The HUG

Several interpretations have been applied Bob Marley’s Man to Man song.

Man to man is so unjust, children:
Ya dont know who to trust.
Your worst enemy could be your best friend,
And your best friend your worse enemy.
Some will eat and drink with you,
Then behind them su-su pon you.
Only your friend know your secrets,
So only he could reveal it.
And who the cap fit, let them wear it!

This blogmaster continues to marvel at how humankind despite self labelling as being the most advance of the animal specie behave as primitive in interactions as a wild animal.

As traditional values like honesty, respect, integrity, credibility to list a few give way to a people happy to be anchored in nothingness – so too the way of the world we live. A walk through many school yards bar a few tells a tale of what the morrow portends.

Barbadians have joined others where the ability to reason and apply logical thought is being trumped by political and irrelevant considerations. Even if it means national proprieties must be ignored. The inability to reason is not deliberate, it is derivative of educated ignorance.

Our inability to demonstrate love, forgiveness are character traits in the modern era is a waning behaviour.

The reaction to the ‘HUG’ given to Amber Guyger by the brother of murder victim Botham Jean makes for an interesting case study. The Black judge that approved the action also hugged Guyger as has attracted the ire of an ism crazy public. A simple act of love and forgiveness has been interpreted in so many ways it was not meant to be.

Several times the blogmaster has issued the refrain that all the world needs is more love. It seems the ability to demonstrate love and forgiveness has gotten lost in the translation of surviving in today’s rate race. Could it be the ‘HUG’ becomes a seminal moment in time?

 

330 comments

  • What the media never seem to discuss is that all of Trump past immoral acts were done before he was President and which goes against the grain of the Constitution to be called impeachable offenses
    The latest round of him talking about Biden and seeking information to discredit Biden also would not reach the threshold to be called an impeachable offense
    Also hardened proof along with facts must be found that Trump engaged and willingly and knowingly used “false” information from outside sources to discredit Biden and even that information cannot be used as sufficient to impeach Trump
    The merrygo round circus would continue
    However the next election would have the final word onTrump and not the media or the Democratics
    But the collective voices of the people
    There comes a time in life when best be it that sleeping dogs lie

    Like

  • @Ewart Archer

    Earlier this year in Minneapolis, an African American cop who shot a middle class white woman dead as she walked toward his patrol car was sentenced to twelve and a half years.
    The woman had called the cops to her home, and the cop’s decision to open fire was hard to explain
    because she was unarmed and he had a partner with him (Quote)

    Wrong. He was not Afro-American, but East African (I think Somali), which makes a big difference. He was also Muslim and the woman Australian.

    Like

  • @ David

    It is not to the advantage of the Dems to have a long drawn out impeachment. This is why they have not brought it to a vote on the floor and it is also why it has been said that failure to comply is a sign of guilt and is impeachable. Now these are people who since 2016 have been talking about impeachment. After there was shown to be no Russian collusion, there was talk about impeachment for obstruction and Nadler has been busy since then having hearings into the Mueller investigations seeking to impeach Trump.. There is a fishing expedition seeking to find some excuse to impeach. Mueller’s investigation was also a fishing one seeking to find wrong doing. Listening to the main stream media, you wouldn’t know that the Dems had released texts showing that “Crystal clear no quid pro quo” statement made by Trump. Schiff has been shown to be a liar concerning the whistle blower . The Washington Post had to admit that Schiff lied and (WP) are no fans of Trump..
    Any one who can reason logically must ask why are all of these things happening to one person?.

    Like

  • Maybe the brother can asked the court for the forgiveness of the assailant/s who killed the witness who spoke in his brother defense
    Dont see no need to havea trial if the wheels of justice now runs on Forgiveness and bible thumping

    Like

  • David
    October 6, 2019 7:52 AM

    @John
    We are trying to have a sensible conversation.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Both Pelosi and Biden are showing their age!!

    It is obvious.

    Trump is getting up there too but seems to be ageless for the moment.

    … and it drives some folks crazy!!

    Hilary will run again!!

    Chelsea may be the VP!!

    Here she is giving candidates advice!!

    It was obvious from a while ago

    Like

  • A key witness in this case has been shot dead. Interesting.

    Liked by 1 person

  • How does the left/DEMS counter this?

    Like

  • A neighbor of Botham Jean who was a key witness in the murder trial of Amber Guyger has been shot dead in Dallas.
    Joshua Brown, 28, was gunned down outside an apartment complex in the city’s Medical District around 10.30 pm on Friday.
    He was rushed to nearby Parkland Memorial Hospital, where he died from his injuries.
    Witnesses say they heard several gunshots and saw a silver sedan speeding out of the apartment complex’s parking lot shortly after. (Quote|)

    Liked by 1 person

  • A second whistleblower has surfaced.

    Like

  • @ David
    Seems also second hand information.

    Like

  • @Dr. Lucas

    It is the ability to validate the information provided.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Hal Austin

    You are wrong, again.

    Mohamed Noor, the black cop in the Minneapolis case, is properly described as African American. He was born on Somalia, but was brought to the United States as a small child, naturalized as a US citizen, and educated in US schools in Chicago and Minneapolis. After graduation from college, he became a police officer.

    Many foreign born blacks brought up from childhood in the US are “African-American” in every sense of the word. There is no “big difference” because he was born on Somalia.

    Liked by 1 person

  • MR TRUMP IS ADVISED TO READ THE STORY OF HAMAN AND MORDECAI IN THE BOOK OF ESTHER

    HE IS ADVISED TO SAVOR THE TRUTH OF THE ADVICE GIVEN TO JEHOSOPHAT IN 2 CHRONICLES 20:17A

    ye shall not need to fight in this battle: set yourselves, stand ye still, and see the salvation of the Lord with you

    Like

  • Robert Lucas
    Perhaps you will think again of Trumpf’s idea of stamping out corruption!He’s a criminal and so are his children and ‘termite’ son in law.

    https://crooksandliars.com/2019/10/corruption-family-value-trumpworld-am-joy

    Like

  • Many foreign born blacks brought up from childhood in the US are “African-American” in every sense of the word. There is no “big difference” because he was born on Somalia.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Tell that to Al Sharpton.

    That was a big issue for him regarding Obama.

    In fact, his position was parodied in song.

    Like

  • Kamala Harris has the same issue!!

    Is she an African American?

    Like

  • GP
    The supine JA who proves the old bajan edict that book sense ent common sense.

    Liked by 1 person

  • It isn’t Trump that has the DEMs worried.

    It is Barr!!

    No holds are Barred!!

    Like

  • @ Gabriel October 6, 2019 9:58 AM

    Let me repeat again for your benefit: Try being objective and view things dispassionately. You are being overly . emotional.

    Like

  • Night runs till day catches it!!

    It is amazing to watch it unfold!!

    The DEMs will not beat Trump in the 2020 election so impeachment is the course followed.

    It will collapse like a house of cards.

    Name the single policy the DEMs have articulated that will improve their country?

    They have none.

    All they cling to is impeach Trump.

    It is almost as though they have been struck blind and do not realise what they are doing!!

    They are stuck in the fog of night they create.

    Like

  • John

    There have been political squabbles in New York between the West Indian immigrant community and native-born blacks. Jews have played one group against the other.

    Please do not muddy the waters with these details.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Keep hugging and coddling stinking racists and watchnyou and yours suffer the consequences.

    If you are majority Black country YOU have the power to DESTROY all racists and their evil racism….and if ya nasty bribetaking leaders get in the way, dismantle them too

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1320743231288887/permalink/2962298157133378/

    Like

  • @ GP October 6, 2019 9:55 AM
    I was forced to dust off a copy of the king James’ version to check out your comment. Very apt I found it.

    Like

  • de pedantic Dribbler

    David Mr Blogmaster I believe that no discussion on politics – Bajan or US – is any longer based on a “sensible” standard by rabid partisans or biased fans…it is all about an upside down virtual life of alternative facts…..Your blog discussions are a micro dot of the weirdness that goes on…like these last examples:

    —–“Stop being emotional. Never allow emotion to interject itself because you dislike some one..”

    The POTUS angrily tweeted that a Senator was a “pompous ass”, he called a leading congreesman a “low life” and “treasonous” and there are THOUSANDS of other instances where he emotively exploded on others simply because he DISLIKED what they said …YET in our ‘perfect’ upside down world ANYONE who criticizes this man is deemed to have a mental hated filled syndrome of instabilty and dislike!

    —–“You don’t [know] why he with held funds. […] and he can with hold and give no reason or a thousand different reasons.. Other presidents have done similar things and there have no problems.”

    How can we have SENSIBLE discourse when deliberate MISSTATEMENTS are mixed with facts as a NEW fact…a lie added to a truth makes the resulting complete statement a LIE…not a truth!

    We ABSOLUTELY know why the funds were withheld…and we know that because all agreements and business details had been concluded leading up to and after the approval at Congress. The ONLY outstanding issue was Guiliani and Trump’s AGENDA. Lets be charitiable and presume we dont know what that agenda was…but then we MUST ask the question: what additional matters to the benefit of the US could a POTUS and his PERSONAL envoy be exploring !

    —–“Congress, like in the Mueller affair is seeking to find some cause for impeachment….”

    Congress HAS a reason for impeachment…unlike the Mueller investigation… here they are seeking the “evidence” to validate ….. The lawyers say this: “Article II, Section 4, says the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” […] the term “bribery” is not defined there or elsewhere in the constitutional text. Some of Trump’s defenders have taken advantage of that silence by attempting to apply the standard in the modern federal criminal bribery statute, arguing that impeachment for bribery is off the table unless there is a quid pro quo. They claim that Trump’s conduct falls short of that standard because he did not explicitly link the withheld aid to the requested investigation of a political rival.” ….. “In fact, Trump’s conduct almost certainly satisfies the modern statutory standard for bribery. […], a quid pro quo “need not be stated in express terms; corrupt actors are seldom so clumsy, and the law may not be evaded through winks and nods.” We have little doubt that a prosecutor would be able to establish a quid pro quo based on what was said on the call and the surrounding facts and context”

    —–“Remember from day one there have been threats of impeachment being made against him. Why would there be such threats? “

    There were such threats because (1) the members of the campaign of the sitting POTUS had been caught interacting with a foreign power and there were concerns there was DIRECT intervention in a US election, (2) the POTUS was accused of obstructing justice in coercing the lawful investigations of (a) his Nat Sec advisor (b) the FBI/Mueller campaign investigation and for petty political reasons that the man was a pussy-grabbing cad!

    Just like the petty political reason that getting oral sex in the WH was so morally unacceptable…but they caught Clinton on perjury on that so OK!

    —-“There was even talk and an attempt at making the result of the 2016 election invalid […] Just ask yourself why? Why are there constant leaks of supposedly confidential matters? Put your animus towards the man to one side and analyze things.”

    The electoral college folly was nonsense. You cannot change the rules AFTER you lose the contest so that was BS then and to repeat it now is further absurdity…

    The leak trope is also BS …under ALL previous admins leaking was a problem. The Obama admin went after and prosecuted leaks (TOO) agressively…according to media his admin “prosecut[ed] more people under that law for leaking sensitive information to the public than all previous administrations combined.”

    The concerns of right thinking people are not based on animus…they are based on his disturbing disregard for the rule of law and shameless attempts to enrich his empire and empower his political success by misusing the office of the presidency.

    There can be no ‘sensible discourse when one side lies, obfuscates, uses personal insults and thumbs their nose at the law (let’s shoot aliens crossing the border in their legs) and commenters simply REFUSE to deal with the reality of this man’s dangerous behaviour.

    **Some perspective on presidential lies: *Fact checkers (in Dec 2017) noted that Obama told 18 separate lies in 8 years in office…this POTUS had told 103 after his 10 MONTH in office… STOP there one moment….. Based on that average that’s 2 per year for one president and 124 per year for the other.….. * But the REALITY is much worst: in 2018 he exploded to an average of 200 falsehoods/misstatements/LIES per month…at one point running the media ragged at 500 per month. *

    In May 2019 the media published an updated list of misleading POTUS remarks: it was over 5,000 or 6 per DAY since inauguration… OMG *”if you like your doctor you can keep him/her” was ONE of 18 for Obama compared to a man running 6 LIES per DAY!

    And yet we have commenters taking this man on his word like ‘of course I didn’t push a quid pro quo’…and worst yet, despite all dat still 32% of US electorate finds this man “honest and trustworthy”.

    Welcome to the new Upside-Down Alternative fact world!

    Liked by 1 person

  • David October 6, 2019 12:39 AM

    A sobbing Guyger, under questioning by her attorney, expressed remorse for the killing, saying, “I feel like at terrible person, I feel like a piece of crap” because of the shooting. “I wish he was the one with the gun and he killed me,” Guyger said. “I never wanted to take an innocent person’s life.”

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    David,

    Stop shitting in public!

    Anyone can cry crocodile tears to elicit sympathy from the hearers. The tell here was her defence strategy. A remorseful person who so wished she could give her life instead of the victim would not have mounted such a defence. She could have pleaded “Not guilty” to murder but “Guilty” to manslaughter and thrown herself on the mercy of the Court which had really broad discretion in sentencing.

    This strategy suggests that she was sorry she had to suffer the consequences of her actions. Easy to cry under those circumstances.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/01/us/amber-guyger-trial-castle-doctrine/index.html

    PS. Why are you folks worried about the murder of the key witness? The Dallas Police Department is on the case.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Get the stinking racists out of Barbados and the Caribbean and if the bribetaking black governments and lawyers don’t like that…get them gone too. Racism is a curse and those who practice, enable, condone and profit from this curse are all blighted.

    Like

  • This is not going away, send a message to the evil black leaders who love to enable racism to fill their greedy pockets, be aware, racism in Barbados and the Caribbean GOTTA GO….or YOU WILL…

    ” ASSOCIATED PRESS
    A message has clearly been sent.

    Joshua Brown, a key witness who testified for the prosecution on Tuesday in the trial of killer cop Amber Guyger, was fatally shot outside of his apartment building in Dallas on Friday night.
    The neighbor of Botham Jean, who was murdered by Guyger, Brown’s body was found on the ground, his body riddled with bullets, the Dallas Morning News reported.

    He was taken to Parkland Memorial Hospital, where he died from his injuries.

    According to civil rights attorney S. Lee Merritt, Esq., who is representing the Jean family, Brown’s immediate family said he was shot in his mouth and chest after Merritt was told the young man was shot in his back.

    “We will have to await the autopsy to be sure,” he wrote on Twitter Saturday night.”

    Like

  • @Dee Word

    Good comment, we live in an age where bombast is the new norm of civility. Looking for leadership from the educated among us also is a pipe dream. Appreciate if you can comment on the lead blog, our job is done here.

    Like

  • Get RID of racists and racism in black majority countries….even if ya gotta bury the perpetrators and the animals who enable them for monetary gain.

    “On Facebook, Merritt wrote that Brown’s execution “underscores the reality of the black experience in America.”

    “Brown lived in constant fear that he could be the next victim of gun violence…Brown deserves the same justice he sought to ensure the Jean family.”

    Witnesses reportedly told police they heard several gunshots and saw a silver four-door sedan speeding away from the parking lot.

    Brown 28, testified last week about the night of Sept. 6, 2018, when Amber Guyger, a white Dallas Police officer, entered Jean’s apartment allegedly thinking it was hers and shot him dead, believing the black certified public account was an intruder.
    The diverse jury, mostly made of women and people of color, found Guyger— who has a history of making racist remarks on social media—guilty and then sentenced her to 10 years in prison for the murder. She will be up for parole in five years.

    Ponder that.

    Brown was a former athlete turned entrepreneur, according to Merritt, who is working closely with his family in seeking justice.

    On Saturday, the lead prosecutor in the Guyger case Jason Hermus, applauded Brown’s decision to come forward.

    “He bravely came forward to testify when others wouldn’t, ” he told the Morning News. “If we had more people like him, we would have a better world.”

    Like

  • @ David October 6, 2019 9:32 AM

    There are no high crimes ,ergo no grounds for impeachment, but if one keeps talking about impeaching after a time one believes what one is saying. Like Goebbels said repeat the accusation enough and most people will believe anything. look, the thrust of Trump’s effort was and is about the investigation into what took place in 2016 and he has all right to pursue them and if you want to believe that there wasn’t some quid pro quo with Hunter Biden and Ukraine as well as in China ,you are free to feel so. Trump wanted to pursue it but Ryan Paul for some reason wouldn’t proceed with the investigations. Like the Mueller affair you will hear all sorts of stories emanating from the media. It seems that Trump can’t fart in the White House with out the media knowing about it. The media is pissed off with Trump because he doesn’t give two-hoots about them. The media seem to think they can direct government policy. no one voted for them.

    Like

  • @ de pedantic Dribbler October 6, 2019 10:37 AM

    You are being emotional. Your animus oozes out like the venom from a rabid dog.

    Like

  • @Dr.Lucas

    Could care less if Trump is impeached. His pedigree as a good person is suspect especially as it relates to coloured people. Do not like as a person. As a president he has a leadership style the world can do without. We will see how it plays out.

    Like

  • @ Ewart Archer

    Many foreign born blacks brought up from childhood in the US are “African-American” in every sense of the word. There is no “big difference” because he was born on Somalia.(Quote)

    Your obstinacy is remarkable. Stop contradicting yourself. He is a Somali, or at best a Somali-American. Do you remember Jesse Jackson’s remarks, for which he apologised, when Obama became president? So, if you are of Caribbean heritage and black, what are you? A West Indian-Afro-American, or are you simply an Afro-American and your West Indian heritage goes by the window?
    You must spend your time learning and not being arrogant and wrong.

    Like

  • #labels

    #isms

    #blacks

    #caucasions

    Like

  • @ dr robert lucas
    robert lucasOctober 6, 2019 10:33 AM

    @ GP October 6, 2019 9:55 AM
    I was forced to dust off a copy of the king James’ version to check out your comment. Very apt I found it
    .
    IT IS ALWAYS NICE TO CAUSE/ENCOURAGE SOME ONE TO READ THE WORD OF GOD

    WHEN A SCHOLAR LIKE YOU CAN SEE THAT MY REFERENCES WERE PERTINENT IS A GREAT PLEASURE, SIR

    OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS I HAVE STRIVED TO OBEY THE INJUNCTION OF 2 TIMOTHY 2:15 TO RIGHTLY DIVIDE THE WORD OF TRUTH AS I SEEK TO GROW IN GRACE AND IN THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AS TAUGHT IN 2 PETER 3:18

    BUT MR TRUMP JUST NEEDS TO BE STILL AND WATCH THE SAME GOD THAT WON A GREAT VICTORY FOR KING JEHOSOPHAT AGAINST VERY GREAT ODDS PROTECT HIM FROM THE MONGRELS IN CONGRESS

    Like

  • @ David October 6, 2019 11:04 AM

    You are allowing sentiment to be your guide. Trump has done more for blacks than a lot of other presidents. Ask yourself why a lot of blacks support Trump. I try to read as many sources as possible. Do you remember what some whites said about Mia ? Do you feel he should have open borders? Remember how Barbadians got on towards Guyanese not too long ago ? What is the difference ?Since when is the pedigree of a politician a bench mark for judgement? President Johnson was a known racist but he ensured that there were equal rights amendments for blacks although he, personally did believe in equal rights; but it was a political win for him. Kennedy who is so beloved by blacks wasn’t very friendly towards blacks. You might not like the man; his personal life is no worse than Kennedy’s . Both Robert and John Kennedy had affairs with the same actress. So if you want to disparage Trump , you should also disparage women and men in high positions in Barbados whose actions could do with some improvement. As the Bible says judge not, least thee be judged. I try not to pass judgement on others. I feel that a person has the right to live how he/she wants, once others are not affected. I don’t hold any high ground where others are concerned. One thing I will say for Trump he isn’t a hypocrite. ,he tells it as it is. There will soon be a host of whistle blowers coming forth. Just wait and see. He will be impeached and if he wants to he can run as an independent candidate in 2020 and he will win. I predicted that he would have won in 2016. The world has changed and people do not want politicians( only here in Barbados) who do not practice what their preach.

    Like

  • Hal Austin

    You are projecting.

    You seem to know very little about the United States and you understand less.

    That is not my problem. My knowledge is first hand. In fact, I lived in Minneapolis while studying at the University of Minnesota.

    Like

  • Correction: personally did believe in equal Should read Did not believe in

    Like

  • @ Ewart Archer

    I do not even know where the US is. As to university, I did not go to school. Answer the questions.

    Like

  • There are none so blind as those who cannot think for themselves,those who rely on a concoction of stories written thousands of years ago and seem so happy in their stupidity.As David says I’m done here too.

    Like

  • robert lucasOctober 6, 2019 9:25 AM

    @ David
    Seems also second hand information.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The fact that information is second hand does not mean it is not true.

    Raw intelligence is usually just a report of what the agent is told by sources both reliable and unreliable. Just as with the “Steele Dossier” that is just the beginning of an investigation by those whose job it actually is to do so.

    But Trump and Ghouliani both admitted the substance of what was done. The motives can be disputed but if we strip away our bias we would see more clearly. The text messages, if taken in their entirety, show a pattern. Also the fact that there was an initial attempt to cover it up conveys a consciousness of wrongdoing. And Trump was unable to name a single investigation of corruption outside of the Biden case. It never even crossed their minds. Biden was targeted for the simple fact that he is a political opponent.

    Now, I do not find it good that Biden’s son took the position on the board and that his father was involved in the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor would raise suspicions. It is my understanding that he was carrying out the policy of the IMF, the EU and the US government but still he should never have put himself in that position. If I were him I would say “investigate away” and continue with my campaign. The press has already investigated the Bidens and the evidence is out there. I hope the desperate leader of the Ukraine will not manufacture evidence in order to gain Trump’s support. And that is the danger of it all. Shall the desperate be forced to create an alternative reality?

    John,

    You have the gall to say that Democrats aren’t used to being investigated??????????? Was Hillary Clinton not investigated?????? Was not her husband investigated? Was not a current senator charged and tried?

    I feel for the likes of you.

    PS: How many times will the “fake news” force a live admission out of Trump and Ghouliani. How many times will their stories change? That is the hallmark of a liar.”

    Even Tucker Carston admits there is no good way to spin this. The only moot point he says, is whether or not it is an impeachable offence. Of course, he thinks it isn’t but as to the deeds of the president and the motives behind them, he has given up the fight.

    Who would believe that Tucker Carlston would be smarter than you lot?

    Liked by 1 person

  • There will soon be a host of whistle blowers coming forth.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    There is only one whistleblower, Donald Trump!!

    All the political hysteria is directed at stopping him from blowing the whistle and calling time.

    The swamp know its days in its present form are numbered and is just trying to prolong its existence by ending Trump’s.

    It does not have a chance!!

    Experience has shown that whenever Trump is thought to be cornered and down he just gets stronger.

    Better spend time understanding why or looking for another swamp to create!!

    Like

  • The fact that information is second hand does not mean it is not true.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    It just means it is inadmissible!!

    All the investigations in the world won’t change that fact.

    Like

  • Was Hillary Clinton not investigated?????? Was not her husband investigated?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++

    No, she wasn’t!!

    There wasn’t any need to investigate Slick Willy because the stain was there to see.

    He got caught with his pants down!!

    https://nypost.com/2018/11/13/how-monica-lewinsky-finally-noticed-that-stain-on-her-dress/

    Didn’t need any investigation because there was first hand evidence.

    If these two criminals were investigated you should be able to tell us all about White Water and the Clinton Foundation!!

    But you can’t

    Like

  • If a “whistleblower” had come forward and said they were told by somebody that some intern had something going with Slick Willy, Monica Lewinsky would be an unknown today and Clinton probably would not have been impeached!!!

    What was he impeached for, do you even know?

    Liked by 1 person

  • Trump’s response is “put up or shut up”.

    Call a vote and lets go from there!!

    That drives then nuts because they know that he knows they won’t!!

    So they probably will!!!

    If they do or don’t and keep on the impeachment trail, all he has to do is say in 2020 to the voters, look, the DEMs spent all of 4 years doing nothing for you!!

    Even the Tax Cut which stimulated the economy not a single DEM supported it!!

    It is like getting to a final exam having done no studying!!!

    Like

  • Ewart

    You are totally correct. I was borned in Barbados to black bajan perents who became American citizens.
    My parents and I were all officially refer to as African Americans.

    there are no document that refer to us as west Indians. In the USA if you are black you are officially refered to as African American

    Like

  • Rober L

    Alot of blacks like trump? Most people wouldnt call 8% of the black vote a liking for trump!

    Like

  • JohnOctober 6, 2019 1:44 PM

    The fact that information is second hand does not mean it is not true.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    It just means it is inadmissible!!

    All the investigations in the world won’t change that fact.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    But when it is verified, THAT EVIDENCE becomes totally admissible. Are you trying to say that if I a minor child tells her mother that she was raped that the police should not investigate? And when they verify that second hand account by means of DNA evidence and severe bruising that evidence is inadmissible?????

    That is why I cannot bother with you. I know you are smarter than that and you are just making up crap. Very dishonest..

    Liked by 2 people

  • Are you trying to say that if I a minor child tells her mother that she was raped that the police should not investigate?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    That’s not a second or third hand account!!

    If the minor child told the mother that her friend told her that she knows somebody who told her she had been raped, should the mother call the police to investigate?

    This is common sense!!

    Like

  • The discussion is descending to the ridiculous.

    Liked by 2 people

  • John 2,

    There is always a token black or two at the rallies. Great black support! Facts don’t matter to Trumpians. It is the main tenet of their philosophy as revealed by the prophet Ghouliani, and I quote – “Truth isn’t truth!”

    PS. The black supporters are the f-ed up ones like Kanye West. They are the ones who would eat the shit and call it chocolate just to be in the white man’s good books. We all know the type.

    Like

  • John,

    That is not what happened here and you know it. You are a very dishonest person.

    Liked by 1 person

  • There are (were) categories in the US census for West Indians and for Guyanese. As someone asked, is Kamala Harris an Afro-Caribbean? Referring to all black people of African origin as Afro-Americans s a default position. have seen Caribbean people in the UK referred to as Afro-American. I laughed my head off. Some people just do not like saying black. Others call all of us Africans.
    It is a crisis of identity for all of us. How can my brother, sisters and mother be Afro-Americans and I am what?

    Like

  • John

    Yes. She should call the police to investigate.
    That’s is the normal and wise procedure, especially if the suspected rape victim is a child.

    Like

  • From the time Trump delivered the transcript it made the whistle blower irrelevant because everybody knew more than the whistleblower.

    Trump delivered a first hand account of the conversation.

    The whistle blower became Trump.

    He blew the whistle on the whistleblower!!

    Schiff then had to lie.

    Like

  • It is impossible for us to have a proper argument with these Trumpians. They just make stuff up and argue dishonestly. I despise Donald Trump for the despicable lowlife that he has shown himself to be ON LIVE TELEVISION but the day I make up stuff to convict him I would not like myself.

    Liked by 2 people

  • “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody…….”

    I wouldn’t want anybody to say that about me!

    Like

  • October 6, 2019 4:49 PM

    John
    Yes. She should call the police to investigate.
    That’s is the normal and wise procedure, especially if the suspected rape victim is a child.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The investigation is of the child who provided second or third hand evidence.

    The police have to get the child to tell them the name of the friend.

    The friend then has to give up the other friend.

    By the time the police determine if this is a Nancy story and a perpetrator is identified the evidence to prosecute the perpetrator if any, is gone.

    The Police investigate complaints.

    They take statements!!

    Remember the lady in the Top Rock Service Station?

    No statement, no complaint.

    There has to be an element of specificity.

    Like

  • So Trump says to the House, vote on it, until you do don’t waste my time!!

    Like

  • John

    How do you know the rapist would be gone.

    The point is if if it is reported to the police then the police would investigate and verify if there was a rape or not.
    IF there was a rape (as third had reported) then the police would try to identify and capture the alleged rapist.

    Like

  • John,

    Schiff was dramatizing it. That he should not have done. But I heard the contents of that transcript. I immediately latched on to the word “though” and waited to see if anybody else would have found that to be the clincher. Sure enough they all did!

    I don’t follow anybody. I come to my own conclusions.

    Trump knows you lot will follow him into hell. His tactic was to release the transcript tell you lot it meant nothing and then put the idea of violence and civil war into his heavily armed mob. If you think he wouldn’t prefer a civil war rather than to lose the next election and face some jail you have not been watching.

    Liked by 1 person

  • john

    Seems to me that part of you think rump is guilty and you are just looking for an “out” for him.

    Like

  • Donna
    October 6, 2019 5:19 PM

    John,
    Schiff was dramatizing it. That he should not have done.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Schiff is supposed to be the chief of Police.

    He has prejudged the case.

    There is only one logical outcome for him!!

    Resign or be moved!!

    Like

  • Oops, that’s two … same result though!!

    Like

  • @ Ewart Archer
    “Many foreign born blacks brought up from childhood in the US are “African-American” in every sense of the word. There is no “big difference” because he was born on Somalia.(Quote)
    Your obstinacy is remarkable. Stop contradicting yourself. He is a Somali, or at best a Somali-American. Do you remember Jesse Jackson’s remarks, for which he apologised, when Obama became president? So, if you are of Caribbean heritage and black, what are you? A West Indian-Afro-American, or are you simply an Afro-American and your West Indian heritage goes by the window?
    “You must spend your time learning and not being arrogant and wrong.”

    I wonder if Mr Arrogant and Wrong gone and took his own ignorant /dumb advice.

    Like

  • No John.

    He is not Chief of Police. Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. Even so policemen, after getting hold of some of the evidence, always come to some conclusion and search for further evidence to substantiate it. They present that evidence. The prosecutor takes it and argues it and it is left for the jury to decide.

    And so it shall be with Trump.

    It was stupid of Schiff to dramatize it. He has given you lot a talking point. He should have let the evidence speak for itself.

    If you have finished your pretzel imitation I shall close the conversation. Watching intelligent black man contort themselves for a white racist makes me too depressed. That is what I mean when I say ENOUGH OF YOU. I literally can’t take anymore today.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @ Donna October 6, 2019 4:52 PM

    ” I despise Donald Trump for the despicable lowlife that he has shown himself to be ON LIVE TELEVISION but the day I make up stuff to convict him I would not like myself.”

    you despise the man. At least you are honest . I neither hate or like him. I always knew he was kind of boorish, but that’s his style. I can see why women would despise him. you made a point about a though, in the end analysis he did not used the quid pro quo. As I have said, it is obvious some talk did go on about a quid pro quo, but from the evidence available and according to the DOJ, the discussions might be unethical, but there weren’t criminal. All of this is a mountain being made of a mole hill. what do you think happens when leaders of countries talk to one another? there is always a quid pro quo. for example country X wants some pressure put on freedom fighters in country Y and country Y wants some tanks. The tanks are used as a bargaining chip in getting pressure placed on Y to put pressure on the freedom (a bad example, but it illustrate the point). In the case of the Ukraine McCabe and others instigated a plot to oust a duly elected president. Whether you despise him or not, the man was duly elected. lots of lies were invented and the man was subjected to a two-year inquisition which turned to be a witch hunt. he has all rights to get to the bottom of the conspiracy. Ralph Jemmott had an article in todays’ paper, he seems incensed at the fact that Barr is investigating what went on in the so-called Russia-gate fiasco, Barr is just doing his job and would be remiss if he did not seek to bring the wrong doers to account. This whole impeachment affair is trying to deflect the reports by Barr and the Inspector General into the nefarious doings of Comey, Clapper, Brennan and company. The purpose of the probe is to ensure that the intelligence services never again seek to deposed a duly elected president. and to bring to heel under civilian control. No one elected them.

    Like

  • Correction:” I neither hate nor like him.” instead of or.

    Like

  • @ john2 October 6, 2019 5:44 PM

    You should also advise Hal Asstin the stubborn Afro-Caribbean ‘English’ mule that Somalia is also part of Africa.

    With American citizenship any African-born person has the right to refer to him or herself as African-American.

    What would he call a child born in Soweto South Africa but naturalized in the USA or even one born in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or Mauritania now holding American citizenship?

    Liked by 1 person

  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @Donna…kudos re your above commentaries …I am in complete harmony with you re: “It is impossible for us to have a proper argument with these Trumpians. They just make stuff up and argue dishonestly.”

    I really don’t like nor dislike POTUS … rather indifferent to him and hate his behaviour. If this man acted in a civil and decorous manner he would be an absolute shoo in for re-election and he woukd not have lost in the mid terms.

    He is a disgusting cad….so it cannot be seen as a foregone conclusion that the American electorate will reelect a man who lies daily to the tune of 6 fibs per day.

    And to the Doc directly: Can a man who has soent as much time as you in academic pursuits be so utterly ‘mind addled’ to refuse to understand that when political leaders seek quid pro quo it is done for the benefit of the NATION and not their PERSONAL benefit.

    When the US sends $400 mil in military aid to Ukraine there is a DEFINITE quid pro quo INCLUDING indirect things like NATO joint exercises in the country/region; training of military forces by US officials; support of NATO and of course buying US armaments etc etc …you DO NOT have an envoy asking about investigations into political rivals…nor you DO NOT mention those political opponents during a convo with a country’s leader and in the same discourse talk about the aid funds. You JUST DO NOT!

    If you find that acceptable then so be it….

    I don’t find it acceptable that Biden’s son was getting $600,000 as a Board member from a company in a country with which his VP father was heavily involved and where corruption was a major problem…

    Nor is it acceptable that MsTrump-Kushner is getting brand copyright approvals from a country where it is known to be quite difficult to get those types of approvals and in which her Pres father is deeply involved with trade negotiations …nor is it acceptable the business dealings of Trump sons in Dubai and other mid-East locales .

    But BOTTOM line…the Pres of the USA cannot and should NEVER be talking about ANY investigation related to US political figurss with a foreign leader…that’s an impeachable offense ..plain and simple.

    Like

  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @Donna, to your crystal clear point about the dishonesty of discourse eith these POTUS groupies.

    You said:“I despise Donald Trump for the despicable lowlife that he has shown himself to be ON LIVE TELEVISION …”

    And on cue with the misstated alternative facts your statement is now “…you despise the man. At least you are honest”

    Same folks who took a playacting, paraphrasing Committee Chair’s words to twist them into the stupidity of the President’s tweet that that the man is treasonous…

    This same POTUS who is reported as telling his Russian adversaries in his infamous 2017 Oval office meeting that “he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 US election”.

    The president of the freaking US whose Intel services, FB officials and a host of others confirmed that Russia had interfered with the US elections is telling the SAME Russians ‘oh don’t worry bout dat, we interfere in other people’s elections all the time’ is now calling someone a TRAITOR !

    Welcome to Virtual Reality zone 52, home of the UpsideDown Irrelevent Truth world !

    Like

  • Miller
    Have you not notice that I do not say a pleasant word to that arrogant, think he know it all, pomPus (sy) jack Asstin

    Like

  • Seems like the KKK played black peoplecfor fools in this case
    The brother forgive her
    Then the key witness is shot

    Liked by 1 person

  • Donna
    October 6, 2019 6:48 PM

    No John.
    He is not Chief of Police. Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. Even so policemen, after getting hold of some of the evidence, always come to some conclusion and search for further evidence to substantiate it. They present that evidence. The prosecutor takes it and argues it and it is left for the jury to decide.
    And so it shall be with Trump.
    It was stupid of Schiff to dramatize it. He has given you lot a talking point. He should have let the evidence speak for itself.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Schiff is the ranking member on the House Select Intelligence Committee, which is tasked with conducting inquiries related to Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

    Ranking means most senior member, el jefe de la policia if you like.

    He has prejudged the case.

    He is so determined to show Trump’s collusion that he is prepared even to lie.

    It is being revealed he may even have set the whole mess in motion!!

    He isn’t in some drama play for which he gets points for acting and dramatizing an event.

    He is not paid to do that.

    What is that joker going to do when Barr cuts loose on Biden for corruption in Ukraine leading up to the 2016 election.

    This is common sense!!

    Straightforward!!

    … and I am enjoying every last moment of it as he squirms and wriggles and lies his way out of a seat in Congress.

    He and the DEMs have a real problem.

    Donald Trump and his team won the 2016 election fair and square.

    Mueller said there was no collusion!!

    The deck was stacked against Trump and still he won going away and laughing at Hilary and the DEMs!!

    Like

  • Don’t underestimate the power of the KKK in America

    Like

  • SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @DavidOctober 6, 2019 6:01 AM “Christians are of the disposition to forgive. ”

    Really?

    I am a Christian, and i can’t say that i am disposed to readily forgive. That is the truth.

    Too ready to forgive and the sinner thinks that you don’t mind being sinned against, and are all too ready and willing to sin against you again.

    That is not for me.

    Like

  • RE @DavidOctober 6, 2019 6:01 AM “Christians are of the disposition to forgive. ”

    Really?

    I am a Christian, and i can’t say that i am disposed to readily forgive. That is the truth.

    Too ready to forgive and the sinner thinks that you don’t mind being sinned against, and are all too ready and willing to sin against you again.

    That is not for me.

    888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

    BUT WHAT DOES JESUS SAY ABOUT THIS EVEN TO THOSE IN THEIR SEVENTIES WHO GO CHURCH EVERY SUNDAY?

    THE LORD JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF SAYS IN Matthew 18:21-22
    21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?

    22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.

    Like

  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @John, if u are going to speak of commonsense then please show that you are using it yourself!

    The Dems are the majority in the US Congress THEREFORE commonsense should dictate that Schiff is NOT a Ranking Member but a Chairman of committee. That’s straightforward too… Ranking does refer to the most senior member on a committtee…when you are in the MINORITY party!

    —–*A committee of congress is NOT akin to a police department…your el jefe de la policia is an absolutely FALSE, null and void comparison. He is one of 15 members…He alone cannot dictate the outcome despite being the chairman leader.

    This is POLITICS so definitely members are biased but they are OBLIGATED to rule on the evidence found. Wasnt Republican Chair (Oversight Com.) labelled as also prejudging during the Benghazi affair …didnt he still do his job effectively and also grilled Sec of State Clinton with a heavy bias but IN THE END produced a detailed report of merit!

    Is it thus not also COMMONSENSE that an investigating congressional committee cannot be properly equated to an investigating police department…who dont just produce reports!

    Why do YOU utter such misleading and downright FALSE data repeatedly on this site…

    Even if Joe Biden is ever indicted on corruption related to his son’s business dealings do you UNDERSTAND that does NOT absolve this POTUS of the impeachable offense he committed…

    Do you UNDERSTAND that whatever Barr or Durham finds that it cannot change the facts of the Russian interference in 2016 nor change the POTUS strange behaviour and comments to the Russians since then, nor those to Zelensky!

    Do you UNDERSTAND that proving one crime cannot by itself change or disprove the facts of a completely separate crime!

    Do you understand that to anyone with a modicum of awareness of these issues you appear clueless and lacking commonsense!

    Like

  • By now the brother and family must have gone into hiding
    That symbolic gesture of forgiveness will not sit well with the white Supremacist
    There is a killer on the loose and its number 1 target from the case has met their demise
    An innocent hug could as well become a symbol of death

    Like

  • I told them that you NEVER touch a filthy, dirty racist, it is a death sentence…….NEVER hug those CURSES..,,maybe one day they will learn AFTER more of them have been BRUTALLY MURDERED….racists are the stains on this earth, they all need to be SCRAPED OFF and ERADICATED.

    Like

  • You dreamt about getting? I really think someone should give you one.
    You don’t you wait until at least there is a suspect before you try pushing your agenda?
    Now I am not defending the KKK and agree that you should not underestimate them but what if the killing was black on black will you still blame the hug?

    Like

  • WHY DONALD TRUMP?

    FOR THE COMING DAYS AHEAD. Ask yourself an honest question, why would a billionaire who has it all, fame, fortune, a warm and loving family, friends, etc. want to endanger himself and his family by becoming POTUS?
    Why would he want to target himself and those he cares about?
    Does he need money?
    Does he need fame?
    What does he get out of this?
    Does he want to make the US/world a better place for his family and for those good and decent people who have long been taken advantage of?
    Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of mass murders occurring to satisfy Moloch?
    Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of children being kidnapped, drugged, and raped while leaders/law enforcement of the world turn a blind eye.
    Perhaps he was tired of seeing how certain races/countries were being constantly abused and kept in need/poor/and suffering all for a specific purpose.
    Perhaps he could not in good conscious see the world burn.
    Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?
    Why didn’t HRC give a concession speech?
    When was the last time a presidential candidate didn’t personally give a concession speech?
    What happens if the border remained open and the MSM continued to brainwash?
    At what point do Patriots, and hard working men and woman, become the minority?
    What about voting machines?
    Who owns the voting machines?
    What about voter ID laws?
    Photo ID? When is it necessary and must be presented? Make a list. Laugh.
    Reconcile.
    Would the chances of defeating evil grow less and less with each passing year?
    What does ‘red line’ mean?
    Why, again, were the arrests made in SA so very important?
    What strings were immediately cut?
    Follow the money.
    When does a bird sing?

    KEEP ON TRUMPING!

    Like

  • Seventy times seven is a finite number.

    Like

  • “@ GP October 6, 2019 9:55 AM
    I was forced to dust off a copy of the king James’ version to check out your comment. Very apt I found it.”

    Now you have dusted it off- keep it handy if you want to be able to apply practicality to your interpretation of the scriptures. the watered down new standard version, a plagiarism of the king james version misrepresents many a parable

    Liked by 1 person

  • So easy to pin the shooting of the defense killer on a black man
    John 2 what u need is a double dose of reality.

    Like

  • DPD,

    You and I have admitted to questionable behaviour by Democrats on several occasions. There is none who has completely clean hands. Damn, I don’t have completely clean hands!

    These Trumpians defend everything that this man does. That alone is telling.

    You are quite correct about Robert Lucas’ abuse of my words. He deliberately left out the main point of the statement which was that EVEN THOUGH I DESPISE TRUMP, I would not like MYSELF if I couldn’t be fair to him. And so I guard my integrity in arguments and would not let even Trump cause me to lose it. More important than who Trump is to me is WHO I AM!

    Imagine that he is prepared to argue that quid pro quo is normal behaviour, ignoring the fact that it is supposed to be in pursuit of the country’s interests and not Trump’s. SMH

    All your points above John is quite capable of understanding. He just doesn’t care.

    Kevin McCarthy on LIVE TV accused his interviewer of inserting the word “though” into the transcript. Maybe he didn’t read it before he jumped to Trump’s defence or maybe he didn’t want to see it. His surprise when told that it was in fact there was not feigned. The significance of the word “though” was yet again proven, this time by one of Trump’s greatest defenders.

    But the evidence mounts

    And we who have read the report know that Mueller actually said he was unable to prove a quid pro quo, a legal requirement in a conspiracy charge. He also said he was hindered in his investigation.

    Again, John simply parrots the lies from his idol.

    PS. The latest Trump card has been pulled out and played. This card is going to cost the loyal Kurds their lives. Distraction, distraction.

    And Lindsey Graham just called Trump a liar!

    Liked by 1 person

  • I pinned the murder on no one.
    I have not seen a description of the killer to be able to pine it on any race/ hug.

    Liked by 1 person

  • MariposaOctober 7, 2019 9:13 AM

    So easy to pin the shooting of the defense killer on a black man
    John 2 what u need is a double dose of reality.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Whenever has THAT been done?????

    PS. I am being sarcastic. That is what I meant when I said we needn’t worry because the Dallas Police Department is on the case. They can kill three blackbirds with one stone.

    Like

  • “Mueller said there was no collusion!!”

    John

    You’re repeating what Trump said.

    According to Robert Mueller, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities. They did not address “collusion,” which is not a legal term. Rather, they focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.

    That’s an important distinction, between a colloquial term, collusion, and what Mueller’s team sought to determine, which was whether there was enough evidence to prove criminal conspiracy. Mueller is pointed: There was no determination on “collusion” — and there may have been at least some evidence pointing to possible conspiracy.

    Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) asked Mueller re: “Director Mueller, “the president has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him, but that is not what your report said, is it?”

    “Correct,” Mueller replied. “That is NOT what the report said.”

    “So the report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction of justice, is that correct?” Nadler asked.

    “That is correct,” Mueller replied.

    “And what about total exoneration? Did you totally exonerate the president?” Nadler continued.

    “No,” Mueller said.

    “Does your report state there is sufficient factual and legal basis for FURTHER INVESTIGATION of potential obstruction of justice by the president?” Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) later asked.

    “Yes,” Mueller replied.

    Under questioning from Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Mueller contradicted Trump’s claims.

    “Did your investigation find that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from one of the candidates winning?” Lofgren asked.

    “It did,” Mueller replied. Lofgren followed up: “Which one?”

    “Well,” Mueller said, “it would be Trump.”

    It was a situation where Trump said the Mueller report totally exonerated him, while Mueller, in explaining his report, essentially implied Trump was lying.

    Despite this evidence, the Trump fanatics would obviously believe what he said.

    Like

  • “Don’t want to interrupt your rant but did you know that one of Cruz’s best friend is Jamaican?”

    Do not want to interrupt your rant either but do you know that the son-in-law of former republian house speaker John Boehner is a dreadlocked Jamaican Rastafarian construction worker

    Like

  • Dallas police officer Amber Guyger’s conviction for the murder of her neighbor Botham Jean was in part made possible by video provided by an eyewitness who filmed the shocking event on her cell phone. But the lone witness, known only as Bunny came under attack along with a great deal of scrutiny which resulted with her being fired from her job at a pharmaceutical company.
    The unjustified shooting death of Botham Jean by Dallas police officer Amber Guyger sent shockwaves through America. Guyger entered his apartment allegedly thinking it was her own and shot him dead. the lone witness to the Botham Jean shooting has stated her life is in turmoil and she is being labeled a Black radical.
    The witness has been identified only as Bunny and has stated that she recorded Guyger on her cellphone after hearing the fatal shots and Botham asking Guyger why did you shoot me. That video was seized by prosecutors and has not been seen by the public. In addition, she was placed under a gag order by the prosecution and cannot discuss the details of the video in public. Despite the fact she was only a witness to the shooting, she has received death threats and now she says she has been fired from her job.

    According to her, people began contacting the pharmaceutical company where she worked claiming that she was a radical, anti-police and a Black extremist. As a result, she claims the company did not want the publicity and fired her as well as revoking the credentials of her profession.(Quote)

    Like

  • SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @GPOctober 6, 2019 10:44 PM

    Hey! GP. You forgive me yet for pointing out truthfully that you were NOT the originator of our polyclinic system? that both the Enmore Health Center and the Speightstown Health Center were up and running while you were still in diapers, perhaps before you were even conceived, and that those clinics provided dental services, pre-natal and post natal services, well baby services and immunizations, contraceptive services, health care for elders with with chronic non-communicable diseases, the public health inspectorate, community nursing services I referenced particularly nurses Holita Horton, and nurse Mayers, subsequently Waldron at Speightstown, public health nurses who were hard at work before you entered Harrison College BEFORE you entered Harrison College.

    But then again I don’t need nor want your forgiveness because I have not sinned against you, because telling the truth is not a sin, nor is it a crime.

    The Gospel according to St. John, Chapter 8, verse 32 “You shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

    Amen.

    Liked by 1 person

  • “But it is too obvious he can’t be a realistic candidate.”

    and if he were so regarded by his party; rather than Mrs Clinton with so much soiled baggage to her name Mr Biden as a sitting vice president to a doolittle but popular administration for eight years he should have been the party’s unanimous choice to carry the party’s banner in the Presidential election when he would have been a much younger candidate with the ability to at least control his dentures

    Like

  • de pedantic Dribbler

    What in the world is going on here at this Dallas apt. complex?

    Why are Black folk being exorcised so aggressively!

    @Donna, I have no issue with the man John or Doc Lucas not wanting to understand but of course the pain point is them spreading their nonsense across the blog so regularly .

    Their posts should come with a warning like used in entertainment industry…BS: Blasted Folly.

    In this Upside Down world ‘S’ is the mirror of ‘F’… “6 at start “9 (8 actually) from end😂!

    Like

  • “As a president he has a leadership style the world can do without. We will see how it plays out.”

    So did Mr Stuart and the electorate was the final judge and jury; why cannot the electoral process be allowed to do the same in America with elections due in about 858 days

    Liked by 1 person

  • Donna my comment was meant for John2

    Hal the cop racist history speaks volumes
    One does not have to look too far to find kkk attachments to this case

    Like

  • Mari

    the kkk may be responsible for the killing of the witness as you said but what I cannot understand is why are you blaming it on the hug?

    if the kkk is responsible I would more think that the planning to kill the witness was done long before the hug and that it was don’t on condition if the female cop was found guilty. – not from an unexpected hug.

    ps I am neither for or against the hug/ I am neutral at this point.

    Like

  • Mariposa,

    I know. I was actually pointing out that your idea had also crossed my mind.

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s