Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The following was posted as a comment to the Fixing Motor Accidents post by #Artax – Blogmaster
mia mottley
Prime Minister Mia Mottley

There seems to be a misunderstanding among some Barbadians that police officers are no longer required to respond to traffic accidents.

We must first acknowledge the fact that, effective Sunday, September 15, 2024, BPS introduced a New Road Traffic Accident Investigation Policy to manage traffic accidents. Under this policy, police officers would no longer routinely respond to SIMPLE ‘fender benders,’ (i.e. minor, non-injury collisions)……

……but to accident scenes ONLY UNDER SPECIFIC, higher-risk circumstances, such as road fatalities, serious injury, hit and run incidents, pedestrian involvement, mass casualty events……
……OR potential breach of peace, suspected criminal activity, if the free flow of traffic has been severely interrupted or where there is a road safety issue.

It is important to note that responders from the insurance companies had UNDERGONE training by the police, which was structured to assist insurance investigators in gathering the required information to facilitate any future civil litigation.

I believe BPS should adopt a more AGGRESSIVE APPROACH to ENFORCING the road traffic regulations, completely eradicating the so-called “minibus culture,” as well as ‘crack down on’ the motorcycle nonsense, excessive speeding by Chefette, FedEx and KFC drivers, and persons operating vehicles without valid drivers’ licenses and insurance.

But then again, we’ve been STRUGGLING with IMPLEMENTING the tint laws and INTRODUCING breathalyser testing.

In 2017, former Minister of Transport and Works Michael Lashley announced testing would become a reality after the legislative framework was established under Section 14 of Road Traffic (Amendment) Act, 2017-26.
The then RBPF was supposed to commence implementation of the tests on January 1, 2020.

On Thursday, March 3, 2022, Police Public Relations Officer, (the late) Acting Inspector Rodney Inniss, subsequently informed the public that BPS would be utilising breathalyser testing effective April 1, 2022.
However, on March 31, 2022, the Cabinet decided to halt implementation. Then AG Dale Marshall explained that other supporting facets, such as the introduction and regulation of metered taxis, needed to be finalised first.

It’s now September 21, 2026, approximately FOUR (4) YEARS and FIVE (5) months after…… Barbadians ‘REMAIN in the dark’ about government’s position on this issue.

David, I agree with you that there are TOO MANY vehicles on our roads, and we have to cope with the fact that almost every month a new used car sales outlet opens in Barbados.

There are approximately nine (9) used car sales outlets located between Warrens and Barbarees Hill, for example.

I shudder to think of the chaos that would be created if ALL those vehicles are sold. 😱

We also have to take roads into consideration, many of which have fallen into a dire state of disrepair, mainly because of a lack of maintenance or neglect.

However, to this administration’s credit, Transport and Works Minister Kirk Humphrey, recently announced a major road repair and pothole patching programme for communities across Barbados, commencing with northern parishes.

Additionally, on November 3, 2025, Jason Bowen, MTW’s Deputy Chief Technical Officer, (Design Services) disclosed government’s “phased introduction of traffic management strategies designed to enhance road safety, reduce congestion, and improve the overall transportation experience for road users.”

It’s only a few weeks away from November 3, 2026. Perhaps the planning phase is still in progress.

This BLP administration seems not to experience any difficulties planning exorbitantly priced fetes, parades, consultations etc, at the expense of Barbadian taxpayers. The recent CARIFESTA debacle is a perfect example.

They bragged about hosting a successful, $35.7M CARIFESTA XV last August, but after three ‘3 loves,’ CANNOT boast about any successful housing programme, for example.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

31 responses to “Barbados traffic woes continue under a 3-time winning Barbados Labour Party government”


  1. ONE LINE VERDICT:

    No one has “ANSWERS” 2 the ills of any society on this “LIFE_SUPPORT” earth!!!


  2. @Artax, do you live in Barbados and is your car tinted dark.

    Do you have a car you drive in the daily hot sun.

    Are you using more gas as you have to turn you ac higher.

    Do you belong to the privileged class of politician, judiciary, dilplomat, police or army with dark tint feeling cool while driving in the extremely hot sun.

    When foolish people says dark tint causes crime and light tint makes it easier to detect criminals.


  3. @ Jerry

    RE: “@Artax, do you live in Barbados and is your car tinted dark.”

    Yes, I live in Barbados, and my car is NOT tinted dark.

    RE: “Do you have a car you drive in the daily hot sun.”

    Yes, but LIMITED to BUSINESS and NECESSARY purposes during the day ONLY, and mainly for pleasure at night. 😜😉

    RE: “Are you using more gas as you have to turn your ac higher.”

    No. I own a hybrid vehicle.

    RE: “Do you belong to the privileged class of politician, judiciary, dilplomat, police or army with dark tint feeling cool while driving in the extremely hot sun.”

    No, I do not.
    However, you should bear in mind that statutory exemptions in most vehicle codes legally and explicitly EXCLUDE emergency, law enforcement and other vehicles you mentioned, from civilian window tint regulations.

    RE: “When foolish people says dark tint causes crime and light tint makes it easier to detect criminals.”

    I haven’t read any contribution to BU in which its author mentioned anything about “dark tint causes crime.”
    The central point contributors have continually made is that government drafted and passed the tint laws, but has so far FAILED at each attempt to implement it.

    That, according to Bushie, “many hands that can’t make one shiite work.” 😀

    Interestingly, YOU’RE the PERSON who posted the above self-incriminating statement, NOT ME, thereby exposing yourself as being among those “foolish people.” 😱

    Perhaps HIMAR (حمار) is a more appropriate word to describe you. 🤣🤣


  4. Traffic – slang for being blocked and going nowhere fast x 3*

    (*) When people walking on foot or riding on bikes are passing cars on their journey from A to B and back again from B to A, it is time to ditch using cars**

    (**) except for when traffic is light between 3-6 AM


  5. Well according to the authorities approximately 30% of the vehicles on our roads are uninsured. Either get them insured or remove them from the road. That should help traffic flow.

    I have to ask a question here to any that know the factual answer. If there is an accident and my car that is insured is right, with my agent showing up confirming this, but the other vehicle is uninsured what is the process then? Does my insurance person make a note of the vehicle number and drivers name, both of which may be fake and forward this to the police? Must I then make a claim on my insurance company thereby losing no claim bonus, seeing that my repair cost is $10,000? IF the uninsured driver is found and the police take him to court, where from previous charges he pays $2500 in a fine how does that help me?

    I really don’t understand why this is so difficult to address. Years ago in the 70s they were checks done by police and a printed document placed on the inside of the checked vehicles if all was in order. You telling me in 2026 with computers and a wash of information at our finger tips we can’t deal with this issue? Or once the state collecting the fuel taxes all is well?


  6. @John A

    Didn’t the government construct the arches at strategic locations across Barbados to identify uninsured vehicles? Is it true that supporting legislation to prosecute offenders continue to be stalled?


  7. @ David

    I was in St Vincent 2 years ago and they had a simple solution. They have a bright coloured sticker about 4inches x 6 inches that must be displayed on the windshield. The sticker has on the year and vehicle number and its proof of license and insurance along with other info. Every year the sticker changes to another bright colour that is no way mistakable from the prior year.

    Simple, can be seen from far and does not require a wash of money or technology to work.


  8. That will not work in Barbados @JohnA, we are committed to going digital.


  9. “I was in St Vincent 2 years ago and they had a simple solution.”
    “That will not work in Barbados @JohnA”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    It worked in Brassbados for eons…

    Until a certain ‘jack of all mess-ups’ went up at BLA and spent a fortune on license plate stickers …that were OBVIOUSLY impractical…
    But it is an ill wind that blows nobody good….
    He was doing his usual shiite… until he was promoted to more complex areas to practice his excrement.

    What a place!
    Bushie is surprised that after the circus fiasco, minister MC has not made the ‘senior minister’ cut yet….
    Unless a ‘most honorable’ is in store…

    There appears to be no ‘mess-up’ that goes unrewarded…


  10. @ Bushie

    Lord you mean for us to look at It em got to be high tech and expensive? But we try the high tech road already, with expensive poles cross the road and thing, and them prove to be just pigeon perches. At least the Vincy way would be cheaper, not as fancy and don’t have no steal in them or nothing so as dem is only paper so nothing structural to worry bout.


  11. @ David

    What John A described is the norm in other Caribbean islands.

    Unfortunately, our government decided to make a SIMPLE task VERY difficult and expensive.

    Here’s an example from St. Lucia.

    https://www.tema.ru/travel/caribethnoexp-7/


  12. @ John A

    Seems as though EVERY policy initiative both BLP & DLP administrations implemented had an underlying association to a SCAM.

    Duguid introduced the tags, which lasted for approximately three years. He was also responsible for the steel houses debacle.

    It would be interesting to read an audit of taxpayers’ money WASTED under his watch. But, so what?
    Mottley rewarded him with the title of SENIOR minister.

    Rather than simplify a process, politicians look for the most expensive methods, to only discard them and move on to the next expensive choice, thereby giving the appearance that someone has gained financial benefits therefrom, and perhaps a ‘finder’s fee’ paid to the politician.

    But, then again, the money isn’t theirs.


  13. @Artax

    Vaguely recall when a former DLP minister Michael Lashley was responsible for the transportation ministry, he promised to implement a system modeled on Bermuda?


  14. @Artax

    As important to note here is that taxpayers in the current system seem incapable of holding them accountable.


  15. @ Artax

    I agree with all you have said. It appears in an attempt to be seen as “punching above our weight” we have created complex systems that do not work. I will not accept that in a small country like ours we can’t deal with this problem of uninsured vehicles, especially when they are simple answers like our neighbours have all shown us.


  16. “…taxpayers in the current system seem incapable of holding them accountable.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Get real Boss…
    How does a captive, miseddykated, mentally chained, brass-bowl hold his captors accountable?
    – especially when his main DREAM in life is to somehow become just like his captors?

    Don’t you see how the poorest of the poor idolize the politicians?
    …and how they mimic the wicked ways?

    …and in seems the more dishonest, lying and unreliable the captors are, the more they are adored.
    Birds of a feather…
    They will ALSO die together, cause Karma is almost out of time…

    What a place!


  17. Artax said…
    “It would be interesting to read an audit of taxpayers’ money WASTED under his watch. But, so what?”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Interesting?!?

    What is ‘interesting’ is that there has been NO audits shared… of ANY of the shiite…
    And furthermore, a certain ‘Trotman’ who had the audacity to raise such questions PUBLICLY, … is no more.

    OBVIOUSLY these audits MUST exists. People get PAID to do them. But unfortunately, if they are published then ‘charges’ would HAVE to be brought…
    Not that anyone would be jailed – or even tried in court (our courts only work with poor brass bowls as was the situation back in the old plantation days).
    It would just be ‘politically inexpedient’,
    …and THAT is our current MORAL compass.

    Wuh, when a man could rob THOUSANDS of CLICO depositors of MILLIONS of dollars, and walking bout as free as a bird – because he could probably ‘call a lotta political names’, there can be no fear of actual local convictions…

    What a place!
    Is there ANY lower that we can fall morally, ethically, and spiritually?


  18. There is another reason this government will not return to a simple sticker on windshield approach and it would be the embarrassment they would face. Having spent millions when a simple sticker on the windshield would have worked, would show a shameful example of wastage. I mean which party would want that?


  19. Getting uninsured vehicles off the road requires more than a simple administrative solution. For any adminstrative solution to work, it will require siginficant manpower to get the violators off the road. With a police force already understaffed and bigger priorities like crime, this would be a misuse of resources.
    What they could do after implementing the low cost sticker solution is set an amnesty period then carry out targeted interventions at big events like Reggae on the Hill. Deploy the police with wheel boots and any vehicle not displaying the sticker gets a boot. The driver then has to explain themselves,
    and the police can apply discretion. But impound yards, drivers and tow vehicles will be needed.
    The Math however is a challenge a number like 30k uninsured would require a tremendous amount of manpower to make a dent. And this does not account for the additional uninsured added each month. We let this problem go on for too long and it has become normalised and I am not sure there is the political will to do something about it.


  20. All that is required is for a law to be passed, quickly that any uninsured car caught will be confiscated and sold or dumped by the state. The driver’s license suspended for up to 5 years AND if the uninsured car injures or takes a life, a period of imprisonment. Surely we have to get serious with crime.

    Can’t we look over the pond to see how Trinidad government and opposition are politicizing the issue with the current crime bill debate?


  21. 1. Bring more and more laws but the police force still too small and busy to enforce the existing laws how will they be able to enforce new laws?

    2. What/where are the figures to show that the paper decals are solving similar problems in the neighboring islands?


  22. Donald Drumpf did not even stop traffic in Bridgetown or Trenchtown yesterday when at the world’s highest law body, the UNGA, Drumpf threatened the entire world with nuclear annihilation. At the United Nations.

    Some here have stupidly concluded that Drumpf is an idiot. Well, they said so about Hitler too. The only difference is that Drumpf has what Adolf Hitler never had, the means to do just that, the use his 6,000 thermal nuclear weapons to go for glory. But it only takes 400 to destroy every living organism on earth.

    But even this is a dynamic. For no other nuclear powered nation will countenance the use of nuclear weapons anywhere without such a doctrine which demands that the totally of their arsenal be immediately deployed. A doctrine of “use them or lose them”.

    Iran, a country without nuclear weapons, but which defeated the Americans, Israel and NATO several times, directly and indirectly, in conventional or kinetic warfare, over more than 30 years, represents an outcome not to be swallowed by a dying hegemon.

    We had long foecasted this schema. Circumstances where White people are determined to destroy the entire planet before one sintilla of global power is surrendered, especially to non-Whites. Bringing us to this juncture.

    And not for the first time. In 1949 it was another president of empire, a racist Harry S. Truman, who dropped nuclear weapons on Nagasaki and Hirmoshimo at a time when Japan was about to surrender and was clearly defeated in the Eastern Theatre.

    Historians contend that the atomic bombs were dropped on Japan but landed on the USSR. It was the crazy American way of telling the Soviet Unión what would happen to it if it interfered with America’s post-war designs. Of course the USSR, subsequently, also discovered the atom bomb, thus equalizing the nature of great powers rivalries up until now. The future was thereby different.

    We are again at a similar inflection point with the wars of WW3 in which the entire world is now inescapably again locked.


  23. @John 2

    Any paper system will have loopholes. The debate is whether our heavily invested system has improved about the older system we had.


  24. @ Redguard

    What you say is true but an impound facility and tow to impound are all self financing to the operator, whether it is the state or private sector that runs it.

    Every vehicle impounded pays a daily fee that is dependant on its size. Hence a motorcycle would pay a fraction of what a ZR would pay. Along with the daily storage fee there is the tow fee, which again can be privatised under the control of the police. The police will be present for the impound and its delivery to the yard. The yards are usually fenced with serious security and no vehicle can leave the yard unless the impound fee is paid and proof of insurance presented.

    This is done all over the world either in partnership with the private sector or in some other arrangement that literally cost the state nothing. Once this is in place then ALL traffic offenses that do not include bodily harm can be dealt with this way, when uninsured vehicles or unlicensed drivers are involved. One could even extend this facility by introducing a ticketing system and take much of the load off the traffic court for speeding etc.

    No need to try to reinvent the wheel here.


  25. “Donald Drumpf did not even stop traffic in Bridgetown or Trenchtown yesterday when at the world’s highest law body, the UNGA, Drumpf threatened the entire world with nuclear annihilation. At the United Nations.”

    Thank you for this.. I was looking for an angle to weave my thought on this matter

    Septic Tanks Yanks Wanks always go for War! to get votes in elections
    It’s the oldest trick in the book for the bloody minded patriotic nutjobs
    Trump is F’kin arrogant scum but so are 99.99% of all yanks arrogant scum too


  26. On the world stage.


  27. People should be careful for what they wish for as Government solutions to problems are not always desirable outcomes as they want to generate income with more tax, fines and charges.

    If you look at Barbados’ other motherland (not Africa) UK, the solutions for traffic congestion, pollution and crime is implementation of technology to have the most cameras in the world for speeding tickets and linking up insurance policies on central databases which are policed in real time so police wait for offenders at the end of the road on their journey, taxing cars with prohibitive congestion charges in urban centres so people stop using cars, using cameras with facial recognition and suspect criminal databases for monitoring citizens, protests, carnivals and crime fighting.

    As Barbados has less than 300,000 people technology may be too expensive, but a collective Caricom solution could be implemented.

    People objected to flyovers, but trams, trains and improved bus services could be more conducive to tourism and locals in urban centres and remote regions.


  28. Operators denied fair hearing

    by MARIA BRADSHAW mariabradshaw@nationnews.com

    VETERAN TRADE UNIONIST Caswell Franklyn and president of the Public Service Vehicle Workers Association, David Douglin, have slammed the disciplinary system at the Transport Authority, branding it a “kangaroo court” that denies public service vehicle (PSV) operators basic due process.

    The condemnation came during an emergency Zoom meeting last Sunday, hosted by the new association, where operators and owners aired grievances about how they were being monitored and regulated.

    Operators complained they were being summoned via telephone to the Transport Authority’s Roebuck Street offices, and suddenly shown videos or photographs of alleged infractions and immediately informed of their suspension, without the opportunity to secure representation.

    “This is like Z a kangaroo court,” Douglin charged.

    “Obviously, that is not fair, because you did not give that man a chance to seek counsel or a representative. You did not give him time. As a matter of fact, you did not even give him the right to a fair hearing. When he gets to that meeting, and you spring all these things on him and ask, ‘Was this you? Okay, I suspend you’, that is not following due process at all,” he said.

    Douglin highlighted a case where a driver was shown a video of an infraction and suspended on the spot. The driver, knowing it was not him in the footage, appealed the decision. However, Douglin noted that the driver only received his registered mail regarding the appeal after the meeting had already taken place.

    “In some cases, they are sending unregistered mail, so by the time the post office gets the mail to you, the appeal case is already in session and you were missing. You cannot give a very short date for the appeal when you know you are sending it via mail,” he reasoned.

    Franklyn interjected that summoning a man to a hearing by telephone was improper and seemingly sets up operators to fail.

    “You can’t get the opportunity to put a case when somebody just presents the evidence to you when you get there. If that was a disciplinary hearing in my area, it would have been a case of unfair dismissal, because you must give the person the evidence against them before they get to the meeting,” Franklyn contended.

    Illegal suspensions

    He also accused the Transport Authority of “boasting” about suspending 82 people

    without revealing that those individuals were denied a fair hearing.

    Franklyn advised operators to refuse to participate in hearings without a union representative.

    “Do not go back to those hearings without a representative. If they ask who your representative is, tell them me, if you are one of my people.”

    Douglin agreed with Franklyn’s assessment, stating: “In my opinion, the 82 suspensions would have been 82 illegal suspensions, because according to natural justice and due process, it wasn’t followed.”

    The trade unionist also questioned whether the authority had the legal jurisdiction to suspend drivers’ licences, stating that he needed to verify the legal precedent but criminal offences must be adjudicated by a magistrate.

    He warned that operators could potentially sue the authority for lost wages if their licences were suspended wrongfully.

    Franklyn stressed that even in cases where operators were in the wrong, they were still entitled to a proper hearing.

    While he acknowledged that some PSV operators engaged in poor behaviour on the roads, Franklyn maintained that the law must still be followed.

    “Some of you do foolishness, but everybody gets painted with the same brush. If a fella shoots somebody in the middle of the road and everybody sees it, you still got to carry him to court and try him. So, if you stop other than at a bus stop, yes, it’s an offence, but a murderer gets his day in court. You should get your day in court too.”

    Douglin concluded the meeting by stressing the urgent need for unionisation.

    “This is one of the reasons why we decided to take charge of the PSV Workers Association, to bring these guys into the know. We are moving to unionise these operators so they can have the adequate representation they need going forward.”

    When contacted for a response to the claims, Director of the Transport Authority, Ruth Holder, stated: “They need to refer to the Transport Authority regulations.”

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending