Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Unfolding in Barbados, is the by-election in St George North with Ms. Toni Moore as the candidate for the Barbados Labour Party. In her response at the public announcement, she stated that she is going to “help labour.” It makes absolutely no sense at all because her job description is to “help labour,” and in addition she also sits as a Senator and is a member of the Sub- Committee of the Social Partnership.

Has Ms. Moore forgotten what a labour union is? By definition, it is an organized association of workers, trades or professions, formed to protect and further their rights and interests.

In fact, if the union needed advancement or a political voice to protect them in today’s Barbados, my argument is that the General Secretary of the largest workers union in Barbados, the Barbados Workers Union should not have accepted an offer to be candidate of a political party when she has the capacity to form her own political party.

The trade union movement has been at the cross roads in Barbados for some time and perhaps forming a worker’s party is the requirement to inject new life into this entity.

We all know the old adage, if only the lion knew its strength, then it would rule the world. In 2020, why would the leader of the largest workers union in Barbados accept the candidacy to be a part of political party and not create their own? Is it that there is a lack of vision?

In my opinion, there being no real labour parties left in Barbados, the onus on her should have been to realize this and form a labour party. Sadly Ms. Moore did not see this opportunity.

What is a labour party? It is simply a political party formed to represent the interests of ordinary working people. Based on their performance, both the BLP and the DLP have long since departed the model.

There are tremendous benefits that can be derived for the ordinary workers of Barbados if a worker’s union formed its own political party. An increase in the minimum wage, redirecting the emphasis of government to the ordinary working class instead of big business, redirection of government contracts, the development of housing for the working class, the development of workers co-operatives and business development that serves as a platform for black economic enfranchisement and the list goes on.

If she wins the by-election, the conflict of interest that will arise for Ms. Moore goes far beyond which hat she wears to ultimately which voice takes precedence, that of the Prime Minister or that of the members of the Barbados Workers Union. Based on her recent acts of conceding to government demands, it is unlikely that this will change. Most likely members of the workers union will not be confident about an altered relationship which will be perceived as the union in bed with the government.

One can be of the opinion that Ms. Moore was quite shortsighted. It is hoped that she has not dropped her bone for a reflection. However, there is scope for someone to take the trade union movement to new and greater heights than it has previously achieved.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

213 responses to “Another Heather Cole Column – Another Perspective Toni Moore”


  1. Errol Barrow was not Grantley Adams; Tom Adams or Bree St John was not Barrow; Sandiford was not Barrow; Owen Arthur was not Sandiford; Thompson was not Arthur; Stuart was not Thompson and Mottley is not Stuart. Why on earth should Depeiza try to be Mottley?


  2. Bree and sandi did not have that special ” rockstar fire”, inherited the PMship and lost it next election.


  3. didnt Sandi win an election in 1991?


  4. I FOR GOT STUART. he is with the other 2 – he won an election but he is with the other two


  5. The by election is a good economic move. It cannot make up for the lost of tourism or even crop over but every little bit is a help.

  6. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Donna, whenever I read comments like yours : “Mia needs some time looking in the mirror…” I recall the Barrow mirror screed but also Michael’s ‘Man in the Mirror”* and reflect on how we need to reflect on our ‘mirror mage’.

    In sum, WE have enabled her behaviour and her ascension to this office thus we will suffer (or benefit) until we disable her!

    MAM is the same bully that is POTUS or Jair Bolsonaro or any such pol leader… It is unlikely that she will change now – why should she if what she has done has gotten her this high level of success – so it seems the change again must come from us!

    The MAM strategy to neuter all opposition by coopting them is a displeasing trait … there should be a vocal and strong opposition always to keep you on your toes … that she wants to silence all offers a troubling sense of megalomania as she must perceive that no one knows better than her omnipotence and should be on her choir or she will crush them!

    More power to Sen Franklyn and others like him fighting against this danger. As noted otherwise… this too may end very BADLY for Bim!

  7. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    “…“I am not offended by it, simply because I don’t expect any better behaviour.

    It is sad that they would help someone who is down on their luck and unemployed with $400 and then take ten years to walk about telling people about it,” Senator Caswell Franklyn said

    The fact is that, like Donald Trump, Mia Mugabe Mottley is afraid of the challenge to her incumbent position

    Caswell Franklyn IS THE SINGLE GREATEST THREAT that Mia Mugabe Mottley faces

    So she is using this nasty unethicsl tactic to attack the single man that she fears in the whole of Barbados

    Senator Caswell Franklyn!

    http://imgur.com/85lnP0P

    When the leader of a country Mia Mottley has to go so low as to dig up a personal $400 grant to an unemployed man, made 10 years previously, BAJANS CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT SORT OF PERSON SHE IS!

    But then again we can only imagine what the surgery to replace a Clitoris that was bitten out costs!!!


  8. @ Piece “replace a Clitoris.”

    A clitoris cannot be replaced. A clitoris has multiple extremely sensitive nerve endings. Surgery may place something down there that looks like a clitoris, but it is unlikely to function like a healthy clitoris. A woman who has lost her clitoris has, even though not rendered infertile, has effectively been castrated, and is unlikely ever again to experience orgasm. The loss of the ability to experience orgasm is a serious sexual/emotionally injury. It is not a joke

    Because what’s the use of sex without orgasm?

    However Bajan men in error tend refer to cunnilingus as “biting”, but NO biting ought to occur down there. The teeth ought not to be used at all.

    Cunni=the wedge-shaped characters used in the ancient writing systems of Mesopotamia, Persia, and Ugarit [so a wedge or triangular shaped area]

    Lingus=is in reference to the tongue [NOT the teeth]. Also related to linguistics etc. [the study of language, as in mother tongue.

    So the tongue, NOT the teeth ought to be used.

  9. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    @ simple simon

    The rumours of your stupidity are unfounded today

    You have taken what de ole man, afraid of what Barbados has become under Mugabe, was forced to fashion that clitorus bite out rumour as.

    An aside!

    But here it is that you, a woman knowledgeable in this matter of a clitoris, mutilated by this act, is now to use your words “castrated”

    Your words and mastery of the description of this permanent mutilation and removal of sensory sensation would leave a man, or a woman, or an inbetweener, with an involuntary contraction of your own parts.

    CAN you think of the animal that could be so disposed to effect that mutilation on another human Simple Simon?

    And once you compare that action, with this action of speaking about $400 lent to a former BLP member, what comes to your mind Simple Simon?

  10. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    De ole man wonders if wunna remember this Stoopid Cartoon of de grandson?

    http://imgur.com/8FeoWt7

    Look how this woman Toni Moore who is in this cartoon is out front and centre marching for de oppressed workers..

    This is Toni Moore, who is supposed to be a union leader, “the representative of the interests of the oppressed common worker” here with the bull horn marching for the oppressed workers

    AT THE SAME TIME here is the same Toni Moore running as a representative of the same government she as union leader is duty bound to represent!

    How do bajans think she is going to be able to represent workers WHILE SHE WORKING FOR THE SAME GOVERNMENT?

  11. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    Your additional assistance please Honourable Blogmaster


  12. David
    Your argument continues to be illogical. There are 4 government senators who are hold a ministerial or parliamentary secreatary role. Three of them, like Caswell, have never offered themselves to the public. Are those three apolitical? 🤣🤣🤣

  13. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    Your assistance please Honourable Blogmaster with the post with Toni Moore and her bull horn


  14. BU is the best. The BU crew argues that Caswell is an expert on civil service matters. He says the PM offers him a job to oversee all Permanent Secretaries and BU crew now cussing the PM. I thought all yuh say the civil service needs revamping? I thought all yuh argued all persons, regardless of their political stripes should be used? The fact he said the PM said it openly tells us what? Only last night the PM spoke about the need for similar posts. Is the current government the most anti-worker as the Senator claims or not? A few months ago, the senator was stated:
    “It is bordering on corruption that this man is going home in less than a year, and is being promoted to deputy so he would get the pension based on the deputy commissioner’s salary……..It has nothing to do with any efficiency in the police force. What will someone responsible for personnel do in crime fighting. The police does not need a person who is trained at the level of deputy commissioner to do personnel work. They could have gotten a senior personnel officer from the Ministry of the Public Service. You don’t need an HR person at the level of Deputy Commissioner”. Wasn’t that insulting to Oral Williams? In that same article the senator is referred to as “representing the People’s Party for Democracy and Development”. All yuh are hypocrites.


  15. Mia needs to talk about all the tens of millions of dollars = BILLIONS stolen from the treasury and pension fund over the last 50 years, she needs to talk about all the elderly that got robbed their estates and their beneficiaries of their futures, she needs to talk about the 1 billion dollars the minority business people stole IN VAT and she wrote it off like if it was hers instead of LOCKING UP THE MINORITY THIEVES WHO ROBBED BLACK BAJANS..

    ..she needs to talk about the old man’s body, Mr. Steele, that was STOLEN FROM THE QEH and hurriedly buried, and his estate robbed, they even stole his car and attempted to process letters testamentary ROBBING HIS BENEFICIARIES living in UK, while judge(s), registrar, police, the Afghan dude who is a convicted felon in London and Deidre Alleyne a civil servant and neighbor of Mr. Steele, her victim… thought they were free and clear until they got the shock of their lives..and had to RESCIND the letters testamentary…

    TALK ABOUT THAT…


  16. The million dollar question of the day
    Was OSA right?
    I believe so
    The higher Mia climb the more her tail becomes exposed


  17. Mia made a big mistake attacking Caswell
    There is a ground swell if support across social media
    Many branding Mia as a despot
    Again i ask was OSA right about Mia character


  18. Well well Ms Mottley is disgraceful for exposing the hypocrisy of Mr Franklyn which he has not denied but he can get up and lambaste people and the BU group has no problem.The old people had a saying what is good for the goose good for the gander.In other words if you can, t stand the heat stay to hell out the kitchen.I wonder where this outrage was when the Dems spent a whole night cussing Ms Mottley.It was so disgraceful that it was condemed in and outside Barbados to the point they had to remove the entire thing.Now that is disgraceful and they are yet to apologise for it.

  19. Piece the Prophet Avatar

    @ Mariposa or AC

    The whole issue here is that Senator Caswell Franklyn is seen as the single man in Barbados who is willing and able to fight Mugabe Mottley

    Look around the island Mariposa and call another person’s name who has had the intestinal fortitude to stand up to this Dictator Mugabe Mottley

    And that is why all this noise to try and discredit this man with integrity!

    http://imgur.com/a/IrfYadG

    But it does not matter whu Mugabe does, Caswell Franklyn gine un mek she at the polls!

    Leh de ole man give wunna a strategy.

    Call a meeting with Verla and announce it in the news.

    Sign what would be a “non aggression agreement between the PdP and the DLP!

    Put it to the test in St George North

    I, Piece the Prophet, prophesy dat it will destroy ANY BLP BRIBERY CAMPAIGN DEM PLANNING!

    De ole man will give you gents strategy!

    Let the natural synergies of Bajan community and word of mouth word for your joint effort AGAINST ALL THE MILLIONS THE BLP HAS!

  20. William Skinner Avatar

    PM’s political playbook ‘fixated on optics’
    A senior academic and social scientist is urging Prime Minister Mia Mottley’s political “handlers” to rethink the strategy of pushing her constantly before the international press in what appears to be a case of “profile building” and a “fixation on optics”.
    The position has been outlined by head of the Sir Arthur Lewis Institute for Social and Economic Studies (SALISES) at the Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies (UWI) Dr Don Marshall, who linked it to regional political strategist Hartley Henry and slammed the tactic as “tone deaf”.
    Writing on his Facebook page, Marshall said: “Last week the Prime Minister Mia Amor Mottley herself was at the receiving end of an inconsiderate question by a British journalist.
    She responded well but I posted elsewhere that her handlers should rethink having our Prime Minister routinely appear before the international press circuit as it’s not the place for her Office and the demands of the job.
    Her campaigns for the cause of SIDS [Small Island Developing States] at international summitries and conferences have already raised her profile.”
    The UWI academic added: “We also had a Throne Speech mid-term replete with partisan rhetoric and reminder of the Party’s Manifesto pledges.
    This detracted from what ought to have been a post-lockdown, post-COVID call to action with a coherent, budgeted, Development Renewal Plan with key performance targets and clear signposts.
    “I well recall the BERT [Barbados Economic Recovery and Transformation programme] which spoke more to fiscal rebalancing than transformation touching such chords as with appeals to ‘stay the course’.
    “All of the above causes me to ask after her handler/s. I am attempting here something that may be unprecedented and that is to question a political strategy based on building the profile of the leader as key to regime consolidation.”
    Marshall charged that the current Mottley political strategy translated to all ministerial successes being so attributed to her, while “all failures deflected elsewhere”.
    The SALISES head questioned the effectiveness of Mottley’s “decorous silence” on many important issues such as “violent gun crime and violence against women” and the lack of details on “finance and developmental strategy behind assigning $300 million for tourism”.
    Marshall went further.
    “All we are having [is] a fixation with optics and that optics is around Prime Ministerial performance. It dovetails with a swerve towards populist leadership internationally but as we observe – the austerity and inequalities, and the effects of COVID on livelihoods are leading to great social unease.
    “The impacts of what’s happened to the existing model of development, the meltdown of the working majority, and the many years of drift among large swathes of our youth exposes the Hartley Henry obsession with promoting the personality and aura of the Prime Minister as palpably, tone deaf.”
    Marshall added: “Surely if the end game is to win elections then such strategists need to hone a better craft. You can win an election and lose legitimacy. Occupying office even with a 2/3 majority still means you preside over collapse and decay.
    “Time [for] Hartley and others who so advise, pack a purposive model of development to augment the statecraft they seek to advise.”
    In his posting, the social scientist described Mottley’s attack on trade unionist and Opposition Senator Caswell Franklyn during a political meeting last weekend in St George North as “an unfortunate episode in the life of our Prime Minister”.
    He suggested that Hartley Henry’s playbook had “gone awry”. (IMC1)
    (From Barbados Today )
    Dr. Don Marshall is s Barbadian living overseas who don’t know a damn thing about Barbados. Who the hell give he rights to say the PM is an attention grabber? He needs to stay where he is and left people who live about here to talk. He just want the country to fail.


  21. @ William

    All the views expressed by Don have been aired on BU. Watch the predators coming out, those who have been fed by Mottley and owe her a thank you.


  22. @William

    Can you accept that BU is an open forum and commenters will share different views which are motivated by wide considerations? Just make your point and let it contend with all the others

    Steupse.

  23. William Skinner Avatar

    @ David
    Politely , why are you directing such a comment at me?


  24. Because you always have to attach that it is people on the island making a similar point to respond to commenters who throw barbs at Bajans overseas. It is not necessary. Those people are in the minority on the blog.


  25. What Don Marshall say is true
    Mia handlers are too occupied with making her a celebrity
    Instead of having her focus on the nation economic and social problems
    Meanwhile in gets on stage behaving in yardfowl fashion and attack a fellowman
    Hope some one sending copies of her SGN performance to the international media for prosperity

  26. William Skinner Avatar

    @ David
    Oh , I see. Thanks. It’s your blog ,I will refrain from exposing their puerile offerings . Message given . Message taken.
    Peace.


  27. @ William

    Stop it. You left the island and now you are attacking us for everything we do or say. The moment you got on that plane you lost your Barbadian-ness. Stop it and go away. Send your remittances, otherwise forget us.


  28. From what the public can discern INDEPENDENT Senator Toni Moore made her contribution in the Upper House yesterday.


  29. dAVID

    Thanks for putting that childish refrain to an end

  30. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Hal
    For over five years or more , the jokers were never told to deal with the subject and forget the puerile nonsense. All I did was just turn around to expose their silliness and that rattled the Blogmaster. He cannot claim innocence here because he too joined the nonsense when convenient. In his world calling people JAs and RHs is just fine.
    The irony of the situation is that I expected that response but from my earliest days at Bay Primary, I was taught to respect other people’s property. It’s his blog.
    I am still a rabble rouser and strife maker , who lives overseas and don’t know one crap about what goes on in Barbados.I just want the country to fail and I hate Mottley.
    Peace.


  31. Damn

    i have never come across a grown man that so touchy. SOME old women usually exibit that trait.


  32. @ William

    The smartest of us remained in Barbados. Only the failures left. Now they want to talk about how the country should be run. Fools. Send the remittances and forget about Barbados, you foreigners.
    Go away. I am busy talking about Trump and Brexit.


  33. @William, Hal

    foreigners go home.


  34. @William

    Rattled? Trying to help septuagenarians and octogenarians from engaging in repeated childish behaviour.

    @Greene

    You are what is called a galusbait…LOL. you are transparent.


  35. First let me dispose of the “puerile” offerings.

    The DLP attack on Ms. Mottley at that first meeting of the 2018 elections was disgraceful. Any respect I had for any of the participants died on that night. Nasty men.

    As far as I know, Caswell Franklyn was not one of the participants and was not and still is not a member of the Democratic Labour Party. A little birdie told me that he was most recently a member of the BLP. That, I hear, is how he managed to qualify for the $400 crumb.

    Next puerile offering – the mere fact that Caswell, knowing Ms. Mottley well, felt uncomfortable accepting the more than $400 position she offered him should indicate what he believed to be her motive.

    Furthermore, if Ms. Mottley wished to avail herself of his “expertise” she could get it by way of his interventions and through their interactions in his current position as head of the union.

    Now to grown up talk – we concur wholeheartedly with Dr. Don Marshall who actually is agreeing with most of BU, both overseas and stay at home contributors.

    Wuhlaus!

    P.S. I am especially concerned about the $300m to the tourism industry. I want DETAILS.


  36. @Donna

    There is a good article by Simon in BT a couple weeks ago which dealt with the 300 million. Will try to locate it.


  37. From what i have read/heard about the 300M for the hotels i am ok with it for the fact that it is to
    1. keep the workers employed
    2. It is a loan to the hotels which has to be paid back when the tourist arrival pick up.

    Even if any hotel goes bankrupt and is unable to pay back then at least the workers would have profited.
    This is the time of the year that the hotel workers would have been coming back to work for the season and earning their pay.


  38. David,

    I will find out who Simon is, I suppose, when you post the article. I would need to know his position in the administration that authorizes him to speak on its behalf before I play Simon Says.


  39. @Donna

    Very funny, he is Dr.Simon Naitram. The president of the BES.


  40. @John 2, if I do not recall the entire $300M being a loan. My contention with BEST was that a labour government should never have conceived or a labour union consider such a package that does not offer severance or a bailout for the workers.
    Keeping persons employed did not work as many were lay offs and some unemployment benefits ran out, while many have difficulty getting unemployment benefits. There was no equity in the distribution. I do not even think that all of it must be paid back.


  41. @ Heather

    There is a lot of hocus pocus about the proposed Bds$300m bailout for the hotel sector. First, will it be a grant or a loan? How will it be decided? Will this be based on an analysis of revenue over the two/three last financial years? Will any of the beneficiaries be disqualified if they are outstanding with VAT, income tax or national insurance payments to government? Will jobs be guaranteed?
    We also want to know if this is the best way of spending $300m of taxpayers’ money or could it have been better spent? There are also wider economic questions, such as the damage t o skills inflicted by the pandemic and the absence of any publicly known epidemiological model.so want to know how this $300m spend fits with the government’s plans fora the medium and long-term development of the country, the post-CoVid development?
    We know that the difference between some models can be hundreds of millions of dollars; and that ALL governments have a system of pricing life which they use for the allocation of scarce resources. What is the model in Barbados?
    There is a game of smoke and mirrors, in which our academic economists remain silent, and government and retired (ie DeLisle Worrell) have nothing to say. Par t of the conspiracy are the media who continue to go to the same people who say the same things over and over again.
    The result – and it is intended – is that ordinarily intelligent people go around talking nonsense about foreign reserves, which they do not understand, but which the t rained minds and politicians say are a good metric; and, more recently, economic voodoo about fiscal space.
    We cannot get a proper economic debate because it is the continuing reproduction of mediocrity: professors who continue to teach from their 1960s and 70s notes; younger students who do post-graduate work supervised by these same out of touch professors; and then these young people graduate and become academics in their own right and the vicious circle continues.
    These young people also have an interest in perpetuating these false economic doctrines since their professional reputations rest on their supposed knowledge of these out-of-date doctrines and, by definition, to deny the legitimacy of these doctrines will be to undermine their very academic status. Turkeys do not vote for Xmas.


  42. Davidt
    I am confused on what to believe is an honest opinion put forward by the professional class in Barbados. Is this the same Dr.Naithram who was appointed a member of the Central Bank Board? .I am not doubting his integrity, but the Government appoints the members of the Board. Will a person say something negative about a government policy if they are on a government board? In light of Mr.Franklyn saying he was offered a top post by this majority government, should it not follow a logical conclusion that the government wants to neuter all persons in important positions.Eg Head of BES,Head Of BWU,Head of NUPW etc. Just asking for a friend


  43. Barbados’ ability to attract foreign investors is still at risk.

    And Minister of International Business and Industry Ronald Toppin isn’t happy.

    The minister announced yesterday that the island’s fate was hanging in the balance as it could be facing a possible financial downgrade next week.

    He was speaking via Zoom during the launch of the Barbados International Business Association’s Global Business Week 2020.


  44. @ Lest we forget

    He was a student until recently. Before him there was Straughn.


  45. He was a student until recently. Before him there was Straughn.
    But @Hal he has a Phd so he must be an expert and everything he says must be true. Right?

    Is this the same Dr.Naithram who was appointed a member of the Central Bank Board? .I am not doubting his integrity, but the Government appoints the members of the Board. Will a person say something negative about a government policy if they are on a government board?

    Nope. the hand that feeds is not often bitten. In a country the size of Bim there tends to be very few dissenting voices because the govt directly or indirectly puts $ in pockets. The good fellow in question is also employed at teh local govt funded university so I am not sure how impartial his voice might be.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading