Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Dr. De Lisle Worrell continues to be a controversial figure in Barbados. He suffered the embarrassment of being sacked by former Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler. The blogmaster will remember him for the fact he presided as Governor of the Central Bank during a period popularly labelled the Lost Decade. He continues to be controversial in his current role sitting on the other side of the negotiating table by epresenting some of the external creditors.

The following text is posted to caribbeansignal.com  and makes for interesting reading given his  (Worrell) role as lead negotiator for external creditors and the current state of the Barbados economy.

Discuss for 10 marks.

-David, Blogmaster


Reproduced with permission, the full text of Dr. Delisle Worrell – former Governor of the Central Bank of Barbados – June 2019 newsletter:

The Time Has Come to Permanently Retire All Our Caribbean Currencies Caribbean currencies served a crucial purpose when they were first introduced, but they have now become a nuisance in today’s digitised world.

The world of commerce and finance today bears no resemblance to the world for which Caribbean currencies were devised. Up until the 1960s in most Caribbean countries, all retail transactions and many wholesale transactions were settled with notes and coins. The means of payment were always scarce in those days, because our countries are so distant from the European capitals that issued the world’s major currencies.

In the first half of the 20th century it became commonplace in countries of the British Empire to issue local currency notes and coins, with values fixed to Sterling (for the most part; the Bahamas and Bermuda were exceptions). These currencies were issued by special Government departments, termed Currency Boards. The Currency Board held an amount of Sterling with the Bank of England or with the British Crown Agents, and issued an equivalent amount of local currency. In this way the amount of the local currency issue could be more easily tailored to local needs.

This system worked well, so long as currencies were anchored on a single universally used reference, the US dollar price of an ounce of gold. However, the whole system of currency values fell apart when the US effectively moved off the Gold Standard at the time of the Smithsonian Agreement in December 1971.

Nowadays, currency notes and coin, mostly of uncertain value in terms of purchasing power of the everyday goods and services we need to source abroad, are little used domestically. Mostly we use electronic transfers, cheques and credit cards. Since these are all computer records, it is immaterial how they are denominated, so long as both ends of every transaction match. There is no reason to link the denomination of the electronic transactions to the value of notes and coins.

Replacing the Barbados dollar with the US dollar for all transactions, domestic and foreign, enhances the range of choice open to the country and its residents, in all international commerce. International transactions are conducted in US dollars or in currencies that are convertible to US dollars. In contrast, with Barbados dollars you cannot buy or sell anything outside of Barbados, not even in nearby St Lucia, much less in the rest of the world. The GDP of Barbados in 2018 was about US$5 billion, but the country had access to less than US$3 billion of international goods and services, because that was the total availability of US dollars and other foreign exchange from exports, tourism and other services, and foreign financial inflows. Once the economy is fully converted to US dollars and the local currency fully retired, the entire US$5 billion may be used to obtain the best value for money, in transactions anywhere in the world.

This is an executive summary of my Working Paper of the same title, issued at DeLisleWorrell.com.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

271 responses to “Dr. DeLisle Worrell Says Time to Jettison Caribbean Currencies”


  1. @William

    I don’t see anything wrong with the EC dollar. Lets be honest our dollar now in realty probably ain’t worth much more than the EC dollar anyhow. Thing is we would still have Jamaica, Trinidad and Guyana out there with 3 other fluctuating currencies in the region.

    Ideally if we could all go to one currency in the region that would be great, but I can’t see the big 3 going to the EC$ ,the USD maybe though.

    Just think of how easy it would be to get on a plane with one currency and travel through the region and pay our bills. The problem is unless we can get past the issue of
    a potential cari-brexit we doomed to confusion.


  2. William I wouldn’t go as far as saying the system is broken, I would say the system of controls is a dismal failure and it is too suseptable to interference from government. Ring fencing by new laws is one option, but laws can be changed. I feel we need to move the control to a regional authority like the ECCB and use their currency, or adopt a tamper free international currency.

    After what I have seen happen under the last MOF I don’t want to ever see that power in the hands of another local government again!

  3. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ John A
    Time for a single Caribbean dollar? June 25th 2007

        Sir Ronald Sanders
    

    The writer is a business consultant and former Caribbean diplomat

    Serious attention has to be given to the creation of a single currency by the countries of the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) that last year signed an agreement to establish a Single Market.
    If they don’t, the single market will begin to unravel as free movement of goods and services fails to bring significant benefits because transaction costs remain high and exchange rates continue to foster uncertainties.

    A monetary union and a single currency in the countries of the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) would be a boon to commercial operations in the region from the smallest trader to the largest corporation.

    Multi-destination tourists

    It would also be a delight to multi-destination tourists and to the ordinary CARICOM citizen travelling from one country to another.

    CARICOM countries need look no further than within their seven smaller member states, the countries that comprise the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), to witness some of the benefits of a currency union and single currency.

    In the OECS countries, cross border investment has increased, the currency is the strongest in the region, transaction costs for business is less than they are with other CARICOM countries, and the people of the area are able to travel without the burden of having to change their money.

    Economic Space

    During the recently concluded Cricket World Cup tournament in the Caribbean, the absence of a single currency in the much vaunted “single economic space” was a glaring weakness.

    Persons travelling from one country to another, except within the OECS, found that they had to endure the inconvenience of changing money at every destination, often losing heavily on exchange rates.

    In a recent paper to CARICOM Heads of Government, noted Economist, Norman Girvan, observed: “Among the advantages of monetary union are reduction of transaction costs of intra-regional trade, investment and remittances; increased price transparency, reduced exchange rate uncertainty, enhanced efficiency of financial markets, and a deepened sense of regional identity”.

    Dollar default

    And, Barbados Central Bank governor, Dr Marion Williams, has warned that the United States dollar might emerge as a default common currency if CARICOM countries do not move toward a single currency.

    In 1992, another Barbados Central Bank official, Dr Delisle Worrell, had cautioned against adopting the US dollar as legal tender, saying that the lack of credible, convertible Caribbean currency “may give the US an enormous political lever over countries which are so dependent that they should maximise whatever opportunity avails to increase their room for manoeuvre”.

    To be fair to the US, no person in authority in the US has suggested that CARICOM countries should opt for the US dollar as their currencies.

    Cross-border transactions

    But, the reality is that cross-border transactions among CARICOM countries are conducted in US dollars, and in the absence of a single monetary authority and a single currency, the US dollar is the measure of exchange.

    On all counts it is highly desirable for CARICOM countries to establish a single currency.

    The West Indian Commission in its 1992 report, “Time for Action”, had suggested to CARICOM governments that “immediate steps should be taken towards the goal of a common currency”.

    Phased Basis

    And the Commissioners went on to propose that it should “be attained on a phased basis and under arrangements which take account of existing exchange rate differentials”.

    In reality, the seven OECS countries, Barbados and Belize could probably establish a single monetary authority and single currency within a short space of time.

    Euro
    Common currencies, such as the Euro, have proved to have strength when implimented.

    Their exchange rate and other economic factors are close enough to merge with little disruption.
    Criteria to join

    Other countries – Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, Guyana and Surinam – could operate on a parallel track with the single currency area until they satisfy criteria to join.

    A reference of how this could be done exists now in the European Union (EU).

    Fourteen EU member countries are not part of the European single currency, the euro, or the common central bank.

    They are required to achieve “sustainable economic convergence with the euro area”.

    Public Debt and exchange rates

    This includes price stability, a low level of public debt, and a stable exchange rate.

    In the meantime, agreements have been worked out to facilitate their trade, investment and currency conversion with the other thirteen EU members, but their costs are higher.

    A single monetary authority and a single currency for CARICOM countries could bring enormous benefits for more investment, greater trade, better prices for goods and services and easier movement of people for tourism and commerce.

    Single space

    The CARICOM single market, and the single economic space would then assume far greater relevance to the lives of Caribbean people.

    It is time for serious consideration to be given to a single Caribbean dollar.

    Please note this is just an article on the subject. Obviously there are now other factors at play. Note what Worrell said in 1992 and what he is saying now. I prefer what he said then than what he’s saying now. Also note what the former governor Marion Williams views were back then.


  4. @ William

    Sad thing is 30 years later and we are still no further on than then.


  5. As I said either the USD or the EC dollar would work for us, but it would be nice if for once we could agree to do something in the region that we could all benefit from, while at the same time strengthening the region on the whole.


  6. @ William

    I think why Worrell’ s view has changed from the EC TO USD is that since 1992 the currency of the big 3 has weakened drastically against the EC $, so to peg it regionally now through the ECCB would be a challenge. Where as if the region went for the USD, the big 3 would have to make their own adjustments within their central banks and thus ease the burden on the ECCB to have to try and accommodate them.


  7. “Time for a single Caribbean dollar? June 25th 2007.”

    Mr. Skinner

    A very interesting article.

    Can you remember an attempt was made to replace the commonly used American Express travellers’ cheques with CARICOM travellers’ cheques (CTC)?

    These CARICOM cheques were issued by the National Commercial Bank of Trinidad & Tobago Limited.

    Let me take you back to an article published by the Nation on November 9, 1981, entitled: “Use Those CARICOM Cheques.”

    The Central Bank has launched a campaign to encourage the use of Caricom Travellers Cheques.

    Central Bank Governor, Dr. Courtney Blackman, told THE NATION that the cheques had not gained acceptance.

    He said that some persons were reluctant to take the cheques and that there were reports that stores in Bridgetown were discounting them by about 10 cents.

    He said this was not in the interest of tourism and was not helping to encourage Trinidadians to Barbados.

    He added that the cheques were perfectly safe and acceptable, and no one should have trouble when they tendered the cheques.

    The Governor said that Banks were not allowed to issue American Express or other travellers cheques and the amount of American currency given to persons travelling was small, therefore the Caricom travellers cheque was an important medium of exchange for them.

    Dr. Blackman said that he had heard unofficially, that some Barbadians were having problems on tendering the cheques in other countries.

    “But, I cannot act on rumour,” he said.

    He added that Barbadians who experienced this problem, should write to the Central Bank about it on returning home and the bank would follow through.

    A number of finance officials from throughout the Caricom region held on of their bi-annual meetings at the Barbados Central Bank, last week.

    The group included governors from the central banks of Guyana, Barbados, Trinidad and Jamaica and an official from the Belize Monetary Authority.

    Deputy chairman of the group, Dr. Courtney Blackman of Barbados said that the matters discussed related to Caricom multilateral clearing facility and were quite technical.

    The chairman of the group is Victor Bruce of Trinidad.

    Mr. Skinner do you know what became of the CTC? I’m not seeing any information relative to the cheques on CARICOM’s website.


  8. If the region experienced problems maintaining CARICOM travellers’ cheques, what difficulties would you expect to be presented by a regional currency?

    I also invite you to read the following article:

    jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120626/business/business3.html


  9. @Artax

    The issue of the demise of the CTC was exhaustively discussed a couple weeks ago under the Land Tax blog.


  10. @TLSN and Hal

    Barbados is not a country that is welcoming to blacks especially with those who are prepared to speak out.*

    So the question is: what are we really doing in Barbados? What is the point of all the charades, the DLPBLP shenanigans ?
    At the end of the day the majority population is still largely disenfranchised. The brightest still have to leave the island to seek opportunities. The neo-plantocrats still control the economy.

    Maybe John, Moneybrain and Lawson are right and Bajans are better off under slavery.


  11. Are you kidding me???????


  12. One John Beale in his column is asserting that Barbados debt can be restructured with in a principal that the foreign creditors get the biggest haircut towards resolution and barbados should stand firm in negotiations
    He also asserts that Greece financial problems did not stop them from re-entering the bond market giving them a chance of acessing more credit
    What he does not mention is that unlike barbados Greece has more resources to foward as equty in acessing loans

    Greece’s main industries are tourism, shipping, industrial products, food and tobacco processing, textiles, chemicals, metal products, mining and petroleum.


  13. “The issue of the demise of the CTC was exhaustively discussed a couple weeks ago under the Land Tax blog.”

    David BU

    I did not read the “land tax blog” and the associated comments in its entirety………. therefore, I was not aware the issue was “exhaustively discussed.”

    Thanks for the information.


  14. unlike barbados Greece has more resources to foward as equty in acessing loans

    Greece’s main industries are tourism, shipping, industrial products, food and tobacco processing, textiles, chemicals, metal products, mining and petroleum. (Quote)

    It’s amazing. If the “chairman” had posted the above comments, by now Greene, Codrington and Austin would be telling us how appallingly ignorant he is and they don’t have time to discuss basic economics with a buffoon.

    Or he would be asked to explain the comments in plain English.

    Or is it that criticism is reserved for certain people?


  15. Maybe u Robert Goren can explain the ignorance of what is stated as Greece resources


  16. unlike barbados Greece has more resources to foward as equty in acessing loans (QUOTE)

    Maybe you Mariposa should explain the above ignorance in plain English.


  17. @ Artax

    You have clearly given thought to the issue so let me get your view on what’s at the core of this issue.

    What do you think based on all the printed paper we now have compliments of sinkler, is the BDS $ really worth to the USD?

    I believe that prior to his reign we may of been able to defend its value, but today based on the amount of useless paper we have chasing the USD supply I believe it is in real terms probably not even worth 1 ECD.


  18. @ William,

    Ignoring for the time being the wider implications of Dr Worrell’s suggestion of using the Greenback as legal tender (ie similar to Ecuador, and unofficially as most Caribbean nations already do), doing so will remove control of monetary policy from our central bank and minister of finance. Is that what we want?
    One obvious saving will be that of the cost of printing Barbados notes and forging coins. The economics of monetary policy I will ignore as I have said. Some one mentioned Greece, Greece is a member of the European Central Bank. How about a CARICOM central bank?


  19. Robert Goern maybe u should goggle the meaning of the word equity to get an explanation


  20. @ Hal

    What concerns me most is that if removing the control from the local MOF means that he or she going forward can no longer tamper with money supply, then I say yes take that option away from them sooner rather than later.

    The damage sinkler did will take years to correct not only in our economy, but also with the NIS. Anyone that thinks addressing the NIS rebuilding isn’t going to be another major burden for us the taxpayers, fooling themselves big time.


  21. Also switching to the USD means we as a people will only be able to spend what we can generate. There will be no more printing of money to keep a bloated civil service in place, nor will we be able to pump millions into an inefficient transport board.

    Basically going Green will force us to deal with issues whether they are politically favourable or not.

    It will therefore protect us from ourselves which the past has shown clearly needs to be done!


  22. Okay.

    Equity

    The quality of being fair and impartial.

    A branch of law that is developed alongside common law and is concerned with fairness and justice, formerly administered in special courts.

    The value of shares issued by a company.

    Stocks and shares that carry no fixed interest.

    The value of a mortgage property after deduction of charges against it.

    In the US, UK and several other countries…… a trade union to which all professional actors must belong.

    Equity represents the value of an investor’s stake in securities or a company.

    I googled equity. Can you please explain your comments in plain English?

  23. William Skinnet Avatar
    William Skinnet

    @ Artax

    The major problem was the inability to have stable regional currencies. We had currencies being floated etc. The administration of the facility was also thought to be very cumbersome. The facility was therefore closed. I think around 92/93


  24. Sir William Skinner

    It matters not how much we try, you still seem intent on searching the web to find ideas which support your own. Ideas properly located within a bygone era.

    More so, we will find several here giving credence to your quest for ideas whose time have passed.

    It seems not to bother you that your man Worrell was contradicting himself in the very articles you now cite as compared with what he’s saying currently about the efficacy of dollarization for the Caribbean.

    What is so amazing is that when the outlook for the American economy was much better Worrell was advising against the US dollarization. Now that the US economy has a far ‘darker’ outlook he’s saying exactly the opposite.

    Sir William, you, Worrell and your ‘motley’ gang of admirers are so recklessly committed to either a fiat currency or a failed regional project that it is impossible for any of you to see that the days for all fiat currencies are at an end.

    And it matters not whether that fiat currency is a single Caribbean dollar, the US dollar or the Euro. The only answer has to be real money. Money backed by real value – gold, silver, certain food items etc.

    You may have the last word.

  25. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    II have never questioned your sources or methods of research. I notice in recent times you exploit YouTube!
    I disagree with Worrell’s current position on both philosophical and ideological grounds. I seldom base my positions on anything else.
    It’s obvious that some of us have so dismissed and ridiculed the regional project, that we concentrate more on whether Mueller lock up Trump or predicting if May will resign. I have none or very brief space in my time for such.
    Most of the articles I read here I enjoy because it’s in my interest to keep an interests in all world affairs. However my main interest is to push a regional perspective. You should realize by now that the great minds I was exposed to were involved in liberating the Caribbean and not pontificating on other matters.
    Right under our noses a new Caribbean is emerging unfortunately many of us have condemned the Caribbean to a back water region while elevating their vast intellects on Trump Mueller and May.
    The reason I will continue to focus on the regional project is the fact that the current system we inherited, as you correctly state is collapsing.
    The reason the regional project has to be pushed is to avoid being further buried in the rabble of a collapsing system.
    Our world perspective is useless unless we identify our role in it. The only way forward is a unified Caribbean state. One common Caribbean currency fits into my perspective.
    On these philosophical and ideological grounds I cannot agree with Worrell and that’s why I could not agree with his advice to send home 5000 civil servants and the same reason I will not embrace any IMF agreement.


  26. @William

    The biggest problem as we discussed had to do with redemption, this is countries with net holdings of CTC unable to get reimbursement from the issuing country.


  27. @ John A

    Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Always think of the unintended consequences. The economics of monetary policy aside, does this abdication mean the end of Barbados as a nation-state after over 50 years of trying? Some people are calling for the return of colonialism; about 14 African countries eg against the euro; is this good?


  28. @ Hal

    I agree we don’t want to as you say throw out the baby with the bath water, but the system we have has failed us miserably. The thing is I am not comfortable going forward with any system that any MOF Can tamper with for political reasons. To say they are laws in place he also ignored all of them, from the government over draft limit to forcing banks to buy his worthless paper.

    I wouldn’t want to see us give up our sovereignty, but at the same time we can’t use this system going forward.

    Would you be comfortable going forward with the same protections in place for money supply that sinkler had?

    Would you also agree that any new laws they put in place with a majority of 30 to 0 they could also change of need be?


  29. @ Hal

    I noticed one of the reasons the African States listed for wanting to return was that they were overwhelmed by internal corruption regardless of who was in power.

    Sad statement for any country to have to make.


  30. Robert Goern

    equity can indicate an ownership interest in a business, such as stockholders’ equity or owner’s equity. Equity can mean the combination of liabilities and owner’s equity. For example, the basic accounting equation Assets = Liabilities + Owner’s Equity can be restated to be Assets = Equities.

  31. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ David
    You are correct.
    @ John A
    @ Hal

    About eight or so years ago , in a survey in Jamaica almost 60% of those responded that the country would have been better off under colonial rule. Frightening !
    Our economic failures are the result of very poor regional leadership.
    When we add the academic class selling out themselves to the political and corporate classes the situation becomes even more vexing.
    Future leaders will have a lot to correct but we must press on with a unified Caribbean state.


  32. @ John A

    How about an independent central bank? There s nothing wrong with a 3d0/nil drubbing in a democracy. What is wrong with our democracy is the appointment to the senate. Government should not be in a position to appoint the majority of senators effectively. The senate s a reviewing chamber.
    As to Sinckler, let us all agree that was a dark moment in our history. Stuart inherited Sinckler, but once he had won a general election and got his own mandate he should have sacked him. Stuart was too weak. He paid the price..


  33. Didn’t Bermuda turned down an opportunity to go independent? Didn’t Mozambique ask to join the Commonwealth? What for? There is a very strong movement in the UK calling for the return of colonialism.


  34. @ Hal

    Yes I regional central bank would be a safe move made up of a board where no island member could hold more than 1 seat and where the chairman of the board was elected only by the said independent board.


  35. A good day for Barbados. The red bishop founds his own party, the People’s Party for Democracy and Development. A clever move. Thus the bishop divides the forces of the opposition. Before the next elections, we must financially support the new party to steal the decisive votes from the DLP.

    For this we still need some willing and honourable candidates who aim exactly at the previous voters of the DLP: This means locals who don’t want to think for themselves and like to live from the welfare state at the taxpayer’s expense. The bishop’s election campaign must be aimed at these people.

    If the DLP screws up the elections again, the party is a case for the garbage bin. Let’s wait for the trial in New York. It could greatly accelerate the process of disintegration. If Donny is convicted, the DLP will first need a new chairman. I have some good suggestions here. The best thing to do is to install a mole like the red bishop, who breaks down the DLP from the inside.


  36. Hal let me tell you not only the English territories.

    I was working in Curacao when Aruba went for ” separate status” and told Curacao come with us. Curacao’s response was you all go ahead we good under Holland. That was back in the late 80’s or early 90s from memory.


  37. @ Hal

    Getting back to your regional central bank idea, what currency would you propose they use? If a new one how would you propose we fix a value on it all members could support?


  38. @ John A

    It would no mater what you call the currency – dollars, Caribes, whatever. I would fix against a basket of currencies and goods (our main trading partners) and float against the rest.
    A united and properly managed CARICOM would be wealthier than Norway and challenge Singapore.
    By eth way, Prime minister Motley told a London audience last night that the population of Barbados is too small. She came up with bogus numbers about Surinam, Guyana and Singapore. She also talked a lot about more hotels. We will be the hotel capital of the Caribbean.
    Look out for a changing demographic. African Bajans are on the way out. This will be President Mottley’s legacy.


  39. Remember if we use the ECD it would mean in real terms a devaluation of the Barbados dollar of roughly 30% in real terms.

    Not saying it can’t work just exploring the outcome.


  40. @ Hal

    You know where the stumbling block will come from. The same big 3. Jamaica, Trinidad and Guyana will all say we good on our own. To peg a currency in the region including those 3 with where their currency now stands would be a challenge.

    Plus we got Guyana now on the verge of becoming one of the wealthiest countries in the world based on their new found oil wealth.

    I agree with you though, if it could be done it would mean for the first time we would be seen as having true financial strength as a region. Plus the dream of free movement and one economy starts with 1 currency.


  41. I got to ask though how can a country with the new found wealth of Guyana have a currency that’s still worth so little? Something got to be wrong with the formulas used for measuring currency worth in real terms.


  42. @ Mariposa

    Equity is simply what remains after deducting liabilities from assets. Or what you have left after deducting what you owe from what you own.

    You need to accept that you saying a country has equity to access loans is what your fan base would call appalling ignorance.


  43. @ John A June 9, 2019 12:05 PM

    Oil is a promise of the future. Production is only just beginning. Moreover, Guyana must first repair the damage of 20 years of socialism under Burnham the Butcher.

    Wait, weren’t Burnham’s ancestors from Barbados? Maybe he is related to Chris Sinckler. He has no economic expertise either.


  44. (Quote);
    By eth way, Prime minister Motley told a London audience last night that the population of Barbados is too small. She came up with bogus numbers about Surinam, Guyana and Singapore. She also talked a lot about more hotels. We will be the hotel capital of the Caribbean. (Unquote)
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    How can the population of Barbados be “too small” given the continuing low level of economic activity and development?

    How can such an argument make sense when over 75,000 people of working age are deemed ‘Voluntary Idle’ out of a total population of approx 285,000?

    Shouldn’t she be looking for opportunities in a post-Brexit UK for some of those idle hands recently laid off in Barbados?

    Barbados needs to ‘export’ some of its excess to requirements ‘white-and blue collar’ jobseekers -as it did in the 50’s and 60’s- in order earn foreign exchange to keep the importation genie inside the conspicuous consumption bottle to keep away the Devaluation bogeyman.

    Who would want to come and work in Barbados (as a low skilled immigrant) today given the quality of low-income housing stock and its astronomical cost of living?

    What about finding investors for the Four Seasons foul-up or financiers for the Hyatt hotel in order to turn Maloney’s wet dream into a ‘real’ erection?


  45. @ Tron

    You say that oil is only a ” promise” of wealth for Guyana. Let them decide tomorrow to put that promise up for sale and you would jump when you see the billions international oil companies would pay in USD for the exclusive drilling rights.

    Every day an entire industry trades in promises in the world under the term ” future traders”. Look at the volume done on the NYSE alone for this segment and it would surprise you.

  46. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ John A

    We will trade hotels and the IMF agreement. LOL


  47. @John A
    Plus we got Guyana now on the verge of becoming one of the wealthiest countries in the world based on their new found oil wealth.

    ++++++++++++++++
    What is it about these optimistic projections, or to quote Greenspan “irrational exuberance”? Counter point, Venezuela has massive oil reserves where is it in term of wealth?


  48. @John A: You’re right that Guyana may soon be the richest country in the Caribbean. I don’t want to water down your testimony at all.

    @Miller June 9, 2019 12:29 PM
    “Some people are so undiscriminating that they say a Russian fart is fragrant. That too is subjectivism. The Russians themselves say it stinks. Therefore, we should be analytical.” (Chairman Mao)

    A comparison with Guyana is not possible because there are far fewer people living in this country than the official statistics would have us believe. To my knowledge, it is only about half a million.

    We must not take seriously everything that our Prime Minister says in front of an audience of clueless emigrants or foreign investors who live in their comfort zone. It is true that Barbados is absolutely overpopulated. If it were otherwise, the government would not have to feed so many superfluous and idle civil servants.

    According to my calculations, we need at least 10 percent of the population to emigrate so that the country can stabilise. We have too many bosses, academics, civil servants and other figures living at the expense of the state.

    I am also very sceptical about the number of hotels. Our beaches are already used up. Where will all the new hotels be built?

    Anyone who says I’m wearing red underpants is lying.

    Tron
    – fair and balanced –


  49. “The major problem was the inability to have stable regional currencies. We had currencies being floated etc.”

    Mr. Skinner

    Thank you.

    The common regional currency makes a good topic for discussion, especially when one considers the excellent contributions to BU on the issue so far.

    Based on the demise of the CARICOM travellers’ cheques……….and how the heads of governments of certain CARICOM member states behave, I’m not optimistic that regional integration will become a reality any time soon………. and so too a common regional currency.

    And under these circumstances you may want to ask if member states such as Bahamas….. and associate members such as Cayman Islands, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands and Turks & Caicos would be willing to compromise the value of their currency to the US$, in favour of a regional currency.

    Currently, Bahamas $1 = US$1.00; Cayman Island $1 = US$1.20; Bermuda $1 = US$1.00;

    As I have previously mentioned in this forum, in 2019……. 46 years after CARICOM was established in 1973……… member states have remained DIVIDED on issues relating to regional integration, CSME, West Indies cricket, UWI, LIAT and the CCJ.

    A perfect example of this divisiveness is the contribution of some CARICOM member states to the demise of REDjet… or being united on issues such as Venezuela.

    Just look at how Trump was easily able to manipulate the leaders of the Bahamas, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica and Saint Lucia, into siding with the United States in backing Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido as head of state, when he met with them at his private club in Palm Beach, Florida…… by “dangling investment.”

    He promised them that a high-level delegation from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the U.S. development lender, would visit their islands for investment purposes. Here we have 5 member states that “broke away” from other members of CARICOM, to support Guaido.

    CARICOM has also been unable to present a united position on a single common airspace, regional aviation challenges and inter-regional air travel, mainly because member states seemed obsessed with confronting problems by an island by island basis, rather than at a united regional level.

    Despite struggling to develop and implement policies to keep the airline viable and operational, LIAT’s shareholder governments have also remained divided on airline as well.

    AS USUAL, Antigua and Barbuda PM Gaston Browne “spoke out of turn” on an Antiguan radio station, when he announced that the government St. Lucia agreed to subsidise the operations of LIAT. SLU’s PM Chastanet immediately denied that report and remains adamant that he, similarly to previous SLU administrations, is not investing in the airline;

    ………St. Kitts & Nevis’ government has also refused to invest in the airline;

    ……..the Guyanese government has indicated they will not pay a huge guaranteed subsidy to LIAT, because a significant number of travellers continue to fly to and from Guyana.

    ……..the government of Trinidad & Tobago is willing to help LIAT, not by making any financial investment, but by possibly entering into an agreement with the state-owned Caribbean Airlines (CAL) regarding the maintenance of LIAT’s fleet. However, T&T seems to be a bit more concerned with seeing the demise of the airline so Caribbean Airlines could “pick up the slack.”


  50. @ Artax

    Yes I like you don’t see this occurring in any hurry either. The politics as usual will reign over what is financially a more prudent decision.

    The same reasons that caused the federation to fall apart and LIAT to fail as a commercial venture are sadly still with us today. I actually have to say I am impressed at how well the EC states have held together and as a result how their currency has been managed by the ECCB. This at least gives me some hope for the future of a united currency.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading