The following email was submitted by a concerned citizen who resides at Vaucluse, St. Thomas and we have reproduced without any changes to the content. It seems that this is an issue which the sitting MP Cynthia Forde for the area has been unable to resolve. Please note that this communication was also sent to Barbados Free Press and the Nation newspaper.

David

There are just a few things that motivate me to write publicly. When something is wrong, legally and morally, and it affects your community, should one be quiet, or should one place it before the society? When one has a small successful business in a supposedly also successful, happy Caribbean Island is it right to intervene in a community issue? What gives one the right to fight on behalf of community? People are doing a development at Vaucluse without Town Planning approval. For several years now I have led a campaign (quietly in our area) against the establishment of a race track in an area of Vaucluse Plantation, adjacent to Dukes, and close to the villages of Shop Hill, Christie Village, Dukes, Whitehall and Vaucluse. In the beginning it was due to the noise and the anti-social aspects of such a thing being established. A child was killed on the roadways by a truck, unlinked to the track. My family and I were nearly killed by a drunk driver in a line of traffic coming away from an event at the dirt track a couple of years ago. Now, with the mode of its development I observe a dangerous trend in Barbados, one that we should be extremely wary of.

At Christmas 2005 there was a Town Hall Meeting at Lester Vaughan School, where objections were voiced against retention of the dirt track, and further objections were voiced against a drag strip, and expansion, and paving, as proposed by the developer. Subsequently written objections were sent to Town Planning and the Minister. One of those who spoke out against this track being established was the Honourable Cynthia Forde, M.P. for St. Thomas. Ms. Forde has been a friend of those who are against the track, and has spoken out against it whenever we, the residents of the community, have asked. We mounted a petition, an unfinished petition, in our community and received 300+ signatures, covering half of Shop Hill and Dukes, which were delivered to the Prime Minister and to Town Planning: against establishment of this track, with grounds. Many of us wrote objections, which were never acknowledged, or responded to.

Town Planning has issued both ‘Stop Orders’ and ‘Enforcement Orders’ on this development, but to no effect.

Thus we see a picture of (on one hand residents, Town Planning and the M.P. for the area Cynthia Forde) speaking out against; and on the other hand we see the owners and developers doing a development without Town Planning approval. Is this OK? Is it legal? Is it morally correct? Should owners be allowed to retain something that has gone against all rules and regulations? Just what kind of people do things this way? The evidence

Attached are 4 Google earth pictures from 2006, showing the area of the track in 2006. As you will observe when you open it and magnify, the track at this time was a dirt track. The track shown was subsequently paved, which you will see in the 2007 Google earth picture in the following link: but even more construction has proceeded in recent weeks. There has been no approval for any development of this track, and it has been at Town Planning for years as an application. Is it OK for people to develop without permission in Barbados? During the last 2 years the people making this track have really gone ahead, by paving, and just this last month they have brought in backhoes, bulldozers, rollers and trucks. They are making real roads on this site.

pic4pic3

pic2pic1

I called Town Planning’s enforcement division on October 3, 2007 when I saw the heavy machines working, and they sent an officer to stop them, but they did not stop. I called again a day later, and they sent an order for them to stop, but they did not. I called Ms. Forde, who called Town Planning. By this time everyone was telling them to stop, and do you know what they did? They did not stop. Yesterday, November 9 2007 I took photos of heavy equipment working at the site, and I took pictures of roads they have made during the past month. I am sending these in another email after this one. From these photos, and looking at the Google Earth images you can PROVE that work is being done, and you can PROVE the time when it was done, and you KNOW that they do not have Town Planning approval. The pictures of the machines working show roads that are NOT ON GOOGLE EARTH- they are brand new!!!

pic13pic12

 

pic11pic10

We the residents said ‘No’. Town Planning said, ‘No’. Minister Forde said, ‘No’. The only person left who can say ‘No’ is the Prime Minister. Will they listen to him and stop?
I have lived in Barbados for 40 years, requesting and being granted citizenship in this special island. I have always believed that Barbados, above all countries in the world, was a place where one was safe from victimisation, where one was protected by the upstanding legacy of our heritage. I thought that all were equal in Barbados under the law. Today I ask a simple question: Are we the special place I thought we were, or not?

Thank you

 

U. Goodenough

Related Article

Is The Town Planning Office Of Barbados Delivering Its Mandate?

207 responses to “The People Of Vaucluse Said No To Building A Race Track In Their Area, Member Of Parliament Cynthia Forde Said No & The Chief Town Planner Said No, But The Development Continues Anyway ~ Does Anyone Know Who Said YES!”


  1. Frankology I am sorry you misled me and others with the intent of your message it appeared you had some knowledege of something relative to the matter that was negative to Goodenough but it appears it was only a rambling comment, I thought you were making a meaningful contribution on the subject.
    Seems to me that the purpose was to threaten in the hope he would shut up!!
    Round 1 to Goodenough.


  2. I am not a politician but merely a citizen that has had enough of this nonsense of stealing and corruption and fooling of the masses with razzmatazz, and fireworks, I have chosen to speak out about the state of affairs taking place in this island.
    I am just like you and so many others, simply a peaceful Bajan trying to own a piece of this rock for my children and their children’s children.
    Trying to avert further disaster coming to this lovely island by further stealing and further corruption.
    I would love to see what you have.


  3. How about 8 AM?


  4. OK
    I have now found a way. Check some pretty bad camera videos, but here’s preliminary evidence. Remember, the DVDs show a chronological sequence of events during the months of October and November.

    You’ll be surprised to see the extent of what is going on

    This is no tiny thing place for boys to play. This is a HUGE illegal development. Why are the authorities silent? It is not right.


  5. How can you be misled when I told the BU family I am awaiting concrete evidence with information regarding a feud/vendetta between these two wealthy St. Thomas residents? This I am still awaiting so WIV open your neutral brains and forget your political agenda and stop being sidetrack by pathetic writers. From the beginning of this post, your mind was made up that everything within is the gospel, although I asked questions up top of questions for facts regarding the issuing of orders by the TPD and received stupid excuses and up to now this writer failed to garnish this post with a copy although he made statement of copies in circulation. You must deal with the primary caused which is missing and stop dealing with someone taking pictures on a daily basis to substantiate his personal disapproval.
    I realise that you will be meeting this writer, and I hope you get the facts along with your observation of the location of Dukes on the North and Shop Hill on the south. While you are there, check with the people by the Sanitation Department depot west of Vaucluse and ask them if noise emits from the race course.

    Now to Ms Goodenough, your mind is so set in getting out your vendetta that you failed to see that I was submitting research after reading your posts. I am still adamant about those orders from the TPD, thus your statement from your post of “You’re chronologically challenged, but you are slowly learning. You aren’t disputing existence of the petition any more though? ”
    Read your 2006 letter to the Nation and tell me where in this letter is anything about “Stop Orders”. I await your answers.

    This is the first time I know of any injunction with this race course until you made your postings which I read and found many doubts regarding the validity of facts. All my research was done based on your statements.


  6. Am I wrong Senor Goodenough? Or you want me disclose to the public your ultimate motive.

    So you are still waiting concrete evidence with information regarding a feud/vendetta between these two wealthy St. Thomas residents? This I am still awaiting.

    Nevertheless you opt to threaten the writer by stating Am I wrong Senor Goodenough? Or you want me disclose to the public your ultimate motive.

    To DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC WHAT? and when?

    If you are still seeking or looking for this evidence how can you threaten to disclose something you do not have?

    That was simply my point you issued threats that were uncalled for!!!


  7. Goodenough, you could have substantiate your posting by taking videos of the houses in close proximity of the race tracks, not equipment and marl. You will have about twelve houses to the south of track and you are not a resident. The other houses are so far that you would be unable to to see one single house top. Deny those facts.


  8. Did BU state it have information regarding Operation Free Flow on October 21, 2007.

    We promised yesterday to deliver the latest decisions to be made regarding the 3S project. We have to reverse our decision because of the possibility that our sources maybe compromised. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the BU family.

    Only neutral and honest people would use this line. The others with agenda, will babble and include innuendos and deceit to get over a point. Not me, I wait and do research before I write simply, because I hate lies.


  9. BU, be careful, your headline looks like The Advocate maskhead. Just an observation.


  10. Watch Barbadians break the law. They have no planning permission.
    Everyone in Barbados should go to this link and see for themselves. It is wrong!


  11. Thanks, Frankology. I guess that taking the time to research the Nation archives means that you do not have an agenda. I guess that 30 out of 109 contributions to this blog also do not indicate an agenda. Thanks for putting me straight.


  12. Frankology that would be ok because the Advocate is considered to be a BLP sympathizer.


  13. David, I must say that the BU based on my observation is a fairer player dealing with issues. You ensure that blogs and submissions are not too one-sided, and you ensure commenters published information that can be substantiated, we know some might fall thru the shoot. Keep up your good work.


  14. U.Goodenough please record your DVD footage on Google video. You will need to open a gmail account we think.

    When you are finish send us the links.


  15. Peltdownman, I always wanted to be a lawyer but due to financial constrains and being within a single parent, my ambitions went thru the door. This is the reason I do lots of research before writing in these blogs. Thanks for following my progress within this blog. This is the last time I will tell you, I have no agendas, political, religious or personal, I am simply, the devil’s advocate. Neutral and jus’ lovin’ it.


  16. We are hearing of Enforcement Orders being delivered, but people, we have a slight problem. When an enforcement order is being enforced, the TPD would have been accompanied by officer(s) of The Royal Barbados Police Force. Check with the Belle Zone 1 water issue.


  17. Once again i have to refer readers to http://www.barbadosforum.com where a lengthy discussion on Motorsports took place. I came to the conclusion then that a lot of the confusion and controversy surrounding motorsports, starts from a position of class and colour. This does not take away from some of the legitimate concerns raise by citizens from time time, the evidence in some case demonstrated the validity, of the complaints. What i notice on one occasion after there was several complaints made during a staging of an event, was a concerted effort by the motorsports organizers to address all those concerns. I have since then been of the view that they have demonstrated a willingness to come to the table with concern citizens to address differences and issues. This current controversy isn’t about motorsport, it is about constructing something without permission and as Frank, and noname and others are saying, it should be easy to prove if the construction is occuring without permission.

    http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=905&view=findpost&p=9511

    http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=3581&view=findpost&p=35632


  18. The first link you sent from Barbados forum contained a blogger who said in 2004 that Vaucluse was told NO.

    No means NO.

    This blog is not solely about whether it is illegal or not, but this plays a huge part in showng up the way these things get forced down good and innocent peoples’ throats.

    1) We have objected to the plans as is our right, and we have not been answered. That is a valid point.

    2) They have developed a racetrack illegally, and by God they should not have done that because if allowed they have legalised crime in Barbados.

    All hail the newly indoctrinated 18,000 criminals, screaming and drinking at their illegally constructed venue on November 30!

    God bless our criminal heritage!


  19. Goodenough. Are you the Ursula. W. Goodenough?


  20. Adrian Hinds

    it should be easy to prove if the construction is occuring without permission.
    ________________________________
    It should be even easier to produce the permit, if permission has been granted. Let’s face it, it’s the developers who are being accused here. Once they produce the TCP permit to develop the land as a motor racing track, then everything we have been arguing about will be history. I suspect that it will be difficult to see a copy of any stop order, if it exists, as it will take a brave man in TCP to take the risk of producing it.


  21. Please let the public know if you above person. “Yes” is three letters and “No” is just two. We await your speedy reply.

    Remember you said you was dealing with this issue from 2000.


  22. The fact that it can only be dated after the work has been undertaken would then be the proof in the promise, would it not? Our leaders would never do this to us.


  23. Hi Frank
    Strange, I can’t seem to recall whether I have a middle name or not. Guess no might be the answer, but I’m not sure.

    I know there are lots of Goodenoughs around. We have a whole village at Dukes.


  24. U.G. You seems to be a stranger from the truth, possibly, this might be an evolutionary affair, thus, the difficulty in getting simple information from you, since you prefer to doctored vital information. I done with this issue for now. I am doing some research.


  25. Glad to hear it. The deeper you look, the more you will find.

    But while doiong research don’t forget to check these 2 links to show some of the illegal work presently being done at the site, these ones from Nov 10 I think, but recent work going back to Oct 3.

    Happy Independance in advance to one and all, criminals and lawfuls.


  26. What do these videos have to do with anything? You have been repeatedly asked for some kind of proof as to the existence of a stop order, and so far none has been forthcoming.

    All these videos show is construction work being carried out. This work – without the confirmation of a stop order being given – could VERY well be 100% LEGAL!


  27. U. Goodenough we are afraid that we agree with 4more and others. Unless you introduce the stop order or some official document which supports your claim this story may well end up in the toilet. Just showing the videos and talking about illegal construction going on may not be good enough.


  28. David, I am asking you, Frankology, Adrian Hinds et al to let us know how you would go about obtaining a copy of the stop order. Better still, if it’s that easy, why don’t you try and get a copy yourselves?


  29. peltdownman there is the obvious reason why we cannot pursue your request.

    There is also the answer that the onus is always on the person bringing the charge to produce the overwhelming evidence.

    We have provided a voice for U.Goodenough

    We think we have done our part. We can go further and say we called the T&C tel# 246 467 3000 and asked to be transferred to a Town Planner but the phone rang and rang and rang.

    We called back to ask the receptionist about the stop order but she again firmly directed us to one of the ringing phones at the T&C department. It would be good if one of our many readers with the contacts can call and put this matter to bed.


  30. David this was my suggestion from the very start that Frankology who is renowned for his research work may have taken the bull by the horns and contacted the TCP department and gotten to the bottom of this.


  31. Does Anyone Know Who Said YES!
    __________________________

    David, this is your headline. It doesn’t ask “Who said NO?”


  32. As far as I’m concerned, whoever levels the charges must also obtain the evidence. Innocent until proven guilty my friend.


  33. Smoke and mirrors. You can’t be wrong and get right.


  34. U.G. Yes you can. Once you have been vindicated.


  35. You haven’t proven that they’ve ever BEEN wrong!!


  36. The facts:

    Stop order/stop orders have been delivered to the owner of said area.

    Enforcement order/ enforcement orders have been delivered to owner of area.

    As far back as 2000.

    Residents have submitted objections.

    Owner has developed without Town Planning permission.

    Let the owner come forward and explain the rationale as to the development activity in October and November; the development in the year before 906/07) of paving the track.

    In the Utube links I have proven to you that development is going on. That’s your elephant. No amount of smoke or mirrors can make it disappear now.

    It’s ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!

    If this project is allowed anyone can do anything in Barbados. Lawyers may use obfuscation, but the facts are the facts.

    And those are the facts. You can try and bring some ‘false facts’ but Illegal is Illegal is illegal. I’ll continue to speak the truth for as long as I live.

    Come and beat me now. I will never stop fighting for right in Barbados for as long as I live. Let Bajans decide where Barbados is going, and choose who is right, we or you.

    And let Bajans decide what kind of Island we will be going forward into the future, wicked and lawless as against upstanding and lawful.


  37. Anytime an enforcement order is issue, a police officer should be present.


  38. Not sure what you are talking about. Do you know something? An ‘enforcement’ order or a ‘stop’ order? Also which ones do we refer to? In which of the years?

    Speaking of police officers though, we understand that the Royal Barbados Police Force is required to police any events held in Public. And the Chief Magistrate is required to grant a licence to sell alcohol.

    If anyone is saying that instructions by Town and Country Planning can been disregarded, and that they may be using some kind of technicality to do so, then we call upon these institutions to DENY any APPLICATIONS by evaders of the law, and invaders of our residential area.

    And not only that, THEY HAVE NO PLANNING PERMISSION TO BUILD A RACETRACK UP THERE!


  39. we need the race track

    its a great place to go

    and it brings lots of money

    build it


  40. Jeff,

    Maybe we need a race track.

    Maybe it is a great place to go.

    But, tell us:

    How much money it brings?

    How it brings the money?


  41. Professor U. W. Goodenough, you are trying to pretend that you are one of our sisters with lesser educational trying to gain empathy from the public , thus, your behaviour of not understanding what is an ‘enforcement order’. This is not a bajan legal jargon, it is a universal legal instrument used to retard any activity that is illegal. A uniformed police officer usually accompany officers of the TPD whilst issuing these said orders.

    One week gone and you fail to present one single copy of the enforcement order, although you said copies were circulated.


  42. You can quote smoke and mirrors all you want… The only smoke around here is the smoke you are trying to blow up everyone’s – – –


  43. it if the track owners do the right thing
    it will bring RACER FROM all over

    the country to the area they need a hotel to stay at a gas station a resterant

    and all that good stuff no including

    the estimated 8.000 or so fans in the seats

    all that together will be way over the millon doller mark


  44. With regards to the money brought into the country by motorsport: Rally Barbados sees ~30 foreign competitors arrive every year to the island. Each competitor ships a car, a crew, family, friends and equipment. They stay in hotels and rent local houses, they eat at restuarants in the area, they go on trips and typically stay for a fortnight or more making the most of the island’s facilities. All in a typically quiet time of year for tourism. Similarly, the event brings in thousands of fans who further utilise local facilities puring more money into the economy.

    Last year Vaucluse Raceway held an international event for RallyCross and this had a similar effect with a full compliment of the world’s finest machinery being shipped across the Atlantic.

    The money being brought in is of no question and is a documented, acknolwedged benefit to the ecomomy.

    While motorsport has some detractors who see it as elitist or encouraging problems on the roads, this is always a myth perpetuated by those who have never taken the time to look at it any more closely than a passing glance at a loud modified car on the road.

    The sport is followed by, supported by, entered by and maintained by all levels of class, color and creed. In fact, it’s one of the wonderful few places where class, color and creed are completely irrelevant as the only things people really care about are skill and talent.

    Similarly, the problems on Bajan roads are not brought about by those who compete in motorsport. They are brought about by generic idiots who would be doing what they are doing regardless of background activities.

    The ‘international’ racing events held at Bushy Park are immensely popular with the fans, but only at a more regional level with competitors, as the facility is nowhere near the standard required to attract geniune international competitors.

    If Barbados had a high grade motorsport facility (be it at Bushy Park or Vaucluse, or both) it would attract futher foreign competitors, further foreign money, further tourism income and help further nurture the island’s own innate motorsport talent which has had to make do with canefields, broken race tracks and minor intermittment investment.

    And no, I am not an investor at Vaucluse or in anyway associated with the facility. I am a motorsport fan who would like to see the island and the island’s God-given talent get the facilities and coverage it deserves.

    Graeme.


  45. Hello
    Not sure if I’m educated or uneducated. Some and some maybe. Hello, ,and happy Monday.

    Over the weekend the areas of the track were rolled by a steamroller. I have pictures of the steam roller, the track, and I shall send them to Barbados Underground and Barbados Freepress after posting this.

    This arrogant and high-handed behaviour is just another signal that our democracy in Barbados is under threat. These peole think they can do anything they want. And still we see the posters of the friends and supporters who cannot seem to understand:

    It’s ILLEGAL.


  46. Sure me the orders and I will walk with you.


  47. Until you show me the stop orders, you are a LIAR!


  48. Show me the orders and I will walk with you.

  49. Proof-free Pudding? Avatar
    Proof-free Pudding?

    I’ve read this all with some interest, and though it really doesn’t matter to me either way whether vaucluse is expanded or not, simply in the interest of a good logical debate I must say that U. Goodenough seems to be intentionally ignoring the fundamentals; either that or they are quite dense. No one has disputed that flouting laws of the land cannot be condoned. Not a single person, not even Frankology. Forgive the caps, but UG seems unable after so many posts to understand this basic concept, so I’m hoping to make it clearer: PICTURES OF CONSTRUCTION DO NOT SUBSTANTIATE YOUR CONTENTION THAT THE CONSTRUCTION IS ILLEGAL. A roller being illegally used looks… well… the same way it would if it were being used for a legal purpose. Reading their myriad cries of “I have DVDs of contruction” and “Look! Look! A bulldozer bulldozing!” was only slightly less painful than being kicked in the nuts.


  50. If it doesn’t matter to you either way, why are you shouting?

    Too exhausted to write tonight.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading