The British media unlike that in Barbados recently reported on the legal troubles the British company Mabey & Johnson is currently enduring. The BU family should remember that Janathan Danos was a former executive at Mabey & Johnson who subsequently left to form the company 3S Barbados to facilitate the ABC Highway Project (search BU for the many blogs posted on the murky project). Although Mabey & Johnson failed to win the road widening ABC Highway job, Danos was lucky to setup a five man company months before the previous government issued a multi-million contract to 3S Barbados using a rolling MOU which continues to be a hotly debated matter.
What is it the British media has printed about Danos’ former employer?
On July 2009 the Times Online reported that Mabey & Johnson a leading UK bridge-building company appeared in court today to say it will plead guilty to charges of overseas corruption and breaching United Nations sanctions. Mabey is charged with offences relating to activities in Jamaica and Ghana between 1993 and 2001.
On September 24 2009 the Times Online reported that Mabey & Johnson is to be sentenced on bribery charges. Although no Mabey & Johnson employees will be charged, it is the first time a British company has been prosecuted for either offence and there are no official sentencing guidelines. Based on similar cases, Raj Chada, a partner at law firm Hodge Jones & Allen, said Mabey & Johnson was facing a fine “in the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions.
On September 26 2009 the Times Online reported that the British Serious Fraud Office by pursuing the judgment against Mabey & Johnson is a major coup for the Serious Fraud Office — and for the principle that large companies operating abroad can be held accountable under British law. Mabey & Johnson has been fined 6.6 million pounds.The report highlighted the culture of giving kickbacks at Mabey & Johnson.
What does all the above mean? What is the significance to Barbadians?
Jonathan Danos was a former executive with Mabey & Johnson who left to setup a company 3S. The question which BU continues to ask, why was the contract awarded to 3S a company with no track record of road building? Why despite accusations and legal troubles in Jamaica for Danos he was able to establish 3S Barbados to win a government contract? Barbadians need answers.
The current government came to office promising to expose this mess to the public, two years later we are still waiting.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.