Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Hartley Henry - DLP Political Strategist
Hartley Henry – DLP Political Strategist

When fowl cocks are fighting, millipedes should get out of their way. That is why I am not going near the coliseum where the epic duel for leadership of the Barbados Labour Party is taking place. Forgive me, but there are some things that can only be expressed using the Bajan vernacular. The late Richard Allsopp would have understood what I mean when I say that in this battle for party supremacy, there appears to be an exchange of the sexes.

Reeling under the weight of the skullduggery of others, Mia ups on Saturday and constructively dismisses her entire shadow Cabinet, replacing them with members of her “Come Near to Me Chorale”. She knows several of the elected and particularly non-elected members she appointed in February of last year are no longer in her corner so she effectively fires the whole lot and replaces them with her second string team of “just comes”, who nobody knows or is particularly impressed with. It boggles the mind how persons, the likes of Toppin, Payne, Eastmond, Forde, Clarke and Duguid can remain silent on this.

The rush to have the “just comes” endorsed as candidates was to facilitate this particular move. The hope is that when a vote for leader of the team going into battle against the Democratic Labour Party is taken, she would receive majority support among the candidates. Mia is a learned attorney and she has her own interpretation of the party’s constitution, so I will not attempt to argue with her, even though I think she is making a cardinal error.

She is trivializing the issue of candidate selection. That process ought not to be used as a weapon against one’s enemies. She is saddling the party with some candidates that simply cannot be taken seriously in this day and age. No track records in anything but bravado. It is incomprehensible for senior members of the party to be meeting candidates for the first time on the night of their endorsement. Little wonder the question was asked ‘how can I sing the lord’s song in a strange land?’

Yet this rough and tough, masculine approach to leadership is being pursued. We are also hearing of sponsorship of an updated Cole publication entitled ‘Boys in the Band’, that is about to be circulated across the land. There is no place in Barbados for that type of politics, and invariably, it always backfires on the authors and their sponsors. I predict it will so do in this particular case.
Owen, on the other hand, has chosen to take his campaign to the party’s base. He is pandering to their emotions by dangling the hope of an early return to office, so that those who sat at the table of opportunity for the past 14 years can resume their dominance. This is a classic Roman duel.

The entire drama is being played out in their favorite publication. One does her thing on Saturday for Sunday, and the other, his thing on Sunday for Monday. The economy, they both agree, is the issue of national concern and focus. Yet, in 2009, with all the economic fire power at its disposal, the party can only muster a third-string team of unknowns to articulate its economic policies and perspectives.
Three years ago the party boasted Arthur, Mascoll, Wood, Barker and a host of others “on the hill”, as economic gurus. Today, as a result of internecine strife and warfare, they offer Lynch, Gooding-Edghill and Weir. Can you believe that? These three are now the titans of economic thought and discourse in the Barbados Labour Party.

But, before the ink had dried on that declaration and the appointment of other “unknowns” to key portfolios, Arthur shot back saying he had returned to ‘save the party’. Hear Ye, Hear Ye! Draw near! The Messiah has arrived! Of the close to 310 000 souls in this country, there is only one man and one man alone capable of saving Barbados and the Barbados Labour Party from eternal shame and destruction. He has the magic formula. The Midas touch! Barbados and the Barbados Labour Party cannot survive without Owen Arthur at the helm. He and he alone can save this land. What crass arrogance! Is this what power does to you?

Arthur abandoned the ships of state and party in their most perilous hour of the past 70 years and now wants the fatted calf killed to herald his return from exile. What is he coming back to do? Reverse the policy of free bus fares for school children? Insist that small businesses pay National Insurance in tough economic times? Fight with Patrick Manning in Trinidad over fish? Bring back 3S to build three flyovers at a cost of $90 million? Award contracts similar to that granted the same 3S? Flood Barbados with more migrants than it can comfortably accommodate? Further polarize and politicize the public service? Bring a halt to the construction of hundreds of homes for deserving Barbadians? Cancel summer camps for school children? Sell large chunks of land to foreigners for the building of unsightly monstrosities? Channel all government procurement in the direction of one individual? Ignore the issue of accommodations and conditions of work for public officers? Reverse millions of dollars in subsidies and concessions granted farmers? Make it impossible for small hotels to access the tourism development fund, thereby keeping their doors open in difficult economic times? What exactly is Owen Arthur coming back to do?

Other leaders have had their day and have slipped into the political sunset. Sir Henry Forde, Sir Richard Haynes, Sir Lloyd Erskine Sandiford are all classic examples of eminent statesmen who ran their course and finished their race with dignity and aplomb. None of them was ever seen or thought to be keen on loitering around the parliament of Barbados. They all had lives before politics and they have all pursued and lived meaningful and quality lives since leaving politics.

More recently, Dame Billie Miller, Sir Louis Tull, Sir Richard Cheltenham, Philip Greaves, Maurice King, Warwick Franklin, Cyril Walker and others have all hung up their boots and given way to newer generations. Politics did not define them. They were each “somebody” before entering politics and they each have a positive mirror image of themselves now that they have left the arena.

This is the first time in recent memory that a failing and fading politician finds it so difficult to resettle in civilian life. It is as if he had plans of remaining there until death. Owen Arthur, having served his party and country with distinction in his formative years as leader, has now become a sad, sorry spectacle on the political landscape of Barbados.

We are about to witness an epic case of political-murder-suicide. The fowl cocks are in the coliseum. The battle is about to begin. No blood shall spill on me. This millipede shall watch from the safety of the stand.

(Hartley Henry is a Regional Political strategist. He can be reached at hartleyhenry@gmail.com)


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

29 responses to “No Place For Millipede At Fowl Cock Fight”


  1. Yet another good article from HH. Yet again I am afraid he is not thinking things through to all possible conclusions. He is not using the information at hand to help him understand these events and situation to their fullest.

    HH gave us a long list of negatives that would be near impossible for anyone to overcome. But is it absolutely impossible, to so do?

    I think HH should take that very long list of negatives against Arthur and ask himself, How come can this man still achieved such a high rating amongst barbadian electors as the recent poll showed?

    If Arthur is so washed up how comes he was invited by Thompson to discuss the economy?

    I maintain that the DLP will have a much bigger fight with Owen at the helm than with Mia. Maybe the DLP’s strategy should include frequent reminders to Barbadians of Arthur’s shortcomings as HH outlined. It would seem that the public has already forgotten and may have decided to look to the economist former PM as Thompson sought to do, in these difficult economic times.


  2. It would seem that the public has already forgotten and may have decided to look to the economist former PM as Thompson sought to do, in these difficult economic times.
    ……
    I have not forgotten what Owen did for this Country Barbados: he saved us from certain economic destruction in 1994 and I , like most people believe that he is the most equipped individual to do so now. Thompson also seems to believe like me and that is why he attempted , pretended or try to invite Owen to a tea party (breakfast).

    The people of BARBADOS have made up their minds as to who they will vote for in the next election. The DLP is worried and uncomfortable because things in Barbados have not gotten better. This is the most crucial point to be made . What are waiting for ? Bring baxk Owen.

    I can see the slogans now:

    “THINGS GO BETTER WITH THE BLP

    “THINGS GO WORSE WITH THE DLP
    -“VOTE BLP

    UP AND ON WITH THE BLP

    DOWN AND OUT WITH THE DLP
    -VOTE BLP


  3. Adrian Hinds
    Owen Arthur came into power and found the Barbados economy on a growth path. He took it higher, but got carried away, being in power too long. Most Barbadians did not agree with his immigration policy and I do not think they are going back there. It was not about economics.
    I am not a pollster but I am sure that the DLP got the edge because of the perceived corruption and the illegal Guyanese situation.


  4. X OUT THE DEES
    X IN THE BEES

    ..>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    DEES———DUMB
    BEES———BRIGHT
    -VOTE BEES


  5. MASH UP THE ECONOMY WITH THE DLP

    RESCUSE THE ECONOMY WITH THE BLP

    VOTE BEES


  6. MORE EMPLOYMENT WITH THE BLP

    MORE LAYOFFS WITH THE DLP

    -VOTE BEES-


  7. COST OF LIVING UP
    COST OF LIVING UP
    COST OF LIVING UP
    —WITH THE DEES–

    ONE TERM
    ONE TERM
    ONE TERM
    —FOR THE DEES


  8. KISSMYA
    Are you saying that the economists in the Ministry of Finance and Central Bank are not giving David Thompson the same good advice to make the economy grow as they did for Owen?
    How can one man save a country?
    It is all of the trained brilliant Barbadian minds that will take us out of this mess.
    Barbados is a good democratic country and the next election is constitutionally due in 2013.Therefore all hands on deck to keep Barbados as a wonderful place to live. It is not about Owen now.
    Clyde Mascoll is a good economist. He should leave the BLP and become independent of politics because he has no future in that party. He can then put his knowledge to work for the people of Barbados by starting some advisory foundation where his contributions would be more accepted.


  9. Toss the lot of them out, BLP this DLP that, its a smokescreen. They have been doing the same cycle of growth and contractions since 1966. To hear you people speak of these parties as one being superior to another, strikes me of a case of mild amnesia or some form of political psychosis. The main issue you DLP/BLP Luddites conveniently over-look is the fact that none of these so called leaders have ever taken responsibility for things that have gone sour. I would have used a private sector company as an example (firing the useless) but in this place the useless are related to the ones in-charge, it would take nothing short of red-handed theft or murder to get them gone. The political system is flawed, the people in office are scarily clueless and this horrible cycle will only continue until there is nothing left,

    or

    this BLP vs DLP charade is finally erased. So you “corned-beef and biscuit” eating party loyalists either get a clue or just find something else to do on voting day.


  10. HH ‘It boggles the mind how persons, the likes of Toppin, Payne, Eastmond, Forde, Clarke and Duguid can remain silent on this’

    ??? Toppin and Payne scarcely said a word for ten years, Eastmond blew up like a volcano once, of the above only Duguid can have credibility, for talking and willingness to engage the public.

    As for Mia’s strategy, she is right. The candidate slate must be clean for the next election. But, she needs to look at the quality that she brings. The young Bradshaw girl is a bright young lawyer. Weir is a businessman, who can bring pragmatism. But a couple of others have uncertain depth.

    Mia must however seek to have Owen on her side, the two of them together will be formidable and present a serious 2013 (or 2012????) challenge.

    The clever thing for Thompson to do would be to spring an early election on the Opposition, in early 2012, before they have too much time to regroup and become established, in the public eye.

    The clever thing for the BLP is to regroup fast and furious and become established as viable, in the public eye.

    Owen must be part of this, even if only to resign a few months after the election and accept the GG post.


  11. The Nickster

    Come into the real world and come out of the matrix

    So what will you do given your perspective.

    Please give some pointers


  12. Fair play –you know the answer to your questions.

    You have technocrats who give advice and you have politicians who think about winning the next election.—


  13. @TheNickster

    completely agree with you.

    Politics in this country has whittled down to Pay the Piper first, Hook one’s self up next, People & Country last.

    Good governance and accountability are just electioneering buzz words.


  14. David
    It seems BU is becoming the official blog for the two leading parties. Quite honest, i have no intention of discussing politics between diehards from either party, at the end of the day it is the floating voters that determine the next government.


  15. @The Scout

    Look at the positive side, the BU family has the opportunity to speak directly to the people behind both parties. Sock them the messages you want them to know loud and clear.


  16. Hartley, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all the time.

    1) Your political strategy will not work here. You are saying all sorts of things because you are afraid if Owen comes back. Remember that Comptom came back in St Lucia and beat the Kenny Anthony Administration and you were the political strategist and the head honcho for the Kenny Anthony SLP Campaign.

    2) Your arrogance about you being the real Prime Minister of Barbados will be your demise.

    3) Please leave David Thompson alone and stop milking him for the $15,000 dollar a month salary that you are getting. I will not vote for the DLP again unless opportunists and mercenaries like you are no longer influencing and having my leader on a string like a puppet.


  17. With due respect, I think that voters now accept that a strong Opposition is the best scenario for the country.

    As such, I would caution the writer, to be careful on attacking the Opposition, lest it be seen as an attempt to destroy any Opposition.

    Further, while vibrant and pro-active politics should usually be considered good practice, should the Government and its advisors not be seen to be focusing on management of the country, midway into the term, rather than electioneering?

    i.e. action must be seen to be done.

    Remember a former leader’s words on perceptions?

    I think the last few moves have been mis-guided, not only in content, but as a political advisor (so we understand, correct if we are wrong), the writer’s duties are to be in the background, assisting in direction, but ensuring that the Ministers get the spotlight.

    But then, I am but a simple voter, what do I know?

    Peace

  18. mash up & buy back Avatar
    mash up & buy back

    David

    The BLP leaders and the DLP have been reading the blogs so they know what we are saying.

    We don’t need any partisan posting every other day to take away from the enjoyment we get from reading these blogs.


  19. @mash up

    Think where we differ in the argument is we miss an opportunity to suggest change when we don’t dialogue with the other side. It seems we live in a world today where we are inclined to harden positions at the early stage. If the BU family considers its views to be neutral what is wrong with testing your positions against the enemy?


  20. Does David Thompson really allow this guy to speak on behalf of the DLP?

    What a thing.

    He’s such a liability.
    I dont understand why he was given credit for the last election. There’s no political party in Barbados that will get more than three terms. So Hartley Henry had nothing to do with the outcome.
    Look at the voting patterns in the island since adult suffrage and one will see that.
    This guy is plain dumb and continues to do a serious disservice to his party. He needs to be silent and work in the background.
    It’s solely because of him that I will never vote DLP again and I’m not alone.


  21. Has anyone seen NN’s article in today’s DLP edition of the Advocate! What aload of rubbish. Why did he not check his facts first before writing the article?


  22. HH should replace NN in above.


  23. Anonymous
    I made the same point, the voting pattern in Barbados is such that two terms is usually given to any party, if the governance is excepted maybe a third but never a fourth. Plus within the third term the BLP were so void of fresh ideas and this led to persons then trying to full their pockets. Everyone knows that it is the floating voters who changes a government and this will always be, therefore the new P.M didn’t have to offer bajans so much to gain the government. Now it is folly on Harley Henry to he constantly harping on the Owen Arthiur’s stint in government that for 14 yrs he did nothing. Does he not realise that these same bajans who voted in the DLP also voted three times for the BLP? Is he then telling the bajan voters that they were stupid to vote BLP? Is he questioning the intelligence of bajan voters. As an ardent supporter of the DLP from school days in the ’60’s, I’m a bit disheartened by these “johnies-come-lately” who think that they are the heart and soul of the DLP. These parasites that are sticking on to the P.M’s coat-tail will cause him to lose much ground in the next elections if he don’t start shaking them off right now.


  24. David
    This frequent (almost everyday) articles by both parties, is beginning to turn me off. I don’t mind one article per week but these parties are using BU as a cheap way of spreading political propaganda.


  25. @The Scout

    Please note we post one DLP article per week and the BLP surrogate does not submit more than two. What you we find interesting is the discussion by the BU family arising from the debate.

    On your opinion regarding the value of HH as a political strategist that is conjecture, but a factor which we seem to be forgetting is the Mascoll/Thompson feud which threatened to destroy the DLP as opposition. Many were not sure if the electorate would give Thompson that vote of confidence which you seem to be taking for granted.


  26. Donald Duck Esq.

    Yeah, I read HH’s article and I also read Mia’s statement that the BLP members received their invitations late. Well let’s say that Mia is correct, could they not still have attended? What did they have to do? Buy a dress? Wash their hair? Catch a flight? Did the late invitation set off such a collective pique that they boycotted the event en masse?

    I don’t buy HH’s connecting their non attendance to any class issue but surely some of them could have made an effort to attend it is not everyday that a Bajan wins a Gold medal at an International event like the World Championships.


  27. Sargeant
    Some of them were there but seating in the crowd. I didn’t see the service for Ryan this evening but I was told the M.P for the area George Payne did not participate in the service. If this is so whether it was so or not. I think we have been a nation for too long and to both leading parties, you both have to mature;grow up.


  28. HH wrote “The late Richard Allsopp would have understood what I mean when I say that in this battle for party supremacy, there appears to be an exchange of the sexes.”

    Look HH write what ya feel like.

    But you are no Richard Allsopp, so maybe it it better if you don’t call his name.

    You are not worthy even to wash the feet of the late great linguist.


  29. Ramgoat Liver (and I love your blog handle) wrote “the young Bradshaw girl is a bright young lawyer. Weir is a businessman, who can bring pragmatism. But a couple of others have uncertain depth.”

    Arthur Holder is a good choice too. A bachelor’s degree in business, a master’s degree in social work, a law degree, bright fella ya hear. And significant work experience also. In fact he has a better formal education and more diverse work experience than most any PM or cabinet member. He is not a light weight.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading