Pharmaceutical Terrorism: HIV/AIDS Drugs And Profits At Any Cost

Submitted by Terence Blackett


Pharmaceutical terror began in the early half of the 20th century. “The petrochemical giants organised a coup on the medical research establishments, hospitals and universities. The Rockefellers did this by sponsoring research and donating monetary gifts to US universities and medical schools where research was drug based and further extended this policy to foreign medical establishments via their International Education Board. Those who were not drug based were refused funding and were soon dissolved in favour of the more lucrative pharmaceutical-based projects.”

“In 1939, the ‘Drug Trust’ Alliance was formed by the Rockefeller Empire in concert with I.G. Farben (an Agent of the Rothschild Dynasty). After the war, I.G. Farben was dismantled but later emerged in the many guises of the companies with whom they had signed cartel agreements.”

“These companies include: Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), Borden, Carnation, General Mills, M.W. Kellogg Co., Nestle, Pet Milk, Squibb and Sons, Bristol Meyers, Whitehall laboratories, Procter and Gamble, Roche, Hoechst and BAYER & Co. (two extant pharmaceutical companies who initially employed convicted war criminals Friedrich Jaehne and Fritz ter Meer as board chairmen). The Rockefellers Empire – in tandem with the Chase Manhattan Bank now owns over half of the USA’s pharmaceutical interests and is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world. Since the war the drug industry has steadily netted an ever increasing profit from sales of drugs to become the second largest manufacturing industry in the world next to the arms industry (also owned by the self same Elite agencies).”

“Today, health care is a multi-billion pound industry world-wide with ever increasing expenditure by taxpayers into the system which funnels the majority of this staggering profit into the hands of the drug manufacturers who are, as we have seen, headed by the major Elite manipulators of this century.”

“These companies now control the vast majority of health care and set the standards for the practice of medicine in all developed countries. Doctors are no longer free to choose the most reliable and safe forms of therapy available but are at the mercy of their financial reliance on sponsoring (frequently bribing) drug companies.”

“Once out of drug-company sponsored medical school, doctors embark on a career of increasing workloads and have ever increasing amounts of new pharmaceutical products to use and understand. The sheer volume of literature which a GP will receive from drug sales reps has resulted in the present situation whereby GPs are poorly educated about the chemicals which they are giving to their patients and are essentially gleaning most of their post-graduate training from the salesmen of private business.”

“The moral implications of this are staggering. The number of available drug preparations is now well in excess of 200,000. In 1980, the World Health organisation advised that a mere 240 drugs are necessary in order to provide good health care in the Third World (which should be more than adequate for First World needs considering we are a significantly healthier proportion of the population) whilst in 1981 the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation stated that a mere 26 of these are considered ‘indispensables’.”

“Most of the many drugs which are now available are known as ‘me-too’ drugs, i.e. recombinations and exact reproductions of drugs already available but which are irresistible to other companies who wish to share in their market.”

“For example, the standard analgesics Paracetamol and Aspirin come in a multitude of forms under a variety of different brand names and yet these products can vary in price to a factor of ten or more times for the exact same formula depending on brand type chosen. Often the consumer erroneously presumes that increased price is equivalent to increased quality in this case and is entirely unaware that the drugs they are buying and those which they are rejecting are identical. Doctors are also often guilty of prescribing drugs by trade name and thus netting greater profits for the favoured company whilst cheaper versions are available to the unwary consumer/patient. Usually, before handing in a prescription it pays to consult the attending pharmacist if there is an equivalent and cheaper drug available. This can save some chronic drug users hundreds of pounds per year.”

“Pharmaceutical companies rely upon ill health in the population to survive and reap their profits. No drug company has a vested interest in curing disease. They do, however, have a massive vested interest in maintaining ill-health, creating disease and manufacturing chemicals which will promote this under the guise of ‘therapy’ for the symptoms – rarely ever the cause – of disease. Dr John Braithwaite, now a Trade Practices Commissioner, in his expose, Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry, states: ‘International bribery and corruption, fraud in the testing of drugs, criminal negligence in the unsafe manufacturing of drugs – the pharmaceutical industry has a worse record of law-breaking than any other industry’.” (REF: educate-yourself.org)

14 thoughts on “Pharmaceutical Terrorism: HIV/AIDS Drugs And Profits At Any Cost


  1. Some laws are hard to implement, for instance
    1) My relatives from overseas are coming to the island (tourists)
    and plan to stay at my home, would I have to be registered as
    a guest house?
    2.) There are many regionalist who came to Barbados on holiday
    for two weeks (tourists) and arestill here now over a year
    and renting rooms all over Barbados, must these home owners
    register as a guest house?
    3.) What and who is a tourist?
    I understand what the witer is saying but until other matters are regulated, then this law is lawless.


  2. Western companies are well known on imposing their ventures on the others, and not left unused trick in the trick book. Those pharmaceutical companies in the US are well known on creating disease and deliberately infect it to other humans, and few days later turn up to have ARVs which is not for cure the man made disease but to prolong life and make you permanently client in their list.
    For anyone who wants know more about how powerful lobbies works on the side of the pharmaceutical companies please read the book “Fit to govern” by Ronald Roberts from page 180-242, and see how drug companies infiltrated NGOs force African Governments particularly Southern African Governments to sign contracts for drugs value billions if not trillions of dollars. I know some countries which reached the level that they could not pay for the drugs so they had to give Diamonds for the drugs.


  3. The following is a list of drugs which were passed as safe for human consumption on the back of animal
    tests and the damage which they subsequently caused:

    Eraldin (for heart disease) – Corneal damage including blindness.

    Paracetamol (painkiller) – 1,500 people had to be hospitalized in Great Britain in 1971.

    Orabilex – caused kidney damages with fatal outcome.

    MEL/29 (anti-hypertensive) – caused cataracts.

    Methaqualone (hypnotic) – caused severe psychic disturbances leading to at least 366 deaths, mainly through murder or suicide.

    Thalidomide (tranquillizer) – caused 10,000 malformed children.

    Isoproterenol (asthma) – caused 3,500 deaths in the sixties.

    Stilboestrol (prostate cancer) – caused cancer in young women.

    Trilergan (anti-allergic) – caused viral hepatitis.

    Flamamil (rheumatism) – caused loss of consciousness.

    Phenformin (diabetes) – caused 1,000 deaths annually until withdrawn.

    Atromid S (cholesterol) – caused deaths from cancer, liver, gallbladder and intestinal disease.

    Valium (tranquillizer) – addictive in moderate doses.

    Preludin & Maxiton (diet pills) – caused serious damage to the heart and the nervous system.

    Nembutal (insomnia) – caused insomnia.

    Pronap & Plaxin (tranquillizer) – killed many babies.

    Phenacetin (painkiller) – caused severe damages to kidneys and red blood corpuscles.

    Amydopyrine (painkiller) – caused blood disease.

    Marzine (nausea) – damaged children.

    Reserpine (anti-hypertensive) – increased risks of cancer of the brain, pancreas, uterus, ovaries, skin and women’s breasts.

    Methotrexate (leukemia) – caused intestinal hemorrhage, severe anemia and tumors.

    Urethane (leukaemia) – caused cancer of liver, lungs and bone marrow.

    Mitotane (leukemia) – caused kidney damage.

    Cyclophosphamide (cancer) – caused liver and lung damage.

    Isoniazid (tuberculosis) – caused liver destruction.

    Kanamycin (tuberculosis) – caused deafness and kidney destruction.

    Chloromycetin (typhoid) – caused leukemia, cardiovascular collapse and death.

    Phenolphthalein (laxative) – caused kidney damage, delirium and death.

    Clioquinol (diarrhea) – caused blindness, paralysis and death.

    DES (prevent miscarriage) – caused birth defects and cancer.

    Debendox (nausea) – caused birth defects.

    Accutane (acne) – caused deafness and kidney destruction.


  4. Impressive Terrance. We are sticking with the local Vervain, Cerassee, lemon grass and mint. Oh and some regular exercise.

    Peace


  5. @ Chris Halsall

    Well, Terrence submitted some very compelling evidence there…

    And you defend Big Pharma…why?


  6. @Avatar Gurl…

    You misunderstand me… (My fault, I was being sarcastic.)

    What I was trying to say is I don’t personally have a problem with GM organisms. I have a problem when they are used to control markets.

    And, that not all companies are evil. Some are, yes; but not all.


  7. What I was trying to say is I don’t personally have a problem with GM organisms. I have a problem when they are used to control markets.

    Well at least Mexico and some European countries seem to have enough backbone left to at least attempt some resistance to Monsanto’s heavy handed, intimidation tactics as it apparently seeks monopoly control of the world seed supply. Unfortunately its not likely the US will follow suit seeing as how Obama appointed a former Monsanto VP as the USA’s (so-called) food safety Czar.

    The man that brought you Monsanto’s genetically
    engineered bovine growth hormone is now america’s food safety czar

    Source: Huffington Post – Jeffrey Smith

    The person who may be responsible for more food-related illness and death than anyone in history has just been made the US food safety czar. This is no joke.

    Here’s the back story.

    When FDA scientists were asked to weigh in on what was to become the most radical and potentially dangerous change in our food supply — the introduction of genetically modified (GM) foods — secret documents now reveal that the experts were very concerned. Memo after memo described toxins, new diseases, nutritional deficiencies, and hard-to-detect allergens. They were adamant that the technology carried “serious health hazards,” and required careful, long-term research, including human studies, before any genetically modified organisms (GMOs) could be safely released into the food supply.

    But the biotech industry had rigged the game so that neither science nor scientists would stand in their way. They had placed their own man in charge of FDA policy and he wasn’t going to be swayed by feeble arguments related to food safety. No, he was going to do what corporations had done for decades to get past these types of pesky concerns. He was going to lie.

    Dangerous Food Safety Lies

    When the FDA was constructing their GMO policy in 1991-2, their scientists were clear that gene-sliced foods were significantly different and could lead to “different risks” than conventional foods. But official policy declared the opposite, claiming that the FDA knew nothing of significant differences, and declared GMOs substantially equivalent.

    This fiction became the rationale for allowing GM foods on the market without any required safety studies whatsoever! The determination of whether GM foods were safe to eat was placed entirely in the hands of the companies that made them — companies like Monsanto, which told us that the PCBs, DDT, and Agent Orange were safe.

    GMOs were rushed onto our plates in 1996. Over the next nine years, multiple chronic illnesses in the US nearly doubled — from 7% to 13%. Allergy-related emergency room visits doubled between 1997 and 2002 while food allergies, especially among children, skyrocketed. We also witnessed a dramatic rise in asthma, autism, obesity, diabetes, digestive disorders, and certain cancers.

    snip

    This month Michael Taylor became the senior advisor to the commissioner of the FDA. He is now America’s food safety czar. What have we done?

    The Milk Man Cometh

    While Taylor was at the FDA in the early 90’s, he also oversaw the policy regarding Monsanto’s genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH/rbST) — injected into cows to increase milk supply.

    The milk from injected cows has more pus, more antibiotics, more bovine growth hormone, and most importantly, more insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). IGF-1 is a huge risk factor for common cancers and its high levels in this drugged milk is why so many medical organizations and hospitals have taken stands against rbGH. A former Monsanto scientist told me that when three of his Monsanto colleagues evaluated rbGH safety and discovered the elevated IGF-1 levels, even they refused to drink any more milk — unless it was organic and therefore untreated.

    Government scientists from Canada evaluated the FDA’s approval of rbGH and concluded that it was a dangerous facade. The drug was banned in Canada, as well as Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. But it was approved in the US while Michael Taylor was in charge. His drugged milk might have caused a significant rise in US cancer rates. Additional published evidence also implicates rbGH in the high rate of fraternal twins in the US.

    Taylor also determined that milk from injected cows did not require any special labeling. And as a gift to his future employer Monsanto, he wrote a white paper suggesting that if companies ever had the audacity to label their products as not using rbGH, they should also include a disclaimer stating that according to the FDA, there is no difference between milk from treated and untreated cows.

    Taylor’s disclaimer was also a lie. Monsanto’s own studies and FDA scientists officially acknowledged differences in the drugged milk. No matter. Monsanto used Taylor’s white paper as the basis to successfully sue dairies that labeled their products as rbGH-free.

    http://blacklistednews.com/The-man-that-brought-you–Monsanto%27s-genetically-engineered-bovine-growth-hormone-is-now-america%27s-food-safety-czar-/4963/400/0/0/Y/M.html


  8. Oops, forgot in the above post to include this link about Mexico’s agricultural officials resisting Monsanto’s attempt to shove its GMO corn down Mexican throats:

    Mexico rejects Monsanto’s GMO corn

    (NaturalNews) Mexican officials seem to have more common sense than American officials, with their continued denouncement of Monsanto’s genetically-modified (GM) corn. Mexico has kept in effect a moratorium on Monsanto’s GM corn since 2005, citing a lack of safety studies and evidence showing the “Frankencorn” is safe, and that it will not cross-contaminate non-GM crops. The Mexican government recently denied Monsanto’s request to expand a pilot program for its crops in Northern Mexico as well.

    In 2009, Mexico decided to allow Monsanto to plant small GM corn test sites on the condition that the company could both prove that its crops were resistant to pests and pesticides, and that they could provide economic benefits to Mexico. Monsanto has yet to show that the crops actually benefit people rather than its own pocketbook, and of course the multinational biotechnology company has yet to submit a single legitimate safety study for its crops.

    The Mexican govenment seems to have had enough of the games, it seems, having recently denied any further expansions of the Monsanto test sites. With its many varieties of heritage corn, Mexico has a lot to lose if its corn stocks become contaminated with Monsanto’s patented corn varieties. So it is pressing for more safety studies before any further plantings take place.

    To date, there has never been a single, verifiable safety study proving that any GMO is safe for people or for the environment. GMO residues, however, are known to travel to nearby fields and contaminate conventional and organic crop varieties. In fact, most of North Dakota is now blanketed in GMO canola, as the mutant crop now infests fields and meadows, and grows by roadside all across the midwestern plain state.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031295_Mexico_GMO_corn.html#ixzz1DqlpWlg2

Leave a comment, join the discussion.