Unfolding in Barbados, is the by-election in St George North with Ms. Toni Moore as the candidate for the Barbados Labour Party. In her response at the public announcement, she stated that she is going to “help labour.” It makes absolutely no sense at all because her job description is to “help labour,” and in addition she also sits as a Senator and is a member of the Sub- Committee of the Social Partnership.

Has Ms. Moore forgotten what a labour union is? By definition, it is an organized association of workers, trades or professions, formed to protect and further their rights and interests.

In fact, if the union needed advancement or a political voice to protect them in today’s Barbados, my argument is that the General Secretary of the largest workers union in Barbados, the Barbados Workers Union should not have accepted an offer to be candidate of a political party when she has the capacity to form her own political party.

The trade union movement has been at the cross roads in Barbados for some time and perhaps forming a worker’s party is the requirement to inject new life into this entity.

We all know the old adage, if only the lion knew its strength, then it would rule the world. In 2020, why would the leader of the largest workers union in Barbados accept the candidacy to be a part of political party and not create their own? Is it that there is a lack of vision?

In my opinion, there being no real labour parties left in Barbados, the onus on her should have been to realize this and form a labour party. Sadly Ms. Moore did not see this opportunity.

What is a labour party? It is simply a political party formed to represent the interests of ordinary working people. Based on their performance, both the BLP and the DLP have long since departed the model.

There are tremendous benefits that can be derived for the ordinary workers of Barbados if a worker’s union formed its own political party. An increase in the minimum wage, redirecting the emphasis of government to the ordinary working class instead of big business, redirection of government contracts, the development of housing for the working class, the development of workers co-operatives and business development that serves as a platform for black economic enfranchisement and the list goes on.

If she wins the by-election, the conflict of interest that will arise for Ms. Moore goes far beyond which hat she wears to ultimately which voice takes precedence, that of the Prime Minister or that of the members of the Barbados Workers Union. Based on her recent acts of conceding to government demands, it is unlikely that this will change. Most likely members of the workers union will not be confident about an altered relationship which will be perceived as the union in bed with the government.

One can be of the opinion that Ms. Moore was quite shortsighted. It is hoped that she has not dropped her bone for a reflection. However, there is scope for someone to take the trade union movement to new and greater heights than it has previously achieved.

213 responses to “Another Heather Cole Column – Another Perspective Toni Moore”


  1. Well written, logical and clearly articulating the reason why a conflict of interest has arisen. The departure of the two main parties from the labour ethos is a major point, despite those who, in a prior blog, defended the appointment based on their history.

    Times have changed and so too their philosophy. Anyone disputing this is being disingenuous.

    However, I am not convinced that there should be a labour party at all, in this era. The nature of government is that it has to take a stance for the good of the country, in the long term and at times this may be at odds with the immediate requirements of the labour movement.

    If the labour movement / party is the government, then decisions may be taken and very likely will be, that run contrary to the best long term interests of the country.

    There needs to be a separation of the labour movement from the government executive. Some may assert that the government is of the people, the workers, so there should be no such separation.

    However, in administering the affairs of state, one has to take into account the business capital owners, the international relations and commitments etc. This in addition to the short term versus long term view.

    A government deriving from the labour view will therefore be conflicted on stances and decisions on critical matters, as their priority will be the immediate labour demands. Some may say that this will not be so, that a balanced approach will be taken. How exactly? There is a clear conflict of interest that cannot truly be resolved by insular discussion between members of a Cabinet. This is akin to Chinese Walls in professional organisations. We all hear the theory, but they are a nonsense in reality. And a cabinet does not even have a structure such as Chinese Walls.

    For a truly transparent and honest representation process and resolution, there needs to be separation between the executive government and labour.

    This is not an attack on any party, nor any candidate, it is a view of the approach to governance.


  2. Have not heard her voice as Senator fighting on behalf of workers
    Far from it her opinion has so far sided with govt policies which has hurt the worker
    Furthermore did not muster opposition to govt policies or give alternatives solutions
    In my viewed she is being neutered
    As the old saying goes no man can serve two masters


  3. @ Mariposa

    You were right in that the president is trying to suggest that to oppose Ms Moore is an issue of sexism. It is disingenuous and deliberately wrong. Nonsense.
    It is an issue of conflict of interest, of ethics in public life. But, I am still waiting for someone to convince me that the president understands what ethics in public life means and to the wider Barbadian public ethics in public life is a foreign language..


  4. Heard Mia boisterous rants and raves spewing a litany of them do it so can she as if being a female gives her every conceivable right to be unethical
    Some one ought to remind her that the world has become much smaller than during that by gone political era when the rest of the world was shut out
    She ought to be more careful being cognizant of the fact that her every word can uplift or make further mess and cause confusion amongst the masses especially the youth


  5. Heather

    Why would you expect someone who up to two week ago was not interested in elective politic and had to be convinced, not only by the PM but also Trotman, ( to accept) to form her own political party?

    The history of third party in Barbados is poor.

    The history of the unions attached to a political party is strong.
    Maybe you should have researched when the BWU and NUPW were formed. under which leaders and how those leaders were connected to which party/government.

    IMO part of reason Moore accepted the offer was not only she will be able to serve the union at a higher level but she saw it also as an opportunity to serve her home town. If the by election was in St Lucy i think she would have declined.


  6. Also

    BWU was involved in housing solutions for he workers under Trotman(i think). Seem mangrove around the labour college and in the turning off the ABC highway


  7. John2

    You believe people on the blog stupid?


  8. “Most likely members of the workers union will not be confident about an altered relationship which will be perceived as the union in bed with the government.”

    xxxxxxx

    I have been informed a few days ago that that statement/opinion is wrong. “Generally” the workers are in support of Moore.
    Further evidence of this was member of BWU executive and BWA (bwu largest public membership) sitting on the stage behind her


  9. David

    NO! Well only one. i left you to guess at which one


  10. When is the next meeting of the Senate?
    I expect one less Independent Senator and one more BLP Senator
    About the sexism didn’t Mia a woman drum Agard a woman out of the BLP?
    #bajanshaveshortmemories


  11. in 2021 if the members of BWU think that Moore is not serving their interest then after the AGM she will be MP for SGN and fill another position in the union if she decide to stay.

    Check and balance are in place through the ballots.


  12. Crusoe

    You have your view. no one can take that away from you.

    Obviously Miss Moore and Trotman (who has been there) views are different to yours


  13. also the PM


  14. We have an aged old custom where the general secretary of the trade union is elevated to government. Mia Mottley has no problem continuing with the tradition. The question we must ask- how has it been working out for labour? Should the tripartite arrangement give pause to the practice? Looks like optics more than a substantive move.


  15. john2September 29, 2020 8:35 AM.

    Remember that when we accept or create precedents, we have to live by them, even if someone else holds the scrolls. We should always try to improve the structure.

    But you are right. I am nobody and I may be talking rubbish.


  16. Precedent was set decades ago. In you mind you are seeing it one way. in the mind of the union leader they are seeing it a different way. As i keep saying – when all is said and done it is the constituents / union member who will determine which road they want to take.

    I never said you are nobody or talking rubbish. just pointing out that their are other view than yours. Obviously yours is different to Moore’S


  17. Did Dr. Leroy McClean just say that the matter of the GS of the BWU running in SGN is a matter for that constituency only? That it is a sterile topic with so many more relevant issues around? Things said that make you go hmmm.


  18. @HC
    Good observations. However, possibly the truest interpretation is labour (she?) have decided they cannot overcome the BDLP duopoly. Even though neither is a ‘labour’ party. Where it gets dicey, is personal ambition versus professional ambition? The sad thing is Ms.Moore has risen to the pinnacle of the Union movement, been a member of the ‘Social Partnership’, sat on significant Boards like the NIS, been a Senator, without really distinguishing herself. Maybe politics can provide the opportunity to show us some true substance. As a gambling person, I’m not betting on it. Which may be all you need to know.


  19. But BU praises Senator Franklyn, an opposition senator. I am awaiting a logical argument as to why it is okay for Caswell to be a PdP senator. The problem with many on BU is the teaspoon level of depth in their arguments; therefore, a unionist in the lower or upper house is solely about advancing workers’ rights. 🤣🤣🤣


  20. Like most people on the blog, I am trying to understand how Moore’s being in the House on the government’s side will help workers.

    If there is a policy or law that is anti-worker, will she vote against it? If she does, will 1 – 28 matter? [I am setting the opposition factor to zero as we do in calculus].

    Would the workers not be better off with a leader who can take strike action without the encumbrance of party loyalty?

    Invoking the past behaviour of union leaders is irrelevant because: (1) none of them exercised this option with a government with a virtual monopoly of the house (2) 6workers have never been in such a perilous state as at the present moment.

    I think my taking up gymnastics may be easier… even at my age!


  21. @Cursoe, Northern Observer,

    I am still pondering on this “help labour” remark. Henry VIII had a motivation of getting a divorce when he decided to break with the Catholic church and create the Church of England.
    Mr. Atherley saw an opportunity to become the leader of the opposition and he seized it.
    Ms. Moore does fit into any of these categories, no motive or opportunity that only she saw. She accepted an offer.
    I assumed that her “help labour” was in reference to the labour movement. Now I wonder if she actually meant the Barbados Labour Party. If so now it makes complete sense.


  22. #opportunism


  23. iRONSIDE

    Was trotti not a MP in the 90s when he marched against Sandi? i am not sure if he was an MP or not – he could have even be a cabinet member (i dont recall.
    The point is that went it came to siding with the workers against his party/Goverment he toed the line with the way the workers voted.

    What or why should it be different for Ms Moore?


  24. @John2

    We have traveled this road before, the unions have access to the social partnership. The landscape has changed. This is about political expediency.


  25. if for some reason caswell had decide to run for his party you wouldnt be hearing this chatter from BU and especially from David. but because Caswell back down you will hear all the negative talk and especially from david


  26. I am embarassed that Ms Mottley chose to make this about sexism. I have seen many a sexist argument even against her lately but I have not seen it here. And if I haven’t seen it, you can be sure it ain’t there.

    I wish she had chosen to address the real and legitimate arguments, many of which have been raised here.

    Why do politicians insist on insulting our intelligence???? Don’t they yet see the changes occurring in the tolerance of the electorate??? The young people nowadays were not brought up on Kool Aid.

    I tend to agree with Crusoe’s approach of examining the changing environment and seeking to adjust according to the needs of the times. Crusoe should keep thinking and write a separate blog of his musings. We need a rethink of our system of government and its relationship to the people.

    If not now – WHEN?

  27. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Ms Cole, a few questions in line with those posed above.

    1.Why is it valid or important that Labour forms its own party to advance the need for 1) An increase in the minimum wage, 2) redirecting the emphasis of government to the ordinary working class instead of big business, 3) redirection of government contracts, 4) the development of housing for the working class, the development of workers co-operatives and business development that serves as a platform for black economic enfranchisement ???

    You are not naïve to perceive that a Labour party could ONLY concentrate on those objectives or that more importantly they an only be achieved under a government umbrella.

    I am lost frankly by your logical progression that taking “the trade union movement to new and greater heights” can only (or primarily) be achieved as a standalone party… that simply flies in the face of the historical successful achievements due to direct affiliation with political parties and the reality that modern day issues pushes concerns well beyond the base reality of simply an improved minimum wage!

    Everyone has to work and is thus a ‘worker’ but is everyone a union member or a member of the same union?… what will be the ideological philosophy of this party and will all workers adopt or believe in that ethos?

    About 154,000 people is report of voters in 2018 and union membership (all) is about 40,000 as a guess… so the presumption is that at least those members will support some new Labour Movement Party. At least that’s enough to win some seats, however… I presume!

    The concept sounds good but is practically implausible (irrational, even) in 2020 … the really interesting thing about the idea is that BOTH main parties adopted that EXACT thinking at formation (the BLPs as a remodeling somewhat) … so it seems you are saying that in this current, well-developed local Bim landscape these many, many years since those parties hefted their might and empowered workers’ voices that our workers’ rights are now so constrained, so under-whelming and so muted in the corridors of power that we need a brand new political Labour voice as a political party!… And that such a party will be the answer to our problems… SERIOUSLY!

    Ok, den!


  28. @John2

    You prefer to engage in hypotheticals?

    @Dee Word

    Why not establish a workers party is what is being asked.


  29. The Moore things could change or remain the same.

    Will she become a Minister in the Ministry of Labour or will she be allowed to warm a seat on the back benches so she can pay attention to her regular job as head of the BWU ?


  30. @ Hants good questions.


  31. @ Dribbler,
    The benefits that I have stated are presently outstanding and are being ignored by the ruling Administration.
    Also I am not saying that a new labour party should forget all the other problems in Barbados.

    Leading up to the last General Election there were several new parties who entered the fray. The union was noticeably absent although they have a large voting block. It is a wonder that the union which was distraught with the DEMS did not conceive the idea of entering the race.
    Missing also from the landscape is a party that has an emphasis on environmental issues.
    If it is to be taken as a rebirth so to speak, it will be unadulterated. The union would not be seeking to sit in another Administration where many think that it will be compromised.


  32. @ David
    I really see no problem with Ms. Moore joining the party of her choice, contesting an election and remaining GS of the BWU.
    However, what is the real role of the constituency in her selection? She was not a member of the party; had previously not expressed an interest in the constituency and was able to join a party; become it’s candidate all in the space of a week! Remarkable by any standards. Now in my limited mind , being a known rabble rouser, strife maker and all; I actually thought that the first consideration when interested in a constituency was to solve the problems and give the constituency proper representation .

    Things get curiouser and curiouser.

  33. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ dpD
    Thanks for exposing the under belly of this fictitious conflict of interest. I am still working at deciphering the real problem. Obviously what is sauce for the gander is not sauce for the goose. Or is there something more sinister?


  34. All distraction, keep your eyes on Mia, don’t blink.


  35. You Tube

    Nation Update: BWU at Arawak Cement
    61 views•Sep 29, 2020

    Deputy General Secretary of the Barbados Workers’ Union, Dwaine Paul, says they sanctioned the withdrawal of labour by members at the Arawak Cement Plant in Checker Hall, St Lucy, who have been trying unsuccessfully to meet with management. (Video by Reco Moore) #MeAndMyNation #YourNewsYourTimeYourWay #ILoveMyNation246 #NationBarbados #Nation246 #Barbados


  36. How will the General Secretary handle this Labour unrest which is occurring as she begins her journey to Parliament ?

    St.George is a safe seat and she will win the by election.


  37. @ William

    You are right. If Ms Moore wants to join a party and stand for parliament, that is her democratic right. But, if she is in the Senate as an independent senator, and, as far as we know, not a member of any political party, then joins the ruling party a week before she was selected, then this suggests deception. Was all this cooked up during the prorogation?
    The ethical thing to do is to resign as an ‘independent’ senator, which quite clearly she no longer is, and contest the seat for the BLP. So far she still remains an ‘independent’ senator.
    I also question her membership of the so-called Social Partnership. But, in the final analysis, Ms Moore, like the nation, is the victim of a politically devious and unethical prime minister.


  38. NorthernObserver September 29, 2020 11:27 AM
    The sad thing is Ms.Moore has risen to the pinnacle of the Union movement, been a member of the ‘Social Partnership’, sat on significant Boards like the NIS, been a Senator, without really distinguishing herself.

    David September 29, 2020 12:17 PM
    #opportunism

    (~_~)
    There, right there in black white. That is all it is.
    Forget the lotta long talk.
    People biting their tongues, “intellectualizing” and trying to avoid calling a club a club.

    Who MAM likes get picks and who she don’t like get licks. Like it or lump it.
    Who’s gonna bell that cat?


  39. @ Heather Cole
    The country is polarized and any workers party would be politically crushed by BLPDLP and it’s essentially politically blind membership. In other words if a BLP is at the head , the leadership could do no wrong and true representation will suffer; when a DLP is at the head vice versa.
    Ask Dr. George Bell why his Workers Party failed. I attended the very last Annual General meeting .
    Peace.


  40. @William

    Yours is another valid perspective, there are a few.


  41. Hants

    She already stated that she is willing to do it as a backbencher


  42. Whatever happened to the Movement for National Liberation?


  43. Labour unions and political parties in the English speaking wider Caribbean have always been Siamese twins, ALWAYS in bed together.

    If I count from Guyana in the south to Jamaica in the north, from Barbados in the east to Belize in the west, I can probably come up with at least 100 names.

    Nothing new here.

    Moving on.


  44. The D’s vex as hell because they feel that auntie has [politically] seduced Toni, whom we all thought was a Dem.

    But Toni has both the word “yes” and the word “no” in her mouth, doe she not?


  45. “D’s” gettin’ on like a fella dat get a horn.


  46. MAM got wunna dizzy. Note the lady stated that it was not the first time she approached Toni Moore. Listen to Ryan Straughn, Marsha Caddle, Wilfred Abrahams and many of the current MPs about running. I repeat, a leader of a workers’ union is the leader of opposition business in the Senate. Leh dah sink in.


  47. @Enuff September 29, 2020 11:44 AM “But BU praises Senator Franklyn, an opposition senator. I am awaiting a logical argument as to why it is okay for Caswell to be a PdP senator.?”

    Because truly people love an underdog.

    Underdogs being less threatening than pit bulls.

    Apologies to all those who love their pit bulls.

  48. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, I am lost, confused and discombobulated… 🤣…I gave a simple but I thought precise commentary on the nonsense of a new Workers Labor Party and you still said: “Why not establish a workers party is what is being asked.” …EH ????

    You surely missed the point that such a party CANNOT stand on the simple platforms noted by Ms Cole or that workers are NOT monolithic in beliefs, ideologies or anything that drives political desires!

    Thanks @Skinner you were more emphatic than I was!

    @Ms.Cole, you are an intelligent lady with strong convictions but at times your commentaries appear untethered to historical and modern context. I repeat… I cannot conceive how ANY workers party today will distinguish itself as a powerful POLITICAL party!

    Workers have already successfully started and developed well financial vehicles providing housing and business loans; they gave started and then reconsidered retail coop businesses; they have had a voice at the powerful center of government for years now; they have developed and expanded housing accommodations for members; and they have offered excellent educational courses to increase their members working effectiveness/rights!

    Just a few highlights of their growth and power!… So can you please realistically tell me what special new awareness or power or control the formation of a Workers political entity will satisfy… the concept had it’s day but all parties formed based on the workers movement has HAD to grow beyond that if they wanted to reach the governance role and then grow further to continue as a viable party: Panday in T&T is the easy reference.

    The formula used by Sr Frank or O’Brian Trotman and now by Ms Moore to agitate from within the party is STILL viable … the workers are already at the head table with the pols and the corporate chieftains so you are effectively saying that the union officers there have NOT been effective (raising minimum wage, e.g.) and thus you want to start over again with a new party.

    That strategy seems counter-productive to me and although it would gets us a brash new awareness very little in real benefit would accrue!

    You can do just as well by putting more aggressive officers in place if you think the current group are Vichy collaborator types!

    I gone.


  49. Cuhdear Bajan
    He’s still a member of the “political class”.🤣🤣

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading