Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Douglas Leopold Phillips

Dr. Jerome Walcott, BLP Candidate for Christ Church South

“Dr. Walcott had the … audience cheering lustily and shouting approval when he called on all BLP members to by their words and actions show total loyalty to the party and be fully focused on defeating the DLP. He then got his loudest roar of support when he demanded that BLP Members of Parliament Group maintain unquestionable loyalty to the party, stressing that one of the reasons he was seeking office as Chairman was to give 100 per cent assistance and support to Political Leader Owen Arthur…” [BLP_news@blp.org.bb August 30th 2011]

The Incoming Chairman. This seems like the perfect title for a novel with immense literary potential. A novel that seeks to capture the constant churning and turmoil of a group of people destined to destroy each other. The main theme of the novel speaks to a tragedy of epic proportions. It’s a combination of greed and betrayal wrapped in the pretence of loyalty. We see a struggle taking place between the rival factions with a community of persons who once spoke to the text of unity and camaraderie, good governance and fair play. In this novel, we witness a fresh guard, in the person of a loyalist called Jerome. Jerome has a passion to serve and would do anything to ensure that his community is healed. His desire is so strong that he has opted to carry the fight to the other faction within the community. His desire and passion was wrapped in a virtue called loyalty. How did the old boss get Jerome to carry his political fire rage or is Jerome actually carrying his own rage? Questions of this nature can be explored in the novel.

In recent times, the small political class, within the community has spoken, and sought to dismiss any notion of a return to power by Mia. Now, Mia is seen as the other leader within the community. She possesses a fire in the belly to see the community grow. This desire is demonstrated in her constancy of getting up on each occasion she has been knocked down. One has lost count of the times she has been floored by her former boss now her political antithesis.

This tragedy that has befallen the community has spurred an intense amount of infighting within the Councils of the community. The race to influence the selection of the full slate of community leaders in the 30 designated constituencies has taken a new twist. Persons who courted areas for well over five years are publicly been told that their services and efforts may be over looked for brighter sparks. This in itself is an entire dynamic, especially, when the persons at the centre are flying in the face of domestic opposition. We cannot close our eyes to the potential intrigue that the novel has the potential to generate.

How can two persons, in such a small space, be always at each other’s neck? This constant political machination is the root of the intrigue. We thought with hugging, kissing and making up that some tempers would have cooled. It is clear that instead of cooling they are now at a very tense level. The scenarios for the ending of this novel are extremely gripping. Let’s assume, Jerome wins and further entrenches his old boss as the political architect of a new hopeful attempt of regaining unity in the community. What would become of Mia? Is this the end of her political ambitions? Will the old political boss succeed in delivering the final political blow without even participating in the bout? If Mia wins, will she seek to garner the support of the rank and file? Will she seek to advance the necessary constitutional changes to ensure members of the community have a bigger say in what the political class has authority over? Or will Mia finally end this sordid love affair that has come to characterise the community to the point of total fracture.

The Novel ..In coming Chairman is due for consideration in October 2011. The discussion on publication will take place somewhere in Roebuck Street. We patiently wait.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

  1. Mia Putting Money in People’s Pockets “NOW” when it Really Matters Avatar
    Mia Putting Money in People’s Pockets “NOW” when it Really Matters

    The evidence is simply overwhelming! Despite Barbados being in a bitter recession, Mia Mottley is putting money in people’s pockets, thereby helping them to cope and keep body and soul together: “NOW,” when they are said to be struggling to stay above water. The very simple point is: ‘recession or not, with Mia Mottley, Barbadians will have money to spend.’ That is certainly really great news. The evidence is right there!

    HERE IS GOOD POLITICS: After 108 years of existence and earlier this year, the re-elected President of FIFA vowed to take urgent steps to stamp-out corruption – allegation of which has been plaguing that organization for some time. Before that, and long before President Obama established the Bowles/Simpson Committee or America established a bipartisan committee to look at the economy, Mia Mottley had also made a similar call in Barbados. Then on September 29th 2010, while addressing the Barbados Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) Mia Mottley shared her vision for a new development model for Barbados.

    ON THE SOCIAL SIDE, during the St. John By-election held in January, Mia Mottley called on persons with the financial capacity to do so, to: “Adopt a Family,” and help them through this difficult economic period. It was therefore refreshing when – within recent days, I read that the richest people in Germany, America, France and Spain are now encouraging their respective Governments, to tax them more, to help the wider society. Mia Mottley is clearly – way ahead of her time.

    A breath-taking development model:

    In recent weeks and without fuss or fanfare, Mia Mottley launched a social development programme, which will put hundreds of thousands of dollars in the pockets of ordinary Barbadians, during this recession. That football tournament (of which she is said to be one of the main organizers) seems like an aspect of an even broader and more comprehensive development initiative, which she continues to build-out and which seems to form part of her plan for: “A new, just and well ordered Barbadian society and green economy.’

    It would seem that instead of pointing fingers and seeking to blame the Government for the current recession, Mia Mottley has taken the laudable decision to put money in the pockets of families, which will help them pay their bills, buy food and send their children to school, while also helping them cope and keep body and soul together.

    That she is able to execute a lucrative football tournament or such a massive social development programme during a bitter recession and while in Opposition – think how much more she would be able to accomplish – in your name and on your behalf – if she was leading the BLP (Administratively) or Barbados in general. I say: “administratively: because the BLP already has a “Political Leader.”

    It is also clear that the new, unmatched progressive development model, which Mia Mottley continues to roll-out – is far superior to the DLP’s tired ‘societal model,’ which is clearly not working or the obsolete economic model now in existence because her’s is one that seeks to (1) truly empower; transforms and truly change the circumstances of people, (2) make them better far more responsible; independent and productive citizens with new core values, while (3) promoting new patterns on ownership in our country.

    The football tournament therefore meets all the criteria of a sound social and economic development initiative because it focuses on people and contains elements of poverty prevention and also has the capacity to serve as ‘a crime prevention strategy,’ since it will ‘strengthen relations within and across communities.’ It would seem that Mia’s approach also promotes: ‘good health and wellness; discipline; skills and personal development; trust; mutual respect and team work’ – fundamental core values, which are vital to even Barbados – overcoming many of the challenges it currently faces.

    Most impressive is its capacity to spur economic activity, as well as the social development assistance it offers to individuals, which is complemented by monetary incentives to promote self and skills development. The individual benefits, the community benefits and Barbados benefits. And, for that – Mia Mottley must be highly complemented for ‘staying focused’ and, ‘for putting people first’ and ‘money in their pockets during this bitter recession,’ of course when it really matters.

    But as you know, football has been played in Barbados for years, so what is different this time around? MIA MOTTLEY! When Mia Mottley is involve or gets involve even ordinary people become winners. People in communities all across Barbados can therefore go to bed and rest comfortably knowing that, recession or not, whether you are BLP, DLP or Independent, as long as Mia Mottley has anything to do with it – you will have money in your pocket and money to spend.


  2. A comic at work


  3. Of course Mottley got moneyto blow on football after all her share from the prison and road works and the tickets sold to VECO for her lesbian limes is still sitting in her offshore bank account in the Cayman islands


  4. Douglas Leopold Phillips, a little piece of advice. If you want to capture the imagination of young voters you will have to change your name. Nobody under the age of 40 identifies with a guy called Douglas Leopold.

    How about Damien Larique or something so?


  5. Approaching one year since BLP power-hungry opportunists ousted Mia Mottley

    October 18th is the 1st Anniversary of the plot

    Owen Arthur is “under tremendous pressure to ensure he attracts more people” to public meetings than Mia Mottley did when she was BLP leader.

    Unfortunately for Goin wid Owen, folks remember that as Leader of the Opposition, Mia Mottley attracted THOUSANDS to her meetings. That’s just not the case now with Mr. Arthur who often finds himself talking to more empty chairs than people. Some of his backroom advisors are getting a little nervous and well they should.

    “In our opinion, Prime Minister Freundel Stuart doesn’t have to win the next election: he just has to wait for Owen Arthur to lose it.”

    “When Owen Arthur, George Payne, Dale Marshall and Jerome Walcott travelled to the Ermie Bourne Centre at Hillaby St. Andrew, on Sunday, August 28th 2011 for a meeting – they succeeded in doing three things. With the first anniversary approaching, they gave Barbadians another opportunity to see the chief architects of the plan, who ousted Mia Mottley as Barbados’ first female Leader of the Opposition, on October 18th 2010…”

    “…What is the BLP’s cause now and what is its message? It simply cannot be that the BLP wants to form the Government! BLP members must not allow themselves to get “accidental false hope” deliberately. Even if the DLP was losing popularity, that would not result in an automatic electoral victory for the BLP.”


  6. Damien Larique a piece of advice.

    The prose too purple. I stopped reading after the first paragraph.

    How about hiring someone some bright young spark who can write simple, elegant, beautiful prose?

    Since DLP has been around for decades surely there is enough money in the kitty to hire a good writer (maybe someone like me?)


  7. “The Incoming Chairman” seems like the perfect title for a great novel which
    captures the turmoil of people destroying each other. The main theme addresses a tragedy, a combination of greed and betrayal and false loyalty. A struggle is taking place between rival factions in the same party.

    See.

    My 3rd form teacher taught us to be short and sweet.


  8. Even if the DLP was losing popularity, that would not result in an automatic electoral victory for the BLP.”

    @ from /
    You are talking nonsense


  9. In response to the CBC sacking of Peter Wickham here is what David BU posted on Wickham’s Facebook Wall a moment ago:

    A question Peter, are you a member of the BAJ? Can we look forward to an article from you about the importance of protecting freedom of expression in a democracy? Remember you were told when the Nation newspaper refused to carry an article or two a couple general elections ago that you and other media players are simply creatures of the system,. A cynical view perhaps or is it a realistic one?

    God speed!

  10. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    This is going to be interesting.

    Who will attract the most people.

    Owen’s meetings or Mia’s football?


  11. @CCC

    Tell us about why the CBC fired Wickham.


  12. @CCC

    Your are truly exposing your feathers, there is nothing in that report which Peter has not written about in his articles through the years.

    In fact Peter has been one of the few social commentators who has written exhaustively about the need for campaign financing.

    What is new except that David Thompson is gone, Mia is gone and we have a new guard.

  13. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    DAVID

    Then I take it that you have no problem with a fifth columnist in your midst.


  14. Just remember what goes around comes around.


  15. who is the deputy prime minister of barbados ?
    how long will it take for us to be told ?
    do we have to change the law to get a deputy prime minister


  16. @Just Asking

    Minister Ronald ‘Demons’ Jones is the de facto Deputy Prime Minister.

    Is a deputy required under the law any way?

    You are correct though, from a political strategy position, a deputy is essential.


  17. cant peter get a ZR drivers licence , buy a taxi, sell ground provisions, sell insurance (oh no !) or sell nuts ??
    doesnt the ‘nut man’ make good money ?
    isnt the nut man from st vincent?
    if a st vincent nut man can make it in Barbados , cant a bajan nut man or snocone vendor make in Barbados ?
    cant peter just leave barbados and find work ?


  18. Interesting! Freundel can act quickly when the party appears to be seriously threatened. There has to be more to this story than has been told so far. Hmmm…. Is it in Peter Wickham’s interest to fight this? Did his apparent non-adulatory views of Freundal vis a vis Sinckler have anything to do with the summary action?

    …….. and what about the ongoing FIFA story and the missing CLICO assets? How come no BU article on these potentially big stories?


  19. @checkit-out

    Are you serious?

    Did you comment on the CLICO story posted a few days ago? Does anyone care except those who want to make a political yarn?

    Have we not blogged about Jack and this matter?

    Are we not on record saying it is stupid for Ronald Jones to wear two caps?

    Checkit.out no need to be snide.


  20. David; surely you meant in your post above that Ronald Jones is the defacto DEPUTY prime MInister of Barbados. That was a slip of the typing fingers? Right?


  21. @checkit

    Yes it was a slip.


  22. David; Re. your 10.16 am post.
    What CLICO story posted a few days ago? Looks like I missed it or alzheimers is setting in. Please point me to it again.

    Re, the FIFA story, the Jack Warner aspects of the matter seems to have played themselves out but the story of Barbados’ reps being summoned to a meeting in the Bahamas is current. I don’t recall it being blogged about here. But again I might have missed it. I don’t visit here and check all the topics as often as I used to.


  23. @checkit-out

    What is there to blog about the two Barbados reps being called to a meeting?

    Here is the link to the blog posted on the 23 Aug.

    http://bajan.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/will-clico-policyholders-soon-have-reason-to-smile/


  24. David;

    Thanks for the link. I had somehow missed it. I now wonder what kind of solution Chris Sinckler had in mind, when he was making his budget statement wrap-up, in declaring the good news of an imminent settlement of the CLICO matter. Would the Government (i.e. the People of Barbados) now have to underwrite the very substantial missing CLICO assets in funding that solution?


  25. @checkit

    A good question. The message from the judicial managers about missing assets and the good news story which minister Sinckler sent during his budget wrap up seem to be conflicting.


  26. The longer this CLICO story goes on the more sordid it’s going to end up. Things that start bad don’t usually end good, unless a large sum of money is thrown at it. In this case, there’s no large sum of floating money to spare.

    As for Wickham, a four (4) line dismissal letter is begging for trouble in the realm of politics and perception.

  27. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    DAVID

    Another blackman making an ass of himself.

    First it was GLINECLARKE with his RACIST remarks in our Parliament.
    Now bonehead WICKHAM selling out his own black people to the Americans.

    I wonder if black people will ever learn.


  28. CCC

    What selling out what? Where did he sell out anyone? Bullfaeces!


  29. What is the essential charge against Peter Wickham?

    Was it that he consistently provided information on corruption in Caribbean Governments to the US Embassy here?

    Do the facts presented so far suggest that Wickham provided information on Barbados’ Government corruption to the Embassy? What I’ve read so far says no and indeed they suggest that Wickham was careful in providing information on corruption in other Caribbean countries, Not Barbados.

    The facts also suggest that the Wikileaks information now being suggested as the reason for Wickham’s firing predated the DLP coming into power.

    Does this seem like something for which the current Government would fire a reasonably influential avowed supporter?

    Was this therefore a preemptive strike by the current Government to stave off the issuance of current information on corruption in Barbados that could be very damaging to the DLP?

    Could there be very much more in the mortar thn the pestle?


  30. @checkit.out

    What about the fact that Peter is known to be a Chris Mia sympathizer?


  31. Speaking of Wikileaks it has just released thousands of cables in which names have not been redacted. Formerly it tried to protect individuals who had spoken to US State Dept. officials but who lived in unfriendly countries e.g. Iran. But due to a dispute between Wikileaks and one of their media collaborators (the Guardian) it has now released the whole kit and caboodle.

    This has put it on a direct collision path with the journalism body “Reporters without Borders” who fear that some of their colleagues lives or security may be in danger.

    If the Gov’t run CBC fired Wickham because of his speaking to US officials about corruption in the Caribbean, then it says more about the Gov’t than it says about Wickham. If a Gov’t is concerned about corruption why dismiss a “whistle blower”?

    Wikileaks and Julian Assange should also face some serious scrutiny, if the sources of its content are whistle blowers why destroy the Goose that laid the golden egg?

    If I was a whistle blower the last organization I would speak to is Wikileaks, they have destroyed whatever integrity they had left. I think that any support that Assange had is rapidly evaporating and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are few voices of protest when he is eventually carted off to the US to face their justice..

    BTW if anyone at Peter Wickham is the only credible person in Barbados who spoke to US State Dept officials I have a private island to sell them off Barbados, it’s called Pelican Island.


  32. @Sarge

    The Wikileak source is that soldier boy who provided access to US cables and not the names listed therein.


  33. David

    I knew that, but prior to the “soldier boy” they received information from other whistle blowers but the US State Dept. cables was the big enchilada. Wikileaks agreed with the newspapers that they would not release any information that would compromise subjects living in countries e.g. Iran and China so essentially they have broken that agreement.

    I don’t think you are looking at the big picture, what is the difference between a whistle blower who speaks to the US State Dept or a whistle blower who leaks info to Wikileaks?

    None, but that just my opinon.


  34. @ checkit.out
    Quote
    “Do the facts presented so far suggest that Wickham provided information on Barbados’ Government corruption to the Embassy? What I’ve read so far says no and indeed they suggest that Wickham was careful in providing information on corruption in other Caribbean countries, Not Barbados.’
    Ends Quote

    It would appear as though you are the only person who read and understood the Wikileak reports. Reading the comments from
    some of the BU bloggers and almost all of the BFP bloggers, I thought that there were other data published which I might have missed. Thanks for your input. Now I know that my four eyes are working. lol.

    @ David

    Quote
    ‘What about the fact that Peter is known to be a Chris Mia sympathizer?’
    End quote

    The last time I saw a ball like the above delivery was from Muralitharan to Brian Lara at the Galle in Sri Lanka but it was dispatched over cover for 6. It was a beautiful ball but Lara was down the wicket in a hurry and committed to the cover drive. Had he missed or mistimed it , he would have been out. I will wait and see if there are any Laras in the BU family. lol.

    Oh how I enjoy the BU exchanges!!. The other people ain’t saying nuttin. lol


  35. Peter, welcome back to Brasstacks.


  36. on Tuesdays and Thursdays


  37. If It it is true that Peter Wickham was giving “sensitve information to the USA government, I expect he would have done it for a really good reason.

    We should wait to hear his “explanation”.


  38. To All:
    Am I reading correctly; was Peter Wickham spying for the US Government. Yes if what is being said here is true then he was a spy. Did he recruit Mia Mottley too?


  39. The normal Freundel decision making process seems to be; Cogitate – mull things over some more – discuss possible action with relevant cabinet members – let things come to a head and then act. That process was apparently short circuited, given the apparent speed of the decision making and action. Why? Was Chris Sinckler kept out of the loop on this one?

    The wikileaks leak, linked on BFP, doesn’t appear to suggest that Wickham was spying or providing information on Barbados’ corruption per. se although he was evidently doing so on his clients in the other Islands. Did CBC act merely on the principle that its consultant should not provide to third parties any analytical insights related to corruption by its former or current clients and garnered in the process of a consultancy even if that information is essentially in the public domain and presumably of little relevance to Barbados. The action would therefore be to stave off the possibility of a future similar provision of information to the US embassy in which Barbados’ corruption could figure and to show Barbados’ Government solidarity with its neighbours.

    Interesting times.


  40. It seems a government which was washed into power on an agenda of transparency should feel obligated to advise the taxpayers and soon to be electorate why it fired its political consultant at the CBC.

    A four line resignation letter demonstrates a continuing uncouthness and arrogance which we thought was behind us.

    @checkit-out

    Do you mean cogitate or meditate?


  41. Cogitate, which is synonymous with meditate.


  42. David; Perhaps what it was washed into power with, was CLICO’s money and the Bajan’s electorate feeling that three terms was more than enough for any government. Given Stuart’s somewhat secretive style do you think it is likely that he will say more on this matter than he absolutely has to?

    What transparency what?


  43. @checkit-out

    What do you think will be the theme/agenda of this government come next general election?


  44. What did Wickham say in those cables that are not to the point if not factual? This is precisely what goes on in these islands of ours. As we say in mine Sungu not better than Lungu.
    Politicians around here need to clean up their acts and remember they are our servants and not the other way ’round. Even when they get elected on a “need for transparency platform” they promptly forget. Even after two terms they keep promising. In mine there is a requirement that campaign contributions be declared to the elections office by a certain time, and it is obvious that there is no corelation between the amounts received and spent.


  45. @ David/CheckitOut

    Letters of dismissal are usually four lines or less. If there is a fifth line, it tells the dismissed worker to leave the keys of the company’s vehicle with the security guard. It would appear as though you guys are self-employed and not privileged to see letters of dismissal in the private sector.I believe that the young gentleman was a contract worker and if the period of the contract was breached, he would be compensated accordingly. I have never heard about transparency (the true reason for dismissal) in the termination of a contract worker’s services whether it is in the private or public sector.


  46. You Bajans continue to amuse me; it was once said that in Barbados it was VERY easy for the US to obtain information. All they needed to do was to wave a GREEN CARD or a long term visa. Some one need to find out what Peter Wickham got. He is not the first or will he be the last. We once had a Permanent Secretary and wife team actually providing government documents. That was in Tom Adams time. When the PS retired he worked in the security section of the embassy here. Maybe the US did not know that we knew.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading