← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Key Points of the 2026-27 Budgetary Proposals and Financial Statement as delivered by Minister of Finance Ryan Straughn on March 16, 2026.

  • This is the first Budget being presented by this Government while not in an IMF programme. Barbados has regained control of its economic future. The country is on a stronger economic footing.
  • Barbados remains in a stand-by arrangement with the IMF.
  • Debt to GDP ratio was at 99.8% at October 2025; at January 2026 now 93.3%.
  • Barbados is now off everybody’s lists – it meets international standards for transparency and financial regulation.
  • Adjustments were made to Budget to respond to current global challenges – for example, corporation tax assumptions reduced by $200 million.
  • Unemployment rate at all-time low of 6.1% at end of December 2025.
  • Central Bank expected to report next month 19th consecutive quarters of growth.
  • $728.5 million spent in fuel imported last year.
  • In past two weeks Brent crude has risen from US$64 per barrel to just under US$106.
  • Over next 3 months, hedge for Bajans with oil price locked in at US$92 per barrel – 80 000 barrels per month.
  • From April 1, Government will absorb 50% of increase in Fuel Clause Adjustment for next 3 months. It will cost Government $7.9 million.
  • Government cutting VAT and excise tax caps on fuel. From April 1, cumulative reduction of 15 cents per litre at the pump.
  • They are not permanent but to deal with the current crisis.
  • To businesses: Identify your energy wastage and fix it.
  • During COVID-19 in 2020, country imported $519m in fuel. Last year it imported $728.5m.
    • From April 1 to March 31, 2027:
  • To extend Excise and CAT holiday on electric vehicles
  • Cost of replacement batteries for electric and hybrid vehicles will be eligible for the five-year personal income tax deduction
    • Shipping bunker surcharges:
  • For 20-foot containers – from US$200 per container to US$700
  • For 40-foot containers – from US$400 per container to US$1400
  • From April 1, Customs and Excise Department to cap value of 20-foot container at US$3000 and US$6000 for 40-foot container.
  • Reverse tax credit to increase from $1300 to $1700 from April 1 for those earning up to $25000 per year.
  • Eligibility threshold to increase to $35000 and those beneficiaries will receive $750 in reverse tax credit.
  • Two dedicated Gun Courts coming – one dealing with offences committed in the last year and the other with the backlog of cases.
  • All purchases of GPS and dashcams systems for vehicles to be duty- and VAT-free on importation to Barbados for one year.
  • Customs duties and VAT to be removed for one year from importation of CCTV/security systems.
    • Goods imported for personal use through registered couriers:
  • • Tax-free amount raised from $60 to $150
  • • From $150.01 to $199.99, duty-free and only VAT payable
  • • Anything over $200 in value, Customs duty and VAT apply
  • Excludes items like alcohol, cannabis products, cigars and cigarettes
  • A $500 fine for false declarations or under-invoicing
  • Government announced the launch of the Green Industrial Gateway Advantage (GIGA) – to create thousands of new, high-value jobs.
  • This is projected to raise the country’s foreign earnings from US$700m to between US$4-6 billion annually within a decade.
    • Multi-birth cash grant:
  • • $300 per month for twins (up to age five)
  • • $600 per month for triplets and more (up to age five)
    • Barbados Republic Child Wealth Fund
  • • $5000 in trust per child born after November 30, 2021.
  • • The just-concluded Estimates have set aside $52.1m to cover current amounts. It is estimated to cost $10m-$12m per year going forward

Source: Starcom


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

73 responses to “Highlights: 2026 – 2027 Budget”

  1. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    David
    March 18, 2026 at 3:55 pm
    “@DL&PTV
    There is backup in traffic on many roads not including the ABC where the flyovers are being proposed? We have a root problem, too many vehicles on our roads; too many headed in the same direction and location at the same time.”

    The flyovers would virtually remove the intersections at the “ABC” roundabouts. Therefore should be some ease on those highways. that transect the ABC in the east- west direction. In particular I’m looking at those stretches from Green Hill through to Jackson via the Everton Weekes Roundabout, Waterford to Hothersal Turning. via the Clyde Walcott Roundabout, My Lords Hill through to Salters via the Norman Niles Roundabout, from 2 Mile Hill to Mapp Hill through the Bussa Roundabout, From Rendevous Hill to Sargeant’s Village through the Garfield sobers Roundabout.
    The effects should be cumulative down the line of the road network. Some of traffic taking the “back roads” and minors roads may have to transit these highways at some points.

    I’m not stating that flyovers are a be all and end all solution. It is what is feasible and acceptable to Bajans. I mentioned the improvement and rationalizing of public transport. As you mentioned there are too many cars on the road at one time. I observe that the congestion is very time dependent. Most commuters head to work or school between 7am – 9am. and then goes in the opposite between 4pm – 6pm. Is a possible solution looking at the hours schools and businesses in certain areas are open?
    Would govt look to restrict the importation of certain vehicles or further impose restrictive tax and duties. Is restricting the use of certain roads at some points of the day another possible solution.


  2. WHY IS THE MOTTLEY-CREW GOV* GIVING AWAY $200 MILLION TO LOCAL CORPORATIONS AND FOREIGN-OWNED – IN AND OUT OF BARBADOS? WHY IS THAT $200 MILLION NOT DIVIDED UP AMONGST THE 282,731 POPULATION (WITH THE PROVISO) THAT BUSINESS OWNERS AND THOSE EARNING WITHIN THE THRESHOLDS OF $80,000 PER YEAR OR JUST UNDER – BE REMOVED FROM THE PAYOUT?

    Good mornin’ to the sceptics, naysayers and “DENIERS” who will quickly posit that such forms of “DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM” has no place on Western oligopolies, as it leaves a bad taste in the mouths of specifics groups outside that quadrant…

    I have no fundamental argument with those folks, other than to say, “REDISTRIBUTION” is a great “LEVELLER” – just like “DEATH”, as “ALL MEN” will one day suffer the “OBVIOUS” (bar the 144,000 & those with them)!!!

    However, let us stay focus…

    Now, let’s clarify what “REDUCED BY $200 MILLION” actually means…

    LET US BEGIN

    The revenue forecast reduction, subsumes that the possibility exist that the “MOTTLEY-CREW GOV* expect to collect US$X in “CORPORATE TAX”, but due to global conditions, they’ve revised that expectation downward by US$200 million…

    This is not a “GIVEAWAY”, it’s an “ADMISSION” that revenues will be lower than assumed – regardless of policy decisions…

    The slight of hand policy-driven cut suggests that they’ve intentionally “REDUCED RATES” and/or “EXPANDED DEDUCTION”, foregoing $200 million in potential revenue to achieve some “OTHER” economic goal(s)…

    The possible combination is likely both, given the global headwinds are “REDUCING” projected corporate profits, (hence, “TAX RECEIPTS”) will be lower, and the *GOV* is adding “INCENTIVES” to try to offset the damage…

    THIS IS POOR FISCAL MANAGEMENT BECAUSE IT IS REACTIVE AND NOT PROACTIVE

    Allow me to explain

    The phrasing “CORPORATION TAX ASSUMPTIONS REDUCED BY $200 MILLION” suggests this is primarily a “REVENUE FORECAST REVISION”, not a deliberate “TAX CUT”…

    But let’s assume there is a policy element – why would they do it?

    Let us posit that this is a strategic rationale for the GOV* likely argument – then let us examine the “THINKING” behind all of it…

    Firstly, the Barbados GOV* knows that global tax competition is real, and as a result, Barbados operates in a “CUT-THROAT” international environment…

    The standard corporate tax rate is 9% , but multinational groups with revenue over US$800 million now face a 15% effective minimum tax under the “OECD PILLAR TWO” rules (Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax)…

    Small businesses pay 5.5% with special regimes exist for shipping, tourism, renewable energy, and IP income…

    If Barbados raises taxes unilaterally, corporations can and will leave the island!

    The $200 million reduction may be a defensive “CHESS MOVE” to keep the 9% rate competitive against other low-tax jurisdictions…

    Some assume corporations are “AWASH WITH CASH” but they may be wrong…

    Consider shipping costs for 20ft containers went from US$200 to US$700 (250% increase), and 40ft containers from US$400 to US$1400 based on budget summary – these costs will crush profit margins…

    Fuel costs with Brent crude from $64 to $106 in two weeks – means energy-intensive businesses are bleeding…

    The global uncertainty, with war in the Middle East, supply chain disruption, inflation, means that corporate profits are under severe pressure, not overflowing…

    The $200 million reduction may simply reflect reality but companies will earn less, so they’ll pay less tax. Therefore, the GOV* is adjusting assumptions to match impending reality…

    Job preservation, (removing corporate welfare from the equation for the time being) would suggest that a cursory look at the employment incentives in Barbados tax law, makes employment tax credit, currently running at 10% of wages for new hires, if the workforce increases by at least 10%, and maintained for [3] years – jobs credits up to 100% of eligible payroll expenditure for companies hiring [151]+ employees would mean that if the government cuts corporate tax assumptions, the trade-off is supposed to be – you keep people employed…

    IF THIS IS THE THINKING – THEN BRAVO*

    In a tourism-dependent economy with 6.1% unemployment, protecting jobs is existential (DEAR MR BLOGMASTER)!

    Investment incentives are tied to productive activity, and Barbados doesn’t and “CANNOT” just hand out money to “TOM”, “BIG DICK” & “HARRY”, just because “TAX BREAKS” are linked to specific behaviors!

    An incentive requirement “NOW” is for “RENEWABLE ENERGY” allowances, with a robust, energy audit + retrofitting + installation is badly needed – for giving away monies to companies like “EMERA IS NO LONGER IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST”!

    The focus of the GOV* must be on R&D credit (50%), with a qualifying R&D in medical “TECH”, engineering policy by forward-thinkers like Dr. Grenville Phillips, “FINTECH”
    Patent Box regime (4.5% rate), qualifying IP (software, & patents), notwithstanding, a rethink of the (Tourism Development Act); construction, renovation, & amenities – with a renewed focus on the “SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT” Act, local ownership, size limits, and most importantly, “JOB CREATION”!

    The $200 million reduction likely assumes increased uptake of these performance measures as based incentives, however, if companies don’t invest, hire, or innovate – they don’t get the breaks…

    “WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE BUDGET?”

    Tax expenditures often subsidize behaviour that would have happened anyway. If a hotel was going to renovate regardless, giving them a tax break is “FREE MONEY” – not stimulus. The $200 million assumption may include significant “DEADWEIGHT LOSS”!

    Corporate tax cuts disproportionately benefit shareholders and high-income individuals. In a society like Barbados, with significant “INEQUALITY”, this is politically and ethically problematic. The reverse tax credit increase ($1300 to $1700) is a small palliative, compared to $200 million in foregone corporate revenue…

    The #GIGA (Green Industrial Gateway Advantage) promises to raise foreign earnings from ($700M to $4-6B) annually – but if tax incentives become permanent expectations, Barbados creates a race to the bottom, where it must constantly undercut itself to retain investment – that’s not sustainable!

    Some sectors genuinely are profitable. The financial sector, for example, pays a 0.35% “ASSET LEVY” in addition to corporate tax, but the 9% rate still applies to their profits. If banks and insurance companies are highly capitalized, why are they getting the same rate as struggling small businesses? Tiered rates exist (5.5% for small business, 1% – 9% for larger companies), but the gap may not be wide enough…

    The budget says “CORPORATION TAX ASSUMPTIONS REDUCED BY $200 MILLION”, yet it does not say which sectors benefit most; which companies are claiming which incentives; what the projected ROI is in terms of jobs or investment; how many of these tax expenditures are being “WASTED” on non-additional activity, and without “TRANSPARENCY”, the public (rightly) assumes the worst – that connected corporations are getting sweetheart deals!

    Barbados is playing a game where the rules are changing mid-play. The $200 million reduction is a defensive move in a game it cannot win by playing harder. It can only win by playing differently, by building the “MOUNTAIN” Isaiah saw: a society so “JUST”, so “INNOVATIVE”, so “RESILIENT” that capital wants to be there – even without tax breaks……………………..

    Allow me to conclude this final message to the *MOTTLEY-CREW GOV* of Barbados

    Today, the GOV* is betting that $200 million in foregone revenue which will yield $4 -$6 billion in foreign earnings tomorrow (GIGA projection et al).

    That’s a massive “CASINO” bet!

    If it pays off, “CRITICS” will be silenced….

    If it doesn’t, the “GLOBAL CRACK” widens!

    Barbados’s children, already promised $5000 each, may inherit a lighter treasury than they were promised…

    The unspoken truth is that this is a gamble!

    And in a cracked world, gamblers are riskier than they look!

    HERE’S THE ANTIDOTE

    The most recent and consistent population estimate of 282,724 (from World Population Review and Statistics Times as of July 1, 2026 – pending), dividing $200 million equally among the population results in:

    $707.40bds per person

    This is calculated as: $200,000,000 ÷ 282,724 = $707.40

    Reliable, up-to-date statistics on the number of business owners and “DOMICILED” foreign residents in Barbados are not available in the public domain – however, sources mention that over 2,000 international companies are registered in Barbados…

    Approximately 17.4% of the employed population in Barbados are self-employed…

    This figure, based on International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates from 2019, includes individuals working on their own account, with partners, or as contributing family workers…

    Data from sources like Statista and Index Mundi confirm this percentage, noting it has remained relatively stable since 2012…

    A 2024 government document also reports a rise in self-employment to 18% by 2022, indicating a slight recent increase…

    Barbados has 1,172 medium-sized companies (5 to 99 employees); 187 large companies (over 100 employees) and this data comes from BoldData.nl, which reports there are 52,483 active companies in total in Barbados…

    Approximately 25% of the population in Barbados earns more than $80,000 BBD per year, and this is derived from salary distribution data, where the 75th percentile salary in Barbados is 95,720 bds per year (approximately US$47,860)…

    The top 10% of earners have an average salary of US$24,000 per year…

    The top 1% of earners have an average salary of US$72,000 per year…

    Since US$80,000 is higher than the average for the top 1% and significantly higher than the 75th percentile, it indicates that fewer than 1% of earners in Barbados make US$80,000 annually…

    Therefore, the group earning under $80,000bds (a lower threshold) is larger, placing it at roughly the top quarter of earners…

    The median salary itself is reported with some variation across sources, where some sources cite a monthly median salary of $2,790bds or $3,200bds. Others cite a yearly median salary of $35,000bds, but by definition, half of all workers earn less than the median, and half earn more. With an estimated workforce of around 130,000, this means roughly 65,000 people earn less than the median, and 65,000 earn more…

    For the “MOTTLEY-CREW GOV” to work out how many individuals and families in Barbados should be given a “SHARE” of a $200 million “HANDSHAKE” (were those monies to be given to “CORPORATES”) – it would be an easy proposition to “REDISTRIBUTE” that wealth to those who fall on the lower economic rounds of the ladder (WOULD IT NOT)?

    MY BUDGETARY ESTIMATES:

    In 2016, 15.8% of Barbados’ population lived below the international upper-middle-income poverty line of $8.30 per day (2021 PPP)..

    More recent estimates suggest the poverty rate was around 9.2% as of (2020 “PLANDEMIC” YEARS)!

    Using the current population “MODEL” of 282,731 – if we use the 15.8% figure, approximately 44,671 people would be considered in this lower-income bracket!

    If we use the 9.2% figure, approximately 26,011 people would be considered in this bracket!

    Dividing $200 million among these groups – 44,671 people would each receive approximately $4,477bds as an uplift in their financial picture!

    For 26,011 people, they would each receive approximately $7,689, respectively!

    That’s a total of 70,682 out of a population of 282,731people – 25% or a “QUARTER”…

    WHAT A DIFFERENCE THAT WOULD MAKE TO SHOPS, BUSINESSES & LOCAL ECONOMY OF BARBADOS

    #OnThatNote

    My final “REPLY” to the “Budgetary Estimates” as proposed by the “GOV” of Barbados!

    #ImDUN wid that!!!

  3. Keeping Us Together Avatar
    Keeping Us Together

    Budgets are a fools paradise (nonsense) as well as as boring AF

    There are many lamentations* on BU
    (*) passionate, vocal, or demonstrative expression of deep grief, sorrow, or regret

    Balancing the books with heavy debt pressure is a part of life when you are big

    People on BU like to chat their war stories (meaning their fake accounts of embellished truths and lies) but no one has been unfortunate to live in a war zone,
    although Pacha may have passed through some before and after hostilities

    I thought it was a good time for the peaceful anti-war rebels as people are seeing US and Israel as the bent corrupt warmongers they truly are and are feeling Schadenfreude* for their f__k ups proving how f__ked up they truly are
    (*) is the experience of pleasure, joy, or self-satisfaction that comes from learning of or witnessing the troubles, failures, or humiliation of another person.

    They are wholly guilty of war crimes on the basis of
    “Things speak for itself” (refers to the legal doctrine res ipsa loquitur),

    My advice to Pacha is to listen to the African-American spiritual
    “Down by the Riverside” (also known as “Ain’t Gonna Study War No More” and “Gonna lay down my burden”)

    My advice to David and his PTSD from reading all BU comments is to try some “Healing of the Nation”


  4. https://youtu.be/pJCFjcGTLJk?si=_hbT7MKBEPT6hdVH

    Some Asían markets have reached the 150USD per barrel, for crude, as predicated.

    Let’s see what happens when NY opens.

  5. Afraid to die whilst in the market! Avatar
    Afraid to die whilst in the market!

    NO where are you?
    How do you stand?
    Tell us 15 good Canadian stocks


  6. @DL&PTV

    What is responsible for the back up traversing Waterford Bottom to Station Hill? What about the bumper to bumper traffic along H2A? What about Lower Estate and Canewood. Too many roads which are choked unrelated to the ABC.

    You spend millions to give some relief at the intersections/roundabouts on the ABC but will it be bang for buck?


  7. @TB

    To reply to you briefly, Barbados depends on FDI and until we find other sources of revenue tourism and international business is it. Therefore the government must enable the environment to attract. It does not mean other things cannot be done. To label it as giving away money is harsh.


  8. say what?

    ““It is not by chance that in the last seven years, Prime Minister has flown the Barbados flag, and has taken her vision to the world stage,” the MP said.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2026/03/19/bradshaw-praises-mottley-effect-focus-on-people/


  9. At 11.44 am today on the US market oil was trading at $98.91 a barrel. As we buy based on the NYMEX priced market basically we can still replacing stock if bought today at $98.91 a barrel. WTI was trading between $97-$99 around that time. Brent crude was just over $111-$119 a barrel for future delivery, so they have factored in uncertainty over the next few weeks. So we are trading up roughly 4% on yesterday so far.

    I heard of all the giveaways in the budget but was wondering with a drop in corporation tax and some freeness, where will the revenue come from to close these gaps? I mean I know we the taxpayers will pay it, but what wunna got in mind to charge we to close the shortfalls? Also I smiled when I heard a minister say that ZRS will be required to have dashcams in them when on route. Question for you sir, how you going confirm they plugged in at working? Listen wunna got the cart before the horse. The problem is law adherence which ONLY the police and court system can address. Wunna want to give the fox the responsibility for protecting the chickens now? Also what wunna doing about the 40% of vehicles on the road without insurance? That too is an enforcement and adherence problem. What the dash cam going tell me, that the car in front that hit the other car both uninsured? Listen left out the fluff and address the problems that are YOURS to address not mine.


  10. @ DAVID, The Blogmaster

    I am sorry that you feel I am being “HARSH” given the circumstances we are in as a country…

    In fact, my question cuts to the heart of a vital debate that is happening right now in Barbados, with respected voices, including the parliamentary opposition I noted currently in abstentia…

    A former Senator, and even a GOV* backbencher, raising the very same concerns about accountability, transparency, and whether the benefits of FDI are truly reaching ordinary Barbadians…

    David, your critical argument reflects the government’s official position, but it must be a position that is “VIGOUROUSLY” and “ACTIVELY” contested…

    Permit me to break down why my concerns is not only valid but shared by many (EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT SAYING IT PUBLICALLY)!

    Let us begin

    This is the “OFFICIAL VIEW” as against the “EMERGING CONCERNS” folks like me have (and I am not the only one)!

    Your statement that Barbados depends on FDI and must “enable the environment to attract” it is a direct echo of the government’s strategy…

    Recent official data shows this approach has yielded macroeconomic results as espoused by those in power (and we give “JACK” his “JACKET” until proven otherwise)!

    Economic growth based on GDP grew by 4.0% in 2024 and is projected to ease to around 3.0%…

    Debt reduction which is the Debt-to-GDP ratio has fallen dramatically from nearly 140% in 2020 to about 100% in 2024, and recently to 93%…

    Low unemployment and joblessness hit a record low of 6.3% in early 2025…

    These are significant achievements!

    The government, as you suggest, is trying to build on this stability…

    Initiatives like the new “PATENT BOX” regime, which offers a reduced corporate tax rate of 4.5% (down from 9%), for companies that bring their intellectual property to manufacture in Barbados, are designed to attract a new kind of high-tech, green investment…

    The logic is that this creates high-value jobs and cements Barbados as a “GREENFIELD HUB” for the future…

    The heart of my argument centres on “GIVING AWAY MONEY” and this is where my question is most potent…

    The phrase “GIVING AWAY MONEY” directly points to concerns about the cost and accountability of these incentives…

    The recent debate over the Economic Diversification and Growth Fund Bill in late 2025 is a perfect example of why my concern is shared by others…

    The Bill’s Provision is that it authorizes the government to spend $225 million over [3] years ($75 million annually) to attract large foreign companies…

    The criticism by former Senator Tricia Watson called the bill “APPALLING”, and “POORLY DRAFTED”, and lacking in transparency…

    She argued it didn’t clearly define who qualifies, didn’t require companies to provide basic financial information, and gave a Minister the power to enter contracts without -sufficient oversight…

    She questioned whether the money was a “GRANT” or a “LOAN”, and pointed out that there was no provision to disclose who received public funds…

    The GOVs* defence was upheld by Minister Kirk Humphrey who defended the bill, stating support is tied to measurable outcomes, like creating at least “100 JOBS” for Bajans for a minimum of [7] years, and that funds could be recovered if commitments aren’t met…

    This ministerial clash shows why my “HARSH” label is simply asking – “What are we getting in return for this investment, and is it a fair deal”?

    Here are [3] reasons why my “HARSHNESS” is justified

    The “Return on Investment” (ROI) is “UNCLEAR”, as the Friends of Democracy (FOD), led by Senator Karina Goodridge (whom Dr. Phillips called the “mother of dragons”), recently pointed out that the original $75 million annual allocation to foreign companies has “yet to demonstrate clear returns on investment”…

    She questioned the wisdom of increasing this commitment without seeing results!

    This is at the core of my “GIVING AWAY MONEY” argument – it’s about “ACCOUNTABILITY”…

    Profits aren’t always shared with workers, as GOV* backbencher and union leader Toni Moore launched a blistering attack on businesses in the House of Assembly – just last week…

    She accused many in the private sector of using global crises as an “OCCASION TO WIDEN PROFIT MARGINS”…

    She argued that even when the GOV* provides relief, the cost of living stays high because businesses pass on increases out of “OPPORTUNISM”, and protect their margins, failing to lower prices when global costs fall…

    This suggests the benefits of a stable, “INVESTMENT-FRIENDLY” economy aren’t trickling down to workers…

    Structural issues remain unaddressed, where both the DLP and FOD opposition parties have pointed out that the budget lacks a comprehensive strategy for critical areas like food security and energy independence…

    The DLP argued that while there are small initiatives, there is no clear framework for significantly reducing Barbados’s heavy reliance on imports, which is a massive structural vulnerability…

    If FDI isn’t helping to solve these fundamental problems, what is it for?

    PLEASE SOMEONE, ANYONE?

    The deeper philosophical question posits that although your position is pragmatic, given that “this is the only game in town, so we must play it well” – it does not negate what my question implies, for a deeper search for a different path…

    I’m asking whether a nation must accept this model without question, or whether citizens have a right, even a duty – to scrutinize it harshly…

    The fact that these debates are happening in Parliament and the press, even without a formal opposition, shows that my “harshness” is part of a vital, democratic conversation about Barbados’s future…

    I AM 1000s OF MILES AWAY AND IF USING #BU AS THE ONLY OPPOSITION IN TOWN – THEN I SHALL DO ACCORDING TO WORKS OF THE ANCESTORS

    Respected economists like former Central Bank Governor Dr. Delisle Worrell (WHO IS FAMILY & DIED IN THIS MONTH OF MARCH 2017), even argued for a paradigm shift, suggesting that to boost GDP, the Caribbean must focus on its “CAPACITY TO IMPORT” by making its export sectors so competitive that the large global markets can absorb everything they produce. This is a different vision, but it still centres on the need for strategic, productive investment…

    David, I am not being “HARSH”. I am being a vigilant citizen, although (M.I.A) #MissingInAction…

    You are correct about the current economic reality – FDI is crucial, however, your question challenges whether that reality is the only one possible and, more importantly, whether the current deals being struck are fair, transparent, and ultimately beneficial to the people of Barbados…

    The “CRACK” I’ve identified in the global order is also visible here also, in the tension between macroeconomic success and the lived reality of citizens who wonder where the benefits are going…

    My question is an essential part of ensuring that the path forward for Barbados is not just stable – “BUT JUST”…

    “RIGHTEOUSNESS EXALTS A NATION” is what I live by…


  11. @TB

    A people gets the government they deserve. We voted for this government 30-0 three consecutive times now, where are all the people centered and civic minded individuals?

    The quality of this government mirrors who we are and what we want.


  12. @ David

    Don’t get too worried about oil prices in the medium term. Yes it will go up a bit short term but we are one of the best places to be in order to be protected from absorbident prices.

    As soon as the Trinidad and Cuban refineries can get back up and running at full speed, we will be able to take Venezuelan crude there. There are also refineries in the USA that are already taking Venezualn crude, as they were built to handle that grade of heavy crude. Shipping is also a big part of prices, so if we can get fuel from Trinidad down the road that started around the corner as crude in Venezuela, the Caribbean would become one of the best places to be fuel wise. Before Trinidad and Cuba come back on line we can actually get refined Venezuela crude out the USA.

    Its not all doom an gloom in the medium term, we are in the right location with a wash of crude in Guyana and Venezuela for refining. The government in the short term has put things in place to protect us by placing a cap on the input costing for fuel. In the short term there will be some price peaks, but I feel we will be OK in the long to medium term.

    Just been reported that 1 large oil tanker got through the straits without issues earlier today. You also have to realise that the straits are a 2 sided sword. Iran can’t export or import anything if the straits are closed. The future of Kharg Island is also a concern for Iran. Its going to be interesting over the next few weeks for sure.


  13. @David The Blogmaster

    With all due respect, permission to come aboard on your very audacious, but poignant question of “FACT” – but may I reserve comment until another day, as the “PREP DAY” looms & I have much on my plate & eating with a knife & fork calls for a modicum of skill & etiquette – especially within the British context!!!

    Have a blessed evening, UNTIL*…


  14. John A

    You know very little about the petroleum market.

    First, it does not behave as though purely driven by market forces.

    Second, supplies are not based solely on levels of production. Indeed, many times sanctions were applied to dampen supply thereby increasing price. OPEC, as a cartel, fixes prices to some extent.

    Many other variable, on both sides.

    Thirdly, financial manipulation has been use to lower prices. Buying puts on the current price.

    Fourthly, Venezuela’s production shall not significantly increase until over 100 billions are invested into the renovation of aging installations. Drumpf brought the oil majors to the WH after the kidnapping to be told exactly this. That the Venezuelan oil industry is not investable. That they will only go in if the US government put up the over 100B in capital. That it will take 10 years to achieve this.

    BTW, one NY index listed curde at about 120USD today, earlier. Though not 150, as I suggested, a bit just under a 30 percent rise, day to day.


  15. @Pacha

    I know enough to show that it never went near $150 a barrel in none of the markets we buy from.

    I am not getting in to a tic for tac discussion with you either, because I noticed once anyone challenges anything you say, you knowing more than anyone God put on earth, flies into defensive mode and proceeds to call them ignorant or worst, as only your opinion matters and only you know everything and having been blessed by this divine gift, based on that the opinions of others would have to be wrong.

    For those who want a touch of reality at 4.40 pm today oil was trading at $94.53 on the NYMEX, with a peak being reached today of $100.48 cents and a low of $92.10. What it was trading at in Timbuktoo or Bora Bora is of little interest to me as we don’t buy from dem!

    Anyhow you go and talk to Bushie let he put some God in yuh cause I done wid dat! LOL


  16. Venezuela currently produces NOW roughly 800,000 barrels of oil a day, with a goal of reaching 1,200,000 a day by year end. Barbados uses roughly 11,000 barrels of oil a day. Now with the USA controlling Venezuela oil sales you know nuff of their old clients off the list. I know Mia did tell Trump to ” tek back she visa”, but I sure he would sell us the little drizzle of oil we need daily. If push come to shove all we got to do is beg Kamla to put in a good word for we with Trump and we gone clear. Plus even if you don’t include Venezuela, as of NOW Guyana who just get in this oil thing the other day, currently producing 900,000 barrels a day with plans to produce 1.7 million barrels a day in three years time. Surely dem too would sell we the little drizzle we need as well, after all we is caricom brothers and sisters coexisting in the zone of peace as one.

    If wunna doubt me cause I don’t profess to know everything, go to The Exxon Mobil Guyana website and they will tell you all bout the Stabroek co-ventures and all who involved in this harvesting of Guyana’s black gold.


  17. Well, weee were quoting Brent. The Brent price reached as high as over 119 p/b. We’re talking about the international markets not large oil and gas producers. You’re talking about America alone but there are other large producers whose prices are a pittance compared to what Americans pay.

    Again the economy for oil and gas on American markets are subject to other factors.

    America is one of the largest producers and are therefore not as exposed to external factors, shocks, as non oil and gas countries. The non oil and gas countries, to this writer’s mind, are better barometers of the impact of the military strikes yesterday than oil and gas producing countries.

    In Iran, gasoline is still about 3 cents per liter. On the other side of the spectrum. Trump himself has lifted sanctions on Russia and plans for lifting them on Iran to stop price escalation abroad for fear it will reach Americans too.

    We’ve had increases as high as 150 p/b in Asia last night and today gas was up as much as 35 percent in Europe. These international differentials will only vary with the American markets in the short run.

    Well, me too! Humans know less than one percent about what is knowable. However, because of what this writer does, oil & gas markets are not two of them.

    You may have the last word, since it was you who engaged this writer in the first place. Gallop on!

  18. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    David
    March 19, 2026 at 9:52 am
    “DL&PTV

    What is responsible for the back up traversing Waterford Bottom to Station Hill? What about the bumper to bumper traffic along H2A? What about Lower Estate and Canewood. Too many roads which are choked unrelated to the ABC.
    You spend millions to give some relief at the intersections/roundabouts on the ABC but will it be bang for buck”

    For sure Highway 2A should be made 2 lanes in both directions for as much of that highway as is possible. It is now at over capacity during peak periods. I call that stretch from the Ronald Mapp onto the Barrow and Adams Highway as the “bypass highway”. At the rate the traffic is increasing we will need a bypass for that bypass. I know some traffic from St Philip will take the road from Boarded Hall into the Glebe, Charles Rowe Bridge into the same Lower Estate to Canewood stretch. That is now a de-facto bypass road.

    I remember on Brass tacks a few years ago a caller made a comment that from Hothersal Turning to Station Hill a dedicated right turn lane should be made just outside Combermere School. Traffic heading down Bank Hall would make the right turn there to ease the back up. As is, one lane is used for traffic going straight or to turn right. Could a solution be to make that stretch from Clyde Walcott into that point a two lane road?


  19. To all those who doubt that our great nation is a liberal democracy:

    Read
    https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf
    page 45.

    In terms of colours, we’ve been a liberal democracy since around 2015. So, just before our Supreme Leader seized power. Apparently, the less opposition we have, the more liberal we become. I think that’s a good sign!

    Tron
    fair and balanced


  20. Current world governments attempting to artificially impose a worldwide energy transition away from hydrocarbons to renewable energy alternatives, principally wind and solar, could find eventualy they are in effect just “tilting at windmills.”

    “Renewable” energy policies can’t work – because of physics

    The current “renewable” energy policy is in a head-on collision with physics. The physics of gradient, density and land use are the starting point for understanding why, writes Richard Lyon.

    Chapter 1: The Physics That Demolishes Energy Policy, Or Why You Can’t Boil An Egg In A Swimming Pool
    By Richard Lyon, 3 March 2026

    On Saturday, I told you I’d written a book and promised to walk through its core arguments chapter by chapter. Some long-standing readers will recognise what follows from a post I wrote in 2024. This is the sharper, tighter version that became the book’s opening chapter – the foundation everything else rests on. If you’re new here, start here.

    There is far more heat energy in a swimming pool than in a pan of boiling water. You can boil an egg in the pan. You can’t boil an egg in the pool. And if you doubled the size of the pool, you’d double the energy available – and still have a cold, raw egg.

    This is not a riddle. It is the single most important concept in the energy debate, and almost nobody making energy policy understands it.

    SNIP

    Density
    Energy gradient tells you whether a source can do work, and therefore why the sheer quantity of energy available tells you almost nothing about how much useful work you can extract from it. Energy density tells you whether you can build a civilisation on it.

    Diesel contains roughly 44 megajoules per kilogram. The best lithium-ion battery manages about 1. That is a ratio of 44 to 1 – and the gap is not an engineering problem. It is a chemistry problem. Carbon-hydrogen bonds release enormous energy when broken. Shuttling lithium ions between electrodes releases much less. The periodic table is not subject to software updates.

    This is why you can drive from London to Edinburgh on 50 litres of diesel, but need a battery weighing half a tonne to do it in an electric car. It’s why aviation runs on kerosene and always will. It is not a matter of waiting for better technology. It is a hard physical constraint.

    Every successful energy transition in history has moved up the density ladder: wood to coal, coal to oil, oil to nuclear. Each step concentrated more energy into less mass, enabling capabilities that were physically impossible before. Railways. Aviation. The globalised supply chain. The direction has always been the same: concentration.

    Land
    There is a third concept that follows from these two: power density. How much energy can you extract from a given area of land?

    A gas-fired or nuclear power station produces roughly 1,000 watts per square metre of land it occupies. A solar farm manages 20 to 30. A wind farm – once you account for the spacing turbines need to avoid stealing each other’s wind – delivers 1 to 3.

    That is a factor of somewhere between 300 and 1,000. To replace a single gas plant with wind turbines, you need 300 to 1,000 times more land. That land is not empty. It is farmland, moorland, coastal seabed or someone’s horizon. It must be manufactured, transported, erected on concrete foundations, connected by access roads and linked to the grid by hundreds of miles of new transmission lines.

    This is not a problem that improves with scale. It gets worse. Low power density means spreading out. Spreading out means longer transmission distances, more infrastructure and more energy consumed building and maintaining the collection network. At some point, the energy required to sustain the system begins to consume a significant fraction of the energy it produces.

    The system is running to stand still.

    More: https://expose-news.com/2026/03/19/renewable-energy-policies-cant-work-because-of-physics/?utm_campaign=T-ANP&utm_medium=email&utm_source=es


  21. Green Monkey…
    Richard Lyon is wrong.

    You CAN boil an egg in a swimming pool.
    Except that no one would do so, …because of the massive wastage of energy that would be used to bring the unnecessarily large volume of water to boil…
    Unless of course the objective was to boil 10,000 eggs.
    Also…
    It in nonsense to compare the energy density of diesel – that represents a ONE-TIME, inefficient, polluting transaction, with a lithium battery that will have a life of 30,000 cycles, and do so at impressive efficiency and pollution free – until recycling is warranted.


  22. Reckless government spends $31M more than the budgeted $4M. The giveaways in the budget were given to quell outcry. How was the additional $31M spent and who got pocket money. Mia Mottley has always been a big spender and why would Bajans expect anything different with money that is not hers. Where is Ryan Walters who was given a Senate pick by Mottley appointed BLP President Bostic.


  23. So George…
    If you had a willing donkey, you wouldn’t ride it?

    What is $31M?
    The jockeys spent $60m in HOPEless housing – with NOTHING to show…
    They wasted another $50m in steal houses that rusting away…
    They just allocated $1/4 Billion to splurge on unknown potential ‘investors’..

    …And they SUBSEQUENTLY received 100% jackass endorsement by vote…

    You thought that the jockeys would stop riding now – and walk wid we…???
    Steupsss
    The brutes don’t even bother to budget any more… just SPEND and SPEND
    800% CARIFESTA OVERbudget ??!!!
    LOL
    ha ha ha

    Steupsss!
    Ryan Walters shiite!
    He soon get a ministry…

    Brass bowl jack asses were MADE to be ridden … and ridden hard.

    What a place

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading