← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

st.johnpolyclinic1It rings hollow for sensible Barbadians to be expected to applaud government for completing the St. John Polyclinic 27 long years after it was first mooted. It is no mistake we have not referred to it by its official name, a subject for another blog.

[…]

Perhaps if we were building a gasification plant or some other complex that required a very technical design the long period taken could have been reasonably explained.  To have demanded airtime from CBC TV to broadcast the opening ceremony was a blatant disregard for the intelligence of Barbadians. Of course the obvious PR event would have served to make the DLP yard fowls crow.

It is also worth the mention that the construction of the St. John Polyclinic straddled both political parties. This fact ensures that the clinic deserves to be remembered as the proverbial political football of all projects in our post Independence period so far.  The BU household is pleased nevertheless the East is to be served by a state of the art health delivery unit so described at the opening by member of parliament for the constituency Mara Thompson (by the way Mara, the dibby dibby outfit worn by Oya was in poor taste for the event, especially compared to you, Esther and Maria). However, the willingness of BOTH political parties to have played politics with healthcare delivery should be of bigger concern.

In all the political rhetoric being spewed, how many will ask why has the clinic taken so long to be completed.  How many will ask what is the final cost to tax payers. How many will ask how will we prevent a recurrence by those entrusted to guard the public purse. How many will ask if the decision to complete the clinic aligns with a sustainable health care delivery strategy in Barbados.

What do we know about the dollars expensed by the government so far to shore up the legacy of the dearly departed David Thompson.

BU research reveals the original estimate to build the clinic was 16 million dollars and the final cost appears to be about 30 million dollars. The research further reveals it was originally to have been completed by this government in November 2012 when Donville Inniss was minister of Health yet here we are three years hence and a reported 100% overruns to add to  the inefficiency. Does this mean the DLP government does not have the moral and other authority to challenge the BLP on overrun projects of the past?

Those who had the opportunity to peek at the facility know the government will have to add to the 8 million dollar supplementary of 2015 and the several others tabled in previous years to properly equip  the clinic to deliver the state of the art health delivery Mara Thompson boasted about yesterday (20 November 2015).  The financial gymnastics of this government has become legendary. The government would have known final cost associated with the completion of the project in the 2015 financial year yet it is obvious it has purposely decided to go the supplementaries route. The decision to defer was obviously designed to massage the deficit number and deceive the ignorant. This is what is meant when some declare we cannot trust the Central Bank and by extension the minister of finance Chris Sinckler when speaking to the financial state of the Barbados economy. How many other projects have similar political decisions impacted.

It brings us to the matter of the 100% cost overrun of the St. John Polyclinic. Unfortunately the wing of the Auditor General is clipped and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is deserving of its earned reputation as another ineffective committee of parliament – a failing of the governance model fiercely defended by the traditionalist which has been exposed as irrelevant to the times. The opening of the St. John Polyclinic serves as an opportunity to review the wastage of public funds with zero accountability over the years by both political parties.

Why as an educated people we should accept that the project has incurred 100% overrun and there is no vociferous call by ALL Barbadians to account for every cent spent on the project from start to ‘finish’. The passive manner Barbadians appear to accept the cavalier approach by successive governments to table supplementaries to cover overruns needs to be challenged in a new dispensation. We all know the current system encourages corruption and successive governments have been unwilling to slam the door on the sucking of the nipples of the fatted calf, the greedy lot!

One is left to question why the planners of the clinic decided to construct a mill wall costing hundreds of thousand of dollars at a time when government is strapped for cash. Shouldn’t common sense have dictated the construction of such a wall – at this time –  scrapped from the design? Who is the project manager representing government who approved the construction of a mill wall. Who will explain to taxpayers why an irrelevant part of the design was approved given its significant cost. We have allowed our governments to be too cavalier with spending dollars from the public purse. It is OUR money NOT theirs. There appears to be no legislative philosophy to create tension on members of parliament to reduce the deficit devoid of financial gymnastics. Future generations will have to contend with a 9 billion dollar deficit and what do we have to show for it given the incremental increase in the last 6 years?

Last week  Caswell Franklyn column we discussed the challenge posed by government not ratifying (enacting in local law)  treaties/convention signed. In 2003 Barbados signed the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), the time is now to lobby for its ratification. The time has come for a new way to manage the business of government. The Political Class needs to be disrupted by a new way of doing business. We the PEOPLE must insist.  The Barbados Labour Party as the government in waiting has an obligation to show the population it is prepared to depart from the cronyism of the past. Mia Mottley has the opportunity to infuse the political landscape with an optimism to stem rising political cynicism.

Governments of the past had access to largess the umbrella of preferential treatment afforded, it is a different time. We have to suck from the knowledge pool our significant investment in education gives us.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

92 responses to “St.John Polyclinic, a Case of Political Corruption”


  1. Can anyone locate the operational cost in the last budget or in any supplementary since then for the polyclinic?


  2. @David;
    The Polyclinic was mooted over twenty years ago. The BLP was in power for 15 years. They have been in opposition for the past seven years. The BLP has chairmanship of the PAC. Matter fixed.
    Polyclinic opened. Dog dead! Polyclinic named after David Thompson, Appropriate!


  3. @Alvin Cummins

    It would be remiss of BU if we did not express our disappointment at your lack of questioning given yoru purported involvement in Public Unity Hearings in Barbados. Your reluctance to question this government on governance and related issues exposes you for a political yard fowl. You may have the final word.


  4. @Alvin Cummins November 20, 2015 at 9:27 AM #
    I find this thing very suspicious.

    You found David’s blog on a consumer’s complaint against Metal Craft “very suspicious”. Anything suspicious about the St. John Polyclinic, sorry let me give it its proper name the David Thompson Health and Social Services Complex.

    Any steel in dey?

  5. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Alvin…how much did it cost the taxpayers I beieve that is fair question and they have the right to know it’s their money paid for the clinic.


  6. The naked and most revealing truth shows clearly thst the Blp foot soldiers have sorely lost their souls along with digging a hole to bury themselves.

    Does the benefits outweigh the cost that is the quesion.Not the diversion and devious attempts of political opportunist being the rider on which to place and question cost.
    The long and short of the story are those question asking who will the clinic benefit and who are the beneficiaries


  7. “IT’S BEEN almost three decades in the making, but yesterday the people of St John, and St Joseph, St Philip and St George, too, finally got their polyclinic.”

    That is the opening line in the Nation’s story on this polyclinic. It is very telling!! That we believe a polyclinic located at the Glebe is a good investment shows our lack of strategic thinking and disregard for value for money.
    “..their polyclinic”?

  8. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Political play on words. Th poliicians would much prefer the people to believe that Thompson, his wife and Fruendl built the clinic from their owñ pockets and so would Alvin, it fits into their nasty vote pimping plans.

    Which ever party builds a sandcastle in Barbados, the taxpayers pay for the building and own it. Which ever foreign country builds hotels, airports etc in Barbados, bajans not even born yet will be paying for it and own it……..they use the taxpayers money to perpetrate political pimping and would be happy if bajans never found out…..right Alvin.


  9. Enuff
    I hope the day your BLP scoundrels ever decide to finish Greenland……they will remember to inscribe your damn name on the plaque…..as a stark reminder to all of your staunch support for garbage!


  10. The WTE would be up and perking Fractured, no need for Greenland.


  11. @ David,

    The “Mill wall” is the most Architecturally pleasing external element of the building.

    No project this size should take more than 2 years to build in Barbados.

    It is only the incompetence OR political interference of the 2 political parties that caused this debacle. 27 years ?

    Most of the Architects, Engineers and project managers are competent and qualified.

    Only government interference caused a 2 year project to take 27 YEARS.


  12. By the way, the dibby dibby outfit worn by Oya look like she was pick up on BaySt and somebody lend her a jacket , maybe the attired was a rebellious act and the smiling was self amusing, I await the ACs

  13. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Hants…that’s a real shame, disgusting that the current party is proud and the sidekick party is angry that they are not in the spotlight to be proud too. A real sideshow filled with idiots. I don’t know how they could be so proud of wasting taxpayer’s money for 27 years….must be something in the water.


  14. @David, Well Well, Miller and any applicable Yard ducks;

    The Cost? Check the estimates of expenditure and add in any supplementaries.

    It is the peoples’ money? It is their Polyclinic to be used by them. Not by people from Mars.

    It did not require 27 years to build, but the indifference of the party that held the reins of power for 15 years delayed its building. The negative nabobs can’t say that this promise was not kept. Many more promises will be kept. We have the patience

    From the days of slavery the Plantation bell, the windmill, and these symbols have to be shown to remind people of where we came from. It is aesthetic and appropriate.

    Dibby Dibby minds would concentrate on the Dibby Dibby skirt. Very small!

    Be specific about the “steel in day.” Contractor? Bajen. Worker? Bajen. Trucker? Bajen.
    All Bajan money…circulating. Cost? Paid workers in Barbados.

    Well Well, go to Mars. At the moment that is the only place you will not find “steel in dey.” Not saying it is right and should be encouraged, but we live in a real world, not the utopia your mind envisions.
    As the young people are won’t to say; “Get real.”

    Why do you people concentrate on what your grand children will be paying for? Let them look after themselves when the time comes. Do you know what WE are paying for from before? Concentrate on today and let the future look after itself when the “future” comes.

    @David:
    Re the last word; your skirt (red? Libby Dibby? ) is showing.

  15. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Fractured BLP November 21, 2015 at 3:28 PM #
    “Enuff
    I hope the day your BLP scoundrels ever decide to finish Greenland……they will remember to inscribe your damn name on the plaque…..as a stark reminder to all of your staunch support for garbage!”

    No need to inscribe his name on that toffee-less sinkhole when there is Cahill WTE for easy pickings. After all, that is what you have done to the Boardwalk on the South Coast.
    Richie Haynes would have been proud of the St. John Health & Social Complex being named after him. Even Edwy Talma would have been proud of a little recognition in Christ Church instead of Richie the Snow White Prime Minister who never was.

    So when are you going to name something after George Fergusson? Why not the Sugar Point Cruise Terminal?

  16. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ ac November 21, 2015 at 2:09 PM #
    “Does the benefits outweigh the cost that is the quesion.Not the diversion and devious attempts of political opportunist being the rider on which to place and question cost.”

    Should such a sound Cost/Benefit Analysis also be applied to the Dodds prison? The very prison you and the Governor of the Central Bank have been blaming over the past 7 years for the dwindling foreign reserves?

    Which is most important? A hotel or a country-side polyclinic or a PRISON?
    You decide!


  17. Wait ..they name it after a thief? Cuhdear…
    Congrats to the people of St John, pity it gine be stained by the name!
    Why not somebody dat wasn’t a lying tiefing scoundrel?
    Clico invoices like manna for the degenerate they named it after.
    No wonder the youth ain’t got no respect for the “tiefing class”.


  18. The disrespect for the edifice name after the lying crook is showed by his own daughter’s attire at the opening


  19. So far not a concern by commenters that neither political party has promised to make anti corruption laws a priority. This government promised but it was for the comfort if only fools. The media to be expected is being pushed towards the popular issues often manufactured by the politicians and cohorts.


  20. @ Watchman et al,

    Leave the young lady alone. She is not responsible for the sins of her parents if any.


  21. @David, ” promised to make anti corruption laws a priority”

    Another 27 years ????

    Politicians and big ups do not want the public to know what they are worth. plain and simple. Too many layers of connectivity.


  22. @Watchman (Another yard duck),
    If I call you a Yard duck does that make you one?

    Because you people (yard ducks) say David Thompson was a “tief” does that make him one? When was he convicted by a criminal court? It is not even the consensus of people, other than yard ducks, that he is what you say he was. He has done enough good work among the people that it should be named after him.


  23. @ David,
    Sorry for not going back as far as 2007. But some of it makes interesting reading such as:

    “It was heartening to hear the Democratic Labour Party issuing some political rhetoric designed to piggyback on the emotions which are currently running hot. All sensible Barbadians are aware that a DLP government if driven to office before the “ink dries” to use Thompson’s statement can do absolutely nothing about the merger if it is the desire of the shareholders. However it is refreshing to hear David Thompson nailing an issue in public which coincides with the Barbadian public.

    There was a time that the different statements being issued on the same subject from a Barbados Labour Party government would be in unison like the proverbial barber shop quartet. In recent times we have had Rawle “Diabolical Forces” Eastmond, Clyde “JAWS” Mascoll and Lynette “So Cold” Eastmond making statements which all combine to confuse Barbadians on the merger between BS&T and Neal & Massy and other matters.

    By the way, the Bay Street Marina was a Private sector aired by BS&T. How did it get to be included by Miller as a government initiative? A “promise” to be kept.


  24. Boy the PM sure told u blp apostles the truth in the video , no SHAME NO SHAME
    and still after fourteen years of turning the backs on the people ST john the BLP supporters arguing cost NO SHAME NO SHAME
    Guess the foot soldiers would have been in political adulation if THE DLP had followed the trade mark of political vindictiveness which the BLP dished on the St, John people just to have the pleasure of saying to the people of ST, John ‘we told you so
    However that was not to be and the govt did not stop short of making the polyclinic a reality in spite of economic challenges and major delays
    Yesterday was another proof of govt in action by making a promise to fulfill


  25. Catchment area? Public transport access? I foresee nuff taxi fares or under utilisation.


  26. @ Hants
    Unto his 4 and 5 generation ,she is not responsible for the sins of her father only the ill-gotten inheritance


  27. @ACs

    What good work ? starting Barbados in a free fall 6+ years to now,

  28. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Yes Alvin……the anti-corruption laws. I won’t want to have to go to Mars and return to Barbados and still no anti-corruption laws implemented. When Alvin, when.


  29. Wait they name the St. John polyclinic after Thompson in truth?The man who said I will not lie,cheat or steal?
    Alvin,what about the Clico cheque for 3.3 million that they tried to seal from the public and which judicial matter exposed Thompson and his madam to an unpleasant scrutiny?


  30. How easy is it for a poor man without private transportation to get to Gall Hill?


  31. The DLP finally completed a project and the hate is predictably coming out on here. What dibby-dibby outfit this author talking about. She looked very good to me. Jealous much!


  32. When will the powers that be see that there is merit in upgrading the centrally located Glebe Policlinic? Do they understand that for some people living in St. John it would take two buses to get to Gall Hill and one to get to the Glebe?


  33. Ignore the dibby dibby comment. Obviously some people do not know what dibby means.


  34. Kevin says, ” The DLP finally completed a project…..” LOL I can’t even deal with that one. Bushie, bring out the whacker! After all these years – A PROJECT!


  35. If I’m going to be a hater I’m going to hate somebody whose success is enviable. How many “projects” has Rihanna completed in the last few years? I think I’ll hate her.


  36. @ David ,
    Pray tell : What is the difference between the money the taxpayers have to pay Mr. Barak and the cost of The David Thompson Health and Social Services Complex?
    You also speak of Mia Mottley having a chance to “infuse” proper governance. She has been functioning as a MP for over twenty years; has been a Deputy Prime Minister , why has she not been able ,in such a long political career to effect any meaningful change?
    The simple truth is that for the people of St John to have been denied access to this facility for nearly three decades is a telling indictment on BOTH the BLP and DLP.
    Once again we see the bankruptcy of policy and ideas of these two political monstrosities in full action !


  37. Monstrosities indeed!


  38. “Polyclinic opened. Dog dead! Polyclinic named after David Thompson, Appropriate”

    if a highly educated man as you claim to be can consider the naming of the polyclinic after David Thompson as appropriate given the unflattering revelations unearthed in the CLICO investigations then the dog really dead in truth.


  39. @William

    Definitely a crisis of politics not only in Barbados but the Caribbean. We appear to be witnessing a decay in our societies.


  40. @ David
    The Caribbean?
    ….or is it the World?


  41. Firstly it is important that issues are put in their true perspective We all know of twistorians who have blurred necessary facts to forced a conclusion in order to depreciate the content or validity of valuable information in their novel remake of history barring the TRUTH
    The Truth the polyclinic was birth under a DLP administration for construction in 1990
    The truth is that the BLP cam e into office in 1994 four years after start of construction had a fourteen year term in Office and callously with punishing motives refused to continue the construction of the polyclinic
    Truth and Fact ,the DLP regains office fourteen years later and within a seven year period finished the polyclinic
    No if and/s or but/s


  42. Relevants Facts dealing with the History of The St John Polyclinic /Donville Inniss

    In giving a historical background of the polyclinic, Minister Inniss said that by 1990, the $6.1 million contract was awarded to Rayside Company for work to be completed in 72 weeks. However, due to economic challenges in the country, on February 25, 1992, the Government decided to suspend work at that polyclinic
    He noted that at the time, the DLP Government had spent over $2.3 million on the project and by February 1995 the BLP spent another $250 000 “providing security to a building that had no roof, no windows, no doors”.
    “By 1993, the number of people attending the Glebe outpatient clinic was 20 000. Over the years, the Ministry of Health has had to deal with the pressure on the Glebe Polyclinic, the Six Roads Polyclinic, Randall Phillips Polyclinic and the Sir Winston Scott Polyclinic. The people of St. John had to travel that far to get polyclinic services.”
    “In 1996, David Thompson, as your parliamentary representative, provided measures as to what he wished to see for the people of St. John in a new polyclinic facility here and that included a welfare office, skills training, day care for the elderly, disaster management office [and] library. So David Thompson envisaged that the St. John Polyclinic should not just be a health care facility, but provide much needed social services,” said Minister Inniss.
    “But the BLP could never find it fit to start work at the St. John Polyclinic and I say to you to the people of St. John, for 14 years, they did it out of spite, they did not care for you…,” he contended..
    “On May 16, 2008 David Thompson toured the site and gave further guidance on the future of St. John Polyclinic and the DLP administration, we engaged the consultants … and that polyclinic will be constructed.”
    Minister Inniss said that on January 6, 2010 a tender appeared for the construction and completion of the St. John Polyclinic. Fifteen companies collected the documents and ten companies tendered and those who tendered the prices ranged between $15. 9 million to $22.7 million.
    “The matter was considered by the tenders committee, who made their recommendation to the Ministry of Health a few months ago and since then we have sought permission from the Ministry of Finance a supplementary to acquire some funds to pay off the professional services outstanding as well as to commence work on the St. John Polyclinic this financial year.
    He said that he hoped that the re-commencement of the work would put the matter of the St. John Polyclinic to rest.


  43. What an idiot. It has taken less than a year to build the BWA headquarters on St. Barnabas. Instead of questioning how BOTH political parties gave misspent public funds, played politics with everything we have yardfowls par excellent who resort to the point, we finished it so all is well. So the status quo remains and the public is expected to meekly wait until the next project which stretches for say 30 years. How about asking for anti corruption legislation which. Tom Adams government tabled 40 years ago and died in committee. Now we have a DLP government who promised similar transparency laws in 100 days, seven years later …

    JAs


  44. The other point made in the blog the yardfowls will avoid. The cost to build the clinic was significantly funded supplementaries. There was no budget, there was no opportunity for the public to scrutinize expense items. Do we even have laws to demand accountability? O yes we do, the Auditor General, whose annual reports have been ignored by successive governance. Oops we have the PAC, whose work has been ignored by successive players.

    JAs


  45. David the idocy lies with those arrogant flame throwers supporters in the BLP who rather than accept and appreciate the opening of the clinic , goes on a political tangent of throwing salt where there is need for healing into what was a wounded project at the behest of playing political games to score points, there is were the idiocy lies,
    The Fact being that after so many years of stalemate especially done under the fourteen year reign purposely done( so) by the BLP the financial stakes would have become higher as economic and financial cost would apply with in each year that is a fact,. With out doubt one can also argue that any additional cost added to the ST,John polyclinic therefore should and can be blamed for the BLP closed eyed politics of retribution and vindictiveness which has placed the monetary distribution of the increased cost in the hands of the taxpayers,


  46. Even worse is the fact that THIS PARTICULAR DLP LOT were elected on campaign PROMISES and COMMITMENT to the people of Barbados, to CLEAN SHOP.
    …to pass Integrity and FOI acts WITHIN 100 DAYS….
    …to END the graft

    So ANY kind of justification based on what was done previously is idiotic, deceitful, malicious and downright insulting to the people who voted for them….
    ..and Bushie don’t like being insulted by people who stole CLICO money…

    Someone NEEDS to tell this to AC, Froon and Stinkliar in particular.


  47. David November 21, 2015 at 7:49 PM

    “So far not a concern by commenters that neither political party has promised to make anti corruption laws a priority………”

    CORRUPTION IS EVIL: DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN IT; DO NOT TOLERATE IT!

    Meanwhile in far flung places other countries are trying their best to legislate against corruption. They may not have a 100 percent success rate however they are trying their best. On a recent trip to East Africa, I was shocked to witness signs outside government buildings making it clear to the public that they do not facilitate those individuals who may attempt to offer bribes in order to gain favours.

    This approach is both refreshing and unambiguous. Owen, Thompson and Stuart should be held to account for the spread of corruption in our country. What is the point of being in power if you knowingly turn a blind eye to corrupt practices? Those leaders who have turned a blind eye to corruption in Barbados have sent out a clear message to the masses; in their eyes the practice of corruption within their government and private enterprises does not constitute an offence.

    We need to challenge our leaders and to ask them one-by-one what is their definition of the word corruption. You will be very surprised with their answers.

    http://www.eacc.go.ke/archives/speeches/SPEECH%20FOR%20THE%20CHAIRPERSON-%20LAUNCH%20OF%20EACC%20SP.pdf


  48. @ Boxcart, for it takes some people living in St. Philip two buses to get to the 6roads polyclinic so thats a non-issue. The Gall Hill polyclinic will take some pressure off of the same Glebe.


  49. @Kevin

    If the St. John clinic was meant to play such an important role don’t you think it would have been given priority by this administration? By the way what is your point about Gall Hill?

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading