How about CCJ and Myrie case for capers ?A first…..you bet and for a reason ..or an example….what of the cost…again at this time ?Why are all these things coming about at these times ? We have Alexandra teachers back on strike, CCJ Myrie issue right after a certain function at LESCC only last week,Almond closure coming 30th of this months, LIME workers ..we are yet to be informed of an outcome as promised,not forgetting the abominable CLICO and Barrack shot to the back burner…..real times and bad timing…in an election year of course.

Caswell; I see you’ve at last mentioned the the totally perverse tax which some posters have tried to highlight and you seemed to have shot down some time ago. i.e You should really be highlighting the fact that you would have already paid taxes on the contributions that were paid to NIS, and it is unconscionable to tax the benefit as well. The same argument goes for sickness benefits, pensions and all the other NIS benefits.

The bigger issue is where is the morality in taxing income previously taxed. Some thing which as checkit stated is systemic. No this is not the PDC.

I got interrupted again. The argument for implementing and enforcing the NIS pension tax is that Pensioners already have a substantial allowance and that the only ones caught in the additional NIS tax net are the ones with 2 pensions. However, this does not negate what should be the guiding principle that, having already paid taxes on contributions to the NIS, the benefits accruing from those taxed contributions should not be subject to new taxes. Government is taxing pensioners twice on the same monies.

one day coming soon, the people will wake up…

Time to blame all these nonsensical spendings and poor decision makings on somebody or no..something…. Global Economies??? How that sounds ?

Talk about quick time….that preliminary ruling in the Myrie case…boy that came back in record time…” Let’s get it on “of Marvin Gaye fame needs to be applied too in some cases..the AX and Barrack cases.. for too.

@ David
Since when OAS had anything to do with Global Economies….besides haven’t you heard salt fish in great demand nowadays ..

Owen come back and rule this country PLEASE. The country wants and NEEDS you URGENTLY.

Freundel, the ship is sinking…

“Too, even though previous uses of locally owned money by the government would also to some extent have involved the government using such ill-gotten proceeds to pay its own bills (loan interest, loan payments, rental accommodation – here and overseas – for electricity delivered, for business done for it, etc.), the fact is that those very huge TAX minuses were brutal and destructive in their nature and effects.

For example, as these wretched DLP/BLP governments TAXED portions of the incomes, payments, and transfers of the relevant people, businesses and other entities in the country, they did NOT involve themselves, at the same time as this evil TAXATION was being imposed, in any exchanging of monies for goods and services from any number of individuals, businesses and other entities in the country, and, as such, they would have been brutally destructively unnecessarily dismantling the incomes, payments and transfers of the relevant people, businesses and other entities in Barbados.

So, in spite of the fact that, generally, uses of such locally owned monies must come partly through EXCHANGES FOR GOODS OR SERVICES, LOCALLY/EXTERNALLY, the PDC must make the point still that there will continue to be far more severe production, exchange and financial problems for the country than normal, where there clearly exists NO CONNECTION OR RECONCILIATION between the government’s brazen use of ill-gotten money (ALTERNATIVELY TAXATION) – however much it is yearly – AS A MEANS OF REMUNERATING government workers and other recipients of government done transfers (ALTERNATIVELY SUBVENTIONS/SUBSIDIES TO PERSONS/REMUNERATIONS TO BUSINESSES), and the generic use of those portions of nominal incomes, payments and transfers (NOT MONEY THOUGH) (from out of the productive, commercial and social sectors ) that would have already been providing ( THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN PAYING FOR) and that still do provide themselves (THAT STILL ARE PAYING FOR), as some parts (financial) of the bases for which ALL such uses of money is done ( THE USE OF SUCH MONEY) including government’s use- of ill-gotten money, in the past, the present and in the future.

Such enormous redundancy and recurrency of esp. unproductive use of money will help to create in the foreseeable future a political nuclear type disaster for little Barbados if not properly combated at this stage!!!”

The above extract was taken from one of our documents. Such might have been posted on here before.

PDC

Tuesday….Washington…give a lecture while there visit IMF ..cost $19,876.23 first class.. (Thursday AX delivery.) ….Friday..back to Washington …to meet with US Diaspora to hub nub…then who knows where else while in the Nation’s Capital..back door of World Bank IMF……
Saving Saving Saving….tell me about it…talk about timing….

Remember Ax….the day of the new deal ? remember Myrie..yet there to boil ?By the way the Waterman Inquiry start yet ? ac…these are the things to which we refer….that YOU all approach John Public ..as if they never happened. People got more than enuff blunders to remember DEM by….