Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The following email was submitted by a concerned citizen who resides at Vaucluse, St. Thomas and we have reproduced without any changes to the content. It seems that this is an issue which the sitting MP Cynthia Forde for the area has been unable to resolve. Please note that this communication was also sent to Barbados Free Press and the Nation newspaper.

David

There are just a few things that motivate me to write publicly. When something is wrong, legally and morally, and it affects your community, should one be quiet, or should one place it before the society? When one has a small successful business in a supposedly also successful, happy Caribbean Island is it right to intervene in a community issue? What gives one the right to fight on behalf of community? People are doing a development at Vaucluse without Town Planning approval. For several years now I have led a campaign (quietly in our area) against the establishment of a race track in an area of Vaucluse Plantation, adjacent to Dukes, and close to the villages of Shop Hill, Christie Village, Dukes, Whitehall and Vaucluse. In the beginning it was due to the noise and the anti-social aspects of such a thing being established. A child was killed on the roadways by a truck, unlinked to the track. My family and I were nearly killed by a drunk driver in a line of traffic coming away from an event at the dirt track a couple of years ago. Now, with the mode of its development I observe a dangerous trend in Barbados, one that we should be extremely wary of.

At Christmas 2005 there was a Town Hall Meeting at Lester Vaughan School, where objections were voiced against retention of the dirt track, and further objections were voiced against a drag strip, and expansion, and paving, as proposed by the developer. Subsequently written objections were sent to Town Planning and the Minister. One of those who spoke out against this track being established was the Honourable Cynthia Forde, M.P. for St. Thomas. Ms. Forde has been a friend of those who are against the track, and has spoken out against it whenever we, the residents of the community, have asked. We mounted a petition, an unfinished petition, in our community and received 300+ signatures, covering half of Shop Hill and Dukes, which were delivered to the Prime Minister and to Town Planning: against establishment of this track, with grounds. Many of us wrote objections, which were never acknowledged, or responded to.

Town Planning has issued both ‘Stop Orders’ and ‘Enforcement Orders’ on this development, but to no effect.

Thus we see a picture of (on one hand residents, Town Planning and the M.P. for the area Cynthia Forde) speaking out against; and on the other hand we see the owners and developers doing a development without Town Planning approval. Is this OK? Is it legal? Is it morally correct? Should owners be allowed to retain something that has gone against all rules and regulations? Just what kind of people do things this way? The evidence

Attached are 4 Google earth pictures from 2006, showing the area of the track in 2006. As you will observe when you open it and magnify, the track at this time was a dirt track. The track shown was subsequently paved, which you will see in the 2007 Google earth picture in the following link: but even more construction has proceeded in recent weeks. There has been no approval for any development of this track, and it has been at Town Planning for years as an application. Is it OK for people to develop without permission in Barbados? During the last 2 years the people making this track have really gone ahead, by paving, and just this last month they have brought in backhoes, bulldozers, rollers and trucks. They are making real roads on this site.

pic4pic3

pic2pic1

I called Town Planning’s enforcement division on October 3, 2007 when I saw the heavy machines working, and they sent an officer to stop them, but they did not stop. I called again a day later, and they sent an order for them to stop, but they did not. I called Ms. Forde, who called Town Planning. By this time everyone was telling them to stop, and do you know what they did? They did not stop. Yesterday, November 9 2007 I took photos of heavy equipment working at the site, and I took pictures of roads they have made during the past month. I am sending these in another email after this one. From these photos, and looking at the Google Earth images you can PROVE that work is being done, and you can PROVE the time when it was done, and you KNOW that they do not have Town Planning approval. The pictures of the machines working show roads that are NOT ON GOOGLE EARTH- they are brand new!!!

pic13pic12

 

pic11pic10

We the residents said ‘No’. Town Planning said, ‘No’. Minister Forde said, ‘No’. The only person left who can say ‘No’ is the Prime Minister. Will they listen to him and stop?
I have lived in Barbados for 40 years, requesting and being granted citizenship in this special island. I have always believed that Barbados, above all countries in the world, was a place where one was safe from victimisation, where one was protected by the upstanding legacy of our heritage. I thought that all were equal in Barbados under the law. Today I ask a simple question: Are we the special place I thought we were, or not?

Thank you

 

U. Goodenough

Related Article

Is The Town Planning Office Of Barbados Delivering Its Mandate?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

207 responses to “The People Of Vaucluse Said No To Building A Race Track In Their Area, Member Of Parliament Cynthia Forde Said No & The Chief Town Planner Said No, But The Development Continues Anyway ~ Does Anyone Know Who Said YES!”


  1. I sent you 2 emails with attachments this morning, one at 8.09 AM and one at 8.19 AM.

    These emails show and prove that illegal events are occurring and have occurred at Vaucluse. Town Planning has told them to stop, The Ministry has told them to stop, the residents have told them to stop.

    Right now they are going all out as I write this, marling, bulldozing, and making roads.

    ILLEGAL DANGER ILLEGAL DANGER ILLEGAL

    …—…—…—…—…—…—…—…—…—…—…—…—

    Will you please publish the photos and the letter I sent with the evidence?

    We have published, be patient!

    David.


  2. Concerned resident if all you have outlined is factual, and you have provided some pretty damning evidence, it goes to show just how ineffectual and toothless the Town Planning Department is when faced with a shameless, lawless and brazen developer. You say:

    “One of those who spoke out against this track being established was the Honourable Cynthia Forde, M.P. for St. Thomas. Ms. Forde has been a friend of those who are against the track, and has spoken out against it whenever we, the residents of the community, have asked.”

    Well it is time for the Honorable Cynthia Forde, M.P to step up to the plate on behalf of her constituents. Let me make a suggestion. I saw her on the CBC evening news a few nights ago and in the press. What she needs to do is to take the CBC camera crew up to Vaucluse and invite the other media houses and hold a press conference and highlight the alleged illegal activity that is taking place. That is what a true representative would do for their constituents.

    “……and has spoken out against it whenever we, the residents of the community, have asked.” Ask her to do the only thing left (press conference at Vaucluse) because the developer really has no respect for the laws of the land, Town Planner, residents of the area or MP Cynthia Forde.


  3. I must first say that I sympathise with the residents of Vaucluse and its surrounding areas but what this is saying to me that we have a serious set of double standards happening in Barbados.
    These double standards are clearly evident in this situation where Owing has a member of his party supposedly representing the residents of the area now she is supposedly trying to support their cause (now if she is or if she is not is another issue because by saying she is but does nothing really she is not) but despite her attempts to reach a settlement in favour of her people she has been stonewalled by the other part of the double standard and that is the Owing I like collect money Arthur side.
    I will be so bold to state that Owing is prepared to turn a blind eye to this development because the white elite of Barbados are involved and he has been paid off to issue the permissions quietly to them in exchange for some election cash, and the lord knows he really needs another million or two really.
    The movers and shakers of this project are the Coziers from Eastern Land Developments the bidders that want the 4000 odd acres of Barbados Farms lands and one Bizzy Williams another one of those vultures for the same lands.
    So my friend in a nutshell you have not got a hope in hell to keep the race track out with these players being involved and part of it, your best bet is to seek the support of the candidate for the DLP and explain the situation to them and let them focus on it and make it a platform issue then the DLP will address it when they form the gov’t or for the blp to become so aware of the size of the issue that they have no choice but to address it right away(I wish you luck in this approach).
    My best wishes are extended to you for a favourable result.


  4. Dear David

    Thank you, thank you. Thank you for giving us a voice.

    U.


  5. U~can you provide us with a copy of the ‘stop order’ from T&P department?


  6. David, you say it went to the Nation as well. Great, then it will be in the Sunday Sun. This is news. And, the story has been written for them already.


  7. Waterboy the email addresses of Roxanne Gibbs and Vivianne Gittens were on the email we received.


  8. you say it went to the Nation as well. Great, then it will be in the Sunday Sun.
    You must be joking my friend, surely they would not like to anger Bizzy, COW and Owing would they???


  9. Dear David
    No, I am a private citizen, but I know that both stop orders and enforcement orders have been issued many times going back to the year 2000.


  10. As soon as I read this unbelievable story I knew Bizzy and/or COW must be involved. These two guys run Barbados. No matter what Owen says. Owen always says yes to them anyhow. He is in their pocket.
    In fairness I want to hear the developers version of what seems the old white always right saga.
    I expect Bizzy to say its his hard work and talent and he he is taking risks. He will also proclaim blacks looking for handouts. Cow going to state its his hard work,talent and he taking risks. He will also threaten to move his businesses to Argentina and other Caribbean islands.


  11. When it comes to moving the heaven and earth to please,we have to leave it to the Williams brothers and their boy Owen.

    I note that in their Annual Report for 2006, Bizzy brags about facilitating the Flyover project. It is not clear how this was done, there is no clear transparent process that can be seen by which this project was awarded. There is no explanation for the MASSIVE cost over runs…
    Obviously Bizzy is really BIG in Bim.

    No wonder that the TCP would be ignored by such powerful people who are obviously above the laws and rules that guide ‘regular’ folks.

    …thing is that like their colonial forefathers, they actually think that they have our best interest at heart and that we should be eternally grateful for their goodwill..
    I will be surprised if someone don’t whisper in some ears and cause the TCP and MP to back off quietly…

    ..face it, our birthrights have been sold by those we trusted to represent us.


  12. It seems that I must always act as devil’s advocate. First, let me clearly state that I am a motor racing addict. I love all types of motor sports and I hate people speaking of motor sports as a white man sport, and the various facilities are for whites only. Now you are aware of my hobby, I would like you to inform the public which of the below statements angers you.
    Is it the location, noise and anti-social aspect? Or
    Is it the objections of Town Planning, MP for the area and residents? Or
    Do you have problems with the Williams brothers association with the raceway?

    Anything you do we must object.
    Mr. Goodenough, I presume you are a traveler and use the Grantley Adams International Airport. When you leave or enter the island, the airplane pass over many communities and keep endless noise, not once a week, once a month, but almost every minute. Are the residents from these areas have any rights to stop these noises? The various shooting ranges are located in residential areas and the blasts of gunshots are heard miles away; do these residents have any rights? Horseracing is located in residential areas; do residents have any rights pertaining to noise or the smell of excretion? The public endure these things silently.

    Let me go further, Bushy Park Racing complex is closer to a community than Vaucluse, yes, some of the residents might be annoyed, but as a people, they put up with the noise for a short period because Car Racing is the biggest spectator sports in the island.

    In your letter, it seems that you resent a racecourse in the Vaucluse area, thus your language of you having a successful business – that has nothing to with the raceway. A child killed on the roadways by a truck – nothing to do with the raceway; and you nearly killed by a drunk driver coming from dirt track – again no substance since every drivers are confronted with such occurrence daily.

    Now, if you are against the developer ignoring the Town Planning department, I have a problem. However, again, I must beseech you to present a list of objectors from the communities regarding the said raceways and I will say the people are really against it.

    The Barbados Football Association has land in the Gymnasium Complex to build a stadium and due to a certain community objecting, plans are on hold and the same language of noise and anti-social aspects were mentioned.

    Why is it that residents of high end communities against certain sports being developed close to their communities, but the said residents will leave their communities and go to the Stadium, Kensington, the Garrison, the shooting ranges and jump in the various Kadooment bands and do not think about the other communities.

    Do not believe the Democratic Labour Party will stop a sport that has potential to be a major foreign exchange earner? Were you one of the thirty thousands who trek to another community to see two Formula 1 cars entertain the public? Think about it.


  13. Frankology,

    Goodenough has stated:

    “People are doing a development at Vaucluse without Town Planning approval.”

    and

    “Town Planning has issued both ‘Stop Orders’ and ‘Enforcement Orders’ on this development, but to no effect.”

    If these are facts then we should all be worried. You seem to be making a case for development without the requisite permission.

    No matter how much we like motor sport the law is being broken.


  14. Let me hear other residents about this development, lets see the two orders and the reason regarding the objection of these orders.
    Shop Hill is over a mile to the south of Vaucluse and noise usually travel westward with the wind. This is not a community problem, this is a selected few who are objecting to this raceway. Next time you have racing at Vaucluse, visit the areas mentioned by the spokesperson and tell me the noise level. Due to the vast area, car parking scarcely reach residential areas.

    This decision is badenough for a service economy. Elections is in the air. Will communities object to the shouting and entertainment from these platforms


  15. Frankology Tell me are you about to condone people carrying out construction work without the proper permits being in place, I have no reason to doubt the honesty of this persons claim that the developers are acting outside of the law and should this be so our laws should make sure that they are charged before the courts and fined or jailed for breaking the laws of the lands, our problem is most people know that Owing and his cabinet have a price tag attached to them.


  16. I for one am a bit biased to motorsports because I am a fan of it as many others are but if in fact they are moving ahead without permission then it should be stopped and resolved. But on that note what are the real objections to its develpment? Noise, really…… Do you think the Kadooment route should be changed because of all that noise cause not everyone like the partying atmosphere but it is a big tourist attraction and part of our culture so people deal with it for a WHOLE day. Racing is at Vaucluse is probablt once a month so can’t you deal with it or is it that bad? Come on now, people need to see that if all the golf course getting approved then who is to stop the advancement of motorsport as a tourist attraction as well because poeple don’t like racing. It is growing and it will continue to grow to so why not let help the economy and yes the people who own it and par-take in it.

  17. The View From Here Avatar
    The View From Here

    “Today I ask a simple question: Are we the special place I thought we were, or not?”

    I give a simple answer: NOT!!!


  18. My dear Goodenough,
    why have you left where you were born to come to our island to try to impose your will on us whose families have been here from the time Barbados became Barbados. Why are you campaigning against a project that provides harmless entertainment for many thousands of Barbadians and visitors. The Vaucluse race track does no harm to you but provides thousands of Barbadians with something to do that they love and it is legal. There are racetracks in your country so why do you want to come here and deprive us of the simple pleasure of taking part in a sport that we love. Would you prefer that we amuse ourselves smoking and shooting dope instead or getting angry with people like you and developing a national sport of beating you. Young men and women need healthy outlets for their energies and every other sport has government provided facilities that are paid for by the taxes of the thousands of motor sport participants and fans in this country and we don’t fret about that. All we ask is to allow us to have two small areas in our island Vaucluse and Bushy Park where we can enjoy our sport. We are not asking for tax payers money but just to be given permission to practice our sport and pay for it ourselves. I would suggeat that you stop you little campaign against our sport or better still get on your broom and fly back to your country and campaign there against whatever you wish but leave us alone in our little island.

    Motor sport fan


  19. Bizzy the issue for BU is not the building of the race track but more about the approval or lack of which was highlighted in the letter from the resident of the area. We are aware that motor sport has a large attraction in Barbados and it must be catered to in the same way that we cater to all the other sports which do not generate the same kind of interest or revenue.

    Please respond to the approval issue from the T&P. Is it in place? Are there stop orders since 2002? This is our concern because it speaks to a governance issue which BU is concerned about. Further if the concerned resident is a citizen of Barbados they have a right to disagree or petition against anything they see fit in the country, it is their right!


  20. CRIME:
    an act or the commission of an act that is forbidden or the omission of a duty that is commanded by a public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law


  21. Lets deal with class.

    Suppose the said Vaucluse area was landmarked to be a Golf Course, would you be in the forefront to bring an injunction to have it stop? I bet the answer will be a resounding NO!….why, only the status quo will be able to partake in this upperclass sport. We have our children and grandchildren, regardless of colour, creed, sex or faith who wait for months just to see one day of quality motor sports. The ratio of public participation versus violent crime at any motorsport event is zero, yet we see comradie amongst every social sector.

    Yes, I disagree with the developer going ahead with construction, but everyone must ask and I am dealing with the rationale behind the said Goodenough since he state “For several years now I have led a campaign (quietly in our area) against the establishment of a race track in an area of Vaucluse Plantation”. Was the reason to object and continue to object based solely on a certain class that will be badenough for an area that should be goodenought for people of his kind.

    Now, this entire area is almost rab land, if the Williams and the Coziers had embarked on Villas and sprawling multi million country houses, I bet my last dollar, everything would have been goodenought.


  22. Vaucluse area residents, don’t worry about the noise factor. In a few years, the new race track will only be used for holding bicycle and donkey cart races, the same vehicles which will be the primary user of the ABC highway and its magnificent flyovers (if they do manage to get them built).

    The unpalatable truth: $100 oil is just for starters

    First published in the Evening Standard, 9 November 2007

    With the markets hypnotized by the approach of $100 oil, analysts are pointing the finger at all the usual suspects: speculators, the OPEC bogeyman, the weak dollar, soaring consumption in China and India, and geopolitical tensions. All play a part but the real cause is altogether less palatable. The world is running short of oil, and this time it is likely to be permanent.

    SNIP

    Oil production is already falling in 60 of the world’s 98 oil producing countries – including once mighty producers such as the United States, Mexico, Norway, Indonesia and the UK, where North Sea production peaked in 1999 and has already fallen by well over 40%. Aggregate oil production in the OECD peaked in 1997 and has been in decline ever since. It is almost unanimously agreed that oil production in the entire world except for the twelve members of OPEC will peak soon after 2010. ExxonMobil chief executive Rex Tillerson told me recently that non-OPEC production growth would be all over in “two to three years”. So from early in the next decade, by common consent, it’s all down to OPEC.

    OPEC has promised to raise production by 500 thousand barrels per day from this month but many doubt they can increase their capacity much further, because experts believe the cartel has comprehensively overstated its reserves since the mid-1980s. Just last week Sadad al-Huseini, who until recently was the head of production at Saudi Aramco, said that the world’s ‘proved’ reserves had been falsely inflated by 300 billion barrels.

    SNIP

    All of which has led a growing band of senior oilmen including Lord Oxburgh, the former chairman of Shell, and Thierry Desmarest, current chairman of Total, to conclude that global oil production could soon peak and go into decline. At which point oil prices could double from current levels, sparking an economic and social crisis to put the sub-prime meltdown in the shade.

    http://www.davidstrahan.com/blog/?p=74

    Peak oil: BP, Conoco and IEA all say it’s there


  23. Frankology,

    Let’s deal with facts not emotion.

    Goddenough is not bringing any injunction he is merely asking for the enforcement of the law by those who have the responsibility to do so.

    The developer has rights and the resident(s) have rights. There is a planning process and in this case it seems to have been abused in a most cavalier manner by the developer.

    Right now we have only heard one side if the story and it would be great to have someone from the developer’s side contribute and not the emotional piffle about “our children and grandchildren, regardless of colour, creed, sex or faith who wait for months just to see one day of quality motor sports”.

    We may all love motorsports but when the lawful authorities and planning process are ignored we are surely half way down a abyss from which there is no return.

    “In the state of nature…all men are born equal, but they cannot continue in this equality. Society makes them lose it, and they recover it only by the protection of the law. ”
    Charles de Montesquieu (1689 – 1755)


  24. Frankology:

    The thread is not about whether or not Vaucluse Raceway should be developed, the Chief Town Planner according to Goodenough has temporarily ruled No.

    The issue is the blatant disregard for the legal process, a point Bizzy totally disregards in his comment.

    It may be OK for him to wake up one morning with flyovers spinning in his head, a scheme which the government (may have) adopted and sanctioned.
    It is quite another to develop his land in this way, against some local wishes, without the necessary permissions.

    It sounds a good idea to me, if done with due regard to his neighbours and our law.


  25. Waterboy I am not emotional, I am dealing with the primary cause. You all might be emotional because one person states that a ‘stop order’ was issued, yet we see no evidence.
    What I am trying to divulge from the objector is
    his rationale to object. I admit that going against the direction of the TPD is incorrect but can we not be ojective to get the truth. There is no legality with someone collecting signatures. What we need to find out if these signatures are legitimate residents close to the said raceway and might be effected by noise or uncharacteristic behavior. Again, let us see the signatures and their locations. As I said, the area that he is speaking about are areas far from the racecourse where noise will not impact by the residents far less illegal parking. Which part of Shop Hill is he speaking about, the upper class development or the middle and lower section. These are questions that must be answered before we get in bed with Mr. Goodenough personal agenda. We are only hearing from him.


  26. could we not discuss motorsports? This is about the willfull civil disobedience to a lawful stop order. It shouldn’t matter to us what they were building and for what purpose. That was for Town and country planning to rule on and they did. Why are these citizens not abiding the ruling? Are we a country of laws or the lawless? How am i suppose to view this latest action against, let say the the Goodridge Highgate beating? Where in that case we were all emplored to wait on the law and justice. In the latter justice was not needed as an out of court settlement was prefered, in the aforemention a legal ruling was made only to be ignored. Why is it that one set of citizens are told to observe and abide by the law, and another set thinks that they can ignore it?


  27. Let us hear from the people of Town Planning on this matter or the developers. We are hearing only ONE VOICE.


  28. I would also like to hear the views of the Opposition candidate for St. Thomas.


  29. I am appalled at the arrogance of Bizzy in his submission, because he controls the PM does not mean that he can control the minds and the wishes of the people of Barbados, he may have the money to buy the likes Owing and Forde but he is not able able to manipulate the masses as is trying to do.
    Another annoying aspect of his submission is his call to the writer to go back to where he came from and to leave he and his friends alone to corrupt the peaceful nature of the place, he is absolutely and completely out of place with his arrogance in this call it is disgusting and annoying why should he want this person to leave this island if he is a citizen of this island grossly unreasonable.
    Then again we have learnt that power corrupts and power comes in many forms and money being an etremely powerfull one, and Bizzy and the Coziers do not lack in that department hence their bulldozer mentality.

  30. More-than-interested-bystander Avatar
    More-than-interested-bystander

    Truly, there really is no nice response possible to the blatant arrogance from Bizzy. Who does he think he is anyhow to tell caring citizens of Barbados to go back to where they came from?? Looks to me like if Mr Bizzy had his way anyone coming into our island would have to pass a test that demands that the new-comer pledge obedience and obeisance to any wishes from demanded of the drag/car racing addicts of the island. Lord help us!


  31. Motorsport is moronic anyway!

    Get the people out doing some exercise for a change!

    Big fat boy-racers we don’t need!


  32. I am truly disappointed with Bizzy’s response to this affair for someone that is so intimately involved with this project I would have expect a more conscious reply from him.
    It makes me wonder if he has consulted with his new wife Shelly before attacking these lowly Barbadians she to would have grown up in places such as this and I wonder how she feels about her husbands bulldozer mentality in a nice village like Vaucluse.


  33. Bizzy’s arrogance knows no limits. I have listened to Bizzy over the years . The man shows no humility just rude crude arrogance. Mind you Bizzy is the spokesman for the white minority. Dont let anyone be fooled about that. Richard Hoad and Loveridge are only whites courageous enough to disagree with his arrogance. Bizzy’s reply to Goodenough is a carbon copy of his disgusting attacks on Whittingham the English engineer who dared to question the flyovers. Frankology is an apologist for Bizzy. No need to guess his origins.

    Desperately poor squatters are unceremoniously evicted by TCP yet rich whites break same laws with impunity. Power thru the millions he rakes in from black taxpayers has gone to Bizzy’s head . He thinks he is invinceable and he speaks and acts that way. In his crude submission as usual he acts as though he speaks for all Barbadians. He certainly does not speak for me. Unlike the Highgate gardens Goodridge race matter the Vacluse affair should remain in public domain until resolved. The public awaits word from TCP and Minister in charge.


  34. It is quite possible and most probable that the “Bizzy” comment was not by Mr. Ralph “Bizzy” Williams. Just someone using his name.


  35. How anyone in their right mind could be convinced that the REAL Bizzy Williams wrote the post is beyond me.

    Were I a betting man I would lay my life on the line that Bizzy did not write that post. I have seen far too many letters written to the mainstream media by Bizzy that were professional. Bizzy would not post crap like this. He might say the same thing but it would be grammatically, spelling wise etc perfect.

    What I think has everyone upset about it is the tone of the post and no one has thought about how the post was actually written. There are too many errors of all kinds from small letters instead of capitalized ones being used and other such give aways to convince me the post is a hoax.

    This is one of the downsides to blogging. You may have an opportunity to say your piece but it has to be done as though we were white and black shadows and in the end accomplishes little.

    Another thing that discredit blogs are people using other Posters names.

    I noted a post on Vaucluse by “Green Monkey” a monicker I used on the DLP blog but the post on here by that name is not me I can assure you not that I give a s—-t. I just want to show you why in many cases Blogs are not in my opinion taken seriously other than to provide a forum for people to vent their frustrations.


  36. Green Monkey has posted on environmental issues long before you joined the DLP site.

    I know it must be hard for you, No Name, to keep check on all your various noms de plume but this time you are the one hoisted by your own petard.

    I don’t think the real Green Monkey will protest.


  37. Stright talk

    That is just my point are you “Straight Talk” or are you “Green Monkey” responding. I rest my case sir!


  38. And would it matter.


  39. Squatter, I am a born black bajan ’cause my navel string bury hey!. I am not Bizzy apologist, nor Owen and the BLP apologist, nor David and the DLP apologist, nor any blogs apologist. I deal with issues not with political agendas. I agree with NO NAME regarding the writer saying he/she is BIZZY. The real Bizzy Williams will have to be totally stupid to make such antagonistic remarks.

    I am awaiting the posting of these TPD orders and the bona fide signatures. Otherwise, my feelings of class segregation based on statements will never change.


  40. The petition was carefully done, and the signatures came from Dukes tenantry, Shop Hill, Shop Hill Terrace, and Eastern Land Development production. Anyone who knows the area is now beyond a shadow of a doubt as to who signed. We haven’t finished yet either- there is still the rest of Shop Hill, Grand View, Christie Village, Whitehall. We hope to butt Liz cross there.

    And probably coincidently, just a couple of weeks after signatures were submitted, Government census takers came round and determined who lived in the area and in the houses of the Village.

    Barbados Undergound we thank you for publishing the facts.


  41. And doesn’t anybody find it amazing to read pages 50 and 51 of the Sunday Nov 11 Advocate, announcing future track paving works and development? Knowing that there is no Town Planning approval? It is on the club website too.

    This is the area I grew up in- Shop Hill and Vaucluse. This special place, this wonderful place, Barbados, my home, our unique, special Island. We’ve got cancer.


  42. BU wishes to confirm that we can’t confirm that the commenter under the moniker ‘Bizzy’ is the Bizzy we all know and love. What we can say is the BU household was out and about yesterday and say Bizzy and family having a rollicking good time. So if the ‘Bizzy’ commenter visits BU again and can indicate where he was at 1.30PM yesterday we would all know that the ‘Bizzy’ poster is the real mckoy!


  43. U.Goodenough~until we get a read of the’ stop order’ we will be going around in circles on this one.The big premise on which you have built your argument is the illegal development of the race track.

    We need to see the ‘stop order’.


  44. Sunday Advocate, Sunday November 11, 2007, page 50

    Headline – Weather proofing for RallySprint track at Vaucluse

    Excerpts form story

    “No more mud or clay will be on the surface of Vaucluse Raceway when the 2008 RallySprint cup rolls off next year”

    That is what chairman of the Vaucluse Raceway Motor Sports Club (VRMSC), Greg Cozier said they have planned……..

    “The surface will be compacted and semisealed with the secret RallySprint formulae,” said Cozier in the closing remarks.

    Snip

    Cozier said that there are plans to have motorcross, which is circuit racing for rally cars , once again at the facility.

    Snip

    “……… our long term plan is to have six events per year…..”

    Snip

    “….Building a club house and planting trees “, are two of the things they have for the future.

    Read the full story in the Sunday Advocate


  45. David

    I am a private citizen.

    Would you like to see DVD footage of works, dated works, done over the past 30 days? There are 4 of them now. How would something like this get onto the website?

    Could doing work without Town Planning permission also be worth consideration? Not being a lawyer could place residents and objectors at a disadvantage, but one would consider doing unauthorised development to be against the law. I can prove this with extensive footage, have proved it above, but for the blogs have only submitted a bare couple of pictures.

    Let’s see how it plays out. We have faith that doing things through the right channels will vindicate us, whereas at this stage a developer of some kind may be seeking to look for a convenient legal loophole, some big-up contacts, and some really good spin. We are watching.


  46. By the way, dozens of copies are in circulation. It will do no good to search for someone to beat.


  47. Clearly you’re NOT Goodenough…

    How about a little proof regarding all the stop orders that TCP allegedly issued.

    How about a copy of the petition with 300 names on it. You are able enough to take photos, use Google Earth and burn videos to DVD. Clearly you must be able to use a scanner also.

    While on the topic of Google Earth, the map in the attached link shows nothing different to your attached photos.

    So Mr. GoodEnough, please bring us some proof of your allegations before flinging any more unqualified accusations around.


  48. Can you get one of the signatures to submit a copy of the enforcement order to David. We need to get to the substance of this objection.

    By the way, will 6 out of 365 days caused you such agony. The residents below Mount Stinkero lives it daily, The residents from as far as Maxwell Hill right below the airport must endure the noise daily, you have been waking up since 2000 with this raceway on your mind. you have 359 days of relaxation. Enjoy it and give thanks.


  49. So why does the ABC and Flyovers bother you Frankology? there are other roads you can use too…


  50. I have no problem with the dual carriageway, I have a problem like you with the $360 million, I have a problem with The Impact and Environmental Study along with the proposed meeting, I have a problem with the weakening of our limestones, thus, a true status from Hillis Carnes. I also have a problem with a company without any prior road building or flyovers construction, I have a problem with all this money being spent of Flyovers that will never solve our traffic problem. This is a clear example of partisan politics as display by commenters of your kind. You need to get the facts about this blog, what I am seeing is simply a personal vendetta and using all of you as pawns.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending