Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

George Pilgrim, General Secretary, Democratic Labour Party

The dream of every Barbadian is to own a piece of the rock.  Your home for most persons represents your single largest investment and your major asset.  The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has always recognized and been guided by the philosophy that when you create a society of home owners you have created a solid foundation for economic empowerment and wealth creation.  The National Housing Corporation (NHC) was established on April 1st 1973 by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP).  The DLP has always viewed the NHC’s responsibility as one of providing access to housing for Barbadians from all walks of life and helping Barbadians fulfill their dream of “owning a piece of the rock” and having an asset they can use as security for a business and something they can pass on to their children.

The DLP’s commitment to housing was clear from the outset and during the DLP administration of 1962 and 1976, 3,539 housing solutions of one, two and three bedrooms were provided. Of these housing solutions, 2,714 were constructed for low and middle income earners. We developed Eden Lodge, Friendship Terrace, Wildey Terrace, Lodge Terrace and Wanstead.  This commitment has continued and in 1989 alone, the then DLP administration provided 186 masonry houses, 30 timber, 12 terrace units, while 196 masonry were under construction. In addition, 118 housing solutions were completed under joint venture arrangements. As you will see later, the 1989 output alone was greater than the 594 housing solutions provided by the NHC over the fourteen years of the Owen Arthur led, BLP administration.

The records of the NHC indicate that in early 2008, soon after the current DLP administration assumed office, there were approximately 28,042 persons on the  NHC’s waiting list. The NHC data further indicates that between 2003 and 2008 there was a 250% increase in the number of persons on the waiting list. This surge in the waiting list occurred despite a decade long construction boom, four high profile Ministers of Housing, a much publicized Primary Homes Program, a Settlement 2000 Program, a joint venture program launched in 2003, the aim of which was to provide 860 houses to primarily middle income earners. Of this only 147 were completed. As a matter of fact, Deans Town was launched in 2004 and not a single house was constructed. The Owen Arthur led BLP administration’s lousy record on housing continued with the Hardwood Housing fiasco and the  vesting of 134 parcels of land spread over 30 constituencies ranging in size from 177.5 square meters to 111 828 square metres, but no houses being completed.

Of these 594 houses completed under the Arthur administration, 123 were constructed for relocation purposes and 181 were under construction when the BLP came to office.  Even it we are generous and include the houses under construction, the Arthur administration’s record works out to 42 houses per year, and 10.5 houses per minister. Of course, Minister’s Farley‘s contribution was to sign a 99 year lease, 11 days before  the last election, with Sapphire. Stay tuned,  Minister Lashley  will give full disclosure on this matter so that the Opposition leader Mia Mottley will have all the facts on the 99 year leases signed by the NHC during their tenure.

In two years, in the midst of the worst economic recession since 1933, and with limited financial resources available to the NHC, Minister Michael Lashley (on the job full time) has completed 515 housing solutions.  Terrace units at (Country Park Towers[56], Tweeside[20], Sayes Court[4] and Clapham[16]).  Houses at (Work Hall [44], March Field [31], Four Hill [42], Greens [51] , French Village[17] and Constant[64]) and Coverley [170] with 300 promised by year end. The NHC has already put out tenders for small contractors to build 122 houses in Parish Land St. Philip and 89 houses in Lancaster 1 and 2. Other solutions are at various stages of development and the nation will be made aware of these over the coming months.  The fact is that to date, Minister Lashley’s completion rate is 8 times the rate of his predecessors. In other words for every one housing solution provided by the four BLP ministers, the current Minister is delivering approximately eight.

What can explain this dramatic difference in performance, between the DLP administration and the BLP administration?  Why can Bajans now reclaim the dream of owning a piece of rock? Why can Bajans now dream, not just of being workers, but homeowners as well? The reasons are clear, while one party was focused on simply building an economy; the Democratic Labour Party is focused on building a society. We have placed people at the centre of our development agenda, a concept that upsets the Opposition.

During the period of the last BLP administration, ordinary Bajans were priced out of the housing market. Some persons had to resort to renting rooms (instead of a house), living at home, while others had to pay through their teeth for their homes. There are several reasons for this:

There was a dramatic increase in land prices over the 1994 to 2007 period.  Mr. Owen Arthur is on record as stating that’s land must fetch its highest economic value, Bajans are now paying the price for this philosophy. Dame Billie Miller even felt that Barbadians were schizophrenic in their concerns when responding to concerns raised about land prices.

The exclusive focus of the Arthur administration on building condos, villas, and homes for the wealthy and the economic benefits from such, led to a surge in building costs to as high as between $400 to $600 per square foot on the west coast.

The exclusive focus of the Arthur administration on building condos, villas, and homes for the wealthy and the economic benefits from such, saw the construction sector almost completely ignoring the lower to middle income group.  During the Arthur years there was simply no product being produced for lower and middle income persons in Barbados.  This is the first time in years that we are seeing major housing projects aimed at the ordinary Barbadian and we do not apologize for it.

The DLP supports and welcomes foreign investment in our construction sector. However, the government is prepared to intervene aggressively in the housing market to ensure that while we get the economic benefits of the foreign investments, Barbadians can afford decent housing.

The DLP has conceived and is assiduously implementing a comprehensive range of housing solutions for Bajans.  The solutions are not just aimed at the lower income group and the working poor created under the Arthur administration, but the new, landless and houseless middle class in Barbados.  The solutions range from VAT relief for houses valued up to $400,000, $5/500  lots of land, rental units , starter homes , lower and middle income housing projects, a  rent to own program, among other creative solutions.

The DLP is not interested in talking housing solutions. It is interested in finding housing solutions for Barbadians. This has led to creative public Private partnerships in the housing market. It is our intention to continue to work with interested partners to bring a mix of affordable housing options to Barbadians. There will be no compromising on quality and comfort. While the Barbados Labour Party seeks to create scandal, the Democratic Labour Party continues to build and create a home owner society.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 responses to “The Dream Of Every Barbadian Is To Own A Piece Of The Rock”

  1. Opposition is at sea Avatar
    Opposition is at sea

    David, can you believe that The Nation refused to carry this article today, pretty sad when you have the likes of Sir Fred Gollop former President of a BLP Senate in a position that determines what is and what is not to make it for the public to read.


  2. Nothing will save the DLP
    This is kite flying
    Next Election already decided
    Thanks but No Thanks !
    DLP ——-DOOMED

    ONE TERM !
    ONE TERM !
    ONE TERM !


  3. While the DLP must be applauded for their effort to produce housing solutions, it must be pointed out that enough study wasn’t carried out on some of these project. There is a shortage of potable water in many parts of Ch.Ch and St. Philip, yet we’re building houses in at least 4 areas in these two parishes without upgrading the water supply. Plus, when all these houses are built, do we have enough persons who really qualfy to own these houses? Are we just going to put people in them and then have problems with the mortgage payments. Thirdly to build these houses it calls for a large amount of foreign exchange to purchase building material from overseas, then the houses are sold to locals, in a depressed economy like it is right now, are we not depleting our foriegn exchange that is needed to feed the nation. I,m not even talking about the distribution of the houses among construction companies/contractors.


  4. Opposition at sea
    You are the government now, not the opposition.
    My advice is to you is that you must improve the party PR program. You are making the fundamental mistake of depending on the Nation newspaper to get your message out. You are failing by not having your websites active. Give some of the good young persons in your party the jobs of keeping your website up to date. Have a face book account; use the blogs the internet is the way to go. Do you know how many mature persons use the internet?
    Check today’s Nation where Owen Arthur is on the back page with this foolish story of Dr. Estwick not being told he was being moved. The PM does not have the time for no arguments with Dr.Estwick. Did he tell the managers from the hospital he was firing them?
    David Thompson really was on the ball of not giving Dr.Estwick the Ministry of Finance and Economic because this morning story from Arthur would be how David Thompson promoted Dr.Estwick for his bad behavior in parliament. Remember Arthur said that Davis Thompson should show strong leadership and fire Dr.Estwick for that incident.


  5. Is there a good basis to question why the Nation is asking for Arthur’s opinion on this matter?


  6. Whereas the provision of housing solutions for some Barbadians seems to be one of the very few areas in which this ram goat DLP Government has been performing just modestly since its election in 2008, the fact of the matter still remains that this ossie moore DLP Government is blatantly refusing to deal with the fundamental problems that are forcing it to provide these types of housing solutions.

    And, whereas many commenters and visitors on BU will see the above type of self-congratulatory, pat-yourself-on-the-back-one-sided sheepish article bleating out this kind of ordinary, unspectacular performance ( no doubt the creator of this article is a DLP member), the fact of the matter is that this same self-serving piece of wishy washy has failed to highlight the fact that this DLP Government continues merely to deal far more with the symptoms of a wider, deeper massive housing problem that faces the broad masses and middle class of people of this country – than with the causes of a wider deeper massive housing problem in Barbados, which is itself part of a more immense labyrinth of social problems found in the country.

    So, in this DLP Government’s quest to seek some more cheap publicity and political gains and mileage over its ability to JUST ORDINARILY provide housing solutions – most of which are really substandard incapacious dwelling units and spaces – or over its ability to do so in conjunction with private people, it does so shamelessly against the backdrop of at least two things:

    1) ITS GROSS AND RECKLESS FAILURE TO PROVIDE A NECESSARY PROPER REGIME OF INCENTIVES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO BE AFFORDED BY MANY MORE BARBADIANS AND OTHERS IN THE COURSE OF THEIR SEEKING TO – AT THE LEAST COST – BUILD OR ACCESS THEIR OWN WELL CONSTRUCTED AND FURNISHED HOMES IN BARBADOS, so that in the final analysis many of these same Barbadians and others would not continue to be seen by some others to be so mendicant powerless in begging government to give them housing in this an increasingy dependent welfarish society.

    2) Its gross prodigious failure, and that of Mr. Michael Lashley’s, to deal with the fundamental question of the political relations and structures that govern the type of distribution of land, wealth and income in this country. For, it is these post colonial state/elite driven political relations and structures that are helping to produce, in 2010 today, many thousands of Barbadians and others who remain in a state of abject abysmal homelessness and landlessness, and who live in dire wretched poverty and in utter human degradation.

    Moreover, what this joke DLP Government and the writer of the above – as well as the members of the last demonic BLP Government – which, too, did ABSOLUTELY nothing to correct the above 2 stated problems – must
    RECOGNIZE is that more and more very productive Barbadians and others in this country are NOT PREPARED INDEFINITELY to see situations whereby places like Millenium Heights, Fort George Heights, Port St. Charles, St. Peter’s Bay, Apes Hill Development, etc., continue to come into existence, and that are developed for some of the very monied, very exploitative very socially depraved around – some of them locals and foreigners – and those developers and their affliated corporations like William Enterprises, C O Williams, JADA Construction, PRECONCO, etc., using almost ever available means to create develop such places; and THEY DO NOTHING ANY THING ABOUT THEM, as life reaches greater hellish proportions for them and many of their families and others, as they continue to grovel and eke out a living in their own country not having enough income, resources and assets to help them through their existence in this country.

    So, finally, what the writer of the above essentially mis-directed junk must surely realize is that sooner or later many very productive Barbadians and others will not continue to tolerate living in Landing Schemes, and continue to be viciously marginalized and dispossessed, whereas these two failed traditional factions – DLP and BLP – continue to play mind games and lie with statistics and half truths, over many otherwise depressing situations in this country, and whereas those who really live off their backs – the backs of the broad masses and middle classes – continue to live comfortably in luxury in the best circumstances in this country.

    Joke!!!

    PDC


  7. PDC
    Are you suggesting, that those who live in the landing schemes should storm those in the gated communities and take over their properties? Thre is nothing wrong with living in a landing scheme, it is the character of the person that counts

  8. simply anonymous Avatar
    simply anonymous

    my gosh, i would have been embarrassed to post that report. since the DLP has been accusing the BLP of not helping bajans to get houses, what r they doing? what about Coverley? how many houses have they really given to people since they came into office? i heard too that some people have returned their keys (coverley) to the NHC, why? it is pointless to try to show us what was happening in the past, when we are concerned with what is going on now. i know if Thompson’s dies now, the DLP is done for
    ,

  9. Fair and Balance Avatar
    Fair and Balance

    Maybe you should exam the level of mortgages with the banks during the BLP 14 years and see how it increase from 1994 – 2007. We all dont have to depend on the NHC for housing solutions. i think that is the fundemental difference between the two parties. The D look to give handouts and the B help people to help themselves by providing the right enviorment


  10. The issues of land prices and the willingness of construction companies to cater to middle and low income housing have little to do with the policies of the DLP or ingenuity. It is the economy stupid!!!!
    Any one familiar with the private housing market knows that construction companies seldom to never focus on low or lower middle income earners. To attract these players to this segment of the population a combination of command and control, or market based mechanisms must be employed. One such policy by the last government, if my memory serves me correctly, was requiring applicants applying for planning permission to build houses to also provide lower income housing as a condition of approval. This government was only able to get Jada and that ilk to participate in this segment of the market because the sector has declined rapidly over the past three years. According to the Central Bank the declines have been 10% and 19% in 2008 and 09, and a further 13% as of June 2010. The construction companies are therefore ‘playing their part’ out of necessity not civility. Furthermore, if government is willing to allow a company to monopolise its house building projects at a time of a depressed property market it is obvious that companies would get involved—a case in point Coverley.
    To argue that the Arthur Administration only focused on building for the rich is also disingenuous. Firstly, the former government NEVER built any housing for the rich; and secondly if they focused solely on the rich why is it that your government is now able to COMPLETE (not conceptualise or design) the very projects you grandstand about i.e. Tweedside Rd, Country Park, Fordes Rd, Fench Village, Coverley etc. By the way, when will the projects begin at Tudor Bridge and at Haggatt Hall; and also how many people have qualified and or have moved into these ‘completed’ houses. Where is the promised $5 per sq ft programme? Has it been stymied by the fact that a subsidiary of CLICO owns a massive part of the land earmarked?
    I recall the pre-election hue and cry about change of use and a promise to implement fancy sounding legislation to keep land in agriculture. To date not a word on this policy! I hope the government has realised the folly of such a policy, and recognised that the best approach to the issue of land use planning is to adopt a negotiatory rather than a regulatory framework where discretion is an option. The fact is that the change of use of land from agriculture to housing has always been, and will continue to be, a major feature of our land market. Were many of the heights and terraces, the recently acquired land at Brighton (ask Dr. Frances Chandler) and that at Bulkley not previously classified as agriculture? Change of use is necessary to control market prices; it is a case of supply versus demand (whether real or perceived and that is why the issue of the non-development of approved subdivisions is integral to the debate as recently posited by the Chief Town Planner) . Therefore, stifling change of use (while continuing with low density housing solutions) will result in even higher land prices. This is one of the many reasons why the Coverley project is ill-conceived; and if the government were so concerned about land market prices, as alluded to, instead of building those slave ship-esque houses they would have focused on a ‘Millennium Heights’ type development at Coverley. Gloating about the poorly conceived project at Coverley proves that government is more interested in its political party than the people. Government could learn a lot from the much maligned ‘west coast developers’.


  11. The fact that the DLP cannot acheive anything at all emphasises the crap about-
    MAXIMUM LEADER
    TIME TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM !

    I KEEP IT REAL
    simple !

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading