Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

There is the famous line “the law is an ass” which has been attributed to many through time. What it means is that sometimes when the law is applied, it achieves an absurd result.

Today the Barbados High Court issued the following order as summarised by Barbados Today:

The High Court has quashed a magistrate’s decision to commit former CLICO chairman Leroy Parris to stand trial on charges stemming from the alleged theft of $3.3 million from the insurance company.

Justice Michelle Weekes also prohibited the Director of Public Prosecutions from proceeding with the matter.

Parris’ attorney, King’s Counsel Hal Gollop, welcomed the ruling, saying his client felt vindicated.

However, King’s Counsel Roger Forde, appearing for the State, confirmed that an appeal will be filed, saying that “at some point in time, Mr Parris will face the jury”.

A scan of the BU Archives and the wider public record shows one thing clearly: Barbadians remain baffled at how the former CLICO Holdings CEO Leroy Parris has escaped accountability after having a $3.3 million cheque issued to himself by his sidekick, former CLICO Financial Controller Terrence Thornhill. That such a blatant and desperate act by Parris – bailing from a failing insurance company – could slide past the justice system without consequence will continue deflate public confidence in the legal system..

For those with short memories of which Barbadians are known – about 11,000 policyholders in Barbados were affected by the collapse of CLICO, and the government eventually took a hit of $400 million i.e. taxpayers. Despite the taxpayers having to underwrite CLICO’s mess, Parris’ lawyer was emboldened to express – post verdict today – that Parris deserved the $3.3 million payment at a time the company was experiencing financial difficulties.

In a forensic audit Accounting House Deloitte’s stated that the “$3.3 million cheque issued to Leroy Parris was not supported by any legitimate documentation, not authorised under CLICO’s policies, and could not be justified as a lawful payment“. Barbados is a nation of laws and we must live in hope that justice will be served. The country will await the appeal process. In the meantime Leroy Parris continues with his life in his octogenarian years. While his other sidekick the late Prime Minister David Thompson looks up at the shenanigans.

What unfolded in the High Court today is more than a legal transaction – it is a stress test of Barbados’ credibility as a modern justice system. When a transaction that auditors deemed wrong can be trumped by legal poppycock, it exposes something deeper: the widening gap between what the public understands as justice and what the court delivered as law. A gap where distrust will continue to fester.

The appeal now becomes more than a legal formality. Barbados cannot afford a justice system that appears selective in its decisions. The country’s integrity depends on whether the next stage of this case restores faith or confirms there in one law for the Meades and another for the Persians.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

53 responses to “Leroy Parris matter: when justice blinks”


  1. CLICO under Parris, a man whose behaviour could find resonance within the psychological studies unearthed after WW2, where a personalities submissive to the higher ups in the Third Reich but just as ruthless to their underlings represented a deeper understand about the human behaviour within organizations.

    Long before the collapse Parris was taking many a premium but showed far less alacrity when it came to paying claims. So coward by him, the underlings operated to suit, in ways that would have him consistently deny any such just claims.

    David Thompson seemed to have been able to garner much of the mother’s milk of politics at his hand. That link seemed to have made them inseparable. Of course, he was the fixer who was making it possible for the DLP, should Thompson come to power, be the political actor delivering deals to the then Clico Group, with Parris’s immediate boss Duprey as the then chairman.

    This writer once told Thompson that Parris would lead him to a place of dishonour. Maybe, he didnt live long enough but he was around enough to be sullied by a chimney sweep. Even if Parris does not go to jail, as he should have, the penalty of spending up to 20 years in a high costing litigation is well deserved.


  2. Judge blocks Parris trial

    by SANDRA DOWNES A RULING YESTERDAY has blocked Leroy Parris, the former boss of the collapsed Colonial Life Insurance Company (CLICO), who was at the centre of a multimillion-dollar theft charge, from further prosecution.

    Justice Michelle Weekes handed down that decision in Supreme Court No. 8 after reviewing the evidence and submissions by attorneys for both Parris and the State.

    The judge determined that Magistrate Manila Renee’s decision to submit Parris’ matters to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for him to stand trial would be quashed. She also made an order prohibiting the magistrate from handing over any copies of the documents to the Registrar or DPP, and thirdly, she put in place an injunction preventing the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions from indicting Parris in the future.

    The judge also found that the matter was unconstitutional and a breach of the rules of natural justice.

    King’s Counsel Hal Gollop and attorney Neil Marshall represented Parris, while the State – with the Attorney General, the DPP and Magistrate Manila Renee as the respondents – was represented by attorneys Roger Forde, KC, Rene Forde and Justin Nurse.

    The judge also informed those present that a draft order would be submitted for approval and the parties would subsequently be furnished with her reasons. A date for hearing with

    regard to damages and costs will be on or before December 31, 2026.

    Roger Forde signalled his intention to appeal immediately following the decision.

    After the hearing, Gollop said it had been “a very long and arduous task and we feel vindicated by the decision”.

    He looked forward to further progress so the matter “can be brought to its final conclusion”.

    The court’s “stamp of disapproval”, said the senior lawyer, meant that “they cannot proceed with the criminal matter which was brought against him (Parris)”.

    Marshall added his voice, stating that: “Given their recent history . . . I would expect that whether it has any merit or not, this will not be the last you will hear from the State on this matter.”

    Previously, several charges were brought against Parris, resulting in him being accused of stealing $3.33 million from CLICO between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009. He was also charged with conspiracy to defraud CLICO by inducing the company to pay out the money tolawyers Thompson & Associates.

    Prosecutors alleged that between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, Parris was involved in a conspiracy to cheat the Commissioner of Inland Revenue by failing to submit tax returns or account for income taxes for the 2009 tax year. It also alleged that between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009, Parris engaged in money laundering of $3.33 million.

    Also speaking to the media after the hearing, Forde said that after Magistrate Renee determined there was enough evidence for Parris to go before a jury, his attorneys sought a judicial review. Justice Shona Griffith heard that matter and threw out the application for a review, thereby upholding Magistrate Renee’s decision.

    A judicial review of Justice Griffith’s decision was sought and that came up before Justice Weekes, who determined yesterday that Parris’ matters should not go forward.

    Forde pointed out that “the same facts” which went before Justice Griffith went before Justice Weekes.

    “Here we have found a judge who granted the orders which Madam Justice Griffith refused.

    It is settled law that one cannot restrain the powers of the DPP unless there is mala fides (bad faith). A DPP has powers under the Constitution and there was no allegation that the DPP did anything wrong,” he said.

    However, Marshall explained that there were “two separate and distinct applications”. The decision made by Justice Griffith related to actions taken by Magistrate Kristie Cuffy-Sargeant, while Justice Weekes’ decision was in connection with Magistrate Renee.

    “The only common factor was Mr Parris.”

    Source: Nation


  3. State to appeal High Court ruling on ex-CLICO boss

    written by Jenique Belgrave 23/09/2026

    Hal Gollop KC, Former CLCIO chairman Leroy Parris and Roger Forde KC (File Photo)

    AHigh Court judge has quashed a magistrate’s decision to commit former CLICO Life Insurance Company chairman Leroy Parris to stand trial for alleged theft and conspiracy. The government has indicated its intention to appeal the ruling.

    In 2023, Magistrate Manila Renee sought to have the case, in which Parris was alleged to have stolen $3.3m from the now-defunct insurance company, sent to the High Court. Parris, through his attorneys, Hal Gollop KC and Neil Marshall, filed an application for judicial review and secured an injunction halting the indictment from proceeding.

    Magistrate Renee, the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions were listed as respondents in the suit.

    Delivering her decision in the No. 8 Supreme Court on Wednesday, Justice Michelle Weekes ruled in favour of the application and made an order of certiorari, a writ for a higher court to review a lower court’s decision, quashing the magistrate’s decision to commit Parris to stand trial. 

    She also prohibited the magistrate from sending the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Registrar of the Supreme Court any copy of the documents in the case and granted an injunction restraining the DPP from proceeding with the indictment against Parris.

    Justice Weekes also declared: “The decision of the respondent in making the finding that there was sufficient evidence put before the court upon which the claimant could reasonably stand trial in a High Court is vitiated on the grounds that the first respondent acted in a manner that is unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of natural justice.”

    The judge stated that reasons for her ruling would follow. The court is now to hear submissions on the issue of damages and costs, and the case was adjourned until February 23, 2027.

    Speaking to reporters moments after the ruling, Gollop said: “It has been a long and arduous task and we feel vindicated by the decision and look forward to the further progress of the matter so that we may bring it to a final conclusion. My client is very happy that this act of injustice has been given the stamp of disapproval by the court and we are happy with the outcome.”

    King’s Counsel Roger Forde, who appeared for the State along with attorneys Justin Nurse and Rene Forde, made clear that the matter was not over as he insisted that the former insurance boss should face a jury.

    “The matter is not yet over,” Forde said. “An appeal will be filed and at some point in time, Mr Parris will face a jury. There is no merit at all in the decision. In fact, no reasons have been given for the decision.”

    He noted that the case had previously been placed before another judge who had dismissed it.

    “That itself tells you it is a matter for the appeal court,” he said, adding that he would be filing the application as soon as the reasons were made available.

    Back in 2012, charges were initially laid against the former insurance executive, accusing him of stealing $3.33m from CLICO International Life Insurance Limited between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009, and of conspiracy to defraud CLICO by inducing the company to pay out the money to lawyers Thompson and Associates.

    The State also alleges that, between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, Parris was involved in a conspiracy to cheat the Commissioner of Inland Revenue by failing to submit tax returns or account for income taxes for the 2009 tax year and that between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009, Parris engaged in money laundering of the $3.3m. (JB)

    Source: Barbados Today


  4. @David

    Stop with the faux outrage and surprise. Hope is a road in St. Lucy!

    What nation of laws what? Deep down you know this always was the most likely outcome. Not one single person has beeen held accountable in the CLICO farce.

    White collar crime is not really seen as criminal in Bullbaydos. Never was. Never will be.

    There is an inverse relationship between the amounts stolen and the legal consequences.

    Steal milions – walk free; teef a tin uh cornbeef – 6 months in Dodds.


  5. Well said @ Dullard
    A simple look at a number of KEY appointments made in Brassbados SINCE the CLICO debacle would have told us what the outcome of this case was going to be…
    Don’t mek Bushie call names….

    @ David is well aware of such appointments of KEY CLICO refugees… at all levels.

    Furthermore, one is left to wonder about the quality of the legal ‘support’ for the prosecution – given their history in other public areas.

    What a place!
    The lack of morality and justice challenges even the despicable USA.


  6. @Bush Tea

    Per chance, are you questioning the independence of our judiciary?


  7. @Dullard

    Carlos Belgrave died.


  8. If he had stolen 2 cans of tuna from Massy it would appear he would of had a better chance of being charged.

    So after Clico went into the wallets of many Bajans not a fellow going be held responsible for nothing. As for this $3.3 million dollar issue. Did he receive the payment yes or no? Was any tax paid on it be it dividend tax etc yes or no?

    Now I got a few concerns here, how could a judge say he can not be charged for anything to do with this going forward? So if new information is found that strengthens the states case he immune from that too? So double jeprody applying here then? Also I see the saying “cost will be determined later.” So you mean not only under this ruling is he untouchable, we the state must now pay his legal fees too?

    What de he’ll I hearing!


  9. If he’s so innocent, then why not a trial to satisfy the matter once and for all. Did the judge site any case law that backed up her decision? Who has who in their back pocket one has to wonder. Does the system here give white collar crime a pass?


  10. FROM QC 2 KC – WHAT AN INFERNAL MESS OF THE JURIS CARIBAEUM SCIENTIA – FOR CLEARLY THE LORD CHANCELLOR IS EITHER DIM/DUMB-WITTED, OUT-OF-TOUCH ON ALL LEVELS, BENIGNLY OBSEQUIOUS IN ASSESSING RISK PATENTS & DOWNRIGHT CATHARTIC IN THE REMEDIATION PROCESS OF PROVIDING LOQUACIOUS SUCCOUR FOR THE DEPENDENTS OF NEFARIOUS SLAVE TRADE & ITS VESTIGES

    There’s a lotta’ “BIAS” involved here – but also a lotta’ “BULL-SHYTE”!!!

    Let’s follow the “CHORUS” of the law to its logical conclusion – without fail or fanfare, without “airs & graces”…

    #DownTheRabbitHole

    In the UK, (GOOD ‘OLE BLIGHTEY), the exact same legal framework governs the judicial behavior cited above in this piece…

    The mechanism used by a High Court to invalidate a magistrate’s decision to send a defendant to trial is called “JUDICIAL REVIEW”, (a premise I’ve recently instructed a lawyer to do regarding a serious matter of much import), operating under the principles of UK Administrative Law…

    .Just like in BUBAYDUS*, a UK High Court does not look at whether the “DEFENDENT” is “GUILTY OR INNOCENT” – instead, it acts as a “SUPERVISOR” aka “REFEREE” to ensure the lower court followed the law correctly…

    SO BEFORE FOLKS BEGIN 2 JUMP UP & DOWN – HEAR OUT THE BRASS-BAND

    Under UK LAW PLC, (excuse me taking the PISS*), is established heavily by the landmark [GCHQ CASE (1984)], where a High Court will only quash a magistrate’s committal or referral to the Crown Court on [3] strict grounds…

    (1) The magistrate misunderstood or misapplied the law, or acted outside their statutory powers (ULTRA VIRES)

    #Disclaimer

    I WOULD LOVE TO DO AN FORENSIC AUDIT OF THE JURIS MAGISTERIUM TO SEE HOW MANY COCK-UPs EXIST WITHIN THE LIBRARY OF BUBAYDUS JUDICIAL CASES – REVIEWING AT LEAST A 10-YEAR PATTERN OF RULINGS THAT MAY HAVE GONE TITS-UP

    Forgive me 4 digressing

    (2) The decision was so logically flawed or perverse that no reasonable magistrate could have ever arrived at it (known legally as WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS)

    THERE IS A CURRENT CASE THAT IS ABOUT TO COME TO SOME SUPPOSED LEARNED JUSTICE ON THIS SAID ISSUE OF #WednesburyUnreasonableness AND IT WILL BE KEENLY WATCHED TO SEE HOW THE ASININE POWERS THAT BE HANDLE THIS TOPSY OF MESS

    (3) The magistrate failed to follow statutory procedures, showed bias, or breached the principles of natural justice (e.g., refusing to hear crucial defense arguments)

    AGAIN, THESE NINCOMPOOPS* HOLD THAT THIS FALSE PREMISE CALLED #Bias APPLIES TO OTHERS – EXEMPTING THEMSELVES, BUT WHAT A CLOSSAL CROQ WHEN IT FAIL 2 DELIVER TRUE JUSTICE (again, another such court case)

    In England & Wales, magistrates handle the initial “SENDING” of serious (INDICTABLE) offenses to the Crown Court under the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980…

    If a magistrate makes a “FUNDAMENTAL ERROR”, such as ignoring a complete lack of evidence, or “DENYING” the defense a “STATUTORY RIGHT” to argue that there is “NO CASE 2 ANSWER”, the defendant’s legal team can apply to the “ADMINISTRATIVE COURT” (a division of the High Court) for a *”PREROGATIVE ORDER OF CERTIORARI”* (now commonly called a “QUASHING ORDER”)!!!

    THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PARRIS CASE (basic jurisprudence)

    The case example is [R v Bedwellty Justices (1997)]

    Here is a famous UK example of this kinda’ behavior where the House of Lords ruling in the case of [R v Bedwellty Justices], ex parte Williams found –

    In the case, the court ruled that if a magistrate commits a defendant to stand trial based on evidence that is blatantly inadmissible or legally insufficient, the High Court must step in and quash the committal…

    The higher court ruled that magistrates cannot act arbitrarily; they must have a lawful evidentiary foundation to send someone to trial…

    HOPE THIS IS CLEAR AS MUD 4 those with rose-colored glasses

    Now as to Leroy Parris et al

    HERE WE GO – DOWN THE RABBIT-HOLE AGAIN

    In the UK, just like BUBAYDUS*, a “Quashing Order” is NOT* an acquittal!!!

    It does not mean the person is innocent…

    It simply means the process used to send them to trial was broken!!!

    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) usually has the right to appeal the High Court’s decision to the UK Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court…

    Alternatively, if the High Court allows it, the prosecution can simply fix the legal errors & restart the proceedings correctly from the beginning…

    SIMPLE STUFF, RIGHT?

    LOL

    Here’s where it gets interesting

    Parris is not just facing a single charge of teeffin’…

    The prosecution’s case relies on a complex web of indictable offenses…

    THERE AT LEAST [3] OTHER MAJOR OFFENSES

    (1) Conspiracy to defraud CLICO International Life Insurance Limited…

    (2) Money laundering (concealing the $3.33 million)…

    (3) Conspiracy to cheat the Crown & the Commissioner of Inland Revenue by failing to account for taxes on that income…

    I WOULD DARE ADD –

    #CorporateMalfeasance

    #BadFaithInPublicOffice

    #BreachOfCoporateTrust

    #CorporateEmbezzlement

    LOOK THE SHOPPING LIST IS LONG & EXHAUSTIVE BUT THIS IS AS THE BUSHMAN* TOO OFTEN OPINES – #Brassbados!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Many of the “ISSUES” are tackled in the below piece by #BarbadosToday

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2026/09/23/state-to-appeal-high-court-ruling-on-ex-clico-boss/

    ONE POINT OF CONTENTION THAT MAY BE A SORE THUMB FOR ALL THOSE WHO HAVE LOST ***BIGGGG*** MONEY IS THE FACT THAT ***AUDIT WATCHDAWG*** #DELOITTE MAY BE CULPABLE

    The above piece states: “In a forensic audit Accounting House Deloitte’s stated that the “$3.3 million cheque issued to Leroy Parris was not supported by any legitimate documentation, not authorised under CLICO’s policies, and could not be justified as a lawful payment…“

    COMMONSENSE WOULD THEN DICTATE THE FOLLOWING

    In a standard corporate & regulatory ecosystem under the “RULE” of law, a definitive forensic finding of this magnitude should have automatically triggered a sequential 4-part operational response, however, I will only mention “ONE” or maybe “TWO” or “WHATEVER” – (4 who really cares @ this point)…

    The moment DELOITTE’s auditor identifies that corporate funds were extracted under false pretences, the company’s temporary management or “JUDICIAL MANAGERS” are legally obligated to protect what is left!!!

    What should have occurred is the #JudicialManager should have immediately approached the High Court for a “MAREVA INJUNCTION” (an asset-freezing order) to prevent Parris from moving or dissipating the $3.33 million!!!

    Equally, what should have happened is that the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) & the Royal Barbados Police Force (AKA The Barbados Police Service) should have treated the Deloitte audit as prima facie evidence to launch an “IMMEDIATE” white-collar crime investigation!!!

    BUT AGAIN, THIS IS BRASSBADOS

    “A NATION OF LAWS – #One4TheRichBasterds & #Another4ThePoorBuggers

    Thus, #JusticeDelayed was #JusticeDenied 2 those poor “Policy-Payers” holding a pan fulla’ holes…

    Under modern company law (such as the Barbadian Companies Act), any corporate DIRECTOR” found by an independent audit to have breached their FIDUCIARY DUTIES”, “SELF-DEALT”, or “AUTHORISED FALSE TRANSACTIONS” must be held accountable administratively!!!

    What should have also occurred is the Corporate Affairs & Intellectual Property Office (CAIPO) and/or the Ministry of Finance should have instituted immediate “DIRECTOR DISQUALIFICATION” proceedings!!!

    This would’ve legally “BARRED” Parris from ever serving on the board of any public or private company, insurance firm, or statutory corporation again to protect the public!!!

    SO THE MERRY-GO-ROUND GOES AROUND & AROUND 2 COME AROUND WITH THE SAME ‘OLE DEFUNCT JUDICIAL SYSTEM HOGTIED BY CORRUPTION, CROOKS, FAULTFINDING & FREEMASONS WHO GET AWAY WITH ALL KINDZ OF SHYTE* WILLY-NILLY – WITH ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE END

    #DifferentDay #DifferentMonth #SameOleCRAP*

    #WhatACuntry

    #WhatAPlace

    #HabMerci

    ON THAT PERFIDIOUS NOTE

    #IMDUN – WID THAT


  11. Any update on a deposit that was held at the central bank of Barbados in the name of Leroy Parris?

    https://barbadosunderground.net/2015/02/23/does-leroy-parris-maintain-a-5000000-00-deposit-with-the-central-bank-of-barbados/


  12. ROTFLMBAO @ Gerald Schmelter
    “Does the system here give white collar crime a pass?”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Is water wet?
    Is sugar sweet?
    Is the Mafia undemocratic?

    Boss, the system here IS white collar crime.
    It has been so since the 16th Century, …where ‘crime’ is defined as ‘when poor people do shiite’… or occasionally, when house niggas betray their mafia trust.

    What is TRULY amazing to Bushie, is how all these previously shameful and hidden dealings have now come out so OPENLY into public glare… from Trump’s MAGA racism, to Brassbados’s CLICO highway robbery by elites…
    All this GLOBAL exposure of EVIL is in preparation for Karma’s FINAL judgement.

    Who will be able to stand up and face THE RIGHTEOUS JUDGE???
    …only the fittest of the fittest of the fittest … shall stand.

    Could you be loved? -Bob Marley
    Don’t let them fool yuh
    Or even try to school yuh

    What a time!!!


  13. The only surprising fact is this actually made the news and was not merely a note elsewhere in procedural minutes.
    Clico, like Clearwater Bay, has been interred, exhumation requires very special permission.


  14. STRANGE ODOURS!

    I do not profess to be a lawyer, neither do I profess to be a fool. But I have been around the local court system for the past 45 years and can recognise a strange odour when I smell it. I have intimate knowledge of the sad CLICO situation having investigated and written volumes on aspects of the company’s troubled affairs for two national publications.

    I have listened to some of the attorneys involved in the criminal case brought against former CLICO chairman Leroy Parris, as well as to yesterday’s comments following a decisive ruling by the Supreme Court. And to be totally blunt, the whiff I am picking up from at least one of the lawyers in the matter, Roger Forde, could be less unpleasant.

    Following the ruling by High Court Judge Michelle Weekes to quash Magistrate Manila Renee’s decision to commit Parris to trial on theft and conspiracy charges, Forde said the matter was not over, that they would be an appeal, and that Parris “WILL” face a jury.
    “The matter is not yet over. An appeal will be filed and at some point in time, Mr Parris will face a jury. There is no merit at all in the decision. In fact, no reasons have been given for the decision.”
    Forde also stated that the case had been placed before another judge who had dismissed it.
    “That itself tells you it is a matter for the appeal court,” Forde added.

    But that statement carries a strange odour.
    The truth is that the case to which Forde referred was based on an application against Magistrate Cuffy-Sargeant arising from Parris’ arrest and appearance before that magistrate – two different matters.
    Additionally, Justice Weekes said the decision made at the Lower Court where it was deemed that there was sufficient evidence upon which Parris could “reasonably stand trial in a High Court is vitiated on the grounds that the first respondent acted in a manner that is unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of natural justice.” In layman’s terms, the Magistrate Court erred, it made a boo-boo, it was wrong.
    Weekes also said that the reasons for her ruling would follow. The practice of judges deferring full explanation for rulings is nothing new or plucked from an episode of Star Trek. For Mr. Forde to highlight that no reasons were immediately given smelled awful! And even if he appeals, to state that Parris WILL face a jury carried a most foul scent. That is not Forde’s remit!

    One would generally hope that appeals are not used to frustrate the conclusion of judicial matters and the pecuniary award to aggrieved parties and their counsel. Of course, it is common knowledge that when appeals are lodged on behalf of the government (or private citizen), whether frivolous or otherwise, attorneys lodging the appeals are paid handsomely for each appeal. Some lawyers are seemingly addicted to appeals.
    There are a number of lawyers on government’s payroll, whether in the Solicitor General’s Office or elsewhere, and though I do not detect any strange odour from the fact that Mr. Forde was brought from outside that network, his recruitment is sure to translate into pleasing reward. He has a reputation among his peers of being a very capable lawyer.

    Several years ago, Parris was accused of stealing $3.33m from CLICO International Life Insurance Limited between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009, and of conspiracy to defraud CLICO by inducing the company to pay out the money to lawyers Thompson and Associates. He was also accused that between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, he was involved in a conspiracy to cheat the Commissioner of Inland Revenue by failing to submit tax returns or account for income taxes for the 2009 tax year and that between December 1, 2008, and April 27, 2009, he engaged in money laundering of the $3.33m.
    However, a written statement was given to the police by a member of CLICO’s board of directors indicating that no money had been stolen from CLICO and that none was missing. That is a matter of record.

    But investigations have revealed that the 3.33 million dollars was part of a gratuity payment of a bigger sum and CLICO, through its financial controller, admitted its liability to pay Parris the remainder and requested that the company be allowed to pay the balance of the overall pay-out in installments. That financial controller is the former wife of a current sitting member of the Barbados Parliament. Parris had been compensated for basically transforming CLICO from a matchbox entity into the biggest company of its kind in the Caribbean.

    Again, having followed and written on this matter extensively, the existence of a virtual complainant in the CLICO fraud matter still remains a mystery. Only murder cases, for obvious reasons, carry the Commissioner of Police as the complainant. So, who the hell brought the accusation and charges against Parris?

    I have no relationship with or connection to Mr. Parris but I refuse to join those who seem to dislike him simply because he has been a success in life and because CLICO collapsed. If the current mainstream media take the time to investigate, rather than simply report, they will unearth a few facts. . . as I have. Some years ago, CLICO Trinidad requested 80 million dollars from CLICO Barbados and Parris flatly turned them down. CLICO Barbados’ board of directors overruled him and okayed the disbursement. The rest is history. The downhill slide followed. A check of that company’s board members at that time would have revealed that Barbados’ current Chief Justice Leslie Haynes, Anthony “Beans” Ellis, Terrence Thornhill and former Solicitor General of Barbados Woodbine Davis, were among those on that board. Absolutely no imputation of any sort is meant.
    Just stating a fact!

    Yesterday’s Supreme Court outcome has brought a fresher odour to this unhappy affair.

    Source: Wade Gibbons Facebook


  15. What should be helpful is that former MOF Chris Sinckler is now perched in a BLP cabinet and can assist with finding the skeletons.


  16. It it a bit of a stretch to state that Clico was the largest company of its type in the Caribbean. That err is compounded by suggesting that it was Leroy Parris who was the reason why Clico apparently reached such a level.

    For Parris had a very limited remit beyond Barbados, while the vast amount of Clico’s business was written in T&T, like has been the historical tendency in the Caribbean, the largest countries, some operating wider afield in South and Central América, where the largest population centres are, and as a consequence where the most business comes from.

    Insurance salespeople are generally gregarios types well liked across the board. However, in the case of Leroy Parris, very few liked him. This writer never liked him after he failed to pay the second separate claim for properties damaged, even after independent adjusters so directed. These incidences convinced this writer that Leroy Parris was far less than honest.

    Therefore to reduce Leroy Parris to a simple logic of mass hatred for no reason, in and of itself, by people across the board, represents an over-simplification of who he was and is. It relegates the collective judgements of people who knew him to less than being valuable.


  17. Leroy Parris and Lawrence Duprey enjoyed a unique relationship.


  18. Our Supreme Ruler knows what she is doing. Parris is just as much a national hero as the Most Honourable Senator and Minister Sinckler, and deserves respect and reinstatement to the management of the plantation known as Barbados.

    The saga must continue. Next year marks the big anniversary, when everyone will be forgiven: Lord Drax, Sinckler and Parris. These days, we’re one big family on the plantation, and we all look out for one another.

    Tron


  19. @ David

    Interestingly, during Parris’ first Court appearance in June 2020 to face four (4) charges, he was represented by four lawyers, namely, Hal Gollop, Michael Yearwood, Neil Marshall & Michael Lashley.

    However, I recall posting the following contribution to a BU thread entitled, “Leroy Parris case ‘deliberately’ frozen?”

    Artax

    July 4, 2025, at 6:31 PM

    @ David

    Gollop seems to be suggesting that, based on Terrance Thornhill saying, ‘no money had gone missing from CLICO,’ Magistrate Manila Renee erred in committing Parris to face a judge and jury for his alleged theft of $3.33M from the company.

    Forde and the other lawyers are arguing Thornhill was never cross-examined so as to determine whether or not his statement was true.

    However, according to the forensic report, email data indicated Thompson and Associates’ invoice #: 20067 was emailed to Thornhill, allegedly by Thompson, on December 30, 2008, at 11:42 am.

    Thornhill subsequently forwarded the email to Cheryl Haynes, CIL’s Vice president of Finance, on January 16, 2009.CIL cheque #: 00092 dated January 16, 2009, signed by both Thornhill and Haynes was issued as payment for the invoice.“

    Mr. Thornhill knew the true purpose of the invoice when he received it…… the invoice was made to look as if it was for professional services so that confidentiality over payment to Mr. Parris was maintained.”

    Theoretically, Thornhill is correct that the money was not ‘missing’ from CLICO, since an invoice was issued for ‘services rendered,’ payment approved, and a cheque issued to the payee.

    Parris is approaching 80 years old. I believe this case will be ‘thrown out’ eventually.


  20. @Artax

    How should Deloitte’s finding about the 3.3 million states in their forensic report be considered?


  21. @ David

    Based on what I’ve read, Deloitte prepared two (2) forensic reports, dated December 5, 2011, and June 21, 2013, respectively, and were formally submitted into evidence during the High Court case, Claim No. 99/2015, Neutral Citation BB 2016 HC 7 re “Clico International Life Insurance Ltd. v Parris; Branlee Consulting Services Inc. and Estate of David Thompson.”

    Information was used therefrom to assist the Judge, then C.J Gibson, in his ruling on February 22, 2016.I believe that civil suit was brought by the Judicial Manager.

    However, I’ve so far been unable to ascertain who or what entity made the complaint on CLICO’s behalf that led to the filing of charges against Parris and his subsequent arrest.

    And, I don’t know why the Forensic Audit Report was not mentioned, since it provided a detailed ‘paper trail’ of the processed Parris used to receive the payment of $3.333M.

    If the records indicated CLICO legally owed Parris a gratuity of $3.333M, why would he have sought to receive the sum through an illegitimate process?

    Unless, he feared payment wouldn’t have been forthcoming after the company collapsed and went under Judicial Management, and therefore decided to expedite the process of payment under the guise of an invoice from Thompson & Associates for legal services rendered in the ‘exact same’ $3.333M, which the Deloitte & Touche LLP forensic audit found lacked legitimate documentation and authorisation.

    Mr. Gibbons ‘said’ he, “refuse to join those who seem to dislike him simply because he has been a success in life and because CLICO collapsed.”

    Herein lies the problem.

    Whereas Parris was able to exploit options available to him, whether ‘fair or foul, to receive payments due to him from CLICO, the policy holders were not as fortunate.

    Under those circumstances, why would it be UNREASONABLE for anyone to “DISLIKE” Leroy Parris?


  22. WHY SHOULD LEROY PARRIS GO DOWN WHEN POLITICIANS ON BLP AND DIP CAME INTO GOVERNMENT RELATIVELY POOR HOWEVER LEFT OR CURRENTLY YEARS LATER BECAME MILLIONAIRES AND NO CORRELATION TO THEIR SALARIES AND BENEFITS.

    NOT ONE IN 60 PLUS YEARS HAS BEEN TRIED AND FOUND GUILTY.

    THE 2X3 ISLAND IS A NETWORK ONCE ONE IS ALIGNED WITH THE RIGHT PEOPLE NEVER EVER WILL BE SUCCESSFULLY PROSECUTED NOT EVEN FOR RAPE.


  23. And what about the policyholders, some that have died with their nest eggs down the drain. It is comfortable to have a myopic view.


  24. You still don’t seem to get it Boss….
    The argument at ALL levels in Brassbados is that we are ALL dishonest, crooked and unethical.
    So why should Parris be punished for doing what WE ALL KNOW the politicians , lawyers (and therefore judges), accountants, auditors, managers, clerks, porters, ZR operators, commuters, and now even our school children ALL do – as a matter of routine?

    You ask “What a bout the policyholders”?
    They CHOOSE to put their money with Leroy…

    But what about the TAXPAYERS or the NISSS? – whose money is TAKEN from them.
    Wuh
    If the big boss can tek up $1 BILLION from NISSS, can you imagine the balls it would take to lock up a fellow for ‘just’ $3.3 millions?

    And if a BB would ’tek up’ a little $300 from his workplace, can he HONESTLY condemn Leroy?

    HERE IS WHAT YOU DO NOT GET!!

    We are talking about a nation where wickedness, and the exploitation of the weak and the poor is now ENDEMIC. Where even those of us who ABHOR such a situation are RESIGNED to its normality. These issues merely put us in the position of facing our COLLECTIVE guilt.

    For 20 marks…
    What would YOU do to such a society … if you were its CREATOR, and your STANDARD is one of righteousness, LOVE and Godliness?

    Shiite man!! Bushie would have burned their donkeys from way back with CAHILL… out of Love…
    But the CREATOR is patient and long suffering – not like stinking Bushie…

    Even so, the lotta brass bowls here REALLY pushing our luck with this institutionalization of criminality…

    Remember that when Jah rage, ONE roar from the Lion of the Tribe of Judah… AND THE WHOLE WORLD WILL TURN OVER!!!

    What a place!


  25. @Bush Tea

    Surely you are not advocating a scorched earth policy?


  26. Another story that has never completely faded from the headlines.

    Surely Mr. Parris was not the only person to receive a “bonus.” How many prominent Barbadians used inside information about the sinking ship to secure their investments before the proverbial “feces hit the fan”? After all, as everyone knows, Barbados is like an old fridge: “it don’t keep.”

    Another thought, if any appeal reaches the Supreme Court will the CJ have to recuse himself because of his previous position as a member of the CLICO Board?


  27. THE 2X3 ISLAND IS A NETWORK ONCE ONE IS ALIGNED WITH THE RIGHT PEOPLE NEVER EVER WILL BE SUCCESSFULLY PROSECUTED NOT EVEN FOR RAPE.
    –‐————————————————–

    What is it that you are trying to say?

    That Leroy shouldn’t go down because he is aligned to the right people?

    Make it make sense, nuh?


  28. @ David
    “…a scorched earth policy…?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    This is an inevitable outcome on current trajectory.
    Why prolong the misery?

    From the time that ‘Devil monument’ was built on the Garrison, and then Bushie’s whacker get tek way, – the bushman suspected that the ‘dog was dead’…
    Dat whacker used to wuk SOOO sweet den!!

    @ Sargeant
    If you dig deep enuff, few could escape the recusal route – that is, – if we were an ethical society.
    Furthermore, if you include other SIMILAR crookedness such as HOPE & STEAL housing, Carifesta, Greenland, Carsicot, Radical vaccines, Four Seasons, Clear Waters, … and the MANY yet to be uncovered, it would fall to the dozen or so innocent brass bowls left in Brassbados …to prosecute the lotta cases…
    … Perhaps it is just this ‘dozen or so’ that has delayed the brimstone and fire …so far…!

    What a time!

  29. Maths Ain't Mathing Avatar
    Maths Ain’t Mathing

    CLICO the Maths Ain’t Mathing

    The raggedy unwashed lumpenproletariat that stands outside normal capitalist production relations of the Barbados Underground posse have been rumbling mumbling and grumbling about something called CLICO for 9 years (where 9 in Chinese symbolism stands for the end of the cycle of digits which can be repeated countless number of times in daily spiritual practice such as 18, 36, 72, 108 times etc )

    THE YEARS PASS.. OUR TOMORROWS BECOME OUR YESTERDAYS
    WHEN WILL OUR QUEST END?

    The Barbados Court System is synonymous with Barbados Traffic Woes
    It has blockages, standstills, stagnancy and proceedings are very slow getting to your destination which can lead to immense frustation.

    TOP TIP FOR TODAY 25/9/26
    People should sit down wait and mediate when stuck in traffic or applying to the Court for Justice. Take it EASY listen to some chill out music. When in meditation you can be receptive like Zen (breathing IN), you can hold your breath, or you can be active with visualisation manifestation of your desired outcome (breathing OUT).
    YOU MOVE


  30. @Sargeant

    Wouldn’t it be a simple check for the FSC to review the timing of large deposits withdrawn before due around the time Parris bailed? The same check can be performed when the Mottley government announced the haircut in 2018.


  31. LOL @ David again…
    The FSC?
    Wuh… they are CLICO untainted…?

    You clearly don’t see the plot.


  32. Barbados currently has a law, a policy, that when contraband, drugs or guns, are discovered in containers that everybody in the country connected to those cargoes are to be arrested and charged, we’re told!

    This is a damn serious policy. A few days ago such a series of arrests and charges were made. Included in net was a senior customs broker who on the face of it was unlikely to be so involved in contraband found amongst various items in a forty foot container, items consigned to several people.

    But so is the law, we’re told.

    And if this is the law, we’ll venture to say that Parris is more proximate to the white collar crime at Clico than a possibly innocent customs broker who just tried to clear some food items for a regular customer.


  33. @ Pacha Mummy

    It seems Barbados is getting Federal like Americans where many are arrested and then forced to make plea deals for leniency and witness protection by snitching on others in the syndicate ring.

    Catch a case
    Parris had a case against CLICO his former employers who he was CEO of.
    CLICO had a case against estate of Sinister Prime Minister David Thompson.
    Parris withdrew his money from CLICO as he had inside knowledge of the furcup.
    Courts quashed all cases.

    Your loss is my gain in the funny money game
    following the money is the golden rule in Finance & Accounting 101 classes in Money Management School

    Wife Killers
    Parris is like a magician who knows the tricks of the trade such as making OPP (Other Peoples Property) money disappear like magic while making more money for himself and his company. There are winners and losers in the zero sum game.

    People who expose the trickery behind magic tricks secrets are called wife killers.

    Secrets among secrets magic never revealed to the eyes of the world a trick no other magician can perform should only be taught to one person like an apprentice child of the family who will follow on the trade without exposing secrets.

    Parris was a master magician revered by all destroyed by gambling and alcohol who now exposes the secrets of his own creations to extort drinking money so he can drink to forget all his misdeeds.


  34. Absolutely right about Amerikkka. They always have nuff people in jail and nobody could ever tell which law was broken.

    As the authorities see it, and given the authoritarian system at play, they can indict a ham sándwich.

    Additionally, they also have their mongoose courts, like in Virginia, where if one is held on “national security charges, given inevitable who makes up of every jury, you’re already lost in jail, before trial.

    But the Americans don’t even need a trial. For 90 percent of cases are settled by guilty pleas. Given the cost of a proper defense, the inability of most to pay and the likelihood of long terms in jail, prosecutors have their own way with most people charged with anything.

    And still, this is a place, America, where most people misguidedly assume is anything but the most corrupted place on Earth or Mars. That Barbados is following suit is a pattern not unlike what Donald Drumpf’s opposite local number has been doing all the time.


  35. As it is all over the world, so it is in Barbados. Justice is not handed to the poor. It must be fought for. Who in Barbados is serious about the fight for justice? We continue to get what we are prepared to accept.


  36. The problem is not that ‘justice is NOT handed to the poor’…
    It IS that EQUAL justice is not applied to BOTH the poor and the wealthy / political / influential / connected.

    Justice is for sale!

    If stealing one $50 shirt justifies 9 months (and it may) – along with psychiatric evaluation, and can be adjudicated in three months…
    …What sentence SHOULD apply for a $3.3 million heist?
    …What about the HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR Four Seasons heist?

    …How long should it take? …Until all those involved are dead or promoted beyond justice?
    … What delays our seeking justice with HOPE and STEAL houses?
    – Is it the exclusive addresses of those involved?
    – Or is the level of involvement above the Law?

    When a place descends to such levels of INJUSTICE, the outcome is inevitable – and we have SURELY qualified in this regard.

    What a place!


  37. …and the ACTUAL indicator of NATIONAL COMPLICITY and hopelessness is the CLEAR INDIFFERENCE shown by the citizenship to these WICKED and UNGODLY practices,
    …and indeed our willing ADOPTION of the same shiite at the personal level…
    Planting jobby…

    BUT…
    Harvest time is imminent!
    What a time!


  38. In this real world of variously flawed human beings, selfish people of power and means will exercise their power and employ their means to what they mistakenly believe is their benefit, in ALL arenas. Those lacking in individual power and adequate means must, by necessity, band together, mobilise and collectively fight for justice.

    Your favourite, Brother Bob sang, “Get up, stand up! Stand up for your rights!””

    We note that he did not say to sit down and wait for them to be handed to us on a silver platter. Not in this world!

    There was no difference in our positions. Of course the problem is that rich and poor are not treated equally! Of course in most cases, justice is for sale!

    That’s the way of this world. It is a constant battle that will never end as long as silly humans are in control.

    Battles require dedicated and passionate warriors of the determined kind. We have dedicated and passionate wuker uppers of the escapist kind.

    “You get a government you deserve” was sung by Sugar Aloes. He wasn’t Crazy.


  39. “There was no difference in our positions.”
    ~~~~~~~
    None whatsoever!
    Bushie is just endorsing and expanding on your observation.

    Wait doh!
    You pun de son phone…!?
    …or yuh bite the bullet and got another Nokia?
    Murda!!


  40. The unease of the same son when I leave home in an unreachable state, forced me to cave to Samsung. The mother has become the daughter, having to answer for her whereabouts after dark.

    Last time I beg fuh a piece offa his Apple to check in on you guys, I was warned that I was holding up production. He works “seven days a week, including Sundays” in some form or fashion. PC, laptop, and tablet may shut down on Friday at six, but iphone is always engaged.

    How did you know that I asked if Nokia was still in business?

    Hahahaha!


  41. @Bush Tea and Donna

    We do not live in an egalitarian world. It is one where decisions are based on money, power, greed. There will always be the consequences that come from this situation. The struggle must continue to fight for justice, but it will never be equal!


  42. “It is one where decisions are based on money, power, greed.”
    ~~~~~~
    But boss, THIS is the very root of the problem we have.
    Injustice, bullying, poverty and crime are just some of the CONSEQUENCES of that root.

    So from whence do we have a coordinated call for TRUTH, justice, fairness, and ethics – to replace money / power / greed as our NATIONAL core principles?

    All we are hearing (even from BU) is for the ‘money / powa / greed’ lovers to be more considerate…
    …or for OTHER money /greed / powa groups to challenge the incumbents…
    … or for stronger checks and balances to be put on the Mafia.

    Is the REAL solution not for the WHOLE society to be RE-EDUCATED to appreciate the societal values of truth, justice and fairness… through love …
    or at the very least, by promoting community-centric characteristics?

    What would be so hard about that??? …except that it clashes with the universally accepted albino-centric, greed-driven, philosophy that now dominates our era…


  43. “How did you know that I asked if Nokia was still in business?”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Perhaps because the damn bushman is in the market fuh one too…

    Tired with these fancy shiite phones that need a big manual (…or a 10-year-old,) to operate, and dat feel it smarter dan a bushman…
    Lotta shiite…
    Calling people as it like…
    Turning on face-time at inappropriate times…

    Oh for a good old Nokia …or blackberry…


  44. By the way Boss…
    It sounds like you have been following Chris Hedges ‘goodreads’…
    One of the few public commentators in USA with eyes that seem to work fairly well…
    What a time!!


  45. @Bush Tea

    What will trigger this awakening from the masses?

  46. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Talking bout older phones, I’ve run a Motorola G play for years. Got a newer version last year for Cdn$159 at Costco.


  47. Northern Observer,

    Huh? Clearly, I need to do my own research! My son is forever digging into the history of the universe, humans, animals and all that, but only acknowledges new phone technology.

    I followed his recommendation, but this phone requires me to be extremely careful where I place my finger. This at the very time when the fingers often decide to go their own way and turn on the camera.

    A phone and a finger each refusing to obey orders is a recipe for disaster.

    I could find myself being charged for disseminating indecent images! Come to think of it, I had better stop taking the phone into the bathroom.

    There goes my musical accompaniment in the shower It’s back to acapella.

    Hahahahaha!


  48. Have mercy! The camera is on again!

    Bush Tea,

    Nobody believes the re-education would work. Not enough qualified teachers to teach those classes.


  49. @ David
    “What will trigger this awakening from the masses?”
    ~~~~~~~~~~
    “In the evening you look at the sky. You say, ‘It will be good weather. The sky is red.’
    And in the morning you say, ‘Today it will be stormy. The sky is red and cloudy.’ You know the meaning of what you see in the sky. But you can’t understand the signs of what is happening right now.
    An evil and unfaithful people look for a sign. But none will be given to them except the SIGN OF JONAH.” Matt 16:2

    A Global intervention at the supernatural level that will make ALL of the so-called ‘accomplishments’ of brass bowls look like the jobby that they all REALLY is…
    EVERY brass bowl will experience this awakening…
    Most will run, hide, and weep in shame and despair.

    Don’t you see the storm clouds gathering for this massive land-fall?
    The wars, …the money collapse, …the climate, …the heat, …the unstable earth, …the endemic EVIL, …the hatred – even among little children…

    Yet, only a few will not be caught by surprise.

    What a time!

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading