Jamaican Harvey Anderson is thankful to his ‘Good Samaritan’ Philippa Pearson.
Jamaican Harvey Anderson is thankful to his ‘Good Samaritan’ Philippa Pearson/Kaieteur Newspaper.

The immigration matter has gone off the boil in recent days. Barbadians maybe waiting on Prime Minister David Thompson to provide an update on the effectiveness of the controversial amnesty scheduled to expire end of year.

One of the most disappointing aspects of the immigration debate sparked by the amnesty has been the vitriolic commentary delivered by Caribbean citizens who should know better. Among those we have academic Professor Norman Girvan who in an interview with a Jamaica radio station used the word ‘Gestapo’ to describe the action of the Barbados government when rounding up illegal immigrants. On the same program Videographer Annalee Davis agreed with the provocative term spewed by Girvan. Soon to follow was former Secretary General of the Commonwealth Shridath Ramphal  who went one step further by referring to the Barbados government actions towards illegal Caricom immigrants as using intimations of ethnic cleansing. He subsequently retreated when he explained he made the statement based on a Nation newspaper report. If we wanted to we could cite several other examples from Prime Minister Ralph Gonzales of St. Vincent, David Commisiong who has been exposed using a fork tongue, Head of the Caribbean Development Bank Compton Bourne a Guyanese tossed his two cents into the pot at the risk of compromising his position which convention regards to be independent, we had many other examples.

After all the rhetoric it was finally agreed that complaints by Guyanese are to be documented by those in charge to allow for formal investigations to take place. Prime Minister David Thompson was quick to point out the actions of unprofessional immigration officers should not be tagged as  government policy. Time will tell the outcome of the investigations after we learned a report was submitted last week by Guyana’s Minister of Foreign Affairs which outlined four complaints to the Barbados government.

At the root of the argument against the new Barbados immigration approach has been the alleged inhumane treatment of Guyanese by Barbados immigration officials when they have been rounded-up. So far we have had an earful from illegal immigrants shouting abuse at our officials, we hope ongoing investigations will put this matter to rest.

BU does not excuse any maltreatment of illegal immigrants by immigration officials. What BU condemns is the holier than thou attitude which President Jagdeo of Guyana and his cronies have directed at Barbados. It is well documented how the Guyanese government has treated with illegal Brazilians and Chinese, some may even refer to how it treats its own citizens three who were arrested for peacefully demonstrating a few days ago. Today a story appeared in the Kaieteur Newspaper which aptly explains the dishonesty by the Jagdeo government.

Here is a snippet:

Despite his traumatic ordeal, a 27-year-old Jamaican is expressing his gratitude to a Guyanese family who provided him with food and shelter when he needed it most. Harvey Anderson was taken in by a North Ruimveldt family after he was found wandering in the Stabroek Market area, following his release from the custody of local drug agents. Anderson had been holidaying in Guyana for a month and when he was about to board a flight back to his homeland on Wednesday morning, he was taken off the flight by anti narcotics officers who claimed that they suspected that he had ingested cocaine.

Jamaican Harvey Anderson is thankful to his ‘Good Samaritan’ Philippa Pearson. “They bring me to a hospital and they did two X-ray on me, and they say I’m discharged. They bring me back to the office, they don’t have no where to put me,” Anderson told this newspaper.

Anderson, who is visiting Guyana for the first time, said that he told the drug agents that he only had one friend in Guyana and could not make contact with him at the immediate moment.

The story above exposes the propaganda by the Jagdeo government for all who want to know. For some strange reason the media in Barbados, Rickey Singh, so-called academics et al have been strangely silent on the dishonesty being spewed by Jagdeo and crew.


  1. @Y. Paris

    I’m in complete agreement with all of your statements.I have absolutely NO idea why the other Governments apart of CSME & are dealing with the illegal immigration mess from one particular country are completely silent.Yet Barbados will now be obligated under so called Skilled ‘Domestic Workers’ to potentially take back those whom were removed & can come back PERMANENTLY & Mr. Thompson has approved of this category in Barbados come Jan. 2010.This is just before the amnesty period expires & can be now considered a permanent Caricom immigration amnesty in Barbados.That is not ‘managed migration’,that is nothing but an expanded Open-door policy.Barbados needs skilled workers,not more burden from those who cannot add to our country’s foundation.

    However,having said that I think if this Open-door policy is going to be the norm.Then Barbados will have no choice but to defer our Border security to Caricom & the following form of Free movement into our country will be the norm.Don’t worry though these are just Business men & women………!
    ——————————————————-
    http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/news/local/07/29/woman-denied-entry-to-barbados-found-with-cocaine-in-luggage/

    -pleads guilty, jailed for four years
    A woman was yesterday fined $2,658,600 and sentenced to four years imprisonment for the possession of narcotics for the purpose of trafficking after she appeared before Magistrate Hazel Octive-Hamilton at the Georgetown Magistrate’s Court.
    20090729shellon

    Reading the facts of the case Police Prosecutor Telford said that Shellon Sancho was taken to CID Headquarters, Eve Leary after she was denied entry into Barbados on July 27. The accused had with her two suitcases and upon the searching of her baggage, a blue package with 2 kilograms, 954 grams of narcotics for the purpose of trafficking was found. The accused was then arrested and told of her charge.

    An unrepresented Sancho had first pleaded not guilty to the charge when it was read to her but later told the judge that she wanted to change her plea. The judge then re-read the charge to which Sancho pleaded guilty asking the judge to be lenient.

    After noting the request by Sancho, Magistrate Octive-Hamilton handed down her judgement. A visibly shaken Sancho quietly accepted her judgement and left the courtroom hiding her face with her rag.


  2. I saw an application in the newpaper to the Immigration Dept for the permission to bring in a house helper, since no-one in Barbados qualified for the job. What next, will there be an application to bring in some-one to cut the lawn too? I was on the outside this afternoon when a afro-guyanese approched me and asked for a job. He was looking for some-one to give him anything to do and place an application for a work permit for him because he does not want to return to guyana. He claims if he returns, he believe he will be killed. I didn;t question him qhy but I gave him $ 50.00 and wish him well . The poor boy was crying.


  3. Scout

    You will soon be getting more of those hard luck stories as the amnesty draws to a close.

    Remember home drums beat first.

    If he was in new york you think he could walk around brooklyn trying that?

    The laws are the laws,get used to it.

    We don’t want to encourage this kind of illegality else we will end up like that failed state guyana.


  4. Anonymous
    I intend to not only hear the “home drum” beating but to beat it myself. My sympathy was in the fact that he was an afro-guyanese and I felt the pain that he was going through. For sure, if he was indo-guyanese, I would not have been $ 50,00 poorer today. We just cannot afford this invasion in my country. I still think that guyanese should be declared political refugees.


  5. Scout, you amaze me. You claim to be a Christian but would help a person in obvious need based solely on his ethnicity? What did the parable of the good Samaritan teach you? Or do you choose to cheery pick from the teachings of He whom you claim to follow?


  6. Brother Scout
    I applaud you.I have my Black Guyanese friends and I assist them wherever possible.We must remember the great Marcus Mosiah Garvey and put “Race First”.

    Brother Scout you must take that action further and do like me JC,and many other Black Barbadians and DO NOT buy anything from the rat catcher/mango seller Indians or Chinese or even White People.Seek out Black owned & operated businesses and spend your money.

    Bother Scout,you are a christian but do not allow being a christian to cause you to be blinded or stupid.Wherever possible support only Black business.

    The Indian rat catcher/mango sellers,the Chinese & Stinking White People can only become rich in Barbados if we Black People who are in the majority support those bastards.

    Boycott those businesses BUY BLACK


  7. Themis
    What being a Christian has to do by being taken for a ride? If I woke up a night and saw a strange man in my house, should I invite him to join me for a drink or should I kill him. Come on, you people got the wrong attitude of Christianity. The culyutr of the indo-guyanese goes contrary to my culture, he would take my money and then try to break into my house for more, therefore I have nothing to do with them FULL STOP


  8. There is an interesting commentary today in the guyanaobservernews.org and kaieteurnewsonline.com written by Freddie Kissoon entitled “Time for the Government to Resign”. Everyone should read the article.


  9. Doea not the culture of the black Nigerian Muslim not go contrary to yours too? And would you not assist him if he were in need? You have not responded to my question about the good samaritan either, other than with some garbled nonsense about a strange man in your house. What has that got to do with whether you should help another human being in need?


  10. Themis keep the conversation within the Guyanese context, please, why you taking it now to Nigeria, that is a whole different story.

  11. mash up & buy back Avatar
    mash up & buy back

    Well,well,well!

    What a difference 2 months make!

    Can you imagine this is the same guyana government and the same Starbroek newspaper,the only difference is that it is not the same country – barbados.
    This time it is Antigua and the guyana government’s attitude along with ramphal and ricky singh are certainly intriguing.

    **************************************
    Guyanese mothers had to lodge children’s passports

    Guyana has written the Antigua and Barbuda government inquiring about its new immigration policy after it received information that the passports of three sets of Guyanese children travelling to that country with their parents were being held by the authorities until their exit.

    Carolyn Rodrigues–Birket
    Foreign Affairs Minister Carolyn Rodrigues–Birkett told Stabroek News yesterday that the three reports came to the ministry recently.

    She recounted one case to this newspaper in which a mother was travelling to the CARICOM sister state with her two children to visit a relative who was residing there legally. When they arrived and handed their immigration forms to the immigration personnel she was asked the routine questions, including her intended length of stay and the address where she was staying.

    According to the minister the authorities took the name of the person with whom she was staying and asked if the children she had were hers. She was then told to sit down while the officer said he was going to get her sister with whom she was staying.

    She waited there for a while and within minutes another officer came and asked for their surnames and then told her that she was required to leave the passports of the children with immigration until she was ready to leave. The woman then told the immigration personnel that she did not agree and after asking to speak with a supervisor, was advised that it was part of the country’s immigration policy and if she did not want to comply she had to take the next flight out.
    Forced to agree
    The woman was forced to agree to leave her children’s passports and was allowed entry into the country.

    Rodrigues-Birkett said the woman’s husband made contact with the ministry and informed it of the situation. He later advised that on their departure, the woman was handed back her children’s passports along with a letter which had an official explanation that it was indeed immigration policy.

    She told Stabroek News that many of the Caribbean countries hold up sovereignty when pronouncing on their immigration policies but she feels that they should at least advise their sister states who would then be able to inform their citizens accordingly.

    “… because we are all part of a community and we should also check whether the retention of the travel documents is a legal procedure,” she emphasized.

    The minister said she was concerned since the passports remain a document of the Government of Guyana and so at least an explanation should be given.

    The Antigua Sun reported yesterday that its Immigration Chief Colonel Ivor Walker could not be reached for comment on the matter as he was out of the country. According to the Sun, over the past few months a steady stream of CARICOM nationals, particularly from Guyana and Jamaica, have been returned to their countries because they had violated the Antigua and Barbuda immigration laws.
    Barbados policy
    An immigration policy which was implemented by the Barbados government upped the temperature on the issue since many CARICOM nationals residing there without the necessary documentation would be sent home if they do not qualify under a set of requirements. They have until December 30 to get themselves in order if they had been residing on the island for eight years prior to December 2005. Those residing there for shorter periods after the stipulated time will have to leave or be removed.

    It was this issue that took centre stage at the 30th Meeting of the Heads of the Caribbean Community which was held here in Guyana.

    Barbados Prime Minister David Thompson had set the ball rolling when he called a press conference a day before the meeting’s official opening to explain his country’s policy.

    At the meeting’s ceremonial opening, President Bharrat Jagdeo emphasized that if nationals were ill-treated by their own people then the region could not expect a third country to receive its citizens in any better way. He said, too, that the region’s work will remain incomplete until the day a child born anywhere in the Caribbean can wake up to a Caribbean minus boundaries and nationalities. It was a direct reference to the Barbados policy which was pilloried following reports of ill-treatment of Guyanese who were awakened from their beds in the wee hours of the morning and then sent home.

    Antigua Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer also addressed the gathering on the matter and his focus was on how the once liberal policy on the island had impacted on the socio-economic infrastructure.

    Spencer had said that Antigua could not sustain a liberal immigration policy amidst the growing threats posed by cross-border criminal activity and the challenges of the global financial crisis. According to him, continuing such an arrangement is counter-productive to his government’s policy of providing the greatest good for its citizens.

    “While Antigua and Barbuda will continue to welcome our brothers and sisters to our shores, our current immigration practices must be re-evaluated. A closer examination is warranted in respect of the capacity of the socio-economic institutions and infrastructure to adequately manage the continued inflow of persons desirous of taking up residency. . .” Spencer had stated.

    A new policy was then introduced but so far its details have been sparse.


  12. These days of austerity as well as relative stress and anxiety about running into debt, most people balk up against the idea of utilizing a credit card to make purchase of merchandise or maybe pay for any occasion, preferring, instead just to rely on the actual tried as well as trusted way of making settlement – raw cash.
    However, if you possess cash available to make the purchase completely, then, paradoxically, that is the best time just to be able to use the card for several good reasons.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading