already made


  5. Anyone got a Zoom link for today’s charade in court?

  6. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ John

    Since when did our Court system became a live TV show?


  7. DavidFebruary 28, 2022 8:05 AM

    An Opposition silence

    .
    .
    .
    If we have no Opposition in Parliament, then there is need for those with voices to scrutinise what is set before us and be the alternate watchdog of citizens.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    We can’t have a constitutional parliament with no opposition!!


  8. ‘Premature move’
    NO CROSS- EXAMINATION OF AG, LAWYERS INSIST
    By Fernella Wedderburn
    The Attorney General’s legal team is fighting a move to have him cross-examined in court in the lawsuit challenging the makeup of Parliament on the basis of an incomplete Senate.
    The legal team has “strenuously” objected to the oral application made on Tuesday, charging that it is “premature”.
    The development arose when the civil case lodged by former Attorney General Adriel Brathwaite Q.C. continued during a virtual sitting of the High Court before Madam Justice Cecily Chase Q.C.
    Brathwaite is asking the court to quash President Dame Sandra Mason’s decision to reconvene Parliament. Since Parliament resumed last month, all but three of the 21 Senators have been appointed.
    The lawsuit was expected to continue on Tuesday in case management with attorneys on both sides putting forward their respective arguments on preliminary points of law on issues they wanted the court to deal with.
    That aspect of the case did not occur.
    Instead, Brathwaite’s attorneys Garth Patterson QC, Michelle Russell and Rico Yearwood revealed that their side had been served with an affidavit which they interpreted as a response to their previous application for disclosure.
    “The affidavit states that there are no documents in the possession of the President,” Patterson revealed, adding that “we are obliged to take them at face value”.
    Given those circumstances, he said, there was no useful purpose to be served in pursuing the application for disclosure and asked the court for leave to cross-examine on the affidavits.
    He said his team had been expecting that by the time the disclosure process was complete the Government would have “laid its cards on the table”, but that had not materialized.
    The “only remaining option,” he added, was to seek to elicit from the Government, by cross-examination, the information that they should have voluntarily disclosed in the interest of assisting the court in discharging its supervisory function.
    “If this court is to have any fair opportunity to critically assess the actions or omissions of the President in relation to the issues . . . in this case, there must be some substratum of fact on which the court is going to be operating.
    “If the Government, through the Attorney General, has elected not to put its cards on the table, to hold the cards close to its chest, then we are entitled to invite the court to give us an opportunity to pry a few of those cards loose.
    “Let’s be frank and blunt about this – the Government is not even willing to even agree to things that every blind person in Barbados is aware of. It doesn’t require any genius to understand why the three senators have not been appointed but the Government won’t even admit to that, that there are reasons and here are the reasons,” Patterson added.
    But the Attorney General’s legal team, consisting of Queen’s Counsel Leslie Haynes, Roger Forde Q.C., Alrick Scott Q.C. and Gregory Nicholls, objected to the application. Other lawyers representing the Government’s interest are Simone Scott from the Attorney General’s Chambers, with instructing attorneys from the chambers of Carrington & Sealy represented by Dr Adrian Cummins Q.C., Shericka Mohammed-Cumberbatch and Jason Wilkinson.
    Haynes charged that the issues of law which presented themselves in the matter “do not require the need for crossexamination”, adding that one of the issues related to the immunity clause or clauses of the President.
    “So, it is alright to come here and say I want to cross- examine the Attorney General on the affidavit, but if we do that without first determining what exactly is the immunity of the President . . . then we are going to have issues in the crossexamination.
    “If the authority . . . [being alluded] to as the President . . . then one must first enquire into the immunity clauses and . . . the extent to determine what cross-examination will or not be allowed.
    “Therefore . . . the application being made is premature. If [this court] were to proceed with this application now without determining the parameters of the immunity clauses, then when it comes to cross-examination the questions will be objected to at each stage,” Haynes submitted.
    Queen’s Counsel Forde, meantime, was adamant that Government could not be a part of the judicial review process.
    “. . . . The Cabinet can be a part of the judicial review but not the Government. So the subject of this judicial review is the President, it is not the Government. The decision-maker in this case is not the Attorney General . . . . He cannot speak to the decision-making processes of the President; he can’t,” Forde told the sitting in which it was revealed that the matter would likely end up before the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), Barbados’ highest court, whichever way the High Court rules.
    The Attorney General’s team will continue their submissions when the matter continues on Wednesday, following which Justice Chase will give her decision on the oral application for cross-examination.
    fernellawedderburn@barbadostoday.bb


  9. What does the AG have to hide and why does the AG does not want to give the naked truth


  10. Hard to understand why the AG would not want to be cross examined.
    After all, there are no laws in Barbados against politicians lying – even in the highest court.

    WTH!!!
    WHICH Angela cox is this…?
    Can we keep her David…. PLEASE..!!!


  11. Here is a govt that promised transparency and accountability to the people
    Now on one of the most important issues seeking clarity having to do with the Constitution he tries to distant himself
    The AG when becoming a minister of Govt made a sworn and recorded commitment to protect the integrity of the country
    Now presently asked to do.so in the court of law reneged openly
    Dam shame
    With clarity and purpose on his answer to the court yesterday the public of Barbados the people to whom he assured full transparency and accountability should issue.a vocal outburst for his resignation


  12. Looka here, we may not have laws against politicians lying but we have laws against torture and the notion of the AG testifying is torture for me as a matter of fact I am feeling some pain as I write this. Ah mean we have seen and heard the AG over these many years so have a heart please don’t put him on the stand, my poor ticker would give out.


  13. 🙂
    Looks as if this is getting more and more complicated.
    I lost track of where we are, next steps …


  14. “Let’s be frank and blunt about this – the Government is not even willing to even agree to things that every blind person in Barbados is aware of. It doesn’t require any genius to understand why the three senators have not been appointed but the Government won’t even admit to that, that there are reasons and here are the reasons,” Patterson added.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I am neither blind nor do I have to be a genius to have explained it clearly weeks ago!!

    It is simple squared … maybe even to the nth power with n >>>>>2..

    With no opposition there can be no parliament.

    I would venture to say that most if not all peeps on BU are also, neither blind but for sure, they are definitely not geniuses.

    Why is this taking so long?

    Why is the Country being held to ransom?


  15. I seem to recall that the judge indicated that a speedy trial was needed and then did nothing…


  16. Haynes charged that the issues of law which presented themselves in the matter “do not require the need for cross examination”, adding that one of the issues related to the immunity clause or clauses of the President.
    “So, it is alright to come here and say I want to cross- examine the Attorney General on the affidavit, but if we do that without first determining what exactly is the immunity of the President . . . then we are going to have issues in the cross examination.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Here is the solution to the problem.

    The GG needs to resign in shame and everything “parliament” did subsequent to 2018 made null, void and of no effect.

    HRH needs to appoint a new GG.

    That’s why immunity is so important to the “President”!!

    At a time in 2018 when she well knew that there were 29 members of the cabinet because she had sworn them in, one member of the House appeared before her claiming he had been appointed by the group in the House which sat in opposition to the Government.

    This is not some layperson holding office, this is a former Justice of the Court of Appeal.

    She exercised her judgment and unilaterally appointed Joe Atherly Leader of the opposition when as is plainly put in court.

    “Let’s be frank and blunt about this – the Government is not even willing to even agree to things that every blind person in Barbados is aware of. It doesn’t require any genius to understand why the three senators have not been appointed but the Government won’t even admit to that, that there are reasons and here are the reasons,” Patterson added.


  17. The serpent exposed the GG in 2018 and that exposure may well lead to the destruction of the BLP.

    A true wolf in sheep’s clothing.


  18. So immunity is a big thing!!

  19. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, a whole lotta legalese foolishness. But AC does take the cake tho as the Bushman suggests… when a political weather-cock like this BU rooster could suggest that a politician lying in a court of law is OK thereby signaling that s/he and dem peeps had no issues doing the same thing in years past we should be “shocked”. Or NOT!

    But anyhow, one would simply have to agree with the gov’t team’s objection based on their point about the President’s immunity. Our constitution doc does say quite explicitly words to effect that any decisions made by the President pertaining to appointments and such CANNOT be enquired into (by a court of law or otherwise). It is by her discretion not so.

    Maybe they are being a bit lawyerly to determine that such would also extend to all preliminary info presented to the President by the AG et al … but even that seems a fair point.

    Patterson has to thrust from another angle to get his discovery it appears.

    But yet still all a bunch of foolishness as we should NEVER have been here in the first place!

    I gone.


  20. 5) Where the Governor-General is directed to exercise any function in accordance with the recommendation or advice of,
    or with the concurrence of, or after consultation with, any person or authority, the question whether he has so exercised that function shall not be enquired into in any court.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Therein lies the sting and the immunity from prosecution!!

    In the appointment of the Leader of the opposition she acts alone and exercises her judgment.

  21. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    “We can’t have a constitutional parliament with no opposition!!”
    xxxxxx
    I suspect this basic “opinion” is what guides all your other many comments.
    While the constitution makes allowance for an opposition, it does not say there HAS to be one.
    Likely because it is rare not to have an opposition, we have come to “believe” there must be one?
    Meanwhile, it makes allowance for where there is not one, by granting powers to the President to act, where ‘missing’ persons from the Opposition would normally do so.


  22. If the GG resigns in shame as she should, the whole House of Cards known as the House of Assembly falls.


  23. A wolf in sheep’s clothing!!


  24. NorthernObserverMarch 2, 2022 10:23 AM

    “We can’t have a constitutional parliament with no opposition!!”
    xxxxxx
    I suspect this basic “opinion” is what guides all your other many comments.
    While the constitution makes allowance for an opposition, it does not say there HAS to be one.
    Likely because it is rare not to have an opposition, we have come to “believe” there must be one?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    There can be no parliamentary democracy without an opposition.

    The constitution unambiguously states that there SHALL be a Leader of the opposition.

    It also describes unambiguously how he SHALL be selected and then appointed by the GG.

    Its in plain black and white.


  25. The judge didn’t do nothing. The intervening period was used for both side to file affidavits in the matter. The judge also advised that her court clerk contracted covid.


  26. @Dee Word

    The blogmaster does not take to heart comments made by some on the blog. This is important to maintain one’s sanity.


  27. @ Sargeant
    “Looka here, we may not have laws against politicians lying but we have laws against torture and the notion of the AG testifying is torture for me…”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    LOL … ha ha ha. ,,,MURDAH!!!!
    Muh belly….

    SWEET!!!


  28. de pedantic DribblerMarch 2, 2022 10:19 AM

    @David, a whole lotta legalese foolishness. But AC does take the cake tho as the Bushman suggests… when a political weather-cock like this BU rooster could suggest that a politician lying in a court of law is OK thereby signaling that s/he and dem peeps had no issues doing the same thing in years past we should be “shocked”. Or NOT!
    Xxxxxc
    Dribbler
    Where in any of my comments on this issue did I suggest or infer that lying by any govt officials is OK


  29. Haynes: It’s jumping the gun

    Application premature, says lead Govt attorney
    by HEATHER-LYNN EVANSON
    heatherlynevanson@nationnews.com
    THE SENIOR COUNSEL challenging the constitutionality of Parliament wants the Attorney General to take the witness stand so he can be crossexamined and the actions of President the Most Honourable Dame Sandra Mason can be scrutinised.
    However, the lead attorney for Government’s legal team argued the application was premature and that there were ouster clauses preventing such examination from taking place.
    The parties were back before Justice Cicely Chase, via Zoom, when the constitutional motion challenging the validity of Parliament continued yesterday.
    Application
    The motion, brought by former Attorney General Adriel Brathwaite, is alleging that the Senate, with only 18 senators, was not properly constituted and, therefore by extension, neither was Parliament.
    The application for judicial review claims that any business conducted by Parliament on or after February 4 this year, “including any law purportedly enacted by it, is invalid, null and void”.
    Brathwaite, through his attorneys Queen’s Counsel Garth Patterson, Michelle Russell and Rico Yearwood, is submitting that a failure by President The Most Honourable Dame Sandra Mason to appoint two opposition senators amounts “to the wrongful abdication of her constitutional duty to proceed under Section 36 of the Constitution to the appointment of all the senators as soon as may be practicable after every General Election”.
    Queen’s Counsel Leslie Haynes is leading Government’s team of ten lawyers, which includes fellow Queen’s Counsel Roger Forde and Alrick Scott, as well as Gregory Nicholls, representatives from the Solicitor General’s Chambers and attorneys from the legal firm Carrington and Sealy.
    Yesterday’s hearing had been set to deal with preliminary legal issues, but the arguments turned to whether the Attorney General, as the representative of the President in the matter, could be cross-examined, after Patterson indicated he wanted to question Attorney General Dale Marshall based on his affidavits.
    However, Haynes, who objected to the application, said the issues of law did not require a need for crossexamination.
    “Furthermore, I think that one of the issues relates to what I would term the immunity clause relating to the President and the duties of the President, or alternatively one may interpret them as ouster clauses, if there are not immunity clauses,” Haynes argued.
    “In neither case we say would it allow the court to inquire into the exercise of the President in the performance of her duties. So that wherever the application to cross-examine the Attorney General ends up or whatever the court determines, the court will first have to determine the extent to which the cross-examination of the President will be allowed.
    Cross-examine
    “So that it is all right to come and say I want to cross-examine the Attorney General on the affidavit, but if we do that without first determining what exactly is the immunity of the President, then we are going to have issues in the cross-examination. So therefore we must first deal with the ouster clause to set the parameters,” he said, as he stressed the application was premature.
    Patterson, in response, said the immunity that was being claimed related to the President.
    “It is personal to the President. It doesn’t apply to other Government
    officials. The Attorney General is not the President. The immunities that extend to the President cannot extend to the Attorney General,” he argued.
    “The Attorney General is, by the Constitution, the legal advisor to the [state]. It is in his name that actions are brought. He must represent the position of the Government and to the extent that this action requires him to respond, and he has, he has filed affidavits, he can’t have it both ways. He can’t file affidavits and then say ‘I am not subject to crossexamination because I am immune’,” Patterson submitted.
    The senior attorney also argued that Marshall’s affidavit suffered from a “paucity of fact” and left anyone who read it “in a state of doubt as to what the true position is”.
    “It contains the type of non-admissions and denials that you would see typically in a defence, but it is not giving full and fair explanation of all the facts and reason, which is what the standard is,” he noted.
    When the matter resumes today, Roger Forde will respond to Patterson’s arguments.

    Source: Nation


  30. @ NO
    John refuses to accept that in the HOA there is NO POLITICAL ANIMAL called an ‘opposition member’ until so appointed’ … only 30 parliamentarians…
    Whoever commands a majority is then APPOINTED as government, ….and WHOSOEVER can scrape a minority is the ‘Opposition’.
    Matter DONE – just like any high school debating club. (and about as useful).
    Steupsss…
    Political parties shall be the DEATH of us Bajan BBs.

  31. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    So now you change “constitutional parliament” to “parliamentary democracy”.
    Shall does not equal MUST.
    The democracy is the free and fair election of 30 persons.
    So done.
    Which side they opt to sit on, is their choice. The Constitution does not dictate which side a duly elected person must line up on.

  32. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @BT
    Bajans are no different to BB in most other nations.
    Party loyalty causes similar issues elsewhere.


  33. IT WAS REPORTED ON BRASSTACKS.

    Water main burst and making road impassable at Berlin road, Woodbourne, st. Phillip.


  34. @ David March 2, 2022 10:49 AM

    It seems that (y)our man GP No.3 is a real top dog lawyer.
    At least he is bringing some class to the’ quality’ of jurisprudence in Bimshire.

    Do you know if the current AG, recently appointed under Constitution of the New Republic of Barbados, still fancies himself as a “Queen’s Counsel” (QC)?


  35. Taken from Fb
    Here is Ezra Alleyne response to the motion files in the high Court
    Here he spins a reasonable aspect of Attorney client privilege
    However the AG is also accountable to the people of Barbados
    Xx
    Xxxx

    The Attorney General IS by tradition the Legal Adviser to the Government to His Honour the Speaker AND ALSO to the Head of State..

    .I wrote said this way back in 2002….No one listened then.

    Now but suddenly the key role of an AG is brought to the fore….Why else is any lawyer appointed AG made a Q C right away!

    The Head of STATE in the UK traditionally chose the A G …as one of the Kings chosen Counsel the post nominals attached as night followed day. We followed the pattern

    Is it his role as Adviser to the Head of State that has triggered this application? , I suspect it is!

    Given that the AG has filed an Affidavit…..Do they wish to know and test what was said and to whom in those interactions between the AG and those whom he advises?

    Interesting aspect of client attorney privilege on show? Who knows? I shall tune in if I can…Our democracy and the Rule of Law on display! Gripping!!


  36. Here is the problem with Ezra’s logic but it depends on who signed the AG’s Affidavit.

    If it is Dale Marshall, then it was because he was appointed and sworn in by the GG.

    Here is his problem and why he would not want to be cross examined!!

    Dale Marshall may very well turn out to be a PLAY PLAY AG!!

    If he is the one who swore the affidavit as Attorney General, it may well turn out to be a fraud practiced on the Court.

    Of course he would not want to be cross examined.

    The further this goes on the more people at the top will be exposed.

    They need to walk and stop disputing the rules.

    Even the Judge is compromised.


  37. So who is Her Royal Highness going to appoint as the new GG?

    I would offer my services and would consider it my patriotic duty to do the job for $1 a year for 2 years.

    Notice I have not said whether it is $1 BDS or $1 USD!!

    After 2 years I would collect 1+1 = 2 … or 4 dollars in which case 1+1 can be 4.


  38. @ John March 2, 2022 1:16 PM
    “So who is Her Royal Highness going to appoint as the new GG?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Why don’t you Sir Johnny, get real and stop acting the part of a RIP van Winkle?

    Do you really think that either the British government or its Royal Family wants anything more to do (governance wise) with its former cash cow now emaciated and under the care of a Vet called IMF?

    Not even the ambitious Prince Willy wants to put the old former gem in the English crown on his Caribbean itinerary to celebrate his granny’s upcoming jubilee.

    Furthermore, any hopes of getting some monetary reparations through some form of grant-funding have been dashed with the recent ‘RoB’ thingy.

    Why ask mummy for pocket money when you are now all grown-up adults living in your own ‘rented’ house?


  39. Oh lawd, they gun kill muh.

    Isn’t monkey a Bajan delicacy/staple??


  40. (Quote):
    Isn’t monkey a Bajan delicacy/staple??
    (Unquote).
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Maybe our resident ‘Twistorian’ on all things Bajan, Master John Knox, can tell us the true story behind the widespread presence of the West African ‘green’ monkey just as he is so well informed about their ‘human’ counterparts.

    What role, Sir John, did the Quakers play in the arrival of the green monkeys to the shores of Barbadoes and their subsequent propagation right across the ‘non-indigenous’ island and Lesser Antilles like St. Kitts?


  41. @Miller

    Do you mean George Payne?

    #askingforfriends


  42. MillerMarch 2, 2022 3:27 PM

    (Quote):
    Isn’t monkey a Bajan delicacy/staple??
    (Unquote).
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Maybe our resident ‘Twistorian’ on all things Bajan, Master John Knox, can tell us the true story behind the widespread presence of the West African ‘green’ monkey just as he is so well informed about their ‘human’ counterparts.

    What role, Sir John, did the Quakers play in the arrival of the green monkeys to the shores of Barbadoes and their subsequent propagation right across the ‘non-indigenous’ island and Lesser Antilles like St. Kitts?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    When I was a boy, the Vincentians coming to cut canes used to eat monkey but I never got the impression back then that Bajans would eat Monkey.

    When I went to St. Vincent, many years later, my friends complained to me that wicked Bajan fishermen had introduced monkeys to St. Vincent.

    I don’t know how they got to the West Indies, maybe floated across the Atlantic on trees… ..GIS believes they were here 400 years ago which would mean they were here before settlement, … from the mouth of the Chief Agricultural Officer, broadcast on Brasstacks last year..

    https://gisbarbados.gov.bb/blog/three-reasons-for-explosion-of-monkey-population/


  43. Judge says she is not inclined yet to rule on whether the AG should be cross examined or not
    Xx
    Not unexpectedly since this Judge previously has shown herself to be a Judge of limited intellectual when hard and pressing issues are presented before her
    Her now infamous ruling in respect to voters Constitutional rights rendered a ruling stating that there was no election court whereby she could make a ruling
    Hence thousands of voters were disenfranchise without knowing why and if what the PM did was lawfully right in light of a guaranteed Constitutional right
    Now on another matter of high importance which hinges on the construction of the law of the Constitution the Judge boobs and weaves without inclination to give a high preference of ruling
    Kangaroos court or political court u decide


  44. Wickham: Raise deposit to $2 500
    Belle, Eastmond oppose any increase
    by TRE GREAVES
    tregreaves@nationnews.com
    THE FEE TO REGISTER as a political candidate should be increased by ten times, says Caribbean Development Research Services (CADRES) director Peter Wickham.
    However, his view that the $250 deposit is no longer enough to deter flippant candidates did not find favour with political scientist Dr George Belle or Deputy Leader of the Alliance Party for Progress (APP), Lynette Eastmond, who argued that individuals should not be priced out of running.
    “The challenge now is that $250 is not a deterrent. That is now less than the minimum weekly wage. It is not current and it should be revised,” Wickham said.
    “The sheer volume of candidates that are coming forward are not saving their deposits and the fact that the Electoral Office has indicated that the majority of people who put their deposits down never go back for it . . . proves that it is not a deterrent.
    “It was the same since the 1950s and I think it should be increased, consistent with the cost of living to a point where it is a deterrent.
    I think if it were $2 500, that would be a reasonable deterrent to ensure that people who run have a likelihood of success which is consistent with the original intent.”
    Need for reform
    The political scientist and radio talk show host was responding to a series of questions from the DAILY NATION related to the electoral process in Barbados, including the need for reform, voting procedures, term limits and the pricing structure.
    All candidates must pay a $250 deposit, which is lost if they do not receive at least one-sixth of the total votes cast in the constituency.
    However, Eastmond, a former Barbados Labour Party Cabinet minister who unsuccessfully contested the St Philip West seat during the 2022 General Election, said that kind of change was a step backwards.
    “It was never intended to be a money earner for the Government. The $250 is about keeping every Barbadian in. It is interesting that some people seem to be offended that ordinary Barbadians can run. In most countries all kinds of people run. You may not hear about them because they don’t make the news.
    “If you are going to try to increase that fee to stop people from being a candidate, you are starting to go back to the position where you had to own property in Barbados or be of a certain standing to vote. That is where you are going,” Eastmond said.
    Similarly, Belle said increasing the fee was not necessary and he said such a prohibitive move was not necessary.
    Markers
    “There was a time when those kinds of markers were used to stop people from voting. I don’t think you should be going down
    a line to say something is there to be so prohibitive in your ability to pay.
    “It’s sufficient of an embarrassment to those who go forward that they can’t get enough support to save their deposits.” Although Belle reasoned that fees were implemented to reduce the number of “nuisance” candidates, he said he did not believe the recent General Election showed there were any.
    “The reason why something like that is introduced is to dissuade people who think ‘an election was just called and I will run’, but I don’t think it should be such that it will make people not be able to afford to run again. We had a lot of third parties and some independents but I don’t think it was to the level of being a nuisance,” Belle added.


    Source: Nation


  45. @ John March 3, 2022 2:38 AM
    (Quote):
    I don’t know how they got to the West Indies, maybe floated across the Atlantic on trees… ..GIS believes they were here 400 years ago which would mean they were here before settlement, … from the mouth of the Chief Agricultural Officer, broadcast on Brasstacks last year..
    (Unquote).
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    So why not listen to the ‘real’ story behind the arrival of the green monkey to the Lesser Antilles.

    Just like how the pig and cow were brought to feed the white settlers so too was that source of bush meat for the slaves to eat as their culinary delight.

    What do you think was part of the meals fed to the slaves imprisoned like sardines on those floating wooden coffins? Caviar or strawberries?

    Or are you of the view that the green monkey is a cross between an agouti and a chimpanzee domesticated by the slaves?


  46. I’ve read of the Breadfruit being brought to feed the population but the slaves would not eat it.

    Cattle and oxen were brought to turn mills, draw carts and produce milk.

    Surely you have heard of Cattle mills.

    Hogs were present long before settlement introduced supposedly by the Portuguese.

    Because of its location, Barbados served as a revictualling station.

    Monkeys could have come across to Brazil from Africa and made their way across the northern coast of the South American Continent before crossing to Barbados in the early Arawak and Carib canoes.

    Remember, it is claimed that Africans crossed the Atlantic and appeared in Central America long before Columbus.

    Monkeys could have come with them.

    Really, the only way to discover if they were in Barbados before or after settlement is to use documentary evidence and research if they were found here by the first settlers.

    That of course does not eliminate the Portuguese.

    If they brought hogs, they may also have brought monkeys.

    Try this link if you are so interested.

    .https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305043478_History_of_green_monkeys_in_the_West_Indies_Part_I_Migration_from_Africa


  47. They should be thanking the previous govt

    Read ePaper
    Home / Focus / Local entertainers pleased to be performing at Resort

    Local entertainers pleased to be performing at Resort – by Barbados Today March 4, 2022
    Local entertainers have praised Sandals Barbados for the company’s efforts to keep them employed during the COVID pandemic, and for honouring the company’s mandate of hiring local talent to entertain their valued guests.

    During the two-year lockdown with restrictions on crowds at events, many entertainers were finding it difficult to stay afloat as the entertainment industry crashed. However, according to some, it was Sandals that helped ensure they were earning revenue.

    Well known and respected performer Khiomal Nurse said that it was through the opportunities provided by the hotel that he was able to do what he loves and even garner employment for other local artistes in the process.

    “When COVID hit Barbados initially with all the shutdowns and so on, we honestly didn’t know when we would be able to perform again as all of our bookings were cancelled and there was no real timeline for a return. Sandals reopened and I was contacted to secure entertainment services nightly, following of course the hotel’s Platinum Protocols of cleanliness and safety and most importantly the laws of Barbados. It was a pleasure to once again perform in front of people and get the good vibes I feel on stage,” said Nurse.

    Sharing his sentiments was fellow entertainer Natasha Crichlow who was also a former Sandals Manager in the opening years.

    Natasha Crichlow
    “Sandals’ means so much to me more than just being an entertainer. They provided opportunities and great experiences. I learnt so much being a manager there in terms of how things are done. Sandals means stability. The brand is known across the world and has been able to provide for me and my family since 2012.”

    Crichlow recalled how Sandals was the last to close during the pandemic and the first to re-open and declared that she loves working for the company. She also commended Nurse for looking out for his fellow entertainers.

    “I love the fact that Khiomal is able to provide for not only me but a number of us in entertainment. They (Sandals) are one of my biggest contracts (twice a week) and it’s easy for me because I have met and interacted with most of the staff. I can’t wait until we can return to the live bands but for now I am grateful.

    Some of the local artistes who perform at the Luxury Included ® Resort are: Nikita, Betty B, Shernelle Bovell, Natasha Cupid, Breaking Point, Rite Side of Red, Dale Husbands, Euphony, Russell Padmore, Bajanism and Fuhnominon.

    Resort Manager Patrick Drake lauded the entertainers for their quality performances and said that it was a hit among the guests.

    “We at Sandals pride ourselves on providing the best for our guests and team members, so when it comes to entertainment this was no exception. I believe we have the best Barbados has to offer on board and the variety of genres is amazing. The reviews we get from guests and seen posted on social media is testament that Barbadian talent is in demand and exceptional,” Drake said. (PR)


  48. @ John March 3, 2022 9:00 AM
    (Quote):
    Monkeys could have come across to Brazil from Africa and made their way across the northern coast of the South American Continent before crossing to Barbados in the early Arawak and Carib canoes.
    Remember, it is claimed that Africans crossed the Atlantic and appeared in Central America long before Columbus.
    Monkeys could have come with them.
    Really, the only way to discover if they were in Barbados before or after settlement is to use documentary evidence and research if they were found here by the first settlers.
    That of course does not eliminate the Portuguese.
    (Unquote).
    +++++++++++++++++++++

    Sometimes you take on the poorly played role of the fool.

    We know sugar was brought to Barbadoes by the Jewish Portuguese from Brazil. But to put that green monkey on your back and swim like Millie to Barbadoes in reverse is really taking the piss of a joke too far.

    How could you have read the same article you referenced as objective evidence about the arrival of the green monkey to the Lesser Antilles and still make a mockery of an intellectual monkey of yourself?

    Of course the West African monkeys came on the same ships as the black slaves; but not as pets or companions like your Irish dogs or even Welsh black belly sheep or ‘English’ white pussycats.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading