Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by DNV

Høvik, Norway, 7 October 2026 – Energy-importing countries are scaling clean energy three times faster than exporters, as governments seek to reduce reliance on imported oil and gas by expanding domestically produced power, according to the tenth edition of DNV’s Energy Transition Outlook.


The disruption to energy supply through the Strait of Hormuz is reinforcing governments’ determination to reduce dependence on imported oil and gas. At the same time, exporting countries outside the Middle East are increasing production to compensate for disrupted supplies, whilst their own decarbonization journeys are increasingly slower compared to the rest of the world.


As a result, the share of non-fossil energy in the primary energy mix of importing regions increased by 2.2 percentage points over the past five years, compared with just 0.7 percentage points in exporting regions. This means China, India and Europe have collectively shifted towards non-fossil energy more than three times as fast as the Middle East, North America and Russia.

Bar chart showing world seaborne trade by segment for the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050, and 2060, illustrating a decline in fossil fuel shipping and growth in other cargo categories.


Prolonged conflict would permanently reduce fossil-fuel demand


The disruption to the Strait of Hormuz has strengthened incentives for importing countries to diversify supply and reduce their exposure to oil and gas, increasing the long-term risks facing fossil-fuel exporters. DNV’s new forecast sees the Middle East supplying around 40% of global oil production in 2050, compared with 50% in last year’s outlook.


An additional DNV sensitivity analysis examines the impact of the Middle East conflict continuing until 2030, with oil and gas prices remaining moderately elevated during that period. Under this scenario, global oil and gas demand would be 4–6% lower while the conflict persists. Demand would remain 2–5% below DNV’s main forecast for the remainder of the forecast period, indicating permanent demand destruction as consumers and governments accelerate the shift to alternative energy sources.


“Energy security is redrawing the map of the energy transition,” said Ditlev Engel, CEO – Energy Systems at DNV. “Importing regions are accelerating electrification, renewables and storage to reduce their exposure to the most insecure fossil-fuel markets. Exporters, meanwhile, are responding to today’s shortages by increasing investments and production. The result is a widening divide in the speed and direction of the transition.


While the geopolitical landscape is becoming more complex, there should be no doubt that the energy transition is happening, and that it is already large in scale. However, we must continue to embrace and accelerate it, as everyone is starting to recognize that energy is now part of our critical infrastructure and must be prioritized accordingly”

Technology gap emerging


The gap is widening between competitive mature technologies and emerging technologies reliant on increasingly constrained policy support. Falling costs are accelerating the deployment of solar power, onshore wind and batteries, whilst more expensive emerging technologies are losing ground. Solar PV and onshore wind are increasingly displacing fossil fuels from power generation, and installed battery capacity has increased 14-fold over the past five years.

Bar graph illustrating the projected decline in shipping of fossil fuels compared to other cargo segments from 2025 to 2060, including liquid gas, fossil oil products, crude oil, coal, iron ore, grain, containers, and minor bulk.

 
However, technologies essential to decarbonizing the hard-to-electrify sectors are not being prioritized due to their high cost and concerns about industrial competitiveness. Compared to last year’s outlook, the amount of hydrogen and carbon capture and storage in DNV’s long-term forecast are down 29% and 15% respectively. While both technologies are still expected to grow rapidly from a low base, stronger policy support will be needed to bridge the cost gap and accelerate deployment.


Nuclear power is the notable exception among higher-cost technologies. DNV forecasts that nuclear will maintain its current share of global power generation as electrification accelerates. Installed nuclear capacity is expected to grow by 30% over the next decade and by 170% by 2060, despite high costs and supply-chain risks.


“Driven by solar, wind and increasingly battery storage, electricity is emerging as the clear winner of the energy transition,” said Sverre Alvik, Director of Energy Transition Research at DNV. “The pace of electrification over the next two decades will be more than twice that of the past two decades. Although importing countries are leading the shift, fossil-fuel exporters are also embracing electrification because it delivers greater efficiency and lower costs.”


AI is adding a significant new source of electricity demand. DNV forecasts that global data-centre electricity consumption will almost triple from around 400 TWh in 2025 to 1,100 TWh in 2030, with AI overtaking conventional data-centre workloads in 2031. However, data centres, including AI, will still contribute less to global electricity-demand growth to 2040 than either electric-vehicle charging or space cooling. Growth will be concentrated initially in North America, where data centres will absorb around one-third of the increase in power generation to 2030, while in China the power demand growth from data centres is less of a concern.


Current transition pathway leads to 2.3°C of warming


Despite accelerating electrification and renewable-energy deployment, the ambitions of the Paris Agreement are out of reach. DNV forecasts that energy-related emissions will fall by 44% by the middle of the century, putting the world on course for 2.3°C of warming. Net-zero emissions are not expected until the 2090s, and even that timeline is uncertain because it relies on technologies such as direct air capture, which have yet to be deployed at scale.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 responses to “Energy-importing countries scaling clean energy three times faster than exporters”


  1. Emera and Canadian Utilities to merge into $72-billion powerhouse.

    https://financialpost.com/commodities/energy/emera-canadian-utilities-72-billion-merger-equals


  2. Certainly, this issue is not as straight forward as presented though the present circumstances are well representative.

    For we’ve had the largest producer of petrleum in the world, the USA, doubling on that energy source as the way of protecting the instrument much more important than energy – the petro-dollar.

    In addition, there has been a near general abandonment of climate change targets by Europe and the United States.

    Prior to the recent wars in West Asia and Ukraine, both started by the West, the Europeans were closing nuclear and coal plants as fast as they could, though of recent there have been some reversals.

    Why, because it will always be a mistake to presume that solar, wind, thermal, wave, and other forms seen as alternatives, especially in temperate zones, could ever totally replace all of the others – coal, nuclear – and some see this as clean – or another alternatives.

    But yes! The exportation, manufacture, of electric vehicles has definitely shot up over the last three to four years of war and this trend may also be seen with solar installations.


  3. The west started the current Ukraine war. By Dr.Seuss.


  4. Well, when was the Ukraine war started, Dr. Bernays?


  5. It will take five (5) years before oil and gas production return to pre-January 2026 levels even if the wars in West Asia stopped today.


  6. Fossil fuel bill soars

    BARBADOS COULD BE on course to spend $135 million more on imported fuel this year, a possible income which Minister of Energy, Business Development, and Commerce Kerrie Symmonds believes reinforces the need to transition to renewable energy.

    However, Symmonds said yesterday that in doing so Barbados, like other Caribbean countries, still had to overcome a number of hurdles related to battery storage and other technologies, skill shortages, and concerns about financing risks linked to clean energy investments.

    He was speaking during a panel on A Leadership Dialogue On The Future Of Regional Investment on the final day of the Caribbean Investment Forum at Hilton Barbados Resort.

    War in Iran and the related closure of the Strait of Hormuz have triggered increased oil prices, at times in excess of US$100 per barrel since March.

    Symmonds said there would be “a tremendous amount of strain on the national budget as long as we remain wedded to the importation of fossil fuels”.

    “Just to give you an example, within the first seven months of this year, we have spent $80 million . . . more dollars than we spent on the importation of fossil fuels during the last year,” he told the session moderated by Caribbean Export Development Agency executive director Dr Damie Sinanan.

    “So, if you do the arithmetic, you will see that . . . we are going at the rate of $11 million more per month than we otherwise would have done.

    “And if you reflect on it, that really takes us to a position where we are at one half of one per cent of GDP and if that position is to hold for the next five months, we would have spent about $135 million dollars more than we would have spent last year on the importation of fossil fuels.”

    The minister indicated that this all added up to “a significant strain on the national budget as long as we remain reliant on the importation of fossil fuels”.

    “So to divorce ourselves from that is the real ambition. The question is then, how do we do it? And there has to be a difference between just the ambition and the ability to deliver,” he stated, while pointing to efforts to shift to renewable energy.

    Symmonds said the first step in this regard was the establishment of an integrated resource and resiliency plan (IRRP), which was now renewed every two years “because new technologies are rapidly coming on stream, and we want to make sure that private capital is able to find opportunities as they arise and as rapidly as possible”.

    “And in that IRRP, we have identified a number of energy contributors to what would be the national energy mix. So we have photovoltaics, we have wind onshore and potentially offshore, we have biomass, we have hydrogen, and that constitutes the very credible mix that that we have right now,” he said.

    “Then the next thing really is the role that government must play in order to transform that ambition into a lived reality. And . . . so we begin with having a legislative framework which is critical, and that legislative framework will will now see essential pieces or parts of the the paradigm being able to be implemented.

    “For example, battery storage was never something in our legislation before. It is there now. The ability to have other technologies being brought on board is is is also there,” Symmonds stated.

    He said one of the challenges in Barbados was not having a readily available of people with the required skills, including “lawyers who have a specialty in regulatory aspects of law, the energy economists, the data analysts, [and] the cyber security specialists”.
    (SC)

    Source: Nation


  7. It has the feel from a distance that Barbados is not pursuing an aggressive enough energy strategy given the current state of play.


  8. What strategy what!!??!

    It has the feel that the energy policy drivers can’t drive…

    LOL @ the unlicensed ‘driver’ who drove the photo voltaic plan into a ditch …is now back behind the wheel, and now driving a ‘battery storage’ PSV…

    Brilliant strategy dat!!!


  9. What is really wrong is the political mind of people like Kerrie Symmonds, the useless economic models they are tied to and the ongoing reliance on the fiction of an over dependence on alternative energy solutions.

    We’ve long known that GDP means nothing. For by GDP measurements Barbados could be the largest economy in the world tomorrow morning if this writer hired Kerry Symmonds as a lawyer agreeing to pay him 30 trillion dollars and he reciprocally hiring this writer as a consultant also paying 30 trillion dollars. Resulting immediately in a 60 trillion dollar Barbados economy by GDP standards, all other things being equal, and not a cent actually changing hands.

    Alternatively we have Iran, a country with a GDP of one percent of that of the USA which has defeated the Americans twice in a year.

    How can these be?

    There’s also an economic metric which says that high energy use is the best indicator of development. Iranians can fill their gas tanks for less than five USD and they are one of the highest per capita energy users in the world.

    Of course, we can cite other metrics as well. Iran is one of the leaders in the world in knowledge production, has been for years, a highly independent country by most other measures.

    So when Bessent threatens to destroy their economy, that kind of talk makes sense to idiots like Kerrie Symmonds but all Bessent will achieve is the backlash which will destroy the American financial system, as is happening currently.

    Nothing these people have, were and will tell us could be true, will never work for countries like Barbados which regard Western logics as holy writ?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading