← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Yardbroom

Binyamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel
Binyamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel

A United Nation inquiry has made the claim that Israel engaged in:

…a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorise a civilian population in Gaza.

It further asserted that some individuals should face:

individual criminal responsibility and both Hamas and the Israeli committed war crimes and possible crimes against humanity

Although the inquiry subjected Hamas to censure it was not as severe as that on Israel. The conflict Dec 2008 – Jan 2009 – debated on BU ( Barbados Underground)  – was as a result of tunnels built by Hamas to circumvent the Israeli blockade being bombed by Israel.  Hamas intensified their belligerence and fired rockets into Southern Israel in retaliation, causing panic in the civilian population.  In the resultant war when the Israeli Military crossed into Gaza, in excess of 1,300 Palestinians were killed including 320 children, official figures gave the Israeli death toll as 20.

Due to the high number of Palestinians who lost their lives and the disproportionate force used by Israel with consequent civilian damage in Gaza, pressure was put on the UN to conduct an inquiry. The UN chose the  experienced and respected South African Judge Richard Goldstein, he came with a background  suited to the task.  “He was the Chief Prosecutor for the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for the Yugoslavia and Rwanda from 15 August 1994 to September 1996. He was a member of the International Panel of the Commission of Enquiry into the Activities of Nazism in Argentina ( CEANA ) established in 1997 to identify Nazi war criminals who had emigrated to Argentina.”

The UN inquiry has called for an independent investigation, if this is not done the matter should be referred to the International Criminal Court.

Israel has been robust in their defence of the military action taken in Gaza.  Saying their accusers are against Israel, this is not surprising as the allegations against Israel are serious indeed: the inquiry noted  “Grave breaches” of the fourth Geneva Convention and of a war crime for using Palestinians as human shields.”

It is difficult to understand the reasoning behind Israel’s claim that the accusers are against Israel.  Richard Goldstein – chairman of the UN inquiry – is Jewish and a very experienced Judge, with close ties to Israel.

Mark Regev the Israeli government spokesman has said:…”the Israeli Government is conducting its own investigation into the conflict”.  However, Judge Goldstein responded that ” the Israeli investigations are being conducted behind closed doors and as such are not to an “acceptable standard”.

Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu condemned the report as a “kangaroo court”, a charge which does not carry much credence because the Israeli Government refused to participate in the UN investigations…thus having no  input.

Judge Richard Goldstein’s daughter with less hyperbolic language is reported to have said:

“My father is a Zionist who loves Israel.”

“I know better than anyone else that he thought however hard it was to accept it, he was doing the best thing for everyone, including Israel,…”He is honest, tells things how he sees them and wants to uncover the truth.”


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

530 responses to “UN Inquiry Accuses Israel Of War Crimes In Gaza”


  1. Gawd Halsall, you just love to take on “unarmed” combatants.


  2. @Anonymous… LOL…

    I understand and apprecaite what you are saying…

    To be truly honest, I much prefer better armed opponents….


  3. Chris,
    I’m not asking you to believe anything
    but you should challenge the official
    verdict and make your own conclusion.
    Attacking a physics teacher’s opinions
    to be inferior to your own esteemed self professed wisdom is more of an
    indication of your own self importance
    and ignorance, methinks.


  4. Like for example the wt7 building
    was not hit by a plane.
    How did that collapse mister ?


  5. and don’t ask me to provide sources for you to say it’s not credible


  6. Kiki you should do a search of BU using 911 as a keyword.


  7. @kiki: “but you should challenge the official verdict and make your own conclusion.

    Correct me if I am wrong here kiki, but *you* asked *me* directly if I thought explosives were involved in the 9/11 WTC attack.

    I answered that I didn’t think so, and I gave my reasoning.

    Also, please note that my conclusions (derived from my simple knowledge of physics) *agreed* with the “official verdict”.

    The fact they didn’t agree with what you wanted me to agree with is not my problem…

    @kiki: “Attacking a physics teacher’s opinions to be inferior to your own esteemed self professed wisdom is more of an indication of your own self importance and ignorance, methinks.

    Really? Then (IMHO), you don’t actually understand how the Sciences work.


  8. Chris
    now review the 5000 comments on bbc
    regarding the same subject matter
    as long as you can say you thought about
    it and feel no bombs were used it must
    be kosher.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/10/caught_up_in_a_conspiracy_theo.html?page=11#comments


  9. @kiki: “…and don’t ask me to provide sources for you to say it’s not credible

    Are you not comfortable that the sources you have cut-and-pasted from (importantly, without referencing same) can stand up to peer review?

    If not, why have you cut-and-pasted them (and thus put your “name” behind what they said)?


  10. Chris you seem to be cherry picking what you want to respond to. How can a building world trade centre 7 blow up without a plane hotting it


  11. @kiki: “…now review the 5000 comments on bbc regarding the same subject matter

    Comments on a Blog mean nothing. It is a bit like asking “who do you think will win next year’s Cricket match”.

    I’m interested in knowing what *Scientists*, *Engineers* and *Researchers* think, and are willing to put their professional reputations behind…

    Again, I ask: please cite your sources you’ve quoted above.


  12. come on answer how can it collapse like
    that


  13. @kiki: “How can a building world trade centre 7 blow up without a plane hotting[sic] it

    WTC building 7 didn’t blow up, kiki. However, your choice of language is interesting…

    Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center


  14. and stop being so anal

    ‘name your source, name your source’
    +
    ‘ I’m interested in knowing what *Scientists*, *Engineers* and *Researchers* think’ la-di-da



  15. @Chris

    You are aware this matter has bee extensively covered by many of the BU family already.


  16. @kiki: “Chris you seem to be cherry picking what you want to respond to.

    I don’t agree. I will go further, in fact, and argue that you are the one being disingenuous here.

    I’ve just once again answered your direct question.

    Care to answer mine?

    Let me please repeat it for the third or forth time: “Please cite your sources you’ve quoted above.


  17. @David…

    Yeah, I know…

    But the issue of citing sources is important (IMHO).


  18. Chris,
    There are a number of different sources
    in the public domain.
    However, FYI, credible documents have been nobbled by the feds. So your ‘name you source’ could be a trick question

    http://www.plectic.com/nineoneone/collateral.htm
    http://www.plectic.com/nineoneone/collateral2.htm
    http://www.arsenalofhypocrisy.com/911/9-11_Truth.htm

    BTW. I have an open mind not a closed one on this subject, and just think information should be passed on for others to make up their own minds
    impartially and also non-politically.


  19. IMHO Chris’ conclusions don’t mean shit
    I need a drink now…
    http://555dubstreet.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/tichen/


  20. Chris, your first mistake was “engaging” kiki…..waste of time.


  21. Chris & BU
    There are a number of different sources
    in the public domain.
    However, FYI, credible documents have been nobbled by the feds. So your ‘name you source’ could be a trick question

    [Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]
    [Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]
    [Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]

    BTW. I have an open mind not a closed one on this subject, and just think information should be passed on for others to make up their own minds impartially and also non-politically.

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    IMHO Chris’ conclusions don’t mean shit (because he has not convinced me either way)

    I need a drink now…
    http://555dubstreet.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/tichen/

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.


  22. Is it just me or is it accurate to say, that every time Western or just say USA politicians are angling to exit from Iraq and Afghanistan, the ‘leaders’ of Al Quaida issue more inflammatory statements, to wit, keeping the ‘fire’ going?

    Big debate in US on Afghanistan, obviously people are fed up and want out.

    Playing devil’s advocate, sensible thing for any opposition to Western influence would be to keep the hell quiet and let them leave, then focus on slow indoctrination of the citizens. Surely?

    But, no! Zawahiri issues an inflammatory statement, clearly intended to keep the fires on and conflict continuing in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

    Why? Admittedly they are not his countries, so why should he care, but surely anyone would want their seen ‘enemy’ to leave?

    So, why does he want them to stay???

    Who benefits?

    It is becoming more and more clear who does and who the real beneficiaries of Al Quaida are.

    It surely is not the common Arab citizen.

    It surely is not the Muslim world.

    But, the Arms Dealers surely enjoy much profits from this ongoing, never-ending conflict.

    This has gone from the obvious to the ridiculous.

    Remove the blindfolds.

    Who IS Zawahiri working for? Why his interest in keeping the confict at its highest level?

    Think about it.


  23. So Jah Seh
    Rasta don’t work for no CIA
    Jah sent us here to show the way
    Ratsa don’t work for no politician
    True Ratsa mad is a good and upright man
    So he will live. yes he will for evermore
    Through Jah mercy he’ll endure
    So Jah Seh according to your work you will be paid
    So try to live in an upright way
    Tell the people what Jah Seh yeah

    http://555dubstreet.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/so-jah-seh-2/

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading