← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Barbados Underground posted a view on May 22 in the blog Is Guy Hewitt the Way, Truth and Light for the DLP. On June 2 the goodly Reverend Guy Hewitt in a turnabout from a couple weeks earlier declared his interest to challenge Verla De Peiza for the presidency of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP).

This is an interesting development for many reasons. At the top of the list – two years from a constitutionally due general election the DLP should have its slate of candidates available to the public to take advantage of the little time available to sell an alternative message. Ardent political supporters will vote for the colours. What about members of the electorate who want to be given the opportunity to process what the DLP candidates have to offer? We have allowed our political parties to take the vote from citizens for granted.

We will not agree on every issue. But let us respect those differences and respect one another. Let us recognize that we do not serve an ideology or a political party; we serve the people.

John Lynch

The DLP is led by Verla De Peiza, a lawyer who has managed to retain the leadership of the DLP for 3 years at a difficult time. According to political talking heads Peter Wickham and George Belle, Hewitt does not have a ghost of a chance of winning and by presenting himself at this eleventh hour, he is essentially making himself a nuisance to the process at a time the party should be advancing its preparation for the 2023 general election. That said, the process to elect the president of the DLP is democratic and unless the Reverend withdraws before the vote, it presents another interesting development on the political landscape of Barbados.

The blogmaster has followed Guy Hewitt’s journey from the early 2000s when he was a junior priest at Christ Church Anglican Church- never one to mince words he has always articulated his messages with panache and of late his social and political missives have infused the political mill with fodder worthy of commentary. 

The Reverend throwing his hat in the ring raises a couple of imponderables. Will the DLP apparatus seriously elect a political neophyte to lead the party at this juncture of its resurrection post 2018? How would electing a priest as President of the party be perceived by the electorate? There is the perception ‘politics’ is a blood sport. Reverend Guy Hewitt is a man whose primary role as a priest some will argue diametrically conflicts with that of a politician. 

The local landscape is crying out for a new kind of politics. Political apathy in the general population continues to rise especially in the youth segment. The upside for the DLP is that challenger Reverend Hewitt brings an effusive personality to the political equation in stark contrast to the incumbent. Is it the difference maker that will get him elected? At the bare minimum it may be infectious.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

116 responses to “Is Guy the Guy?”


  1. @angela coxJune 6, 2021 8:54 AM

    Hewitt enjoyed white luxury to the fullest as ambassador to London. He may look like an indigenous inhabitant of the island, but he is clearly in the service of our white upper class.


  2. TronJune 6, 2021 9:58 AM

    @angela coxJune 6, 2021 8:54 AM

    Hewitt enjoyed white luxury to the fullest as ambassador to London. He may look like an indigenous inhabitant of the island, but he is clearly in the service of our white upper class.

    Xxxxxxxxxx

    Tron
    Did Mia find a plane which can carry Gline Clarke to Canada to take up his prestigious job as an ambassador
    Answer that


  3. The diversion is on. The spinners are on.

    The search for an EWB, Tom or even a Mia is on. Can you remind me of how we got here?

    We have to move beyond personality politics. Swapping out Mia the solution. We see that with a 30-0 keeping her is not a solution.


  4. Based on what I’ve read, I do not agree with the arguments that are being presented on the issue because of the ‘bobbing and weaving’ or manipulation of information to prove a point. It is dishonesty.

    Ironically, we’ve had arguments on BU between the so called ‘stay at home and overseas Bajans,’ in which the former has been suggesting they have a better and unique understanding of issues confronting the Barbadian society, more so than the latter.

    This is usually countered by the latter’ ‘saying’ they get their information from sources such as overseas editions of our local newspapers, the internet, social media platforms, friends and relatives who remained in Barbados.

    I believe ‘stay at home Bajans’ could use similar sources to avail themselves of information relative to issues occurring in countries where their overseas counterparts reside.

    To suggest a detachment of the year or perceived year of the ‘Windrush scandal,’ would have to made so as to provide clearer understanding of what occurred, seems to be suggesting the situation is better understood by those people living in the UK and is perhaps questioning our ability ti understand such matters, as well as a snide condemnation of our sources of information.

    In other words, the sources of information, whether it is Google, relatives or friends, interchangeably become accurate and credible…… or inaccurate and untrustworthy, depending upon who is using them.

    Therefore, it’s ‘best to agree to disagree’ and move on.


  5. I like how we are able to drag various topics into the discussion and ignore pressing problems.

    Our ADHD may be a benefit in disguise. Faced with numerous problems and a crumbling world, we are still able to take a gentle stroll through the park.


  6. Our problems are known. Some solutions are known.

    Lacking leadership, will and courage to make changes will keep us failing.

    I am not convince that swapping out Mia with Guy is the solution. When you change a bulb in a searchlight, you know what will be the outcome when you switch it on. I also have doubts that keeping Mia is the solution.

    But we are a people of words are not of actions. Also, I doubt if Lil Ric singing christian songs is the solution.


  7. The same voices
    The same attacks are being levelled at Verla from the same operatives
    A strategy designed to destroy the image of dlp leadership or any potential candidate
    Hewitt is yet to lay out any policy but the Gangsta force of blp
    political executioners laying in wait couldn’t wait to shoot
    Why does it matter to the blp Gangsta executioners if Hewitt role in Windrush
    was not significant to be even bringing the issue to fort


  8. I’ll always maintain my view that BU is an amazing forum. ‘Yuh just can’t win wid some people.’

    To question the reasons behind someone making a specific comment, means you’re not giving credit to Guy Hewitt for the role he played in the ‘Windrush affair.’

    If a contributor makes an unreasonable criticism of Mottley that may not be necessarily true and someone gives an alternative perspective, they are accused of being a ‘BLP operative’ or ‘an apologist.’

    Neutrality means ’embracing’ criticisms of all politicians, whether they are questionable or not, while throwing being ‘fair and balanced through the window.’

    It seems as though we some of us can never engage in discussions based on facts, while being reasonable and rational at the same, without politicising and confining our arguments into a BLP versus DLP scenario.

    Perhaps now is the appropriate time for Artaxerxes to retire his keyboard. I’m sure it would be a decision welcomed by many.


  9. Nah. You are quite good.


  10. Reminds me of an argument I heard yesterday about the word ‘foreigner.’

    One guy said ‘foreigner’ could be defined as someone who is an outsider, they do not belong to particular place, community or group. So, a guy coming from St. Vincent is a foreign national in Barbados.

    Another guy said he was wrong because, according to what he heard on the radio, the word means someone who is from England or America.

    He was told the dictionary does provide not that definition, to which he responded the dictionary is wrong because it was written by man and he preferred to accept what he heard on the radio. And, if a Vincentian is a foreigner, then, the West Indies cricket team would be a foreign team.

    The same guy was involved in an argument about ‘Orange Hill’ in St. Vincent. He told the crowd there isn’t any district in SVG known as ‘Orange Hill.’ When someone attempted to explain where it is located and could be found on the map, he said the map was wrong.


  11. To be quite honest, though I find Guy to be a personable fellow I have a problem with his abrupt change of position re challenging Verla for the leadership role.

    I also have discomfort with religious leaders in political roles. Having said that, Anglican priests of the younger variety are not dogmatic or intolerant of different views and do not seek to control people. They are more likely than most to be able to divorce religion from politics.

    I have in my mind a newspaper image of Guy in which he was discussing the Windrush situation before it was resolved.

    Long time since I see a man looking so vex! Not the face of a diplomat!

    Not sure if it is the face of the politician we need but we shall see what happens. Not my choice to make – yet.


  12. Go ask the former Deputy HC bout Hewitt’s role in Windrush. I watched her spill some ah de tea in the Senate.🤣🤣

  13. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ et al
    All this Hewitt talk seems like a rush of wind to me.
    In the mean time: Attempts to destroy the NUPW and $24 million destined for poor Black people cannot be seriously accounted for according to the Auditor General.
    Are we passing wind or air ? The question here must be , what smells stinker the rush of wind or the air from the Auditor General’s report and efforts to destroy the NUPW.


  14. @William

    Is there a reason we cannot discuss all the above?


  15. @ Mr. Skinner

    Isn’t this thread about Guy Hewitt?

    Isn’t there a thread dedicated to the Auditor General’s report, where the issues you raised could be or should be discussed?

    Surely you can’t be serious?

  16. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Artax @ David
    Sincere apologies to you both. Carry on smartly.


  17. Anyone in the UK at the time knows the impact that Guy Hewitt involvement had on the Windrush affair.

    Was his the most important voice? No. Was it the first? No.

    But the impact of his involvement was obvious to see at the time. Or should be for any one who would take the time now to do a bit of research.


  18. Does it matter if his role materially impacted the outcome? What matters is that he stood up and represented the cause. Something that many many more of us must do if we are to improve the qualify of life.


  19. Does it matter if his role materially impacted the outcome? What matters is that he stood up and represented the cause.
    xxxxxxxxxxx

    Are you trolling your own blog?

    Of course it matters.

    Or do you prefer for people to “stand up and represent the cause.” just because they have nothing better to do?


  20. @Dullard

    This will go over your head but representing the/a cause, having the courage of your convictions is all that is required as the necessary first step to making a difference.


  21. @Blogmaster

    Word salad. Hand the phone to an adult.


  22. You may have the last word. Time is too precious. You should retreat to Barbados Free Press.


  23. Lol @ Young David

    Am I not in the right place?


  24. Wolf in sheep’s clothing (Part 1)

    A NUMBER OF PERSONS contacted me wondering whether I was going to speak to the outrageous Trojan Riddim video. Although I share the indignation that the nation feels about this vulgar display of deviance and immorality, I was curious about the timing of the eruption of rage as I was aware that this video has been in circulation for some time.
    Having lived under the Donald Trump presidency, I understand the art of distraction that formed the core of his political strategy. Whether Trump was routinely threatening to shut down the government or bomb Iran or close the southern border or commence a trade war with China, these were all distractions. But Trump wasn’t just trying to distract, as his intent was misdirection and certain media houses were complicit.
    Misdirection has nothing to do with distraction and everything to do with controlling people’s attention. Consider a magician’s sleight-of-hand card trick. Often an audience member selects a card, memorises it and returns it to the deck. After shuffling the deck, the magician, through some elaborate process, reveals the correct card.
    While magicians don’t reveal secrets, they often admit the trick is only possible by creating a distraction that keeps the audience’s focus exactly where it is needed and away from the actions the magician didn’t want them to notice.
    While Barbados was deservedly rebuking the artistes involved in the music video seemingly endorsing gun violence, we were misdirected from two important occurrences: the 2020 Auditor General’s Report to Parliament posted on May 25 and the serious concerns raised by the Barbados Bar Association about the planned Anti-Corruption and Anti-Terrorism Agency (ACATA) Bill.
    Anomalies raised
    Without going deeply into the Auditor General’s Report, especially as it is available online via the Barbados Parliament website, I want to highlight a few anomalies raised, which all Barbadians should be concerned about: 1.13 “The audit of the National Insurance Fund is substantially in arrears, and during the year, although some work was conducted, not much progress was made.”
    How much money is left in the National Insurance Scheme is a guestimate.
    2.10 Although “the Accountant General [is] to . . . submit to the Auditor General . . . financial statements . . . within four months after the close of each financial year . . . the Financial Statements were, however, issued . . . a year after the regulatory deadline and approximately 15 months after the close of the relevant financial year.
    This situation is unacceptable and needs to be urgently addressed”.
    2.14 “As at the end of the financial year 2018-2019, Government has yet to publish any consolidated [financial] statements. The absence of consolidated statements presents challenges, as the total debts and liabilities of the Government are not being accounted for . . . .”
    Another guestimate
    What we owe and to whom is another guestimate.
    2.15 “There was a total of $209.4 million representing Other Equity Investments shown in the notes to the financial statements [without explanatory notes] . . . of the type of investments undertaken and any risks associated.”
    No clue as to where this money went.
    2.26 “In the 2018-2019 financial year, the entire $124 million investment in Clearwater Company in the Four Seasons Hotel project [Paradise Beach hotel] was written off.”
    How and why was this done? The Auditor General is at a loss, as are we. You remember who the man in charge was and who was the lawyer?
    3.10 “A review of the accounts and accounting systems of the Prime Minister’s Office [PMO] revealed a number of control weaknesses. These included some omissions to the fixed asset register, absence of a contract register as required by Financial Rule 229, and the absence of invoices for credit card payments.”
    Albert Einstein asserted: “Anyone who doesn’t take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.”
    Who guards the guards?
    The report goes on to state in
    3.11: “In addition to the above, there was the incorrect classification of expenditure [in the PMO] totalling $1.85 million.”
    Who guards the guards?
    Writing in 1840, French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville wrote about despotic government emerging in democratic America. Tocqueville held that a “crisis” could create the precondition for the expansion of state power. He saw the democratic state creating a new form of tyranny, being part “despotism”, part “tutorship” and part “paternalism” of the people. He argued that while various external forms of liberty remained, the “will of the people” is reduced to a “timid sheep-like status” with the state acting “like the national shepherd”.
    Barbadians need to consider this as we are pushed headlong towards an undefined republican status. Recall how in Guyana its then prime minister used the art of distraction to contort the country from a constitutional monarchy, to a ceremonial presidency and on to a despotic executive presidency.
    Guyana’s former President Cheddi Jagan once referred to this manipulation of the constitution and the people as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing”, using the biblical idiom derived from Matthew 7:15: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.”
    Who guards the guards?
    With regard to the planned ACATA Bill, the Bar president, while endorsing a zero-tolerance approach to corruption, made the point that this zero tolerance must pervade the entire society “from top to bottom”. Further, the point was made that this agency would only be effective “if it is accompanied by a modern anti-corruption act to complement the Proceeds And Instrumentalities Of Crime Act
    and other relevant legislation”.
    The Bar also expressed concerns about the Prime Minister’s lead role in appointing the Director General.
    Who guards the guards?
    Guy Hewitt currently lives and works between Barbados and Florida, and recently announced his candidature for the leadership of the Democratic Labour Party. He can be contacted at guyhewitt@gmail.com.

    Source: Nation


  25. I missed the part where he admitted the culpability of the DLP.

    Very disingenuous.

    This is just more of the same kind of politics.

    Very disappointing!


  26. I don’t know if Guy is the man or not but the same people that have criticized Verla in the past are heaping criticism on him now, whomever is leader of the DLP should have a thick hide.

    Why should Wickham opinions count for anything? Wasn’t he brownnosing Mia recently in an interview with the Advocate providing excuses for her large cabinet? Wickham effectively said she had no choice if she was to prevent her large caucus from infighting, so to solve the problem she gifted almost everyone with a Ministry which in Wickham’s opinion was “a prudent political decision” in effect the end justifies the means but although 30 -0 is unprecedented it was hardly the first time that a Barbados Gov’t had an overwhelming majority but somehow those PM’s didn’t feel the need to give away the store.

    As per Wickham
    “I think the Prime Minister as a result of that made a prudent political decision in making the Cabinet as large as it is, as that is the only way you can preserve the integrity of your government, because if you can’t then the government will face infighting. The fact that within days of the Cabinet being appointed, three people were left out and one of these persons immediately decided to cross the floor and become Opposition Leader, that to me provides the best proof that the Prime Minister made a prudent decision to setting up the Cabinet in the way she did, and frankly I would not advise her to change her at this stage,”

    One of those three is now the non resident High Commissioner to Canada, the fatted calf is dead, politicians now living high on the hog.


  27. Well the old guards have decided to make there present officially known
    Here comes Guy Hewitt
    Interesting times ahead for the Dlp
    Truly interesting times


  28. Hewitt: Trying to save country’s soul
    In officially launching his campaign to become the next leader of the embattled Democratic Labour Party (DLP) yesterday at Hilton Barbados, former diplomat Reverend Guy Hewitt revealed that a week before deciding to challenge current leader Verla De Peiza, he had no interest in elective politics.
    What changed was what he was seeing in Barbados, Hewitt told a small crowd gathered at the Needham’s Point, St Michael venue, that included former ministers Ronald Jones and John Boyce, as well as former Speaker of the House Michael Carrington, former MP James Paul, and another former diplomat and senator, Haynesley Benn.
    In a 40-minute speech punctuated with references to the DLP founder and Father of Independence, National Hero and former Prime Minister Errol Walton Barrow, Hewitt said his challenge of the current president was in no way a sign of internal issues, but a true test of democracy at a time when preservation of the country’s soul was most important.
    “A few weeks ago, I affirmed I had no desire for there to be a contested leadership of the DLP. However, my perspective quickly changed as persons both inside and outside the party made it clear that the time has come for new leadership.”
    The clergyman reminded all present that challenges of DLP leadership was nothing new. He recalled that Sir Frederick “Sleepy” Smith had challenged Barrow, while Brandford Taitt had come up against Clyde Mascoll, who was later challenged by former Prime Minister, the late David Thompson.
    “Today is the first step in the quest to reclaim the soul of our nation,” he said about his desire
    to lead the country’s largest mass-based political organisation.
    Hewitt, the former High Commissioner to London, said the Dems needed to get back to basics since the way Barbados voted as a single constituency in the 2018 election was not to vanquish the party forever.
    “We need to restore democracy, social values and cohesion and create opportunities for economic empowerment. It cannot be that our young unskilled males are faced with the binary choice of drugs or cleaning the public road.”
    The fledgling politician noted that though Barbadians had spoken in no uncertain terms during the last election, he did not believe they did so to create a one-party state.
    “However, I’m equally aware that the populace wanted to send a clear message to the type of leadership and politics that will not be tolerated,” Hewitt added. (BA)


    SOURCE: NATION NEWS


  29. Time proves rumours true
    In true RPB style, this week’s CouCou offering is a bag of riddles.
    If you are an avid consumer of this column, by the end you should be able to guess who or what am I.
    It seems the rumour mill wasn’t so wrong a few years ago when it kept insisting that a certain person had aspirations to move into a top position as a means to an end.
    Back then some political observers warned that it wouldn’t be too long before you start to see movement in a certain direction. While it took a while to come to the fore, recent unfolding events showed that a lot of behind-the-scenes work had been going on all that time.
    Curiously, the individual at the centre of attention and who is being pushed has not come out and pointedly state that this is what they want. No. Rather, we are hearing: “This is not what I want but what the people are calling for and therefore I am bowing to the will of the people.”
    To ensure the spotlight never leaves them for
    too long, just as things seem to be quiet, an event, orchestrated or not, happens and the individual seizes upon the opportunity to have the national attention back on them.
    However, the individual’s actions have caused such a disturbance that many of the old guard have come out. Some are offering support for democracy at work while others are concerned about the damage that could be done to the image of the respected institution.
    Old faces emerge
    Some of the old faces emerging have not been seen in a long time, especially since that big event a few years ago and even further.
    But the public spectacle of naked political ambition at the expense of the institution is not sitting well with some who are looking on from the outside. This is especially so when raw ambition is coupled with what could be perceived as forcing out another person in order to achieve a dream of power.
    Public sympathy most times goes with the underdog, the one who was there in good times and bad times; the one who has shown an undying loyalty to the cause and has been steadfast in the face of adversity.
    The individual would do well to take heed of the ruin that followed Macbeth’s observation of “vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself and falls on th’ other”.

    SOURCE: NATION NEWS


  30. https://www.barbadosadvocate.com/sites/barbadosadvocate.com/files/styles/large/public/field/image/1DSC_6583.jpg

    https://www.barbadosadvocate.com/sites/barbadosadvocate.com/files/styles/large/public/field/image/1DSC_6578.jpg

    Hewitt promoting a new dawn for democracy

    Sat, 06/12/2021 – 5:00am

    Reverend Guy Hewitt has officially thrown his hat in the ring for the presidency of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), contending that his love for Barbados has propelled him to stand up, step forward and urge others to join him on a “journey to preserve this country’s democracy”.

    He made the comments yesterday evening at the Hilton Barbados, where he officially launched his candidature. Addressing an audience that included party members, formers Members of Parliament, Senate and Cabinet, and members of the private sector, he effectively signalled his goal to speak out against the shortcomings of the current Administration, to lead the DLP into the next general election and inaugurate a new dawn for democracy in Barbados.

    “Barbados has been blessed with a few great leaders, some good ones, and given the law of averages, one or two not so good, and that is not for us to debate tonight. But the strength of our democracy, the strength of our society has been the conviction that both our leaders and our people held a responsibility to this fair land of ours. But tragically, our tradition of outstanding leaders and statespersons have given way to those who use politics for personal glory and advantage and are preoccupied with creating a personal legacy. Equally tragic is the culture of fear that now permeates our politics,” he told those gathered.

    Hewitt said while he had no intention previously of getting into politics and did not think he had the “psyche of a politician”, he has since changed his mind, indicating that persons within and outside of the DLP have made it clear that the time is ripe for new leadership, not just in the DLP but, he argued, more importantly in Barbados.

    “Today, today comrades is the first step in the journey to reclaim the soul of our nation. We need to renew confidence in the party of the Right Excellent Errol Walton Barrow. We need to restore democracy and social values and social cohesion and create opportunities for economic empowerment,” he maintained.

    Hewitt continued, “It cannot be, it should not be that our young, unskilled males are faced with a binary choice of drugs on one side, or cleaning the public road on the other. That is not good enough.”

    The political first-timer’s comments came as he expressed serious concern about the management of this country and contended that the last three years under the current Administration have not been good for democracy, society and our economy.

    “I know that Barbadians never intended in 2018 to go to the polls to create a one-party state, or to vanquish the Democratic Labour Party for eternity. However, I am equally aware that the populace wanted to send a clear message of the type of leadership and politics that would not be tolerated. And we in the Democratic Labour Party have to say to Barbados, ‘We hear you and we get you.’ But now we have to send a message to the current Administration…” he said.

    Hewitt lamented that the country is once again in a severe recession, with the debt-to-GDP ratio skyrocketing and unemployment rates at “catastrophic” levels. Contending that people are suffering, the former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom said, “We can and we should do better.”

    “We have seen and I have articulated how the promises made on integrity, and transparency and good governance have all largely been broken. We must do better,” he maintained. (JRT)

    SOURCE: BARBADOS ADVOCATE


  31. ” the Hilton Barbados, where he officially launched his candidature ”

    uh wunda why an who pay fuh dis magnamatious event ?


  32. . It cannot be that our young unskilled males are faced with the binary choice of drugs or cleaning the public road.”
    The fledgling politician noted that though Barbadians had spoken in no uncertain terms during the last election, he did not believe they did
    so to create a one-party state
    Xxxxxc

    The above comment is true
    Not only true but a ringing slap and an indictment in the face of failed govt policies a govt who have pursued a path of towing the line of big business whilst thowing crumbs for the most vulnerable amongst society to clean up

    Xxxxi endorsed those comments


  33. HantsJune 12, 2021 8:22 AM

    ” the Hilton Barbados, where he officially launched his candidature ”

    uh wunda why an who pay fuh dis magnamatious event ?

    Xxxxxxx

    I would hasten to bet nothing was donated or given by the underground world driven by illicit or illegal activity


  34. Thanks for your opinion.

    The blogmaster takes note you have no issue discussing the matter of Hewitt challenging De Peiza because it is carried in the traditional media.


  35. DavidJune 12, 2021 8:43 AM

    Thanks for your opinion.

    The blogmaster takes note you have no issue discussing the matter of Hewitt challenging De Peiza because it is carried in the traditional media.

    Xxxcxcc
    Please note I have not espoused a view on his challenge to Verla
    But have endorsed his comments in reference to govt policies


  36. The point is you have no problem commenting on the matter now that it is covered in the traditional media. When BU posted you as per usual fitted ulterior motives to the blogmaster.


  37. DavidJune 12, 2021 9:34 AM

    The point is you have no problem commenting on the matter now that it is covered in the traditional media. When BU posted you as per usual fitted ulterior motives to the blogmaster.

    Xxxxxx
    So what !!!
    If the shoe 👞 fits wear it


  38. So predictable but the regulars know you well.

    You have zero credibility on the blog.


  39. If Rev. Guy Hewitt wants to “save the soul” of our democracy he has first to exorcise all the demons from the DLP. He has to confess the sins of the DLP, repent and ask for forgiveness.

    No wishy washy statement about “Barbadians have spoken on the kind of leadership they do not want” or some such drivel.

    This was not all about Freundel Stuart!

    He cannot exorcise him and move on with all the rest!

    If he wants to play the REVEREND let him do it properly!


  40. DavidJune 12, 2021 11:34 AM

    So predictable but the regulars know you well.

    You have zero credibility on the blog

    Xxxxx
    Don’t care even think to care what “regulars” think about me
    I rice at no one
    Xxxxxx


  41. Images of the event showed Ronald Jones, James Paul et al, the old guard.


  42. Et AL?


  43. DavidJune 12, 2021 12:56 PM

    Images of the event showed Ronald Jones, James Paul et al, the old guard

    Xxxcccccc
    Oh 👕
    Blouse and skirt


  44. Verla not ruffled by criticism
    President of the Democratic Labour Party, Verla De Peiza says she is hearing the noise from her latest challenger, this time coming from within the bowels of the party.
    But the attorney-at-law yesterday said she remains committed to serving the DLP, even as Reverend Guy Hewitt continues to speak publicly on his reasons for putting his hat in the ring, and why he cannot stand beside her in leading the party into the next general election.
    “This is internal party politics. Like any family we have our differences and we move on,” she told the Sunday Sun yesterday after a voice note with Hewitt was circulated on social media explaining why he could not support De Peiza.
    She added: “In the spirit of good democracy, Guy is allowed to continually change his position. And I remain committed to serving the party as leader.”
    Hewitt’s public comments came less than 24 hours after he had officially launched his candidacy to be the next party president at Hilton Barbados, where he said his decision to challenge De Peiza was not about internal strife, but more so about democracy. He even cited instances where party presidents such as Errol Barrow and Clyde Mascoll were challenged internally.
    In the voice-note Hewitt detailed reasons he felt De Peiza was the wrong person to lead the Dems and said he also wanted to clear the air about rumours circulating which indicated he was challenging De Peiza because he could not get a nomination to be the DLP candidate in the constituency of St John.
    “That is absurd. I have not sought a constituency
    because I am unable to support comrade De Peiza as the leader of the DLP, as I could not be a candidate and stand behind her,” the former diplomat said.
    “I am aware, as many are in the party and the country, that she does not possess the competencies to successfully lead us to victory. The byelection in St George North said it all,” he stated, pointing to the huge loss of first-time candidate Floyd Reifer suffered to the Barbados Labour Party’s Toni Moore last year.
    Hewitt said both the party and the people of Barbados were telling him they needed the leadership and the type of competencies, ability to mobilise people and resources, for the DLP to seriously offer itself as the next government of Barbados.
    (BA)

    Source: Nation


  45. The issue of integrity(PartII)
    By Guy Hewitt

    I concur with former United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower that “the supreme quality for leadership is integrity”. Even politics should be informed by rules and principles; it should not be just to win at any cost. The perspective of the Barbados Labour Party on integrity was laid bare for all to see when it allowed the Integrity In Public Life Bill to fail last year.
    Andy Armstrong, as chairperson of the Integrity Group Barbados Inc. (IGB) has this to say: “We are disappointed and in disbelief that that could have happened . . . . We’re not the experts in parliamentary procedure but it would seem like it was guaranteed to fail. One would have thought since this is one of, if not the most important piece of legislation they [the Government] had committed to pass in this first five years, I wouldn’t like to think that they really didn’t want it to pass.”
    As Barbados, being one of the few countries with no integrity legislation, this was for me this administration’s statement of intent that they had no plan to pass anti-corruption legislation. Lest we forget, the implementation of laws to eliminate corruption in public life was one of the pillars of the Barbados Labour Party’s 2018 election campaign.
    But why make it fail? What would motivate a Government to not want transparency and accountability in its operations? A good starting point is the Auditor General’s report that points to serious irregularities and breaches in good governance. Let the other actions speak for themselves: Five days after Mia Mottley was sworn in as Prime Minister and two days before she announced the Government would default on its debt, the firm White Oak Advisory was engaged for just over $27m to assist with restructuring roughly $7bn of debts. The Financial Times (FT) the world’s leading global business publication, described the contracting of the “two partner, small firm” as “absurd”.
    The FT, one of the world’s leading news organisations, recognised internationally for its authority, integrity and accuracy stated, “A little-known UK advisory firm stands to make about $27m from the restructuring of Barbados’s $7bn of debts, close to what Lazard earned seven years ago when it advised Greece on defaulted debt nearly 40 times bigger.”
    The article noted, “Barbados is not Greece, which had a massive debt stock, multiple debt instruments and huge political tensions . . . . Double-digit fees are for very large transactions that are super complicated with a large number of instruments and a large number of different creditors.” We further learned from the article that Citigroup earned roughly $3m from restructuring Jamaica’s $9bn of defaulted debts in 2013. Jamaica paid $3m in fees for $9bn of debt restructuring; Barbados paid $27m for $7bn. But we were forewarned: “Give me de vote and watch muh.”
    Several increases
    Bus fare was increased, VAT was increased, land tax was increased, National
    Insurance rates were increased, and personal income tax was increased. A Garbage and Sewage Contribution (GSC) levy was introduced, VAT on online transactions was imposed, airline travel and tourism development fee imposed and a surcharge on credit card use was imposed. The one tax that the administration was able to reduce was corporate tax.
    At a time when unemployment is at its highest and the economy at its weakest, we have the largest Cabinet in the history of Barbados and as I have highlighted in my articles, many are non-performing. It’s noteworthy that India, the world’s most populous country and sixth-largest economy, has only 21 cabinet ministers, 29 junior Ministers, and nine ministers of state.
    We are learning that Government appointments seem to be predicated solely on political considerations. We see a Department of Public Affairs created to duplicate the work of BGIS but staffed by political operatives. We saw how a post of executive chairperson at the QEH was fabricated and the wife of a Government minister installed despite her having no prior experience running a tertiary level hospital.
    But we were forewarned: “Give me de vote and watch muh.”
    Barbados struggles to attract foreign direct investment due to its default on loans and the scalping of investors that followed. Notwithstanding, we witnessed an international dispute between an Irish investor and a local hotelier. It was a source of embarrassment for Barbados as an investment jurisdiction as the investors pointed out serious failing in governance, including “court delay tactics”, and ‘abuse of personal relationships to circumvent creditors.’ All the while, the local hotelier received appointments from Government.
    We recall just a few years ago while in Opposition, Ms Mottley in her 2017 Budget Reply castigated the previous administration for “questionable deals” and what were deemed to be “special favours” for Mark Maloney and Preconco due to the numerous contracts awarded. We recall the BLPled public outcry over Mr Maloney’s plans to build the Hyatt Hotel.
    Now we learn that Mr Maloney was awarded a contract to build 265 houses on Government-owned lands at Chancery Lane. We are also hearing rumblings of non-competitive awards in the Sanitation Services Authority, Barbados Water Authority and MTW. We can’t blame Mr Maloney for doing what businesspersons are meant to do – making money doing business.
    This follows closely on behind the Government reneging on the sale of land at Lancaster, St James, to low- and middle-income earners. The common-law husband of a government minister is spearheading this project. But we were forewarned “Give me de vote and watch muh.”
    Highly valued
    I spoke previously to how, despite being aware that China values seniority highly and after deploying Sir Lloyd Erskine Sandiford, the Hon. Dr Chelston Brathwaite, and a diplomatic star, Francois Jackman, we are sending Hallam Henry, the youthful son of Hartley Henry, as our ambassador there. This is in addition to our struggle to discern
    what Ambassadors Liz Thompson and Clyde Mascoll do on a daily basis. But we were forewarned: “Give me de vote and watch muh.”
    Bob Marley said: “The greatness of a [person] is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.” Let us hope this Government wakes up to this reality and puts integrity back into public life. However, given their track record, it would be wise for good citizens to make contingency plans as they probably won’t.
    May the Lord continue to be the people’s guide.

    Guy Hewitt announced his candidature for the leadership of the DLP. He currently lives and works between Barbados and Florida. Email: guyhewitt@gmail.com


  46. Excellent response which I wholeheartedly endorse from Verla Depezia

    Xxxxxxxxxx

    Worth repeating especially at a time when govt policies are hell bent to protect the wealth of a few
    Meanwhile the 99 percent are being told by govt to hold strain
    Xxccccc

    Bob Marley said: “The greatness of a [person] is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.” Let us hope this Government wakes up to this reality and puts integrity back into public life. However, given their track record, it would be wise for good citizens to make contingency plans as they probably won’t.

    Quoted from Guy Hewitt statement


  47. Dems ‘chances good’

    Candidates say they see many dissatisfied Bajans
    by BARRY ALLEYNE barryalleyne@nationnews.com
    THE FIVE NEWEST CANDIDATES picked by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) for the next general election are confident of toppling their opponents, charging that Barbadians are very dissatisfied with the current Barbados Labour Party (BLP) administration.
    They are long-time candidate in St Joseph, Randall Rouse, attorney Bertnul Ricardo Harrison in St Michael North, former Young Dems president Courie Cox in St Michael Central, former senator Damien Griffith in St Michael North East and Oldwin Skeete in St Andrew.
    On Sunday, DLP president Verla De Peiza announced the additions for the poll, constitutionally due in 2023. The party has now named eight candidates, with the other three being De Peiza (St Lucy), Andre Worrell (St John) and Ryan Walters (St Michael North West).
    Griffith, who served as a Government senator from 2008 to 2010, will be attempting to unseat Prime Minister Mia Amor Mottley in St Michael North East. He said he was far from intimidated.
    Seats ‘winnable’
    “I think my chances are very good,” he told the DAILY NATION yesterday. “The last election showed us that all seats are winnable. Many people may feel it’s not the most optimistic of seats, but it is about what the electorate feels on the day.”
    The 38-year-old account manager said that in spite of the long time Mottley has served St Michael North East (since 1994), “there are significant areas where nothing has been done”.
    He said many people in the constituency continued to suffer, and that was where he would come in. “I believe there is an opportunity for a young candidate to take the seat away. I consider it a difficult task but I do that every day as the acting general secretary of the DLP. Everybody left us for dead but we are here now, like Phoenix, rising from the ashes.”
    Best opportunity
    Rouse, a four-time loser in St Joseph, who also ran as an Independent candidate last time out, said he was now older and wiser in the politics game, and felt this election could be his best opportunity since 2008.
    “I’m always positive about what I do and this time will be no different. I believe my chances are greater than ever before. What I will do is approach this campaign in a different way altogether, as before in some instances I was too relaxed, based on my heavy involvement in the communities of St Joseph. The support I’m getting now is more than I’ve ever gotten before.”
    The 65-year-old businessman said he had already identified the high level of unemployment among young people in the parish as his main area of concern, and one that was not being dealt with frontally by the current Member of Parliament, Attorney General Dale Marshall.
    “Too much of our young
    men continue to fall through the cracks and that I will be dealing with the most,” he said, adding that St Joseph had not gained as a community from the BLP’s tenure since 2018.
    Cox, 41, a businessman, said though he was confident, his focus was not just about winning St Michael Central currently held by Speaker Arthur Holder.
    “It is solely on the welfare of the people within these communities. We also have high unemployment and many issues with flooding. The dialogue I have been having with people is very encouraging. I’m heartened by it,” Cox said.
    Harrison, who will be going up against Minister of Industry and International Business Ronald Toppin, said his work on the ground had uncovered that many Barbadians were feeling a sense of “buyer’s remorse” about the BLP win in 2018. “A lot of people are upset about how things are going, and the fact that there is no real level of Opposition,” he said.
    Level of taxes
    He said Barbadians were also offended by the high level of taxes they were being asked to pay at a time when disposable income was at a minimum.
    “I feel my chances are as good as anyone else,” he said, while citing the shock loss by former Prime Minister, the late Bernard St John (later Sir Harold) to Anderson Morrison in 1971, and the 2018 win by the BLP’s Neil Rowe over the incumbent Chris Sinckler as examples of why one should never count out any candidate on the day.
    Skeete, a 46-year-old businessman and farmer, said he thought highly of his chances, as did others in the St Andrew constituency represented by BLP veteran George Payne. “There will be challenging and difficult times in this, but I’m confident I can overcome them,” he said.


    SOURCE: NATION NEWS

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading