Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler will deliver his first budget

A recent KPMG’s Individual Income Tax and Social Security Rate Survey 2010 Report exposes a reversal in a global seven year trend of decline in top personal income tax rates. Barbados was not part of the sample group of countries used in the survey but there is enough food for though tossed-up by the survey’s findings. Of interest in the survey is a review of social security contributions when combined with individual taxes collected.

Barbados along with many countries across the globe (developed and developing)continue to battle the issue of how to effectively allocate dwindling national resources in the face of a protracted global economic slowdown. Managing an economy which is dependant on tourism, offshore sector, inflows from remittances and foreign direct investment makes the task more difficult compared to other economies which own natural resources and are export oriented.

The recent announcement by the government to present the budget on Monday (22 November 2010) will be followed by all and sundry with a heightened interest for several reasons.

In the prevailing environment where countries have been running cap in hand to the international financial agencies, Barbados has resisted, but it has come at a price. The expanding deficit as a result of government’s policy of building a social safety nets while maintaining our army of occupation in central government and statutory corporations, has been reflected in a higher deficit than desirable. To be expected credit rating agencies have not reacted well to the current state of affairs and Barbados has suffered the indignity of a downgrade in our sovereign rating. One peg above junk status.

The budget will be presented by rookie Minister of Finance Christopher Sinckler. He will have to face off against former Prime Minster Owen Arthur who is an economist by training and was at the helm of government during the boom years. For many Barbadians there is a warm feeling which comes from the memory of the BLP years in government. Sinckler’s unenviable job to present what will have to be an austere budget will challenge the most loyal DLP supporter in the prevailing economic circumstances. His political stock is sure to rise or fall after Tuesday night.

Early in 2010 the embattled former Minister of Economic Affairs David Estwick went public with the view “the economic situation in Barbados is so bad that there is need for a wage freeze and the sale of state assets to help Dr. David Estwick the government ride out the situation.” Subsequent statements by Late Prime Minister David Thompson appear to distance himself from Estwick. His subsequent transfer to the Ministry of Agriculture confirmed what was leaked into the public domain, key stakeholders in government were (are?) not singing from the same song sheet on the appropriate economic policy to implement. Sinckler was anointed by late Prime Minister David Thompson and his economic pronouncements are likely to conflict with those held by Estwick. Of interest will be to what extent Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart has exerted a contrary view on the compilation of the budget now that he has the full reins of government. Only then will the public get a sense of whether David Estwick will assume greater influence in the financial decision making of a future Stuart cabinet.

On the other side of the divide independents will be listening to Arthur carefully to discern whether he offers an economic prescription relevant to the unprecedented times at hand. Some will evaluate how Mia Mottley, Cynthia Forde and Rawle Eastmond have assimilated into the Arthur regime.  How quickly Arthur can give the appearance his team is a cohesive group two years from a constitutionally due election becomes critical if the BLP wants to be taken seriously as the government in waiting.

Will Barbadians see a government continuing to implement Thompson’s economic plan? Will we see Fruendel Stuart emerge as the Aristotle of his time? Appropriate given his penchant for the classics.  It is noteworthy Aristotle is believed to be the one who discovered logic, a desirable characteristic to possess in troubled times.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Cometh the hour, Cometh the Man.


  2. Let me say this….again. The personal income tax does not, cannot and will not cover a broad tax base and will only serve as a punitive measure vs those who already pay the chunk of taxation.

    Only a complete jackass would increase same in the midst of a recession, further dampening spending.

    The only and I repeat ad nauseum ONLY, thing that can be done is to increase the VAT rate. This may go against popular view, but the reality is that it will be done tomorrow, or in two or three years time under an IMF programme, if we stick to piddle petty increase here and there.

    That is the reality whether you or anyone else likes it or not.

    Tomorrow we see who has logi or not, we see also who has balls, or not.

    Leave personal taxation, leave corporate taxation. Increase VAT and cut select Government spending.

    Or, say hello to IMF within two years, just in time for the election.


  3. When ever there is dirty work to be done why is it that it is left to a Garrison boy to clean up …! I feel that Freundel is quite happy to put the youngster up front as one could always claim inexperience if something goes wrong … yah know, show li’l pity kinda thing… In any event Sinkler has proven to be the best of the bunch at public relations, and he will need all that skill to pull him through this one. Well well, the DLP opening the bowling with a spinner …!


  4. I hope P.M Stuart is not setting up Mr Sinckler as the fallguy for the DLP. I have the feeling that the P.M would have preferred David Estwick to be the leading spokesman for the party on economics but the late P.M appointed Sinckler, now he has to prove his worth; put your best foot forward Mr Sinckler. The outcome of this budget debate will determine the face of the new reshuffed cabinet and Dep P.M.


  5. If “Government” can only cut by 50% (half) of all the wasteful spending and the rampant “borrowing” (Bajans don’t tief, dem is borrow!) from all the various departments and corporations we will see a remarkable drop in government expenditure almost immediately! Whether anyone believes that or not, it is as true as John 3:16.


  6. A quite simple but effective budget base would be
    1.) All government ministers accept a 15% reduction in salary.
    2) All government backbenchers accept a 10% reduction in salary.
    3.) challenge the opposition to accept 10% deduction in theirs too.
    4.) Replace the amount of expensive vehicles government owns.
    5.) reduce air travel,use technology more, even when some-one
    has to travel, use business class and not first class.
    6.) Reduce the length of stay overseas, where possible and stay
    in a less expensive hotel room and not in suites.
    These are six of the ways that the average bajan would realise that the powers that be are serious about rectifying the situation Barbados is in. We would then be able to swallow the bitter pill of austerity better. The belt tightening must start at the top.


  7. Can anyone please tell me why is it that whenever a government wants more money to spend they can just legislate to grab more and more from its citizens? Is the word economise or cut and contrive not in their dictionary? It would be great if I could do the same when I want more money to spend! Just go tell my company paymaster to increase my salary as it is not getting me through the whole month. Sounds good? Well that is exactly what government is doing when they increase taxes year in year out and even sometimes in between with those “Mini Budgets” they spring on us from time to time. Isn’t it time that members of government wake up to the fact that there is really a finite, and not an infinite, amount of funds that they can expect from its people. Don’t let us forget what happened to Marie Antoinette of France after she was supposed to have told her people…. “if they don’t have bread then let them eat cake!” Now how in heavens were they going to be able to eat cake when they could not even afford bread?! How facetious!


  8. @The Scout | November 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM |
    Very well said, Sir! But when do you think such will occur, before the next snowfall in Barbados, perhaps?


  9. I believe that we are all in for a big surprise. Quite frankly , I don’t believe that the economy is as bad as we are thinking. We have done quite well thus far and once prudent and creative steps are taken , we should be alright in another year or so. Capitalist economies by their nature are mostly ungovernable. My simple philosophical position is to look after those who can least look after themselves and allow competition to take care of the rest. For example you cannot stop a man from buying a luxury car but give him the choice of being able to choose a regular one. Anybody driving and living in luxury should not complain about the price of gasoline. But when we have champange taste and mauby pockets, the obvious is just around the corner.


  10. I am hoping that Chris Sinckler will do the right, but politically difficult thing, and bring a budget designed to save Barbados from its financial peril and not one based on political expediency. This appears to be necessary based on the inputs from practically all the commentators on the various media.

    There are however a few signs that he may not do this. e.g. the timing of the budget just before Christmas; Chris himself not being in a safe seat; the need for the DLP to be thinking of an election within 2 years and therefore not being able to bring a really serious budget on voters; the fear that the BLP might regroup and be able to attract disillusioned voters if measures are harsh, etc.

    In my view, many of these factors could have been negated if a snap general election were in the offing. Unfortunately, it does not look as if that is now possible because of inertia and non-strategic thinking by the leaders.

    I really wish Chris luck but it seems the cards are truly stacked high against him being able to do the right thing for Barbados at this time.


  11. There is a feeling of deja vu regarding the position this DLP government finds itself and the need for a bitter pill to be prescribed for the sake of the country. In the back of Stuart’s mind is the distinct possibility of Arthur benefiting as he did in the 90’s.

    Interesting indeed!


  12. Don’t you political yardfowls just love the tension and suspense? Tonight you guys will be enjoying yourselves as you scrutinize, analyze, and pick that budget apart. Barring an election, this is what the political yardies live for. It’s feeding time.


  13. I am sick & tire hearing all of this talk about the Barbados economy heading for the rocks.After the elections of 2008, the Barbados economy was supposed to crumble.The same thing was supposed to happen in 2009 & 2010.We are in the final month of 2010 & our economy is still flourishing.
    Unemployment in Barbados today is at a meagre 10%,crime is not out of control and and all of our major social services are functioning & providing the services that are requite to sustain our standard of living.
    To all the economic experts out there please tell me what is so wrong with the Barbados economy that is causing us to go into panic mode.
    This government has done reasonably well in the prevailing circumstances & I have all confidence in this Democratic Labour Party administration that it will continue to manage the affairs of this country in a responsible manner and allow this country to continue to prosper.
    I am looking forward to a balance budget that will address the economic situation in Barbados and at the same time allow our social services to continue to provide services to maintain our standard of living.
    The economy of Barbados is not that dynamic & complex that some of the so-called “”economic experts”claimed it to be.We in Barbados just need a few thousand tourist to visit our shores yearly & for our financial services,sugar,non- sugar agriculture & our fledgling manufacturing industries to supplement tourism & everything will okay.
    This talk about our economy heading for the rocks is sickening.


  14. Is it not amazing that every one of the persons who are called economists have a different approach of what should be done to bring growth to the economy? That maybe the reason why economics is not an exact science. Don’t they say ceteris paribus?
    Chris Sinckler is not an economist and will therefore deliver a sensible budget after listening to advice from all quarters.
    Leave Clyde Mascoll to criticize all the other economists because he is the only economist with sense as Owen Arthur now accepts that even he can’t tell Clyde anything about economics. . He made him chief economic adviser for the BLP.


  15. Quote from “Negroman”:- “We in Barbados just need a few thousand tourist to visit our shores yearly & for our financial services,sugar,non- sugar agriculture & our fledgling manufacturing industries to supplement tourism & everything will okay.”End quote.
    *******************************************************************
    Well, well! The above quote taken from a man who hates anyone a shade lighter than himself. Like “de half make European murderers”, rat catchers/mango sellers”. Remember those descriptive words, “Mr” Negroman??


  16. de Hood
    Anyone intelligent sensible bajan who does not know or are unwilling to admit that the barbados economy is in trouble is hiding their head in the sand. The longer we fail to realise and accept this fact the further doiwn we’re going to slid, I hope Mr Sinckler and the DLP team realise this problem and takethe patriotic stance and deliver a budget that will be harse but necessary to get us back on track. Bajans will survive, during the early 90’s I saw the middle class dig up part of their lawns and planted vegies and potatoes among other crops.


  17. Bajans will have to forget the fast food joints, the dub shows, the lavish spending for cropover, christmas and old year ( new year eve), etc. budget wishly, where ever possible raise a few chickens or a sheep, goat, rabbits, things like that. I know some might say “we pass that stage” but if we want to go forward sometimes we need to go back to our roots and chart a new path.


  18. Brother Scout you seem very pessimistic these days.Tell me what is so wrong with the Barbados economy.
    Brother Scout you are falling for nonsense coming from the “economic gurus”in the island. I did A’level” Economics and received a passing grade “B” and my little knowledge of the subject matter tells me Barbados is not in any serious economic situation that demands drastic action.
    I have listen to the reports from our Governor of the Central Bank,I read some of the economic data that is available to me as a result of my line of work.In analysing that data,I have confidence in the ability of our government to bring measures that will effective handle the few problems that we are now facing.
    Brother Scout sometimes I get the feeling that you are not really a supporter of this government and sometimes you play the role of devil’s advocate. It seems to me that you do not have any confidence in this administration and is only waiting for this government to collapse so as to lambaste & criticise this administration.
    This Negroman criticise this government when I believe it deserves some lashes.However,I am a loyal supporter of the Democratic Labour Party and I will never betray the Democratic Labour Party for the obnoxious,misfits & political parasites & political duppies in the discredited & disgraful Barbados Labour Party.
    Brother Scout unfortunately after reading some of you posts,I cannot honestly state that you are a loyal supporter of the Democratic Labour Party.


  19. @ “Mr” Negroman
    One can be a supporter of any political party but one does not have to make oneself a yardFOUL!


  20. Why is it that DLP supporters can write and say anything about the BLP and its leader but as soon as one blogs an alternative view, they resort to name calling and insults?

    My friends, not everyone can support the DLP.

    Hey, at this time, Chris Sinckler seems to be struggling and has resorted as best he knows how, attack the BLP.


  21. Well folk another bank robbery (BNB Wildey) today according to BarbadosToday online, and some posters here still saying. . . . “man. nuttin eh wrong wid de economy, things good”! Right “Mr”. Negroman?? So why all these robberies this year, Sir?


  22. Negroman
    You’re right, I’m not a loyal supporter of any of the major political parties. Yes, I’m a bit bias towards the DLP but a loyal supporter no please. Yes, I was once a VERY STRONG LOYAL SUPPORTER of the DLP but I reserve my right to balance my thoughts on the progress of both parties in my quest as a patriotic barbadian. I don’t blame anyone who supports either of the two major parties but I remain nutural with a little lean towards the DLP. As I’ve pointed out before at the end I have my consience to deal with and that is what guides me.


  23. Negroman
    You may look carefully and will see that many who shout DLP DLP are not reallyloyal to the party but is just interested in what they can get; I ASK NO POLITICIAN FOR ANYTHING. I was a member of and a strong canvasser for the DLP from as early as 1976. It was immediately after the death of Errol Barrow and the problems that arose that got me somewhat dissuaded, then came the fiasco of the early 90’s, that completely turn my mind from loyally supporting them. That interest is beginning to focus again but it will take time, I’m watching carefully. Omne thing for sure I will NEVER be a member of the BLP, and I’m very cautious of renewing my membership of the DLP.


  24. Chris Sinckler is in the process of presenting a well crafted, honest budget that avoids the Yuletide effect and postpones the major pain until after april 2011. Looks like an early election is still possible.

    Will await the response and the views of the pundits.


  25. Will have to do a careful research of the budget to understand impact. Of note the increase in VAT and increase in bus fare is not unexpected. It is clear this government is hell bent on saving public sector jobs.


  26. Wonder when the budget will go up on the parliament website


  27. Austerity sucks. It’ll cost my household the following on an annual basis:

    – $5,250 removal of travel & entertainment allowance
    – $3,500 removal of the mutual fund/credit union $10k allowance
    – $1,200 (at least) due to increase in VAT on utilities, gasoline, car maintenance, vat-able groceries, entertainment

    That’s $10,000 per year.


  28. @anthony

    The budget in PDF is posted on the sidebar.


  29. @ X
    The impact on your household will be $10K at your marginal tax rate. Thus the actual impact will be $3.5K or $291 monthly assuming you are in the higher tax bracket.


  30. No dude, you’ve missed it. That $10k is after tax. I lose the following DEDUCTIONS:

    $15,000 in travel and entertainment
    $10,000 in mutual fund or credit union investments.

    That means my taxable income is $25,000 more. At a marginal tax rate of 35% that costs me $8,750.

    My estimate of the VAT cost is based on my budgeted monthly costs for the items I identified multiplied by 2.5%. i concede that this is an approximation. but I maintain that $1,200 is a reasonable estimate.

    My analysis is sound.


  31. thanks david didn’t notice it. well x you have to invest in mutual funds now to get the saving. but still good chunk of change goverment going to get in taxs.


  32. @ Anthony – no I don’t think so, the mutual fund benefit is gone with the credit union one.

    I also understand that they want to do away with the bonus conversion to mutual funds (75% of your bonus to max $7,500). So if that is included in this budget then the cost is even higher. But the answer to that bonus conversion question is not clear.


  33. The allowance for investing in mutual funds and savings with
    credit unions was useful as a means of stimulating
    investment using these two vehicles. There is no doubt that
    it has contributed to the growth of credit unions and today
    one of the largest credit unions is the owner of a mortgage
    company. The Credit Unions now control significant assets
    in the country and the larger ones such as Public Workers
    are bigger than some banks. There is therefore no need for
    an allowance to encourage persons to save with credit
    unions I therefore Mr. Speaker will remove this allowance
    with effect from income year 2011.

    that what in the document. so from that I am reading credit union one is removed mutual fund one stayed.


  34. This budget was three hours of pure hogwash, grammatical errors, blunders, stammering and populist politics.
    This is what will happen. Demand will further cripple and push us even further over the precipice. People will hold onto their coppers and further strangle the economy.
    Is this really the best that our collective brains can muster?
    Today is the saddest day in our economic history.
    Cuddear!


  35. What is clear is that the government’s commitment to protect public sector jobs by not touching in a significant way transfers and subsidies.

  36. Fair and Balance Avatar

    When is the removal and Travel & Entertainment allowance effective from?


  37. Hillary Beckles get way agenn ……….
    AAAAAAAAAAAAghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


  38. @ Anthony, that’s how I interpreted it when he delivered it. But after reading it I don’t think that’s the intention. We’ll see in the summaries tomorrow.

    @ David, I agree that increasing unemployment with Government layoffs is undesirable but there must be some cost savings and rationalisation of Government expenditures that he could have addressed. But $10k a year is a tough burden to bear and I don’t get the sense that it was a balanced approach to take. I am not a wealthy person, just a professional with a young family that did pretty well up until my taxes were increased by $10k a year.


  39. @Fair and Balance

    See what is in the budget.

    I also propose to eliminate the tax free allowances for travelling and entertainment granted to employees starting for the current income year. This measure will result in
    revenue savings of $25 million.


  40. Sorry X it seem I should have read the summary you are indeed correct. please don’t forget that excise tax has been increase on gasoline by 50% to $0.5358 which is about a 20 cent increase over today price + increase on vat ontop of that.

    Fair and Balance income year 2011


  41. Damn. That kind of action ain’t going to stimulate the economy.


  42. BU’s concern is the impact of the exercise tax on fuel. According to Clyde Mascoll it will be about 27 cents per litre increase. Can someone confirm this hike? This will have reverberating impacts on our fossil based economy.

    Additionally Mr. Speaker, The excise tax on gasoline will be increased by 50% with effect from December 1, 2010 as a revenue raising measure. The new Excise on gasoline will be $0.5358 per litre. This measure is expected to raise an additional $22.7M in a fiscal year.


  43. by by simple math if 0.5358 is future value and that 50% increase. current value should be 0.3572 which is 0.1786 increase per liter plus the addition 2.5% bring to 0.1830 a litter increase. so while not a bad a clyde said still pretty bad as i estimerated about 20 cent before


  44. Interesting to listen to Dr. Winston Moore challenging Clyde Mascoll on positions he is taking. Interesting indeed. Bear in mind they are both former Central Bankers.


  45. well there will be an increase. does the excise tax cover fuel purchased for bl&p if so we see power bills take a nice jump in December.


  46. @Inkwell

    Are you happy regarding the concessions to the PSV Sector coupled with hike in bus fare?


  47. Another observation, veteran trade unionist Bobby Morris has been persuaded to defend the government’s position. Interesting indeed.

  48. Fair and Balance Avatar

    The minister of Finance has gone the route of raising taxes to the tune of almost 200m but has chosen not to cut expenditure. So we are taxed more so that the government can continue to spend at such high levels on its social programs. This will not work and will not reduce the deficit to any significant level and has the effect of reducing economic activity. More should have been done on the expenditure side. I cannot accept that cut in expenditure only relates to wages and salaries.


  49. Fair and balance

    agreed. there is no way of getting the current account back to positive with this budget


  50. This budget is a akin to a person weighing one hundred pounds say ten years ago over that time the weigh increased to one hundred and fifty pounds and the person decides that they must lose the fifty pounds but instead of losing it gradual they go one a crash diet to lose it in a week. If the person succeeds in losing the weigh in a week chances are they will end up in ICU. Therefore for the government to impose all these measures on the backs of us at one time will put the economy in ICU as well.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending