Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Dr. Jerome Walcott, General Secretary
Dr. Jerome Walcott, General Secretary

There is the popular cliché – you should never let a good crisis go to waste. When leader of the Opposition Mia Mottley was forced to withdraw from running for the Chairmanship of the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) in 2011,

[…]

she was bold to say then that her political party needed to democratize the process of selecting delegates – see Mia Mottley Accuses The Barbados Labour Party Of Reducing The Rights Of Women And Young People And Announces Her Withdrawal From the Race To Contest Chairmanship. Mia Mottley was again installed as the leader of the Opposition in 2013, and presumably control of the BLP, yet Barbadians have seen no inclination by her that she intends to usher in reform by amending the BLP constitution to reflect her views during the pre 2011 period.

Barbadians understand that in the current landscape a strong BLP, therefore a strong Opposition, is important to championing the cause of democracy under our system of government. We suffered through the Thompson/Mascoll conflict and appreciate how political party conflict has the potential to unsettled the country. Unlike many BU is not caught up (to use Bishop Wilfred’s words) in BLP or DLP rhetoric. BU subscribes to the view that in the same way the best performing organizations map strategy and execute to maintain competitiveness in response to the environment in which it operates, so too a country has to constantly modify how it wants to be governed given the changing landscape. We currently rely on a political system that is responsible for foisting candidates on the people for selection. There is enough evidence to show that it is a system easy to manipulate by those with agendas which often run counter to those of the PEOPLE. We need to make it better.

The unfolding conflict in the Christ Church West constituency which sees elected candidate Dr. Maria Agard pitted against her Executive and Party is interesting. It is obvious Agard is not highly regarded by Mottley and there is an orchestrated effort to deselect Agard from running in the next general election. It is obvious to BU she has not performed any worse than other candidates on the BLP side.

Why does Mottley want to jettison Agard? Why is Dr. Agard not being defended by others in the party? Are they waiting for the right moment to give Mottley the boot, again?

Several BU sources have confirmed at a recently held BLP Executive meeting Dr. Agard was given instructions to avoid issuing statements to the media. We will have to wait to see if she complies with the gag order.  What is evident if we listen to pollster Peter Wickham and others who have unrestricted access to the media space, there is an orchestrated attempt to trivialize Agard’s concerns. How the hell does Wickham know Jerome Walcott’s political future  unless he has intimate knowledge? His agenda was exposed by Bishop Wilfred Wood who took him to task on talk radio this week. Another source advised BU that Nation newspaper political columnist and Sunday Sun Editor Albert Brandford and Carol Martindale will publish a feature in tomorrow’s Sunday Sun to show Walcott is the preferred candidate for the Christ Church West (we wait to read tomorrow’s issue to confirm).  We hope we are wrong because if true it will confirm what we already know.

One of the distinguishing features of a leader of men and women is the ability to get them to share in your vision.  If differences exist an effective leader will find a practical way to resolve in the best interest of the whole. Ever since Mia Mottley assumed the leadership of the BLP it has become a fractious affair. Barbadians deserve to know what Mottley has against Agard in much the same way we deserve to know what Arthur has against Mia. The feeble mutterings by her acolytes that Agard has not performed as member of Christ Church West is bullshit.

.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

85 responses to “Christ Church West Going South”


  1. Dompey the JA is now blogging as dodds…


  2. …mouthings of……


  3. Why is it that everything Mia touch turns to sawdust. God help all if she becomes PM


  4. ac October 13, 2015 at 5:01 PM #

    AC, I believe the consortium should consult with each other, discuss what you are going to write on the subject, gather your facts in an effort to avoid being open to scrutiny and then articulate your points. Instead you come with a lot of “willy nilly” shiite passing it off as intellectual political discourse.

    The “internal rumblings” within the BLP “for the past six and a half years” you refer to, are not unique to that party. Surely you must admit that, presently, there are “internal rumblings” within the DLP as well. They had the situation with the “eager 11,” the constant out-bursts from Estwick, Donville Inniss often contradictory statements, the circumstances surrounding why Ronald Jones was replaced by Richard Sealy as acting PM when the occasion arises; Kellman and the list goes on.

    Obviously, the DLP wants to create the illusion whereby these issues have been “aborted or dissolve in a timely fashion through the good leadership of PM Stuart (another illusion).” But we all know that this is not the case, especially since they have a two seat majority, this creates a situation where any attempt to discipline members may be detrimental to the party.

    Additionally, while in opposition, the DEMS also had their fair share of “internal rumblings” for a PERIOD OF 13 YEARS, which the party’s hierarchy was unable “to dilute in a peaceful manner in avoidance of fractions or division within the party.”

    Kellman was his own faction within the party and in parliament (remember he and Thompson were not on speaking terms as the only two members of a then opposition); Thompson joined forces with his faction to eventually overthrow Mascoll by a “political coup d’état”; Mascoll obviously had his own faction as well as the elder party faithful.

    These situations “spilled on to the public arena with questions being asked about (Thompson’s) leadership ability and his incapacity to control” members of the party, since an opposition does not have bona fide “ministers.”
    The situation presently occurring within the BLP, also creates a situation whereby people would question, and rightfully so, Mottley’s ability to control her members and effectively enforce a system of good governance.

    After 13 years of “internal rumbling,” which caused Barbadians to question that party’s ability to implement a good governance system, the DEMS were “seemingly” able to mend the fences on the EVE of a general election, presented a “united party” to the Barbadian electorate and went on to win the 2008 elections.

    Fortunately, the DLP left an example that Mottley could learn from. The present system of POOR GOVERNANCE, as demonstrated by the DLP, is symptomatic of and exemplifies the fact that political parties, after experiencing years of internal conflict, are often incapable of exhibiting good governance. There are still underlying remnants of conflict existing within the party.

    The DLP has proven this fact and Mottley would do well to learn from their example. Because if the BLP were to win the next general election, they would be just as incompetent as or even worse than this present DLP administration.


  5. Yes to “rumblings” past and present in the DLP
    However i also stated that whatever rumblings they were in the past six years within the DLP camp they were handle with quietness and quickness.
    A leadership skill that Mia has yet to demonstrate in quelling the murky waters that rolls on to the public domain.


  6. ac
    Dare you to compare Mia and Stuart?Beyond comparison.Mia understands Real Politik.Can you see her reading a eulogy from reams of paper like Stuart did at his sister’s funeral service.It tells me two things immediately.First he neither trusts his memory or his thought process is disorderly.Secondly,he really knows nothing about his sister.A real political leader is a skilled orator and with the aura of charisma that Stuart would dream of having.You can’t deny that Mia is possessed of both in abundance,that’s why she has what it takes to lead.


  7. Ammm Since the BLP foot soldiers have been consistently critical of PM Stuart leadership
    I dare any one (of you) to point me in the direction where for the past six years Mia has shown an astute aptitude in guidance and strong leadership of the BLP


  8. Voting ac comment down is not the answer , You Gabriel speak about comparison, Now ac asked of you for the evidence to defend all you said in your comment Bring the proof ,


  9. Gabriel,

    Do not engage the ac’s…….they got talk for the BLP. How is this Mia’s fault if the MP has problems with her elected executive? I think the executive should resign and leave her alone.

    Let ac deal with the problems in the DLP. Fruendel Stuart’s cabinet sits in meetings with him every Thursday and they could not talk with him. They had to go behind his back and plot to overthrow him because they said they could not talk to him. In fact he does not enter the room until all of them are gathered.

    Not only did they meet and plot to overthrow him, the bastards also had a plan to offer him the post of GG saying that post would suit him as he does not like to communicate with ordinary folk………(Can anyone imagine had this plot not been exposed….seeing Fruendel as GG visiting centenarians?)

    Yea, I know the ac will say that they won but at what cost? Estwick is a time bomb!


  10. Oh well here comes that pot starved political mongrel one prodigal nipping at ac/s feet .with attack after attack,,
    any how the same “challenge ” i throw to Gabriel i pass to you bring the proof of “comparison.
    Needless to say Mia has a long history compiled and comprise of fourteen years of active duty to this country much of which you can obtain as proof,
    Not so ,just asking.


  11. ac
    I gave you two.You want more?St Philip South rejected him.He ran to St Michael South and got rejected .Mia lost once,first outing and never looked back.He took away Urban so he could build condos for his constituents.The condos finish almost 2 years,Madoney get pay,and not a tenant in situ.What leadership is that?


  12. When Freundel was a Senator, he used to talk a lot of black/white nonsense.

    I am appalled that as a black PM, he fell into the same trap as his former leader………you do not hear him talking anything about black/white nonsense now that he is in a position to help redistribute the wealth. He assists in concentrating the wealth into the big white businesses.

    He does not speak a word about the 40% of government contracts that were to go to the small black man……………and the small black people still vote for these deceivers?

    By the way………who imported the big BWA tanks so soon? Who installed them?


  13. i told you that the bkp foot soldiers had and have plenty cricisms of Stuar leadership
    All (you) have done is to continue more of the same, but is of yet to show or bring any evidence or proof which can demostraye Mia abilty and performance as having strong or stronger enough leadership than Stuart
    Just a reminder telling me what (you) know about Stuart as a leader does not in anyway make a good enough defense of Mia leadership,
    Oh on your other point to do with election victory or mainstream politics those two issues are co -joined to public preference and/or financial stability ;
    In your eatlier comment i did not bother to respond because it was almost a joke to accuse a grieving person of having a lack of leadership due to the method and the way the individual dealt with the circumstances,


  14. And to you Prodigal you sound so foolish , go find Mia and tell her that YOU having a hard time defending her leadership of the BLP as there is not one iota of evidence which you can presented that demonstrate good leadership of the party on her behalf after six years as the leader ,,HA! HA! now how is that for a good campaign slogan

    MIA CANT LEAD HER PARTY> THEN HOW CAN SHE LEAD THE COUNTRY? Six years and counting


  15. Word on the ground they will be plenty dog dumplings in Mia soup in the run up to the next election..


  16. I heard today of the passing of Kathleen Noott,widow of Major Noott,after a brief illness, age 99.May she rest in peace.


  17. Gabriel,

    Is that really all it takes to lead – charisma and skill in oration?


  18. Firstly, you cannot compare Stuart’s leadership skills as a Prime Minister with that of the Opposition leader, without taking into consideration that there are three aspects to Stuart’s leadership. He has to lead the DLP, his ministers and the affairs of Barbados.

    As it relates to the leadership of his ministers, he has been unable, for example, to “muzzle” David Estwick and Donville Inniss, both of whom always contradict anything Stuart says.
    Estwick plays out his disagreements with Stuart and the DLP in the press. Stuart spoke about “citizenship by investment,” and Inniss said he was not in favour of such a policy. Then there is the situation with Denis Lowe. Why is it that every ministry he has presided over always has some sort of controversy, yet he remains a minister? Stuart admitted there were “procedural mis-steps” surrounding the retrenchment of the former NCC employees, yet Lowe remains a minister.

    Obviously, you DLP yard fowls would be satisfied with Stuart’s leadership of the party. But the quality of his leadership of the DEMS would have been greatly tested if the party had a 5 or 6 seat majority. As it stands now, no member of the DLP is willing jeopardize their chances of receiving a pension.

    In terms of his leadership skills relative to Barbados, Stuart has failed tremendously. If you think lying to Barbadians; protecting crooks like Leroy Parris; signing secret deals with CAHILL, allowing Michael Carrington to remain Speaker after withholding his former client’s property; retrenching public sector employees while maintaining the largest cabinet in the history of Barbados; refusing to communicate with Barbadians (unless he is insulting someone or addressing a constituency branch meeting); procrastinating; referring matters to commissions of enquiry or non-existent ERTs.

    Stuart’s biggest failures have been refusing to implement ITAL, a code of conduct for ministers and declaration of assets.

    However, I agree with your comment re: “MIA CANT LEAD HER PARTY> THEN HOW CAN SHE LEAD THE COUNTRY?”

    During the days of the DLP’s “internal rumblings” a similar comment could have been attributed to Thompson as well. And it has been proven correct, because during the past 6 and a half years, Thompson was unable to lead the country, during the duration of his illness Barbados came to a “stand still,” meaning there was no one within the ranks of the DLP that were capable of leading the country, and now Stuart has proven he is unable and incapable of leading the country as well.


  19. Donna
    That might be your understanding of it.Perhaps the German people and Churchill among others were initially carried away with those attributes in a mass murderer post ’33.


  20. And to You I say that recitation you gave as commentary has been heard many times
    Furthermore your level of discourse avoids the vexing question pertaining to Mia leadership which becomes magnified especially given the fact of the many dogging debacles
    You have attempted to infuse that the close election can be of credit her. However I would most likely believe that what transpired could be more credited to Arthur and his die hard followers
    Yes that Stuart govt would have difference to policies but not of a magnitude to cause ongoing division


  21. It seems as though the consortium has brought out George Pilgrim to reply.

    “And to You I say that recitation you gave as commentary has been heard many times”

    Recitation or not, my comments are TRUE, and a lot more can be added. Stuart has been an abysmal failure as a leader and will go down in history as the worst PM Barbados ever had. Talking shiite and quoting Chaucer, Shakespeare or Greek philosophers and talking “over people’s heads” or insulting them, does not make Stuart a good leader.

    “Furthermore your level of discourse avoids the vexing question pertaining to Mia leadership which becomes magnified especially given the fact of the many dogging debacles”

    The above comments do not make any sense. There is only ONE aspect of Mottley’s leadership and that is as Opposition leader, while Stuart has THREE aspects from which we can judge him. You must remember the problems in the BLP were similarly occurring in the DLP during their time in Opposition. “Six is half dozen.”

    “You have attempted to infuse that the close election can be of credit her.”

    I never IMPLIED that, perhaps you interpreted my comments to suit your benefit. The DLP’s 2 seat majority does not give the party any room to maneuver politically, each member has to “tow the line” lest the government falls and the members lose their pension.


  22. Artaxerxes

    I really admire you…..you can take it to these ac’s like a giant! Bravo. I do not have the strength to take on these feeders of the fatted calf. Just the bare thought that they will be losing their place at the trough frightens them like no other that sends them into a frenzy!


  23. Prodigal, it’s fun for me just showing up how weak they are as supporters.


  24. Sir you seem to have an incredulous taste for flavour for the many times you have falsely accused me to be people of different names as in this case
    However to stay on subject I must once again bring your attention to the subject matter one of leadership which is not solely catergorized by how much or how many but a demonstration of the individual to take charge and control unpredicatble circumstamces or occurences
    Indeed in such area your leader has failed.Furthermore you have failed in your quest to justify those failures which i pointed in my previous comments
    You can have the last word


  25. @ This particular AC

    You praised Stuart’s leadership abilities and gave Mottley a failing grade. I, on the other hand, DID NOT seek to PROMOTE Mottley’s leadership abilities, but to PROVE that your analysis of Stuart is FLAWED, which I have done successfully.

    “Furthermore you have failed in your quest to justify those failures which i pointed in my previous comments..”

    How does anyone JUSTIFY failures? Sounds like an oxyAC (i.e. oxymoron), because only a MORON would make a comment like that.

    “However to stay on subject I must once again bring your attention to the subject matter one of leadership which is not solely catergorized by how much or how many but a demonstration of the individual to take charge and control unpredicatble circumstamces or occurences….”

    Stuart has never demonstrated he has the ability “to take charge and control unpredictable circumstances or occurrences.” The Alexandra School and NCC issues are indicative of that fact; he procrastinates too much.

    The industrial action taken by the NUPW and BWU in protest of the BIDC forcibly retiring employees, may be considered an “unpredictable circumstance or occurrence.” And how did Stuart respond? He used pejorative remarks and issued threats the leadership of both unions, which filled Barbadians with abhorrence. This is not how leadership is defined.

    Remember, anyone can “write eloquently,” but what you wrote must make sense or prove some point. Your comments were eloquently written, ONLY.


  26. Sir i suggest you leave well alone,
    Procrastination is not a poor sign of leadership, It is a diplomatic approach well best applied especially for proper governance whereby taking into account the laws and guidelines that govern a nation under its Constitutions to all of society
    Unlike Mia leadership which is well known and demonstrated through use of undiplomatic policies lending themselves to feeble street marches and yardfowl gimmicks


  27. “It is a diplomatic approach well best applied especially for proper governance whereby taking into account the laws and guidelines that govern a nation under its Constitutions to all of society…”

    By making the comment “proper governance whereby taking into account the laws and guidelines that govern a nation under its Constitutions to all of society…” you have FINALLY admitted that one cannot conduct a comparative analysis of the leadership abilities of a Prime Minister with that of an Opposition Leader.

    There are TWO MAIN aspects of the PM’s leadership, i.e. the ability to effectively lead his ministers and being capable of leading the country. The OL main objective is to oppose, as was done by ALL oppositions in Barbados.

    “Unlike Mia leadership which is well known and demonstrated through use of undiplomatic policies lending themselves to feeble street marches and yardfowl gimmicks..”

    You have once again ADMITTED that Mottley is doing what an Opposition Leader is supposed to do, that is to OPPOSE. By mentioning “the use of undiplomatic policies,” perhaps you would care to tell us what laws she has broken. There is no written rule that say an Opposition Leader has to be “diplomatic” in her/his approach, as long they oppose within the confines of the law.

    The “feeble street marches” served their purposes.

    Her “yard-fowl gimmicks” could be compared to the “information” Thompson said he had in his possession relative to the “SECRET DEAL” the BLP (while in Opposition) made with the IMF. Or Sinckler telling constituents at a constituency branch meeting that the BLP held a “SECRET MEETING” at which they discussed plans to retrench over 10,000 public sector employees. Or Stuart reassuring public sector employees that NOT ONE of them will be sent home and telling Barbadians tertiary level education WILL REMIAN FREE.

    All of the above are “yard-fowl gimmicks.” Unfortunately, these gimmicks only served to show that Thompson, Sinckler and Stuart were all LIARS.

    Now compare the Mottley’s CAHILL “yard-fowl gimmick,” which brought together Barbadians to form special interest groups to question the transparency of this project. Active research was undertaken by Barbadians, which subsequently revealed that CAHILL is a scam. BU must be congratulated for providing the forum (unlike the traditional media) where this issue could be thoroughly discussed and documents presented for our perusal.

    It is against a background such as this that you have to judge Mottley’s ability to effectively deliver her message.


  28. And I dun wid you and dat, becausen Fruendel Stuart will go down in history as the worst PM Barbados ever had.


  29. Yes i have admitted that MIA misleads and over reaches the peripheral instead of closely looking and underscore all the FACTS necessary before forming yardfowl conclusion.
    It was in the case of Clico where her emphasis was to call on govt to pay back the Clico policyholders with taxpayers money
    While not underscoring that the money needed to payback (i ) comes from taxpayers who had no interest in CLICO would only serves as a punishment to them
    SO glad you have reached the end of your rope
    BUT just a Friendly reminder
    On the battle field of life ,The winner is always the last person standing, YOU be the Judge


  30. “It was in the case of Clico where her emphasis was to call on govt to pay back the Clico policyholders with taxpayers money. While not underscoring that the money needed to payback (i ) comes from taxpayers who had no interest in CLICO would only serves as a punishment to them…”

    You know you are political yard-fowls who just writes a lot of shiitey political rhetorical generalized statements without bringing to the fore any information to substantiate your drivel.

    Your beloved David Thompson is the first one who promised to repay the CLICO policy holders. He assured the Eastern Caribbean countries that Barbados would help them as well, but maintained that Barbados must be attended to first, before attempting to assist the other countries. Perhaps Mottley was calling your party’s bluff.

    Your folly, political blindness and attempt to “be the last people standing,” may have caused you to interpret Mottley’s call for government to pay CLICO policy holders (or Thompson’s promises), to mean that “taxpayers’ money” would be used.

    If anyone in the consortium were smart and used their ability to think rationally, they would reason that CLICO is a business and obviously it would have assets, which could have been sold to satisfy policy holders’ claims.
    At that time, CLICO’s assets were reported to be valued at $441M and the Barbados government had to look for approximately $76M to settle policy holders, which could have been attained if these assets were realized.

    OF INTEREST TO YOU, (IN CASE YOU FORGOT), DID NOT THE $10M Thompson gave CLICO in 2009 “come from taxpayers who had no interest in CLICO would only serve as a punishment to them….?”

    In October 2014, Sinckler revealed that cabinet “gave the nod to a restructuring plan prepared by the company’s judicial managers Deloitte Consulting.” He further stated that “Under the plan it is envisaged that all policyholders with traditional insurance policies, such as life, health and pension plans, will receive the full value of their policies with the SUPPORT of the Government.” [Barbados Today, October 28, 2014]

    Hmmmmm, I guess that support came from the DLP’s bank account and not taxpayers.

    LIKEWISE TO YOU, just a Friendly reminder, On the battle field of life, The winner is (not only) always the last person standing, but the one skilled in the ART OF WAR…… YOU be the Judge….”


  31. Spin this all you want , DT is dead can no longer lead or mislead
    The Fact /s pertaining to Mia ability to deliver any valuable solutions have been soured and dismissed as trivia and never seen the light of day.
    Sir for the same reason that what you perceived as soluble and easy to dissolve by the wave of a finger to give relief to a complicated problem whereby govt can willy nilly seized the assets of a private company to do at will in effort to satisfy a complex problem is asinine
    Most notably Mia has now gone silent after making the outrageous solutions to the Clico policyholders and not saying a word while govt take steps to reimburse/compensate in the most appropriate and legal way the Clico policyholders .
    In this case the loudest wheel did get the grease as Mia mislead and garnish support for the Clico problem in her usual rumbustious manner but as usual for Mia it was not enough grease to stop the wheel from falling off,


  32. @ AC

    This is pure shiite you wrote, it is composed of incoherent generalized statements. You have a way of writing things that, in actuality, DO NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUES.

    Thompson being dead does NOT negate the fact that this DLP government GAVE CLICO $10M, which CAME “FROM TAXPAYERS who had no interest in CLICO (and) only served as a punishment to them.”

    I mentioned this against the background of your comment re: Mottley wanted the same government to pay CLICO policy holders from taxpayers. THIS IS THE ISSUE YOU SHOULD ADDRESS, rather than using so many “FANCY WORDS” to write shiite.

    Additionally, you have not PRESENTED any EVIDENCE to SUBSTANTIATE YOUR ACCUSATIONS relative to Mottley “making the outrageous solutions to the Clico policyholders” or that her suggestions were NOT “the most appropriate and legal way the Clico policyholders” as well.

    You have the opportunity to SILENCE ME on the issue “once and for all,” PRESENT to BU what were Mottley’s suggestions and DESCRIBE their OUTRAGEOUSNESS, this is a SIMPLE TASK.

    Unlike you, I ALWAYS PRESENT PROOF to SUBSTANTIATE what I write.

    Perhaps you should do LIKEWISE. STOP WRITING the GENERALIZED POLITICAL RHETORIC and BRING SUBSTANTIATED FACTS to PROVE what you wrote.


  33. Let’s see what Mia brings tomorrow as supporting facts or providing evidence that would determine the credibility if govt in the Cahill issue.
    I would bet that it would be her credibility the one that would be left battered bruised and stained


  34. “The Fact /s pertaining to Mia ability to deliver any valuable solutions have been soured and dismissed as trivia and never seen the light of day.”

    I must remind the consortium that Thompson dismissed Mottley’s suggestion that CLICO should be PLACED UNDER Judicial Management. Similarly to you, he probably thought she was “making outrageous solutions to the Clico policyholders.”

    Subsequently, this same DLP administration established an Oversight Committee, which also SUGGESTED that CLICO be placed under Judicial Management. As you know, Deloitte was appointed as JM.

    Hence, this action proves your comments re: “The Fact /s pertaining to Mia ability to deliver any valuable solutions have been soured and dismissed as trivia and never seen the light of day,” are not only erroneous, but pure shiite as well.

    I suggest you forget this CLICO thing, yuh.

  35. LT.HORATIO CAINE. Avatar
    LT.HORATIO CAINE.

    Dr. Agard let me make something very clear to you and the others clamoring for this decriminalizing of marijuana i will never support your call. Honestly i like you as a politician and i am one who will strongly defend you on your current situation, i am aware that you have only called for discussion, but i will draw the line on this marijuana issue it will always be the saying of a resounding NO to drugs for me.I part company with anyone who pander to this notion that the decriminalizing marijuana will be a step in the right direction, from the perspective of law enforcement the law needs to remain as it is.I will say no more.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading